Ansari116
53 投稿
Ansari116
I am Ansari116, a Bitcoin lover and NFT creator and holder. I enjoy exploring the world of cryptocurrencies and creating digital collectibles.
取引を発注
BTCホルダー
超高頻度トレーダー
5.4年
10 フォロー
93 フォロワー
53 いいね
投稿
ポートフォリオ
すべて
引用
翻訳参照
TermMax by the Numbers: Looking Beyond the Fixed-Rate Narrative
A protocol's headline idea can sound compelling, but adoption becomes more interesting when you look at what is actually happening on-chain.
As of August 19, DefiLlama tracks @TermMax at roughly $31.2M TVL and $27.3M in active loans, with 11 yield pools tracked. Ethereum currently represents about 98% of that TVL.
Those numbers tell me three things.
First, TermMax has moved beyond being only a fixed-rate concept. There is meaningful capital actively borrowing through the system.
Second, the protocol is still small compared with established lending giants. That means liquidity depth, especially for individual maturities, matters more than headline TVL.
Third, multi-chain deployment should not be confused with evenly distributed adoption. Most independently tracked capital is still concentrated on Ethereum.
The more useful way to evaluate TermMax is therefore not simply:
“How much TVL does it have?”
I would also watch:
• active loans
• liquidity for each maturity
• organic lending demand
• protocol fees
• how activity behaves after incentives change
Fixed-rate infrastructure ultimately needs repeat borrowers and lenders, not just deposits.
For me, that is the real metric to watch as the TermMax ecosystem develops around $TMX.
#termmax @TermMax
A protocol's headline idea can sound compelling, but adoption becomes more interesting when you look at what is actually happening on-chain.
As of August 19, DefiLlama tracks @TermMax at roughly $31.2M TVL and $27.3M in active loans, with 11 yield pools tracked. Ethereum currently represents about 98% of that TVL.
Those numbers tell me three things.
First, TermMax has moved beyond being only a fixed-rate concept. There is meaningful capital actively borrowing through the system.
Second, the protocol is still small compared with established lending giants. That means liquidity depth, especially for individual maturities, matters more than headline TVL.
Third, multi-chain deployment should not be confused with evenly distributed adoption. Most independently tracked capital is still concentrated on Ethereum.
The more useful way to evaluate TermMax is therefore not simply:
“How much TVL does it have?”
I would also watch:
• active loans
• liquidity for each maturity
• organic lending demand
• protocol fees
• how activity behaves after incentives change
Fixed-rate infrastructure ultimately needs repeat borrowers and lenders, not just deposits.
For me, that is the real metric to watch as the TermMax ecosystem develops around $TMX.
#termmax @TermMax
翻訳参照
Idle Capital Is a Hidden Cost in DeFi...... Here’s How TermMax Approaches It
A lending strategy can advertise an attractive rate and still waste capital if too much money sits unused while waiting for borrowers.
That problem matters in fixed-rate markets. A lender may want a specific rate and maturity, but there is no guarantee a matching borrower appears immediately. Until an order is filled, capital can become economically idle.
@TermMax has been working on this problem by combining fixed-rate order flow with vault-based capital management and external integrations. One documented example is its Morpho integration, where unmatched vault capital can earn variable-rate yield elsewhere and be pulled back when a TermMax fixed-rate order executes.
The idea is straightforward: capital waiting for the “right” fixed-rate opportunity does not necessarily need to earn zero in the meantime.
Imagine a vault has $100,000 available for fixed-rate lending, but only $60,000 is currently matched. If the remaining $40,000 can earn yield while waiting rather than sitting dormant, capital efficiency improves.
The tradeoff is that every extra layer introduces another dependency. Using an external protocol can reduce idle capital, but it also adds external smart-contract, liquidity, and market risk.
This is one of the more interesting design questions in fixed-income DeFi: the best rate is not enough if the capital spends too much time waiting.
@TermMax #TermMax
A lending strategy can advertise an attractive rate and still waste capital if too much money sits unused while waiting for borrowers.
