En mi perfil encontraras posts informativos sobre diversos temas. También puedes encontrar análisis de mercado los cuales se realizan mediante mi bot analítico.
China includes a national blockchain network in its industrial agenda
A joint document by the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, released on October 9, 2026, proposes building a national blockchain network. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has republished the full text.
The proposal appears in section 9, which focuses on integrating the real and digital economies. It is accompanied by a national computing capacity network, as part of an agenda that includes data infrastructure, manufacturing digitalization, and the industrial internet.
The context matters: the document also aims to improve rules governing data ownership, sharing, and rights protection. Blockchain is presented as one component of this industrial modernization.
The goal of building the network is confirmed. The document does not detail its architecture, operator, budget, or launch date; nor does it announce that the network is already operational. It does not mention BTC or ETH or announce authorization to trade cryptocurrencies.
The document itself calls for avoiding bubbles, blind investment, and disproportionate projects. Implementation and technical details will be key to assessing its scope.
Market snapshot: On October 10 at 18:41 UTC, Binance Spot listed BTC at 83,041.58 USDT (+0.72% over 24 hours) and ETH at 2,511.95 USDT (+1.19%). These are market benchmarks, not evidence of an effect from the announcement. An infrastructure policy does not guarantee demand for specific tokens.
Starknet v0.14.4: larger proofs and new compatibility requirements
Starknet’s official register lists the mainnet upgrade to v0.14.4 as completed on October 6, 2026, at 08:13 UTC. The notes published on September 9 had projected October 5, subject to governance approval.
The main improvement expands SNIP-36: an application can bundle computations that exceed the usual transaction limit and submit them as a cryptographic proof, within the protocol’s constraints. This creates room for applications with heavier computational workloads.
The notes estimate that generating large proofs can take up to two minutes, and requires a dedicated proving path. The additional capacity does not automatically make every operation faster.
Gas weights are also changing to bring fees closer to actual costs, and six legacy query interfaces are being removed. Integrators should review their tools: proofs generated with 0.14.3 are rejected by the new verifier, and fee estimates must be calculated using the updated version.
Market snapshot: on Binance Spot, STRK traded at 0.08426 USDT (+13.83% in 24 hours) on October 10 at 14:50 UTC, compared with ETH’s +0.76%. The rise does not prove that the upgrade caused it; volatility persists.
CFTC and prediction markets: what’s proposed and what remains pending
On October 9, 2026, the CFTC announced a proposal to explicitly include certain event contracts in the definition of a “swap.” It cites sports, politics, culture, and weather within its derivatives framework.
These contracts link their payouts to the outcome of an event; many use yes-or-no scenarios. They are used to hedge risks or speculate, and an incorrect prediction can result in losses.
The announced step is a rule proposal. The public comment period lasts 30 days from its publication in the Federal Register; the period does not automatically begin with the announcement.
That same day, the CFTC announced another measure: an interim final rule excluding casino and sportsbook bets from the definition of a swap. The announcement states that it takes effect upon publication in the Federal Register. These are separate proceedings.
The inclusion proposal acknowledges limits: some contracts may be futures or instruments under the SEC’s jurisdiction. It also cautions that regulatory clarity can be mistaken for safety, leading people to underestimate risks.
Market snapshot: on Binance Spot, at 10:45 UTC on October 10, BTC was trading at 82,819.32 USDT (+0.42% in 24 hours) and ETH at 2,495.47 USDT (+0.05%). These are crypto market benchmarks; they do not prove a reaction to the proposal or predict its approval.
XRPL discloses critical bug: patch was already released in September
On October 9, 2026, XRPL published details of a vulnerability that could improperly create XRP. The initial report was submitted on September 22 through its bug bounty program; the report credits Cayden Liao and Veria AI.
The issue affected xrpld 3.4.0 and earlier versions: an error when adding amounts could violate supply rules. RippleX reproduced it in a local environment and raised its severity to critical.
