#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
Популярные
Новые
·
--
SEC to Clarify On-Chain Fundraising Rules — $5M & $75M Exemptions Coming!
🚨 BREAKING: SEC Chair Paul Atkins just told CNBC on Sept 29: "Even though CLARITY Act failed 49-50 vote, SEC will provide on-chain fundraising clarity itself."
Congress failed, so SEC is stepping in. On Aug 18, SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets (Reg CA) with TWO huge exemptions:
Startup Exemption: $5M over 4 years — for early crypto startups.Fundraising Exemption: $75M per 12 months — modeled on Reg A, for bigger projects.
Hester Peirce leaves Oct 2, leaving only Atkins & Uyeda to write rules. On Sept 17 SEC already cleared tokenized stocks for 24/7 trading.
This is bullish for $ETH $SOL $MATIC — real fundraising is coming on-chain. Are you ready?
{spot}(ETHUSDT)
{spot}(SOLUSDT)
#SEC #OnChain #Fundraising #PaulAtkins #RegCA #CryptoRegulatio#EarningsSeason #sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
SEC to Clarify On-Chain Fundraising Rules — $5M & $75M Exemptions Coming!
🚨 BREAKING: SEC Chair Paul Atkins just told CNBC on Sept 29: "Even though CLARITY Act failed 49-50 vote, SEC will provide on-chain fundraising clarity itself."
Congress failed, so SEC is stepping in. On Aug 18, SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets (Reg CA) with TWO huge exemptions:
Startup Exemption: $5M over 4 years — for early crypto startups.Fundraising Exemption: $75M per 12 months — modeled on Reg A, for bigger projects.
Hester Peirce leaves Oct 2, leaving only Atkins & Uyeda to write rules. On Sept 17 SEC already cleared tokenized stocks for 24/7 trading.
This is bullish for $ETH $SOL $MATIC — real fundraising is coming on-chain. Are you ready?
#SEC #OnChain #Fundraising #PaulAtkins #RegCA #CryptoRegulatio#EarningsSeason #sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
🚨 BREAKING: SEC Chair Paul Atkins just told CNBC on Sept 29: "Even though CLARITY Act failed 49-50 vote, SEC will provide on-chain fundraising clarity itself."
Congress failed, so SEC is stepping in. On Aug 18, SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets (Reg CA) with TWO huge exemptions:
Startup Exemption: $5M over 4 years — for early crypto startups.Fundraising Exemption: $75M per 12 months — modeled on Reg A, for bigger projects.
Hester Peirce leaves Oct 2, leaving only Atkins & Uyeda to write rules. On Sept 17 SEC already cleared tokenized stocks for 24/7 trading.
This is bullish for $ETH $SOL $MATIC — real fundraising is coming on-chain. Are you ready?
#SEC #OnChain #Fundraising #PaulAtkins #RegCA #CryptoRegulatio#EarningsSeason #sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
3
1.8k
·
--
Рост
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
Congress Lost the Vote, So the SEC Chair Said He Would Just Do It Himself 🏛️😂
September 15, the CLARITY Act died in the Senate 49-50, eleven votes short of the sixty needed. Not because of the usual SEC versus CFTC turf fight either, an ethics dispute over crypto holdings by officials and their families is what actually sank it. The next day SEC Chair Paul Atkins posted on X that the agency would act within its own statutory authority regardless. On September 29 he told CNBC the same thing directly, the SEC will clarify onchain fundraising rules with or without Congress. 💎
Here is the honest catch worth sitting with 🧠
Atkins has not said whether this becomes a formal exemption, a registration pathway, or plain staff guidance. No rule text exists yet. What he gave is intent, stated confidently, on television, but intent is not the same thing as a document anyone can actually rely on. 😂
The part that is already real 🎯
Regulation Crypto Assets, proposed back in August, is sitting there right now with actual numbers attached, a startup exemption for raises up to $5 million over four years, and a fundraising exemption up to $75 million a year, plus a path for a token to exit securities status once it is decentralized enough. Comments close October 20. This is likely the vehicle Atkins is pointing at. 💡
The staffing wrinkle 🚀
Commissioner Hester Peirce leaves October 2, leaving just Atkins and Mark Uyeda to actually finish whatever gets built. Prediction markets already price a revived CLARITY Act in the single digits for this year. The SEC is now the only door left open, and it is still mostly closed.
$BTC
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
Congress Lost the Vote, So the SEC Chair Said He Would Just Do It Himself 🏛️😂
September 15, the CLARITY Act died in the Senate 49-50, eleven votes short of the sixty needed. Not because of the usual SEC versus CFTC turf fight either, an ethics dispute over crypto holdings by officials and their families is what actually sank it. The next day SEC Chair Paul Atkins posted on X that the agency would act within its own statutory authority regardless. On September 29 he told CNBC the same thing directly, the SEC will clarify onchain fundraising rules with or without Congress. 💎
Here is the honest catch worth sitting with 🧠
Atkins has not said whether this becomes a formal exemption, a registration pathway, or plain staff guidance. No rule text exists yet. What he gave is intent, stated confidently, on television, but intent is not the same thing as a document anyone can actually rely on. 😂
The part that is already real 🎯
Regulation Crypto Assets, proposed back in August, is sitting there right now with actual numbers attached, a startup exemption for raises up to $5 million over four years, and a fundraising exemption up to $75 million a year, plus a path for a token to exit securities status once it is decentralized enough. Comments close October 20. This is likely the vehicle Atkins is pointing at. 💡
The staffing wrinkle 🚀
Commissioner Hester Peirce leaves October 2, leaving just Atkins and Mark Uyeda to actually finish whatever gets built. Prediction markets already price a revived CLARITY Act in the single digits for this year. The SEC is now the only door left open, and it is still mostly closed.
$BTC
Congress Lost the Vote, So the SEC Chair Said He Would Just Do It Himself 🏛️😂
September 15, the CLARITY Act died in the Senate 49-50, eleven votes short of the sixty needed. Not because of the usual SEC versus CFTC turf fight either, an ethics dispute over crypto holdings by officials and their families is what actually sank it. The next day SEC Chair Paul Atkins posted on X that the agency would act within its own statutory authority regardless. On September 29 he told CNBC the same thing directly, the SEC will clarify onchain fundraising rules with or without Congress. 💎
Here is the honest catch worth sitting with 🧠
Atkins has not said whether this becomes a formal exemption, a registration pathway, or plain staff guidance. No rule text exists yet. What he gave is intent, stated confidently, on television, but intent is not the same thing as a document anyone can actually rely on. 😂
The part that is already real 🎯
Regulation Crypto Assets, proposed back in August, is sitting there right now with actual numbers attached, a startup exemption for raises up to $5 million over four years, and a fundraising exemption up to $75 million a year, plus a path for a token to exit securities status once it is decentralized enough. Comments close October 20. This is likely the vehicle Atkins is pointing at. 💡
The staffing wrinkle 🚀
Commissioner Hester Peirce leaves October 2, leaving just Atkins and Mark Uyeda to actually finish whatever gets built. Prediction markets already price a revived CLARITY Act in the single digits for this year. The SEC is now the only door left open, and it is still mostly closed.
$BTC
136
·
--
🚨 The SEC’s $75M crypto-fundraising headline hides the part that could matter more...