That problem matters in fixed-rate markets. A lender may want a specific rate and maturity, but there is no guarantee a matching borrower appears immediately. Until an order is filled, capital can become economically idle.
@TermMax has been working on this problem by combining fixed-rate order flow with vault-based capital management and external integrations. One documented example is its Morpho integration, where unmatched vault capital can earn variable-rate yield elsewhere and be pulled back when a TermMax fixed-rate order executes.
The idea is straightforward: capital waiting for the “right” fixed-rate opportunity does not necessarily need to earn zero in the meantime.
Imagine a vault has $100,000 available for fixed-rate lending, but only $60,000 is currently matched. If the remaining $40,000 can earn yield while waiting rather than sitting dormant, capital efficiency improves.
The tradeoff is that every extra layer introduces another dependency. Using an external protocol can reduce idle capital, but it also adds external smart-contract, liquidity, and market risk.
This is one of the more interesting design questions in fixed-income DeFi: the best rate is not enough if the capital spends too much time waiting.
@TermMax #TermMax
翻訳参照
Who Really Controls a TermMax Vault? A Deep Dive Into the Curator Model
A DeFi vault can look passive from the outside, but the important question is simple: who is making the allocation decisions behind the scenes?
On @TermMax , vaults let users deposit capital into a managed strategy instead of manually placing fixed-rate orders across different markets. The key actor is the curator.
The curator is responsible for how vault capital is deployed: which markets to quote, how liquidity is allocated, and how strategy parameters are managed within the vault’s rules. That can improve usability because depositors do not need to actively manage every maturity or lending opportunity themselves.
But delegation changes the risk profile.
A vault can function exactly as designed while still producing weak results if the curator prices risk badly, concentrates exposure, or allocates into markets that become illiquid. Smart-contract risk and curator decision risk are separate issues.
Think of it like hiring an on-chain fixed-income manager. You are not only evaluating the protocol; you are also evaluating the person or strategy controlling capital allocation.
That is why I would look at a TermMax vault through three lenses: strategy transparency, concentration, and how the curator behaves when market conditions change.
#termmax @TermMax
A DeFi vault can look passive from the outside, but the important question is simple: who is making the allocation decisions behind the scenes?
On @TermMax , vaults let users deposit capital into a managed strategy instead of manually placing fixed-rate orders across different markets. The key actor is the curator.
The curator is responsible for how vault capital is deployed: which markets to quote, how liquidity is allocated, and how strategy parameters are managed within the vault’s rules. That can improve usability because depositors do not need to actively manage every maturity or lending opportunity themselves.
But delegation changes the risk profile.
A vault can function exactly as designed while still producing weak results if the curator prices risk badly, concentrates exposure, or allocates into markets that become illiquid. Smart-contract risk and curator decision risk are separate issues.
Think of it like hiring an on-chain fixed-income manager. You are not only evaluating the protocol; you are also evaluating the person or strategy controlling capital allocation.
That is why I would look at a TermMax vault through three lenses: strategy transparency, concentration, and how the curator behaves when market conditions change.
