#mev
mev
172,075 views
390 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
උණුසුම්
නවතම
·
--
ලිපිය
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
You Click Swap. What Happens Before It Confirms?Your Crypto Transaction Isn’t Always First Come, First Served
You make a swap.
You confirm it, pay the fee, and wait for the transaction to land on-chain.
Most people think the process is basically a queue:
I submitted first, so I should be processed first.
That assumption breaks down on some blockchains.
The interesting part is what happens before your transaction is confirmed.
Where MEV enters 🤔
MEV, or Maximal Extractable Value, is about the value that can be captured by controlling which transactions are included in a block and, importantly, the order they appear in.
That sounds technical, but the idea is fairly simple.
Say you are making a large swap on a decentralized exchange. Your transaction is sitting pending, and its execution could move the price of the token.
Automated traders are watching the same market.
If your trade creates an opportunity, they may try to get their own transaction positioned around yours.
That's where one of the most talked about MEV strategies comes in: the sandwich attack.
A trade can become the opportunity
Imagine you submit a large buy.
A bot gets its transaction in before yours.
Your trade pushes the token price higher.
The bot then sells after your transaction executes.
The exact mechanics depend on the blockchain and trading venue, but the basic idea is that your order creates a price movement that someone else tries to trade around.
And this is why transaction ordering matters.
It's not simply about who arrived first.
But calling all MEV “bad” misses the point
Arbitrage is another example.
If a token is trading at $100 on one decentralized exchange and $101 on another, a trader can buy on the cheaper venue and sell on the more expensive one.
That trade can capture MEV, but it can also help push the two prices closer together.
So there are two different conversations here.
Some MEV strategies can extract value from ordinary users.
Others are part of the competitive process that keeps fragmented markets more efficient.
The important thing is understanding who is getting the value and why.
Why should a normal user care?
Because MEV can turn something that looks like a simple swap into a more complicated execution problem.
Your final execution price can depend on liquidity, slippage, transaction ordering and what other participants are doing at the same time.
This becomes more noticeable with large trades or thin liquidity.
There isn't a magic button that makes MEV disappear.
But basic precautions help.
Keep slippage as tight as reasonably possible. Check whether your wallet or trading route provides MEV protection. And don't treat a fast confirmation as automatically meaning a better execution.
The bigger lesson for me is simple:
On-chain, your transaction isn't operating in isolation.
There are other traders, bots, validators, block builders and liquidity providers reacting to the same information.
Once you understand that, “I clicked swap” stops being the whole story.
The transaction still has to find its place in the block.
And that place can have a price.
Have you ever checked how your swap was actually executed after confirmation?
#MEV #defi #blockchain
$ETH
You Click Swap. What Happens Before It Confirms?
Your Crypto Transaction Isn’t Always First Come, First Served
You make a swap.
You confirm it, pay the fee, and wait for the transaction to land on-chain.
Most people think the process is basically a queue:
I submitted first, so I should be processed first.
That assumption breaks down on some blockchains.
The interesting part is what happens before your transaction is confirmed.
Where MEV enters 🤔
MEV, or Maximal Extractable Value, is about the value that can be captured by controlling which transactions are included in a block and, importantly, the order they appear in.
That sounds technical, but the idea is fairly simple.
Say you are making a large swap on a decentralized exchange. Your transaction is sitting pending, and its execution could move the price of the token.
Automated traders are watching the same market.
If your trade creates an opportunity, they may try to get their own transaction positioned around yours.
That's where one of the most talked about MEV strategies comes in: the sandwich attack.
A trade can become the opportunity
Imagine you submit a large buy.
A bot gets its transaction in before yours.
Your trade pushes the token price higher.
The bot then sells after your transaction executes.
The exact mechanics depend on the blockchain and trading venue, but the basic idea is that your order creates a price movement that someone else tries to trade around.
And this is why transaction ordering matters.
It's not simply about who arrived first.
But calling all MEV “bad” misses the point
Arbitrage is another example.
If a token is trading at $100 on one decentralized exchange and $101 on another, a trader can buy on the cheaper venue and sell on the more expensive one.
That trade can capture MEV, but it can also help push the two prices closer together.
So there are two different conversations here.
Some MEV strategies can extract value from ordinary users.
Others are part of the competitive process that keeps fragmented markets more efficient.
The important thing is understanding who is getting the value and why.
Why should a normal user care?
Because MEV can turn something that looks like a simple swap into a more complicated execution problem.
Your final execution price can depend on liquidity, slippage, transaction ordering and what other participants are doing at the same time.
This becomes more noticeable with large trades or thin liquidity.
There isn't a magic button that makes MEV disappear.
But basic precautions help.
Keep slippage as tight as reasonably possible. Check whether your wallet or trading route provides MEV protection. And don't treat a fast confirmation as automatically meaning a better execution.
The bigger lesson for me is simple:
On-chain, your transaction isn't operating in isolation.
There are other traders, bots, validators, block builders and liquidity providers reacting to the same information.
Once you understand that, “I clicked swap” stops being the whole story.
The transaction still has to find its place in the block.
And that place can have a price.
Have you ever checked how your swap was actually executed after confirmation?
#MEV #defi #blockchain
$ETH
You make a swap.
You confirm it, pay the fee, and wait for the transaction to land on-chain.
Most people think the process is basically a queue:
I submitted first, so I should be processed first.
That assumption breaks down on some blockchains.
The interesting part is what happens before your transaction is confirmed.
Where MEV enters 🤔
MEV, or Maximal Extractable Value, is about the value that can be captured by controlling which transactions are included in a block and, importantly, the order they appear in.
That sounds technical, but the idea is fairly simple.
Say you are making a large swap on a decentralized exchange. Your transaction is sitting pending, and its execution could move the price of the token.
Automated traders are watching the same market.
If your trade creates an opportunity, they may try to get their own transaction positioned around yours.
That's where one of the most talked about MEV strategies comes in: the sandwich attack.
A trade can become the opportunity
Imagine you submit a large buy.
A bot gets its transaction in before yours.
Your trade pushes the token price higher.
The bot then sells after your transaction executes.
The exact mechanics depend on the blockchain and trading venue, but the basic idea is that your order creates a price movement that someone else tries to trade around.
And this is why transaction ordering matters.
It's not simply about who arrived first.
But calling all MEV “bad” misses the point
Arbitrage is another example.
If a token is trading at $100 on one decentralized exchange and $101 on another, a trader can buy on the cheaper venue and sell on the more expensive one.
That trade can capture MEV, but it can also help push the two prices closer together.
So there are two different conversations here.
Some MEV strategies can extract value from ordinary users.
Others are part of the competitive process that keeps fragmented markets more efficient.
The important thing is understanding who is getting the value and why.
Why should a normal user care?
Because MEV can turn something that looks like a simple swap into a more complicated execution problem.
Your final execution price can depend on liquidity, slippage, transaction ordering and what other participants are doing at the same time.
This becomes more noticeable with large trades or thin liquidity.
There isn't a magic button that makes MEV disappear.
But basic precautions help.
Keep slippage as tight as reasonably possible. Check whether your wallet or trading route provides MEV protection. And don't treat a fast confirmation as automatically meaning a better execution.
The bigger lesson for me is simple:
On-chain, your transaction isn't operating in isolation.
There are other traders, bots, validators, block builders and liquidity providers reacting to the same information.
Once you understand that, “I clicked swap” stops being the whole story.
The transaction still has to find its place in the block.
And that place can have a price.
Have you ever checked how your swap was actually executed after confirmation?
