nft

HE SOLD A DIGITAL COLLECTION FOR 69.3 MILLION USD. WHICH TOKENS ARE TIED TO THE NFT SECTOR?

In 2007, digital artist Beeple began creating one new artwork every single day. He sustained this disciplined output for over 13 years, ultimately producing one of the most significant narratives in contemporary digital art history.
In March 2021, his composite work, Everydays: The First 5000 Days, sold at a Christie's auction for 69.3 million USD.
Beyond its cultural impact, this event highlighted how public blockchains enabled a new market for digital assets and verifiable digital ownership.

Key Tokens in the NFT Ecosystem
$ETH (Ethereum): Beeple’s landmark NFT was minted on the Ethereum blockchain. ETH serves as the primary currency for network transaction fees (gas) and functions as the foundational settlement asset for the broader NFT infrastructure.
RARI (Rarible): The governance token associated with the Rarible NFT marketplace ecosystem. It represents the sector of decentralized platforms designed for minting, listing, and trading digital collectibles.
$APE (ApeCoin): The utility and governance token linked to the Yuga Labs ecosystem and mainstream Web3 culture. This represents a distinct consumer/community segment within the digital asset market, independent of Beeple's individual sale.

Is There an Investment Opportunity?
The Beeple transaction demonstrated that digital art can command top-tier valuations. However, high-profile individual sales do not imply that every NFT or sector-related token will experience sustained price appreciation.
When analyzing this market, primary consideration belongs to ETH as core underlying infrastructure, while application-level assets like RARI and $APE require isolated fundamental evaluation - focused on actual platform volume, project activity, and broader market risks.

#nft #FOMO #BeepleArt #Ethereum

Pudgy Penguins Just Launched THE HUDDLE — $PENGU Holders Are Getting a Bigger Role! 🐧

CONFIRMED: On October 29, Pudgy Penguins launched The Huddle, a new community hub bringing together Pudgy NFT collectors, holders, and people connected to its global brand.

On October 30, the team announced another benefit: eligible Pudgy NFT holders and 245 Set 4 licensees can claim a free booster box from the upcoming Vibes TCG collection, with claims closing November 6.

WHY IT MATTERS: The Huddle aims to unite the NFT community, token holders, collectors, and brand supporters under one ecosystem.

THE CATCH: Community growth does not automatically translate into PENGU buying pressure. Token demand and real adoption remain important.

Click the $PENGU widget below and check the latest developments.

$PENGU
.
.
.

#PudgyPenguins #Solana #nft #Crypto #write2earn
Not financial advice. DYOR.

Blur is shutting down its NFT marketplace on November 12.

Once the largest Ethereum NFT marketplace, Blur has announced the closure date, per OriginBrief's October monthly report. Meanwhile $ETH closed October at $2,252.50, down 16.1% (Cryptowatch Desk).

My take: NFT trading volume has been thin for a long time, and consolidation looks like the next chapter. Marketplaces without a clear second product are struggling.

Do you still hold NFTs, or have you moved fully to fungible tokens? What would bring you back?

#NFT #Blur #Ethereum $ETH

Scored 4 more free mints on BSC—only paid gas 👇

• Hexagent #1795 (first 3333 free, 2 per wallet)
• Dronegent #2185 (first 5555 free)
• Oathbots Pass #2151
• JINLONG Golden Dragon, 50 million tokens (claimFree, pool launch pending)

Contracts:
Hexagent 0x7ba27f90c7b509af1dfbda2a788fe4488ff3aab4
Dronegent 0xf6ab7131b01f0a94e8860c284fc904d09ed0373b
OPASS 0x1bB3701DA38D1572984Cd200821d1162d6783435
JINLONG 0x2df4ef534cbbe1a8f647e24d0f8c75ece74d8288

No approvals needed. Simulate first, then transact if it passes. Small projects are volatile—DYOR.

#BNBChain #FreeMint #NFT

📊 The celebrities’ apes didn’t lose money; the people who came later paid the price

We can finally tally the bill for celebrity NFTs.

