Crypto Breaking
18.4k Publications
Crypto Breaking
Compte Square Vérifié+Signaler
Bloquer l’utilisateur
Get real-time cryptocurrency news, blockchain updates, market analysis, and expert insights. Explore the latest trends in Bitcoin, Ethereum, DeFi, and Web3.
5 Suivis
32.8K+ Abonnés
31.5K+ J’aime
Publications
Tous
Citations
Article
Voir la traduction
MiCA Licensing Marks Start as Crypto Custodians Come Under ScrutinyEU regulators are moving beyond the “license first” phase of crypto oversight and turning their attention to whether custodians can actually operate safely under stress. On Wednesday, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) launched a Common Supervisory Action (CSA) focused on the operational resilience of crypto asset service providers (CASPs), with custody services at the center of the review.
The initiative arrives soon after MiCA’s transitional period ended, marking one of the first large supervisory exercises under the EU’s new crypto rulebook. ESMA says it will examine a sample of MiCA-authorized CASPs and evaluate how mature their digital operational resilience frameworks are for custody-related activities.
Key takeaways
ESMA’s Common Supervisory Action targets operational resilience for custody services, shifting scrutiny from authorization to day-to-day risk controls.
The review will examine areas such as key and storage management, transaction controls, incident response, and reliance on third parties.
Industry executives say institutional clients are already pressing custodians for detailed evidence around segregation, access controls, and business continuity.
Legal experts note the assessment intersects with both MiCA custody obligations and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) technology risk framework.
ESMA’s findings could influence broader EU debates about how CASPs should be supervised, including potential centralization at EU level.
ESMA’s supervisory action shifts the focus to operational proof
ESMA’s CSA will apply to a selected set of authorized CASPs under MiCA. Rather than treating licensing as a compliance endpoint, ESMA’s stated goal is to assess the maturity of firms’ operational resilience frameworks specifically for custody activities.
According to ESMA, the evaluation will cover multiple risk domains: key and storage management practices, transaction control mechanisms, how firms respond to incidents, and how they manage dependencies on third-party providers. This is important because custody failures are not only a legal breach—they can quickly translate into direct operational disruption and, potentially, loss of control over customer assets.
Speaking to Cointelegraph, Sebastien Dessimoz, co-founder and managing partner at digital asset infrastructure firm Taurus, characterized the message as clear: “for custodians, a licence is the start line, not the finish.” He argued the move is constructive, reflecting how digital assets are integrating deeper into regulated financial infrastructure and therefore should meet the same resilience and accountability expectations as in traditional markets.
That emphasis on evidence is also resonating with institutions. Jody Mettler, chief operating officer of BitGo and president of BitGo Trust, told Cointelegraph that institutional clients are already asking more granular questions about custody operations—particularly how segregated assets are handled, how access controls work, what happens during incidents, and whether business continuity plans remain effective when markets are under pressure.
Two operational tests: MiCA authorization and resilience under real-world conditions
For market participants, the ESMA move underscores that MiCA authorization and operational resilience are not interchangeable. Markus Levin, co-founder of blockchain infrastructure company XYO, framed it as “two different tests,” adding that custodians capable of demonstrating robust controls before ESMA completes its review could be positioned to benefit as institutional adoption grows.
That distinction matters because it changes what “good compliance” looks like in practice. Licensing under MiCA may indicate that a firm has met baseline regulatory requirements, but operational resilience assessments require ongoing demonstration: how controls function in practice, how quickly incidents are detected and addressed, and whether third-party arrangements introduce systemic weakness.
In other words, ESMA’s CSA effectively raises the bar from formal compliance to operational credibility—an approach that can also reduce informational asymmetry between regulators, clients, and custodians about how well safeguards hold up when conditions deteriorate.
MiCA meets DORA: supply-chain risk and the challenge of concentrated custody tech
Legal analysis from Digital & Analogue Partners highlights why this particular CSA may be more complex than earlier supervisory activities. Yuriy Brisov, a lawyer at the firm, said the review sits at the intersection of two EU regulatory frameworks: MiCA, which establishes obligations for custody services, and DORA, which sets technology risk requirements for financial entities.
Brisov pointed to an industry reality that could complicate supervision: custody technology is concentrated among a small number of vendors. As a result, a single weak supplier can affect multiple custodians at once, making resilience not just a firm-level property but also a supply-chain question.
In that context, Brisov argued that proving resilience across the full supply chain under both MiCA and DORA simultaneously is the “real challenge for CASPs.” The practical implication for custodians is that they may need to show more than internal policies—they may also need to demonstrate that outsourced components and vendor dependencies are managed with sufficient depth, monitoring, and contingency planning.
ESMA’s approach could also set a benchmark for future supervisory expectations. Brisov suggested the CSA’s outcomes may inform how regulators evaluate MiCA-authorized custodians and feed into broader discussions about whether crypto supervision in the EU should become more centralized.
Why this CSA could shape the next phase of EU crypto supervision
Beyond the immediate assessment of participating CASPs, the CSA is positioned within ongoing EU policy debates. Brisov said the results could influence two active areas: the ongoing review of MiCA itself, and a proposal to shift supervision of all CASPs from national regulators to ESMA.
This matters to investors and clients because supervisory consistency is often critical when risk is cross-border and operational systems rely on similar technology stacks. If the EU moves toward more centralized oversight, firms may need to align their resilience reporting and control structures to a harmonized standard—making early preparation potentially advantageous.
At the same time, uncertainty remains about how ESMA will translate CSA findings into concrete regulatory expectations. The CSA is an assessment exercise, but its conclusions could later affect supervisory intensity, remediation requirements, or how firms design controls for key management, transaction operations, and incident handling.
For now, ESMA’s message to the custody market is straightforward: MiCA authorization is not the finish line. CASPs should watch what ESMA emphasizes in its resilience findings—especially around third-party dependencies and operational processes under stress—because those themes are likely to define what “acceptable” looks like in the next round of EU crypto supervision.
This article was originally published as MiCA Licensing Marks Start as Crypto Custodians Come Under Scrutiny on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
MiCA Licensing Marks Start as Crypto Custodians Come Under Scrutiny
EU regulators are moving beyond the “license first” phase of crypto oversight and turning their attention to whether custodians can actually operate safely under stress. On Wednesday, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) launched a Common Supervisory Action (CSA) focused on the operational resilience of crypto asset service providers (CASPs), with custody services at the center of the review.
The initiative arrives soon after MiCA’s transitional period ended, marking one of the first large supervisory exercises under the EU’s new crypto rulebook. ESMA says it will examine a sample of MiCA-authorized CASPs and evaluate how mature their digital operational resilience frameworks are for custody-related activities.
Key takeaways
ESMA’s Common Supervisory Action targets operational resilience for custody services, shifting scrutiny from authorization to day-to-day risk controls.