#termmax @TermMax
TermMaxの金庫（ヴォルト）を覗く：パッシブ資本はどのように運用されるのか
DeFiのヴォルトへの入金は、外から見ると簡単に思える。
資金を預けると、ヴォルトがそれを運用し、その結果として得られる利回りを受け取る。
しかし難しいのは裏側だ。
<a>@TermMax </a>のヴォルトは、キュレーターによって管理されており、預け入れられた資本を、対応するマーケットの中でどのように配分するかが決められる。
仕事は、資金の投下先を選び、エクスポージャーを管理し、配分を調整し、市場環境の変化に対応することを含む。
それにより、2つの役割がはっきり分かれる。
預金者は資本を提供する。
キュレーターは戦略を運用する。
自分であらゆるレンディング市場を逐一監視したくないユーザーにとって、この仕組みは参加をはるかに現実的にできる。
TermMaxは、この考えをアイドル・リクイディティ（余剰流動性）でさらに一歩進める。
投入を待っている資本は、必ずしも動かずに放置される必要はない。ヴォルトの戦略は、アイドル資金を確立されたレンディングの場に振り向け、新しいTermMaxの機会を待っている間も利回りを稼ぎ続けられる。
これは、思う以上に重要だ。
ヴォルトは強力な戦略を持っていても、多くの資本が長期間未使用のままだと効率が落ちてしまう。
キュレーターのモデルは、資本配分を「セットして忘れる」ものではなく、能動的なプロセスとして扱うことで、その問題を解決しようとしている。
それでもユーザーは、キュレーターや戦略、そして関わるリスクを判断する必要がある。管理されたヴォルトはリスクをなくすわけではない。
ただし提供できるのは、すべてのポジションを手作業で管理することなく、よりアクティブな固定金利戦略へアクセスする手段だ。
@TermMax #TermMax
DeFiのヴォルトへの入金は、外から見ると簡単に思える。
資金を預けると、ヴォルトがそれを運用し、その結果として得られる利回りを受け取る。
しかし難しいのは裏側だ。
<a>@TermMax </a>のヴォルトは、キュレーターによって管理されており、預け入れられた資本を、対応するマーケットの中でどのように配分するかが決められる。
仕事は、資金の投下先を選び、エクスポージャーを管理し、配分を調整し、市場環境の変化に対応することを含む。
それにより、2つの役割がはっきり分かれる。
預金者は資本を提供する。
キュレーターは戦略を運用する。
自分であらゆるレンディング市場を逐一監視したくないユーザーにとって、この仕組みは参加をはるかに現実的にできる。
TermMaxは、この考えをアイドル・リクイディティ（余剰流動性）でさらに一歩進める。
投入を待っている資本は、必ずしも動かずに放置される必要はない。ヴォルトの戦略は、アイドル資金を確立されたレンディングの場に振り向け、新しいTermMaxの機会を待っている間も利回りを稼ぎ続けられる。
これは、思う以上に重要だ。
ヴォルトは強力な戦略を持っていても、多くの資本が長期間未使用のままだと効率が落ちてしまう。
キュレーターのモデルは、資本配分を「セットして忘れる」ものではなく、能動的なプロセスとして扱うことで、その問題を解決しようとしている。
それでもユーザーは、キュレーターや戦略、そして関わるリスクを判断する必要がある。管理されたヴォルトはリスクをなくすわけではない。
ただし提供できるのは、すべてのポジションを手作業で管理することなく、よりアクティブな固定金利戦略へアクセスする手段だ。
@TermMax #TermMax
翻訳参照
TermMax vs Variable-Rate Lending: What Actually Changes for the User?
Most DeFi lending markets use floating rates.
That means the rate you see when you enter a position may not be the rate you keep paying or earning. If demand for borrowing rises, costs can move quickly. If liquidity floods the market, lender yields can drop.
@TermMax changes that setup by giving users fixed rates tied to a specific maturity.
For a borrower, the main difference is simple: the financing cost is known from the start.
If you are building a strategy that lasts several weeks or months, that matters. You can calculate your expected borrowing cost before committing capital instead of constantly watching a changing APY.
For lenders, fixed rates create a clearer return profile. Rather than depending entirely on future utilization levels, users can choose a rate and maturity that fits their own time horizon.
Variable-rate lending still has a place. It can work well for users who want flexibility or expect rates to move in their favor.
Fixed-rate lending serves a different need: predictability.
That distinction becomes more meaningful as DeFi attracts traders, treasuries, funds, and users who care about planning capital over a defined period.
The real value of #TermMax is not that fixed rates are automatically better than floating rates.
It is that users finally get another choice.
@TermMax #termma
Most DeFi lending markets use floating rates.
That means the rate you see when you enter a position may not be the rate you keep paying or earning. If demand for borrowing rises, costs can move quickly. If liquidity floods the market, lender yields can drop.
@TermMax changes that setup by giving users fixed rates tied to a specific maturity.
For a borrower, the main difference is simple: the financing cost is known from the start.
If you are building a strategy that lasts several weeks or months, that matters. You can calculate your expected borrowing cost before committing capital instead of constantly watching a changing APY.
