#coindcx
coindcx
Просмотров: 213,091
359 обсуждают
Популярные
Новые
·
--
$16M Lost — Who Is Responsible When Old Deposit Addresses Still Work?
CoinDCX reportedly absorbed a $15.99M $USDT loss after users sent funds to retired deposit addresses following its 2025 security breach. Customer balances reportedly remain unaffected.
A retired address doesn’t disappear from the blockchain. Users may still send funds to it, even when an exchange no longer supports deposits through that address.
This highlights a critical security gap: users must verify deposit details, while exchanges need clear warnings and effective recovery procedures.
Should the responsibility fall on the user, the exchange, or both?
#CryptoSecurity #CoinDCX #Blockchain $BTC
$16M Lost — Who Is Responsible When Old Deposit Addresses Still Work?
CoinDCX reportedly absorbed a $15.99M $USDT loss after users sent funds to retired deposit addresses following its 2025 security breach. Customer balances reportedly remain unaffected.
A retired address doesn’t disappear from the blockchain. Users may still send funds to it, even when an exchange no longer supports deposits through that address.
This highlights a critical security gap: users must verify deposit details, while exchanges need clear warnings and effective recovery procedures.
Should the responsibility fall on the user, the exchange, or both?
#CryptoSecurity #CoinDCX #Blockchain $BTC
CoinDCX reportedly absorbed a $15.99M $USDT loss after users sent funds to retired deposit addresses following its 2025 security breach. Customer balances reportedly remain unaffected.
A retired address doesn’t disappear from the blockchain. Users may still send funds to it, even when an exchange no longer supports deposits through that address.
This highlights a critical security gap: users must verify deposit details, while exchanges need clear warnings and effective recovery procedures.
Should the responsibility fall on the user, the exchange, or both?
#CryptoSecurity #CoinDCX #Blockchain $BTC
1
68
*The $16M Lesson: 'Retired' does NOT mean 'Disconnected'*
The CoinDCX case is scary not because $15.99M was stolen, but HOW it was stolen.
Look at the on-chain data you posted:
- *$15.99M USDT taken from 40 wallets*
- *$15.82M from ONE deposit address alone*
- *5 MINUTES* after CoinDCX's own system moved a customer deposit through that same old address, the thief moved in.
- OKX $5.46M, Other wallets $4.17M, Binance $2.61M, Only $2.21M frozen by Tether.
CoinDCX called them "old addresses". But their own system was STILL sweeping customer deposits through them that same morning!
This is the key point @Susano_Tr made and I agree 100%:
> If money can be sent to these addresses, deposited into the customer's account and then swept into the main wallet via an external service, then these are still part of the exchange's risk. 'Retired' should NOT mean disconnected.
*So, are our funds safe on exchanges?*
Proof of Reserves is not enough. It proves what they HAVE, not what they could LOSE through old infrastructure.
What exchanges should be doing after any wallet migration:
1. *Hard Kill Switch:* Old deposit addresses must be disabled at the smart contract / sweeping level, not just hidden from the UI.
2. *Clear Warnings:* If a user somehow sends to an old address, block it and warn: "This is a retired address".
3. *Balance Alerts:* Real-time alert if any old wallet receives > $1. Never let $15.82M sit in one "retired" address.
4. *Reconciliation Checks:* What customers owe vs what is actually in ALL wallets (including old) must match every hour.
5. *Post-Migration Monitoring:* Monitor old wallets for at least 12 months after migration. Someone else is monitoring them — attackers.
CoinDCX did the right thing saying they absorbed the loss and customer balances were not impacted. But the next exchange might not be able to afford that.
Your funds are as safe as an exchange's *worst old wallet*, not its newest cold wallet.
What do you think — should exchanges be forced to publicly disclose when they retire addresses and how they are disabled?
#CoinDCX
*The $16M Lesson: 'Retired' does NOT mean 'Disconnected'*
The CoinDCX case is scary not because $15.99M was stolen, but HOW it was stolen.
Look at the on-chain data you posted:
- *$15.99M USDT taken from 40 wallets*
- *$15.82M from ONE deposit address alone*
- *5 MINUTES* after CoinDCX's own system moved a customer deposit through that same old address, the thief moved in.
- OKX $5.46M, Other wallets $4.17M, Binance $2.61M, Only $2.21M frozen by Tether.
CoinDCX called them "old addresses". But their own system was STILL sweeping customer deposits through them that same morning!
This is the key point @Susano_Tr made and I agree 100%:
> If money can be sent to these addresses, deposited into the customer's account and then swept into the main wallet via an external service, then these are still part of the exchange's risk. 'Retired' should NOT mean disconnected.
*So, are our funds safe on exchanges?*
Proof of Reserves is not enough. It proves what they HAVE, not what they could LOSE through old infrastructure.
What exchanges should be doing after any wallet migration:
1. *Hard Kill Switch:* Old deposit addresses must be disabled at the smart contract / sweeping level, not just hidden from the UI.
2. *Clear Warnings:* If a user somehow sends to an old address, block it and warn: "This is a retired address".
3. *Balance Alerts:* Real-time alert if any old wallet receives > $1. Never let $15.82M sit in one "retired" address.
4. *Reconciliation Checks:* What customers owe vs what is actually in ALL wallets (including old) must match every hour.
5. *Post-Migration Monitoring:* Monitor old wallets for at least 12 months after migration. Someone else is monitoring them — attackers.
CoinDCX did the right thing saying they absorbed the loss and customer balances were not impacted. But the next exchange might not be able to afford that.
Your funds are as safe as an exchange's *worst old wallet*, not its newest cold wallet.
What do you think — should exchanges be forced to publicly disclose when they retire addresses and how they are disabled?
#CoinDCX
The CoinDCX case is scary not because $15.99M was stolen, but HOW it was stolen.
Look at the on-chain data you posted:
- *$15.99M USDT taken from 40 wallets*
- *$15.82M from ONE deposit address alone*
- *5 MINUTES* after CoinDCX's own system moved a customer deposit through that same old address, the thief moved in.
- OKX $5.46M, Other wallets $4.17M, Binance $2.61M, Only $2.21M frozen by Tether.
CoinDCX called them "old addresses". But their own system was STILL sweeping customer deposits through them that same morning!
This is the key point @Susano_Tr made and I agree 100%:
> If money can be sent to these addresses, deposited into the customer's account and then swept into the main wallet via an external service, then these are still part of the exchange's risk. 'Retired' should NOT mean disconnected.
*So, are our funds safe on exchanges?*
Proof of Reserves is not enough. It proves what they HAVE, not what they could LOSE through old infrastructure.
What exchanges should be doing after any wallet migration:
1. *Hard Kill Switch:* Old deposit addresses must be disabled at the smart contract / sweeping level, not just hidden from the UI.
2. *Clear Warnings:* If a user somehow sends to an old address, block it and warn: "This is a retired address".
3. *Balance Alerts:* Real-time alert if any old wallet receives > $1. Never let $15.82M sit in one "retired" address.
4. *Reconciliation Checks:* What customers owe vs what is actually in ALL wallets (including old) must match every hour.