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
On Aug. 18, the SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets — but this is not yet a final rule. Comments are open until Oct. 20.
The headline: projects could potentially raise $5M over four years through a startup exemption, or $20M/$75M over 12 months under Tier 1/2 fundraising exemptions. Non-accredited investors would generally face a 10% of income-or-net-worth purchase limit.
But the deeper mechanism is a regulatory lifecycle:
Raise capital → build the network/application → complete or permanently cease promised “essential managerial efforts” → file Form TR → potentially exit the investment-contract framework.
And the SEC isn't treating crypto like ordinary securities paperwork. Proposed disclosures specifically address source code, network security, token supply/allocation, governance, ecosystem and ways to verify transaction history.
That could turn token launches from a legal gray zone into a defined capital-formation process — while leaving difficult questions around insider resales, retained control and secondary markets. Recent SEC comments are already challenging those gaps.
The real question: does crypto finally get a lawful path to fund a network before it becomes economically independent?
DYOR. This remains a proposal, not law, and any transition out of the investment-contract framework would depend on satisfying the SEC’s proposed conditions
$ETH $SOL $BNB
{future}(SOLUSDT)
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #CryptoRegulation #Stinkmeanerinsights #blockchain
🚨 The SEC’s $75M crypto-fundraising headline hides the part that could matter more...
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
On Aug. 18, the SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets — but this is not yet a final rule. Comments are open until Oct. 20.
The headline: projects could potentially raise $5M over four years through a startup exemption, or $20M/$75M over 12 months under Tier 1/2 fundraising exemptions. Non-accredited investors would generally face a 10% of income-or-net-worth purchase limit.
But the deeper mechanism is a regulatory lifecycle:
Raise capital → build the network/application → complete or permanently cease promised “essential managerial efforts” → file Form TR → potentially exit the investment-contract framework.
And the SEC isn't treating crypto like ordinary securities paperwork. Proposed disclosures specifically address source code, network security, token supply/allocation, governance, ecosystem and ways to verify transaction history.
That could turn token launches from a legal gray zone into a defined capital-formation process — while leaving difficult questions around insider resales, retained control and secondary markets. Recent SEC comments are already challenging those gaps.
The real question: does crypto finally get a lawful path to fund a network before it becomes economically independent?
DYOR. This remains a proposal, not law, and any transition out of the investment-contract framework would depend on satisfying the SEC’s proposed conditions
$ETH $SOL $BNB
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #CryptoRegulation #Stinkmeanerinsights #blockchain
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
On Aug. 18, the SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets — but this is not yet a final rule. Comments are open until Oct. 20.
The headline: projects could potentially raise $5M over four years through a startup exemption, or $20M/$75M over 12 months under Tier 1/2 fundraising exemptions. Non-accredited investors would generally face a 10% of income-or-net-worth purchase limit.
But the deeper mechanism is a regulatory lifecycle:
Raise capital → build the network/application → complete or permanently cease promised “essential managerial efforts” → file Form TR → potentially exit the investment-contract framework.
And the SEC isn't treating crypto like ordinary securities paperwork. Proposed disclosures specifically address source code, network security, token supply/allocation, governance, ecosystem and ways to verify transaction history.
That could turn token launches from a legal gray zone into a defined capital-formation process — while leaving difficult questions around insider resales, retained control and secondary markets. Recent SEC comments are already challenging those gaps.
The real question: does crypto finally get a lawful path to fund a network before it becomes economically independent?
DYOR. This remains a proposal, not law, and any transition out of the investment-contract framework would depend on satisfying the SEC’s proposed conditions
$ETH $SOL $BNB
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #CryptoRegulation #Stinkmeanerinsights #blockchain
2
2.2k
·
--
Статья
**SEC Clarifies On-Chain Fundraising Rules: What Crypto Projects Need to Know**The proposal is more nuanced than “the SEC is making token fundraising legal.” The main implication is that it would create specific federal pathways for certain crypto investment-contract offerings, while preserving securities-law obligations.
What it would actually change
Two proposed fundraising exemptions:Up to $5 million over a four-year period under a one-time exemption.Up to $75 million in any 12-month period under a larger offering exemption. Disclosure still matters. Projects using the exemptions would have to provide specified, principles-based disclosures. The $75M route would additionally involve financial statements and continuing reporting.It doesn't mean “tokens are securities” or “tokens aren't securities.” The proposal distinguishes the underlying crypto asset from an investment contract surrounding its sale. That could allow an asset initially sold through an investment contract to cease being subject to that investment-contract treatment when the issuer's promised/represented essential managerial efforts have been completed or permanently ceased, subject to the proposed conditions.There is a proposed safe harbor. Proposed Rule 400 would establish conditions under which an issuer's investment contract would cease to be treated as such for the relevant federal securities-law definitions.
What this could mean for an on-chain fundraising model
Conceptually, a project could have a clearer path like:
Project → disclosed token offering → qualifying exemption → capital raised → development/managerial commitments → potentially transition away from investment-contract treatment
But the important caveat is that the exemption is not a blanket exemption for any token sale. Eligibility, disclosures, offering limits, reporting, and the precise structure of the transaction still matter.
The proposal also seeks to preempt certain state securities registration/qualification requirements for offerings conducted under the proposed regime, which could reduce one layer of compliance complexity.
One important distinction
This is still a proposal, not a final rule. The SEC lists October 20, 2026 as the public-comment deadline.
And the SEC's September 25 FAQs are staff guidance rather than binding rules; the SEC expressly says they do not create new legal obligations.
So, in practical terms: the proposal could make compliant on-chain capital formation substantially more structured and predictable, but it does not create a free pass for token launches. The biggest questions for a particular project would be whether its offering fits one of the exemptions, what disclosures it must make, and when/if the token can separate from the investment-contract relationship.
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules #Binance
$BNB
{future}(BNBUSDT)
**SEC Clarifies On-Chain Fundraising Rules: What Crypto Projects Need to Know**
The proposal is more nuanced than “the SEC is making token fundraising legal.” The main implication is that it would create specific federal pathways for certain crypto investment-contract offerings, while preserving securities-law obligations.
What it would actually change
Two proposed fundraising exemptions:Up to $5 million over a four-year period under a one-time exemption.Up to $75 million in any 12-month period under a larger offering exemption. Disclosure still matters. Projects using the exemptions would have to provide specified, principles-based disclosures. The $75M route would additionally involve financial statements and continuing reporting.It doesn't mean “tokens are securities” or “tokens aren't securities.” The proposal distinguishes the underlying crypto asset from an investment contract surrounding its sale. That could allow an asset initially sold through an investment contract to cease being subject to that investment-contract treatment when the issuer's promised/represented essential managerial efforts have been completed or permanently ceased, subject to the proposed conditions.There is a proposed safe harbor. Proposed Rule 400 would establish conditions under which an issuer's investment contract would cease to be treated as such for the relevant federal securities-law definitions.
What this could mean for an on-chain fundraising model
Conceptually, a project could have a clearer path like:
Project → disclosed token offering → qualifying exemption → capital raised → development/managerial commitments → potentially transition away from investment-contract treatment
But the important caveat is that the exemption is not a blanket exemption for any token sale. Eligibility, disclosures, offering limits, reporting, and the precise structure of the transaction still matter.