For lenders, fixed rates create a clearer return profile. Rather than depending entirely on future utilization levels, users can choose a rate and maturity that fits their own time horizon.
Variable-rate lending still has a place. It can work well for users who want flexibility or expect rates to move in their favor.
Fixed-rate lending serves a different need: predictability.
That distinction becomes more meaningful as DeFi attracts traders, treasuries, funds, and users who care about planning capital over a defined period.
The real value of #TermMax is not that fixed rates are automatically better than floating rates.
It is that users finally get another choice.
@TermMax #termma
翻訳参照
Why Fixed-Rate DeFi Could Matter More Than You Think | @TermMax
Most DeFi lending starts with a simple trade-off: you get open access to capital, but the interest rate can change while your position is still active.
That uncertainty matters more than people think.
A borrower may enter a strategy when rates look cheap, only to see borrowing costs rise later. A lender can face the opposite problem. An attractive yield can fall as market conditions change.
@TermMax takes a different route.
TermMax lets borrowers and lenders lock a rate for a defined term. That gives both sides something DeFi often lacks: a clearer view of future cash flows.
For borrowers, this makes the cost of capital easier to calculate before opening a position. For lenders, it creates more certainty around the return attached to a specific maturity.
The interesting part is not simply fixed interest.
It is what predictable rates can make possible.
Treasuries can plan financing with fewer moving pieces. Traders can structure positions around a known borrowing cost. Yield-focused users can compare opportunities without relying only on whatever variable APY happens to be displayed that day.
TermMax also uses curated vaults, where depositors can delegate capital management to experienced curators who allocate funds across supported markets. Idle capital can be routed toward other lending venues rather than sitting unused.
Fixed-rate lending will not remove market risk, liquidation risk, or smart-contract risk. What it can remove is one major unknown from the equation: the interest rate during the agreed term.
That makes TermMax interesting for a simple reason. DeFi has spent years making capital more accessible. #TermMax is working on making the cost of that capital more predictable.
#termmax @TermMax
Most DeFi lending starts with a simple trade-off: you get open access to capital, but the interest rate can change while your position is still active.
That uncertainty matters more than people think.
A borrower may enter a strategy when rates look cheap, only to see borrowing costs rise later. A lender can face the opposite problem. An attractive yield can fall as market conditions change.
@TermMax takes a different route.
TermMax lets borrowers and lenders lock a rate for a defined term. That gives both sides something DeFi often lacks: a clearer view of future cash flows.
For borrowers, this makes the cost of capital easier to calculate before opening a position. For lenders, it creates more certainty around the return attached to a specific maturity.
The interesting part is not simply fixed interest.
It is what predictable rates can make possible.
Treasuries can plan financing with fewer moving pieces. Traders can structure positions around a known borrowing cost. Yield-focused users can compare opportunities without relying only on whatever variable APY happens to be displayed that day.
TermMax also uses curated vaults, where depositors can delegate capital management to experienced curators who allocate funds across supported markets. Idle capital can be routed toward other lending venues rather than sitting unused.
Fixed-rate lending will not remove market risk, liquidation risk, or smart-contract risk. What it can remove is one major unknown from the equation: the interest rate during the agreed term.
That makes TermMax interesting for a simple reason. DeFi has spent years making capital more accessible. #TermMax is working on making the cost of that capital more predictable.
#termmax @TermMax
翻訳参照
Can Bitcoin Become Productive Without Leaving Bitcoin?
For years, bringing Bitcoin into DeFi has usually meant accepting a difficult trade-off: bridge it, wrap it, hand custody to another party, or leave it sitting idle.
@BabylonLabs_io Trustless Bitcoin Vaults introduce a more interesting approach.
The idea is to keep BTC locked on the Bitcoin network while allowing it to be used as collateral in DeFi applications. Instead of relying on a traditional custodian or wrapped version of Bitcoin, the system uses programmable vaults and cryptographic proofs to manage how the locked BTC can be released.