The fix arrived with xrpld 3.4.1 in September and took effect when each server was updated. The October 9 activation mentioned in the same report refers to a different bug, related to Batch. These are two separate fixes.
According to the team, no evidence of exploitation was found on any public network. This describes what was observed; it does not prove that the bug was never exploited. Server operators should use version 3.4.1 or later to stay synchronized with the network.
Market snapshot: on Binance Spot, at 06:47 UTC on October 10, XRP was trading at 1.4090 USDT (+0.47% in 24 hours); BTC was up 0.24%. These moves do not prove a reaction to the patch. A technical fix does not eliminate price risk either.
Aero: dates and terms of the Aerodrome and Velodrome merger
The schedule published on September 25 sets the launch of Aero for October 22 at 00:00 UTC: equivalent to October 21, 20:00 EDT. The current guide details how Aerodrome and Velodrome will be brought together.
The planned swap is 1 old AERO for 1 new AERO. For each VELO, approximately 0.044 AERO: the figure depends on the supply at launch. Velodrome uses VELO in the protocol; Binance identifies it as VELODROME.
For self-custody, conversion requires using the official portal; it does not happen automatically. Exchanges manage their own procedures and schedules. The protocol date alone does not confirm when each platform will act.
veAERO and veVELO positions will become sAERO. Time-locked positions will retain the remaining term, rounded up to whole weeks. The guide requires claiming rewards and clearing active votes before migrating locked positions, and warns that anything unclaimed cannot be recovered afterward.
The conversion is irreversible. Verifying the network, destination, and official channels is part of the process; the swap also does not eliminate liquidity risks.
Binance Spot, 10/10, 02:45 UTC: AERO, 0.8048 USDT (-5.43% in 24h); VELODROME, 0.03502 USDT (-4.40%). Takeaway: the swap ratio describes units; it does not guarantee future economic value. Prices and liquidity may change during the transition.
Securitize brings stocks to Solana: what rights do they include
On October 8, Securitize announced the launch of Securitize Stocks: tokenized U.S. stocks for eligible investors in the U.S., the EU, and other permitted jurisdictions. The announced structure uses Solana and settles trades in USDC.
According to the company, each token is backed 1:1 by a share and conveys the corresponding dividends and voting rights. The structure gives holders a claim on securities held in custody through Securitize Markets. The holder is not listed as a registered shareholder of the issuer unless they convert their position, where such conversion is available.
Access requires identity verification and compliance with local restrictions. The companies whose shares are represented do not sponsor or endorse these tokens.
The announcement includes extended trading hours at launch. 24/7 trading and access through the future NYSE and OKXICE venues remain subject to development and conditions: those venues have not yet launched, according to the announcement.
1:1 backing does not eliminate price losses or liquidity, custody, and transfer restriction risks.
Binance Spot, 9/10, 22:43 UTC: SOL is trading at 109.36 USDT (-1.08% in 24h), with 210.42 million USDT traded in SOL/USDT. Takeaway: expanding a network's use cases does not guarantee proportional demand for its token or a price increase.
CoinDesk’s October 9 coverage highlights a plan by Zakura to incorporate instructions for hash-based signatures into Zcash transparent payments in January. The technical note specifies neither a year nor a network activation date: this is a development target.
With these addresses, spending reveals the public key. Using a new address reduces reuse, but does not replace a cryptographic upgrade.
Zakura also describes PIR: queries that let users check transaction history without telling the server which addresses the wallet is searching for. An experimental option is available in Vizor. It protects the queries; transparent transactions remain public on the blockchain.
Scope matters: this does not prove that all of Zcash is resistant to quantum threats. The fund-recovery design, ZIP 2005, is separate work and acknowledges that it does not, on its own, address overall security or quantum attacks on privacy.
Binance Spot, Oct 9, 18:44 UTC: ZEC at 1,211.69 USDT (+5.50% in 24h), with 203.71 million USDT in ZEC/USDT volume; BTC +1.15%. Takeaway: the price does not demonstrate technical security or that the announcement caused the move.
