Crypto Breaking

A bipartisan U.S. housing bill that includes a ban on central bank digital currency (CBDC) issuance is poised to become law without President Donald Trump’s signature, as the allowable window for action runs out.
According to the timeline described in the article, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act was on Trump’s desk for 10 days (excluding Sundays) as of early Friday, which is the maximum time the president can let a bill sit without either vetoing it or signing it. The U.S. Constitution provides that a bill becomes law automatically if the president does not take action within that period. Trump previously canceled a signing ceremony for the bill on June 24, and on Friday he reiterated that he would not sign it.
Key takeaways
The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act is set to become law automatically if the president does not veto it within the constitutional timeframe.
Inside the housing package, lawmakers included language barring the Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a CBDC—or a substantially similar digital asset—until Dec. 31, 2030.
Trump said on Friday he would not sign the bill, but he did not specifically address the CBDC ban in that post.
The episode renews questions about how Trump’s approach to unrelated legislation could spill over into major digital-asset bills under debate in the Senate.
Trump declines to sign, but the bill still moves forward
In a Friday social media post, Trump confirmed that he would not sign the housing bill. He criticized the Republicans in Congress who supported the legislation, calling their actions “dumb,” and urged the Senate to focus instead on another measure, the SAVE America Act.
That voting bill would require individuals to provide proof of U.S. citizenship in person to register. The article notes that it has faced widespread criticism, including claims that it could disenfranchise citizens who are already eligible to vote.
Even with Trump’s stated intention not to sign, the legal mechanism tied to the presidential desk time matters for investors and policy watchers: if Trump does not veto the bill by the end of the constitutional window, it will become law without a signature. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who co-sponsored the bill, pointed to this dynamic, saying the “good news” is that it would become law anyway.
What the housing bill changes for CBDC policy
The housing act’s digital-asset language is the portion most closely watched by the crypto community. The measure includes restrictions that prevent the Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a CBDC—or any digital asset considered “substantially similar”—until Dec. 31, 2030.
The article says many analysts viewed the CBDC ban as a political concession designed to help build support across parties. Importantly, Trump’s Friday post criticizing the housing bill did not mention the CBDC provision, leaving unanswered how directly the administration aligns with the restriction in practice—at least for now.
For developers and market participants, a multi-year prohibition aimed at a central bank-issued token model can affect expectations about the direction of U.S. financial infrastructure. While it does not replace broader digital-asset legislation, it narrows the range of actions available to the Federal Reserve during the window specified by the law.
Could the same hesitation affect the Senate’s crypto agenda?
Beyond the housing vote, the article raises a broader policy question: whether Trump’s unwillingness to sign legislation—when it clashes with his preferences—could create similar uncertainty for major digital-asset bills in the Senate.
In May, Trump said he wanted to “future-proof” digital asset regulations. Yet his decision not to sign the housing bill, which is not directly a crypto bill, has led to speculation about the treatment of other proposals moving through Congress.
One centerpiece mentioned is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. The article states that many observers consider it among the most significant efforts to shape digital-asset regulation. It also reports that the bill has already passed the House and cleared two crucial Senate committees.
According to the article, Republican leaders expect CLARITY to head to the full Senate for a floor vote in July, once lawmakers return from state work periods on Monday. That schedule would place the bill in a politically sensitive window—especially if Trump’s approach to signing legislation remains skeptical or conditional.
The article also highlights that Trump’s relationship with the crypto industry has already complicated negotiations between Democrats and Republicans over market-structure rules. It points to disclosures that Trump earned more than $1.4 billion in income from his crypto ventures in 2025, including memecoins and the family’s World Liberty Financial platform.
While those details don’t prove how any specific bill would be treated, they underscore why digital-asset policy is closely tied to political optics as well as regulatory substance.
Why this matters to crypto stakeholders now
The CBDC restriction embedded in a housing law is a reminder that digital-asset policy can advance through unexpected legislative channels, not only dedicated crypto bills. Even if the broader U.S. regulatory framework for tokens and exchanges remains under development, targeted provisions can still shape expectations about central bank involvement and the future design of dollar-linked digital products.
At the same time, the question raised by this episode—whether major legislation could face presidential resistance—has immediate relevance for CLARITY and other crypto-focused proposals expected to reach the Senate floor. Crypto market participants typically watch the path to a floor vote and the likelihood of final passage; presidential sign-or-veto dynamics add another layer of uncertainty even when the legislative calendar looks favorable.
In the near term, readers should watch two things: whether Trump attempts a veto on the housing bill (which would prevent the CBDC ban from taking effect), and how the Senate proceeds with the CLARITY Act as lawmakers prepare for a July floor vote. The gap between congressional momentum and presidential willingness—highlighted by this housing case—may be the key variable for crypto policy over the next legislative cycle.
This article was originally published as US CBDC ban takes effect as housing bill stalls without Trump approval on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