5. *Post-Migration Monitoring:* Monitor old wallets for at least 12 months after migration. Someone else is monitoring them — attackers.
CoinDCX did the right thing saying they absorbed the loss and customer balances were not impacted. But the next exchange might not be able to afford that.
Your funds are as safe as an exchange's *worst old wallet*, not its newest cold wallet.
What do you think — should exchanges be forced to publicly disclose when they retire addresses and how they are disabled?
#CoinDCX
58
·
--
CoinDCX just confirmed a $15.99M loss, and the details are worse than the headline.
India's largest exchange says attackers drained 15.99M $USDT from deprecated wallets left over from its July 2025 hack. An automated sweeping service failed, so user deposits kept piling up in old, vulnerable addresses until they were emptied on October 21 and routed onward to major exchanges.
The uncomfortable part is the reversal. CEO Sumit Gupta first dismissed the outflow reports as a "false alarm," only to confirm the loss days later after onchain investigators pushed back. The exchange says it absorbed the loss, user funds in segregated cold wallets are safe, and trading was never interrupted.
Oldman view: $16M is survivable for a top exchange, but a second incident on the SAME deprecated infrastructure is an operational failure, not bad luck. Until CoinDCX explains how the wallets were exploited and when the sweeps stopped, trust, not price, is the real damage here.
Risk to watch: the exploit method is still unexplained, and it is unclear whether the same actors from 2025 are involved. This is an exchange security story, not a reason to panic sell the wider market.
📌 Sharing personal opinions only, not financial advice or a recommendation to buy/sell. Crypto is highly risky; DYOR and you are solely responsible. No coin promotion.
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #CryptoExchange #Binance
CoinDCX just confirmed a $15.99M loss, and the details are worse than the headline.
India's largest exchange says attackers drained 15.99M $USDT from deprecated wallets left over from its July 2025 hack. An automated sweeping service failed, so user deposits kept piling up in old, vulnerable addresses until they were emptied on October 21 and routed onward to major exchanges.
The uncomfortable part is the reversal. CEO Sumit Gupta first dismissed the outflow reports as a "false alarm," only to confirm the loss days later after onchain investigators pushed back. The exchange says it absorbed the loss, user funds in segregated cold wallets are safe, and trading was never interrupted.
Oldman view: $16M is survivable for a top exchange, but a second incident on the SAME deprecated infrastructure is an operational failure, not bad luck. Until CoinDCX explains how the wallets were exploited and when the sweeps stopped, trust, not price, is the real damage here.
Risk to watch: the exploit method is still unexplained, and it is unclear whether the same actors from 2025 are involved. This is an exchange security story, not a reason to panic sell the wider market.
📌 Sharing personal opinions only, not financial advice or a recommendation to buy/sell. Crypto is highly risky; DYOR and you are solely responsible. No coin promotion.
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #CryptoExchange #Binance
India's largest exchange says attackers drained 15.99M $USDT from deprecated wallets left over from its July 2025 hack. An automated sweeping service failed, so user deposits kept piling up in old, vulnerable addresses until they were emptied on October 21 and routed onward to major exchanges.
The uncomfortable part is the reversal. CEO Sumit Gupta first dismissed the outflow reports as a "false alarm," only to confirm the loss days later after onchain investigators pushed back. The exchange says it absorbed the loss, user funds in segregated cold wallets are safe, and trading was never interrupted.
Oldman view: $16M is survivable for a top exchange, but a second incident on the SAME deprecated infrastructure is an operational failure, not bad luck. Until CoinDCX explains how the wallets were exploited and when the sweeps stopped, trust, not price, is the real damage here.
Risk to watch: the exploit method is still unexplained, and it is unclear whether the same actors from 2025 are involved. This is an exchange security story, not a reason to panic sell the wider market.
📌 Sharing personal opinions only, not financial advice or a recommendation to buy/sell. Crypto is highly risky; DYOR and you are solely responsible. No coin promotion.
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #CryptoExchange #Binance
Abu Fahadأ:
💛
1
813
·
--
$DCX.US 🚨 COINDCX REPORTS $15.99 MILLION USDT LOSS
Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX has confirmed a loss of 15.99 million USDT linked to old wallet infrastructure affected by a previous security incident.
🔍 What happened?
• An automated service designed to move deposits from retired wallets failed for a period.
• Some deposits accumulated in the old wallet infrastructure.
• CoinDCX says the company absorbed the loss.
• The exchange says customer balances, active wallets and trading systems were unaffected.
🛡️ Why it matters: This incident highlights the importance of wallet security, monitoring legacy systems and communicating transparently when security concerns arise.
📌 These details reflect CoinDCX’s statement; the company’s claims about customer funds have not been independently verified here.
🔗 Official source: https://coindcx.com/blog/coindcx-news/on-chain-wallet-activity-update-21-oct-2026
What security measures should crypto platforms prioritize to protect users? 👇
#CoinDCX #USDT #CryptoSecurity #blockchain #CryptoNews
{stock_us}(DCX.US)
$DCX.US 🚨 COINDCX REPORTS $15.99 MILLION USDT LOSS
Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX has confirmed a loss of 15.99 million USDT linked to old wallet infrastructure affected by a previous security incident.
🔍 What happened?
• An automated service designed to move deposits from retired wallets failed for a period.
• Some deposits accumulated in the old wallet infrastructure.
• CoinDCX says the company absorbed the loss.
• The exchange says customer balances, active wallets and trading systems were unaffected.
🛡️ Why it matters: This incident highlights the importance of wallet security, monitoring legacy systems and communicating transparently when security concerns arise.
📌 These details reflect CoinDCX’s statement; the company’s claims about customer funds have not been independently verified here.
🔗 Official source: https://coindcx.com/blog/coindcx-news/on-chain-wallet-activity-update-21-oct-2026
What security measures should crypto platforms prioritize to protect users? 👇
#CoinDCX #USDT #CryptoSecurity #blockchain #CryptoNews
Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX has confirmed a loss of 15.99 million USDT linked to old wallet infrastructure affected by a previous security incident.
🔍 What happened?
• An automated service designed to move deposits from retired wallets failed for a period.
• Some deposits accumulated in the old wallet infrastructure.
• CoinDCX says the company absorbed the loss.
• The exchange says customer balances, active wallets and trading systems were unaffected.
🛡️ Why it matters: This incident highlights the importance of wallet security, monitoring legacy systems and communicating transparently when security concerns arise.
📌 These details reflect CoinDCX’s statement; the company’s claims about customer funds have not been independently verified here.
🔗 Official source: https://coindcx.com/blog/coindcx-news/on-chain-wallet-activity-update-21-oct-2026
What security measures should crypto platforms prioritize to protect users? 👇
#CoinDCX #USDT #CryptoSecurity #blockchain #CryptoNews
DCXUS+1,44%
33
·
--
⚠️ COINDCX CONFIRMS A $16M LOSS DAYS AFTER CALLING IT A "FALSE ALARM"
The Indian exchange now admits it:
→ User deposits piled up in old wallets that were retired after its $44M hack in July 2025
→ An automated fund-sweeping system failed, and about $15.99M in USDT was drained from TRON deposit addresses
→ Losses from the two incidents now total nearly $60M
CoinDCX says it will cover the loss and that user funds are safe. Onchain investigator ZachXBT, who challenged the first denials, is urging customers to withdraw.