First, let’s see how much money is still in the market. Two CryptoSlam snapshots: the week of October 31 saw $42.13 million; the week of November 3, $37.69 million. Buyer wallets rose from 216,000 to 244,000. The average sale price slipped from $45 to $42.

Less money, more people, prices in the low forties. A flea market.

Now let’s look at the celebrities’ ledgers. There are two kinds of people.

Jay Chou’s Phanta Bear collection had 10,000 NFTs, priced at 0.26 ETH each, and sold out in 40 minutes. His management company later clarified that the batch he had was gifted by the project team; he wasn’t involved in running the project and received no proceeds. With zero cost, there’s nothing to lose.

Justin Bieber was different. In January 2022, he spent 500 ETH on Bored Ape #3001, worth about $1.3 million at the time. Today, the floor price for the collection is 5.68 ETH, or about $12,700. A 99% drop. In four years.

CryptoBriefing and Yahoo have both reported this figure, and their numbers match.

Hong Kong actor Shawn Yue’s ZombieClub launched 6,666 NFTs in March 2022, priced at 0.666 ETH each. Today, the floor price is 0.0093 ETH, about $21, with zero sales in 24 hours. Stephen Chow’s Nobody collection had 10,000 NFTs, with a reference launch price of 0.195 ETH. Now the floor is 0.0269 ETH, about $60, also with zero sales.

No sales. You can list at whatever price you want; there’s no one on the other side.

Hong Kong actor Alex Fong said on a program last month that during the two years of the pandemic, he had just bought a house when work came to a halt and his income disappeared. So he bought the hottest NFT at the time. He lost more than he did in stocks—so much that he didn’t dare tell his family. His wife asked several times how many digits the loss was. He didn’t answer.

So who’s still buying? Courtyard topped last week’s sales rankings at $8.54 million, accounting for 22% of the week’s total. Behind it are graded physical cards, locked in a warehouse; the on-chain token is just a claim ticket for collecting them. In second place was BRC-20, from the Bitcoin ecosystem, at $2.82 million. Further down were CryptoPunks at $1.81 million and Bored Apes at $1.28 million, down 66% for the week.

It’s clear where the money is going: it’s all crowding into the few things that have counterparties, physical assets, or a shared belief behind them.

Five BTC price sources put it between 76,303 and 76,483, all down by around 1%. ETH was between 2,244 and 2,249.

What celebrities sold back then was really an entry ticket. The image was just what was printed on it.

#中本聪国际社区Baoluo币商资本 #NFT #EntertainmentEconomy

@UnseenOrdo and Korean project GIWA UP have teamed up for a giveaway: 1 free GIWA UP mint and 3 priority mints. The official description says GIWA UP is a collection of 2,222 Tilekeeper NFTs inspired by Korean history and traditional crafts.

Honestly, I didn’t know much about this theme before, but UNSEEN has always talked about “people forgotten by history,” so this collaboration seems like a good fit. To enter, just follow both accounts, join Telegram, like, and repost—the cost is practically zero. I’ll give it a try, without getting my hopes up too much.

Would you rather enter for a free mint spot, or complete whitelist tasks to earn Sparks for a discount? Just my personal take—DYOR. $BTC #NFT #UNSEEN

The more I look at this Argonauts thing, the more it makes me laugh.

JBond, who holds an 85K-follower account, posted on Sunday: “It’s been almost two weeks since the last art change. The floor’s been falling the whole time. When’s the next upgrade?” That very evening, artist a.c.k. changed all 9,977 pieces to Max Pain V3 with a single click. The next day, the floor rose 20% to 30% (figures vary by source; @zartash put the floor at 0.62 ETH, with 54 ETH in sales).

The comments were full of praise: “Best customer service” and “the artist who understands holders best.”

I see it differently. You pay for a piece of art, and someone else can replace it all with a single decision. According to @frosty_eth, this was already the 14th art change. The project only minted in late August, so that works out to roughly one change every five days.

