bip110

Author of BIP-110, Dathon Ohm, says: If you don’t limit inscription nodes, storage costs are rising
Each Ordinals transaction charges miners a fee, but full nodes must store data permanently
In the long run, junk data will clog the Bitcoin network

But Saylor says, who are you to tell others what they can write on the chain
Bitcoin governance doesn’t have a perfect answer—both sides have reasons

Click the avatar to watch the livestream

Every day, bring you to follow BTC trends—not just what’s happening in the news, but help you understand the underlying logic and opportunities 👀🚀

#BIP110 #Ordinals #Bitcoin governance

Saylor says Bitcoin code is the Constitution. Changing the rules equals抢夺 economic rights.

BIP-110 aims to drive Ordinals out of the BTC network and limit non-financial data for one year.
He gave 110 reasons to oppose it, and also said it’s not just BIP110—every proposal to change the rules is unconstitutional.

Miner approval is only 2.64%, far from the 55% threshold.
This debate will determine whether Bitcoin is a pure payment network or a multifunction platform.

Click the avatar to watch the livestream.

Every day, I’ll bring you the latest BTC trends—more than just news about what happens, I’ll help you understand the underlying logic and opportunities 👀🚀

#BIP110 #Saylor #Bitcoin Constitution

🚨 Saylor delivers a major statement: Bitcoin code is the constitution—changing the rules is an infringement of economic rights!

Click below to follow me 👇🏻 And I’ll help you understand the latest news
点击进入玖玖的粉丝群

Michael Saylor posted a 9-part long tweet, bringing the debate over the Bitcoin protocol up to the level of the constitution
“Bitcoin has already won—now it must survive victory”

🔸 Saylor: Bitcoin’s code is the constitution; any change is a violation of economic rights
🔸 No longer opposing BIP-110—he’s opposing the act of “changing the Bitcoin code” itself
🔸 The backdrop is that the Bitcoin community is currently having heated discussions around BIP-110
🔸 Saylor believes the core rules set in 2009 should be protected, rather than constantly tinkering

His logic is straightforward
Bitcoin’s appeal lies in its certainty; constantly changing the rules will make it more and more like traditional finance

How do you think about Saylor’s shift from opposing BIP-110 → opposing any changes at all?

Do you think Bitcoin’s protocol should be changed or not? Feel free to discuss in the comments 👇

#比特币 #Saylor #BIP110 #CryptoDebate

Michael Saylor is back on the headlines again. This time he’s not buying BTC—he’s defending the BTC constitution
The BIP-110 proposal would restrict non-financial data for a year on the Bitcoin blockchain
In plain terms, they want to drive Ordinals inscriptions out

Saylor says Bitcoin’s consensus rules are the constitution
Any faction changing the rules for its own preferences is seizing everyone’s economic rights
He posted a long article made up of nine posts—fully unleashing his firepower

Click the links below to follow me👇🏻
Supporters of BIP-110 believe BTC should be used purely for peer-to-peer payments
Ordinals and things like images take up block space; miners get paid once, while nodes store it permanently
The two sides are fighting fiercely—right now miners’ support is only 2.64%, nowhere near the 55% threshold
This constitution-level debate will decide the direction of Bitcoin’s future evolution

Every day, I’ll take you to track BTC hotspots—not just what happens in the news, but also help you understand the underlying logic and opportunities 👀🚀

#MichaelSaylor #BIP110 #BitcoinConstitution

Saylor previously posted a long piece of 110 entries opposing BIP-110.
The title is: 110 Reasons BIP 110 Is a Bad Idea.
He goes through the reasons one by one, criticizing the proposal from top to bottom.

Now he’s upgraded his argument again, saying that BIP-110, Segregated Witness, large-block proposals—are all the same problem.
Different tools, the same unconstitutional crime.
Any faction that rewrites Bitcoin’s rules is, in effect, seizing everyone’s economic rights.

Click the link below to follow me 👇🏻
To be honest, I didn’t read all 110 items, but Saylor’s strategy is very smart.
He’s not discussing technical details—he’s taking the issue up to the constitutional level.
Once you accept that constitutional framework, any changes turn into political questions.
This move is brilliant: it pushes the opponents to the side of being unconstitutional.

Every day, I’ll take you to follow BTC hotspots—not just what happens in the news, but also help you understand the logic and opportunities behind it 👀🚀

#Saylor #BIP110 #Bitcoin Governance

What exactly is BIP-110, and why has the Bitcoin community been so heated?
This proposal is to implement a temporary soft fork that limits non-financial data being stored on-chain for one year.
In plain terms, it’s an attempt to push Ordinals NFTs and inscriptions out of the Bitcoin network.