EU regulators are moving beyond the “license first” phase of crypto oversight and turning their attention to whether custodians can actually operate safely under stress. On Wednesday, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) launched a Common Supervisory Action (CSA) focused on the operational resilience of crypto asset service providers (CASPs), with custody services at the center of the review.
The initiative arrives soon after MiCA’s transitional period ended, marking one of the first large supervisory exercises under the EU’s new crypto rulebook. ESMA says it will examine a sample of MiCA-authorized CASPs and evaluate how mature their digital operational resilience frameworks are for custody-related activities.
Key takeaways
ESMA’s Common Supervisory Action targets operational resilience for custody services, shifting scrutiny from authorization to day-to-day risk controls.
The review will examine areas such as key and storage management, transaction controls, incident response, and reliance on third parties.
Industry executives say institutional clients are already pressing custodians for detailed evidence around segregation, access controls, and business continuity.
Legal experts note the assessment intersects with both MiCA custody obligations and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) technology risk framework.
ESMA’s findings could influence broader EU debates about how CASPs should be supervised, including potential centralization at EU level.
ESMA’s supervisory action shifts the focus to operational proof
ESMA’s CSA will apply to a selected set of authorized CASPs under MiCA. Rather than treating licensing as a compliance endpoint, ESMA’s stated goal is to assess the maturity of firms’ operational resilience frameworks specifically for custody activities.
According to ESMA, the evaluation will cover multiple risk domains: key and storage management practices, transaction control mechanisms, how firms respond to incidents, and how they manage dependencies on third-party providers. This is important because custody failures are not only a legal breach—they can quickly translate into direct operational disruption and, potentially, loss of control over customer assets.
Speaking to Cointelegraph, Sebastien Dessimoz, co-founder and managing partner at digital asset infrastructure firm Taurus, characterized the message as clear: “for custodians, a licence is the start line, not the finish.” He argued the move is constructive, reflecting how digital assets are integrating deeper into regulated financial infrastructure and therefore should meet the same resilience and accountability expectations as in traditional markets.
That emphasis on evidence is also resonating with institutions. Jody Mettler, chief operating officer of BitGo and president of BitGo Trust, told Cointelegraph that institutional clients are already asking more granular questions about custody operations—particularly how segregated assets are handled, how access controls work, what happens during incidents, and whether business continuity plans remain effective when markets are under pressure.
Two operational tests: MiCA authorization and resilience under real-world conditions
For market participants, the ESMA move underscores that MiCA authorization and operational resilience are not interchangeable. Markus Levin, co-founder of blockchain infrastructure company XYO, framed it as “two different tests,” adding that custodians capable of demonstrating robust controls before ESMA completes its review could be positioned to benefit as institutional adoption grows.
That distinction matters because it changes what “good compliance” looks like in practice. Licensing under MiCA may indicate that a firm has met baseline regulatory requirements, but operational resilience assessments require ongoing demonstration: how controls function in practice, how quickly incidents are detected and addressed, and whether third-party arrangements introduce systemic weakness.
In other words, ESMA’s CSA effectively raises the bar from formal compliance to operational credibility—an approach that can also reduce informational asymmetry between regulators, clients, and custodians about how well safeguards hold up when conditions deteriorate.
MiCA meets DORA: supply-chain risk and the challenge of concentrated custody tech
Legal analysis from Digital & Analogue Partners highlights why this particular CSA may be more complex than earlier supervisory activities. Yuriy Brisov, a lawyer at the firm, said the review sits at the intersection of two EU regulatory frameworks: MiCA, which establishes obligations for custody services, and DORA, which sets technology risk requirements for financial entities.
Brisov pointed to an industry reality that could complicate supervision: custody technology is concentrated among a small number of vendors. As a result, a single weak supplier can affect multiple custodians at once, making resilience not just a firm-level property but also a supply-chain question.
In that context, Brisov argued that proving resilience across the full supply chain under both MiCA and DORA simultaneously is the “real challenge for CASPs.” The practical implication for custodians is that they may need to show more than internal policies—they may also need to demonstrate that outsourced components and vendor dependencies are managed with sufficient depth, monitoring, and contingency planning.
ESMA’s approach could also set a benchmark for future supervisory expectations. Brisov suggested the CSA’s outcomes may inform how regulators evaluate MiCA-authorized custodians and feed into broader discussions about whether crypto supervision in the EU should become more centralized.
Why this CSA could shape the next phase of EU crypto supervision