#MEV #defi #blockchain
$ETH
2
133
·
--
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
📰 Solana 联创 Toly 又和 Arbitrum 联创 Steven Goldfeder 对上了，这次吵的还是那句老话：别只看表面手续费。
Toly 的意思很直白，Arbitrum 现在买卖价差更大，手续费也更高；光按手续费里 10% 的抽成算，成本就已经比夹子交易费率高了，算上更差的价差，整体成本他估算能高出约 10 倍。
💡 Steven 那边的说法也不是没道理，他强调 Arbitrum One 和 Robinhood Chain 都在防抢跑和有害 MEV，很多人爱拿“低手续费”说事，但散户最后可能是被抢跑、夹子交易这些隐性成本慢慢吃掉。
说实话，这场争论本质上不是谁嗓门大，而是大家到底更在意“明面手续费”还是“整笔交易最后花了多少”。单一排序器这套模式，Toly 直接说永远打不过无需许可的市场竞争。
🤔 这种时候看链，真不能只盯着一个数字。你会更信“便宜但可能有隐形损耗”，还是“贵一点但机制更稳”？
#Solana #Arbitrum #MEV #链上交易
📰 Solana 联创 Toly 又和 Arbitrum 联创 Steven Goldfeder 对上了，这次吵的还是那句老话：别只看表面手续费。
Toly 的意思很直白，Arbitrum 现在买卖价差更大，手续费也更高；光按手续费里 10% 的抽成算，成本就已经比夹子交易费率高了，算上更差的价差，整体成本他估算能高出约 10 倍。
💡 Steven 那边的说法也不是没道理，他强调 Arbitrum One 和 Robinhood Chain 都在防抢跑和有害 MEV，很多人爱拿“低手续费”说事，但散户最后可能是被抢跑、夹子交易这些隐性成本慢慢吃掉。
说实话，这场争论本质上不是谁嗓门大，而是大家到底更在意“明面手续费”还是“整笔交易最后花了多少”。单一排序器这套模式，Toly 直接说永远打不过无需许可的市场竞争。
🤔 这种时候看链，真不能只盯着一个数字。你会更信“便宜但可能有隐形损耗”，还是“贵一点但机制更稳”？
#Solana #Arbitrum #MEV #链上交易
Toly 的意思很直白，Arbitrum 现在买卖价差更大，手续费也更高；光按手续费里 10% 的抽成算，成本就已经比夹子交易费率高了，算上更差的价差，整体成本他估算能高出约 10 倍。
💡 Steven 那边的说法也不是没道理，他强调 Arbitrum One 和 Robinhood Chain 都在防抢跑和有害 MEV，很多人爱拿“低手续费”说事，但散户最后可能是被抢跑、夹子交易这些隐性成本慢慢吃掉。
说实话，这场争论本质上不是谁嗓门大，而是大家到底更在意“明面手续费”还是“整笔交易最后花了多少”。单一排序器这套模式，Toly 直接说永远打不过无需许可的市场竞争。
🤔 这种时候看链，真不能只盯着一个数字。你会更信“便宜但可能有隐形损耗”，还是“贵一点但机制更稳”？
#Solana #Arbitrum #MEV #链上交易
219
·
--
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
LayerZero 联合 Oblivious Labs 与卡内基梅隆大学发布论文，提出抗 MEV 的新型 AMM 机制 OTTER。
OTTER 通过类似 VCG 拍卖的批量清算机制，使交易者如实报告估值和预算成为占优策略，并削弱区块构建者通过交易排序、夹子攻击或注入虚假出价获利的能力。
原本可能被 MEV 捕获的剩余价值，将重新分配给流动性提供者、交易者、流动性池或底层链验证者，减少构建者优势对生态价值分配的影响。
#LayerZero #MEV #DeFi #AMM
LayerZero 联合 Oblivious Labs 与卡内基梅隆大学发布论文，提出抗 MEV 的新型 AMM 机制 OTTER。
OTTER 通过类似 VCG 拍卖的批量清算机制，使交易者如实报告估值和预算成为占优策略，并削弱区块构建者通过交易排序、夹子攻击或注入虚假出价获利的能力。
原本可能被 MEV 捕获的剩余价值，将重新分配给流动性提供者、交易者、流动性池或底层链验证者，减少构建者优势对生态价值分配的影响。
#LayerZero #MEV #DeFi #AMM
OTTER 通过类似 VCG 拍卖的批量清算机制，使交易者如实报告估值和预算成为占优策略，并削弱区块构建者通过交易排序、夹子攻击或注入虚假出价获利的能力。
原本可能被 MEV 捕获的剩余价值，将重新分配给流动性提供者、交易者、流动性池或底层链验证者，减少构建者优势对生态价值分配的影响。
#LayerZero #MEV #DeFi #AMM
114
ලිපිය
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
Intent-Based Architecture is Fixing UX, But What Is It Doing to Market Structure?We’ve all heard the narrative over the past year: Intents are the ultimate endgame for Web3 UX. You sign a message declaring what outcome you want, and off-chain solvers handle the routing, gas, and execution behind the scenes.
For the average user, it feels like magic. No more stuck transactions, no more manual multi-step bridging, and no need to micromanage gas fees across six different chains.
But if you look closely at how order flow is actually settling behind the curtain, a quiet trade-off is taking place that isn't getting nearly enough coverage.
When you route transactions through off-chain solvers rather than an open public mempool, you aren't eliminating MEV—you’re just shifting where it happens.
1. The "Dark Pool" Parallel
In traditional finance, dark pools were created to execute large orders without moving public order books. Over time, however, they led to market fragmentation where retail orders got internalized off-exchange while toxic flow was dumped onto lit venues. Intent-based architectures run a very similar risk: if solver networks become concentrated, price discovery starts moving off-chain into private auction spaces.
2. Capital Requirements & Solver Oligopolies
Running a competitive solver isn't cheap. It requires massive cross-chain liquidity, sophisticated inventory management, and ultra-low-latency infrastructure. Because of these barrier costs, the pool of winning solvers in any major protocol naturally trends toward a small cluster of well-capitalized market makers. When a handful of entities win 80%+ of execution bids, "optimal routing" is effectively defined by whoever holds the monopoly on liquidity.
3. Convenience vs. Execution Fairness
Hiding technical complexity from the end user is essential for mainstream adoption. But convenience shouldn't blind us to execution quality. If a solver executes your trade slightly worse than optimal market rate and absorbs the difference as margin, the user still gets a "smooth" experience—they just pay an invisible fee for it.
The Big Picture
Intent abstraction is undoubtedly one of the best UX upgrades Web3 has seen in years. But as traders, analysts, and builders, we need to track how these solver auctions mature.
The real test for the next phase of DeFi isn't just making transactions seamless—it's ensuring that solver competition stays decentralized enough so that execution value flows back to the user, rather than getting swallowed by off-chain intermediaries.
Keep an eye on solver auction designs, batch auction mechanics, and programmable privacy primitives over the coming months. That is where the real infrastructure battle is happening.
#defi #Web3 #CryptoAnalysis #MEV
Intent-Based Architecture is Fixing UX, But What Is It Doing to Market Structure?
We’ve all heard the narrative over the past year: Intents are the ultimate endgame for Web3 UX. You sign a message declaring what outcome you want, and off-chain solvers handle the routing, gas, and execution behind the scenes.
For the average user, it feels like magic. No more stuck transactions, no more manual multi-step bridging, and no need to micromanage gas fees across six different chains.
But if you look closely at how order flow is actually settling behind the curtain, a quiet trade-off is taking place that isn't getting nearly enough coverage.
When you route transactions through off-chain solvers rather than an open public mempool, you aren't eliminating MEV—you’re just shifting where it happens.
1. The "Dark Pool" Parallel
In traditional finance, dark pools were created to execute large orders without moving public order books. Over time, however, they led to market fragmentation where retail orders got internalized off-exchange while toxic flow was dumped onto lit venues. Intent-based architectures run a very similar risk: if solver networks become concentrated, price discovery starts moving off-chain into private auction spaces.
2. Capital Requirements & Solver Oligopolies
Running a competitive solver isn't cheap. It requires massive cross-chain liquidity, sophisticated inventory management, and ultra-low-latency infrastructure. Because of these barrier costs, the pool of winning solvers in any major protocol naturally trends toward a small cluster of well-capitalized market makers. When a handful of entities win 80%+ of execution bids, "optimal routing" is effectively defined by whoever holds the monopoly on liquidity.
3. Convenience vs. Execution Fairness
Hiding technical complexity from the end user is essential for mainstream adoption. But convenience shouldn't blind us to execution quality. If a solver executes your trade slightly worse than optimal market rate and absorbs the difference as margin, the user still gets a "smooth" experience—they just pay an invisible fee for it.
The Big Picture
Intent abstraction is undoubtedly one of the best UX upgrades Web3 has seen in years. But as traders, analysts, and builders, we need to track how these solver auctions mature.
The real test for the next phase of DeFi isn't just making transactions seamless—it's ensuring that solver competition stays decentralized enough so that execution value flows back to the user, rather than getting swallowed by off-chain intermediaries.
Keep an eye on solver auction designs, batch auction mechanics, and programmable privacy primitives over the coming months. That is where the real infrastructure battle is happening.
#defi #Web3 #CryptoAnalysis #MEV
For the average user, it feels like magic. No more stuck transactions, no more manual multi-step bridging, and no need to micromanage gas fees across six different chains.
But if you look closely at how order flow is actually settling behind the curtain, a quiet trade-off is taking place that isn't getting nearly enough coverage.
When you route transactions through off-chain solvers rather than an open public mempool, you aren't eliminating MEV—you’re just shifting where it happens.
1. The "Dark Pool" Parallel
In traditional finance, dark pools were created to execute large orders without moving public order books. Over time, however, they led to market fragmentation where retail orders got internalized off-exchange while toxic flow was dumped onto lit venues. Intent-based architectures run a very similar risk: if solver networks become concentrated, price discovery starts moving off-chain into private auction spaces.
2. Capital Requirements & Solver Oligopolies
Running a competitive solver isn't cheap. It requires massive cross-chain liquidity, sophisticated inventory management, and ultra-low-latency infrastructure. Because of these barrier costs, the pool of winning solvers in any major protocol naturally trends toward a small cluster of well-capitalized market makers. When a handful of entities win 80%+ of execution bids, "optimal routing" is effectively defined by whoever holds the monopoly on liquidity.
3. Convenience vs. Execution Fairness
Hiding technical complexity from the end user is essential for mainstream adoption. But convenience shouldn't blind us to execution quality. If a solver executes your trade slightly worse than optimal market rate and absorbs the difference as margin, the user still gets a "smooth" experience—they just pay an invisible fee for it.
The Big Picture
Intent abstraction is undoubtedly one of the best UX upgrades Web3 has seen in years. But as traders, analysts, and builders, we need to track how these solver auctions mature.
The real test for the next phase of DeFi isn't just making transactions seamless—it's ensuring that solver competition stays decentralized enough so that execution value flows back to the user, rather than getting swallowed by off-chain intermediaries.
Keep an eye on solver auction designs, batch auction mechanics, and programmable privacy primitives over the coming months. That is where the real infrastructure battle is happening.