Supporters say Bitcoin is a payment network, not a storage layer.
Opponents say this is censorship, unconstitutional—who are you to control what others write on the blockchain?
Both sides have valid points, but the key issue is: what should Bitcoin really be?

Click the link below to follow me 👇🏻
Saylor elevates it to a constitutional level, saying changing the rules is like抢ing economic rights.
But Dathon Ohm, the author of BIP-110, says: without limits, node storage costs keep rising.
This chain would get clogged with junk data.
Bitcoin governance has always been the hardest problem—there’s no perfect answer.

Every day, I’ll bring you the latest BTC hotspots—not just what’s happening in the news, but also help you understand the underlying logic and opportunities 👀🚀

#BIP110 #比特币 #Ordinals

🚨 $BTC BIP-110 FORK FACES NEAR-ZERO MINER SUPPORT – NETWORK STABILITY INTACT 📊

📌 PlanB publicly opposes the BIP-110 fork, citing fundamental misunderstandings among its supporters. With only ~1% miner backing against the 55% activation threshold, this soft fork is all but dead on arrival. 🛡️ The proposal aimed to restrict non-payment data like runic inscriptions to reduce node burden — but the overwhelming rejection signals that the community prioritizes decentralization over arbitrary censorship.

📊 The signaling window opens around August 7-8, but the odds of adoption are negligible. For now, Bitcoin’s core monetary use case remains unscathed. 💬 Do you think restricting data inscriptions strengthens Bitcoin’s value proposition, or does it risk undermining permissionless innovation? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #BTC #Bitcoin #BIP110 #CryptoNews

🔥 📉

🐕 "Dog Mode" confronts the BIP 110 proposal to fight spam messages on Bitcoin

Amid the debate over how to address the problem of spam messages on the Bitcoin network, a BIP 110 proposal is emerging that seeks to restrict data through a consensus change. In contrast, the "Dog Mode" client offers an alternative solution based on expanding data usability without the need for voting, raising questions about the future of data management on the network.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 Impact: 📈 High
🏷️ BITCOIN

#Bitcoin #BIP110 #DOGMode #Blockchain #Crypto

🔗 Source: https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/07/17/bitcoin-s-anti-spam-fight-gets-a-dog-mode-reply

‌📢 The CEO of Robinhood’s X account was hacked to promote the memecoin VLAD

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev was the victim of an attack that compromised his official account on X (formerly Twitter), which was used to promote a supposed memecoin called Vladhood (VLAD). The post claimed that the token would become Robinhood Chain’s “official mascot” and would be listed inside the app…

‌📢 What is BIP-110? The proposal that could change Bitcoin’s future

Bitcoin is going through one of the most intense technical and philosophical debates since the activation of Taproot in 2021. At the center of the discussion is BIP-110, an improvement proposal aimed at changing how the network handles certain arbitrary data stored within transactions. Although at first glance it may seem…

#BIP110 #BTC #HackerAlert #CEO #ballenas $BTC

Foundry calls on miners to vote in support of the BIP-110 proposal

• Foundry USA is calling on its customers, Bitcoin miners, to participate in voting to support BIP-110.
• BIP-110 is a controversial proposal aimed at reducing the amount of data that can be stored in each Bitcoin transaction.
• Implementing this proposal could affect the data structure and the network’s scalability.

#Bitcoin #BIP110 #CryptoNews #Mining #BinanceSquare

$btc btc

vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinTelegraph

Foundry USA, a mining pool that holds a large share of the hash rate, is also urging miners to vote in support of BIP-110—proposing to lower the transaction data limit from 80 bytes to 20 bytes. This isn’t just a technical update; it’s a signal that the “pure Bitcoin” camp wants to tighten the blockchain to focus on the core function of moving funds, removing applications such as asset tokenization or sidechains.

Direct impact? Projects like Omni Layer and Counterparty would face difficulties if BIP-110 is passed. Supporters argue it reduces spam and fees, but the opposition fears it will stifle innovation. With Foundry’s weight, if most miners follow, the pressure on other pools will be significant.

On the market, the price of BTC is currently not reacting directly, but a potential fork is always a risk. Watch the signals from the mining community and developers in the coming week. Personal view: decentralized governance often leads to conflict—be mentally prepared for volatility. DYOR and keep your assets safe.