The NFT world has been shouting “fully on-chain, permanently immutable” for years. Here, it’s the exact opposite: the code is on-chain, but the artist controls the rendering, so what you actually hold is just a token number. The contract spells out that the art can change. You cheer when it changes into something you like, but if one day it changes into something you don’t, there’s nowhere to complain.

Even more absurdly, the floor is now being propped up by “art changes.” Price action has shifted from holding to waiting for the next event. An art change is basically a bullish announcement—same playbook as a project team periodically dropping news to support the price. For those who’d watched the floor fall for two weeks, this time it gave them a way out.

If you want to play, think of it as buying a ticket to an ongoing performance-art piece by the artist—not a blue chip. #NFT

I came across a new NFT project today: Pocket (pocketpad).

The founder is also the author of ERC-8426 and the founder of WalletChi.

Pocket is launching 2,500 Seeds this time. After minting, you can keep your Seed as is or start growing it.

If you don't water it for 24 hours, it wilts; after 72 hours, it dies and turns into a Spirit.

The most special thing is that rarity isn't random—the longer you grow it, the rarer the resulting Spirit will be.

What's more, the NFT can be added directly to Apple Wallet / Google Wallet, with no need to download a separate app.

The mint price, blockchain, and timing haven't been announced yet. This combination of mobile wallets and grow-to-earn NFTs is worth keeping an eye on.

#NFT #Pocket #Web3 #数字藏品 #nurturing

After looking into Argonauts, I can only say one thing: what you bought was never the image.

On November 1, JBOND complained that the floor had been dropping for two weeks and publicly told the artist to upgrade the art. Alpha Centauri Kid replied, "you want an upgrade huh," then replaced all 9,999 pixel skulls on OpenSea with "max pain v3" in one go. Note: all of them. No one's signature or consent required.

Then the floor went up about 25% (according to JBOND himself). Everyone was laughing, making memes, calling it the most honest roadmap in crypto.

It's a good joke, but don't laugh for too long. “Fully on-chain, with a renderer that can be changed at any time” is what the project team calls “art that can evolve.” In plain English, it means the artist has the final say over what your asset looks like. It's a prank today, but what if he's in a bad mood tomorrow?

Even funnier, someone replied that all the Argos look the same now, so it doesn't matter which one you swap out. Rarity went to zero overnight, and the floor went up anyway—which shows that what people were speculating on in the first place wasn't the art, but the hype and the artist himself.

I'm not against buying this kind of thing. Just stop using “permanent ownership of on-chain art” as your reason for buying. What you own is an ID in a contract, plus your trust in the artist's character.

#NFT

This Robinhood Chain NFT run is, frankly, just a relay race of “buy A, get whitelisted for B.”

According to X News, the floor price of WIF Outlaws (2,222 NFTs) jumped 20%–40% in a day. The hype man was once again crypto_czar_eth, with the slogan “Outlaw fp 1000刀 by Christmas... Coded.”
The same guy previously called for a 10 ETH floor on Quotrons, then got exposed for selling about a third of his holdings. Now Quotrons are down to around 0.949 ETH, below 1 ETH for the first time in two months. The peak was 3.5 ETH.

Now, where’s the demand coming from?
Web Hood announced a partnership with WIF Outlaws. Holding 2 Outlaws guarantees you a mint spot, and Web Hood itself increased its supply to 3,000 because its “community is too hyped.”
Over at TOTZ, the top 100 wallets by Outlaws holdings at the snapshot each get one free mint.

So you’re not buying a picture of a skull; you’re buying a ticket to the next project. That ticket is only valuable if people buy into the next project, which in turn depends on the one after that… These nesting-doll schemes rise fast, but if one link breaks, you get Quotrons: nobody cares who got out first.

The shillers can say “Coded” at zero cost, push up the floor, and the people who can sell first are those who already had inventory. If you want to play, treat it as a short-term ticket. Don’t buy into the “generational wealth” spiel—some accounts pushing that phrase have only a few hundred followers themselves.