Lesson for every platform: "retired" wallets are still wallets. If keys were compromised once, they stay compromised.
How much of your crypto do you keep on exchanges right now? 👇
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Hack #CryptoNews
⚠️ COINDCX CONFIRMS A $16M LOSS DAYS AFTER CALLING IT A "FALSE ALARM"
The Indian exchange now admits it:
→ User deposits piled up in old wallets that were retired after its $44M hack in July 2025
→ An automated fund-sweeping system failed, and about $15.99M in USDT was drained from TRON deposit addresses
→ Losses from the two incidents now total nearly $60M
CoinDCX says it will cover the loss and that user funds are safe. Onchain investigator ZachXBT, who challenged the first denials, is urging customers to withdraw.
Lesson for every platform: "retired" wallets are still wallets. If keys were compromised once, they stay compromised.
How much of your crypto do you keep on exchanges right now? 👇
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Hack #CryptoNews
The Indian exchange now admits it:
→ User deposits piled up in old wallets that were retired after its $44M hack in July 2025
→ An automated fund-sweeping system failed, and about $15.99M in USDT was drained from TRON deposit addresses
→ Losses from the two incidents now total nearly $60M
CoinDCX says it will cover the loss and that user funds are safe. Onchain investigator ZachXBT, who challenged the first denials, is urging customers to withdraw.
Lesson for every platform: "retired" wallets are still wallets. If keys were compromised once, they stay compromised.
How much of your crypto do you keep on exchanges right now? 👇
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Hack #CryptoNews
1
80
·
--
🚨 CoinDCX Confirms $15.99 Million USDT Loss! 😱
India’s Crypto Exchange Reveals A $15.99 Million Loss After An Automated Wallet-Sweeping Failure In Previously Compromised Wallet Infrastructure. CoinDCX Says Customer Balances And Active Trading Systems Remain Unaffected. 💰🔐
#CoinDCX #cryptoindia #BreakingNews @Binance_South_Asia @Binance_News @Binance_Square_Official $NVDAB
🚨 CoinDCX Confirms $15.99 Million USDT Loss! 😱
India’s Crypto Exchange Reveals A $15.99 Million Loss After An Automated Wallet-Sweeping Failure In Previously Compromised Wallet Infrastructure. CoinDCX Says Customer Balances And Active Trading Systems Remain Unaffected. 💰🔐
#CoinDCX #cryptoindia #BreakingNews @Binance South Asia @Binance News @Binance Square Official $NVDAB
India’s Crypto Exchange Reveals A $15.99 Million Loss After An Automated Wallet-Sweeping Failure In Previously Compromised Wallet Infrastructure. CoinDCX Says Customer Balances And Active Trading Systems Remain Unaffected. 💰🔐
#CoinDCX #cryptoindia #BreakingNews @Binance South Asia @Binance News @Binance Square Official $NVDAB
56
·
--
A “false alarm” that became a $16 million loss? That makes me uneasy. 😬
CoinDCX, India’s largest crypto exchange, initially dismissed reports of suspicious outflows. Now it says an internal process failure tied to a retired wallet caused a $16 million loss—and the exchange will absorb it.
I’m relieved it’s taking the hit, but that reversal deserves scrutiny. 🔍
What matters more to your trust: absorbing the loss or explaining exactly how the failure happened?
#Crypto #CoinDCX #ExchangeSecurity
A “false alarm” that became a $16 million loss? That makes me uneasy. 😬
CoinDCX, India’s largest crypto exchange, initially dismissed reports of suspicious outflows. Now it says an internal process failure tied to a retired wallet caused a $16 million loss—and the exchange will absorb it.
I’m relieved it’s taking the hit, but that reversal deserves scrutiny. 🔍
What matters more to your trust: absorbing the loss or explaining exactly how the failure happened?
#Crypto #CoinDCX #ExchangeSecurity
CoinDCX, India’s largest crypto exchange, initially dismissed reports of suspicious outflows. Now it says an internal process failure tied to a retired wallet caused a $16 million loss—and the exchange will absorb it.
I’m relieved it’s taking the hit, but that reversal deserves scrutiny. 🔍
What matters more to your trust: absorbing the loss or explaining exactly how the failure happened?
#Crypto #CoinDCX #ExchangeSecurity
107
·
--
CoinDCX, India's largest crypto exchange, absorbed a 6 million loss after an internal sweeping process failed to move customer deposits from a retired wallet.\n\nThe wallet was deprecated following a July 2025 security incident, but users kept depositing to it. The broken sweep process left 5.99M USDT stuck, which the exchange covered.\n\nCoinDCX says all user funds remain safe in segregated cold wallets. What's your take on exchange operational risks?\n\n#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity
CoinDCX, India's largest crypto exchange, absorbed a 6 million loss after an internal sweeping process failed to move customer deposits from a retired wallet.\n\nThe wallet was deprecated following a July 2025 security incident, but users kept depositing to it. The broken sweep process left 5.99M USDT stuck, which the exchange covered.\n\nCoinDCX says all user funds remain safe in segregated cold wallets. What's your take on exchange operational risks?\n\n#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity
1
131
·
--
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
🚨 BREAKING: CoinDCX Admits to $16M Loss 🚨
Indian cryptocurrency exchange CoinDCX has officially confirmed a massive $15.99 million loss.
What makes this surprising? Just a few days ago, the exchange firmly denied rumors that its platform had been compromised by a hack. Now, they have stepped forward to admit the multimillion-dollar hit.
Key Takeaways for Traders:
🔹 The Flip-Flop: The team initially called the hack rumors false before officially admitting the loss.
🔹 The Impact: Nearly $16 million is gone.
🔹 The Lesson: This is a major reminder that exchange security is never guaranteed. Always stay updated and manage your risks carefully! 🛡️
What are your thoughts on this sudden U-turn by the exchange? Drop your thoughts in the comments! 👇
#CoinDCX #BinancePick #BİNANCESQUARE #Binace #crypto
$BTC $BNB
🚨 BREAKING: CoinDCX Admits to $16M Loss 🚨
Indian cryptocurrency exchange CoinDCX has officially confirmed a massive $15.99 million loss.
What makes this surprising? Just a few days ago, the exchange firmly denied rumors that its platform had been compromised by a hack. Now, they have stepped forward to admit the multimillion-dollar hit.
Key Takeaways for Traders:
🔹 The Flip-Flop: The team initially called the hack rumors false before officially admitting the loss.
🔹 The Impact: Nearly $16 million is gone.
🔹 The Lesson: This is a major reminder that exchange security is never guaranteed. Always stay updated and manage your risks carefully! 🛡️
What are your thoughts on this sudden U-turn by the exchange? Drop your thoughts in the comments! 👇
#CoinDCX #BinancePick #BİNANCESQUARE #Binace #crypto
$BTC $BNB
Indian cryptocurrency exchange CoinDCX has officially confirmed a massive $15.99 million loss.