#defi #Web3 #CryptoAnalysis #MEV
1
302
·
--
JaredfromSubway.eth 运营的三明治攻击机器人自 2023 年 3 月以来累计提取 117007 枚 ETH，按当前价格计算约合 2.95 亿美元。ETH 在 Binance 现报约 2455.8 美元，24 小时涨幅 0.65%。
该机器人在 2026 年 6 月遭遇反噬。匿名攻击者部署 66 个仿冒代币合约，利用其自动交易逻辑盗走至少 750 万美元 ETH 和稳定币，资金已转入 Tornado Cash，尚未追回。
三明治攻击属于 MEV 的典型形式：机器人监测公开内存池中的大额交易，提前买入并在价格推高后卖出，从交易价差中提取收益。链上数据显示，相关区块构建仍高度集中，Titan 构建器独立组装 50.3% 的区块，三家监管中继合计转发约 85% 至 88% 的相关区块。
仅作市场观察，不构成投资建议。
#ETH #MEV #链上安全
JaredfromSubway.eth 运营的三明治攻击机器人自 2023 年 3 月以来累计提取 117007 枚 ETH，按当前价格计算约合 2.95 亿美元。ETH 在 Binance 现报约 2455.8 美元，24 小时涨幅 0.65%。
该机器人在 2026 年 6 月遭遇反噬。匿名攻击者部署 66 个仿冒代币合约，利用其自动交易逻辑盗走至少 750 万美元 ETH 和稳定币，资金已转入 Tornado Cash，尚未追回。
三明治攻击属于 MEV 的典型形式：机器人监测公开内存池中的大额交易，提前买入并在价格推高后卖出，从交易价差中提取收益。链上数据显示，相关区块构建仍高度集中，Titan 构建器独立组装 50.3% 的区块，三家监管中继合计转发约 85% 至 88% 的相关区块。
仅作市场观察，不构成投资建议。
#ETH #MEV #链上安全
该机器人在 2026 年 6 月遭遇反噬。匿名攻击者部署 66 个仿冒代币合约，利用其自动交易逻辑盗走至少 750 万美元 ETH 和稳定币，资金已转入 Tornado Cash，尚未追回。
三明治攻击属于 MEV 的典型形式：机器人监测公开内存池中的大额交易，提前买入并在价格推高后卖出，从交易价差中提取收益。链上数据显示，相关区块构建仍高度集中，Titan 构建器独立组装 50.3% 的区块，三家监管中继合计转发约 85% 至 88% 的相关区块。
仅作市场观察，不构成投资建议。
#ETH #MEV #链上安全
50
·
--
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
已去除广告、来源和外链，优化为以下推文格式：
🚨 JaredfromSubway.eth 三明治攻击机器人累计提取约 2.95 亿美元 ETH（117,007 ETH），但在 6 月被反向攻击盗走至少 750 万美元。
攻击者部署 66 个仿冒代币合约，利用该机器人自动交易逻辑得手，资金已转入 Tornado Cash，尚未追回。
背景：三明治攻击属于 MEV。机器人监测以太坊公开内存池中的大额交易，抢先买入，待价格推高后卖出赚取价差。
MEV-Boost 集中化仍明显：relay.ultrasound.money、Titan Relay、bloXroute 等中继 24 小时内转发约 85%-88% 相关区块；Titan 构建器独立组装 50.3% 区块。
三明治攻击月度提取额走势：从 2024 年末约 1000 万美元降至 2025 年 10 月约 250 万美元。
#Ethereum #MEV #Crypto
已去除广告、来源和外链，优化为以下推文格式：
🚨 JaredfromSubway.eth 三明治攻击机器人累计提取约 2.95 亿美元 ETH（117,007 ETH），但在 6 月被反向攻击盗走至少 750 万美元。
攻击者部署 66 个仿冒代币合约，利用该机器人自动交易逻辑得手，资金已转入 Tornado Cash，尚未追回。
背景：三明治攻击属于 MEV。机器人监测以太坊公开内存池中的大额交易，抢先买入，待价格推高后卖出赚取价差。
MEV-Boost 集中化仍明显：relay.ultrasound.money、Titan Relay、bloXroute 等中继 24 小时内转发约 85%-88% 相关区块；Titan 构建器独立组装 50.3% 区块。
三明治攻击月度提取额走势：从 2024 年末约 1000 万美元降至 2025 年 10 月约 250 万美元。
#Ethereum #MEV #Crypto
🚨 JaredfromSubway.eth 三明治攻击机器人累计提取约 2.95 亿美元 ETH（117,007 ETH），但在 6 月被反向攻击盗走至少 750 万美元。
攻击者部署 66 个仿冒代币合约，利用该机器人自动交易逻辑得手，资金已转入 Tornado Cash，尚未追回。
背景：三明治攻击属于 MEV。机器人监测以太坊公开内存池中的大额交易，抢先买入，待价格推高后卖出赚取价差。
MEV-Boost 集中化仍明显：relay.ultrasound.money、Titan Relay、bloXroute 等中继 24 小时内转发约 85%-88% 相关区块；Titan 构建器独立组装 50.3% 区块。
三明治攻击月度提取额走势：从 2024 年末约 1000 万美元降至 2025 年 10 月约 250 万美元。
#Ethereum #MEV #Crypto
176
·
--
ක්රිප්ටෝ වල MEV යනු වඩාත් අවංක සංඥාවයි — සහ AI එය තව දුරටත් වර්ධනය කිරීමට සූදානම් වෙයි
බොහෝ වෙළෙන්දෝ MEV (maximal extractable value) ගැන කිසිවිටෙක සිතන්නේ නැහැ. නමුත් ඔවුන් කළ යුතුයි.
සෑම වාරයකම ගනුදෙනුවක් mempool තුළ රැඳී සිටින විට, සවිස්තරාත්මක ක්රියාකාරීන් — බොට්, සෙවුම්කරුවන්, validator වරු — නැවත පෙළගැස්ම (reordering), front-running, නැතහොත් sandwiching කරමින් වටිනාකම ලබා ගැනීමට තරඟ කරයි. MEV යනු දෝෂයක් නොවේ. එය වෙළඳපල ව්යුහයේ (market structure) සංඥාවකි: සැබෑ ආර්ථික ක්රියාකාරකම ජීවත් වන තැන ඔබට කියයි.
මේ වනවිට MEV ලබාගැනීම ප්රමුඛ වන්නේ ඉතා සංකීර්ණ අල්ගොරිතම කිහිපයකින්. නමුත් අපි නව අදියරකට පිවිසෙමින් සිටිනවා. තථ්ය කාලීන හේතු සොයා බැලීමේ හැකියාව ඇති AI agent වරු බ්ලොක් නිර්මාණයට හා ගනුදෙනු පෙළගැස්මට සෘජුවම සහභාගී වීමට පටන් ගනිමින් සිටී. මෙය මුළුමනින්ම ක්රීඩාව වෙනස් කරයි.
$ETH මත, proposer-builder වෙන් කිරීම වඩාත් සංකීර්ණ MEV උපාය මාර්ග සඳහා දොර ඇරියා. $SOL මත, සාම්ප්රදායික mempool එකක් නොමැති වීම වෙනස් ලෙස ලබාගත හැකි වටිනාකම් පරිසරයක් නිර්මාණය කරයි — ප්රමාදය (latency) සහ validator ආසන්නතාව (proximity) එහි වාසිය වේ. $BNB මත, BSC හි බ්ලොක් කාලය සහ validator ව්යුහය ඒකීය arbitrage මං තීරු නිර්මාණය කරයි.
වෙළෙන්දෙක් ලෙස ඔබට මෙයින් අදහස් වන්නේ:
— විශාල DEX swap විශේෂයෙන් අවදානමට ලක් වේ; orders වෙන් කිරීම exposure අඩු කරයි
— අඩු liquidity ඇති pool වල ඉහළ-පරිමාව යුගල (pairs) MEV අවදානම විශාල ලෙස වැඩි කරයි
— On-chain slippage වල අසාමාන්යතා බොහෝවිට MEV වේ; හදිසි වෙළඳපල ශබ්දය නොවේ
MEV සාධාරණව විසඳන chain වල් දිගුකාලීනව වැඩිම සංකීර්ණ ප්රාග්ධනය (capital) ආකර්ෂණය කරනු ඇත.
වටිනාකම කොතැනින් ලබාගන්නවාද තේරුම් ගන්නවා යනු සැබෑ liquidity ප්රවාහය කොතැනද තේරුම් ගැනීමයි.
#MEV #DeFi #CryptoTrading #Web3Infrastructure #BlockchainDevelopment
ක්රිප්ටෝ වල MEV යනු වඩාත් අවංක සංඥාවයි — සහ AI එය තව දුරටත් වර්ධනය කිරීමට සූදානම් වෙයි
බොහෝ වෙළෙන්දෝ MEV (maximal extractable value) ගැන කිසිවිටෙක සිතන්නේ නැහැ. නමුත් ඔවුන් කළ යුතුයි.
සෑම වාරයකම ගනුදෙනුවක් mempool තුළ රැඳී සිටින විට, සවිස්තරාත්මක ක්රියාකාරීන් — බොට්, සෙවුම්කරුවන්, validator වරු — නැවත පෙළගැස්ම (reordering), front-running, නැතහොත් sandwiching කරමින් වටිනාකම ලබා ගැනීමට තරඟ කරයි. MEV යනු දෝෂයක් නොවේ. එය වෙළඳපල ව්යුහයේ (market structure) සංඥාවකි: සැබෑ ආර්ථික ක්රියාකාරකම ජීවත් වන තැන ඔබට කියයි.