#NFT #RobinhoodChain

Talis Protocol was hacked on Saturday, and 5,700 NFTs were looted. They sold for a median price of just 2 cents, generating less than $3,100 in profit. All the funds were bridged to Ethereum, and refunds are nowhere in sight. This has been a devastating blow to the Injective ecosystem.

INJ

#NFT #Injective #Scam

Something new has quietly launched on BNB Chain.

OAGENT Units — a collection of 3,333. Rarity isn’t drawn; it’s calculated. Every mint is a proof of work: the stronger the proof, the rarer the unit. 20 leading zeros makes a shrimp. What about 30? A legendary whale — currently the only one in the entire network.

Today, the collection opened its own on-chain marketplace. No middlemen, no reliance on external platforms — listings, floor prices, and settlements all happen directly on-chain.

Current status:
· 5 / 3,333 minted — minting is still open
· Floor price: 0.001 BNB
· Unit #1 (Epic Shark, 24 zeros) listed for 0.001 BNB
· Unit #4 (Legendary Whale, 30 zeros) listed for 0.01 BNB

Take a look for yourself: https://oagent.pages.dev

#OAGENT #BNBChain #NFT

【Market Alert】5,700 NFTs stolen, yielding only about $3,100
NFT marketplace Talis has suspended listings and auctions. The attacker exploited a vulnerability to withdraw about 5,700 NFTs held in escrow and sold them off for about 2 cents each, receiving only around 445 INJ. Talis says it will return the stolen NFTs, and the patch is under review. Is this bullish or bearish for NFT security? Share your thoughts in the comments.
$INJ $ETH $BTC
#币安广场 #NFT #Injective
(Source: CryptoBriefing)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution.

Robinhood Chain’s NFTs are playing a very old game of nesting dolls.

Suited Ape Society has 2,222 NFTs. Its floor price climbed from around $200 to just over $500, while the total trading volume cited in X posts is only around $500,000. $500,000 wouldn’t even amount to a blue-chip collection’s daily volume on Ethereum mainnet, but here it’s enough to fuel a “bull run.”

What’s really pushing the floor price up isn’t the long list of utilities—staking, poker, games, mining rewards—but “hold this, get the next one for free.” A post by @crypto_czar_eth with over 5,700 views put it plainly: there’d be no Outlaw, Suited Ape, or Vaultling if you sold, because I’m waiting to claim a free Mutant as a Suited Ape holder. Vaultlings followed the same playbook earlier, with SAS holders getting GTD.

The logic is simple: a new project gives away NFTs to holders of an older project → the older project’s floor price rises → everyone waits for the next free mint. Each layer’s value is “given” by the next one. This structure already played out on Ethereum in 2021, and the ones left holding the bag were the people who rushed in near the peak floor price to “get a spot.”

The comments are full of “Need to get myself a suited ape soon” and “1 ETH 🚀.” That’s the signal—not that sentiment is good, but that fresh money has finally been called in.

I’m not saying it’s about to go to zero. The community and the team’s development pace may be genuine. But think carefully about whether the $500 you’re paying buys you a picture or a “ticket to the next airdrop.” The more tickets get handed out, the less they’re worth.

#RobinhoodChain #NFT

😱 $BLUR NFT PANIC: WHEN THE FBI NAMES NAMES, THE SECONDARY MARKET TREMBLES

The FBI confirmed this Saturday that TraderTraitor, the North Korean unit, was behind the Binance heist. To me, that changes the whole story: this is no longer a technical glitch that can be fixed with a patch, but a state-sponsored attack against the largest exchange—and markets where value moves on borrowed trust, like NFTs, are the first to feel it.

Look at the detail nobody is noticing:
→ The FBI attributed the attack to TraderTraitor and expects more laundering of the stolen funds through related technology, according to its statement on Saturday.
→ BLUR -9.8% with $18.0M, while $MAGIC +1.4% rises and $XAI -2.2% falls much less among NFTs.
→ Entry $0.00802–$0.00806, SL $0.00809, TP1 $0.00783 (-2.6%) → TP2 $0.00767 (-4.6%).