What makes this surprising? Just a few days ago, the exchange firmly denied rumors that its platform had been compromised by a hack. Now, they have stepped forward to admit the multimillion-dollar hit.
Key Takeaways for Traders:
🔹 The Flip-Flop: The team initially called the hack rumors false before officially admitting the loss.
🔹 The Impact: Nearly $16 million is gone.
🔹 The Lesson: This is a major reminder that exchange security is never guaranteed. Always stay updated and manage your risks carefully! 🛡️
What are your thoughts on this sudden U-turn by the exchange? Drop your thoughts in the comments! 👇
#CoinDCX #BinancePick #BİNANCESQUARE #Binace #crypto
$BTC $BNB
114
🚨 CRYPTO SECURITY ALERT: REPORTED $16M LOSS AT COINDCX! 🔐
A new report says Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX confirmed a loss of approximately $16 million involving retired wallets. The incident highlights why wallet management and security controls matter—even after addresses are no longer actively used.
🔎 3 important lessons for every crypto user:
🔐 Review wallet security: Retired addresses and old infrastructure still need proper controls.
🛡️ Verify the facts: Follow official exchange statements and avoid spreading unconfirmed claims.
⚠️ Protect yourself: Never share your seed phrase, private keys, or one-time passwords with anyone.
💬 Question for the community: Do you think crypto platforms should publish regular independent security audits? Why or why not?
🔔 Follow CryptoWithSahil for daily crypto news, market insights, and blockchain updates!
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #blockchain #CryptoNews #Web3
🚨 CRYPTO SECURITY ALERT: REPORTED $16M LOSS AT COINDCX! 🔐
A new report says Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX confirmed a loss of approximately $16 million involving retired wallets. The incident highlights why wallet management and security controls matter—even after addresses are no longer actively used.
🔎 3 important lessons for every crypto user:
🔐 Review wallet security: Retired addresses and old infrastructure still need proper controls.
🛡️ Verify the facts: Follow official exchange statements and avoid spreading unconfirmed claims.
⚠️ Protect yourself: Never share your seed phrase, private keys, or one-time passwords with anyone.
💬 Question for the community: Do you think crypto platforms should publish regular independent security audits? Why or why not?
🔔 Follow CryptoWithSahil for daily crypto news, market insights, and blockchain updates!
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #blockchain #CryptoNews #Web3
A new report says Indian crypto exchange CoinDCX confirmed a loss of approximately $16 million involving retired wallets. The incident highlights why wallet management and security controls matter—even after addresses are no longer actively used.
🔎 3 important lessons for every crypto user:
🔐 Review wallet security: Retired addresses and old infrastructure still need proper controls.
🛡️ Verify the facts: Follow official exchange statements and avoid spreading unconfirmed claims.
⚠️ Protect yourself: Never share your seed phrase, private keys, or one-time passwords with anyone.
💬 Question for the community: Do you think crypto platforms should publish regular independent security audits? Why or why not?
🔔 Follow CryptoWithSahil for daily crypto news, market insights, and blockchain updates!
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #blockchain #CryptoNews #Web3
72
CoinDCX has now put a number on its TRON outflow: 15.99M USDT, lost from an old wallet it had called retired. Tether froze 2.21M of it. That is 13.8%.
On Oct 21 at 23:35 UTC+8, the old address TQKJQ sent 15,819,002 USDT in one transfer to a new wallet, which also took about 172,000 USDT from 39 smaller addresses. By 11:22 UTC+8 on Oct 22 that wallet had sent everything on to six addresses.
Tether blacklisted nine linked addresses at 06:45 UTC+8 on Oct 23, about 19 hours after the first wallet was empty. Those nine hold 2,212,850 USDT. By our math, about 13.78M, or 86.2%, had already moved on.
In a blog post on Oct 25, CoinDCX said the loss hit "old, deprecated wallet infrastructure which had unknown vulnerabilities", that its sweeping service had failed for a period, and that it absorbed the loss. It says customer balances are fully accounted for.
On-chain records read by CryptoWatchDesk show the same old address forwarding USDT as late as May 2026.
A freeze only catches what is still sitting still. Only deposit to the address your exchange app shows you today, never to one saved from before.
$USDT
#CoinDCX #Tether
NFA. DYOR.
CoinDCX has now put a number on its TRON outflow: 15.99M USDT, lost from an old wallet it had called retired. Tether froze 2.21M of it. That is 13.8%.
On Oct 21 at 23:35 UTC+8, the old address TQKJQ sent 15,819,002 USDT in one transfer to a new wallet, which also took about 172,000 USDT from 39 smaller addresses. By 11:22 UTC+8 on Oct 22 that wallet had sent everything on to six addresses.
Tether blacklisted nine linked addresses at 06:45 UTC+8 on Oct 23, about 19 hours after the first wallet was empty. Those nine hold 2,212,850 USDT. By our math, about 13.78M, or 86.2%, had already moved on.
In a blog post on Oct 25, CoinDCX said the loss hit "old, deprecated wallet infrastructure which had unknown vulnerabilities", that its sweeping service had failed for a period, and that it absorbed the loss. It says customer balances are fully accounted for.
On-chain records read by CryptoWatchDesk show the same old address forwarding USDT as late as May 2026.
A freeze only catches what is still sitting still. Only deposit to the address your exchange app shows you today, never to one saved from before.
$USDT
#CoinDCX #Tether
NFA. DYOR.
On Oct 21 at 23:35 UTC+8, the old address TQKJQ sent 15,819,002 USDT in one transfer to a new wallet, which also took about 172,000 USDT from 39 smaller addresses. By 11:22 UTC+8 on Oct 22 that wallet had sent everything on to six addresses.
Tether blacklisted nine linked addresses at 06:45 UTC+8 on Oct 23, about 19 hours after the first wallet was empty. Those nine hold 2,212,850 USDT. By our math, about 13.78M, or 86.2%, had already moved on.
In a blog post on Oct 25, CoinDCX said the loss hit "old, deprecated wallet infrastructure which had unknown vulnerabilities", that its sweeping service had failed for a period, and that it absorbed the loss. It says customer balances are fully accounted for.
On-chain records read by CryptoWatchDesk show the same old address forwarding USDT as late as May 2026.
A freeze only catches what is still sitting still. Only deposit to the address your exchange app shows you today, never to one saved from before.
$USDT
#CoinDCX #Tether
NFA. DYOR.
149
·
--
🔴 CoinDCX Confirms $16M Loss From Its "Retired" Wallets
India's largest crypto exchange has finally put a number on it: $15.99M in $USDT drained on October 21 from legacy wallet infrastructure it says was retired after its July 2025 hack.
Why this admission matters: CoinDCX first denied a new breach. On-chain investigators led by ZachXBT then showed the "retired" address had still been sweeping user deposits as recently as May 2026. Only now, in a blog post shared Sunday, has the exchange confirmed the exact loss, saying it absorbed the cost and that customer deposits were credited and trading was unaffected.
