Binance Square
#balancer

balancer

97,433 views
208 Discussing
News Crypto IN
·
--
See translation
$BAL holders just voted to wind down Balancer, a protocol that once held $3B in TVL. BIP-928 passed. Pools stay open for withdrawals until Oct 30, and the V3 Vault pauses Nov 30. The chain of events is brutal. Nov 3, 2025: an attacker exploits a rounding error in the "upscale" function of Composable Stable Pools, a precision-loss bug in how Solidity handles integer division at specific balance thresholds. $128M gone in one transaction. TVL drops 46% in a day, from $770M to $422M, and keeps bleeding to about $58M today. Monthly protocol revenue falls from $1.13M in October 2025 to $56,781 by August 2026. Balancer Labs, the corporate entity, shut down in March. This wasn't a rug pull or a founder running off. It was audited code, a known team, years of operating history, and a math bug nobody caught until $128M was gone. That's the uncomfortable read for DeFi generally: audits and reputation reduce risk, they don't remove it. A single exploit erased a $3B protocol's reason to exist, not because the treasury ran dry, but because users stopped trusting the pools enough to keep using them. Balancer isn't the first "blue chip" DeFi protocol to fold after a hack, and it won't be the last. If a protocol this established can be ended by one bug, what exactly does "battle-tested" mean in DeFi? #Balancer #DeFi
$BAL holders just voted to wind down Balancer, a protocol that once held $3B in TVL. BIP-928 passed. Pools stay open for withdrawals until Oct 30, and the V3 Vault pauses Nov 30.

The chain of events is brutal. Nov 3, 2025: an attacker exploits a rounding error in the "upscale" function of Composable Stable Pools, a precision-loss bug in how Solidity handles integer division at specific balance thresholds. $128M gone in one transaction. TVL drops 46% in a day, from $770M to $422M, and keeps bleeding to about $58M today. Monthly protocol revenue falls from $1.13M in October 2025 to $56,781 by August 2026. Balancer Labs, the corporate entity, shut down in March.

This wasn't a rug pull or a founder running off. It was audited code, a known team, years of operating history, and a math bug nobody caught until $128M was gone.

That's the uncomfortable read for DeFi generally: audits and reputation reduce risk, they don't remove it. A single exploit erased a $3B protocol's reason to exist, not because the treasury ran dry, but because users stopped trusting the pools enough to keep using them.

Balancer isn't the first "blue chip" DeFi protocol to fold after a hack, and it won't be the last.

If a protocol this established can be ended by one bug, what exactly does "battle-tested" mean in DeFi?

#Balancer #DeFi
·
--
The fate of #Balancer is finally sealed. Token holders have passed the BIP-928 shutdown proposal, while rejecting the “official fork” proposal. The timeline is set: the pause pool will switch to withdrawals-only starting October 30, and the V3 pool will be paused on November 30. BAL token holders won’t be able to start redeeming treasury assets until the end of May 2027. One of the largest AMMs ever has officially entered the liquidation countdown.
The fate of #Balancer is finally sealed.

Token holders have passed the BIP-928 shutdown proposal, while rejecting the “official fork” proposal.

The timeline is set: the pause pool will switch to withdrawals-only starting October 30, and the V3 pool will be paused on November 30. BAL token holders won’t be able to start redeeming treasury assets until the end of May 2027.