මේ වනවිට MEV ලබාගැනීම ප්රමුඛ වන්නේ ඉතා සංකීර්ණ අල්ගොරිතම කිහිපයකින්. නමුත් අපි නව අදියරකට පිවිසෙමින් සිටිනවා. තථ්ය කාලීන හේතු සොයා බැලීමේ හැකියාව ඇති AI agent වරු බ්ලොක් නිර්මාණයට හා ගනුදෙනු පෙළගැස්මට සෘජුවම සහභාගී වීමට පටන් ගනිමින් සිටී. මෙය මුළුමනින්ම ක්රීඩාව වෙනස් කරයි.
$ETH මත, proposer-builder වෙන් කිරීම වඩාත් සංකීර්ණ MEV උපාය මාර්ග සඳහා දොර ඇරියා. $SOL මත, සාම්ප්රදායික mempool එකක් නොමැති වීම වෙනස් ලෙස ලබාගත හැකි වටිනාකම් පරිසරයක් නිර්මාණය කරයි — ප්රමාදය (latency) සහ validator ආසන්නතාව (proximity) එහි වාසිය වේ. $BNB මත, BSC හි බ්ලොක් කාලය සහ validator ව්යුහය ඒකීය arbitrage මං තීරු නිර්මාණය කරයි.
වෙළෙන්දෙක් ලෙස ඔබට මෙයින් අදහස් වන්නේ:
— විශාල DEX swap විශේෂයෙන් අවදානමට ලක් වේ; orders වෙන් කිරීම exposure අඩු කරයි
— අඩු liquidity ඇති pool වල ඉහළ-පරිමාව යුගල (pairs) MEV අවදානම විශාල ලෙස වැඩි කරයි
— On-chain slippage වල අසාමාන්යතා බොහෝවිට MEV වේ; හදිසි වෙළඳපල ශබ්දය නොවේ
MEV සාධාරණව විසඳන chain වල් දිගුකාලීනව වැඩිම සංකීර්ණ ප්රාග්ධනය (capital) ආකර්ෂණය කරනු ඇත.
වටිනාකම කොතැනින් ලබාගන්නවාද තේරුම් ගන්නවා යනු සැබෑ liquidity ප්රවාහය කොතැනද තේරුම් ගැනීමයි.
#MEV #DeFi #CryptoTrading #Web3Infrastructure #BlockchainDevelopment
බොහෝ වෙළෙන්දෝ MEV (maximal extractable value) ගැන කිසිවිටෙක සිතන්නේ නැහැ. නමුත් ඔවුන් කළ යුතුයි.
සෑම වාරයකම ගනුදෙනුවක් mempool තුළ රැඳී සිටින විට, සවිස්තරාත්මක ක්රියාකාරීන් — බොට්, සෙවුම්කරුවන්, validator වරු — නැවත පෙළගැස්ම (reordering), front-running, නැතහොත් sandwiching කරමින් වටිනාකම ලබා ගැනීමට තරඟ කරයි. MEV යනු දෝෂයක් නොවේ. එය වෙළඳපල ව්යුහයේ (market structure) සංඥාවකි: සැබෑ ආර්ථික ක්රියාකාරකම ජීවත් වන තැන ඔබට කියයි.
මේ වනවිට MEV ලබාගැනීම ප්රමුඛ වන්නේ ඉතා සංකීර්ණ අල්ගොරිතම කිහිපයකින්. නමුත් අපි නව අදියරකට පිවිසෙමින් සිටිනවා. තථ්ය කාලීන හේතු සොයා බැලීමේ හැකියාව ඇති AI agent වරු බ්ලොක් නිර්මාණයට හා ගනුදෙනු පෙළගැස්මට සෘජුවම සහභාගී වීමට පටන් ගනිමින් සිටී. මෙය මුළුමනින්ම ක්රීඩාව වෙනස් කරයි.
$ETH මත, proposer-builder වෙන් කිරීම වඩාත් සංකීර්ණ MEV උපාය මාර්ග සඳහා දොර ඇරියා. $SOL මත, සාම්ප්රදායික mempool එකක් නොමැති වීම වෙනස් ලෙස ලබාගත හැකි වටිනාකම් පරිසරයක් නිර්මාණය කරයි — ප්රමාදය (latency) සහ validator ආසන්නතාව (proximity) එහි වාසිය වේ. $BNB මත, BSC හි බ්ලොක් කාලය සහ validator ව්යුහය ඒකීය arbitrage මං තීරු නිර්මාණය කරයි.
වෙළෙන්දෙක් ලෙස ඔබට මෙයින් අදහස් වන්නේ:
— විශාල DEX swap විශේෂයෙන් අවදානමට ලක් වේ; orders වෙන් කිරීම exposure අඩු කරයි
— අඩු liquidity ඇති pool වල ඉහළ-පරිමාව යුගල (pairs) MEV අවදානම විශාල ලෙස වැඩි කරයි
— On-chain slippage වල අසාමාන්යතා බොහෝවිට MEV වේ; හදිසි වෙළඳපල ශබ්දය නොවේ
MEV සාධාරණව විසඳන chain වල් දිගුකාලීනව වැඩිම සංකීර්ණ ප්රාග්ධනය (capital) ආකර්ෂණය කරනු ඇත.
වටිනාකම කොතැනින් ලබාගන්නවාද තේරුම් ගන්නවා යනු සැබෑ liquidity ප්රවාහය කොතැනද තේරුම් ගැනීමයි.
#MEV #DeFi #CryptoTrading #Web3Infrastructure #BlockchainDevelopment
142
·
--
උසබ තත්ත්වය
கிரிப்டோவில் “Front-Running” (முன்கூட்டிய வர்த்தகம்) என்றால் என்ன?
ஒருவர் நிலுவையில் இருக்கும் (pending) ஒரு பரிவர்த்தனையை பார்த்து, அது உறுதிசெய்யப்படும் முன்னரே அதற்கு முன் வர்த்தகம் செய்ய முயலும் போது front-running நடைபெறும்.
அந்த முதன்மை பரிவர்த்தனை உருவாக்கக்கூடிய விலை மாற்றத்திலிருந்து லாபம் பெறுவதே பொதுவான நோக்கம்.
இது MEV மற்றும் பரிவர்த்தனை வரிசைப்படுத்தலுடன் நெருக்கமாக தொடர்புடையது.
#FrontRunning #MEV #crypto #defi
கிரிப்டோவில் “Front-Running” (முன்கூட்டிய வர்த்தகம்) என்றால் என்ன?
ஒருவர் நிலுவையில் இருக்கும் (pending) ஒரு பரிவர்த்தனையை பார்த்து, அது உறுதிசெய்யப்படும் முன்னரே அதற்கு முன் வர்த்தகம் செய்ய முயலும் போது front-running நடைபெறும்.
அந்த முதன்மை பரிவர்த்தனை உருவாக்கக்கூடிய விலை மாற்றத்திலிருந்து லாபம் பெறுவதே பொதுவான நோக்கம்.
இது MEV மற்றும் பரிவர்த்தனை வரிசைப்படுத்தலுடன் நெருக்கமாக தொடர்புடையது.
#FrontRunning #MEV #crypto #defi
ஒருவர் நிலுவையில் இருக்கும் (pending) ஒரு பரிவர்த்தனையை பார்த்து, அது உறுதிசெய்யப்படும் முன்னரே அதற்கு முன் வர்த்தகம் செய்ய முயலும் போது front-running நடைபெறும்.
அந்த முதன்மை பரிவர்த்தனை உருவாக்கக்கூடிய விலை மாற்றத்திலிருந்து லாபம் பெறுவதே பொதுவான நோக்கம்.
இது MEV மற்றும் பரிவர்த்தனை வரிசைப்படுத்தலுடன் நெருக்கமாக தொடர்புடையது.
#FrontRunning #MEV #crypto #defi
127
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
#COW Protocol is a decentralized trading protocol designed to improve DeFi swaps through MEV protection and batch auctions. It helps users find better execution prices by matching trades directly when possible, reducing unnecessary slippage and protecting traders from common MEV strategies. The COW token supports governance and ecosystem participation, making CoW Protocol an important player in decentralized, user-focused trading.
#COW #CoWProtocol #DeFi #Crypto #DEX #MEV
$COW
{future}(COWUSDT)
$COMP
{future}(COMPUSDT)
$C
{future}(CUSDT)
#COW Protocol is a decentralized trading protocol designed to improve DeFi swaps through MEV protection and batch auctions. It helps users find better execution prices by matching trades directly when possible, reducing unnecessary slippage and protecting traders from common MEV strategies. The COW token supports governance and ecosystem participation, making CoW Protocol an important player in decentralized, user-focused trading.
#COW #CoWProtocol #DeFi #Crypto #DEX #MEV
$COW
$COMP
$C
#COW #CoWProtocol #DeFi #Crypto #DEX #MEV
$COW
$COMP
$C
225
·
--
උසබ තත්ත්වය
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
What is MEV (Maximal Extractable Value)?
MEV is the profit that can be made by controlling the order of transactions on a blockchain.
Bots and validators can sometimes reorder, insert or exclude transactions to capture extra value.
It can significantly affect how trades are executed in DeFi.
#MEV #DeFi #Crypto #blockchain $SOL
{future}(SOLUSDT)
What is MEV (Maximal Extractable Value)?
MEV is the profit that can be made by controlling the order of transactions on a blockchain.
Bots and validators can sometimes reorder, insert or exclude transactions to capture extra value.
It can significantly affect how trades are executed in DeFi.
#MEV #DeFi #Crypto #blockchain $SOL
MEV is the profit that can be made by controlling the order of transactions on a blockchain.
Bots and validators can sometimes reorder, insert or exclude transactions to capture extra value.
It can significantly affect how trades are executed in DeFi.
