gobernanza

💥 MACRO IMPACT: Adam Back and Michael Saylor block the consensus on the BIP 110 proposal

🚀 Industry heavyweights, Adam Back (CEO of Blockstream) and Michael Saylor (founder of MicroStrategy), have publicly expressed their absolute rejection of the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP 110), as reported by Foresight News.

🔥 Back formally argued that BIP 110 seeks to impose regulatory or behavioral restrictions through the consensus layer, directly undermining the core principle of decentralization and the permissionless nature of the Bitcoin network.

⚡ KEY EVENT: Institutional opposition to the technical BIP 110 proposal

🎯 POLITICAL IMPACT: Strict defense of the network’s immune system

👑 MARKET TREND: Rejection of changes that alter the base consensus

💎 Flow Analysis: For macro funds and operators, this resistance from ecosystem leaders eliminates internal regulatory risk, sending a signal of long-term stability that defends Bitcoin’s immutability against centralized governance.

👇 Click the attached chart to analyze the impact on BTC volatility and monitor institutional capital flow. 👇
$BTC
$STRC
$BNB

#BIP110 #AdamBack #MichaelSaylor #CryptoNews #Gobernanza

Starknet opens a consultation on a possible post-quantum L1

On October 15, a proposal was posted on the Starknet forum to explore an independent Layer 1 network with a post-quantum security focus. The consultation is active but non-binding: it gauges support for investigating this possibility.

Voting began on October 15 at 09:32 UTC and is scheduled to close on October 22 at the same time. A favorable result would not, by itself, authorize a transition. Any decision to move from L2 to L1 would require a specific governance process.

The proposal would keep STRK as the token and rule out creating another one. It also states that bridges from Ethereum would remain open. These are conditions of the proposal, not evidence that a new architecture is already operational.

It is important to distinguish three steps: consulting the community, studying a technical solution, and approving its implementation. This vote concerns the first step. The post-quantum goal does not demonstrate comprehensive protection today or set a migration date. Assessing dependencies and security risks would remain part of the work ahead.

Market snapshot: at 17:38 UTC on October 15, Binance spot showed STRK at 0.09316 USDT (+23.07% over 24 hours) and ETH at 2,445.54 USDT (+0.35%). This move does not show that the consultation is its sole cause or predict its outcome. A price increase does not eliminate technical or execution risks.

$STRK $ETH $USDT

Educational Content. Not financial advice.

#Starknet #STRK #Ethereum #Gobernanza #EducacionCripto

Osmosis debate on ending OSMO emissions: what would change

On October 14, a proposal to end inflationary OSMO emissions was posted on the governance forum. It is still under discussion: the Osmosis node’s query on October 15 shows that the proposed parameters have not yet been applied.

The proposal aims to stop the creation of new OSMO and have staking rewards come entirely from protocol revenue, such as trading and transaction fees. The community pool would stop receiving newly issued tokens.

The daily developer unlock would also be paused. According to the author, around 51.9 million OSMO minted since the network’s launch remain: they would stay in the vesting account, and any future unlock would require another governance decision. Pausing that unlock does not mean burning those tokens.

October 20 is the target date for submitting the proposal on-chain, not a confirmed execution date. If approved, the change would take effect from the first subsequent daily period. Fee-based rewards would depend on activity; they are not equivalent to a fixed rate.

Market snapshot: between 09:40 and 09:41 UTC on October 15, Binance spot showed OSMO at 0.0422 USDT (+5.24% in 24 hours), while ATOM, a benchmark for the Cosmos ecosystem, was at 1.668 USDT (-7.08%). This divergence does not prove a single cause. Potentially lower emissions do not guarantee a higher price: demand, liquidity, and the outcome of the governance process also matter.

$OSMO $ATOM $USDT

Educational content. Not financial advice.

#Osmosis #OSMO #Cosmos #Gobernanza #EducacionCripto

Pyth and the 100% rule: what changes in its reserve

On October 8, 2026, Pyth explained the policy approved in OP-PIP-136, submitted on September 24: allocate 100% of the eligible funds received by the DAO from its data-products to accumulate PYTH.

The percentage applies to the DAO’s revenue portion, not to the entire business invoicing. Existing commercial distributions do not change. The authorization replaces the monthly votes of the previous mechanism, based on one-third of the treasury balance separate from PYTH.

Eligible assets are converted into PYTH and returned to the treasury. If the DAO receives PYTH directly, it keeps it; that is not a market purchase. Accumulating tokens in reserve also does not mean burning them or paying dividends.

The September report places the annualized recurring revenue, or ARR, at around $11.5 million. It’s an annualized subscription run-rate: it does not represent cash collected during the quarter or already executed purchase budget.

Execution matters: OP-PIP-140, published on October 7 and still open, proposes recovering USDC and transferring balances to the executing team. Operational risks and revenue drop risks remain.

Market read: at 22:40 UTC on 8/10, Binance spot showed PYTH at 0.08345 USDT (+14.85% in 24h). As context between oracles, LINK was down 3.98% and API3, 5.79%. The divergence does not prove a single cause; the effect of the reserve will depend on actual purchases and available supply, without guaranteeing profitability.

$PYTH $LINK $API3

Educational content. Not financial advice.

#Pyth #Oraculos #Tokenomics #Gobernanza #DeFi

Aptos votes on encrypting transactions: what changes for MEV

Aptos has kept proposal 206 open to activate ChunkyDKG V1 and encrypted transactions. It was created on October 3, 2026, and voting ends on October 6 at 15:43 UTC. When the official governance page was checked on October 5, the proposal was still active: this vote has not confirmed that the feature will be activated.

