BULL SPARK
2.9k 投稿
BULL SPARK
取引を発注
BANKホルダー
高頻度トレーダー
1.8年
439 フォロー
19.0K+ フォロワー
1.6K+ いいね
投稿
ポートフォリオ
すべて
引用
ライブ
翻訳参照
People often notice a shop when the crowd arrives, not when the doors first open.
Crypto works the same way. Dusk is building around regulated onchain finance, confidential transactions and the XSC standard, while DUSK remains the gas and staking asset. The interesting part is the asymmetry: with roughly $29M market cap and about $2M daily volume recently, relatively little liquidity can still move the narrative quickly.
If privacy for regulated assets becomes a serious market theme, DUSK has a structure worth watching. But narratives rotate faster than liquidity arrives.
That gap is where the real question begins.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Crypto works the same way. Dusk is building around regulated onchain finance, confidential transactions and the XSC standard, while DUSK remains the gas and staking asset. The interesting part is the asymmetry: with roughly $29M market cap and about $2M daily volume recently, relatively little liquidity can still move the narrative quickly.
If privacy for regulated assets becomes a serious market theme, DUSK has a structure worth watching. But narratives rotate faster than liquidity arrives.
That gap is where the real question begins.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
翻訳参照
Been watching TermMax quietly for a while now, and honestly the Royco Senior Tranche collateral update caught my attention more than I expected it to.
The idea is simple you hold structured yield assets like stcUSD or syrupUSDC, and instead of selling them to access liquidity, you borrow against them at a fixed rate. No variable rate surprises mid-position. That's the part I keep coming back to.
Most protocols I've used treat rate volatility like a feature. TermMax treats it like the actual problem. And after getting wrecked by a rate spike on another platform last cycle, that shift in philosophy genuinely matters to me.
What makes this more than just another collateral integration is the bigger picture they're essentially building infrastructure that connects yield-bearing assets, borrowers, and structured strategies in one coherent layer. That's not easy to do cleanly, and most protocols don't even try.
I think this kind of fixed-rate primitive is exactly what on-chain capital allocation has been missing whether it's DAOs managing treasuries or AI-driven systems that need predictable cost inputs to function properly.
Still early, still watching. But it's one of the few DeFi products where I've genuinely changed how I think about positioning.
Curious do you think fixed-rate DeFi ever becomes the default, or will variable rates always dominate liquidity.
#termmax @TermMax
The idea is simple you hold structured yield assets like stcUSD or syrupUSDC, and instead of selling them to access liquidity, you borrow against them at a fixed rate. No variable rate surprises mid-position. That's the part I keep coming back to.
Most protocols I've used treat rate volatility like a feature. TermMax treats it like the actual problem. And after getting wrecked by a rate spike on another platform last cycle, that shift in philosophy genuinely matters to me.
What makes this more than just another collateral integration is the bigger picture they're essentially building infrastructure that connects yield-bearing assets, borrowers, and structured strategies in one coherent layer. That's not easy to do cleanly, and most protocols don't even try.
I think this kind of fixed-rate primitive is exactly what on-chain capital allocation has been missing whether it's DAOs managing treasuries or AI-driven systems that need predictable cost inputs to function properly.
Still early, still watching. But it's one of the few DeFi products where I've genuinely changed how I think about positioning.
Curious do you think fixed-rate DeFi ever becomes the default, or will variable rates always dominate liquidity.
#termmax @TermMax
翻訳参照
Dusk: Privacy Is Only Half the Product
Dusk is interesting for a less obvious reason: it is trying to make confidentiality usable inside regulated finance, rather than treating privacy as an isolated feature.
Its XSC standard and confidential smart contracts create a model where sensitive financial logic can remain private while still operating on a public L1. The harder question is whether developers, institutions, and users actually need that trade-off enough to create sustained network demand.
Recent ecosystem development matters because every integration is a test of that thesis. If applications can use Dusk for compliant, confidential settlement and tokenized assets, the network starts looking less like a privacy experiment and more like financial infrastructure.