The proposal also seeks to preempt certain state securities registration/qualification requirements for offerings conducted under the proposed regime, which could reduce one layer of compliance complexity.
One important distinction
This is still a proposal, not a final rule. The SEC lists October 20, 2026 as the public-comment deadline.
And the SEC's September 25 FAQs are staff guidance rather than binding rules; the SEC expressly says they do not create new legal obligations.
So, in practical terms: the proposal could make compliant on-chain capital formation substantially more structured and predictable, but it does not create a free pass for token launches. The biggest questions for a particular project would be whether its offering fits one of the exemptions, what disclosures it must make, and when/if the token can separate from the investment-contract relationship.
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules #Binance
$BNB
What it would actually change
Two proposed fundraising exemptions:Up to $5 million over a four-year period under a one-time exemption.Up to $75 million in any 12-month period under a larger offering exemption. Disclosure still matters. Projects using the exemptions would have to provide specified, principles-based disclosures. The $75M route would additionally involve financial statements and continuing reporting.It doesn't mean “tokens are securities” or “tokens aren't securities.” The proposal distinguishes the underlying crypto asset from an investment contract surrounding its sale. That could allow an asset initially sold through an investment contract to cease being subject to that investment-contract treatment when the issuer's promised/represented essential managerial efforts have been completed or permanently ceased, subject to the proposed conditions.There is a proposed safe harbor. Proposed Rule 400 would establish conditions under which an issuer's investment contract would cease to be treated as such for the relevant federal securities-law definitions.
What this could mean for an on-chain fundraising model
Conceptually, a project could have a clearer path like:
Project → disclosed token offering → qualifying exemption → capital raised → development/managerial commitments → potentially transition away from investment-contract treatment
But the important caveat is that the exemption is not a blanket exemption for any token sale. Eligibility, disclosures, offering limits, reporting, and the precise structure of the transaction still matter.
The proposal also seeks to preempt certain state securities registration/qualification requirements for offerings conducted under the proposed regime, which could reduce one layer of compliance complexity.
One important distinction
This is still a proposal, not a final rule. The SEC lists October 20, 2026 as the public-comment deadline.
And the SEC's September 25 FAQs are staff guidance rather than binding rules; the SEC expressly says they do not create new legal obligations.
So, in practical terms: the proposal could make compliant on-chain capital formation substantially more structured and predictable, but it does not create a free pass for token launches. The biggest questions for a particular project would be whether its offering fits one of the exemptions, what disclosures it must make, and when/if the token can separate from the investment-contract relationship.
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules #Binance
$BNB
130
·
--
Рост
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
🇺🇸🚨 SEC TO CLARIFY THE RULES FOR ON-CHAIN FUNDRAISING!
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to provide more clarity around how securities can be raised and issued on blockchain networks.
🔗 On-chain fundraising
🏦 Tokenized securities
📋 Regulatory clarity
⚡ More institutions exploring blockchain
Clearer rules could help traditional finance better understand how capital raising and securities issuance can move on-chain. 👀
Could this accelerate the tokenization trend? 🚀
#SEC #RWA #crypto
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
🇺🇸🚨 SEC TO CLARIFY THE RULES FOR ON-CHAIN FUNDRAISING!
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to provide more clarity around how securities can be raised and issued on blockchain networks.
🔗 On-chain fundraising
🏦 Tokenized securities
📋 Regulatory clarity
⚡ More institutions exploring blockchain
Clearer rules could help traditional finance better understand how capital raising and securities issuance can move on-chain. 👀
Could this accelerate the tokenization trend? 🚀
#SEC #RWA #crypto
🇺🇸🚨 SEC TO CLARIFY THE RULES FOR ON-CHAIN FUNDRAISING!
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to provide more clarity around how securities can be raised and issued on blockchain networks.
🔗 On-chain fundraising
🏦 Tokenized securities
📋 Regulatory clarity
⚡ More institutions exploring blockchain
Clearer rules could help traditional finance better understand how capital raising and securities issuance can move on-chain. 👀
Could this accelerate the tokenization trend? 🚀
#SEC #RWA #crypto
165
·
--
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules BREAKING:
SEC
Chair Paul Atkins said it again, days after the CLARITY Act's failure.
"Even though the CLARITY Act failed in Congress, we are proceeding
to provide clarity to the marketplace as far as how to
raise money on-chain."
"We're trying
to
move things on-chain, which I think is an exciting prospect."
Here's what's actually behind that statement.
Regulation Crypto Assets. Would let token founders raise up to $5,000,000 over four years, or $75,000,000 annually, without full registration requirements.
Atkins calls it one of the most significant SEC steps in roughly 40 years of unchanged securities rules.
Also updating transfer agent rules to allow blockchain-based recordkeeping. Proposing a path for investment advisers to self-custody crypto directly.
Three concrete rulemaking tracks. Not just rhetoric.
Here's the honest caveat Atkins himself gave weeks earlier.
"What we really do need is statutory grounding of this to make sure that it is sustainable."
Rules built purely on agency authority can be reversed by a future commission.
A law passed by Congress can't be undone as easily.
The Senate vote failed 49-50. Eleven votes short.
Atkins isn't pretending the SEC's path replaces legislation.
He's building the fastest available substitute while Congress figures out if it can finish the job it already spent 11 months on.$DKNG $JASMY $CRV
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules BREAKING:
SEC
Chair Paul Atkins said it again, days after the CLARITY Act's failure.
"Even though the CLARITY Act failed in Congress, we are proceeding
to provide clarity to the marketplace as far as how to
raise money on-chain."
"We're trying
to
move things on-chain, which I think is an exciting prospect."
Here's what's actually behind that statement.
Regulation Crypto Assets. Would let token founders raise up to $5,000,000 over four years, or $75,000,000 annually, without full registration requirements.
Atkins calls it one of the most significant SEC steps in roughly 40 years of unchanged securities rules.
Also updating transfer agent rules to allow blockchain-based recordkeeping. Proposing a path for investment advisers to self-custody crypto directly.
Three concrete rulemaking tracks. Not just rhetoric.
Here's the honest caveat Atkins himself gave weeks earlier.
"What we really do need is statutory grounding of this to make sure that it is sustainable."
Rules built purely on agency authority can be reversed by a future commission.
A law passed by Congress can't be undone as easily.
The Senate vote failed 49-50. Eleven votes short.
Atkins isn't pretending the SEC's path replaces legislation.
He's building the fastest available substitute while Congress figures out if it can finish the job it already spent 11 months on.$DKNG $JASMY $CRV
SEC
Chair Paul Atkins said it again, days after the CLARITY Act's failure.
"Even though the CLARITY Act failed in Congress, we are proceeding
to provide clarity to the marketplace as far as how to
raise money on-chain."
"We're trying
to
move things on-chain, which I think is an exciting prospect."
Here's what's actually behind that statement.
Regulation Crypto Assets. Would let token founders raise up to $5,000,000 over four years, or $75,000,000 annually, without full registration requirements.
Atkins calls it one of the most significant SEC steps in roughly 40 years of unchanged securities rules.
Also updating transfer agent rules to allow blockchain-based recordkeeping. Proposing a path for investment advisers to self-custody crypto directly.
Three concrete rulemaking tracks. Not just rhetoric.