One of the largest AMMs ever has officially entered the liquidation countdown.
Removed ads/source and optimized to the following tweets ready for direct posting: ```text The Balancer community has passed the ordered shutdown proposal BIP-928. The fork proposal BIP-929 was not approved. The existing liquidity pools will run until 10/30, and users can withdraw at any time. Certain V3 pools may be eligible to request an extension until 11/30, with the deadline on 10/16. Starting 10/30, the related pools will be converted to withdrawal-only, and the bug bounty ends. On 11/30, the V3 Vault will be paused. The contracts are non-custodial, and withdrawals do not depend on the project’s operations; BAL holders do not need to take any action. Starting at the end of May 2027, BAL can be destroyed in exchange for a proportional share of the DAO treasury assets. The specific date will be announced two weeks in advance. The official team will publish an exit guide. #Balancer #BAL ```
Removed ads/source and optimized to the following tweets ready for direct posting:

```text
The Balancer community has passed the ordered shutdown proposal BIP-928. The fork proposal BIP-929 was not approved.

The existing liquidity pools will run until 10/30, and users can withdraw at any time. Certain V3 pools may be eligible to request an extension until 11/30, with the deadline on 10/16.

Starting 10/30, the related pools will be converted to withdrawal-only, and the bug bounty ends. On 11/30, the V3 Vault will be paused.

The contracts are non-custodial, and withdrawals do not depend on the project’s operations; BAL holders do not need to take any action.

Starting at the end of May 2027, BAL can be destroyed in exchange for a proportional share of the DAO treasury assets. The specific date will be announced two weeks in advance. The official team will publish an exit guide.

#Balancer #BAL
```
·
--
Bullish
Verified
See translation
🚨 BALANCER RECOVERY PROPOSAL 🚨 Balancer’s proposal would distribute 296.4017 ETH (~$1.39M historically) to LPs across 120 legacy pools. 👀 ⚠️ Still needs a governance vote ❗ No guaranteed full reimbursement yet 📌 Claim details only if the proposal passes Will BAL recover from here? 👇 ✅ RECOVERY / ⚠️ UNCERTAIN / ❌ TOO LATE Source: Binance News | NS3.AI $BAL $ETH #balancer #Ethereum #crypto #BinanceSquare
🚨 BALANCER RECOVERY PROPOSAL 🚨
Balancer’s proposal would distribute 296.4017 ETH (~$1.39M historically) to LPs across 120 legacy pools. 👀
⚠️ Still needs a governance vote
❗ No guaranteed full reimbursement yet
📌 Claim details only if the proposal passes
Will BAL recover from here? 👇
✅ RECOVERY / ⚠️ UNCERTAIN / ❌ TOO LATE
Source: Binance News | NS3.AI
$BAL $ETH #balancer #Ethereum #crypto #BinanceSquare
See translation
$BAL Balancer just proposed shutting itself down completely. After the November 2025 exploit drained $128M, monthly revenue never recovered, falling from $1.13M to just $56K by August. Now they're canceling their own buyback program and instead distributing $9M+ in treasury directly to $BAL holders who burn their tokens. Implied value per token sits at $0.13, above the current $0.11 spot price. Sometimes the most honest move a protocol can make is admitting it's over. #balancer #bal #defi
$BAL Balancer just proposed shutting itself down completely. After the November 2025 exploit drained $128M, monthly revenue never recovered, falling from $1.13M to just $56K by August. Now they're canceling their own buyback program and instead distributing $9M+ in treasury directly to $BAL holders who burn their tokens. Implied value per token sits at $0.13, above the current $0.11 spot price. Sometimes the most honest move a protocol can make is admitting it's over.
#balancer #bal #defi
See translation
DeFi Milestone: Is Balancer Facing the End of the Road? 🚨 One of DeFi’s pioneer liquidity protocols, Balancer, is reportedly evaluating a potential protocol wind-down after a recent organizational restructuring failed to revive protocol revenue. Here are the key takeaways: • Revenue Shortfall: Recent structural changes failed to generate the sustained trading volume and fee growth needed for long-term protocol sustainability. • Wind-Down Discussions: Governance conversations are increasingly focusing on an orderly sunsetting of operations to protect user liquidity and remaining resources. • Industry Reality Check: The development underscores the fierce competition and shifting market dynamics facing early-generation automated market makers in today's market. Is this a sign of broader consolidation coming to legacy DeFi protocols? Share your perspective in the comments below! 💬 #DeFi #CryptoNews #Balancer #Binance Risk Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Digital asset trading involves significant market risk. Always conduct your own independent research before making any investment decisions.
DeFi Milestone: Is Balancer Facing the End of the Road? 🚨

One of DeFi’s pioneer liquidity protocols, Balancer, is reportedly evaluating a potential protocol wind-down after a recent organizational restructuring failed to revive protocol revenue.

Here are the key takeaways:

• Revenue Shortfall: Recent structural changes failed to generate the sustained trading volume and fee growth needed for long-term protocol sustainability.

• Wind-Down Discussions: Governance conversations are increasingly focusing on an orderly sunsetting of operations to protect user liquidity and remaining resources.

• Industry Reality Check: The development underscores the fierce competition and shifting market dynamics facing early-generation automated market makers in today's market.