The review will examine areas such as key and storage management, transaction controls, incident response, and reliance on third parties.
Industry executives say institutional clients are already pressing custodians for detailed evidence around segregation, access controls, and business continuity.
Legal experts note the assessment intersects with both MiCA custody obligations and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) technology risk framework.
ESMA’s findings could influence broader EU debates about how CASPs should be supervised, including potential centralization at EU level.
ESMA’s supervisory action shifts the focus to operational proof
ESMA’s CSA will apply to a selected set of authorized CASPs under MiCA. Rather than treating licensing as a compliance endpoint, ESMA’s stated goal is to assess the maturity of firms’ operational resilience frameworks specifically for custody activities.
According to ESMA, the evaluation will cover multiple risk domains: key and storage management practices, transaction control mechanisms, how firms respond to incidents, and how they manage dependencies on third-party providers. This is important because custody failures are not only a legal breach—they can quickly translate into direct operational disruption and, potentially, loss of control over customer assets.
Speaking to Cointelegraph, Sebastien Dessimoz, co-founder and managing partner at digital asset infrastructure firm Taurus, characterized the message as clear: “for custodians, a licence is the start line, not the finish.” He argued the move is constructive, reflecting how digital assets are integrating deeper into regulated financial infrastructure and therefore should meet the same resilience and accountability expectations as in traditional markets.
That emphasis on evidence is also resonating with institutions. Jody Mettler, chief operating officer of BitGo and president of BitGo Trust, told Cointelegraph that institutional clients are already asking more granular questions about custody operations—particularly how segregated assets are handled, how access controls work, what happens during incidents, and whether business continuity plans remain effective when markets are under pressure.
Two operational tests: MiCA authorization and resilience under real-world conditions
For market participants, the ESMA move underscores that MiCA authorization and operational resilience are not interchangeable. Markus Levin, co-founder of blockchain infrastructure company XYO, framed it as “two different tests,” adding that custodians capable of demonstrating robust controls before ESMA completes its review could be positioned to benefit as institutional adoption grows.
That distinction matters because it changes what “good compliance” looks like in practice. Licensing under MiCA may indicate that a firm has met baseline regulatory requirements, but operational resilience assessments require ongoing demonstration: how controls function in practice, how quickly incidents are detected and addressed, and whether third-party arrangements introduce systemic weakness.
In other words, ESMA’s CSA effectively raises the bar from formal compliance to operational credibility—an approach that can also reduce informational asymmetry between regulators, clients, and custodians about how well safeguards hold up when conditions deteriorate.
MiCA meets DORA: supply-chain risk and the challenge of concentrated custody tech
Legal analysis from Digital & Analogue Partners highlights why this particular CSA may be more complex than earlier supervisory activities. Yuriy Brisov, a lawyer at the firm, said the review sits at the intersection of two EU regulatory frameworks: MiCA, which establishes obligations for custody services, and DORA, which sets technology risk requirements for financial entities.
Brisov pointed to an industry reality that could complicate supervision: custody technology is concentrated among a small number of vendors. As a result, a single weak supplier can affect multiple custodians at once, making resilience not just a firm-level property but also a supply-chain question.
In that context, Brisov argued that proving resilience across the full supply chain under both MiCA and DORA simultaneously is the “real challenge for CASPs.” The practical implication for custodians is that they may need to show more than internal policies—they may also need to demonstrate that outsourced components and vendor dependencies are managed with sufficient depth, monitoring, and contingency planning.
ESMA’s approach could also set a benchmark for future supervisory expectations. Brisov suggested the CSA’s outcomes may inform how regulators evaluate MiCA-authorized custodians and feed into broader discussions about whether crypto supervision in the EU should become more centralized.
Why this CSA could shape the next phase of EU crypto supervision
Beyond the immediate assessment of participating CASPs, the CSA is positioned within ongoing EU policy debates. Brisov said the results could influence two active areas: the ongoing review of MiCA itself, and a proposal to shift supervision of all CASPs from national regulators to ESMA.
This matters to investors and clients because supervisory consistency is often critical when risk is cross-border and operational systems rely on similar technology stacks. If the EU moves toward more centralized oversight, firms may need to align their resilience reporting and control structures to a harmonized standard—making early preparation potentially advantageous.
At the same time, uncertainty remains about how ESMA will translate CSA findings into concrete regulatory expectations. The CSA is an assessment exercise, but its conclusions could later affect supervisory intensity, remediation requirements, or how firms design controls for key management, transaction operations, and incident handling.
For now, ESMA’s message to the custody market is straightforward: MiCA authorization is not the finish line. CASPs should watch what ESMA emphasizes in its resilience findings—especially around third-party dependencies and operational processes under stress—because those themes are likely to define what “acceptable” looks like in the next round of EU crypto supervision.
This article was originally published as MiCA Licensing Marks Start as Crypto Custodians Come Under Scrutiny on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
The initiative arrives soon after MiCA’s transitional period ended, marking one of the first large supervisory exercises under the EU’s new crypto rulebook. ESMA says it will examine a sample of MiCA-authorized CASPs and evaluate how mature their digital operational resilience frameworks are for custody-related activities.
Key takeaways
ESMA’s Common Supervisory Action targets operational resilience for custody services, shifting scrutiny from authorization to day-to-day risk controls.
The review will examine areas such as key and storage management, transaction controls, incident response, and reliance on third parties.
Industry executives say institutional clients are already pressing custodians for detailed evidence around segregation, access controls, and business continuity.
Legal experts note the assessment intersects with both MiCA custody obligations and the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) technology risk framework.
ESMA’s findings could influence broader EU debates about how CASPs should be supervised, including potential centralization at EU level.
ESMA’s supervisory action shifts the focus to operational proof
ESMA’s CSA will apply to a selected set of authorized CASPs under MiCA. Rather than treating licensing as a compliance endpoint, ESMA’s stated goal is to assess the maturity of firms’ operational resilience frameworks specifically for custody activities.
According to ESMA, the evaluation will cover multiple risk domains: key and storage management practices, transaction control mechanisms, how firms respond to incidents, and how they manage dependencies on third-party providers. This is important because custody failures are not only a legal breach—they can quickly translate into direct operational disruption and, potentially, loss of control over customer assets.
Speaking to Cointelegraph, Sebastien Dessimoz, co-founder and managing partner at digital asset infrastructure firm Taurus, characterized the message as clear: “for custodians, a licence is the start line, not the finish.” He argued the move is constructive, reflecting how digital assets are integrating deeper into regulated financial infrastructure and therefore should meet the same resilience and accountability expectations as in traditional markets.
That emphasis on evidence is also resonating with institutions. Jody Mettler, chief operating officer of BitGo and president of BitGo Trust, told Cointelegraph that institutional clients are already asking more granular questions about custody operations—particularly how segregated assets are handled, how access controls work, what happens during incidents, and whether business continuity plans remain effective when markets are under pressure.