Here's the honest caveat Atkins himself gave weeks earlier.
"What we really do need is statutory grounding of this to make sure that it is sustainable."
Rules built purely on agency authority can be reversed by a future commission.
A law passed by Congress can't be undone as easily.
The Senate vote failed 49-50. Eleven votes short.
Atkins isn't pretending the SEC's path replaces legislation.
He's building the fastest available substitute while Congress figures out if it can finish the job it already spent 11 months on.$DKNG $JASMY $CRV
22
·
--
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
⚡ SEC Reportedly Prepares Clearer Rules for On-Chain Fundraising
🇺🇸 The SEC is reportedly working toward clearer guidance on how securities laws apply to blockchain-based fundraising.
🔗 The focus could include:
• Token offerings and tokenized shares
• Registration and disclosure requirements
• Investor-protection rules
• Custody and intermediary requirements
• Secondary trading of tokenized securities
🏦 Why it matters: Greater clarity could give companies and financial institutions a clearer framework for exploring tokenized capital markets.
⚠️ Clearer rules would not mean every token sale is automatically approved. Regulatory treatment could still depend on the structure, investors, marketing, custody, and trading arrangements.
👀 Could clearer SEC rules accelerate institutional adoption of tokenized assets?
#SEC #Tokenization #RWA #CryptoRegulation
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
⚡ SEC Reportedly Prepares Clearer Rules for On-Chain Fundraising
🇺🇸 The SEC is reportedly working toward clearer guidance on how securities laws apply to blockchain-based fundraising.
🔗 The focus could include:
• Token offerings and tokenized shares
• Registration and disclosure requirements
• Investor-protection rules
• Custody and intermediary requirements
• Secondary trading of tokenized securities
🏦 Why it matters: Greater clarity could give companies and financial institutions a clearer framework for exploring tokenized capital markets.
⚠️ Clearer rules would not mean every token sale is automatically approved. Regulatory treatment could still depend on the structure, investors, marketing, custody, and trading arrangements.
👀 Could clearer SEC rules accelerate institutional adoption of tokenized assets?
#SEC #Tokenization #RWA #CryptoRegulation
⚡ SEC Reportedly Prepares Clearer Rules for On-Chain Fundraising
🇺🇸 The SEC is reportedly working toward clearer guidance on how securities laws apply to blockchain-based fundraising.
🔗 The focus could include:
• Token offerings and tokenized shares
• Registration and disclosure requirements
• Investor-protection rules
• Custody and intermediary requirements
• Secondary trading of tokenized securities
🏦 Why it matters: Greater clarity could give companies and financial institutions a clearer framework for exploring tokenized capital markets.
⚠️ Clearer rules would not mean every token sale is automatically approved. Regulatory treatment could still depend on the structure, investors, marketing, custody, and trading arrangements.
👀 Could clearer SEC rules accelerate institutional adoption of tokenized assets?
#SEC #Tokenization #RWA #CryptoRegulation
·
--
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules The SEC just said "we got this" 😎
Congress blocked the CLARITY Act (49–50), so the SEC is doing its own thing. Chair Paul Atkins says on chain fundraising rules are coming anyway.
Good news: less guessing for crypto builders.
Catch: rules made by agencies can be undone way easier than laws.
Stay tuned, and maybe chat with a lawyer before you raise or invest.
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules The SEC just said "we got this" 😎
Congress blocked the CLARITY Act (49–50), so the SEC is doing its own thing. Chair Paul Atkins says on chain fundraising rules are coming anyway.
Good news: less guessing for crypto builders.
Catch: rules made by agencies can be undone way easier than laws.
Stay tuned, and maybe chat with a lawyer before you raise or invest.
Congress blocked the CLARITY Act (49–50), so the SEC is doing its own thing. Chair Paul Atkins says on chain fundraising rules are coming anyway.
Good news: less guessing for crypto builders.
Catch: rules made by agencies can be undone way easier than laws.
Stay tuned, and maybe chat with a lawyer before you raise or invest.
246
·
--
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
😎 The SEC says it’s moving ahead on crypto fundraising rules.
According to the source, Congress blocked the CLARITY Act in a 49–50 vote, while SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the agency is still working on rules for on-chain fundraising.
For crypto builders, clearer rules could mean less uncertainty around how fundraising activities are treated.
But there’s an important trade-off: rules created by an agency can generally be changed or reversed more easily than legislation passed by Congress.
For anyone building or investing in this space, the regulatory details will matter.
#CryptoRegulation #SEC #crypto #blockchain #Web3
#sectoclarifyonchainfundraisingrules
😎 The SEC says it’s moving ahead on crypto fundraising rules.
According to the source, Congress blocked the CLARITY Act in a 49–50 vote, while SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the agency is still working on rules for on-chain fundraising.
For crypto builders, clearer rules could mean less uncertainty around how fundraising activities are treated.
But there’s an important trade-off: rules created by an agency can generally be changed or reversed more easily than legislation passed by Congress.
For anyone building or investing in this space, the regulatory details will matter.
#CryptoRegulation #SEC #crypto #blockchain #Web3
😎 The SEC says it’s moving ahead on crypto fundraising rules.
According to the source, Congress blocked the CLARITY Act in a 49–50 vote, while SEC Chair Paul Atkins said the agency is still working on rules for on-chain fundraising.
For crypto builders, clearer rules could mean less uncertainty around how fundraising activities are treated.
But there’s an important trade-off: rules created by an agency can generally be changed or reversed more easily than legislation passed by Congress.
For anyone building or investing in this space, the regulatory details will matter.
#CryptoRegulation #SEC #crypto #blockchain #Web3
33
·
--
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
El presidente de la SEC aclarará las normas de financiación en cadena dentro de los límites de la autoridad legal.
Paul Atkins, afirmó que la agencia aclarará las normas sobre financiación en cadena dentro de su ámbito de competencia, a pesar del fracaso de la Ley CLARITY.
El Senado rechazó el proyecto de ley por 49 votos contra 50 el 15 de septiembre, sin alcanzar el umbral de 60 votos. Atkins no especificó si la guía incluirá exenciones, registro o notas del personal.
Las preocupaciones sobre la financiación del terrorismo y los activos de riesgo están bajo escrutinio regulatorio mientras la SEC avanza con la normativa. La SEC ya había respaldado las acciones tokenizadas el 17 de septiembre y publicó nueve preguntas frecuentes el 25 de septiembre.
$BTC
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
$NVDA.US
{stock_us}(NVDA.US)
$BNB
{spot}(BNBUSDT)
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
El presidente de la SEC aclarará las normas de financiación en cadena dentro de los límites de la autoridad legal.
Paul Atkins, afirmó que la agencia aclarará las normas sobre financiación en cadena dentro de su ámbito de competencia, a pesar del fracaso de la Ley CLARITY.
El Senado rechazó el proyecto de ley por 49 votos contra 50 el 15 de septiembre, sin alcanzar el umbral de 60 votos. Atkins no especificó si la guía incluirá exenciones, registro o notas del personal.
Las preocupaciones sobre la financiación del terrorismo y los activos de riesgo están bajo escrutinio regulatorio mientras la SEC avanza con la normativa. La SEC ya había respaldado las acciones tokenizadas el 17 de septiembre y publicó nueve preguntas frecuentes el 25 de septiembre.