This could shift the conversation from:
“Which company is holding my Bitcoin?”
to:
“Can the protocol cryptographically prove that the agreed conditions were met?”
That distinction matters. Bitcoin’s next chapter may not be about moving BTC across every available chain. It may be about unlocking greater capital utility while preserving the security and ownership principles that made Bitcoin valuable in the first place.
The real success of this model will depend on security, reliable withdrawals, transparent risk management, and its ability to work under real market conditions. Still, Trustless Bitcoin Vaults offer a compelling direction for Bitcoin-powered finance.
#baby $BABY @BabylonLabs_io
For years, bringing Bitcoin into DeFi has usually meant accepting a difficult trade-off: bridge it, wrap it, hand custody to another party, or leave it sitting idle.
@BabylonLabs_io Trustless Bitcoin Vaults introduce a more interesting approach.
The idea is to keep BTC locked on the Bitcoin network while allowing it to be used as collateral in DeFi applications. Instead of relying on a traditional custodian or wrapped version of Bitcoin, the system uses programmable vaults and cryptographic proofs to manage how the locked BTC can be released.
This could shift the conversation from:
“Which company is holding my Bitcoin?”
to:
“Can the protocol cryptographically prove that the agreed conditions were met?”
That distinction matters. Bitcoin’s next chapter may not be about moving BTC across every available chain. It may be about unlocking greater capital utility while preserving the security and ownership principles that made Bitcoin valuable in the first place.
The real success of this model will depend on security, reliable withdrawals, transparent risk management, and its ability to work under real market conditions. Still, Trustless Bitcoin Vaults offer a compelling direction for Bitcoin-powered finance.
#baby $BABY @BabylonLabs_io
翻訳参照
The @grvt_io (https://www.binance.com/en/square/profile/grvt_io) CreatorPad campaign is not only about posting more, but about creating useful and relevant content. #grvt
The leaderboard reward is calculated proportionally:
Your reward = Your points ÷ Total points of the Top 300 creators × 125,000 GRVT
To qualify, creators must rank in the Global Top 300 at the July 14, 2026, 23:59 UTC snapshot. Leaderboard data may have a T+2 delay, so the displayed ranking might not update immediately.
Eligible creators must also verify the Binance Square task inside Binance Wallet on July 17 between 03:00 and 23:59 UTC. The path is:
Binance Wallet → Discover → Booster → GRVT → Binance Square Task → Complete Now → Verify
Originality, relevance, and timing matter. Red Packet or giveaway posts earn zero points, while copied, duplicated, edited, or irrelevant posts may also be disqualified. Quality content beats repetitive posting.
#grvt
The leaderboard reward is calculated proportionally:
Your reward = Your points ÷ Total points of the Top 300 creators × 125,000 GRVT
To qualify, creators must rank in the Global Top 300 at the July 14, 2026, 23:59 UTC snapshot. Leaderboard data may have a T+2 delay, so the displayed ranking might not update immediately.
Eligible creators must also verify the Binance Square task inside Binance Wallet on July 17 between 03:00 and 23:59 UTC. The path is:
Binance Wallet → Discover → Booster → GRVT → Binance Square Task → Complete Now → Verify
Originality, relevance, and timing matter. Red Packet or giveaway posts earn zero points, while copied, duplicated, edited, or irrelevant posts may also be disqualified. Quality content beats repetitive posting.
#grvt
翻訳参照
What if traders did not have to choose between speed and control of their assets?
@grvt_io is a hybrid crypto exchange designed to combine the familiar performance of centralized platforms with the self-custody model of decentralized finance. GRVT matches orders off-chain for faster execution, while trades and fund movements are settled on-chain through ZK-powered infrastructure.
Unlike a traditional centralized exchange, GRVT is designed so users retain control of their funds instead of relying entirely on the platform as custodian. Compared with many fully on-chain exchanges, its hybrid order-book model aims to provide a smoother trading experience while preserving verifiable settlement and privacy.
This does not remove trading or smart-contract risk, but it offers an interesting middle ground between convenience and control.
Could hybrid exchanges become the next major step in crypto trading?