Is this a sign of broader consolidation coming to legacy DeFi protocols? Share your perspective in the comments below! 💬

#DeFi #CryptoNews #Balancer #Binance

Risk Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Digital asset trading involves significant market risk. Always conduct your own independent research before making any investment decisions.
·
--
Balancer proposes shutdown: treasury still has over $9 million, to be distributed to $BAL holdersWhat’s worth watching isn’t yet another “protocol is dying,” but rather: reconstruction is done, the product has been delivered, yet the revenue still doesn’t come back. According to Cointelegraph, Balancer Labs CEO Marcus Hardt proposed an orderly shutdown of the protocol at a governance forum on Monday, and distributed the remaining treasury (currently worth more than $9 million) proportionally to $BAL holders. The context is that after an attack of about $128 million on the November 2025 v2 composable stable pools, the Labs were shut down in March and operations were streamlined—costs were cut, but v3 didn’t bring the revenue back. DefiLlama data: the protocol’s revenue for the attack month fell from about $1.13 million in October to about $371,000 in November; by August 2026 it was down to roughly $56,800. The gist of Hardt’s own words is: the product can work, but it doesn’t sell enough; he underestimated the long-tail impact of the attack on the brand and adoption.

Balancer proposes shutdown: treasury still has over $9 million, to be distributed to $BAL holders

What’s worth watching isn’t yet another “protocol is dying,” but rather: reconstruction is done, the product has been delivered, yet the revenue still doesn’t come back.
According to Cointelegraph, Balancer Labs CEO Marcus Hardt proposed an orderly shutdown of the protocol at a governance forum on Monday, and distributed the remaining treasury (currently worth more than $9 million) proportionally to $BAL holders. The context is that after an attack of about $128 million on the November 2025 v2 composable stable pools, the Labs were shut down in March and operations were streamlined—costs were cut, but v3 didn’t bring the revenue back.
DefiLlama data: the protocol’s revenue for the attack month fell from about $1.13 million in October to about $371,000 in November; by August 2026 it was down to roughly $56,800. The gist of Hardt’s own words is: the product can work, but it doesn’t sell enough; he underestimated the long-tail impact of the attack on the brand and adoption.
The DeFi giant Balancer, which once managed $3 billion in assets, is now considering winding down! A vote at the end of September will decide its fate, while BAL token holders' claims won't be processed until May 2027. Wow, that's basically telling the market "our project might be done," but gives holders 4 years to figure things out. Technically, BAL could face selling pressure, but given the long timeline until final execution, it might not collapse immediately. Who would hold a token knowing the project is being shut down? Short-term might see some bounce opportunities, but mid-term outlook is bearish. Token holders, be cautious. #DeFi #Balancer $BAL The DeFi giant Balancer, once managing $3 billion in assets, is now considering winding down! A vote at the end of September will decide its fate, while BAL token holders' claims won't be processed until May 2027. Wow, that's basically telling the market "our project might be done," but gives holders 4 years to figure things out. Technically, BAL could face selling pressure, but given the long timeline until final execution, it might not collapse immediately. Who would hold a token knowing the project is being shut down? Short-term might see some bounce opportunities, but mid-term outlook is bearish. Token holders, be cautious. #DeFi #Balancer $BAL
The DeFi giant Balancer, which once managed $3 billion in assets, is now considering winding down! A vote at the end of September will decide its fate, while BAL token holders' claims won't be processed until May 2027. Wow, that's basically telling the market "our project might be done," but gives holders 4 years to figure things out. Technically, BAL could face selling pressure, but given the long timeline until final execution, it might not collapse immediately. Who would hold a token knowing the project is being shut down? Short-term might see some bounce opportunities, but mid-term outlook is bearish. Token holders, be cautious.

#DeFi #Balancer
$BAL

The DeFi giant Balancer, once managing $3 billion in assets, is now considering winding down! A vote at the end of September will decide its fate, while BAL token holders' claims won't be processed until May 2027. Wow, that's basically telling the market "our project might be done," but gives holders 4 years to figure things out. Technically, BAL could face selling pressure, but given the long timeline until final execution, it might not collapse immediately. Who would hold a token knowing the project is being shut down? Short-term might see some bounce opportunities, but mid-term outlook is bearish. Token holders, be cautious.