$BTC
$NVDA.US
$BNB
El presidente de la SEC aclarará las normas de financiación en cadena dentro de los límites de la autoridad legal.
Paul Atkins, afirmó que la agencia aclarará las normas sobre financiación en cadena dentro de su ámbito de competencia, a pesar del fracaso de la Ley CLARITY.
El Senado rechazó el proyecto de ley por 49 votos contra 50 el 15 de septiembre, sin alcanzar el umbral de 60 votos. Atkins no especificó si la guía incluirá exenciones, registro o notas del personal.
Las preocupaciones sobre la financiación del terrorismo y los activos de riesgo están bajo escrutinio regulatorio mientras la SEC avanza con la normativa. La SEC ya había respaldado las acciones tokenizadas el 17 de septiembre y publicó nueve preguntas frecuentes el 25 de septiembre.
$BTC
$NVDA.US
$BNB
1
1
78
·
--
近期，美国证券交易委员会（SEC）加强了对链上募资活动的监管，引发市场广泛关注。SEC主席Gary Gensler多次强调，任何在区块链上进行的证券发行都必须遵守现行证券法。这意味着去中心化金融（DeFi）项目若涉及证券发行，可能面临合规挑战。我认为，监管加强虽短期内可能增加项目成本，但长期有利于市场健康发展，保护投资者利益。企业需重视合规，确保链上募资活动合法透明。#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
近期，美国证券交易委员会（SEC）加强了对链上募资活动的监管，引发市场广泛关注。SEC主席Gary Gensler多次强调，任何在区块链上进行的证券发行都必须遵守现行证券法。这意味着去中心化金融（DeFi）项目若涉及证券发行，可能面临合规挑战。我认为，监管加强虽短期内可能增加项目成本，但长期有利于市场健康发展，保护投资者利益。企业需重视合规，确保链上募资活动合法透明。#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
3
·
--
链上融资规则登广场热榜｜SEC仍处征求意见阶段｜BTC在83760附近我不追
我的态度偏谨慎：监管路径逐渐清晰值得跟踪，但不能把提案当成已经落地的利好。币安广场当前热门话题#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules排在前列。对应的一手材料是美国SEC官网“Regulation Crypto Assets”拟议规则，文件号S7-2026-27。官网明写仍是Proposed Rule，公众评论截止日为10月20日。SEC主席的说明则给出两档拟议豁免：初创豁免拟允许四年内最多融资500万美元，另一档拟允许每12个月最多7500万美元；发行人仍需作原则性披露，并受反欺诈和反操纵要求约束。这不是今天新增的最终批准，更不是所有代币从此可以无条件融资。
为什么这与BTC有关？我的理解是间接而非直接。若最终规则降低合规融资摩擦，交易平台、做市与托管基础设施可能受益，资金对整个加密板块的风险偏好可能改善；但比特币本身不是靠项目方发行融资的资产，不能把“某类项目融资豁免”算成BTC链上需求，更不能据此推算Strategy或ETF今天增持。反方向也成立：若披露门槛、适用资产边界或最终文本收紧，市场先前的乐观预期可能回吐。读提案要盯适用范围、审计条件、评论后的修订和最终生效日期，而不是只记住7500万美元的上限。
市场已如何反应？截至写稿，币安BTC/USDT约83764美元，24小时约跌0.52%，高低约84564至82900美元。价格仍在区间内，不能把这段波动归因于热榜或SEC旧提案。广场Most Searched里资金注意力更多落在QNT、AAVE等币，说明话题热度与BTC即时买盘并非同一个指标。上方先看84564，只有放量站稳且回踩不破，才能讨论向85000延伸；下方82900若有效跌破，区间防守逻辑就被推翻。今晚美国BEA还将公布GDP第三次估计与八月个人收入和支出，宏观数据可能比规则讨论更快影响利率预期与BTC波动，公布前不把预期当结果。
如果是我自己交易，此刻不参与，方向是条件式现货小仓位多头。只有数据落地后价格重新站上84564美元、回踩确认且波动收敛，才动用总资金最多2%试单；先在85000美元附近减半，余仓看85800美元，价格失守84200美元止损，若突破后迅速跌回区间也直接平仓。若先跌破82900美元，就取消多头计划，不逆势摊平，暂不做高杠杆空单。监管事实、宏观数据和价格验证三件事都到位之前，少交易比抢第一根K线更有纪律。
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #BTC
以上仅为个人市场观察，不构成投资建议。
链上融资规则登广场热榜｜SEC仍处征求意见阶段｜BTC在83760附近我不追
我的态度偏谨慎：监管路径逐渐清晰值得跟踪，但不能把提案当成已经落地的利好。币安广场当前热门话题#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules排在前列。对应的一手材料是美国SEC官网“Regulation Crypto Assets”拟议规则，文件号S7-2026-27。官网明写仍是Proposed Rule，公众评论截止日为10月20日。SEC主席的说明则给出两档拟议豁免：初创豁免拟允许四年内最多融资500万美元，另一档拟允许每12个月最多7500万美元；发行人仍需作原则性披露，并受反欺诈和反操纵要求约束。这不是今天新增的最终批准，更不是所有代币从此可以无条件融资。
为什么这与BTC有关？我的理解是间接而非直接。若最终规则降低合规融资摩擦，交易平台、做市与托管基础设施可能受益，资金对整个加密板块的风险偏好可能改善；但比特币本身不是靠项目方发行融资的资产，不能把“某类项目融资豁免”算成BTC链上需求，更不能据此推算Strategy或ETF今天增持。反方向也成立：若披露门槛、适用资产边界或最终文本收紧，市场先前的乐观预期可能回吐。读提案要盯适用范围、审计条件、评论后的修订和最终生效日期，而不是只记住7500万美元的上限。
市场已如何反应？截至写稿，币安BTC/USDT约83764美元，24小时约跌0.52%，高低约84564至82900美元。价格仍在区间内，不能把这段波动归因于热榜或SEC旧提案。广场Most Searched里资金注意力更多落在QNT、AAVE等币，说明话题热度与BTC即时买盘并非同一个指标。上方先看84564，只有放量站稳且回踩不破，才能讨论向85000延伸；下方82900若有效跌破，区间防守逻辑就被推翻。今晚美国BEA还将公布GDP第三次估计与八月个人收入和支出，宏观数据可能比规则讨论更快影响利率预期与BTC波动，公布前不把预期当结果。
如果是我自己交易，此刻不参与，方向是条件式现货小仓位多头。只有数据落地后价格重新站上84564美元、回踩确认且波动收敛，才动用总资金最多2%试单；先在85000美元附近减半，余仓看85800美元，价格失守84200美元止损，若突破后迅速跌回区间也直接平仓。若先跌破82900美元，就取消多头计划，不逆势摊平，暂不做高杠杆空单。监管事实、宏观数据和价格验证三件事都到位之前，少交易比抢第一根K线更有纪律。
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #BTC
以上仅为个人市场观察，不构成投资建议。
我的态度偏谨慎：监管路径逐渐清晰值得跟踪，但不能把提案当成已经落地的利好。币安广场当前热门话题#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules排在前列。对应的一手材料是美国SEC官网“Regulation Crypto Assets”拟议规则，文件号S7-2026-27。官网明写仍是Proposed Rule，公众评论截止日为10月20日。SEC主席的说明则给出两档拟议豁免：初创豁免拟允许四年内最多融资500万美元，另一档拟允许每12个月最多7500万美元；发行人仍需作原则性披露，并受反欺诈和反操纵要求约束。这不是今天新增的最终批准，更不是所有代币从此可以无条件融资。
为什么这与BTC有关？我的理解是间接而非直接。若最终规则降低合规融资摩擦，交易平台、做市与托管基础设施可能受益，资金对整个加密板块的风险偏好可能改善；但比特币本身不是靠项目方发行融资的资产，不能把“某类项目融资豁免”算成BTC链上需求，更不能据此推算Strategy或ETF今天增持。反方向也成立：若披露门槛、适用资产边界或最终文本收紧，市场先前的乐观预期可能回吐。读提案要盯适用范围、审计条件、评论后的修订和最终生效日期，而不是只记住7500万美元的上限。
市场已如何反应？截至写稿，币安BTC/USDT约83764美元，24小时约跌0.52%，高低约84564至82900美元。价格仍在区间内，不能把这段波动归因于热榜或SEC旧提案。广场Most Searched里资金注意力更多落在QNT、AAVE等币，说明话题热度与BTC即时买盘并非同一个指标。上方先看84564，只有放量站稳且回踩不破，才能讨论向85000延伸；下方82900若有效跌破，区间防守逻辑就被推翻。今晚美国BEA还将公布GDP第三次估计与八月个人收入和支出，宏观数据可能比规则讨论更快影响利率预期与BTC波动，公布前不把预期当结果。
如果是我自己交易，此刻不参与，方向是条件式现货小仓位多头。只有数据落地后价格重新站上84564美元、回踩确认且波动收敛，才动用总资金最多2%试单；先在85000美元附近减半，余仓看85800美元，价格失守84200美元止损，若突破后迅速跌回区间也直接平仓。若先跌破82900美元，就取消多头计划，不逆势摊平，暂不做高杠杆空单。监管事实、宏观数据和价格验证三件事都到位之前，少交易比抢第一根K线更有纪律。
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #BTC
以上仅为个人市场观察，不构成投资建议。
32
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
The SEC is finally drawing the lines for on-chain fundraising. 🇺🇸
The days of guessing what the SEC thinks about your token launch might be coming to an end. Between the recently proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets" and the new SEC Division of Corporation Finance FAQs published on September 25, we are seeing the first comprehensive offering frameworks tailored specifically for crypto.
Here is the insider breakdown of what this actually means for builders and investors:
Clearer Capital Raising: The SEC's proposed framework seeks to provide clear pathways for crypto entrepreneurs to raise capital on-chain while complying with federal securities laws. This provides a structured alternative to the legal gray areas that have historically plagued initial token offerings.
The Buyback Nuance: The recent guidance clarifies that token buybacks do not automatically classify a token as a security. However, the SEC warns that if a project explicitly promotes a buyback as a mechanism to generate yield or returns, it can trigger an investment-contract analysis under the Howey test.