Two operational tests: MiCA authorization and resilience under real-world conditions
For market participants, the ESMA move underscores that MiCA authorization and operational resilience are not interchangeable. Markus Levin, co-founder of blockchain infrastructure company XYO, framed it as “two different tests,” adding that custodians capable of demonstrating robust controls before ESMA completes its review could be positioned to benefit as institutional adoption grows.
That distinction matters because it changes what “good compliance” looks like in practice. Licensing under MiCA may indicate that a firm has met baseline regulatory requirements, but operational resilience assessments require ongoing demonstration: how controls function in practice, how quickly incidents are detected and addressed, and whether third-party arrangements introduce systemic weakness.
In other words, ESMA’s CSA effectively raises the bar from formal compliance to operational credibility—an approach that can also reduce informational asymmetry between regulators, clients, and custodians about how well safeguards hold up when conditions deteriorate.
MiCA meets DORA: supply-chain risk and the challenge of concentrated custody tech
Legal analysis from Digital & Analogue Partners highlights why this particular CSA may be more complex than earlier supervisory activities. Yuriy Brisov, a lawyer at the firm, said the review sits at the intersection of two EU regulatory frameworks: MiCA, which establishes obligations for custody services, and DORA, which sets technology risk requirements for financial entities.
Brisov pointed to an industry reality that could complicate supervision: custody technology is concentrated among a small number of vendors. As a result, a single weak supplier can affect multiple custodians at once, making resilience not just a firm-level property but also a supply-chain question.
In that context, Brisov argued that proving resilience across the full supply chain under both MiCA and DORA simultaneously is the “real challenge for CASPs.” The practical implication for custodians is that they may need to show more than internal policies—they may also need to demonstrate that outsourced components and vendor dependencies are managed with sufficient depth, monitoring, and contingency planning.
ESMA’s approach could also set a benchmark for future supervisory expectations. Brisov suggested the CSA’s outcomes may inform how regulators evaluate MiCA-authorized custodians and feed into broader discussions about whether crypto supervision in the EU should become more centralized.
Why this CSA could shape the next phase of EU crypto supervision
Beyond the immediate assessment of participating CASPs, the CSA is positioned within ongoing EU policy debates. Brisov said the results could influence two active areas: the ongoing review of MiCA itself, and a proposal to shift supervision of all CASPs from national regulators to ESMA.
This matters to investors and clients because supervisory consistency is often critical when risk is cross-border and operational systems rely on similar technology stacks. If the EU moves toward more centralized oversight, firms may need to align their resilience reporting and control structures to a harmonized standard—making early preparation potentially advantageous.
At the same time, uncertainty remains about how ESMA will translate CSA findings into concrete regulatory expectations. The CSA is an assessment exercise, but its conclusions could later affect supervisory intensity, remediation requirements, or how firms design controls for key management, transaction operations, and incident handling.
For now, ESMA’s message to the custody market is straightforward: MiCA authorization is not the finish line. CASPs should watch what ESMA emphasizes in its resilience findings—especially around third-party dependencies and operational processes under stress—because those themes are likely to define what “acceptable” looks like in the next round of EU crypto supervision.
This article was originally published as MiCA Licensing Marks Start as Crypto Custodians Come Under Scrutiny on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
10
Article
Voir la traduction
Senate Democrats Seek Trump Crypto Hearings Before Clarity Act ReleaseSenate Democrats renewed calls for hearings into President Donald Trump’s crypto income and business ties before a legislative release. Five ranking members said disclosures raised national security, ethics, and conflict concerns involving the president’s family ventures. Their demand adds pressure to CLARITY Act negotiations, which could produce a Senate draft next week.
Democrats Seek Hearings Across Five Committees
Senators Elizabeth Warren, Richard Blumenthal, Gary Peters, Dick Durbin, and Ron Wyden asked chairs to schedule hearings. Each serves as ranking Democrat on a committee overseeing finance, security, justice, investigations, or taxation. They want officials to explain the structure, ownership, and foreign links surrounding Trump’s crypto businesses.
The lawmakers focused on World Liberty Financial, which Trump established with his sons and partners. They cited unclear outside ownership interests and questioned whether foreign participants could gain influence through financial ties. Their request also linked those concerns to decisions involving regulation, enforcement, and national security policy.
The senators previously sought scrutiny of a foreign investment involving World Liberty Financial and Trump-linked entities. They argued that Congress should examine whether financial relationships affected later administration decisions involving the same foreign government. However, the White House has rejected conflict claims and maintained that Trump acts for the public interest.
Financial Disclosures Put Crypto Income at Center
Trump reported more than $1.4 billion from family crypto ventures during 2025, according to his annual disclosure. Nearly $800 million came from World Liberty Financial, including token sales and transactions involving company ownership interests. The filing also listed about $635 million connected to sales of the Trump-branded meme coin.
Those figures made digital assets the largest reported source of Trump’s income during the year. His golf, resort, licensing, settlement, and property businesses produced substantial revenue, but crypto delivered the biggest total. The disclosure intensified questions about how federal policy could affect businesses that benefit the president and his family.
Trump has said his children manage the business interests, and outside funds handle his personal finances. Meanwhile, the White House has denied that the president or his family engaged in conflicts of interest. Still, Democrats argue that current arrangements do not remove financial benefits flowing to Trump-controlled trusts and related entities.
Ethics Dispute Complicates Clarity Act Talks
The CLARITY Act would divide digital asset oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It would establish rules for token disclosures, trading platforms, decentralized finance, customer assets, and illicit finance controls. The House passed its version in 2025, while Senate committees developed separate proposals during 2026.
The Senate Banking Committee advanced its market structure text in May, then began reconciling it with Agriculture Committee legislation. A combined draft could emerge next week, although disagreements remain over enforcement, agency leadership, and official financial interests. Any Senate measure would require reconciliation with the House bill before reaching the president.
Warren wants the legislation to restrict crypto profits for presidents, vice presidents, lawmakers, senior officials, and their immediate families. Other Democrats have tied their support to a strong ethics provision covering political figures and related business ventures. Without such language, the dispute could threaten bipartisan backing and delay the broader market structure package.
This article was originally published as Senate Democrats Seek Trump Crypto Hearings Before Clarity Act Release on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
Senate Democrats Seek Trump Crypto Hearings Before Clarity Act Release
Senate Democrats renewed calls for hearings into President Donald Trump’s crypto income and business ties before a legislative release. Five ranking members said disclosures raised national security, ethics, and conflict concerns involving the president’s family ventures. Their demand adds pressure to CLARITY Act negotiations, which could produce a Senate draft next week.