The contrarian point: privacy alone probably won't drive DUSK demand. Usage will matter only if applications turn network activity into recurring fees, staking demand, and economic incentives.
Think of Dusk like a bank vault with programmable doors: the value isn't that the vault exists—it is whether enough valuable transactions need to pass through it.
For DUSK, I’d watch three things next:
- Real network activity and transaction growth
- Staking and circulating-supply dynamics
- Whether new financial applications generate recurring usage
The thesis is simple: Dusk doesn't need to win the privacy narrative; it needs to prove that confidential financial infrastructure creates measurable economic demand.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Dusk is interesting for a less obvious reason: it is trying to make confidentiality usable inside regulated finance, rather than treating privacy as an isolated feature.
Its XSC standard and confidential smart contracts create a model where sensitive financial logic can remain private while still operating on a public L1. The harder question is whether developers, institutions, and users actually need that trade-off enough to create sustained network demand.
Recent ecosystem development matters because every integration is a test of that thesis. If applications can use Dusk for compliant, confidential settlement and tokenized assets, the network starts looking less like a privacy experiment and more like financial infrastructure.
The contrarian point: privacy alone probably won't drive DUSK demand. Usage will matter only if applications turn network activity into recurring fees, staking demand, and economic incentives.
Think of Dusk like a bank vault with programmable doors: the value isn't that the vault exists—it is whether enough valuable transactions need to pass through it.
For DUSK, I’d watch three things next:
- Real network activity and transaction growth
- Staking and circulating-supply dynamics
- Whether new financial applications generate recurring usage
The thesis is simple: Dusk doesn't need to win the privacy narrative; it needs to prove that confidential financial infrastructure creates measurable economic demand.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
翻訳参照
5 years of pain.
Zero gains.
Crypto holders didn’t lose faith.
They lost time.
And somehow… we’re still here.
Zero gains.
Crypto holders didn’t lose faith.
They lost time.
And somehow… we’re still here.
翻訳参照
I keep coming back to Dusk for one reason: it doesn’t treat privacy as a side feature.
Most chains make everything visible first, then try to build privacy around the edges.
Dusk starts from the uncomfortable reality of financial markets: balances, positions, counterparties and transaction details simply can’t be public by default.
That’s where the XSC standard gets interesting.
It’s designed for confidential smart contracts and tokenized securities, while still allowing rules like eligibility, transfer restrictions, compliance and selective disclosure to exist on-chain.
The quiet detail I think gets missed is that Dusk isn’t aiming for “private crypto.”
It is trying to make a public settlement layer usable for markets that actually need privacy.
Underneath that, Dusk now combines transparent accounts through Moonlight, shielded transfers through Phoenix, ZK capabilities, deterministic settlement and both native DuskVM and EVM execution paths.
And the token isn’t just sitting there as a ticker.
$DUSK is used for gas and staking, tying network activity and security back to the native asset. The current token model has a 1B maximum supply.
That makes the thesis less about “privacy coin” and more about whether regulated financial activity eventually needs a blockchain where confidentiality and auditability can coexist.
That’s a much harder problem.
And probably the more interesting one to watch.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
Most chains make everything visible first, then try to build privacy around the edges.
Dusk starts from the uncomfortable reality of financial markets: balances, positions, counterparties and transaction details simply can’t be public by default.
That’s where the XSC standard gets interesting.
It’s designed for confidential smart contracts and tokenized securities, while still allowing rules like eligibility, transfer restrictions, compliance and selective disclosure to exist on-chain.
The quiet detail I think gets missed is that Dusk isn’t aiming for “private crypto.”
It is trying to make a public settlement layer usable for markets that actually need privacy.
Underneath that, Dusk now combines transparent accounts through Moonlight, shielded transfers through Phoenix, ZK capabilities, deterministic settlement and both native DuskVM and EVM execution paths.