DeFi & Network Upgrades: The FAQs also address staking receipt tokens, secondary market trading, and network upgrades. By clarifying the types of promises that constitute an investment contract, decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and DeFi protocols now have a clearer roadmap for planning fundraising and protocol updates while managing regulatory risk.
The Analyst Takeaway: While this is still strictly staff guidance and not a change to existing law, it signals a massive shift from pure "regulation by enforcement" to actionable compliance rubrics. For the first time, projects have a tangible picture of what the SEC will look at when scrutinizing token economics and decentralized networks.
Do you think these clearer guidelines will spark a new wave of compliant on-chain capital raising, or will the rules still feel too restrictive for decentralized builders? Let us know your thoughts below!!!
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
The SEC is finally drawing the lines for on-chain fundraising. 🇺🇸
The days of guessing what the SEC thinks about your token launch might be coming to an end. Between the recently proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets" and the new SEC Division of Corporation Finance FAQs published on September 25, we are seeing the first comprehensive offering frameworks tailored specifically for crypto.
Here is the insider breakdown of what this actually means for builders and investors:
Clearer Capital Raising: The SEC's proposed framework seeks to provide clear pathways for crypto entrepreneurs to raise capital on-chain while complying with federal securities laws. This provides a structured alternative to the legal gray areas that have historically plagued initial token offerings.
The Buyback Nuance: The recent guidance clarifies that token buybacks do not automatically classify a token as a security. However, the SEC warns that if a project explicitly promotes a buyback as a mechanism to generate yield or returns, it can trigger an investment-contract analysis under the Howey test.
DeFi & Network Upgrades: The FAQs also address staking receipt tokens, secondary market trading, and network upgrades. By clarifying the types of promises that constitute an investment contract, decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and DeFi protocols now have a clearer roadmap for planning fundraising and protocol updates while managing regulatory risk.
The Analyst Takeaway: While this is still strictly staff guidance and not a change to existing law, it signals a massive shift from pure "regulation by enforcement" to actionable compliance rubrics. For the first time, projects have a tangible picture of what the SEC will look at when scrutinizing token economics and decentralized networks.
Do you think these clearer guidelines will spark a new wave of compliant on-chain capital raising, or will the rules still feel too restrictive for decentralized builders? Let us know your thoughts below!!!
The SEC is finally drawing the lines for on-chain fundraising. 🇺🇸
The days of guessing what the SEC thinks about your token launch might be coming to an end. Between the recently proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets" and the new SEC Division of Corporation Finance FAQs published on September 25, we are seeing the first comprehensive offering frameworks tailored specifically for crypto.
Here is the insider breakdown of what this actually means for builders and investors:
Clearer Capital Raising: The SEC's proposed framework seeks to provide clear pathways for crypto entrepreneurs to raise capital on-chain while complying with federal securities laws. This provides a structured alternative to the legal gray areas that have historically plagued initial token offerings.
The Buyback Nuance: The recent guidance clarifies that token buybacks do not automatically classify a token as a security. However, the SEC warns that if a project explicitly promotes a buyback as a mechanism to generate yield or returns, it can trigger an investment-contract analysis under the Howey test.
DeFi & Network Upgrades: The FAQs also address staking receipt tokens, secondary market trading, and network upgrades. By clarifying the types of promises that constitute an investment contract, decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and DeFi protocols now have a clearer roadmap for planning fundraising and protocol updates while managing regulatory risk.
The Analyst Takeaway: While this is still strictly staff guidance and not a change to existing law, it signals a massive shift from pure "regulation by enforcement" to actionable compliance rubrics. For the first time, projects have a tangible picture of what the SEC will look at when scrutinizing token economics and decentralized networks.
Do you think these clearer guidelines will spark a new wave of compliant on-chain capital raising, or will the rules still feel too restrictive for decentralized builders? Let us know your thoughts below!!!
61
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
The SEC is expected to provide clearer guidance on on-chain fundraising rules, which could help bring more regulatory clarity to blockchain projects and digital asset markets.
#SEC #crypto #blockchain #Regulation #DigitalAssets
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
The SEC is expected to provide clearer guidance on on-chain fundraising rules, which could help bring more regulatory clarity to blockchain projects and digital asset markets.