#MEV #DeFi #Crypto #blockchain $SOL
161
·
--
උසබ තත්ත්වය
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
Transparency was supposed to be crypto's greatest feature. It became its most exploited vulnerability.@GeniusOfficial
For years, the market rewarded observers. Wallet trackers, on-chain analysts, smart money followers entire trading cultures built around the assumption that seeing clearly was the same as competing effectively. Visibility was treated as edge.
But that assumption contained a hidden flaw.#genius
In a fully transparent market, information equalizes faster than it can be monetized. The moment a whale moves, the signal propagates. The moment a signal propagates, it gets front-run, copied, or priced in. Observation without execution is just latency with a better dashboard.
This is where the nature of competition quietly shifts.#MEV
The real structural advantage is no longer upstream it is not in knowing what capital is doing. It is in controlling how capital moves once you decide to act. Routing quality, MEV protection, liquidity access, execution without footprint these are becoming the actual determinants of alpha in adversarial, fragmented markets.
Genius Terminal sits precisely at this inflection point. Not as a visibility tool, but as execution infrastructure built for an environment where revealing your intent is the same as surrendering your position.
The implication extends beyond any single platform.#GeniusTerminal
Markets evolve toward making their most exploitable advantages obsolete. Information edges compress. Behavioral edges get modeled. What survives is structural the ability to operate efficiently inside a system that is actively working against you.
The question was never just "what are the whales doing?"
It was always "why do some of them keep winning even after everyone is watching?"
@GeniusOfficial #genius $GENIUS
{spot}(GENIUSUSDT)
Transparency was supposed to be crypto's greatest feature. It became its most exploited vulnerability.@GeniusOfficial
For years, the market rewarded observers. Wallet trackers, on-chain analysts, smart money followers entire trading cultures built around the assumption that seeing clearly was the same as competing effectively. Visibility was treated as edge.
But that assumption contained a hidden flaw.#genius
In a fully transparent market, information equalizes faster than it can be monetized. The moment a whale moves, the signal propagates. The moment a signal propagates, it gets front-run, copied, or priced in. Observation without execution is just latency with a better dashboard.
This is where the nature of competition quietly shifts.#MEV
The real structural advantage is no longer upstream it is not in knowing what capital is doing. It is in controlling how capital moves once you decide to act. Routing quality, MEV protection, liquidity access, execution without footprint these are becoming the actual determinants of alpha in adversarial, fragmented markets.
Genius Terminal sits precisely at this inflection point. Not as a visibility tool, but as execution infrastructure built for an environment where revealing your intent is the same as surrendering your position.
The implication extends beyond any single platform.#GeniusTerminal
Markets evolve toward making their most exploitable advantages obsolete. Information edges compress. Behavioral edges get modeled. What survives is structural the ability to operate efficiently inside a system that is actively working against you.
The question was never just "what are the whales doing?"
It was always "why do some of them keep winning even after everyone is watching?"
@GeniusOfficial #genius $GENIUS
For years, the market rewarded observers. Wallet trackers, on-chain analysts, smart money followers entire trading cultures built around the assumption that seeing clearly was the same as competing effectively. Visibility was treated as edge.
But that assumption contained a hidden flaw.#genius
In a fully transparent market, information equalizes faster than it can be monetized. The moment a whale moves, the signal propagates. The moment a signal propagates, it gets front-run, copied, or priced in. Observation without execution is just latency with a better dashboard.
This is where the nature of competition quietly shifts.#MEV
The real structural advantage is no longer upstream it is not in knowing what capital is doing. It is in controlling how capital moves once you decide to act. Routing quality, MEV protection, liquidity access, execution without footprint these are becoming the actual determinants of alpha in adversarial, fragmented markets.
Genius Terminal sits precisely at this inflection point. Not as a visibility tool, but as execution infrastructure built for an environment where revealing your intent is the same as surrendering your position.
The implication extends beyond any single platform.#GeniusTerminal
Markets evolve toward making their most exploitable advantages obsolete. Information edges compress. Behavioral edges get modeled. What survives is structural the ability to operate efficiently inside a system that is actively working against you.
The question was never just "what are the whales doing?"
It was always "why do some of them keep winning even after everyone is watching?"
@GeniusOfficial #genius $GENIUS
4
8
152
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
СВЕРХДОХОД ЗА ТВОЙ СЧЕТ: КАК ВАЛИДАТОРЫ SOLANA ВОРУЮТ ЦЕНТЫ С КАЖДОЙ ТВОЕЙ СДЕЛКИ 🤖🧬
Ты торгуешь на Solana через Phantom или Telegram-ботов, ставишь максимальный приоритет комиссии (Priority Fee), чтобы ордер прошел быстрее, но всё равно покупаешь актив по худшей цене. Знакомься, это MEV-инфраструктура валидаторов (Jito).
• Как тебя грабят: Валидаторы сети видят твой ордер в очереди. Они используют специальный софт, чтобы переставить свои транзакции прямо перед твоей и сразу после нее.
• Итог: Они искусственно завышают цену для тебя на долю процента, забирают эту разницу себе в карман и мгновенно выходят. Это легальный грабеж внутри блокчейна, о котором молчат блогеры.
👇 Открывай виджет SOL. Знал, что блокчейн-технологии тоже могут работать против тебя?
#Solana $SOL #MEV #Jito #CryptoFREEMEN
СВЕРХДОХОД ЗА ТВОЙ СЧЕТ: КАК ВАЛИДАТОРЫ SOLANA ВОРУЮТ ЦЕНТЫ С КАЖДОЙ ТВОЕЙ СДЕЛКИ 🤖🧬
Ты торгуешь на Solana через Phantom или Telegram-ботов, ставишь максимальный приоритет комиссии (Priority Fee), чтобы ордер прошел быстрее, но всё равно покупаешь актив по худшей цене. Знакомься, это MEV-инфраструктура валидаторов (Jito).
• Как тебя грабят: Валидаторы сети видят твой ордер в очереди. Они используют специальный софт, чтобы переставить свои транзакции прямо перед твоей и сразу после нее.
• Итог: Они искусственно завышают цену для тебя на долю процента, забирают эту разницу себе в карман и мгновенно выходят. Это легальный грабеж внутри блокчейна, о котором молчат блогеры.
👇 Открывай виджет SOL. Знал, что блокчейн-технологии тоже могут работать против тебя?
#Solana $SOL #MEV #Jito #CryptoFREEMEN
Ты торгуешь на Solana через Phantom или Telegram-ботов, ставишь максимальный приоритет комиссии (Priority Fee), чтобы ордер прошел быстрее, но всё равно покупаешь актив по худшей цене. Знакомься, это MEV-инфраструктура валидаторов (Jito).
• Как тебя грабят: Валидаторы сети видят твой ордер в очереди. Они используют специальный софт, чтобы переставить свои транзакции прямо перед твоей и сразу после нее.
• Итог: Они искусственно завышают цену для тебя на долю процента, забирают эту разницу себе в карман и мгновенно выходят. Это легальный грабеж внутри блокчейна, о котором молчат блогеры.
👇 Открывай виджет SOL. Знал, что блокчейн-технологии тоже могут работать против тебя?