The idea behind AIP-144 is to protect the contents of a transaction while it waits its turn. Users could submit it encrypted; validators would first agree on the order, then decrypt it before execution.

Why does this matter? Seeing a pending transaction can allow another actor to jump ahead and gain an advantage. The design aims to reduce front-running and sandwich attacks, harmful forms of MEV: value extracted by taking advantage of transaction ordering.

At 10:31 UTC, the proposal had approximately 32.63 million APT in favor, compared with a minimum threshold of 300 million. Near-unanimous support among those who voted does not mean the threshold has been met.

Limitations: encryption would be optional and would require support from user tools. The first version protects transaction contents, but is not intended to hide the sender or all metadata. It also does not replace the security of contracts or wallets. Approval, execution, and actual adoption must still be distinguished.

Market perspective: on Binance Spot, at 10:31 UTC, APT was trading at 0.8139 USDT (+2.79% in 24 hours), compared with ETH (+0.44%) and SOL (-0.54%), other smart contract networks. This difference does not prove that the proposal caused the rise. The relevant test will be its implementation and use; a technical improvement does not guarantee demand for the token or profitability.

Sources: Aptos official governance, AIP-144, and public Binance data.

$APT $ETH $SOL

Educational content. Not financial advice.

#Aptos #MEV #Gobernanza #Blockchain #BinanceSquare

🔥 SOLANA PRESENTS PROPOSALS TO INCREASE TOKEN BURNING AND REDUCE INFLATION 📉

The Solana community and validators are evaluating a key governance package (SIMD-0553 and SIMD-0550 proposals) to reshape the network’s tokenomics.

Key Points:
Daily Burn Increase: The SIMD-0553 proposal introduces resource-based transaction fees, raising the daily burn from 650 SOL to between 7,500 and 9,000 SOL (up to $650,000 per day).

Accelerated De-Inflation: The SIMD-0550 proposal aims to double the annual de-inflation rate to 30%, moving the minimum inflation target (1.5%) from 2032 to 2029.

Financial Impact: It’s estimated to cut issuance by 18.9 million SOL (~$1,360M) over the next six years, reducing supply growth.

#Solana #SOL #Criptomonedas #Gobernanza #Tokenomics
$SOL
$BNB
$BTC

#CardanoFoundation1096BTCUseQuestioned 🕵️ : Transparency or suspicion

June 15 – Thomas Braziel, an expert bankruptcy investor, demands Cardano to reveal the whereabouts of 1.096 $BTC that were part of the ICO from 2015-2017. Back then, they were worth ~$454,000; today, over **$70 million**. The entity that received those funds, a foundation in the Isle of Man, was dissolved in December 2025, leaving no clear institutional trace.

👤 Hoskinson's Explanation

Charles Hoskinson stated in an AMA that the funds were used in 2016-2017 to pay for an audit of the sale of $ADA and to compensate three reviewers. He points out that BTC was trading at ~$414, so the actual expenditure was ~$454,000. The three involved can vouch for the work done.

⚖️ Ongoing Doubts

Braziel doesn't buy the story: he demands invoices, service agreements, and payment records. He criticizes IOHK (Hoskinson's company) for controlling ~95% of the BTC raised, while the Isle of Man foundation received a tiny portion. He threatens to escalate the case to legal or regulatory authorities if there's no transparency.

📉 Delicate Context for Cardano

· ADA is trading near multi-year lows.
· The Foundation's treasury is under scrutiny.
· A proposal for 7.8M ADA for the Singapore Summit was rejected by the community, canceling the event.
· Hoskinson wants to move the community from X to Discord, seen by some as a retreat from scrutiny.

🧠 Conclusion

The FUD isn’t temporary. It’s a litmus test for the transparency of one of the oldest projects. Without documentation, trust in Cardano's governance could continue to deteriorate. The pressure for clear accountability is already a central issue for ADA's credibility.

Do you think Hoskinson will publish the records, or will the case fade away like other controversies? 👇

#Cardano #ADA #Gobernanza #CriptoNoticias

#SolanaProposalToDoubleSOLInflationDecay ⚡️ The change that could make $SOL more scarce

Solana might approve proposal SIMD-0550, aimed at doubling the rate of inflation reduction from 15% to 30% per annum. The goal: to reach a terminal inflation of 1.5% in 2.8 years instead of 5.7.

📊 What would change?

· Emission reduction: 18.9M SOL (~$1.5 billion) would be eliminated over six years.
· More SOL burned: daily transaction fees burned would jump from 650 SOL to 9,000 SOL.
· Staking yield: would drop from 5.84% to 4.34% (year 1).

🏛️ Who's behind it?

The proposal was presented by an engineer from Helius and has the public backing of Anatoly Yakovenko, co-founder of Solana Labs. The CEO of Anza confirmed that proposals SIMD-550 and SIMD-553 are close to being greenlit.

⚖️ Holders vs. Validators

Impact Group
Holders ✅ Less dilution → your tokens are worth more
Stakers ❌ Reduced staking income

⚠️ The Precedent

A similar proposal (SIMD-0228) was rejected in March 2025 with only 37.8% of the votes. This time, Yakovenko's backing could change the outcome.

🧠 What does it mean?

If approved, SOL will become a much scarcer asset in half the time. Fewer emissions = less selling pressure = bullish potential.

Do you think validators will accept lower income to make SOL more valuable? 👇

#solana #SOL #inflación #Gobernanza