The lesson for every exchange user is blunt: on a key-based chain, a "retired" wallet is not switched off. The key still works. If the sweep fails, funds pile up exactly where attackers already know to look.
⚠️ Honest risk: CoinDCX insists user funds are safe, but independent investigators dispute its account and no forensic report has been published. Until one appears, treat any "legacy wallet" explanation as unverified.
🔑 for self-custody, 🏦 for exchange trust. Which side are you on?
📌 Sharing personal opinions only, not financial advice or a recommendation to buy/sell. Crypto is highly risky; DYOR and you are solely responsible. No coin promotion.
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Crypto #Binance
🔴 CoinDCX Confirms $16M Loss From Its "Retired" Wallets
India's largest crypto exchange has finally put a number on it: $15.99M in $USDT drained on October 21 from legacy wallet infrastructure it says was retired after its July 2025 hack.
Why this admission matters: CoinDCX first denied a new breach. On-chain investigators led by ZachXBT then showed the "retired" address had still been sweeping user deposits as recently as May 2026. Only now, in a blog post shared Sunday, has the exchange confirmed the exact loss, saying it absorbed the cost and that customer deposits were credited and trading was unaffected.
The lesson for every exchange user is blunt: on a key-based chain, a "retired" wallet is not switched off. The key still works. If the sweep fails, funds pile up exactly where attackers already know to look.
⚠️ Honest risk: CoinDCX insists user funds are safe, but independent investigators dispute its account and no forensic report has been published. Until one appears, treat any "legacy wallet" explanation as unverified.
🔑 for self-custody, 🏦 for exchange trust. Which side are you on?
📌 Sharing personal opinions only, not financial advice or a recommendation to buy/sell. Crypto is highly risky; DYOR and you are solely responsible. No coin promotion.
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Crypto #Binance
India's largest crypto exchange has finally put a number on it: $15.99M in $USDT drained on October 21 from legacy wallet infrastructure it says was retired after its July 2025 hack.
Why this admission matters: CoinDCX first denied a new breach. On-chain investigators led by ZachXBT then showed the "retired" address had still been sweeping user deposits as recently as May 2026. Only now, in a blog post shared Sunday, has the exchange confirmed the exact loss, saying it absorbed the cost and that customer deposits were credited and trading was unaffected.
The lesson for every exchange user is blunt: on a key-based chain, a "retired" wallet is not switched off. The key still works. If the sweep fails, funds pile up exactly where attackers already know to look.
⚠️ Honest risk: CoinDCX insists user funds are safe, but independent investigators dispute its account and no forensic report has been published. Until one appears, treat any "legacy wallet" explanation as unverified.
🔑 for self-custody, 🏦 for exchange trust. Which side are you on?
📌 Sharing personal opinions only, not financial advice or a recommendation to buy/sell. Crypto is highly risky; DYOR and you are solely responsible. No coin promotion.
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Crypto #Binance
880
·
--
$16 million in flagged outflows—and a denial. That makes me pause. 😬
Blockchain sleuths flagged suspicious outflows from addresses linked to CoinDCX, India’s largest exchange. CoinDCX denies its active wallets were hacked.
The distinction matters: suspicious transfers aren’t proof of a hack, but a denial alone doesn’t explain the movements. 🔍
I’d want a clear explanation before drawing conclusions. What would reassure you more: a wallet-by-wallet breakdown or an independent review?
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Blockchain
$16 million in flagged outflows—and a denial. That makes me pause. 😬
Blockchain sleuths flagged suspicious outflows from addresses linked to CoinDCX, India’s largest exchange. CoinDCX denies its active wallets were hacked.
The distinction matters: suspicious transfers aren’t proof of a hack, but a denial alone doesn’t explain the movements. 🔍
I’d want a clear explanation before drawing conclusions. What would reassure you more: a wallet-by-wallet breakdown or an independent review?
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Blockchain
Blockchain sleuths flagged suspicious outflows from addresses linked to CoinDCX, India’s largest exchange. CoinDCX denies its active wallets were hacked.
The distinction matters: suspicious transfers aren’t proof of a hack, but a denial alone doesn’t explain the movements. 🔍
I’d want a clear explanation before drawing conclusions. What would reassure you more: a wallet-by-wallet breakdown or an independent review?
#CoinDCX #CryptoSecurity #Blockchain
105
·
--
🚨 $16M $USDT Outflow: A Crypto Security Wake-Up Call?
Around $16M in USDT moved from wallets linked to CoinDCX, raising questions about wallet security and transaction monitoring.
CoinDCX says the issue involved old wallets and that customer funds remain safe.
How do you view this incident—as a warning for exchanges or a reminder to improve wallet management?
What's your view? Share your thoughts in the comments below. 👇
#CryptoSecurity #USDT #CoinDCX #Blockchain #CryptoNews
🚨 $16M $USDT Outflow: A Crypto Security Wake-Up Call?
Around $16M in USDT moved from wallets linked to CoinDCX, raising questions about wallet security and transaction monitoring.
CoinDCX says the issue involved old wallets and that customer funds remain safe.
How do you view this incident—as a warning for exchanges or a reminder to improve wallet management?
What's your view? Share your thoughts in the comments below. 👇
#CryptoSecurity #USDT #CoinDCX #Blockchain #CryptoNews
Around $16M in USDT moved from wallets linked to CoinDCX, raising questions about wallet security and transaction monitoring.
CoinDCX says the issue involved old wallets and that customer funds remain safe.
How do you view this incident—as a warning for exchanges or a reminder to improve wallet management?