Democrats Seek Hearings Across Five Committees
Senators Elizabeth Warren, Richard Blumenthal, Gary Peters, Dick Durbin, and Ron Wyden asked chairs to schedule hearings. Each serves as ranking Democrat on a committee overseeing finance, security, justice, investigations, or taxation. They want officials to explain the structure, ownership, and foreign links surrounding Trump’s crypto businesses.
The lawmakers focused on World Liberty Financial, which Trump established with his sons and partners. They cited unclear outside ownership interests and questioned whether foreign participants could gain influence through financial ties. Their request also linked those concerns to decisions involving regulation, enforcement, and national security policy.
The senators previously sought scrutiny of a foreign investment involving World Liberty Financial and Trump-linked entities. They argued that Congress should examine whether financial relationships affected later administration decisions involving the same foreign government. However, the White House has rejected conflict claims and maintained that Trump acts for the public interest.
Financial Disclosures Put Crypto Income at Center
Trump reported more than $1.4 billion from family crypto ventures during 2025, according to his annual disclosure. Nearly $800 million came from World Liberty Financial, including token sales and transactions involving company ownership interests. The filing also listed about $635 million connected to sales of the Trump-branded meme coin.
Those figures made digital assets the largest reported source of Trump’s income during the year. His golf, resort, licensing, settlement, and property businesses produced substantial revenue, but crypto delivered the biggest total. The disclosure intensified questions about how federal policy could affect businesses that benefit the president and his family.
Trump has said his children manage the business interests, and outside funds handle his personal finances. Meanwhile, the White House has denied that the president or his family engaged in conflicts of interest. Still, Democrats argue that current arrangements do not remove financial benefits flowing to Trump-controlled trusts and related entities.
Ethics Dispute Complicates Clarity Act Talks
The CLARITY Act would divide digital asset oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It would establish rules for token disclosures, trading platforms, decentralized finance, customer assets, and illicit finance controls. The House passed its version in 2025, while Senate committees developed separate proposals during 2026.
The Senate Banking Committee advanced its market structure text in May, then began reconciling it with Agriculture Committee legislation. A combined draft could emerge next week, although disagreements remain over enforcement, agency leadership, and official financial interests. Any Senate measure would require reconciliation with the House bill before reaching the president.
Warren wants the legislation to restrict crypto profits for presidents, vice presidents, lawmakers, senior officials, and their immediate families. Other Democrats have tied their support to a strong ethics provision covering political figures and related business ventures. Without such language, the dispute could threaten bipartisan backing and delay the broader market structure package.
This article was originally published as Senate Democrats Seek Trump Crypto Hearings Before Clarity Act Release on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
Democrats Seek Hearings Across Five Committees
Senators Elizabeth Warren, Richard Blumenthal, Gary Peters, Dick Durbin, and Ron Wyden asked chairs to schedule hearings. Each serves as ranking Democrat on a committee overseeing finance, security, justice, investigations, or taxation. They want officials to explain the structure, ownership, and foreign links surrounding Trump’s crypto businesses.
The lawmakers focused on World Liberty Financial, which Trump established with his sons and partners. They cited unclear outside ownership interests and questioned whether foreign participants could gain influence through financial ties. Their request also linked those concerns to decisions involving regulation, enforcement, and national security policy.
The senators previously sought scrutiny of a foreign investment involving World Liberty Financial and Trump-linked entities. They argued that Congress should examine whether financial relationships affected later administration decisions involving the same foreign government. However, the White House has rejected conflict claims and maintained that Trump acts for the public interest.
Financial Disclosures Put Crypto Income at Center
Trump reported more than $1.4 billion from family crypto ventures during 2025, according to his annual disclosure. Nearly $800 million came from World Liberty Financial, including token sales and transactions involving company ownership interests. The filing also listed about $635 million connected to sales of the Trump-branded meme coin.
Those figures made digital assets the largest reported source of Trump’s income during the year. His golf, resort, licensing, settlement, and property businesses produced substantial revenue, but crypto delivered the biggest total. The disclosure intensified questions about how federal policy could affect businesses that benefit the president and his family.
Trump has said his children manage the business interests, and outside funds handle his personal finances. Meanwhile, the White House has denied that the president or his family engaged in conflicts of interest. Still, Democrats argue that current arrangements do not remove financial benefits flowing to Trump-controlled trusts and related entities.
Ethics Dispute Complicates Clarity Act Talks
The CLARITY Act would divide digital asset oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It would establish rules for token disclosures, trading platforms, decentralized finance, customer assets, and illicit finance controls. The House passed its version in 2025, while Senate committees developed separate proposals during 2026.
The Senate Banking Committee advanced its market structure text in May, then began reconciling it with Agriculture Committee legislation. A combined draft could emerge next week, although disagreements remain over enforcement, agency leadership, and official financial interests. Any Senate measure would require reconciliation with the House bill before reaching the president.
Warren wants the legislation to restrict crypto profits for presidents, vice presidents, lawmakers, senior officials, and their immediate families. Other Democrats have tied their support to a strong ethics provision covering political figures and related business ventures. Without such language, the dispute could threaten bipartisan backing and delay the broader market structure package.
This article was originally published as Senate Democrats Seek Trump Crypto Hearings Before Clarity Act Release on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
40
Article
Les indicateurs de l’écosystème Solana s’améliorent dans un contexte d’activité réseau pour favoriser la formation d’un redressementL’écosystème Solana continue de s’améliorer en termes de performance, soutenu par un volume de transactions élevé, des revenus d’applications décentralisées et le nombre croissant d’actifs tokenisés. Même si SOL a connu des fluctuations de prix, les indicateurs de la blockchain suggèrent que l’écosystème attire des utilisateurs et des investisseurs.
De récentes statistiques réseau montrent que Solana affiche l’un des niveaux les plus élevés d’activité blockchain parmi les autres blockchains. Dans le même temps, des signaux techniques indiquent que les acheteurs tentent de former un rebond à court terme.
Les indicateurs de l’écosystème Solana s’améliorent dans un contexte d’activité réseau pour favoriser la formation d’un redressement
L’écosystème Solana continue de s’améliorer en termes de performance, soutenu par un volume de transactions élevé, des revenus d’applications décentralisées et le nombre croissant d’actifs tokenisés. Même si SOL a connu des fluctuations de prix, les indicateurs de la blockchain suggèrent que l’écosystème attire des utilisateurs et des investisseurs.
De récentes statistiques réseau montrent que Solana affiche l’un des niveaux les plus élevés d’activité blockchain parmi les autres blockchains. Dans le même temps, des signaux techniques indiquent que les acheteurs tentent de former un rebond à court terme.
De récentes statistiques réseau montrent que Solana affiche l’un des niveaux les plus élevés d’activité blockchain parmi les autres blockchains. Dans le même temps, des signaux techniques indiquent que les acheteurs tentent de former un rebond à court terme.