#DeFi #Balancer
$BAL
📰 Veteran DeFi protocol Balancer is preparing to exit. In the early hours of September 15, the Treasury Council representative Marcus Hardt submitted a governance proposal suggesting the termination of day-to-day operations and R&D, with liquidation to be completed within about the next two years. 🔥 The most critical part this time is that at least $9 million worth of non-BAL assets in the DAO treasury will be distributed proportionally to holders of BAL who participate in the first round of token burns. Treasury-held BAL is not included; the distribution scope mainly covers stablecoins, liquidity assets, and low-risk yield-bearing positions, which are distributed directly based on the original assets. Honestly, this is far more about propping up the treasury’s balance-sheet figures with their own tokens than it is about supporting the protocol. veBAL will be forcibly unlocked; auraBAL and sdBAL will need to exit within a set timeframe. As for tetuBAL that cannot be redeemed, it will be compensated at 50% of the snapshot-locked amount. In the future, even if previously stolen funds are recovered, they will only go to the impacted LPs and will not be mixed into allocations for token holders. 💡 Balancer suffered a cross-chain attack last year, with losses exceeding $128 million. A white-hat team later recovered about $28 million. Since then, protocol revenue has continued to decline. As of August, monthly revenue was about $25,000, while monthly fixed costs are around $150,000. Continuing to operate would only further drain the treasury. 🤔 The liquidation is expected to last until mid-2028. Although an exit window has been left, the waiting period before the first round of distribution isn’t short either. If you hold BAL or veBAL, would you accept this arrangement—or do you still hope the protocol continues to cut costs and sustain itself? #Balancer #DeFi #DAO治理 #链上安全
📰 Veteran DeFi protocol Balancer is preparing to exit. In the early hours of September 15, the Treasury Council representative Marcus Hardt submitted a governance proposal suggesting the termination of day-to-day operations and R&D, with liquidation to be completed within about the next two years.
🔥 The most critical part this time is that at least $9 million worth of non-BAL assets in the DAO treasury will be distributed proportionally to holders of BAL who participate in the first round of token burns. Treasury-held BAL is not included; the distribution scope mainly covers stablecoins, liquidity assets, and low-risk yield-bearing positions, which are distributed directly based on the original assets.

Honestly, this is far more about propping up the treasury’s balance-sheet figures with their own tokens than it is about supporting the protocol. veBAL will be forcibly unlocked; auraBAL and sdBAL will need to exit within a set timeframe. As for tetuBAL that cannot be redeemed, it will be compensated at 50% of the snapshot-locked amount. In the future, even if previously stolen funds are recovered, they will only go to the impacted LPs and will not be mixed into allocations for token holders.
💡 Balancer suffered a cross-chain attack last year, with losses exceeding $128 million. A white-hat team later recovered about $28 million. Since then, protocol revenue has continued to decline. As of August, monthly revenue was about $25,000, while monthly fixed costs are around $150,000. Continuing to operate would only further drain the treasury.