Beyond the immediate assessment of participating CASPs, the CSA is positioned within ongoing EU policy debates. Brisov said the results could influence two active areas: the ongoing review of MiCA itself, and a proposal to shift supervision of all CASPs from national regulators to ESMA.
This matters to investors and clients because supervisory consistency is often critical when risk is cross-border and operational systems rely on similar technology stacks. If the EU moves toward more centralized oversight, firms may need to align their resilience reporting and control structures to a harmonized standard—making early preparation potentially advantageous.
At the same time, uncertainty remains about how ESMA will translate CSA findings into concrete regulatory expectations. The CSA is an assessment exercise, but its conclusions could later affect supervisory intensity, remediation requirements, or how firms design controls for key management, transaction operations, and incident handling.
For now, ESMA’s message to the custody market is straightforward: MiCA authorization is not the finish line. CASPs should watch what ESMA emphasizes in its resilience findings—especially around third-party dependencies and operational processes under stress—because those themes are likely to define what “acceptable” looks like in the next round of EU crypto supervision.
This article was originally published as MiCA Licensing Marks Start as Crypto Custodians Come Under Scrutiny on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Senate Democrats renewed calls for hearings into President Donald Trump’s crypto income and business ties before a legislative release. Five ranking members said disclosures raised national security, ethics, and conflict concerns involving the president’s family ventures. Their demand adds pressure to CLARITY Act negotiations, which could produce a Senate draft next week.
Democrats Seek Hearings Across Five Committees
Senators Elizabeth Warren, Richard Blumenthal, Gary Peters, Dick Durbin, and Ron Wyden asked chairs to schedule hearings. Each serves as ranking Democrat on a committee overseeing finance, security, justice, investigations, or taxation. They want officials to explain the structure, ownership, and foreign links surrounding Trump’s crypto businesses.
The lawmakers focused on World Liberty Financial, which Trump established with his sons and partners. They cited unclear outside ownership interests and questioned whether foreign participants could gain influence through financial ties. Their request also linked those concerns to decisions involving regulation, enforcement, and national security policy.
The senators previously sought scrutiny of a foreign investment involving World Liberty Financial and Trump-linked entities. They argued that Congress should examine whether financial relationships affected later administration decisions involving the same foreign government. However, the White House has rejected conflict claims and maintained that Trump acts for the public interest.
Financial Disclosures Put Crypto Income at Center
Trump reported more than $1.4 billion from family crypto ventures during 2025, according to his annual disclosure. Nearly $800 million came from World Liberty Financial, including token sales and transactions involving company ownership interests. The filing also listed about $635 million connected to sales of the Trump-branded meme coin.
Those figures made digital assets the largest reported source of Trump’s income during the year. His golf, resort, licensing, settlement, and property businesses produced substantial revenue, but crypto delivered the biggest total. The disclosure intensified questions about how federal policy could affect businesses that benefit the president and his family.
Trump has said his children manage the business interests, and outside funds handle his personal finances. Meanwhile, the White House has denied that the president or his family engaged in conflicts of interest. Still, Democrats argue that current arrangements do not remove financial benefits flowing to Trump-controlled trusts and related entities.
Ethics Dispute Complicates Clarity Act Talks
The CLARITY Act would divide digital asset oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It would establish rules for token disclosures, trading platforms, decentralized finance, customer assets, and illicit finance controls. The House passed its version in 2025, while Senate committees developed separate proposals during 2026.
The Senate Banking Committee advanced its market structure text in May, then began reconciling it with Agriculture Committee legislation. A combined draft could emerge next week, although disagreements remain over enforcement, agency leadership, and official financial interests. Any Senate measure would require reconciliation with the House bill before reaching the president.
Warren wants the legislation to restrict crypto profits for presidents, vice presidents, lawmakers, senior officials, and their immediate families. Other Democrats have tied their support to a strong ethics provision covering political figures and related business ventures. Without such language, the dispute could threaten bipartisan backing and delay the broader market structure package.
This article was originally published as Senate Democrats Seek Trump Crypto Hearings Before Clarity Act Release on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Ekosistem Solana terus membaik dalam hal performa, didukung oleh volume transaksi yang tinggi, pendapatan aplikasi terdesentralisasi, dan meningkatnya jumlah aset tokenisasi. Meskipun SOL menghadapi fluktuasi harga, metrik blockchain menunjukkan bahwa ekosistem ini menarik pengguna dan investor.
Statistik jaringan terbaru menunjukkan Solana memiliki salah satu tingkat aktivitas blockchain tertinggi di antara blockchain lainnya. Sementara itu, sinyal teknis menunjukkan bahwa pembeli mencoba membentuk rebound jangka pendek.