#BTC #Mining #BIP110 #Bitcoin

🚫 Michael Saylor strongly opposes the BIP-110 proposal to clean up the blockchain

Michael Saylor, the well-known Bitcoin supporter, published 110 reasons against the BIP-110 proposal, which aims to restrict the inclusion of non-financial data on the Bitcoin blockchain. Saylor believes this proposal threatens network neutrality and could negatively affect its decentralized nature.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 Impact: 🔥 Very high
🏷️ BITCOIN

#Bitcoin #BIP110 #MichaelSaylor #Blockchain #Censorship

🔗 Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/saylor-bip-110-blockchain-cleanup-bad-idea/

₿ Bitcoin BIP-110 Governance Debate: A community divided on base-layer evolution
On July 20, 2026, the debate around Bitcoin's BIP-110 proposal continues to divide the community. Michael Saylor's '110 reasons' against BIP-110 has intensified the conversation about Bitcoin's governance and technical evolution. This debate touches on fundamental questions: should Bitcoin's base layer remain conservative, or should it adapt to remain competitive?
The disagreement reflects a healthy ecosystem where competing visions for Bitcoin's future can be discussed openly. However, prolonged debate without resolution creates uncertainty, which markets typically price as a discount. The community's ability to find consensus will signal governance maturity.

📌 Key Takeaway:
Bitcoin's governance model is being stress-tested — how the community resolves BIP-110 will set precedent for future upgrades.

#Bitcoin #BIP110 #CryptoGovernance #Debate
#BinanceAlphaAlert

📰 Saylor Turns Up Heat With 110 Reasons Why BIP-110 Is Flawed: BIP-110 debate intensifies as key voices weigh in on Bitcoin's future
On July 20, 2026, Michael Saylor has published an extensive critique of BIP-110, outlining 110 reasons why the proposed Bitcoin improvement protocol could be detrimental to the network. The intervention adds significant weight to the ongoing debate.
The BIP-110 discussion has divided the Bitcoin community, with proponents arguing for necessary upgrades and opponents warning of unintended consequences. Saylor's detailed analysis provides a comprehensive counterargument.
The outcome of this debate could shape Bitcoin's technical trajectory for years to come. As one of the largest institutional holders, Saylor's perspective carries substantial weight.

📌 Key Takeaway:
Saylor's 110-point critique of BIP-110 highlights the deep divisions within the Bitcoin community over the protocol's future development path.

#Bitcoin #BIP110
#BinanceAlphaAlert

$BTC BIP-110 COULD REDEFINE BITCOIN'S FUTURE — ARE YOU READY? ⚡

The Bitcoin community is boiling over BIP-110, a proposal to slash miner activation threshold to 55% and limit non-monetary data. Supporters claim it cleans up blockchain bloat, but heavyweights like Michael Saylor warn it risks censorship and L2 disruption.

The early August UASF deadline is weeks away, and miner support remains thin — this isn't just a technical debate, it's a power struggle. The clock is ticking on who decides Bitcoin's direction.

Who are you backing in this governance battle?

Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.

#BIP110 #Bitcoin #Crypto #Governance #BTC

⚡

Bitcoin’s protocol layer has recently been arguing about a very low-level issue: BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork).

In simple terms, this isn’t a market-story—it’s a consensus dispute over what block space can be used for:
- The proposal would use a one-year soft fork to tighten arbitrary data that is put on-chain (e.g., larger OP_RETURN / certain witness usages), locking the chain more firmly to monetary use
- The activation threshold is also controversial: besides the commonly high miner-signal threshold, a lower-threshold design has been discussed, and some worry about forks and precedent risk
- Supporters: reduce spam, and leave the scarce block space for transfers and settlement
- Opponents (including public comments by Saylor, etc.): consensus shouldn’t be used to scrutinize use-cases; spam should be handled by the fee market and node relay policies

A parallel line of thought is DOG Mode—ideas that only change relay policies without touching consensus. It’s still about data payloads, but the path is completely different.

Current reporting still points to miner signaling being relatively low and the community being divided; the proposal’s details and progress should be confirmed with the BIP and developer discussions.

Information source: CoinDesk:
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/07/19/bitcoin-s-biggest-advocate-michael-saylor-says-new-plan-to-clean-up-the-blockchain-is-a-bad-idea
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/07/17/bitcoin-s-anti-spam-fight-gets-a-dog-mode-reply

#Bitcoin #BIP110
Information compilation, not investment advice

【Bitcoin is due for an upgrade, but Michael Saylor publicly opposes it? He says: This could be more dangerous than the problem itself!⚠️₿】

The Bitcoin community has been at it again.
🔥

This time, the focus of the dispute is $BTC

—an upgrade proposal called BIP-110.

Supporters believe that

this upgrade could give Bitcoin more functionality,

and even help the network adapt to future development.