#grvt
@grvt_io is a hybrid crypto exchange designed to combine the familiar performance of centralized platforms with the self-custody model of decentralized finance. GRVT matches orders off-chain for faster execution, while trades and fund movements are settled on-chain through ZK-powered infrastructure.
Unlike a traditional centralized exchange, GRVT is designed so users retain control of their funds instead of relying entirely on the platform as custodian. Compared with many fully on-chain exchanges, its hybrid order-book model aims to provide a smoother trading experience while preserving verifiable settlement and privacy.
This does not remove trading or smart-contract risk, but it offers an interesting middle ground between convenience and control.
Could hybrid exchanges become the next major step in crypto trading?
#grvt
翻訳参照
GRVT and the Problem of Fragmented Capital
One reason I started exploring @grvt_io is that most financial platforms force users to divide their capital between separate activities.
A trader may keep one balance for margin, move another portion into an earning product, and use a different platform for investment opportunities. Every transfer adds friction, while capital assigned to one activity may become unavailable for another.
$GRVT is taking a different approach through its One Balance model. The idea is to connect earning, investing, and trading around the same self-custodial balance instead of making users manage several disconnected accounts.
This matters because capital efficiency is not only about chasing a higher return. It is also about reducing unnecessary movement, keeping funds useful, and giving users clearer control over how their money is deployed.
$GRVT also provides access to markets linked to crypto and real-world assets such as gold, oil, and stocks through perpetual contracts. Bringing these markets together with earning and investment tools could create a more complete on-chain financial experience.
However, the concept should still be judged by execution. Reliable liquidity, transparent risk management, platform security, stable withdrawals, and a simple user experience will matter more than any ambitious roadmap.
What interests me most is not the number of features GRVT can add. It is whether those features can work together without making financial risk harder for an ordinary user to understand.
In my view, the strongest platforms will not simply offer more products. They will make capital easier to manage while allowing users to maintain meaningful control over it.
Which part of GRVT’s One Balance approach do you find most useful: earning, investing, or trading?
#grvt
One reason I started exploring @grvt_io is that most financial platforms force users to divide their capital between separate activities.
A trader may keep one balance for margin, move another portion into an earning product, and use a different platform for investment opportunities. Every transfer adds friction, while capital assigned to one activity may become unavailable for another.
$GRVT is taking a different approach through its One Balance model. The idea is to connect earning, investing, and trading around the same self-custodial balance instead of making users manage several disconnected accounts.
This matters because capital efficiency is not only about chasing a higher return. It is also about reducing unnecessary movement, keeping funds useful, and giving users clearer control over how their money is deployed.
$GRVT also provides access to markets linked to crypto and real-world assets such as gold, oil, and stocks through perpetual contracts. Bringing these markets together with earning and investment tools could create a more complete on-chain financial experience.
However, the concept should still be judged by execution. Reliable liquidity, transparent risk management, platform security, stable withdrawals, and a simple user experience will matter more than any ambitious roadmap.
What interests me most is not the number of features GRVT can add. It is whether those features can work together without making financial risk harder for an ordinary user to understand.
In my view, the strongest platforms will not simply offer more products. They will make capital easier to manage while allowing users to maintain meaningful control over it.
Which part of GRVT’s One Balance approach do you find most useful: earning, investing, or trading?
#grvt
Introducing #BuildWithYou Tagline Contest ✍️
Everyone’s got their own definition of Binance. Yours might just be the one that sticks 👀
Finish the sentence: “Binance is…” 👇
3 simple steps:
👉 Follow @binance on X + repost
👉 Comment your tagline idea with #BuildWithYou
👉 Complete survey → binance.com/en/survey/deeb…
Top 20 entries win 100 USDC each. Ends 21 Nov 23:59 UTC.
Everyone’s got their own definition of Binance. Yours might just be the one that sticks 👀
Finish the sentence: “Binance is…” 👇
3 simple steps:
👉 Follow @binance on X + repost
👉 Comment your tagline idea with #BuildWithYou
👉 Complete survey → binance.com/en/survey/deeb…
Top 20 entries win 100 USDC each. Ends 21 Nov 23:59 UTC.