Dewan eksekutif New Hampshire telah menolak sebuah proposal yang memungkinkan negara bagian menerbitkan obligasi sebesar 100 juta dolar yang didukung oleh Bitcoin, sehingga menjadi pukulan bagi rencana yang berupaya memperluas penerimaan negara bagian terhadap pembiayaan aset digital.
Dalam sidang hari Rabu, panel beranggotakan lima orang itu memilih 3-2 menentang permintaan Otoritas Keuangan Bisnis New Hampshire (BFA) untuk menerbitkan obligasi yang didukung BTC. BFA telah menyetujui penerbitan tersebut pada November 2025, dan langkah itu juga mendapat dukungan dari Gubernur Kelly Ayotte.

Analis JPMorgan berpendapat bahwa adopsi blockchain yang tidak memberikan manfaat bagi blockchain publik dan tokennya menimbulkan risiko yang lebih besar bagi Bitcoin dibandingkan bagi Strategy dan program monetisasi BTC-nya.
Menurut laporan dari raksasa perbankan, investor memandang program monetisasi Strategy sebagai risiko bagi pasar kripto yang dapat menimbulkan tekanan jual berkala.
Strategy Bukan Risiko Terbesar Bitcoin
Para analis yang dipimpin oleh direktur pengelola Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou mengatakan bahwa jika tokenisasi, pembayaran, dan penyelesaian dilakukan di luar jaringan publik, ekosistem kripto yang lebih luas dapat mengalami aktivitas yang lebih rendah, likuiditas yang melemah, dan arus masuk modal yang lemah, yang dapat memberi tekanan pada Bitcoin.

Digital Chamber telah mengajukan amicus brief melawan gugatan di New York yang meminta untuk memperoleh 39.069 alamat dompet Bitcoin yang dormant dengan estimasi 3,7 juta BTC. Mereka mengatakan bahwa kasus ini dapat mengganggu konsep hak milik digital dan penyimpanan mandiri digital (digital self-custody).
Tantangan Digital Chamber terhadap Klaim Kepemilikan Dompet Bitcoin yang Dormant
Asosiasi perdagangan blockchain mengeluarkan pernyataan pada Senin yang mengatakan bahwa putusan semacam itu akan menimbulkan kebingungan mengenai siapa yang memiliki koin digital dalam ekosistem mata uang kripto. Mereka mengatakan bahwa dompet Bitcoin yang tidak aktif dan menyimpan sendiri (self-custodied) bukanlah properti yang ditinggalkan. Kelompok tersebut mengatakan teori para penggugat “memecah prinsip-prinsip dasar kepemilikan aset digital dan melampaui pasar kripto.”