And the token isn’t just sitting there as a ticker.
$DUSK is used for gas and staking, tying network activity and security back to the native asset. The current token model has a 1B maximum supply.
That makes the thesis less about “privacy coin” and more about whether regulated financial activity eventually needs a blockchain where confidentiality and auditability can coexist.
That’s a much harder problem.
And probably the more interesting one to watch.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
翻訳参照
Most people notice a shop only when the crowd arrives. Markets work the same way: attention usually comes after liquidity, not before it.
Dusk is interesting because the thesis is bigger than “privacy.” Its L1 is built around regulated finance, confidential smart contracts and selective disclosure, while DUSK itself is used for gas and staking.
But the market is still pricing it like a small-cap trade. Recent data puts DUSK around a $30M–$36M market cap, with roughly $2M–$3M daily volume depending on the source and snapshot. That means relatively modest liquidity can amplify both attention and selling pressure.
The supply mechanics matter too: Dusk’s model allows up to 1B DUSK, with 500M additional tokens emitted over time to fund staking rewards.
If regulated on-chain finance becomes the next narrative rotation and liquidity actually follows the story, DUSK has an interesting setup. If attention fades, the small market cap cuts both ways.
The technology can create the narrative. Liquidity decides whether the market believes it.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
Dusk is interesting because the thesis is bigger than “privacy.” Its L1 is built around regulated finance, confidential smart contracts and selective disclosure, while DUSK itself is used for gas and staking.
But the market is still pricing it like a small-cap trade. Recent data puts DUSK around a $30M–$36M market cap, with roughly $2M–$3M daily volume depending on the source and snapshot. That means relatively modest liquidity can amplify both attention and selling pressure.
The supply mechanics matter too: Dusk’s model allows up to 1B DUSK, with 500M additional tokens emitted over time to fund staking rewards.
If regulated on-chain finance becomes the next narrative rotation and liquidity actually follows the story, DUSK has an interesting setup. If attention fades, the small market cap cuts both ways.
The technology can create the narrative. Liquidity decides whether the market believes it.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
翻訳参照
DUSK is one of those projects that looks boring until you ask the right question:
What happens when financial data simply cannot be public?
I’ve been watching Dusk from that angle.
Most blockchains treat transparency as the default. Fine for crypto-native trading. Much harder when the data involves balances, counterparties, positions, investor eligibility or sensitive business logic.
Dusk takes a different route.
Its XSC standard is built for confidential smart contracts and tokenized securities, while the network combines shielded transfers, selective disclosure and zero-knowledge capabilities. The interesting part is that privacy doesn’t mean “nobody can verify anything.” It means the right information can be proven or disclosed without exposing everything else.
That distinction matters.
Dusk also has a native L1 token, DUSK. It pays gas and is used for staking; the current protocol has a 1,000 DUSK minimum stake. The supply model is designed around 500M initial supply plus up to another 500M emitted over time, with emissions declining over a 36-year schedule.
And this is where I think people often miss the point.
Dusk isn’t really trying to make finance “anonymous.”
It is trying to make financial activity programmable without forcing every sensitive detail onto a public billboard.
That’s a much narrower idea.
And probably a much more useful one.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
What happens when financial data simply cannot be public?
I’ve been watching Dusk from that angle.
Most blockchains treat transparency as the default. Fine for crypto-native trading. Much harder when the data involves balances, counterparties, positions, investor eligibility or sensitive business logic.
Dusk takes a different route.
Its XSC standard is built for confidential smart contracts and tokenized securities, while the network combines shielded transfers, selective disclosure and zero-knowledge capabilities. The interesting part is that privacy doesn’t mean “nobody can verify anything.” It means the right information can be proven or disclosed without exposing everything else.
That distinction matters.
Dusk also has a native L1 token, DUSK. It pays gas and is used for staking; the current protocol has a 1,000 DUSK minimum stake. The supply model is designed around 500M initial supply plus up to another 500M emitted over time, with emissions declining over a 36-year schedule.