🚨 バイナンス新チャレンジアラート 🚨
バイナンスが#BuildWithYou の壁紙ドロップを開始しました 🎨📱
誇りを持って使えるバイナンステーマの壁紙（モバイルまたはデスクトップ）をデザインしてください！
💰 トップ20の勝者にはそれぞれ100 USDCが贈られます
📌 参加方法:
1️⃣ X（ツイッター）でバイナンスの公式をいいね + リポスト
2️⃣ #BuildWithYouとともにアイデアをコメント
3️⃣ このSurvey.を完了
⏰ 締切: 10月3日、23:59 UTC
私も参加します – 誰が参加しますか？ 何か素晴らしいものを作りましょう！
#wallpapers
バイナンスが#BuildWithYou の壁紙ドロップを開始しました 🎨📱
誇りを持って使えるバイナンステーマの壁紙（モバイルまたはデスクトップ）をデザインしてください！
💰 トップ20の勝者にはそれぞれ100 USDCが贈られます
📌 参加方法:
1️⃣ X（ツイッター）でバイナンスの公式をいいね + リポスト
2️⃣ #BuildWithYouとともにアイデアをコメント
3️⃣ このSurvey.を完了
⏰ 締切: 10月3日、23:59 UTC
私も参加します – 誰が参加しますか？ 何か素晴らしいものを作りましょう！
#wallpapers
🚨 新しいギブアウェイのお知らせ by Binance 🚨
Binanceは2025年第4四半期のためのエキサイティングな活動を開始しました 👉 #AskBinance
当選者はそれぞれ200 USDCを受け取ります 💸
📌 参加方法:
1️⃣ X（Twitter）でBinanceの公式アカウントを「いいね」+ 再投稿する
2️⃣ あなたの質問を#askbinance と一緒にコメントする
3️⃣ このSurveyを完了する
⏰ 締切: 10月5日 23:59 UTC
私はすでに参加しています – チャンスを逃さないで、今すぐ参加してください！ 🚀
Binanceは2025年第4四半期のためのエキサイティングな活動を開始しました 👉 #AskBinance
当選者はそれぞれ200 USDCを受け取ります 💸
📌 参加方法:
1️⃣ X（Twitter）でBinanceの公式アカウントを「いいね」+ 再投稿する
2️⃣ あなたの質問を#askbinance と一緒にコメントする
3️⃣ このSurveyを完了する
⏰ 締切: 10月5日 23:59 UTC
私はすでに参加しています – チャンスを逃さないで、今すぐ参加してください！ 🚀
暗号通貨で人生を変える経験をしたことがありますか？ 🚀
バイナンスは #HumansOfBinance キャンペーンを実施しており、あなたも *$400 USDC* を受け取る20人のうちの1人になることができます！
バイナンスや暗号通貨があなたの人生にどんな形であれ、インスピレーションを与えた場合—大きいものであれ小さいものであれ—これはあなたの物語を世界と共有するチャンスです 🌍💛
🔹 Xで @binance をフォロー
🔹 公式投稿にあなたの物語をコメントして
🔹 こちらのフォームに記入してください: https://www.binance.com/en/survey/5424e9adc96d481087d8a9eb1c4cba7f
暗号通貨はチャート以上のものであることを世界に示しましょう—それは本当の人々と本当の物語についてです。 💬🔥
#HumansOfBinance
バイナンスは #HumansOfBinance キャンペーンを実施しており、あなたも *$400 USDC* を受け取る20人のうちの1人になることができます！
バイナンスや暗号通貨があなたの人生にどんな形であれ、インスピレーションを与えた場合—大きいものであれ小さいものであれ—これはあなたの物語を世界と共有するチャンスです 🌍💛
🔹 Xで @binance をフォロー
🔹 公式投稿にあなたの物語をコメントして
🔹 こちらのフォームに記入してください: https://www.binance.com/en/survey/5424e9adc96d481087d8a9eb1c4cba7f
暗号通貨はチャート以上のものであることを世界に示しましょう—それは本当の人々と本当の物語についてです。 💬🔥