Poin-Poin Penting
Harga Dogecoin diperdagangkan di bawah area resistance yang ditandai $0.07596 dan $0.07652.
Para bulls terus mempertahankan dukungan di $0.07437, menghindari potensi kerugian lebih lanjut.
Volume transaksi terus meningkat meskipun kinerja harga buruk.
Jebolnya dukungan akan membawa $0.07290 menjadi target berikutnya.
Tembusnya resistance di $0.07652 akan membatalkan pandangan bearish, sehingga harga bergerak menuju $0.07883.
Harga Dogecoin Bergerak dalam Zona Pengambilan Keputusan yang Menegangkan
Harga Dogecoin bergerak sideways karena baik pembeli maupun penjual terlibat pertempuran sengit untuk menguasai pasangan ini dalam jangka pendek. Meskipun para bulls telah berhasil mempertahankan level dukungan penting selama beberapa hari perdagangan terakhir, para penjual tidak menyerah dan masih bertahan cukup dekat dengan level resistance.

Poin-Poin Penting
Harga XRP tetap berada di atas support, sehingga mendukung sentimen pasar yang bullish.
Open interest dan aktivitas opsi menunjukkan partisipasi kuat dari para trader derivatif.
Breakout di atas resistance dapat memungkinkan bull untuk melaju lebih jauh.
Harga XRP Stabil Saat Sentimen Bullish Makin Menguat
Karena momentum bullish terus menguat di pasar spot maupun derivatif, XRP menarik perhatian. Para bull telah mempertahankan level-level support kunci, dan keterlibatan di pasar futures dan opsi menunjukkan bahwa para trader masih melihat potensi kenaikan untuk aset tersebut. Meskipun pergerakan harga telah melandai setelah kenaikan sebelumnya, sentimen tetap positif karena investor menunggu terjadinya breakout berikutnya.

Kripto di India tampaknya belum bisa mendapat jeda. Perkembangan terbaru memunculkan ketidakpastian baru setelah Bank Cadangan India (RBI) mendukung kebijakan yang melarang mata uang kripto, sementara Direktorat Pajak Penghasilan menyoroti kekhawatiran kepatuhan.
Meskipun sikap India yang masih ambigu terhadap mata uang kripto, negara ini tetap menjadi salah satu pasar terkemuka dalam adopsi kripto di tingkat akar rumput. Negara tersebut memiliki sekitar 39 juta pengguna, dengan nilai aset yang sedikit di atas $2 miliar.
RBI Mendorong Larangan Kripto
Kebijakan kripto India bisa tetap membingungkan untuk waktu yang akan datang setelah RBI menegaskan dukungannya terhadap kebijakan yang condong pada pelarangan mata uang kripto. Menurut pejabat dan dokumen yang diakses oleh Reuters, bank sentral ingin bank-bank dan institusi keuangan lainnya dilarang terpapar kripto dan stablecoin privat untuk membatasi risiko bagi pemberi pinjaman dan sistem keuangan yang lebih luas.

Bitcoin (BTC) dan pasar kripto yang lebih luas kembali mendapat tekanan setelah Presiden AS Donald Trump memperingatkan kemungkinan tindakan militer baru terhadap Iran, sehingga secara efektif mengakhiri gencatan senjata rapuh yang berlaku sejak April.
Kryptocurrency unggulan itu anjlok hampir 2% pada Rabu, jatuh ke level terendah $61.453 sebelum akhirnya menetap di $62.237. Yang lain juga mengalami nasib yang sama buruknya bahkan lebih buruk, dengan Ethereum (ETH) turun 1,34% menjadi $1.732. Ripple (XRP), Solana (SOL), Dogecoin (DOGE), Stellar (XLM), Chainlink (LINK), dan token lainnya juga diperdagangkan di wilayah merah.