38
Article
Voir la traduction
New Hampshire Council Rejects $100M Bitcoin Bond ProposalNew Hampshire’s executive council has rejected a proposal that would have allowed the state to issue $100 million in bonds backed by Bitcoin, dealing a setback to plans that would have extended the state’s embrace of digital-asset finance.
During a Wednesday hearing, the five-member panel voted 3-2 against the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority’s (BFA) request to issue BTC-backed bonds. The BFA had approved the issuance in November 2025, and the measure also had support from Governor Kelly Ayotte.
Key takeaways
The executive council voted 3-2 to block New Hampshire’s proposed $100 million Bitcoin-collateralized bond issuance.
CleanSpark was named as the entity providing Bitcoin collateral for the proposed vehicles issued by the BFA.
The decision follows New Hampshire’s May 2025 crypto reserve law, which set the stage for further state-level digital asset policy.
Moody’s assigned the proposed Bitcoin bond a provisional Ba2 rating in March, according to prior coverage.
Public debate included warnings from experts about risk to residents, even as parts of the crypto industry supported the concept.
Executive council vote stops BTC-collateralized bond plan
The rejection came after a split decision among councilors. According to the vote record, councilors Karen Liot Hill, Dave Wheeler, and Janet Stevens voted against the measure. Joseph Kenney and John Stephen voted in favor.
In the aftermath, state representative Keith Ammon criticized the outcome in a post on X, saying the decision was “extremely short-sighted” and urging the panel to “gather all relevant facts and information and reconsider their vote at a future meeting.”
Why New Hampshire’s crypto finance experiment mattered
The BTC-backed bonds were designed to be issued by the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, with Bitcoin placed as collateral through CleanSpark. If approved, the proposal would have represented another step in New Hampshire’s evolving posture toward cryptocurrency after the state passed a crypto reserve law in May 2025.
Supporters in the broader crypto community had argued that Bitcoin-backed instruments could help mainstream digital asset exposure into traditional financial structures. However, opposition reflected concerns that such products may introduce risks that are difficult for retail and local stakeholders to evaluate—particularly in a vehicle intended to function like municipal-style financing.
Risk concerns and Moody’s provisional rating
Not all market participants viewed the plan as straightforward. Some experts warned against the proposal, describing it as carrying “substantial risk” for New Hampshire residents. Their objections centered on the potential volatility and custody-related complexities of using Bitcoin as collateral for public finance-style instruments.
Prior reporting also noted that Moody’s assigned the Bitcoin bond a provisional Ba2 rating in March, underscoring that the credit assessment—while not final—still considered meaningful risk factors. That provisional rating added another layer to the debate: even with an external rating process underway, the executive council ultimately concluded that the plan should not move forward at this time.
What happens next for digital asset policy in New Hampshire
With the council vote going against the issuance, New Hampshire’s near-term path to using Bitcoin within state-backed financial tools appears to narrow. The move also signals that political and regulatory appetite for crypto-linked public finance may vary sharply even when a state’s leadership has already supported broader crypto legislation.
For builders and investors tracking the state as a potential “proof of concept” location, the rejection is a reminder that approval for crypto-adjacent instruments depends not only on legislative frameworks, but also on executive-level risk decisions and the way collateral arrangements are perceived in practice.
Readers should watch whether the BFA revisits the structure of the proposed BTC-backed vehicles, seeks a revised vote, or instead shifts toward other compliance-forward approaches that align with both the state’s crypto reserve direction and the council’s risk concerns; the council’s split decision suggests that future proposals could still find a narrow path to approval if they address those objections directly.
This article was originally published as New Hampshire Council Rejects $100M Bitcoin Bond Proposal on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
New Hampshire Council Rejects $100M Bitcoin Bond Proposal
New Hampshire’s executive council has rejected a proposal that would have allowed the state to issue $100 million in bonds backed by Bitcoin, dealing a setback to plans that would have extended the state’s embrace of digital-asset finance.
During a Wednesday hearing, the five-member panel voted 3-2 against the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority’s (BFA) request to issue BTC-backed bonds. The BFA had approved the issuance in November 2025, and the measure also had support from Governor Kelly Ayotte.
Key takeaways
The executive council voted 3-2 to block New Hampshire’s proposed $100 million Bitcoin-collateralized bond issuance.
CleanSpark was named as the entity providing Bitcoin collateral for the proposed vehicles issued by the BFA.
The decision follows New Hampshire’s May 2025 crypto reserve law, which set the stage for further state-level digital asset policy.
Moody’s assigned the proposed Bitcoin bond a provisional Ba2 rating in March, according to prior coverage.
Public debate included warnings from experts about risk to residents, even as parts of the crypto industry supported the concept.
Executive council vote stops BTC-collateralized bond plan
The rejection came after a split decision among councilors. According to the vote record, councilors Karen Liot Hill, Dave Wheeler, and Janet Stevens voted against the measure. Joseph Kenney and John Stephen voted in favor.
In the aftermath, state representative Keith Ammon criticized the outcome in a post on X, saying the decision was “extremely short-sighted” and urging the panel to “gather all relevant facts and information and reconsider their vote at a future meeting.”
Why New Hampshire’s crypto finance experiment mattered
The BTC-backed bonds were designed to be issued by the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, with Bitcoin placed as collateral through CleanSpark. If approved, the proposal would have represented another step in New Hampshire’s evolving posture toward cryptocurrency after the state passed a crypto reserve law in May 2025.
Supporters in the broader crypto community had argued that Bitcoin-backed instruments could help mainstream digital asset exposure into traditional financial structures. However, opposition reflected concerns that such products may introduce risks that are difficult for retail and local stakeholders to evaluate—particularly in a vehicle intended to function like municipal-style financing.
Risk concerns and Moody’s provisional rating
Not all market participants viewed the plan as straightforward. Some experts warned against the proposal, describing it as carrying “substantial risk” for New Hampshire residents. Their objections centered on the potential volatility and custody-related complexities of using Bitcoin as collateral for public finance-style instruments.
Prior reporting also noted that Moody’s assigned the Bitcoin bond a provisional Ba2 rating in March, underscoring that the credit assessment—while not final—still considered meaningful risk factors. That provisional rating added another layer to the debate: even with an external rating process underway, the executive council ultimately concluded that the plan should not move forward at this time.
What happens next for digital asset policy in New Hampshire
With the council vote going against the issuance, New Hampshire’s near-term path to using Bitcoin within state-backed financial tools appears to narrow. The move also signals that political and regulatory appetite for crypto-linked public finance may vary sharply even when a state’s leadership has already supported broader crypto legislation.
For builders and investors tracking the state as a potential “proof of concept” location, the rejection is a reminder that approval for crypto-adjacent instruments depends not only on legislative frameworks, but also on executive-level risk decisions and the way collateral arrangements are perceived in practice.