What's your view? Share your thoughts in the comments below. 👇
#CryptoSecurity #USDT #CoinDCX #Blockchain #CryptoNews
🛡️ Stronger security needed
0%
🔍 Better monitoring needed
0%
⚖️ More transparency needed
0%
🤔 Need more verified facts
0%
0 проголосовали • Голосование закрыто
60
"退役钱包"这个词，今天算是学到了。
CoinDCX，印度最大那家所。10月21日，TRON上一批旧充值地址流出约1599万U。第一反应是：不是被黑，这些是2025年7月那次被盗（约4400万）留下的老钱包，早就不用了。
然后ZachXBT翻链上：其中一个"老"地址，2026年5月还在往他们热钱包归集充值。
一个被盗过的地址，私钥就该默认不归你了。结果快一年过去，还在收用户的钱，还在走归集流程。这叫退役？这叫没人管。
后来口径改了：自动归集服务出故障，钱在旧地址里越堆越多，平台自己吃下损失，用户余额照常。Tether冻了约220万，也就13%出头，剩下的按链上帖子说法已经拆散进了OKX、币安、Gate。
自己兜底这点给分。但顺序很说明问题：先否认，被链上打脸，再报数字。"不是新漏洞"翻译一下就是"旧漏洞一直没补"，这不是更好听，是更难看。
散户能做的就一件事：别把交易所充值地址存进地址簿反复用，每次充值前去App里重新复制。你存的那个地址，后台还有没有人在看，你不知道，有时候他们自己也不知道。
#CoinDCX
"退役钱包"这个词，今天算是学到了。
CoinDCX，印度最大那家所。10月21日，TRON上一批旧充值地址流出约1599万U。第一反应是：不是被黑，这些是2025年7月那次被盗（约4400万）留下的老钱包，早就不用了。
然后ZachXBT翻链上：其中一个"老"地址，2026年5月还在往他们热钱包归集充值。
一个被盗过的地址，私钥就该默认不归你了。结果快一年过去，还在收用户的钱，还在走归集流程。这叫退役？这叫没人管。
后来口径改了：自动归集服务出故障，钱在旧地址里越堆越多，平台自己吃下损失，用户余额照常。Tether冻了约220万，也就13%出头，剩下的按链上帖子说法已经拆散进了OKX、币安、Gate。
自己兜底这点给分。但顺序很说明问题：先否认，被链上打脸，再报数字。"不是新漏洞"翻译一下就是"旧漏洞一直没补"，这不是更好听，是更难看。
散户能做的就一件事：别把交易所充值地址存进地址簿反复用，每次充值前去App里重新复制。你存的那个地址，后台还有没有人在看，你不知道，有时候他们自己也不知道。
#CoinDCX
CoinDCX，印度最大那家所。10月21日，TRON上一批旧充值地址流出约1599万U。第一反应是：不是被黑，这些是2025年7月那次被盗（约4400万）留下的老钱包，早就不用了。
然后ZachXBT翻链上：其中一个"老"地址，2026年5月还在往他们热钱包归集充值。
一个被盗过的地址，私钥就该默认不归你了。结果快一年过去，还在收用户的钱，还在走归集流程。这叫退役？这叫没人管。
后来口径改了：自动归集服务出故障，钱在旧地址里越堆越多，平台自己吃下损失，用户余额照常。Tether冻了约220万，也就13%出头，剩下的按链上帖子说法已经拆散进了OKX、币安、Gate。
自己兜底这点给分。但顺序很说明问题：先否认，被链上打脸，再报数字。"不是新漏洞"翻译一下就是"旧漏洞一直没补"，这不是更好听，是更难看。
散户能做的就一件事：别把交易所充值地址存进地址簿反复用，每次充值前去App里重新复制。你存的那个地址，后台还有没有人在看，你不知道，有时候他们自己也不知道。
#CoinDCX
450
·
--
Статья
CoinDCX : 16 millions d'USDT perdus sur une vieille adresse. La leçon pour tes dépôtsMariam est couturière à Ouagadougou. Il y a un an, elle a copié l'adresse de dépôt de sa plateforme crypto dans son téléphone, et depuis, elle envoie toujours ses $USDT à cette même adresse, sans revérifier. C'est pratique… jusqu'au jour où l'adresse n'est plus la bonne. Ce qui vient d'arriver en Inde à CoinDCX montre pourquoi ce petit réflexe compte.
📋 Les faits (CoinDesk, 26 octobre 2026)
• CoinDCX, la plus grande plateforme crypto d'Inde en volume, dit avoir absorbé une perte de 15,99 millions d'USDT (environ 16 millions de dollars).
• La semaine dernière, des enquêteurs « on-chain » ont repéré environ 16 millions de dollars de sorties suspectes depuis des portefeuilles liés à la plateforme. Le PDG a d'abord parlé de « fausse alerte ».
• Ces adresses dataient de janvier 2025. Elles avaient été compromises lors du piratage de juillet 2025 (environ 44 millions de dollars de perte à l'époque) puis « retirées » par la plateforme.
• Problème : des utilisateurs ont continué à envoyer des fonds vers ces vieilles adresses. CoinDCX créditait leur compte, puis un service automatique devait déplacer les fonds vers le portefeuille principal. Ce service a cessé de fonctionner pendant une période, et l'argent s'est accumulé sur l'adresse fragile.
• L'enquêteur ZachXBT affirme qu'une de ces adresses servait encore en avril et mai 2026.
• La plateforme assure que les soldes des clients sont intacts et reconnaît qu'elle « aurait pu être plus proactive » dans sa communication.
🧠 Le mécanisme, expliqué simplement
Une plateforme te donne une adresse de dépôt, comme un guichet. Quand elle change de guichet (après un piratage, par exemple), l'ancien reste ouvert dans la blockchain : n'importe qui peut encore y envoyer de l'argent. Si la plateforme ne vide pas ce vieux guichet très vite, l'argent qui y arrive est exposé. Ici, les clients ont été crédités, donc c'est l'entreprise qui a payé la perte. Mais ce n'est pas toujours le cas.
🤔 Pourquoi ça nous concerne ?
1️⃣ Beaucoup d'entre nous déposent par habitude, avec une adresse copiée il y a longtemps, ou partagée par un ami ou un groupe WhatsApp.
2️⃣ Une plateforme peut changer d'adresse sans que tu le remarques, surtout après un incident.
3️⃣ La communication compte : quand une plateforme dit « fausse alerte » puis reconnaît une perte quelques jours plus tard, la confiance prend un coup.
⚖️ La nuance
CoinDCX dit avoir couvert la perte et que les fonds clients sont en sécurité dans des portefeuilles hors ligne. Personne ici n'a perdu son solde, selon l'entreprise. Mais la plateforme n'a pas dit clairement qui a déplacé les fonds ni comment. Et ZachXBT conteste la version officielle. Donc : prudence, sans panique.
🌍 Les bons réflexes pour Mariam (et pour nous)
• Avant chaque dépôt, reprendre l'adresse directement dans l'application de la plateforme. Jamais depuis un vieux message, une capture d'écran ou un groupe.
• Vérifier le réseau (TRC20, BEP20, ERC20…) : une bonne adresse sur le mauvais réseau peut aussi faire perdre les fonds.
• Pour un gros montant, faire d'abord un petit envoi test.
• Lire les annonces de sa plateforme après un incident de sécurité.
• Ne pas laisser sur une plateforme plus que ce qu'on utilise vraiment.
🎯 À retenir
• CoinDCX : 15,99 millions d'USDT perdus sur une vieille adresse « retirée » mais encore utilisée par des clients.
• Une ancienne adresse de dépôt n'est pas fermée : elle reçoit toujours ce qu'on y envoie.
• Toujours copier l'adresse fraîche dans l'appli, au moment du dépôt.
💬 Toi, tu revérifies l'adresse à chaque dépôt, ou tu utilises toujours la même ? Dis-le en commentaire, ça peut aider quelqu'un.
Source : CoinDesk (26/10/2026), billet de blog CoinDCX, déclarations de ZachXBT. Personnage fictif. Pas un conseil financier.
#CryptoAfrique #Sécurité #USDT #CoinDCX
CoinDCX : 16 millions d'USDT perdus sur une vieille adresse. La leçon pour tes dépôts
Mariam est couturière à Ouagadougou. Il y a un an, elle a copié l'adresse de dépôt de sa plateforme crypto dans son téléphone, et depuis, elle envoie toujours ses $USDT à cette même adresse, sans revérifier. C'est pratique… jusqu'au jour où l'adresse n'est plus la bonne. Ce qui vient d'arriver en Inde à CoinDCX montre pourquoi ce petit réflexe compte.