Pelemahan/resistansi Bitcoin yang menembus batas terus menjadi salah satu peristiwa teknikal yang paling banyak dipantau di pasar di tengah pekan yang krusial untuk BTC. Meski berkali-kali BTC telah mempertahankan level dukungan penting, kini mata uang kripto tersebut kembali menguat menuju level resistansi menurun yang sebelumnya membatasi reli-reli sebelumnya.
Meski ada tekanan beli positif yang terlihat belakangan ini, masih ada beberapa kekhawatiran dari para trader menjelang perkiraan terjadinya penembusan oleh BTC. Ada indikasi yang jelas bahwa Bitcoin sedang menuju titik penentu.

Pasar mata uang kripto mencatat kerugian besar setelah ketegangan geopolitik baru memicu penjualan luas di seluruh aset digital. Bitcoin turun di bawah level $62.000, sementara Ethereum dan XRP memperpanjang penurunan selama koreksi yang melanda pasar secara keseluruhan. Pada saat yang sama, posisi dengan leverage senilai hampir $450 juta dilikuidasi, mencerminkan volatilitas yang lebih kuat di antara mata uang kripto utama.
Bitcoin Memimpin Likuidasi Pasar Kripto
Bitcoin mencatat volume likuidasi terbesar setelah para penjual mendorong aset itu melewati batas di bawah $62.000. Penurunan ini terjadi setelah ketidakpastian geopolitik kembali menguat menyusul pernyataan baru dari Presiden AS Donald Trump yang menyatakan memorandum of understanding dengan Iran telah berakhir. Akibatnya, para trader mengurangi eksposur terhadap aset berisiko seiring meningkatnya volatilitas.

Backpack, sebuah bursa kripto, telah meluncurkan perdagangan 24/7 untuk tokenized US equities terpilih, memberi pengguna internasional cara untuk memperdagangkan saham yang terkait dengan perusahaan seperti SpaceX, Micron, dan SanDisk di luar jam perdagangan pasar tradisional. Perusahaan mengatakan peluncuran awal berfokus pada kumpulan terbatas nama yang terdaftar di AS, dengan rencana penambahan kemudian.
Penawaran Backpack dirancang untuk memberikan kepemilikan langsung atas saham yang mendasarinya, bukan eksposur pasar sintetis. Pihak bursa menyatakan bahwa transaksi dapat diselesaikan secara instan dan didanai menggunakan mata uang fiat atau stablecoin.

Stablecoin semakin bertindak seperti infrastruktur khusus, bukan sekadar pengganti langsung. Data penggunaan terbaru yang disorot oleh Dune menunjukkan bahwa Tether’s USDT dan Circle’s USDC semakin mengkonsolidasikan diri di sekitar peran yang berbeda di ranah on-chain dan dunia nyata—USDT cenderung masuk ke pembayaran komersial, sementara USDC tetap sangat terkait dengan aktivitas keuangan terdesentralisasi (DeFi).
Di saat yang sama, kerangka MiCA Eropa tampaknya mempercepat permintaan untuk stablecoin yang dipatok terhadap euro, sementara keuangan tradisional terus menunjukkan minat yang semakin besar terhadap tokenisasi. Di tempat lain dalam Crypto Biz, penjualan Bitcoin terbaru dari Strategy untuk mendanai dividen kepada pemegang saham telah membuka kembali perbincangan seputar sikap perusahaan yang “tidak pernah menjual”, dan Vanguard telah bergerak lebih dekat ke aset digital dengan merekrut kepala divisi tersebut.