Readers should watch whether the BFA revisits the structure of the proposed BTC-backed vehicles, seeks a revised vote, or instead shifts toward other compliance-forward approaches that align with both the state’s crypto reserve direction and the council’s risk concerns; the council’s split decision suggests that future proposals could still find a narrow path to approval if they address those objections directly.
This article was originally published as New Hampshire Council Rejects $100M Bitcoin Bond Proposal on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
During a Wednesday hearing, the five-member panel voted 3-2 against the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority’s (BFA) request to issue BTC-backed bonds. The BFA had approved the issuance in November 2025, and the measure also had support from Governor Kelly Ayotte.
Key takeaways
The executive council voted 3-2 to block New Hampshire’s proposed $100 million Bitcoin-collateralized bond issuance.
CleanSpark was named as the entity providing Bitcoin collateral for the proposed vehicles issued by the BFA.
The decision follows New Hampshire’s May 2025 crypto reserve law, which set the stage for further state-level digital asset policy.
Moody’s assigned the proposed Bitcoin bond a provisional Ba2 rating in March, according to prior coverage.
Public debate included warnings from experts about risk to residents, even as parts of the crypto industry supported the concept.
Executive council vote stops BTC-collateralized bond plan
The rejection came after a split decision among councilors. According to the vote record, councilors Karen Liot Hill, Dave Wheeler, and Janet Stevens voted against the measure. Joseph Kenney and John Stephen voted in favor.
In the aftermath, state representative Keith Ammon criticized the outcome in a post on X, saying the decision was “extremely short-sighted” and urging the panel to “gather all relevant facts and information and reconsider their vote at a future meeting.”
Why New Hampshire’s crypto finance experiment mattered
The BTC-backed bonds were designed to be issued by the New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, with Bitcoin placed as collateral through CleanSpark. If approved, the proposal would have represented another step in New Hampshire’s evolving posture toward cryptocurrency after the state passed a crypto reserve law in May 2025.
Supporters in the broader crypto community had argued that Bitcoin-backed instruments could help mainstream digital asset exposure into traditional financial structures. However, opposition reflected concerns that such products may introduce risks that are difficult for retail and local stakeholders to evaluate—particularly in a vehicle intended to function like municipal-style financing.
Risk concerns and Moody’s provisional rating
Not all market participants viewed the plan as straightforward. Some experts warned against the proposal, describing it as carrying “substantial risk” for New Hampshire residents. Their objections centered on the potential volatility and custody-related complexities of using Bitcoin as collateral for public finance-style instruments.
Prior reporting also noted that Moody’s assigned the Bitcoin bond a provisional Ba2 rating in March, underscoring that the credit assessment—while not final—still considered meaningful risk factors. That provisional rating added another layer to the debate: even with an external rating process underway, the executive council ultimately concluded that the plan should not move forward at this time.
What happens next for digital asset policy in New Hampshire
With the council vote going against the issuance, New Hampshire’s near-term path to using Bitcoin within state-backed financial tools appears to narrow. The move also signals that political and regulatory appetite for crypto-linked public finance may vary sharply even when a state’s leadership has already supported broader crypto legislation.
For builders and investors tracking the state as a potential “proof of concept” location, the rejection is a reminder that approval for crypto-adjacent instruments depends not only on legislative frameworks, but also on executive-level risk decisions and the way collateral arrangements are perceived in practice.
Readers should watch whether the BFA revisits the structure of the proposed BTC-backed vehicles, seeks a revised vote, or instead shifts toward other compliance-forward approaches that align with both the state’s crypto reserve direction and the council’s risk concerns; the council’s split decision suggests that future proposals could still find a narrow path to approval if they address those objections directly.
This article was originally published as New Hampshire Council Rejects $100M Bitcoin Bond Proposal on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
8
Article
L’adoption de la blockchain ne profitant pas aux chaînes et réseaux publics constitue une menace plus importante pour Bitcoin que ...Les analystes de JPMorgan estiment que l’adoption de la blockchain qui ne profite pas aux blockchains publiques et à leurs tokens pose un risque plus important pour Bitcoin que pour Strategy et son programme de monétisation en BTC.
Selon un rapport du géant bancaire, les investisseurs considèrent le programme de monétisation de Strategy comme un risque pour le marché crypto, susceptible de générer une pression de vente périodique.
Strategy n’est pas le plus grand risque de Bitcoin
Les analystes, dirigés par le directeur général Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, ont déclaré que si la tokenisation, les paiements et les règlements ont lieu en dehors des réseaux publics, le reste de l’écosystème crypto pourrait connaître une baisse d’activité, de liquidité et d’entrées de capitaux faibles, ce qui pourrait exercer une pression sur Bitcoin.
L’adoption de la blockchain ne profitant pas aux chaînes et réseaux publics constitue une menace plus importante pour Bitcoin que ...
Les analystes de JPMorgan estiment que l’adoption de la blockchain qui ne profite pas aux blockchains publiques et à leurs tokens pose un risque plus important pour Bitcoin que pour Strategy et son programme de monétisation en BTC.
Selon un rapport du géant bancaire, les investisseurs considèrent le programme de monétisation de Strategy comme un risque pour le marché crypto, susceptible de générer une pression de vente périodique.
Strategy n’est pas le plus grand risque de Bitcoin
Les analystes, dirigés par le directeur général Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, ont déclaré que si la tokenisation, les paiements et les règlements ont lieu en dehors des réseaux publics, le reste de l’écosystème crypto pourrait connaître une baisse d’activité, de liquidité et d’entrées de capitaux faibles, ce qui pourrait exercer une pression sur Bitcoin.
Selon un rapport du géant bancaire, les investisseurs considèrent le programme de monétisation de Strategy comme un risque pour le marché crypto, susceptible de générer une pression de vente périodique.
Strategy n’est pas le plus grand risque de Bitcoin
Les analystes, dirigés par le directeur général Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, ont déclaré que si la tokenisation, les paiements et les règlements ont lieu en dehors des réseaux publics, le reste de l’écosystème crypto pourrait connaître une baisse d’activité, de liquidité et d’entrées de capitaux faibles, ce qui pourrait exercer une pression sur Bitcoin.
6
Article
La Digital Chamber dépose un mémoire d’amicus curiae dans une affaire new-yorkaise sur la propriété du BitcoinLa Digital Chamber a déposé un mémoire d’amicus curiae contre un procès intenté à New York, demandant d’obtenir 39 069 adresses de portefeuilles Bitcoin en sommeil détenant environ 3,7 millions de BTC. Elle affirme que l’affaire pourrait porter atteinte à la notion de droits de propriété numériques et d’autocustodie numérique.