📋 Les faits (CoinDesk, 26 octobre 2026)
• CoinDCX, la plus grande plateforme crypto d'Inde en volume, dit avoir absorbé une perte de 15,99 millions d'USDT (environ 16 millions de dollars).
• La semaine dernière, des enquêteurs « on-chain » ont repéré environ 16 millions de dollars de sorties suspectes depuis des portefeuilles liés à la plateforme. Le PDG a d'abord parlé de « fausse alerte ».
• Ces adresses dataient de janvier 2025. Elles avaient été compromises lors du piratage de juillet 2025 (environ 44 millions de dollars de perte à l'époque) puis « retirées » par la plateforme.
• Problème : des utilisateurs ont continué à envoyer des fonds vers ces vieilles adresses. CoinDCX créditait leur compte, puis un service automatique devait déplacer les fonds vers le portefeuille principal. Ce service a cessé de fonctionner pendant une période, et l'argent s'est accumulé sur l'adresse fragile.
• L'enquêteur ZachXBT affirme qu'une de ces adresses servait encore en avril et mai 2026.
• La plateforme assure que les soldes des clients sont intacts et reconnaît qu'elle « aurait pu être plus proactive » dans sa communication.
🧠 Le mécanisme, expliqué simplement
Une plateforme te donne une adresse de dépôt, comme un guichet. Quand elle change de guichet (après un piratage, par exemple), l'ancien reste ouvert dans la blockchain : n'importe qui peut encore y envoyer de l'argent. Si la plateforme ne vide pas ce vieux guichet très vite, l'argent qui y arrive est exposé. Ici, les clients ont été crédités, donc c'est l'entreprise qui a payé la perte. Mais ce n'est pas toujours le cas.
🤔 Pourquoi ça nous concerne ?
1️⃣ Beaucoup d'entre nous déposent par habitude, avec une adresse copiée il y a longtemps, ou partagée par un ami ou un groupe WhatsApp.
2️⃣ Une plateforme peut changer d'adresse sans que tu le remarques, surtout après un incident.
3️⃣ La communication compte : quand une plateforme dit « fausse alerte » puis reconnaît une perte quelques jours plus tard, la confiance prend un coup.
⚖️ La nuance
CoinDCX dit avoir couvert la perte et que les fonds clients sont en sécurité dans des portefeuilles hors ligne. Personne ici n'a perdu son solde, selon l'entreprise. Mais la plateforme n'a pas dit clairement qui a déplacé les fonds ni comment. Et ZachXBT conteste la version officielle. Donc : prudence, sans panique.
🌍 Les bons réflexes pour Mariam (et pour nous)
• Avant chaque dépôt, reprendre l'adresse directement dans l'application de la plateforme. Jamais depuis un vieux message, une capture d'écran ou un groupe.
• Vérifier le réseau (TRC20, BEP20, ERC20…) : une bonne adresse sur le mauvais réseau peut aussi faire perdre les fonds.
• Pour un gros montant, faire d'abord un petit envoi test.
• Lire les annonces de sa plateforme après un incident de sécurité.
• Ne pas laisser sur une plateforme plus que ce qu'on utilise vraiment.
🎯 À retenir
• CoinDCX : 15,99 millions d'USDT perdus sur une vieille adresse « retirée » mais encore utilisée par des clients.
• Une ancienne adresse de dépôt n'est pas fermée : elle reçoit toujours ce qu'on y envoie.
• Toujours copier l'adresse fraîche dans l'appli, au moment du dépôt.
💬 Toi, tu revérifies l'adresse à chaque dépôt, ou tu utilises toujours la même ? Dis-le en commentaire, ça peut aider quelqu'un.
Source : CoinDesk (26/10/2026), billet de blog CoinDCX, déclarations de ZachXBT. Personnage fictif. Pas un conseil financier.
#CryptoAfrique #Sécurité #USDT #CoinDCX
📋 Les faits (CoinDesk, 26 octobre 2026)
• CoinDCX, la plus grande plateforme crypto d'Inde en volume, dit avoir absorbé une perte de 15,99 millions d'USDT (environ 16 millions de dollars).
• La semaine dernière, des enquêteurs « on-chain » ont repéré environ 16 millions de dollars de sorties suspectes depuis des portefeuilles liés à la plateforme. Le PDG a d'abord parlé de « fausse alerte ».
• Ces adresses dataient de janvier 2025. Elles avaient été compromises lors du piratage de juillet 2025 (environ 44 millions de dollars de perte à l'époque) puis « retirées » par la plateforme.
• Problème : des utilisateurs ont continué à envoyer des fonds vers ces vieilles adresses. CoinDCX créditait leur compte, puis un service automatique devait déplacer les fonds vers le portefeuille principal. Ce service a cessé de fonctionner pendant une période, et l'argent s'est accumulé sur l'adresse fragile.
• L'enquêteur ZachXBT affirme qu'une de ces adresses servait encore en avril et mai 2026.
• La plateforme assure que les soldes des clients sont intacts et reconnaît qu'elle « aurait pu être plus proactive » dans sa communication.
🧠 Le mécanisme, expliqué simplement
Une plateforme te donne une adresse de dépôt, comme un guichet. Quand elle change de guichet (après un piratage, par exemple), l'ancien reste ouvert dans la blockchain : n'importe qui peut encore y envoyer de l'argent. Si la plateforme ne vide pas ce vieux guichet très vite, l'argent qui y arrive est exposé. Ici, les clients ont été crédités, donc c'est l'entreprise qui a payé la perte. Mais ce n'est pas toujours le cas.
🤔 Pourquoi ça nous concerne ?
1️⃣ Beaucoup d'entre nous déposent par habitude, avec une adresse copiée il y a longtemps, ou partagée par un ami ou un groupe WhatsApp.
2️⃣ Une plateforme peut changer d'adresse sans que tu le remarques, surtout après un incident.
3️⃣ La communication compte : quand une plateforme dit « fausse alerte » puis reconnaît une perte quelques jours plus tard, la confiance prend un coup.
⚖️ La nuance
CoinDCX dit avoir couvert la perte et que les fonds clients sont en sécurité dans des portefeuilles hors ligne. Personne ici n'a perdu son solde, selon l'entreprise. Mais la plateforme n'a pas dit clairement qui a déplacé les fonds ni comment. Et ZachXBT conteste la version officielle. Donc : prudence, sans panique.
🌍 Les bons réflexes pour Mariam (et pour nous)
• Avant chaque dépôt, reprendre l'adresse directement dans l'application de la plateforme. Jamais depuis un vieux message, une capture d'écran ou un groupe.
• Vérifier le réseau (TRC20, BEP20, ERC20…) : une bonne adresse sur le mauvais réseau peut aussi faire perdre les fonds.
• Pour un gros montant, faire d'abord un petit envoi test.
• Lire les annonces de sa plateforme après un incident de sécurité.
• Ne pas laisser sur une plateforme plus que ce qu'on utilise vraiment.
🎯 À retenir
• CoinDCX : 15,99 millions d'USDT perdus sur une vieille adresse « retirée » mais encore utilisée par des clients.
• Une ancienne adresse de dépôt n'est pas fermée : elle reçoit toujours ce qu'on y envoie.