But Strategy founder Michael Saylor has publicly stated:

👉 This upgrade may be more dangerous than the problem it’s trying to solve.

Why?

Saylor believes that

Bitcoin’s greatest value has always been:

✔ Simple
✔ Stable
✔ Secure

If, in order to add more features,

the underlying rules are constantly changed,

it could actually increase system risk,

and even affect the market’s trust in Bitcoin.$ETH

In his view,

Bitcoin’s most important task

is not to pursue ever-increasing complexity,

but to maintain its “digital gold” positioning.

Of course,

another group of developers sees things differently.

They believe that

technology must continue to evolve,

otherwise the future may not be able to meet the growing needs of more users and applications.

In other words,

the core of the debate on both sides isn’t:

👉 Whether or not to upgrade.

But rather:

👉 Should Bitcoin remain absolutely stable, or should it evolve moderately?

In fact, this kind of discussion

has happened many times in Bitcoin’s history.

Each upgrade

has its supporters—and its opponents.$SOL

📌 Michael Saylor once again emphasized that Bitcoin’s biggest advantages are stability and security. He believes that instead of constantly adding new features, it’s better to protect the most core values. As for how Bitcoin should develop in the future, this debate will likely continue for a long time.

Click on the avatar to follow me—every day, I’ll help you understand crypto market hotspots, BTC ecosystem upgrades, institutional viewpoints, and global macro developments first, in the simplest way—so you can catch the next opportunity!🚀
#2026足球风潮 #BIP110 #比特币升级 #WTI原油涨2%至84美元 #里海管道联盟暂停原油装载

​📌 Network architecture: Saylor vs BIP 110 (and common sense?)

📣 Michael Saylor predictably and very loudly criticized the update to BIP 110. In his view, the attempt to limit data storage on the Bitcoin network is not just a technical tweak, but a direct threat to neutrality and a step toward totalitarian censorship.

The topic is definitely important. The principle of freedom of the base layer is sacred: the network must remain impartial, and filtering “spam” should be governed exclusively by the market value of transaction fees—not by artificial bans. 🚫

🚶🏼 You can’t miss Michael’s signature bombast. 🎭 Saylor is true to himself: where developers simply want to clean blocks of junk, he already sees an existential catastrophe and the death of digital gold. We’ll see—when in his next “110” reasons, protection against spam is equated with the fall of the Roman Empire.

🏛️ Jokes aside, the precedent really is dangerous.

​#Bitcoin #BIP110 #CryptoNews #CryptoSmart

​© 2026 YuKhaCryptoDzen. All rights reserved.

MICHAEL SAYLOR WARNS BIP 110 THREATENS $BTC NEUTRALITY 🔥

Michael Saylor has publicly opposed BIP 110, calling its seven consensus restrictions a greater risk to Bitcoin than unwanted data bloat. The proposal uses a 55% miner-signaling threshold, far below the 95% standard, and could close off future upgrade paths like BitVM.

Saylor argues the package trades neutral protocol rules for a symbolic data reduction, while ignoring the cost metrics of valid transactions. The draft reached "Complete" status on June 25, suggesting its author sees it as ready, but community support remains unclear.

Do you believe protocol neutrality should override temporary technical limits?

Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.

#BTC #Bitcoin #BIP110 #CryptoNews

🔥

Michael Saylor Warns BIP 110 Could Threaten Bitcoin’s Neutrality
A new debate has emerged in the Bitcoin community after Michael Saylor strongly criticized Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110. According to Saylor, the proposal could challenge one of Bitcoin’s most important principles—its neutrality.
BIP 110 is designed to temporarily limit large amounts of non-financial data stored on the Bitcoin blockchain. Supporters believe these restrictions would reduce blockchain bloat, lower storage requirements, and make the network more efficient for node operators.
However, Saylor sees the issue differently. He argues that Bitcoin should not decide which valid transactions deserve space on the blockchain. In his view, Bitcoin’s role is to apply the same rules to every transaction without judging its purpose or content.
Saylor believes that once Bitcoin starts restricting certain transaction types through consensus rules, it could set a dangerous precedent for future changes. He emphasizes that Bitcoin’s strength comes from predictable and neutral rules rather than selective restrictions.
Supporters of BIP 110 respond that data-heavy applications such as Ordinals and similar inscriptions increase storage costs and move Bitcoin away from its original purpose as peer-to-peer digital money. They believe reasonable limits would help keep the network efficient.
At the moment, miner support for BIP 110 remains very low, making activation unlikely in the near future. Even so, the discussion has become one of the most important governance debates in the Bitcoin ecosystem this year.
#SICryptoNews #BIP110 $BTC
$XRP
$LINK