Défis de la Chambre numérique pour les revendications de propriété des portefeuilles Bitcoin en sommeil
L’association professionnelle du secteur de la blockchain a publié, lundi, un communiqué indiquant qu’une telle décision entraînerait une confusion quant à la personne qui détient des monnaies numériques dans l’écosystème des cryptoactifs. Elle a déclaré que les portefeuilles Bitcoin inactifs détenus en autocustodie ne sont pas des biens abandonnés. Le groupe a affirmé que la théorie des demandeurs « fragmente des principes fondamentaux de la propriété des actifs numériques et s’étend au-delà du marché crypto ».
La Digital Chamber dépose un mémoire d’amicus curiae dans une affaire new-yorkaise sur la propriété du Bitcoin
La Digital Chamber a déposé un mémoire d’amicus curiae contre un procès intenté à New York, demandant d’obtenir 39 069 adresses de portefeuilles Bitcoin en sommeil détenant environ 3,7 millions de BTC. Elle affirme que l’affaire pourrait porter atteinte à la notion de droits de propriété numériques et d’autocustodie numérique.
Défis de la Chambre numérique pour les revendications de propriété des portefeuilles Bitcoin en sommeil
L’association professionnelle du secteur de la blockchain a publié, lundi, un communiqué indiquant qu’une telle décision entraînerait une confusion quant à la personne qui détient des monnaies numériques dans l’écosystème des cryptoactifs. Elle a déclaré que les portefeuilles Bitcoin inactifs détenus en autocustodie ne sont pas des biens abandonnés. Le groupe a affirmé que la théorie des demandeurs « fragmente des principes fondamentaux de la propriété des actifs numériques et s’étend au-delà du marché crypto ».
Défis de la Chambre numérique pour les revendications de propriété des portefeuilles Bitcoin en sommeil
L’association professionnelle du secteur de la blockchain a publié, lundi, un communiqué indiquant qu’une telle décision entraînerait une confusion quant à la personne qui détient des monnaies numériques dans l’écosystème des cryptoactifs. Elle a déclaré que les portefeuilles Bitcoin inactifs détenus en autocustodie ne sont pas des biens abandonnés. Le groupe a affirmé que la théorie des demandeurs « fragmente des principes fondamentaux de la propriété des actifs numériques et s’étend au-delà du marché crypto ».
35
Article
Le prix du Dogecoin défend le support malgré la défense baissière sur la résistancePoints clés
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue sous la zone de résistance marquée par 0,07596 $ et 0,07652 $.
Les haussiers continuent de maintenir le support à 0,07437 $, évitant ainsi de nouvelles pertes.
Le volume des transactions continue d’augmenter malgré une performance des prix médiocre.
La rupture du support fera intervenir 0,07290 $ comme prochain objectif.
Une percée de la résistance à 0,07652 annulera la vision baissière, faisant évoluer le prix vers 0,07883 $.
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue dans une zone de décision tendue
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue latéralement, car acheteurs et vendeurs se livrent de farouches batailles pour le contrôle à court terme de la paire. Même si les haussiers ont réussi à maintenir des niveaux de support essentiels au cours des derniers jours de bourse, les vendeurs n’ont pas cédé et se tiennent encore près des niveaux de résistance.
Le prix du Dogecoin défend le support malgré la défense baissière sur la résistance
Points clés
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue sous la zone de résistance marquée par 0,07596 $ et 0,07652 $.
Les haussiers continuent de maintenir le support à 0,07437 $, évitant ainsi de nouvelles pertes.
Le volume des transactions continue d’augmenter malgré une performance des prix médiocre.
La rupture du support fera intervenir 0,07290 $ comme prochain objectif.
Une percée de la résistance à 0,07652 annulera la vision baissière, faisant évoluer le prix vers 0,07883 $.
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue dans une zone de décision tendue
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue latéralement, car acheteurs et vendeurs se livrent de farouches batailles pour le contrôle à court terme de la paire. Même si les haussiers ont réussi à maintenir des niveaux de support essentiels au cours des derniers jours de bourse, les vendeurs n’ont pas cédé et se tiennent encore près des niveaux de résistance.
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue sous la zone de résistance marquée par 0,07596 $ et 0,07652 $.
Les haussiers continuent de maintenir le support à 0,07437 $, évitant ainsi de nouvelles pertes.
Le volume des transactions continue d’augmenter malgré une performance des prix médiocre.
La rupture du support fera intervenir 0,07290 $ comme prochain objectif.
Une percée de la résistance à 0,07652 annulera la vision baissière, faisant évoluer le prix vers 0,07883 $.
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue dans une zone de décision tendue
Le prix du Dogecoin évolue latéralement, car acheteurs et vendeurs se livrent de farouches batailles pour le contrôle à court terme de la paire. Même si les haussiers ont réussi à maintenir des niveaux de support essentiels au cours des derniers jours de bourse, les vendeurs n’ont pas cédé et se tiennent encore près des niveaux de résistance.
18
Article
Le prix de XRP cherche une cassure alors que les haussiers s’appuient sur une dynamique à la hausse grâce à une forte activité sur les dérivésPoints clés
Le prix de XRP reste au-dessus du support, ce qui soutient le sentiment haussier du marché.
L’intérêt ouvert et l’activité sur les options indiquent une forte participation des traders sur les produits dérivés.
Les cassures au-dessus de la résistance pourraient permettre aux haussiers d’aller plus loin.
Le prix de XRP reste stable tandis que le sentiment haussier se renforce
Alors que l’élan haussier continue de se renforcer sur les marchés au comptant comme sur ceux des dérivés, XRP attire l’attention. Les haussiers ont maintenu des niveaux de support clés, et la participation aux marchés des futurs et des options suggère que les traders voient encore un potentiel de hausse pour l’actif. Bien que l’évolution des prix se soit calmée après la précédente hausse, le sentiment reste positif, les investisseurs attendant une nouvelle cassure.
Le prix de XRP cherche une cassure alors que les haussiers s’appuient sur une dynamique à la hausse grâce à une forte activité sur les dérivés
Points clés
Le prix de XRP reste au-dessus du support, ce qui soutient le sentiment haussier du marché.
L’intérêt ouvert et l’activité sur les options indiquent une forte participation des traders sur les produits dérivés.
Les cassures au-dessus de la résistance pourraient permettre aux haussiers d’aller plus loin.
Le prix de XRP reste stable tandis que le sentiment haussier se renforce
Alors que l’élan haussier continue de se renforcer sur les marchés au comptant comme sur ceux des dérivés, XRP attire l’attention. Les haussiers ont maintenu des niveaux de support clés, et la participation aux marchés des futurs et des options suggère que les traders voient encore un potentiel de hausse pour l’actif. Bien que l’évolution des prix se soit calmée après la précédente hausse, le sentiment reste positif, les investisseurs attendant une nouvelle cassure.