And this is where I think people often miss the point.
Dusk isn’t really trying to make finance “anonymous.”
It is trying to make financial activity programmable without forcing every sensitive detail onto a public billboard.
That’s a much narrower idea.
And probably a much more useful one.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
翻訳参照
A friend who works in compliance asked me last week why anyone would put securities on a blockchain that lets strangers see every trade. I didn't have a great answer at the time, so I went and actually looked into how Dusk's XSC standard tries to solve that.
The idea itself isn't complicated. Most tokenized securities right now, think tokenized treasuries or bond products, are transparent by default and rely on a permissioned wallet list to control who can hold them. The compliance sits on top, bolted onto an otherwise open ledger. XSC flips that, the privacy is part of the contract itself, so ownership and trade details stay hidden, but the system can still generate a proof that the rules were followed if a regulator asks.
After losing money on a lending platform blowup a while back, I'm naturally wary of anything that asks me to trust a black box, and XSC's proof system is very much a black box to a normal user. That's my honest concern, zero-knowledge heavy systems are hard to audit, and if something breaks inside the proof logic it's not the kind of bug you'd catch by eyeballing a contract.
The upside is real though, institutions get privacy without giving up custody or relying on a transfer agent to settle trades.
Would you actually trust a system you can't fully see into, even if it can mathematically prove it's fair?
Create Create a visually rich infographic about that explains this in an image and that should be a cinematic infographic type image
focal point, supported by diagrams, callouts, and concise text elements.
with strong graphic elements (shapes, icons, color blocking) in a layered composition.
size 2:3ratio
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
The idea itself isn't complicated. Most tokenized securities right now, think tokenized treasuries or bond products, are transparent by default and rely on a permissioned wallet list to control who can hold them. The compliance sits on top, bolted onto an otherwise open ledger. XSC flips that, the privacy is part of the contract itself, so ownership and trade details stay hidden, but the system can still generate a proof that the rules were followed if a regulator asks.
After losing money on a lending platform blowup a while back, I'm naturally wary of anything that asks me to trust a black box, and XSC's proof system is very much a black box to a normal user. That's my honest concern, zero-knowledge heavy systems are hard to audit, and if something breaks inside the proof logic it's not the kind of bug you'd catch by eyeballing a contract.
The upside is real though, institutions get privacy without giving up custody or relying on a transfer agent to settle trades.
Would you actually trust a system you can't fully see into, even if it can mathematically prove it's fair?
Create Create a visually rich infographic about that explains this in an image and that should be a cinematic infographic type image
focal point, supported by diagrams, callouts, and concise text elements.
with strong graphic elements (shapes, icons, color blocking) in a layered composition.
size 2:3ratio
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
翻訳参照
Crypto is officially the worst-performing major asset class since January 2025.
Silver: +107%
Copper: +66%
Gold: +60%
Nasdaq: +38%
Russell 2000: +31%
Meanwhile:
Bitcoin: -35%
ETH: -47%
Altcoins: -57%
That gap is brutal.
But it also creates the biggest question in the market: is crypto broken, or simply being priced for a recovery nobody believes in yet?
The most hated asset class could become the most interesting trade if sentiment turns.
Silver: +107%
Copper: +66%
Gold: +60%
Nasdaq: +38%
Russell 2000: +31%
Meanwhile:
Bitcoin: -35%
ETH: -47%
Altcoins: -57%
That gap is brutal.
But it also creates the biggest question in the market: is crypto broken, or simply being priced for a recovery nobody believes in yet?
The most hated asset class could become the most interesting trade if sentiment turns.