🤔 The liquidation is expected to last until mid-2028. Although an exit window has been left, the waiting period before the first round of distribution isn’t short either. If you hold BAL or veBAL, would you accept this arrangement—or do you still hope the protocol continues to cut costs and sustain itself?
#Balancer #DeFi #DAO治理 #链上安全
One fewer familiar face among DeFi’s old guard. The Balancer team has gone on record on X, proposing an orderly shutdown of the protocol and distributing the remaining at least $9 million in the DAO treasury to BAL holders. [👉 点击链接进入群聊](https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/Cgzj78Eq) Pay attention to the wording: it’s an orderly shutdown. Not a rug pull, not a one-time emptying by hackers. It’s the founder coming forward and saying, “We’re done playing. The remaining money will be returned to token holders.” The timeline is actually pretty heartbreaking. Four months ago, Balancer had just completed a restructuring. At the time, the math looked promising—they said the treasury funds could sustain operations for about nine years. But after less than five months, it turned into a split-and-exit. What happened in between is probably clear to people in the space. After that exploit, v3’s revenue never really recovered. I’ve always felt that the hardest part of DeFi isn’t building the product—it’s figuring out how to keep it alive after it’s built. In a bull market, everyone looks respectable, propped up by inflationary rewards. But when a bear market hits, real demand reverts to what it actually is, and protocols are forced to face a very basic question: what do I make money from? This time, Balancer’s choice is relatively rare in the industry in terms of dignity. When many projects can’t make it, they either quietly stop updating or move the treasury to do something else—leaving token holders with nothing. At least Balancer has balanced the books: the remaining funds go back to LPs and holders, with the message stated plainly. But from another angle, maybe it’s simply that they didn’t keep up. The same goes for old-school AMMs—some have managed to survive a bear market just fine, which suggests the difficulty isn’t just the track itself. It’s the team’s own iteration process. Building on that, here’s one more point: from Terra to these old protocols, DeFi has been doing the same thing for years—gradually filtering out projects that don’t generate real revenue. The process is brutal, but what remains is stronger. That’s probably what people call “market clearing.” It sounds cold, but in practice it’s survival of the fittest, with the weak removed. So the question is: Is Balancer’s shutdown—returning the treasury to token holders—DeFi’s long-awaited sign of a mature, dignified exit, or is it just another project that should’ve been phased out looking for a step to stand on? Whose side are you on? #Balancer
One fewer familiar face among DeFi’s old guard. The Balancer team has gone on record on X, proposing an orderly shutdown of the protocol and distributing the remaining at least $9 million in the DAO treasury to BAL holders.
👉 点击链接进入群聊

Pay attention to the wording: it’s an orderly shutdown. Not a rug pull, not a one-time emptying by hackers. It’s the founder coming forward and saying, “We’re done playing. The remaining money will be returned to token holders.”

The timeline is actually pretty heartbreaking. Four months ago, Balancer had just completed a restructuring. At the time, the math looked promising—they said the treasury funds could sustain operations for about nine years. But after less than five months, it turned into a split-and-exit. What happened in between is probably clear to people in the space. After that exploit, v3’s revenue never really recovered.

I’ve always felt that the hardest part of DeFi isn’t building the product—it’s figuring out how to keep it alive after it’s built. In a bull market, everyone looks respectable, propped up by inflationary rewards. But when a bear market hits, real demand reverts to what it actually is, and protocols are forced to face a very basic question: what do I make money from?

This time, Balancer’s choice is relatively rare in the industry in terms of dignity. When many projects can’t make it, they either quietly stop updating or move the treasury to do something else—leaving token holders with nothing. At least Balancer has balanced the books: the remaining funds go back to LPs and holders, with the message stated plainly.

But from another angle, maybe it’s simply that they didn’t keep up. The same goes for old-school AMMs—some have managed to survive a bear market just fine, which suggests the difficulty isn’t just the track itself. It’s the team’s own iteration process.

Building on that, here’s one more point: from Terra to these old protocols, DeFi has been doing the same thing for years—gradually filtering out projects that don’t generate real revenue. The process is brutal, but what remains is stronger. That’s probably what people call “market clearing.” It sounds cold, but in practice it’s survival of the fittest, with the weak removed.

So the question is: Is Balancer’s shutdown—returning the treasury to token holders—DeFi’s long-awaited sign of a mature, dignified exit, or is it just another project that should’ve been phased out looking for a step to stand on? Whose side are you on?
#Balancer
A veteran DeFi monument of AMM is about to be “put to death”—have the $BAL holders or those still invested in the pool managed to react in time yet? Balancer Labs has just submitted a proposal to dissolve the entire protocol. Despite efforts to restructure and launch v3, revenue still couldn’t salvage the situation after the fallout from the $128 million exploit. The proposal includes a plan to allocate more than $9 million to the treasury for $BAL holders via a token burn mechanism (expected from May 2027 after the Snapshot vote on 25–29/9/2026). That said, don’t rush into FOMO buying the dip on $BAL; short-term selling pressure from people fleeing remains extremely high, since the liquidation timeline is far away. Practical take: If you’re an LP, the critical milestone is to withdraw all liquidity before 30/10/2026 before the 0-offer incentives. Personally, I think the highest priority right now is to protect your capital and avoid catching a falling knife. Have you handled your $BAL position already, or are you still standing aside and watching? Click $BAL below to keep a close eye on the fluctuations! 👇 #Balancer #DeFi #Altcoin #Crypto
A veteran DeFi monument of AMM is about to be “put to death”—have the $BAL holders or those still invested in the pool managed to react in time yet?