Pantulan terbaru Bitcoin menuju kisaran pertengahan 60.000 dolar telah menarik perhatian baru dari analis on-chain, dengan komentar terbaru yang mengarah pada aktivitas paus AS sebagai pendorong awal momentum dari sisi permintaan. Secara terpisah, Bitcoin Suisse menyoroti tanda-tanda bahwa kondisi pasar mungkin sedang bergeser—meskipun kehati-hatian yang terus berlanjut terlihat pada arus dana ETF spot Bitcoin AS.
Menurut unggahan blog hari Jumat dari kontributor CryptoQuant Burak Kesmeci, "Coinbase Premium" menunjukkan bukti menguatnya perilaku beli dari sisi penawaran, bahkan ketika pembacaan yang lebih luas untuk indeks masih berada di bawah level netral.

The U.S. Federal Reserve telah menunjuk Marc Andreessen, seorang co-founder Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), untuk membantu memimpin satuan tugas baru yang menelaah bagaimana kecerdasan buatan dan teknologi umum lainnya dapat mengubah produktivitas dan pekerjaan.
Bersama Andreessen, satuan tugas Produktivitas dan Pekerjaan milik The Fed akan mencakup Charles I. Jones dari Stanford University dan Asha Sharma, wakil presiden eksekutif Microsoft dan CEO Xbox. Mandat kelompok tersebut adalah menilai potensi dampak pada lapangan kerja dan produktivitas dari teknologi seperti AI untuk menginformasikan perumusan kebijakan bank sentral di masa depan. The Fed menguraikan penunjukan tersebut dalam rilis pers pada hari Kamis.

Jaksa AS telah mengajukan dakwaan pidana baru terhadap Rossen Iossifov, warga negara Bulgaria yang telah menjalani hukuman penjara federal, dengan tuduhan bahwa ia membantu memindahkan dan mencuci sekitar $290.000 dalam mata uang kripto yang terkait dengan perintah perampasan oleh pengadilan. Departemen Kehakiman mengatakan dugaan perbuatan itu terjadi pada Januari 2024, setelah sebuah pengadilan federal memerintahkan aset dirampas menyusul vonis sebelumnya terhadap Iossifov.
Menurut DOJ, kripto tersebut disimpan dalam akun Kraken yang terdaftar atas nama Iossifov dan telah dibekukan selama penyidikan. Para jaksa menuduh bahwa ia dan pihak lain menarik dan memindahkan aset menggunakan layanan mixing dan bursa kripto untuk mengaburkan jejak—sebelum pemerintah dapat mengambil alih aset tersebut.

Bank investasi AS utama sedang memperketat aturan internal terkait perdagangan pasar prediksi, menurut laporan CNBC. Langkah ini didorong oleh kekhawatiran bahwa karyawan dapat menggunakan informasi nonpublik saat memperdagangkan kontrak berbasis peristiwa—isu yang kian mendapat sorotan pengawasan regulasi dan politik di Amerika Serikat.
CNBC mengatakan Goldman Sachs dilaporkan telah melarang karyawan untuk memperdagangkan kontrak peristiwa tertentu yang terkait dengan bank tersebut, termasuk yang terkait dengan pasar keuangan, perkembangan makroekonomi, pemilihan umum, dan geopolitik. Sementara itu, Morgan Stanley dan Bank of America juga telah menetapkan atau tengah menyiapkan pembatasan bagi karyawan, yang menunjukkan betapa cepatnya pasar prediksi berkembang dari konsep yang masih niche menjadi area yang regulator dan pembuat kebijakan bersedia untuk diselidiki.

Penambang Bitcoin yang terdaftar di AS dan penyedia layanan hosting TeraWulf dilaporkan tengah menjajaki paket pembiayaan utang besar yang ditujukan untuk memperluas kampus Justified Data di Kentucky, sebuah lokasi yang terkait dengan kebutuhan komputasi AI jangka panjang melalui perjanjian sewa dengan Anthropic.
Menurut laporan Bloomberg pada hari Kamis, chief financial officer TeraWulf Patrick Fleury mengatakan perusahaan diperkirakan akan mencari pendanaan utang sebesar $3,5 miliar, dengan investment bank Morgan Stanley memimpin upaya tersebut. Pendanaan itu disebut-sebut berpotensi mencakup pinjaman beragunan (leveraged loans) dan obligasi berimbal hasil tinggi—langkah pertama TeraWulf masuk ke pasar pinjaman beragunan.