多くのトレーダーは値動きを見ますが、より良い指標は流動性が新たな供給とぶつかったときに何が起きるかです。
バビロンが興味深いのは、プロダクトがビットコイン保有者が歴史的に避けてきたことを実行している点です。つまり、ラップやブリッジをせずに、ネイティブBTCを担保として使うことです。とはいえ、BABYトークンには別の流動性プロファイルがあります。時価総額がおおよそ4,700万ドル、24時間取引高が約670万ドルで、さらに予定されているアンロック（解除）は2029年まで続くため、物語（ナラティブ）の進みは、実際の流通量よりも速くなり得ます。
論点はシンプルです。もしBTCステーキングの採用が引き続き伸び、BABYがステーキング、ガバナンス、ネットワークセキュリティを通じて実際のユーティリティを獲得するなら、最終的に流動性が物語に追いつく可能性があります。逆に、それが起きる前に注目が別へ移るなら、物語よりもアンロックのスケジュールのほうが重要になります。
私はここを見ます。バビロンが重要そうに聞こえるかどうかではなく、注目が他へ移ったときに需要が供給を吸収できるかどうかです。
@BabylonLabs_io #baby $BABY
バビロンが興味深いのは、プロダクトがビットコイン保有者が歴史的に避けてきたことを実行している点です。つまり、ラップやブリッジをせずに、ネイティブBTCを担保として使うことです。とはいえ、BABYトークンには別の流動性プロファイルがあります。時価総額がおおよそ4,700万ドル、24時間取引高が約670万ドルで、さらに予定されているアンロック（解除）は2029年まで続くため、物語（ナラティブ）の進みは、実際の流通量よりも速くなり得ます。
論点はシンプルです。もしBTCステーキングの採用が引き続き伸び、BABYがステーキング、ガバナンス、ネットワークセキュリティを通じて実際のユーティリティを獲得するなら、最終的に流動性が物語に追いつく可能性があります。逆に、それが起きる前に注目が別へ移るなら、物語よりもアンロックのスケジュールのほうが重要になります。
私はここを見ます。バビロンが重要そうに聞こえるかどうかではなく、注目が他へ移ったときに需要が供給を吸収できるかどうかです。
@BabylonLabs_io #baby $BABY
ほとんどの市場は、プロジェクトが良くなったからといって動きません。動くのは、流動性がようやくそれに気づいたときです。
それが、バビロン（Babylon／$BABY ）を見守る上で面白い理由です。中核となる発想はシンプルで、ビットコイン本体をラップしたりブリッジしたりすることなく、ネイティブBTCがPoSネットワークのセキュリティ確保に役立つようにする、というものです。ただしトークンは話が別です。BABYは現在、時価総額がおよそ4,700万ドル、24時間の出来高が約670万ドルあたりに位置している一方で、トークン供給はまだ増加中です。次に予定されているアンロック（解放）は8月10日のさらに1億3600万BABYで、新たな供給が加わる可能性があるにもかかわらず、流動性がまだ比較的薄い市場です。
したがって、論点は単に「ビットコインのステーキングが大きい」ということではありません。バビロンが、実際のBTCセキュリティ需要を、トークンの新規供給が市場に届くスピードよりも速く、BABYへの継続的な需要へ転換できるかどうかです。
採用が伸び、流動性が深まっていけば、市場は最終的に注目ではなくユーティリティに基づいてトークン価格を再評価するかもしれません。それまでは、アンロックのスケジュールは、物語性（ナラティブ）とほぼ同じくらい重要になります。
@BabylonLabs_io #baby $BABY