Balancer Labs has just submitted a proposal to dissolve the entire protocol. Despite efforts to restructure and launch v3, revenue still couldn’t salvage the situation after the fallout from the $128 million exploit.

The proposal includes a plan to allocate more than $9 million to the treasury for $BAL holders via a token burn mechanism (expected from May 2027 after the Snapshot vote on 25–29/9/2026). That said, don’t rush into FOMO buying the dip on $BAL; short-term selling pressure from people fleeing remains extremely high, since the liquidation timeline is far away.

Practical take: If you’re an LP, the critical milestone is to withdraw all liquidity before 30/10/2026 before the 0-offer incentives. Personally, I think the highest priority right now is to protect your capital and avoid catching a falling knife.

Have you handled your $BAL position already, or are you still standing aside and watching? Click $BAL below to keep a close eye on the fluctuations! 👇

#Balancer #DeFi #Altcoin #Crypto
Balancer is expected to close after failed restructuring to restore revenue • Cut costs and launch new products after restructuring, v3 does not replace the old revenue • A $128 million loss in November reduces adoption • Marcus Hardt said that v3’s failure led to considering closing down #BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Balancer #DeFi $btc $eth #vlikevn Titanbot Source: CoinTelegraph
Balancer is expected to close after failed restructuring to restore revenue

• Cut costs and launch new products after restructuring, v3 does not replace the old revenue
• A $128 million loss in November reduces adoption
• Marcus Hardt said that v3’s failure led to considering closing down
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #Balancer #DeFi

$btc $eth

#vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinTelegraph
See translation
🚨 $BAL EXPLOITER FACES ULTIMATUM AS ON-CHAIN BOUNTY DEADLINE APPROACHES ⏱️ 📌 Following the August 31st Balancer V1 exploit resulting in a $234,000 drawdown, smart money protocols are drawing strict lines in the sand. On-chain communication has been established, offering a white-hat bounty resolution before technical and legal enforcement mechanisms activate on September 9th. 🔍 💡 Institutional capital prioritizes protocol integrity above all else, making this non-negotiable window a critical structural pivot for sentiment. Order flow dynamics across security-impacted assets often signal early recoveries once capital restoration terms are finalized. 📊 💬 Do you expect the exploiter to accept the bounty, or will on-chain tracking force a legal resolution? 👇 ⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️ 🏷️ #BAL #DeFi #CryptoSecurity #Balancer 🎯 🛡️
🚨 $BAL EXPLOITER FACES ULTIMATUM AS ON-CHAIN BOUNTY DEADLINE APPROACHES ⏱️

📌 Following the August 31st Balancer V1 exploit resulting in a $234,000 drawdown, smart money protocols are drawing strict lines in the sand. On-chain communication has been established, offering a white-hat bounty resolution before technical and legal enforcement mechanisms activate on September 9th. 🔍

💡 Institutional capital prioritizes protocol integrity above all else, making this non-negotiable window a critical structural pivot for sentiment. Order flow dynamics across security-impacted assets often signal early recoveries once capital restoration terms are finalized. 📊

💬 Do you expect the exploiter to accept the bounty, or will on-chain tracking force a legal resolution? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #BAL #DeFi #CryptoSecurity #Balancer

🎯 🛡️
According to monitoring by SlowMist, the Balancer V1 liquidity pool was attacked. The attacker exploited a contract vulnerability to steal approximately $234,000 worth of assets. The root cause of the vulnerability is a precision issue in BPool’s `joinswapPoolAmountOut` function. The attacker manipulated the system to drive the WBTC reserve down to an extremely low level, then minted a large amount of BPT shares using only about 1 sat of WBTC. After that, they exited the pool proportionally and drained a variety of assets from the pool, including DPI, USDC, WETH, and WBTC. Security risks in older versions of protocols in the DeFi space should never be underestimated. Even well-known early projects may be targeted due to historical vulnerabilities. Users still need to migrate their funds to newer protocol versions as soon as possible and remain vigilant about risks. $WBTC $USDC $WETH #DeFi安全 #慢雾 #Balancer
According to monitoring by SlowMist, the Balancer V1 liquidity pool was attacked. The attacker exploited a contract vulnerability to steal approximately $234,000 worth of assets.