#Solana $SOL #MEV #Jito #CryptoFREEMEN
132
·
--
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
以太坊上最出名的夹子机器人，昨天被人反夹了750万美金。
jaredfromsubway.eth这个名字，混DeFi的应该都听过。两年多来，以太坊上70%的夹子攻击都是它干的。连Vitalik换2美金的币都被它夹过。它靠算法自动监控pending交易，在你前面买、在你后面卖，吃中间的价差。简单粗暴，但极其赚钱。
结果昨天，这个吃肉最多的机器人，自己变成了猎物。
黑客花了好几周时间，部署了66个假代币合约和假流动性池。这些假合约模仿WETH、USDC、USDT的交易模式，制造出看起来有利可图的交易机会。jaredfromsubway的机器人看到有肉吃，二话不说就冲了。但它不知道的是，每次"盈利交易"都在让它授权一个恶意合约。最后一笔交易，黑客直接调用所有后门，把机器人钱包里的ETH、USDC、USDT全部转走了。
这招有个名字叫"反向MEV蜜罐"，专门针对机器人的决策逻辑量身定制。不是攻破合约，不是钓鱼签名，而是利用机器人"只看利润不看对手"的弱点。
我反复在想一个问题：MEV机器人靠算法自动判断交易是否值得执行，但算法分辨不出对手是真实用户还是猎人。当你的商业模式建立在"夹别人"的基础上，你的软肋其实很明显——只要伪造出看起来可以夹的目标，机器人就会自己走进陷阱。
这跟普通散户有什么关系？关系大了。它说明链上环境比你想象的危险得多。你以为被夹只是小散的烦恼？连吃肉最多的机器人都会被吃。在DeFi里，每一笔交易的对面都可能是陷阱。
更讽刺的是，同一天华尔街日报还曝光了Polymarket。调查发现TikTok和Instagram上大量"秒赚"视频是假的，有的是付费创作者做的，有的盈利截图直接伪造。Polymarket还雇了一家叫Virality的营销公司专门针对美国用户推广。一个预测市场平台，自己都在造假，你还信什么？
两个事情指向同一个现实：链上世界没有安全区。从MEV机器人到预测平台，从算法到营销，每个环节都有人在设局。
你以为你在玩游戏，其实你就是游戏本身。
$ETH #MEV #DeFi #Polymarket #币安广场
以太坊上最出名的夹子机器人，昨天被人反夹了750万美金。
jaredfromsubway.eth这个名字，混DeFi的应该都听过。两年多来，以太坊上70%的夹子攻击都是它干的。连Vitalik换2美金的币都被它夹过。它靠算法自动监控pending交易，在你前面买、在你后面卖，吃中间的价差。简单粗暴，但极其赚钱。
结果昨天，这个吃肉最多的机器人，自己变成了猎物。
黑客花了好几周时间，部署了66个假代币合约和假流动性池。这些假合约模仿WETH、USDC、USDT的交易模式，制造出看起来有利可图的交易机会。jaredfromsubway的机器人看到有肉吃，二话不说就冲了。但它不知道的是，每次"盈利交易"都在让它授权一个恶意合约。最后一笔交易，黑客直接调用所有后门，把机器人钱包里的ETH、USDC、USDT全部转走了。
这招有个名字叫"反向MEV蜜罐"，专门针对机器人的决策逻辑量身定制。不是攻破合约，不是钓鱼签名，而是利用机器人"只看利润不看对手"的弱点。
我反复在想一个问题：MEV机器人靠算法自动判断交易是否值得执行，但算法分辨不出对手是真实用户还是猎人。当你的商业模式建立在"夹别人"的基础上，你的软肋其实很明显——只要伪造出看起来可以夹的目标，机器人就会自己走进陷阱。
这跟普通散户有什么关系？关系大了。它说明链上环境比你想象的危险得多。你以为被夹只是小散的烦恼？连吃肉最多的机器人都会被吃。在DeFi里，每一笔交易的对面都可能是陷阱。
更讽刺的是，同一天华尔街日报还曝光了Polymarket。调查发现TikTok和Instagram上大量"秒赚"视频是假的，有的是付费创作者做的，有的盈利截图直接伪造。Polymarket还雇了一家叫Virality的营销公司专门针对美国用户推广。一个预测市场平台，自己都在造假，你还信什么？
两个事情指向同一个现实：链上世界没有安全区。从MEV机器人到预测平台，从算法到营销，每个环节都有人在设局。
你以为你在玩游戏，其实你就是游戏本身。
$ETH #MEV #DeFi #Polymarket #币安广场
jaredfromsubway.eth这个名字，混DeFi的应该都听过。两年多来，以太坊上70%的夹子攻击都是它干的。连Vitalik换2美金的币都被它夹过。它靠算法自动监控pending交易，在你前面买、在你后面卖，吃中间的价差。简单粗暴，但极其赚钱。
结果昨天，这个吃肉最多的机器人，自己变成了猎物。
黑客花了好几周时间，部署了66个假代币合约和假流动性池。这些假合约模仿WETH、USDC、USDT的交易模式，制造出看起来有利可图的交易机会。jaredfromsubway的机器人看到有肉吃，二话不说就冲了。但它不知道的是，每次"盈利交易"都在让它授权一个恶意合约。最后一笔交易，黑客直接调用所有后门，把机器人钱包里的ETH、USDC、USDT全部转走了。
这招有个名字叫"反向MEV蜜罐"，专门针对机器人的决策逻辑量身定制。不是攻破合约，不是钓鱼签名，而是利用机器人"只看利润不看对手"的弱点。
我反复在想一个问题：MEV机器人靠算法自动判断交易是否值得执行，但算法分辨不出对手是真实用户还是猎人。当你的商业模式建立在"夹别人"的基础上，你的软肋其实很明显——只要伪造出看起来可以夹的目标，机器人就会自己走进陷阱。
这跟普通散户有什么关系？关系大了。它说明链上环境比你想象的危险得多。你以为被夹只是小散的烦恼？连吃肉最多的机器人都会被吃。在DeFi里，每一笔交易的对面都可能是陷阱。
更讽刺的是，同一天华尔街日报还曝光了Polymarket。调查发现TikTok和Instagram上大量"秒赚"视频是假的，有的是付费创作者做的，有的盈利截图直接伪造。Polymarket还雇了一家叫Virality的营销公司专门针对美国用户推广。一个预测市场平台，自己都在造假，你还信什么？
两个事情指向同一个现实：链上世界没有安全区。从MEV机器人到预测平台，从算法到营销，每个环节都有人在设局。
你以为你在玩游戏，其实你就是游戏本身。
$ETH #MEV #DeFi #Polymarket #币安广场
160
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
Một bot MEV từng được xem là cỗ máy in tiền trên Ethereum vừa bị "đánh lừa" mất sạch 7,5 triệu USD chỉ trong vài giờ. Không phải do lỗi cầu nối hay hack hợp đồng thông minh, mà kẻ tấn công đã khai thác chính logic giao dịch của bot JaredFromSubway — đọc vị thuật toán qua các giao dịch thử nghiệm rồi giăng bẫy.
Vụ việc phơi bày một sự thật phũ phàng: bot càng tinh vi, bề mặt tấn công càng lớn. Khi logic giao dịch bị lộ, bot không khác gì tấm bia di động. Đội ngũ vận hành đe dọa hành động pháp lý, nhưng trách nhiệm giữa các lớp DeFi thường rất mơ hồ.
Với trader, đây là hồi chuông cảnh tỉnh về rủi ro của tự động hóa. Không nên đặt toàn bộ niềm tin vào bot, dù nó từng chạy trơn tru. Bảo mật và kiểm tra logic thường xuyên mới là tấm khiên thực sự.
DYOR và quản trị rủi ro.
#Ethereum #MEV #BảoMật #CryptoRisks #DeFi
Một bot MEV từng được xem là cỗ máy in tiền trên Ethereum vừa bị "đánh lừa" mất sạch 7,5 triệu USD chỉ trong vài giờ. Không phải do lỗi cầu nối hay hack hợp đồng thông minh, mà kẻ tấn công đã khai thác chính logic giao dịch của bot JaredFromSubway — đọc vị thuật toán qua các giao dịch thử nghiệm rồi giăng bẫy.
Vụ việc phơi bày một sự thật phũ phàng: bot càng tinh vi, bề mặt tấn công càng lớn. Khi logic giao dịch bị lộ, bot không khác gì tấm bia di động. Đội ngũ vận hành đe dọa hành động pháp lý, nhưng trách nhiệm giữa các lớp DeFi thường rất mơ hồ.
Với trader, đây là hồi chuông cảnh tỉnh về rủi ro của tự động hóa. Không nên đặt toàn bộ niềm tin vào bot, dù nó từng chạy trơn tru. Bảo mật và kiểm tra logic thường xuyên mới là tấm khiên thực sự.
DYOR và quản trị rủi ro.
#Ethereum #MEV #BảoMật #CryptoRisks #DeFi
Vụ việc phơi bày một sự thật phũ phàng: bot càng tinh vi, bề mặt tấn công càng lớn. Khi logic giao dịch bị lộ, bot không khác gì tấm bia di động. Đội ngũ vận hành đe dọa hành động pháp lý, nhưng trách nhiệm giữa các lớp DeFi thường rất mơ hồ.
Với trader, đây là hồi chuông cảnh tỉnh về rủi ro của tự động hóa. Không nên đặt toàn bộ niềm tin vào bot, dù nó từng chạy trơn tru. Bảo mật và kiểm tra logic thường xuyên mới là tấm khiên thực sự.
DYOR và quản trị rủi ro.
#Ethereum #MEV #BảoMật #CryptoRisks #DeFi
50
·
--
"JaredFromSubway" ဟုခေါ်သည့် လူသိများသော Ethereum MEV ဘော့တစ်ခုက စနေ/တနင်္ဂနွေ အတွင်း တိုက်ခိုက်မှုတစ်ခုကြောင့် ဒေါ်လာ ၇.၅ သန်း ဆုံးရှုံးသွားပြီး DeFi တစ်လျှောက် လှုပ်ရှားမှုတွေကို တုန်လှုပ်စေခဲ့သည်။
ဆန်းဒ်ဝစ်ချ် (sandwich) တိုက်ခိုက်မှုနည်းဗျူဟာကို အလွန်တော်တက်အောင် လုပ်ဆောင်နိုင်ခဲ့သည့် ဘော့တစ်ခုဖြစ်သော်လည်း အတုတင် တိုကင်များနှင့် လိမ်လည်ထားသော စမတ်ကန်ထရက်များက ၎င်း၏ လော့ဂျစ် (logic) တွင် အားနည်းချက်တစ်ခုကို ပေါ်ထွက်စေပြီးနောက် အသုံးချခံခဲ့ရသည်။ တိုက်ခိုက်သူက လှည့်ဖြားတတ်သော အခွင့်အရေးများကို တင်ပြခဲ့သဖြင့် တရားဝင် (legitimate) ရန်ပုံငွေများကို စီးထုတ်ရန် သူတို့အား ခွင့်ပြုခဲ့သည်။ လုံခြုံရေးကုမ္ပဏီ Blockaid က ထို exploit (အကန့်အသတ်များကို ဖောက်ထွင်းသည့်လုပ်ရပ်) တွင် သုံးစွဲခွင့် (spending permissions) ကို မှန်ကန်စွာ ပြန်ရုတ်မသိမ်းထားသည့် transaction များ ပါဝင်ကြောင်း အတည်ပြုခဲ့သည်။
on-chain (ကွင်းဆက်ပေါ်) မက်ဆေ့ချ်တစ်ခုတွင် ဘော့ အော်ပရေတာက 48 နာရီအတွင်း 2,150 ETH (~$3.7M) ပြန်ပေးရန် 50% white hat bounty ကို ကမ်းလှမ်းခဲ့သည်။ သို့သော် တိုက်ခိုက်သူက လိမ်လည်ထားသည့် ရန်ပုံငွေများကို Tornado Cash မှတစ်ဆင့် လမ်းကြောင်းဖုံးကွယ်ရန်မှာ အနည်းဆုံး စတင်နေပြီဖြစ်သည်။
DeFi ကုန်သည်များအတွက် အဓိက သိမှတ်ချက်- အလိုအလျောက် ချက်ချင်းလုပ်ဆောင်နိုင်လွန်းတဲ့ နည်းဗျူဟာတွေတောင် စမတ်ကန်ထရက်အန္တရာယ် (risk) ကို သယ်ဆောင်လာနိုင်သည်။ အကျိုးအမြတ်အခွင့်အရေးတွေကို စကင်ဖတ်သည့် MEV ဘော့တွေကို ကိုယ့်ကိုယ်ကိုယ်ပါ ပြန်တိုက်ခိုက်သည့်အဖြစ် အသုံးချနိုင်သည်။ spending permission များကို ခွင့်ပြုမီ တိုကင်ကန်ထရက်တွေကို အမြဲ စစ်ဆေးပါ။
$ETH ပေါ်မှာ MEV protection tool တွေနဲ့ သင် ဘယ်တုန်းက ဆက်သွယ်ခဲ့ဖူးပါသလဲ။ on-chain လုံခြုံရေးအတွက် သင့်ရဲ့ နည်းဗျူဟာက ဘာလဲ?