#HumansOfBinance
毎晩9時
指数爆炸
·
--
実況帯単、犬庄を捉えろ！
30000
引用されたコンテンツは削除されました
2
0x范德彪
·
--
3億回の接続の「信頼の橋」：QRコードから全連携へ
@WalletConnect の基盤となる能力は、ユーザーがdAppを開くたびに表示されるQRコードやディープリンクに隠されています。あなたがスマートフォンのウォレット（例えばTrust Wallet）でdApp（例えばUniswapのウェブ版）のQRコードをスキャンすると、瞬時にエンドツーエンドの暗号化された通信チャネルが確立されます——助記詞を繰り返し入力する必要もなく、中間者によるデータの盗難を心配する必要もありません。このプロトコルはWeb3の世界の「ユニバーサル翻訳機」のようなもので、Ethereum、Solana、Polygonなどの主要なブロックチェーンをサポートし、異なるウォレットとdAppが障害なく対話できるようにします。
現在、#WalletConnect ネットワークは4700万以上のユーザーを蓄積し、600以上のウォレット（老舗のMetaMaskから新興のSolflareまで）と67,000以上のプロジェクト（DeFi、NFT、GameFi全トラックをカバー）を通じて3億回の接続を実現しました。大口取引がUniswapで大額の注文を操作する場合でも、コレクターがOpenSeaで希少なNFTを閲覧する場合でも、その背後にはWalletConnectの静かな守護があります。
$WCT
@WalletConnect の基盤となる能力は、ユーザーがdAppを開くたびに表示されるQRコードやディープリンクに隠されています。あなたがスマートフォンのウォレット（例えばTrust Wallet）でdApp（例えばUniswapのウェブ版）のQRコードをスキャンすると、瞬時にエンドツーエンドの暗号化された通信チャネルが確立されます——助記詞を繰り返し入力する必要もなく、中間者によるデータの盗難を心配する必要もありません。このプロトコルはWeb3の世界の「ユニバーサル翻訳機」のようなもので、Ethereum、Solana、Polygonなどの主要なブロックチェーンをサポートし、異なるウォレットとdAppが障害なく対話できるようにします。
現在、#WalletConnect ネットワークは4700万以上のユーザーを蓄積し、600以上のウォレット（老舗のMetaMaskから新興のSolflareまで）と67,000以上のプロジェクト（DeFi、NFT、GameFi全トラックをカバー）を通じて3億回の接続を実現しました。大口取引がUniswapで大額の注文を操作する場合でも、コレクターがOpenSeaで希少なNFTを閲覧する場合でも、その背後にはWalletConnectの静かな守護があります。
$WCT
🚨 #AskBinance キャンペーンがX（Twitter）でライブ中です！ 🐦
バイナンスはあなたの声を聞きたい — 質問をして200 USDCを獲得するチャンスを掴もう！ 💬💸
以下の3つの簡単なステップに従ってください：
1️⃣ Xで元の投稿をいいね + リポスト
2️⃣ ハッシュタグ#AskBinance を付けて質問をコメント
3️⃣ アンケートに回答 👉 https://binance.com/en/survey/fabbd631c0ce4507b6c1373d91b316ba
🕒 締切：7月27日、23:59 UTC
お見逃しなく！ 🚀
#バイナンス #暗号コミュニティ #バイナンススクエア
バイナンスはあなたの声を聞きたい — 質問をして200 USDCを獲得するチャンスを掴もう！ 💬💸
以下の3つの簡単なステップに従ってください：
1️⃣ Xで元の投稿をいいね + リポスト
2️⃣ ハッシュタグ#AskBinance を付けて質問をコメント
3️⃣ アンケートに回答 👉 https://binance.com/en/survey/fabbd631c0ce4507b6c1373d91b316ba
🕒 締切：7月27日、23:59 UTC
お見逃しなく！ 🚀
#バイナンス #暗号コミュニティ #バイナンススクエア
ログインして、さらにコンテンツを読む