Will BLUR lose $0.00783 tonight, or will the NFT market weather the blow? 👇

$BLUR $MAGIC $XAI

#Blur #NFT #Trading

I’ve been looking at FREEDZ’s “deflationary” narrative for a while, and the more I look, the more it seems like they’re dressing up an exit route as a selling point.

The mechanism is laid out by the team themselves: half the royalties from every secondary-market sale go into the community treasury, and any holder can burn a FREEDZ to claim all the ETH accumulated in the treasury. The official account even posted a dedicated message: keep it for the art, or burn it to claim the prize pool—it’s your choice.

So where does the money in the treasury come from? Royalties paid by whoever buys in later. The more people burn, the prettier the “deflation” looks. In reality, it’s the people who time it right taking the later buyers’ fees, then turning the reduced supply around and calling it bullish. That’s not a deflationary model; it’s musical chairs.

On October 30, the official account first announced “nearly 190 burned in under 24 hours,” then posted “200+” that afternoon, using it to pump the hype numbers. Around the same time, someone shared their sales: six sold in a day, at $16 to $36 each, for a total of $135, with the caption “not bad.” With a collection of 8,888 and the floor at this level, you can figure out for yourself how much ETH the treasury could possibly hold.

It’s also pretty clear how the hype is generated: a team member posted, “Comment if you have a FREEDZ pfp and I’ll follow you all,” got 64 replies, and then the feed filled up with Fre dz follows FREEDZ follow-backs. They climbed to number one on OpenSea’s weekly rankings with 44 posts from holders. A leaderboard boosted by follow-for-follow isn’t the same thing as real buying demand.

The text-based profile pictures are genuinely nice—I’m not knocking that. But don’t treat “burn it to claim the treasury” as a source of value. That door is there for the earliest people to leave.

#NFT #FREEDZ

🎨 $RARE NFT ECSTASY: DIGITAL ART WAKES UP IN OCTOBER

SuperRare is coming off a string of October releases — the latest, GIFcraft on the 26th, with 54 artist-made GIFs — and today RARE is leading the NFT pack. To me, when a platform keeps launching, the token eventually pays off: digital art moves on catalog, not promises.

Look at the detail nobody is seeing:
→ SuperRare launched GIFcraft on October 26 (54 GIFs), following Sine on the 20th and Unfinished Past on the 15th: October was a month of launches, not silence.
→ RARE +3.5% with $1.9M, while OGN +0.3% and MAGIC +1.2% lag behind among NFTs.
→ Entry $0.01244–$0.01271, SL $0.01228, TP1 $0.01404 (+11.6%) → TP2 $0.01459 (+16.0%).

Would you buy RARE targeting $0.01404, or wait for it to confirm above that level? 👇

$RARE

#SuperRare #NFT #Trading

Pudgy’s card-pack giveaway came at a very convenient time—so convenient it feels a little deliberate.

The Huddle launched on October 30, giving one box of Vibes TCG Series 4 card packs to each Pudgy NFT. It’s per NFT, not per wallet, and claims are open until November 6. Luca himself admitted in Inner Igloo that they’ve “always been pretty bad” at getting products into holders’ hands.

The issue is the timing. Just weeks ago, Igloo announced that the Abstract chain would shut down on December 15, with an estimated $47–48 million in assets still stuck on-chain. Builders over there are accusing the team of stabbing them in the back, while over here the official account is handing out card packs. The media headline practically writes itself: “Card-pack giveaway vs. backlash over Abstract shutdown.”

Put simply, a box of physical card packs is a fun little bonus for whales, but it means nothing to teams that have spent a year or two building on Abstract. This reassures NFT holders—the very people most likely to defend the floor price—not those hit hardest by the chain shutting down.

I’m not saying Pudgy is a bad project. Its IP and offline distribution are genuinely among the few things in the NFT space that have real potential. But remember this playbook: a brand company shuts down a chain, then tries to soothe people with merch. Next time someone starts talking about “our own L2” and “building the ecosystem together,” ask one thing first: if they decide they’re done one day, what happens to your assets and code?

#PudgyPenguins #NFT