#MEV #Ethereum #DeFiSecurity #SandwichAttack #Crypto
"JaredFromSubway" ဟုခေါ်သည့် လူသိများသော Ethereum MEV ဘော့တစ်ခုက စနေ/တနင်္ဂနွေ အတွင်း တိုက်ခိုက်မှုတစ်ခုကြောင့် ဒေါ်လာ ၇.၅ သန်း ဆုံးရှုံးသွားပြီး DeFi တစ်လျှောက် လှုပ်ရှားမှုတွေကို တုန်လှုပ်စေခဲ့သည်။
ဆန်းဒ်ဝစ်ချ် (sandwich) တိုက်ခိုက်မှုနည်းဗျူဟာကို အလွန်တော်တက်အောင် လုပ်ဆောင်နိုင်ခဲ့သည့် ဘော့တစ်ခုဖြစ်သော်လည်း အတုတင် တိုကင်များနှင့် လိမ်လည်ထားသော စမတ်ကန်ထရက်များက ၎င်း၏ လော့ဂျစ် (logic) တွင် အားနည်းချက်တစ်ခုကို ပေါ်ထွက်စေပြီးနောက် အသုံးချခံခဲ့ရသည်။ တိုက်ခိုက်သူက လှည့်ဖြားတတ်သော အခွင့်အရေးများကို တင်ပြခဲ့သဖြင့် တရားဝင် (legitimate) ရန်ပုံငွေများကို စီးထုတ်ရန် သူတို့အား ခွင့်ပြုခဲ့သည်။ လုံခြုံရေးကုမ္ပဏီ Blockaid က ထို exploit (အကန့်အသတ်များကို ဖောက်ထွင်းသည့်လုပ်ရပ်) တွင် သုံးစွဲခွင့် (spending permissions) ကို မှန်ကန်စွာ ပြန်ရုတ်မသိမ်းထားသည့် transaction များ ပါဝင်ကြောင်း အတည်ပြုခဲ့သည်။
on-chain (ကွင်းဆက်ပေါ်) မက်ဆေ့ချ်တစ်ခုတွင် ဘော့ အော်ပရေတာက 48 နာရီအတွင်း 2,150 ETH (~$3.7M) ပြန်ပေးရန် 50% white hat bounty ကို ကမ်းလှမ်းခဲ့သည်။ သို့သော် တိုက်ခိုက်သူက လိမ်လည်ထားသည့် ရန်ပုံငွေများကို Tornado Cash မှတစ်ဆင့် လမ်းကြောင်းဖုံးကွယ်ရန်မှာ အနည်းဆုံး စတင်နေပြီဖြစ်သည်။
DeFi ကုန်သည်များအတွက် အဓိက သိမှတ်ချက်- အလိုအလျောက် ချက်ချင်းလုပ်ဆောင်နိုင်လွန်းတဲ့ နည်းဗျူဟာတွေတောင် စမတ်ကန်ထရက်အန္တရာယ် (risk) ကို သယ်ဆောင်လာနိုင်သည်။ အကျိုးအမြတ်အခွင့်အရေးတွေကို စကင်ဖတ်သည့် MEV ဘော့တွေကို ကိုယ့်ကိုယ်ကိုယ်ပါ ပြန်တိုက်ခိုက်သည့်အဖြစ် အသုံးချနိုင်သည်။ spending permission များကို ခွင့်ပြုမီ တိုကင်ကန်ထရက်တွေကို အမြဲ စစ်ဆေးပါ။
$ETH ပေါ်မှာ MEV protection tool တွေနဲ့ သင် ဘယ်တုန်းက ဆက်သွယ်ခဲ့ဖူးပါသလဲ။ on-chain လုံခြုံရေးအတွက် သင့်ရဲ့ နည်းဗျူဟာက ဘာလဲ?
#MEV #Ethereum #DeFiSecurity #SandwichAttack #Crypto
ဆန်းဒ်ဝစ်ချ် (sandwich) တိုက်ခိုက်မှုနည်းဗျူဟာကို အလွန်တော်တက်အောင် လုပ်ဆောင်နိုင်ခဲ့သည့် ဘော့တစ်ခုဖြစ်သော်လည်း အတုတင် တိုကင်များနှင့် လိမ်လည်ထားသော စမတ်ကန်ထရက်များက ၎င်း၏ လော့ဂျစ် (logic) တွင် အားနည်းချက်တစ်ခုကို ပေါ်ထွက်စေပြီးနောက် အသုံးချခံခဲ့ရသည်။ တိုက်ခိုက်သူက လှည့်ဖြားတတ်သော အခွင့်အရေးများကို တင်ပြခဲ့သဖြင့် တရားဝင် (legitimate) ရန်ပုံငွေများကို စီးထုတ်ရန် သူတို့အား ခွင့်ပြုခဲ့သည်။ လုံခြုံရေးကုမ္ပဏီ Blockaid က ထို exploit (အကန့်အသတ်များကို ဖောက်ထွင်းသည့်လုပ်ရပ်) တွင် သုံးစွဲခွင့် (spending permissions) ကို မှန်ကန်စွာ ပြန်ရုတ်မသိမ်းထားသည့် transaction များ ပါဝင်ကြောင်း အတည်ပြုခဲ့သည်။
on-chain (ကွင်းဆက်ပေါ်) မက်ဆေ့ချ်တစ်ခုတွင် ဘော့ အော်ပရေတာက 48 နာရီအတွင်း 2,150 ETH (~$3.7M) ပြန်ပေးရန် 50% white hat bounty ကို ကမ်းလှမ်းခဲ့သည်။ သို့သော် တိုက်ခိုက်သူက လိမ်လည်ထားသည့် ရန်ပုံငွေများကို Tornado Cash မှတစ်ဆင့် လမ်းကြောင်းဖုံးကွယ်ရန်မှာ အနည်းဆုံး စတင်နေပြီဖြစ်သည်။
DeFi ကုန်သည်များအတွက် အဓိက သိမှတ်ချက်- အလိုအလျောက် ချက်ချင်းလုပ်ဆောင်နိုင်လွန်းတဲ့ နည်းဗျူဟာတွေတောင် စမတ်ကန်ထရက်အန္တရာယ် (risk) ကို သယ်ဆောင်လာနိုင်သည်။ အကျိုးအမြတ်အခွင့်အရေးတွေကို စကင်ဖတ်သည့် MEV ဘော့တွေကို ကိုယ့်ကိုယ်ကိုယ်ပါ ပြန်တိုက်ခိုက်သည့်အဖြစ် အသုံးချနိုင်သည်။ spending permission များကို ခွင့်ပြုမီ တိုကင်ကန်ထရက်တွေကို အမြဲ စစ်ဆေးပါ။
$ETH ပေါ်မှာ MEV protection tool တွေနဲ့ သင် ဘယ်တုန်းက ဆက်သွယ်ခဲ့ဖူးပါသလဲ။ on-chain လုံခြုံရေးအတွက် သင့်ရဲ့ နည်းဗျူဟာက ဘာလဲ?
#MEV #Ethereum #DeFiSecurity #SandwichAttack #Crypto
12
ලිපිය
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
«Хижак став здобиччю»: аналіз найгучнішого DeFi-скандалу вихідних.JaredFromSubway втратив до $15 млнПоки крипторинок відпочивав на вихідних, в екосистемі Ethereum розгорнулася справжня драма. Один із найвідоміших та найагресивніших сендвіч-ботів — jaredfromsubway.eth — сам став жертвою майстерно розставленої пастки.
Сьогодні, коли перші емоції вщухли, аналітики Blockaid та ончейн-дослідники повністю розібрали механіку цього витонченого експлуату, який коштував боту від $7,5 млн до понад $15 млн.
🛠 Як саме хакери перехитрили алгоритм?
JaredFromSubway роками заробляв мільйони на «сендвіч-атаках» (перехопленні транзакцій користувачів). Проте зловмисники використали його ж автоматизацію проти нього:
Принада: Хакери створили пули з фейковими токенами-обгортками та штучно запустили торги.Злам логіки: Бот автоматично зреагував на об'єм і спробував провести сендвіч-атаку. Але смартконтракт хакерів змусив роутер бота підписати безлімітне схвалення на розпорядження своїми коштами.Очищення балансів: Отримавши дозвіл, зловмисники через функцію transferFrom миттєво викачали з бота реальні активи — WETH, USDC та USDT. Бот купував «повітря», віддаючи справжню ліквідність.