#SEC #crypto #blockchain #Regulation #DigitalAssets
The SEC is expected to provide clearer guidance on on-chain fundraising rules, which could help bring more regulatory clarity to blockchain projects and digital asset markets.
#SEC #crypto #blockchain #Regulation #DigitalAssets
52
·
--
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
🚨 SEC CLARIFIES ON-CHAIN FUNDRAISING RULES
SEC proposes Reg CA - $5M Startup Exemption + $75M Fundraising Exemption + Safe Harbor to become commodity!
Bullish for Binance listings and $BTC $ETH ?
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #SEC #Binance #BTC #bullish
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
🚨 SEC CLARIFIES ON-CHAIN FUNDRAISING RULES
SEC proposes Reg CA - $5M Startup Exemption + $75M Fundraising Exemption + Safe Harbor to become commodity!
Bullish for Binance listings and $BTC $ETH ?
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #SEC #Binance #BTC #bullish
🚨 SEC CLARIFIES ON-CHAIN FUNDRAISING RULES
SEC proposes Reg CA - $5M Startup Exemption + $75M Fundraising Exemption + Safe Harbor to become commodity!
Bullish for Binance listings and $BTC $ETH ?
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules #SEC #Binance #BTC #bullish
79
🚨 #SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
The SEC is moving toward a clearer framework for crypto fundraising — and this could be an important step for the on-chain economy.
In August, the SEC proposed “Regulation Crypto Assets,” creating tailored exemptions for certain crypto investment-contract offerings:
🔹 Startup exemption: up to $5M over 4 years
🔹 Fundraising exemption: up to $75M in a 12-month period
🔹 Principles-based disclosure requirements
🔹 Continued antifraud and antimanipulation protections
The SEC also recently issued FAQs clarifying how its March 2026 crypto interpretation applies to areas such as functionality, decentralization and issuer activities.
The bigger question is what clearer rules could mean for builders:
Will compliant on-chain fundraising become easier?
Could more capital formation move onto blockchain rails?
And where will regulators draw the line between a crypto asset and an investment contract?
The proposal is still subject to public comment, with comments due October 20, 2026 — so the final framework could still change.
The next phase of crypto adoption may not just be about trading.
It could be about how companies and protocols raise capital on-chain. 🌐
What do you think this means for the future of crypto fundraising?
#Crypto #Regulation #OnChain #DeFi! #blockchains #web3_binance #BinanceSquare $SOL
{future}(SOLUSDT)
$ACT
{future}(ACTUSDT)
$XRP
{future}(XRPUSDT)
🚨 #SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
The SEC is moving toward a clearer framework for crypto fundraising — and this could be an important step for the on-chain economy.
In August, the SEC proposed “Regulation Crypto Assets,” creating tailored exemptions for certain crypto investment-contract offerings:
🔹 Startup exemption: up to $5M over 4 years
🔹 Fundraising exemption: up to $75M in a 12-month period
🔹 Principles-based disclosure requirements
🔹 Continued antifraud and antimanipulation protections
The SEC also recently issued FAQs clarifying how its March 2026 crypto interpretation applies to areas such as functionality, decentralization and issuer activities.
The bigger question is what clearer rules could mean for builders:
Will compliant on-chain fundraising become easier?
Could more capital formation move onto blockchain rails?
And where will regulators draw the line between a crypto asset and an investment contract?
The proposal is still subject to public comment, with comments due October 20, 2026 — so the final framework could still change.
The next phase of crypto adoption may not just be about trading.
It could be about how companies and protocols raise capital on-chain. 🌐
What do you think this means for the future of crypto fundraising?
#Crypto #Regulation #OnChain #DeFi! #blockchains #web3_binance #BinanceSquare $SOL
$ACT
$XRP
The SEC is moving toward a clearer framework for crypto fundraising — and this could be an important step for the on-chain economy.
In August, the SEC proposed “Regulation Crypto Assets,” creating tailored exemptions for certain crypto investment-contract offerings:
🔹 Startup exemption: up to $5M over 4 years
🔹 Fundraising exemption: up to $75M in a 12-month period
🔹 Principles-based disclosure requirements
🔹 Continued antifraud and antimanipulation protections
The SEC also recently issued FAQs clarifying how its March 2026 crypto interpretation applies to areas such as functionality, decentralization and issuer activities.
The bigger question is what clearer rules could mean for builders:
Will compliant on-chain fundraising become easier?
Could more capital formation move onto blockchain rails?
And where will regulators draw the line between a crypto asset and an investment contract?
The proposal is still subject to public comment, with comments due October 20, 2026 — so the final framework could still change.
The next phase of crypto adoption may not just be about trading.
It could be about how companies and protocols raise capital on-chain. 🌐
What do you think this means for the future of crypto fundraising?
#Crypto #Regulation #OnChain #DeFi! #blockchains #web3_binance #BinanceSquare $SOL
$ACT
$XRP
1
62
·
--
Рост
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
💡 Discussion
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules highlights the SEC’s proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, which aims to create a tailored framework for certain crypto-asset investment contracts. The proposal includes exemptions for offerings up to $5 million over four years and $75 million per 12-month period, subject to disclosure and other conditions.
The key issue is how these rules could make compliant on-chain fundraising more clearly defined while keeping issuers subject to securities-law protections against fraud and market manipulation. The proposal is not yet final; public comments are due October 20, 2026.
Unique thought:
⛓️ The bigger story isn't simply “more fundraising”—it's whether clearer rules can connect on-chain capital formation with traditional investor protections without slowing blockchain innovation.
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
💡 Discussion
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules highlights the SEC’s proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, which aims to create a tailored framework for certain crypto-asset investment contracts. The proposal includes exemptions for offerings up to $5 million over four years and $75 million per 12-month period, subject to disclosure and other conditions.
The key issue is how these rules could make compliant on-chain fundraising more clearly defined while keeping issuers subject to securities-law protections against fraud and market manipulation. The proposal is not yet final; public comments are due October 20, 2026.
Unique thought:
⛓️ The bigger story isn't simply “more fundraising”—it's whether clearer rules can connect on-chain capital formation with traditional investor protections without slowing blockchain innovation.
💡 Discussion
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules highlights the SEC’s proposed Regulation Crypto Assets, which aims to create a tailored framework for certain crypto-asset investment contracts. The proposal includes exemptions for offerings up to $5 million over four years and $75 million per 12-month period, subject to disclosure and other conditions.
The key issue is how these rules could make compliant on-chain fundraising more clearly defined while keeping issuers subject to securities-law protections against fraud and market manipulation. The proposal is not yet final; public comments are due October 20, 2026.
Unique thought:
⛓️ The bigger story isn't simply “more fundraising”—it's whether clearer rules can connect on-chain capital formation with traditional investor protections without slowing blockchain innovation.
40
·
--
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
The clarity we’ve been waiting for: the SEC is moving toward providing clear, updated regulatory guidelines for on-chain fundraising.
For years, Web3 builders and investors have navigated a maze of regulatory ambiguity. While security token frameworks and compliance tools have evolved, traditional securities laws haven't kept pace with transparent, smart-contract-driven capital formation.
Clear guidelines will protect retail participants while giving legitimate protocols a reliable playbook to raise capital without legal risk. This is a crucial milestone for bridging traditional finance (TradFi) with decentralized capital markets.