On October 8, 2026, Richard Blumenthal, the top Democrat on the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sent a letter to Cantor Fitzgerald Chairman Brandon Lutnick concerning the firm’s relationship with Tether, the issuer of USDT.
He asks the firm to preserve records and respond by October 23 at the latest. The questions cover revenue from the business relationship, asset custody, independent audits, anti-money laundering controls, and sanctions compliance. He also requests communications on these matters. With some exceptions, the requested period begins in January 2023.
The investigation is being conducted by the subcommittee’s minority. The letter revisits allegations in its September 28 report about the use of USDT in networks linked to Iran. The request for information is not a ruling and does not, by itself, impose a sanction.
In a statement issued earlier on September 28, Tether defended its cooperation with authorities and described freezes of funds associated with Iranian networks. That statement predates the October 8 letter; it is not a specific response to it.
When evaluating a stablecoin, both its backing assets and their custody and controls matter. A price close to parity is no substitute for that documentation.
Market snapshot: at 14:43 UTC on 9/10, Binance spot showed USDC at 1.0008 USDT and BTC at 82,940.01 USDT. The first figure is an exchange rate between two stablecoins, not proof of either one’s parity with the dollar or of solvency. The investigation’s impact will depend on subsequent documents and actions.
Solana toward 200 ms: more frequent blocks, with limits
On October 9, 2026, Solana’s slot reduction is appearing among Square’s trends. The change stems from SIMD-0525, created on May 1, and is part of a gradual rollout from 400 to 200 milliseconds.
A slot is the interval assigned to a validator to produce a block. According to the official dashboard, the 350, 300, and 250 ms steps are already live on mainnet. The 200 ms target refers to that cadence, not a guarantee that every transaction will be finalized within that time.
Verified status: at 10:42 UTC, a public network query showed epoch 1052, with the 200 ms change activated from its start. SIMD-0525 stipulates that it takes effect one epoch later, in epoch 1053. Technical activation and coming into effect are distinct moments.
The design proportionally reduces the work permitted per block: there will be more frequent opportunities, but smaller blocks. This adjustment alone does not double total capacity per second.
Tracking skipped blocks is key before moving forward. Also, deadlines measured in slots pass more quickly: applications must review their time calculations, and users may have less time to sign before a transaction expires.
Market snapshot: at 10:41 UTC, SOL was trading on Binance spot at 109.82 USDT (-4.05% in 24h); ETH, as a cross-platform reference, was at 2,496.46 USDT (-2.23%). USDT indicates the quoted currency. Technical improvements need stability and real usage; these changes do not prove a reaction to the update or predict returns.
Thailand sets rules for BTC and ETH ETFs starting October 16
On October 8, 2026, Thailand’s SEC announced 11 rules for creating and overseeing crypto ETFs. They will take effect on October 16. That date marks the start of the regulatory framework; the announcement does not signal the launch of any specific fund.
Initially, only Bitcoin and Ethereum will be eligible. Each ETF must follow a passive strategy and maintain an average annual net exposure of at least 80% of its assets to a single crypto asset. This is not authorization for any basket of altcoins.
The funds will be listed exclusively on Thailand’s stock exchange, the SET. Their digital assets must be held by SEC-regulated custodians, and brokers may not offer margin loans to buy these ETFs.
Fund managers will have to demonstrate operational capability and provide information about their structure, providers, and risks. Before investing, investors must confirm that they understand those risks.
During the initial phase, products linked to foreign crypto ETFs will be restricted. Brokers will also be prohibited from facilitating investments in those ETFs for clients who are not institutional or ultra-high-net-worth investors.
Market snapshot: at 06:41 UTC on October 9, Binance spot showed BTC at 82,604.56 USDT (-0.08% over 24h) and ETH at 2,501.32 USDT (-2.33%). USDT is the quote currency here; it is not among the assets initially eligible. Demand will depend on which funds launch and how much money they attract. Regulation does not eliminate volatility or guarantee returns.