• Toujours copier l'adresse fraîche dans l'appli, au moment du dépôt.
💬 Toi, tu revérifies l'adresse à chaque dépôt, ou tu utilises toujours la même ? Dis-le en commentaire, ça peut aider quelqu'un.
Source : CoinDesk (26/10/2026), billet de blog CoinDCX, déclarations de ZachXBT. Personnage fictif. Pas un conseil financier.
#CryptoAfrique #Sécurité #USDT #CoinDCX
101
·
--
🚨 $COINDCX DENIES NEW BREACH, RECALLS JULY 2025 COMPROMISED WALLETS! 📊
📌 CoinDCX’s statement draws a clear line between historic wallet compromise and today’s on‑chain chatter. The compromised addresses, first hit in July 2025, continue to move assets, but the exchange stresses no fresh intrusion into its platform. 🦈 This distinction helps dampen panic‑driven sell pressure that often follows ambiguous blockchain spikes.
🔍 Traders should watch for any liquidity sweeps triggered by these legacy wallets, yet the core risk remains confined to the original breach vector. Maintaining 2FA and regular account audits stays prudent. 💡 How are you adjusting your security posture in light of this clarification? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #COINDCX #Security #Exchange #Crypto
🔥 💎
🚨 $COINDCX DENIES NEW BREACH, RECALLS JULY 2025 COMPROMISED WALLETS! 📊
📌 CoinDCX’s statement draws a clear line between historic wallet compromise and today’s on‑chain chatter. The compromised addresses, first hit in July 2025, continue to move assets, but the exchange stresses no fresh intrusion into its platform. 🦈 This distinction helps dampen panic‑driven sell pressure that often follows ambiguous blockchain spikes.
🔍 Traders should watch for any liquidity sweeps triggered by these legacy wallets, yet the core risk remains confined to the original breach vector. Maintaining 2FA and regular account audits stays prudent. 💡 How are you adjusting your security posture in light of this clarification? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #COINDCX #Security #Exchange #Crypto
🔥 💎
📌 CoinDCX’s statement draws a clear line between historic wallet compromise and today’s on‑chain chatter. The compromised addresses, first hit in July 2025, continue to move assets, but the exchange stresses no fresh intrusion into its platform. 🦈 This distinction helps dampen panic‑driven sell pressure that often follows ambiguous blockchain spikes.
🔍 Traders should watch for any liquidity sweeps triggered by these legacy wallets, yet the core risk remains confined to the original breach vector. Maintaining 2FA and regular account audits stays prudent. 💡 How are you adjusting your security posture in light of this clarification? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #COINDCX #Security #Exchange #Crypto
🔥 💎
2
·
--
CoinDCX confirmó pérdidas que su CEO había minimizado.
La exchange de Mumbai reportó 15.99 millones de USDT drenados de wallets que había retirado tras el hackeo de 44 millones del año pasado.
La suma de ambos golpes ya roza los 60 millones.
Lo llamativo: el CEO había calificado el asunto como falsa alarma días antes.
Y ahora la plataforma absorbe el impacto por su cuenta.
¿Qué te genera más ruido, la cifra o el cambio de versión?
$BTC #CoinDCX #Cripto
CoinDCX confirmó pérdidas que su CEO había minimizado.
La exchange de Mumbai reportó 15.99 millones de USDT drenados de wallets que había retirado tras el hackeo de 44 millones del año pasado.
La suma de ambos golpes ya roza los 60 millones.
Lo llamativo: el CEO había calificado el asunto como falsa alarma días antes.
Y ahora la plataforma absorbe el impacto por su cuenta.
¿Qué te genera más ruido, la cifra o el cambio de versión?
$BTC #CoinDCX #Cripto
La exchange de Mumbai reportó 15.99 millones de USDT drenados de wallets que había retirado tras el hackeo de 44 millones del año pasado.
La suma de ambos golpes ya roza los 60 millones.
Lo llamativo: el CEO había calificado el asunto como falsa alarma días antes.
Y ahora la plataforma absorbe el impacto por su cuenta.
¿Qué te genera más ruido, la cifra o el cambio de versión?
$BTC #CoinDCX #Cripto
15
印度交易所 CoinDCX 已确认损失约 1599 万枚 USDT。问题指向旧钱包存在安全漏洞，攻击者得以转移资产。这再次说明：放在平台的币，并不等于自己掌握私钥；历史钱包、审批流程和冷热钱包隔离都必须定期复审。
后续应重点关注充提恢复进度、用户资产保障说明，以及链上资金追踪情况。普通用户能做的，是避免过度依赖单一托管方、开启提现白名单，并把长期资产转回自托管钱包。安全事故往往不是“是否发生”，而是“何时暴露”。#CoinDCX #加密安全
印度交易所 CoinDCX 已确认损失约 1599 万枚 USDT。问题指向旧钱包存在安全漏洞，攻击者得以转移资产。这再次说明：放在平台的币，并不等于自己掌握私钥；历史钱包、审批流程和冷热钱包隔离都必须定期复审。
后续应重点关注充提恢复进度、用户资产保障说明，以及链上资金追踪情况。普通用户能做的，是避免过度依赖单一托管方、开启提现白名单，并把长期资产转回自托管钱包。安全事故往往不是“是否发生”，而是“何时暴露”。#CoinDCX #加密安全
后续应重点关注充提恢复进度、用户资产保障说明，以及链上资金追踪情况。普通用户能做的，是避免过度依赖单一托管方、开启提现白名单，并把长期资产转回自托管钱包。安全事故往往不是“是否发生”，而是“何时暴露”。#CoinDCX #加密安全
Войдите, чтобы посмотреть больше материала
Присоединяйтесь к пользователям криптовалют по всему миру на Binance Square
⚡️ Получайте новейшую и полезную информацию о криптоактивах.
💬 Нам доверяет крупнейшая в мире криптобиржа.
👍 Получите достоверные аналитические данные от верифицированных создателей контента.
Эл. почта/номер телефона
В тренде
1
#BinancePick
Просмотров: 3.1M
152,840 обсуждают
2
#EarningsSeason
Просмотров: 5.3M
26,001 обсуждают
3
#AnthropicTTMRevenueGrewAbout1200%
Просмотров: 29,072
422 обсуждают
4
#AnthropicS1ExpectedToday
Просмотров: 25,714
348 обсуждают
5
#SouthKoreaReportedlyWeighsFourthCryptoTaxDelay
Просмотров: 30,183
472 обсуждают
6
#FranklinTempletonFilesForTwoDividendToBitcoinETFs
Просмотров: 39,779
541 обсуждают
7
#StrategyMSTRSurpassesNasdaqInMarketCap
Просмотров: 30,172
386 обсуждают
8
#CanadaProposesStablecoinRedemptionWithin3BusinessDays
Просмотров: 1,320
36 обсуждают
9
#ElectrumWalletBugLetRogueServersStealFunds
Просмотров: 30,934
463 обсуждают
10
#ArgentineCourtDismissesLIBRACaseAgainstMilei
Просмотров: 46,326
582 обсуждают