それが、バビロン（Babylon／$BABY ）を見守る上で面白い理由です。中核となる発想はシンプルで、ビットコイン本体をラップしたりブリッジしたりすることなく、ネイティブBTCがPoSネットワークのセキュリティ確保に役立つようにする、というものです。ただしトークンは話が別です。BABYは現在、時価総額がおよそ4,700万ドル、24時間の出来高が約670万ドルあたりに位置している一方で、トークン供給はまだ増加中です。次に予定されているアンロック（解放）は8月10日のさらに1億3600万BABYで、新たな供給が加わる可能性があるにもかかわらず、流動性がまだ比較的薄い市場です。
したがって、論点は単に「ビットコインのステーキングが大きい」ということではありません。バビロンが、実際のBTCセキュリティ需要を、トークンの新規供給が市場に届くスピードよりも速く、BABYへの継続的な需要へ転換できるかどうかです。
採用が伸び、流動性が深まっていけば、市場は最終的に注目ではなくユーティリティに基づいてトークン価格を再評価するかもしれません。それまでは、アンロックのスケジュールは、物語性（ナラティブ）とほぼ同じくらい重要になります。
@BabylonLabs_io #baby $BABY
🥚 緊急速報: 卵が暗号資産を“赤っ恥”にした。🤯
📉 8年前に $XRP に投資した $10,000 は、今日では約 $3,000 になっている。
📈 卵にたった1か月前に $10,000 使ったら？ 伝えられるところでは $43,400 の価値。
現実は、ときに市場よりも奇妙だ。
これは $XRP だけの話ではない。インフレ、供給ショック、そして市場サイクルが、誰も想像しない場所でも信じられない勝者を生み出しうるという教訓だ。
2026年へようこそ。🚀🥚
📉 8年前に $XRP に投資した $10,000 は、今日では約 $3,000 になっている。
📈 卵にたった1か月前に $10,000 使ったら？ 伝えられるところでは $43,400 の価値。
現実は、ときに市場よりも奇妙だ。
これは $XRP だけの話ではない。インフレ、供給ショック、そして市場サイクルが、誰も想像しない場所でも信じられない勝者を生み出しうるという教訓だ。
2026年へようこそ。🚀🥚
🚨 2012年からのビットコインの法定通貨建て価格 📈
ビットコインは10年以上、ひとつのことを証明してきました。つまり、法定通貨は購買力を失う一方で、希少な資産は上がり続けられるということです。
数ペンスからBTCあたり数万ドルまで… 通貨供給が膨らみ続けると何が起きるのか、そのチャートは容赦ない現実を突きつけています。
₿ ビットコインが高くなっているわけではありません。法定通貨の価値が弱っているのです。
ビットコインは10年以上、ひとつのことを証明してきました。つまり、法定通貨は購買力を失う一方で、希少な資産は上がり続けられるということです。
数ペンスからBTCあたり数万ドルまで… 通貨供給が膨らみ続けると何が起きるのか、そのチャートは容赦ない現実を突きつけています。
₿ ビットコインが高くなっているわけではありません。法定通貨の価値が弱っているのです。
🚨 緊急速報：🇺🇸 ダブ・マコーミック上院議員は、上院が迅速に動き、CLARITY法案を採決のために本会議へ上程しなければならないと言っています。
⏳ 残り2週間です。
「とにかく急がないと。」
時計の針は進んでいます。仮想通貨の規制が、ワシントンで重要な局面に入ろうとしている可能性があります。🇺🇸🔥
⏳ 残り2週間です。
「とにかく急がないと。」
時計の針は進んでいます。仮想通貨の規制が、ワシントンで重要な局面に入ろうとしている可能性があります。🇺🇸🔥
🚨 緊急速報：新たな研究が残酷な現実を浮き彫りにしました――1971年に最低賃金で働く人の購買力は、今日およそ10万ドルを稼ぐ人に匹敵していたのです。
米ドルはその後、購買力をおよそ87%失っています。
💸 現金はただ置いてあるだけではありません。時間とともに価値が目減りします。
投資しなければ、お金は静かに腐っていきます。購買力を守りましょう。🔥📈
米ドルはその後、購買力をおよそ87%失っています。
💸 現金はただ置いてあるだけではありません。時間とともに価値が目減りします。
投資しなければ、お金は静かに腐っていきます。購買力を守りましょう。🔥📈