💰 Актуальний статус: $1,000,000 за повернення коштів
Масштаб удару виявився настільки критичним, що розробник JaredFromSubway оперативно відреагував і запропонував хакеру нагороду у розмірі $1 000 000 в обмін на повернення решти коштів. Розробник гарантує анонімність та статус «білого хакера», якщо активи повернуться. Спільнота зараз активно стежить за ончейн-гаманцями зловмисника — чи піде він на угоду.
Що це означає для Web3-індустрії?
Кінець абсолютної монополії MEV: Боти, які раніше контролювали левову частку сендвіч-трафіку в Ethereum, виявилися вразливими перед нестандартним кодом.Нова ера кібербезпеки: Цей кейс довів, що захищати від зламу потрібно не лише протоколи, а й самі алгоритми автоматичної торгівлі.
👇 Як гадаєте, чи прийме хакер пропозицію у $1 млн, чи залишить усе собі? І чи зможуть MEV-боти оговтатися після такого удару? Пишіть у коментарях!
#Ethereum #MEV #CryptoNews #Web3 #Security #DeFi
«Хижак став здобиччю»: аналіз найгучнішого DeFi-скандалу вихідних.JaredFromSubway втратив до $15 млн
Поки крипторинок відпочивав на вихідних, в екосистемі Ethereum розгорнулася справжня драма. Один із найвідоміших та найагресивніших сендвіч-ботів — jaredfromsubway.eth — сам став жертвою майстерно розставленої пастки.
Сьогодні, коли перші емоції вщухли, аналітики Blockaid та ончейн-дослідники повністю розібрали механіку цього витонченого експлуату, який коштував боту від $7,5 млн до понад $15 млн.
🛠 Як саме хакери перехитрили алгоритм?
JaredFromSubway роками заробляв мільйони на «сендвіч-атаках» (перехопленні транзакцій користувачів). Проте зловмисники використали його ж автоматизацію проти нього:
Принада: Хакери створили пули з фейковими токенами-обгортками та штучно запустили торги.Злам логіки: Бот автоматично зреагував на об'єм і спробував провести сендвіч-атаку. Але смартконтракт хакерів змусив роутер бота підписати безлімітне схвалення на розпорядження своїми коштами.Очищення балансів: Отримавши дозвіл, зловмисники через функцію transferFrom миттєво викачали з бота реальні активи — WETH, USDC та USDT. Бот купував «повітря», віддаючи справжню ліквідність.
💰 Актуальний статус: $1,000,000 за повернення коштів
Масштаб удару виявився настільки критичним, що розробник JaredFromSubway оперативно відреагував і запропонував хакеру нагороду у розмірі $1 000 000 в обмін на повернення решти коштів. Розробник гарантує анонімність та статус «білого хакера», якщо активи повернуться. Спільнота зараз активно стежить за ончейн-гаманцями зловмисника — чи піде він на угоду.
Що це означає для Web3-індустрії?
Кінець абсолютної монополії MEV: Боти, які раніше контролювали левову частку сендвіч-трафіку в Ethereum, виявилися вразливими перед нестандартним кодом.Нова ера кібербезпеки: Цей кейс довів, що захищати від зламу потрібно не лише протоколи, а й самі алгоритми автоматичної торгівлі.
👇 Як гадаєте, чи прийме хакер пропозицію у $1 млн, чи залишить усе собі? І чи зможуть MEV-боти оговтатися після такого удару? Пишіть у коментарях!
#Ethereum #MEV #CryptoNews #Web3 #Security #DeFi
Сьогодні, коли перші емоції вщухли, аналітики Blockaid та ончейн-дослідники повністю розібрали механіку цього витонченого експлуату, який коштував боту від $7,5 млн до понад $15 млн.
🛠 Як саме хакери перехитрили алгоритм?
JaredFromSubway роками заробляв мільйони на «сендвіч-атаках» (перехопленні транзакцій користувачів). Проте зловмисники використали його ж автоматизацію проти нього:
Принада: Хакери створили пули з фейковими токенами-обгортками та штучно запустили торги.Злам логіки: Бот автоматично зреагував на об'єм і спробував провести сендвіч-атаку. Але смартконтракт хакерів змусив роутер бота підписати безлімітне схвалення на розпорядження своїми коштами.Очищення балансів: Отримавши дозвіл, зловмисники через функцію transferFrom миттєво викачали з бота реальні активи — WETH, USDC та USDT. Бот купував «повітря», віддаючи справжню ліквідність.
💰 Актуальний статус: $1,000,000 за повернення коштів
Масштаб удару виявився настільки критичним, що розробник JaredFromSubway оперативно відреагував і запропонував хакеру нагороду у розмірі $1 000 000 в обмін на повернення решти коштів. Розробник гарантує анонімність та статус «білого хакера», якщо активи повернуться. Спільнота зараз активно стежить за ончейн-гаманцями зловмисника — чи піде він на угоду.
Що це означає для Web3-індустрії?
Кінець абсолютної монополії MEV: Боти, які раніше контролювали левову частку сендвіч-трафіку в Ethereum, виявилися вразливими перед нестандартним кодом.Нова ера кібербезпеки: Цей кейс довів, що захищати від зламу потрібно не лише протоколи, а й самі алгоритми автоматичної торгівлі.
👇 Як гадаєте, чи прийме хакер пропозицію у $1 млн, чи залишить усе собі? І чи зможуть MEV-боти оговтатися після такого удару? Пишіть у коментарях!
#Ethereum #MEV #CryptoNews #Web3 #Security #DeFi
7
91
පරිවර්තනය බලන්න
🤯 The MEV Bot That Robbed Millions of Traders Just Got ROBBED Itself — $15M Gone!
You know "Jared from Subway" — the infamous MEV sandwich bot that has been front-running and draining regular DeFi traders for years, making millions off unsuspecting users?
Well... karma just arrived. 😂
Over the weekend, an attacker drained Jared's bot for $15 million — not by hacking any code, but by tricking the bot's own automated logic using fake tokens and liquidity pools that looked like profitable opportunities.
The bot that played everyone just got played.
Now Jared is offering a 50% white hat bounty to get the funds back, while threatening legal action at the same time. On a bot that spent years legally stealing from users. 💀
The crypto streets have no mercy.
Is this justice or just another hack? 👇
$ETH $BTC #DeFi #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare #MEV
🤯 The MEV Bot That Robbed Millions of Traders Just Got ROBBED Itself — $15M Gone!
You know "Jared from Subway" — the infamous MEV sandwich bot that has been front-running and draining regular DeFi traders for years, making millions off unsuspecting users?
Well... karma just arrived. 😂
Over the weekend, an attacker drained Jared's bot for $15 million — not by hacking any code, but by tricking the bot's own automated logic using fake tokens and liquidity pools that looked like profitable opportunities.
The bot that played everyone just got played.
Now Jared is offering a 50% white hat bounty to get the funds back, while threatening legal action at the same time. On a bot that spent years legally stealing from users. 💀
The crypto streets have no mercy.
Is this justice or just another hack? 👇
$ETH $BTC #DeFi #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare #MEV
You know "Jared from Subway" — the infamous MEV sandwich bot that has been front-running and draining regular DeFi traders for years, making millions off unsuspecting users?
Well... karma just arrived. 😂
Over the weekend, an attacker drained Jared's bot for $15 million — not by hacking any code, but by tricking the bot's own automated logic using fake tokens and liquidity pools that looked like profitable opportunities.
The bot that played everyone just got played.
Now Jared is offering a 50% white hat bounty to get the funds back, while threatening legal action at the same time. On a bot that spent years legally stealing from users. 💀
The crypto streets have no mercy.
Is this justice or just another hack? 👇
$ETH $BTC #DeFi #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare #MEV
1
1
78
තවත් අන්තර්ගතයන් ගවේෂණය කිරීමට ඇතුල් වන්න
Binance චතුරශ්රය හි ගෝලීය ක්රිප්ටෝ පරිශීලකයින් හා එක්වන්න
⚡️ ක්රිප්ටෝ පිළිබඳ නවතම සහ ප්රයෝජනවත් තොරතුරු ලබා ගන්න.
💬 ලොව විශාලතම ක්රිප්ටෝ හුවමාරුව මගින් විශ්වාස කෙරේ.
👍 සත්යායනය කරන ලද නිර්මාණකරුවන්ගෙන් සැබෑ විදසුන් සොයා ගන්න.
විද්යුත් තැපෑල / දුරකථන අංකය
නැගී එන මාතෘකා
1
#AppleDebutsFoldablePhone
49,050 views
968 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
2
#TSMCAugustRevenueUp53.3%YoY
11,930 views
336 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
3
#IranSaysReadyToEscalateWarWithUS
15,163 views
346 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
4
#EUExtendsCentralContactPointToCASPs
14,911 views
380 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
5
#US10YTreasuryYieldHitsHighestSinceNov2023
38,634 views
603 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
6
#USTreasuryToBuyBackUpTo$6BLongDatedDebt
21,814 views
182 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
7
#BitcoinSurpasses$79K
76,270 views
296 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
8
#BrentCrudeTops$100
135,071 views
423 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
9
#USADPWeeklyEmploymentRises12000
127,925 views
1,532 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
10
#BankOfAmericaGroupPilotsUSBDCStablecoin
94,392 views
1,203 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්