Transparency, compliance, and real innovation—that is how Web3 scales long term.
What’s your take on this move?
$AGPU
$S
$SOL
#MarketImpact
#Write2Earn
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
The clarity we’ve been waiting for: the SEC is moving toward providing clear, updated regulatory guidelines for on-chain fundraising.
For years, Web3 builders and investors have navigated a maze of regulatory ambiguity. While security token frameworks and compliance tools have evolved, traditional securities laws haven't kept pace with transparent, smart-contract-driven capital formation.
Clear guidelines will protect retail participants while giving legitimate protocols a reliable playbook to raise capital without legal risk. This is a crucial milestone for bridging traditional finance (TradFi) with decentralized capital markets.
Transparency, compliance, and real innovation—that is how Web3 scales long term.
What’s your take on this move?
$AGPU
$S
$SOL
#MarketImpact
#Write2Earn
The clarity we’ve been waiting for: the SEC is moving toward providing clear, updated regulatory guidelines for on-chain fundraising.
For years, Web3 builders and investors have navigated a maze of regulatory ambiguity. While security token frameworks and compliance tools have evolved, traditional securities laws haven't kept pace with transparent, smart-contract-driven capital formation.
Clear guidelines will protect retail participants while giving legitimate protocols a reliable playbook to raise capital without legal risk. This is a crucial milestone for bridging traditional finance (TradFi) with decentralized capital markets.
Transparency, compliance, and real innovation—that is how Web3 scales long term.
What’s your take on this move?
$AGPU
$S
$SOL
#MarketImpact
#Write2Earn
1
321
·
--
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
SEC is finally clarifying on-chain fundraising rules with the proposed Regulation Crypto Assets.
New startup exemption lets projects raise up to $5M over 4 years with lighter rules. Fundraising exemption offers tiers up to $20M or $75M yearly for US-based issuers, plus a safe harbor once essential managerial efforts end — so tokens can exit “security” status.
Big step for real clarity after years of enforcement-first approach.
This is the clarity crypto needed. Legitimate builders can finally raise capital on-chain without constant fear of lawsuits, while the safe harbor path to decentralization is huge. Still early and US-focused, but it signals regulators are adapting instead of just cracking down. Progress over pure restriction.
#SEC #CryptoRegulation #OnChain #Web3 #Fundraising
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
SEC is finally clarifying on-chain fundraising rules with the proposed Regulation Crypto Assets.
New startup exemption lets projects raise up to $5M over 4 years with lighter rules. Fundraising exemption offers tiers up to $20M or $75M yearly for US-based issuers, plus a safe harbor once essential managerial efforts end — so tokens can exit “security” status.
Big step for real clarity after years of enforcement-first approach.
This is the clarity crypto needed. Legitimate builders can finally raise capital on-chain without constant fear of lawsuits, while the safe harbor path to decentralization is huge. Still early and US-focused, but it signals regulators are adapting instead of just cracking down. Progress over pure restriction.
#SEC #CryptoRegulation #OnChain #Web3 #Fundraising
SEC is finally clarifying on-chain fundraising rules with the proposed Regulation Crypto Assets.
New startup exemption lets projects raise up to $5M over 4 years with lighter rules. Fundraising exemption offers tiers up to $20M or $75M yearly for US-based issuers, plus a safe harbor once essential managerial efforts end — so tokens can exit “security” status.
Big step for real clarity after years of enforcement-first approach.
This is the clarity crypto needed. Legitimate builders can finally raise capital on-chain without constant fear of lawsuits, while the safe harbor path to decentralization is huge. Still early and US-focused, but it signals regulators are adapting instead of just cracking down. Progress over pure restriction.
#SEC #CryptoRegulation #OnChain #Web3 #Fundraising
17
🚨 BREAKING: SEC CLARIFIES TOKEN BUYBACK RULES FOR FUNCTIONAL CRYPTO NETWORKS! 🇺🇸⚖️
🏛️ SEC staff says buyback announcements for functional crypto systems do not, by themselves, constitute promises of essential managerial efforts.
⚠️ For non-functional networks, buybacks tied to token-holder yield or returns can still be relevant under the Howey analysis.
🔗 This could provide more clarity for protocol treasury and cash-flow models.
📌 The guidance is SEC staff guidance, not a new rule or law, and has no legal force or effect.
🔥 Could this give crypto protocols more flexibility around token buybacks?
Follow for daily crypto updates 🚨
$MOVR $ARK $SOON
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
#UKFCAOpensCryptoFirmAuthorization
🚨 BREAKING: SEC CLARIFIES TOKEN BUYBACK RULES FOR FUNCTIONAL CRYPTO NETWORKS! 🇺🇸⚖️
🏛️ SEC staff says buyback announcements for functional crypto systems do not, by themselves, constitute promises of essential managerial efforts.
⚠️ For non-functional networks, buybacks tied to token-holder yield or returns can still be relevant under the Howey analysis.
🔗 This could provide more clarity for protocol treasury and cash-flow models.
📌 The guidance is SEC staff guidance, not a new rule or law, and has no legal force or effect.
🔥 Could this give crypto protocols more flexibility around token buybacks?
Follow for daily crypto updates 🚨
$MOVR $ARK $SOON
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
#UKFCAOpensCryptoFirmAuthorization
🏛️ SEC staff says buyback announcements for functional crypto systems do not, by themselves, constitute promises of essential managerial efforts.
⚠️ For non-functional networks, buybacks tied to token-holder yield or returns can still be relevant under the Howey analysis.
🔗 This could provide more clarity for protocol treasury and cash-flow models.
📌 The guidance is SEC staff guidance, not a new rule or law, and has no legal force or effect.
🔥 Could this give crypto protocols more flexibility around token buybacks?
Follow for daily crypto updates 🚨
$MOVR $ARK $SOON
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
#UKFCAOpensCryptoFirmAuthorization
270
Войдите, чтобы посмотреть больше материала
Присоединяйтесь к пользователям криптовалют по всему миру на Binance Square
⚡️ Получайте новейшую и полезную информацию о криптоактивах.
💬 Нам доверяет крупнейшая в мире криптобиржа.
👍 Получите достоверные аналитические данные от верифицированных создателей контента.
Эл. почта/номер телефона
В тренде
1
#BinanceKZ
Просмотров: 17,314
69 обсуждают
2
#BitcoinClears$85200
Просмотров: 1,450
83 обсуждают
3
#AltcoinSeasonIndexHoldsAbove60For5Days
Просмотров: 10,699
521 обсуждают
4
#USADPAdds90000JobsInSeptember
Просмотров: 3,093
247 обсуждают
5
#USCorePCEEasesTo3%InAugust
Просмотров: 3,280
217 обсуждают
6
#KospiPostsWorstQuarterSince2020
Просмотров: 3,550
260 обсуждают
7
#SECToClarifyOnChainFundraisingRules
Просмотров: 10,347
420 обсуждают
8
#UKFCAOpensCryptoFirmAuthorization
Просмотров: 13,869
413 обсуждают
9
#JapanMOFStudyGroupOnTokenizedGovtBonds
Просмотров: 12,022
332 обсуждают
10
#QNTRises287%
Просмотров: 56,391
736 обсуждают