IMF: Tokenization alone is not enough to create liquidity
On October 8, 2026, the IMF published an analysis related to the tokenization chapter of its October Global Financial Stability Report. Its diagnosis: these markets are growing, but remain small and fragmented.
The technology makes it possible to represent assets on programmable ledgers and bring together issuance, trading, and settlement. It can reduce costs and processing times; achieving these benefits at scale requires four conditions:
• Legal certainty: tokens must represent enforceable rights. • Regulatory clarity: define how rules apply to new functions. • Interoperability: connect platforms and avoid isolated pools of liquidity. • Safe, widely accepted money for settling transactions.
The IMF sees demand for access outside traditional trading hours, but warns that tokenized markets remain relatively illiquid and more volatile than their conventional counterparts.
Speed also carries risks: automating and connecting markets can accelerate forced selling, liquidity withdrawals, and contagion. Some existing frictions provide time to manage cash needs; removing them requires safeguards.
Market snapshot: at 02:41 UTC on 9/10, Binance spot showed ETH at 2,483.28 USDT (-3.80% in 24h), SOL at 109.90 (-5.72%), and XLM at 0.1930 (-3.79%). These are reference prices for networks used for tokenized assets. These changes do not prove a reaction to the report; greater tokenization activity also does not guarantee demand or returns for their tokens.
Pyth and the 100% rule: what changes in its reserve
On October 8, 2026, Pyth explained the policy approved in OP-PIP-136, submitted on September 24: allocate 100% of the eligible funds received by the DAO from its data-products to accumulate PYTH.
The percentage applies to the DAO’s revenue portion, not to the entire business invoicing. Existing commercial distributions do not change. The authorization replaces the monthly votes of the previous mechanism, based on one-third of the treasury balance separate from PYTH.
Eligible assets are converted into PYTH and returned to the treasury. If the DAO receives PYTH directly, it keeps it; that is not a market purchase. Accumulating tokens in reserve also does not mean burning them or paying dividends.
The September report places the annualized recurring revenue, or ARR, at around $11.5 million. It’s an annualized subscription run-rate: it does not represent cash collected during the quarter or already executed purchase budget.
Execution matters: OP-PIP-140, published on October 7 and still open, proposes recovering USDC and transferring balances to the executing team. Operational risks and revenue drop risks remain.
Market read: at 22:40 UTC on 8/10, Binance spot showed PYTH at 0.08345 USDT (+14.85% in 24h). As context between oracles, LINK was down 3.98% and API3, 5.79%. The divergence does not prove a single cause; the effect of the reserve will depend on actual purchases and available supply, without guaranteeing profitability.
Hashi Prepares to Launch on Mainnet: BTC as Collateral on Sui
On October 8, 2026, the Sui Foundation announced a gradual deployment of Hashi on mainnet by the end of this month. It reported more than $500 million in committed capital: the figure does not correspond to deposits already executed or to liquidity available today.
The proposal allows using BTC as collateral for loans and other DeFi products. Bitcoin remains on its own network; when deposited, hBTC is minted on Sui. When withdrawn, that receipt is burned and the corresponding BTC is released.
Access will be opened progressively as partners complete their integrations. According to the announcement, Anchorage Digital is joining through institutional channels via Atlas and the Porto wallet, along with plans to provide liquidity in stablecoins. Financial products will be offered by third parties.
Risks: using BTC as collateral preserves exposure to its price and may involve liquidation if the collateral value falls. There are also risks related to contracts, validators, and operators. The Guardian layer adds controls over BTC movement, but does not eliminate these risks.
Market take: at 18:41 UTC on 8/10, Binance spot showed BTC at 81,526.01 USDT (-2.14% in 24h), SUI at 1.0264 (-8.46%), and USDC, as a reference for stablecoins, at 1.0006. To assess the announcement, real deposits, loans, and withdrawals after the deployment will need to be observed; committed capital does not guarantee price increases.