🚨 絶対に正気じゃない！
イーロン・マスクの純資産は、6月16日以降に7,290億ドル（729 BILLION）も急落したと報じられています。
これは、ビットコインの時価総額全体のおよそ57%に相当します。🤯
この数字の規模を想像してみてください…
7,290億ドル（729 BILLION）。
トップにいる人たちの資産の増減が、めちゃくちゃヤバい方向に向かってます。🚀🔥
イーロン・マスクの純資産は、6月16日以降に7,290億ドル（729 BILLION）も急落したと報じられています。
これは、ビットコインの時価総額全体のおよそ57%に相当します。🤯
この数字の規模を想像してみてください…
7,290億ドル（729 BILLION）。
トップにいる人たちの資産の増減が、めちゃくちゃヤバい方向に向かってます。🚀🔥
🚨速報：これは暗号にとって極めて大きなニュース 🇺🇸🔥
7兆ドル規模の資産運用会社フィデリティが、米上院に対して「明確性法（CLARITY Act）」の可決を強く求めています。
メッセージは明確です。米国には、規制上の確実性、より強い投資家の信頼、そしてデジタル資産に関する明確なルールが必要です。
ウォール街が後押ししています。暗号業界も後押ししています。圧力が高まっています。
🇺🇸 米国の暗号規制の新たな時代が、次の章に入ろうとしている可能性があります。
あとは上院です。
明確性法（CLARITY Act）を可決せよ。 🚀🔥
#Crypto #Bitcoin #CLARITYAct
7兆ドル規模の資産運用会社フィデリティが、米上院に対して「明確性法（CLARITY Act）」の可決を強く求めています。
メッセージは明確です。米国には、規制上の確実性、より強い投資家の信頼、そしてデジタル資産に関する明確なルールが必要です。
ウォール街が後押ししています。暗号業界も後押ししています。圧力が高まっています。
🇺🇸 米国の暗号規制の新たな時代が、次の章に入ろうとしている可能性があります。
あとは上院です。
明確性法（CLARITY Act）を可決せよ。 🚀🔥
#Crypto #Bitcoin #CLARITYAct
🚨 これは暗号資産にとって超重要！ 🚨
7兆ドル規模の巨大なフィデリティが、米上院に「Clarity Act（明確化法）」の可決を求めています。🇺🇸
ウォール街が声を大きくしてきました――そしてメッセージは明確です：
👉 暗号資産には規制の明確さが必要。
👉 米国には明確なルールが必要。
👉 業界は今すぐ行動を求めています。
もし「Clarity Act」が前進すれば、機関投資家による暗号資産採用の次の波を解き放つ、大きな一歩になるかもしれません。🚀🔥
大口マネーは注目しています。👀
ルールが書かれているところです。
暗号資産の規制が、これまで以上に面白くなりました。⚡️
7兆ドル規模の巨大なフィデリティが、米上院に「Clarity Act（明確化法）」の可決を求めています。🇺🇸
ウォール街が声を大きくしてきました――そしてメッセージは明確です：
👉 暗号資産には規制の明確さが必要。
👉 米国には明確なルールが必要。
👉 業界は今すぐ行動を求めています。
もし「Clarity Act」が前進すれば、機関投資家による暗号資産採用の次の波を解き放つ、大きな一歩になるかもしれません。🚀🔥
大口マネーは注目しています。👀
ルールが書かれているところです。
暗号資産の規制が、これまで以上に面白くなりました。⚡️
🚨緊急速報：🇺🇸 上院議員シンシア・ラミスは、トランプ大統領が倫理規定に自発的に合意したと述べた――CLARITY法案への最大の障害を取り除くことになる。
🔥 彼女のメッセージ：「今すぐCLARITY法案を可決せよ！」
米国における暗号資産の規制は、かつてないほど近づいているかもしれない。🚀🇺🇸
🔥 彼女のメッセージ：「今すぐCLARITY法案を可決せよ！」
米国における暗号資産の規制は、かつてないほど近づいているかもしれない。🚀🇺🇸
ログインして、さらにコンテンツを読む