The root cause of the vulnerability is a precision issue in BPool’s `joinswapPoolAmountOut` function. The attacker manipulated the system to drive the WBTC reserve down to an extremely low level, then minted a large amount of BPT shares using only about 1 sat of WBTC. After that, they exited the pool proportionally and drained a variety of assets from the pool, including DPI, USDC, WETH, and WBTC.

Security risks in older versions of protocols in the DeFi space should never be underestimated. Even well-known early projects may be targeted due to historical vulnerabilities. Users still need to migrate their funds to newer protocol versions as soon as possible and remain vigilant about risks.

$WBTC $USDC $WETH
#DeFi安全 #慢雾 #Balancer
·
--
Bullish
See translation
💎 $BAL is attracting fresh interest. 📈 Higher lows suggest accumulation. ⚡ Watch for a bullish breakout. #bal #balancer #crypto
💎 $BAL is attracting fresh interest. 📈 Higher lows suggest accumulation. ⚡ Watch for a bullish breakout.
#bal #balancer #crypto
See translation
$1INCH optimizes decentralized exchange routing. #1Inchusdt $YFI remains a notable DeFi governance asset. #yearnfinance $BAL powers decentralized portfolio management. #Balancer
$1INCH optimizes decentralized exchange routing. #1Inchusdt
$YFI remains a notable DeFi governance asset. #yearnfinance
$BAL powers decentralized portfolio management. #Balancer
See translation
🦈 $BAL TREASURY DISTRIBUTION PROPOSAL SETS UP A LIQUIDITY EVENT 📊 Balancer's forum proposal to wind down its treasury and distribute remaining $BAL to holders reframes the asset as a potential liquidity event, not just a governance token. 📊 If the vote advances, expect a tug-of-war between immediate sell pressure and smart-money positioning ahead of any snapshot. 💡 The key is structure: a reclaim of prior demand could turn distribution into accumulation, while a failure would expose the market to another sweep. 🌊 Are you fading the headline or waiting for a confirmed structural flip? 👇 ⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️ 🏷️ #BAL #Balancer #LiquidityEvent #Tokenomics #Crypto 🎯 🦈
🦈 $BAL TREASURY DISTRIBUTION PROPOSAL SETS UP A LIQUIDITY EVENT 📊

Balancer's forum proposal to wind down its treasury and distribute remaining $BAL to holders reframes the asset as a potential liquidity event, not just a governance token. 📊 If the vote advances, expect a tug-of-war between immediate sell pressure and smart-money positioning ahead of any snapshot. 💡 The key is structure: a reclaim of prior demand could turn distribution into accumulation, while a failure would expose the market to another sweep. 🌊 Are you fading the headline or waiting for a confirmed structural flip? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #BAL #Balancer #LiquidityEvent #Tokenomics #Crypto

🎯 🦈
See translation
🚨 $BAL TREASURY DISSOLUTION PROPOSAL SETS UP FINAL HOLDER PAYOUT 💥 Balancer just floated a dissolution proposal that would funnel the remaining $BAL treasury straight to holders. 🦈 This flips the usual slow bleed into a final liquidity event, and the scramble for the last payout is now the trade. 📊 The edge is not just sentiment — it is the mechanical squeeze as buyers front-run a potential distribution window. ⚡ If the proposal advances, the next move may be less about fundamentals and more about who catches the last treasury wave before the exit door swings shut. 💬 Are you positioning for the final holder distribution or waiting for the proposal to clear first? ⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️ 🏷️ #BAL #Balancer #Distribution #HolderRewards #Crypto 🔥 🎯
🚨 $BAL TREASURY DISSOLUTION PROPOSAL SETS UP FINAL HOLDER PAYOUT 💥

Balancer just floated a dissolution proposal that would funnel the remaining $BAL treasury straight to holders. 🦈 This flips the usual slow bleed into a final liquidity event, and the scramble for the last payout is now the trade. 📊

The edge is not just sentiment — it is the mechanical squeeze as buyers front-run a potential distribution window. ⚡ If the proposal advances, the next move may be less about fundamentals and more about who catches the last treasury wave before the exit door swings shut.

💬 Are you positioning for the final holder distribution or waiting for the proposal to clear first?

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #BAL #Balancer #Distribution #HolderRewards #Crypto

🔥 🎯
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number