Le prix de XRP reste au-dessus du support, ce qui soutient le sentiment haussier du marché.
L’intérêt ouvert et l’activité sur les options indiquent une forte participation des traders sur les produits dérivés.
Les cassures au-dessus de la résistance pourraient permettre aux haussiers d’aller plus loin.
Le prix de XRP reste stable tandis que le sentiment haussier se renforce
Alors que l’élan haussier continue de se renforcer sur les marchés au comptant comme sur ceux des dérivés, XRP attire l’attention. Les haussiers ont maintenu des niveaux de support clés, et la participation aux marchés des futurs et des options suggère que les traders voient encore un potentiel de hausse pour l’actif. Bien que l’évolution des prix se soit calmée après la précédente hausse, le sentiment reste positif, les investisseurs attendant une nouvelle cassure.
47
Article
Nouvelles incertitudes pour les crypto-monnaies en Inde alors que la RBI pousse à l’interdiction et que le fisc signale des risquesLes crypto-monnaies en Inde n’arrivent pas à s’en sortir. Des développements récents ont suscité de nouvelles incertitudes : la Reserve Bank of India (RBI) a appuyé une politique interdisant les crypto-monnaies, tandis que le service des impôts a signalé des préoccupations concernant la conformité.
Malgré la position ambiguë de l’Inde à l’égard des crypto-monnaies, le pays demeure l’un des principaux marchés en matière d’adoption « grassroots » de la crypto. Il compte environ 39 millions d’utilisateurs, détenant à peine plus de 2 milliards de dollars d’actifs.
La RBI pousse en faveur d’une interdiction des crypto-monnaies
La politique crypto de l’Inde pourrait rester embrouillée pour le futur proche après que la RBI a réitéré son soutien à une approche visant à interdire les crypto-monnaies. D’après des responsables et des documents consultés par Reuters, la banque centrale veut que les banques et autres institutions financières soient privées d’exposition aux crypto-monnaies et aux stablecoins privés afin de limiter les risques pour les prêteurs et pour l’ensemble du système financier.
Nouvelles incertitudes pour les crypto-monnaies en Inde alors que la RBI pousse à l’interdiction et que le fisc signale des risques
Les crypto-monnaies en Inde n’arrivent pas à s’en sortir. Des développements récents ont suscité de nouvelles incertitudes : la Reserve Bank of India (RBI) a appuyé une politique interdisant les crypto-monnaies, tandis que le service des impôts a signalé des préoccupations concernant la conformité.
Malgré la position ambiguë de l’Inde à l’égard des crypto-monnaies, le pays demeure l’un des principaux marchés en matière d’adoption « grassroots » de la crypto. Il compte environ 39 millions d’utilisateurs, détenant à peine plus de 2 milliards de dollars d’actifs.
La RBI pousse en faveur d’une interdiction des crypto-monnaies
La politique crypto de l’Inde pourrait rester embrouillée pour le futur proche après que la RBI a réitéré son soutien à une approche visant à interdire les crypto-monnaies. D’après des responsables et des documents consultés par Reuters, la banque centrale veut que les banques et autres institutions financières soient privées d’exposition aux crypto-monnaies et aux stablecoins privés afin de limiter les risques pour les prêteurs et pour l’ensemble du système financier.
Malgré la position ambiguë de l’Inde à l’égard des crypto-monnaies, le pays demeure l’un des principaux marchés en matière d’adoption « grassroots » de la crypto. Il compte environ 39 millions d’utilisateurs, détenant à peine plus de 2 milliards de dollars d’actifs.
La RBI pousse en faveur d’une interdiction des crypto-monnaies
La politique crypto de l’Inde pourrait rester embrouillée pour le futur proche après que la RBI a réitéré son soutien à une approche visant à interdire les crypto-monnaies. D’après des responsables et des documents consultés par Reuters, la banque centrale veut que les banques et autres institutions financières soient privées d’exposition aux crypto-monnaies et aux stablecoins privés afin de limiter les risques pour les prêteurs et pour l’ensemble du système financier.
21
Article
Le Bitcoin (BTC) fléchit alors que les tensions entre les États-Unis et l’Iran s’intensifient : Trump met en garde contre une nouvelle action militaireLe Bitcoin (BTC) et le marché plus large des cryptomonnaies subissaient à nouveau des pressions après que le président américain Donald Trump a averti de l’éventuelle reprise d’actions militaires contre l’Iran, mettant effectivement fin à la fragile trêve en place depuis avril.
La principale cryptomonnaie a chuté de près de 2% mercredi, tombant à un plus bas de 61 453 $ avant de s’établir à 62 237 $. D’autres ont connu une évolution tout aussi mauvaise, voire pire, avec notamment l’Ethereum (ETH) en baisse de 1,34% à 1 732 $. Ripple (XRP), Solana (SOL), Dogecoin (DOGE), Stellar (XLM), Chainlink (LINK) et d’autres jetons évoluent aussi dans le rouge.
Le Bitcoin (BTC) fléchit alors que les tensions entre les États-Unis et l’Iran s’intensifient : Trump met en garde contre une nouvelle action militaire
Le Bitcoin (BTC) et le marché plus large des cryptomonnaies subissaient à nouveau des pressions après que le président américain Donald Trump a averti de l’éventuelle reprise d’actions militaires contre l’Iran, mettant effectivement fin à la fragile trêve en place depuis avril.
La principale cryptomonnaie a chuté de près de 2% mercredi, tombant à un plus bas de 61 453 $ avant de s’établir à 62 237 $. D’autres ont connu une évolution tout aussi mauvaise, voire pire, avec notamment l’Ethereum (ETH) en baisse de 1,34% à 1 732 $. Ripple (XRP), Solana (SOL), Dogecoin (DOGE), Stellar (XLM), Chainlink (LINK) et d’autres jetons évoluent aussi dans le rouge.
La principale cryptomonnaie a chuté de près de 2% mercredi, tombant à un plus bas de 61 453 $ avant de s’établir à 62 237 $. D’autres ont connu une évolution tout aussi mauvaise, voire pire, avec notamment l’Ethereum (ETH) en baisse de 1,34% à 1 732 $. Ripple (XRP), Solana (SOL), Dogecoin (DOGE), Stellar (XLM), Chainlink (LINK) et d’autres jetons évoluent aussi dans le rouge.
158
Article
Voir la traduction
Bitcoin Resistance Breakout Stands at Crossroads as Bulls Challenge Important TrendlineA Bitcoin resistance breakout continues to be among the most monitored technical events in the market amid a crucial week for BTC. Despite the many times BTC has defended an essential support level, the cryptocurrency is once again rallying toward a descending resistance level that has previously limited past rallies.
Despite positive buying pressure seen lately, there are still some concerns from traders amid the expected breakout by BTC. There are clear indications that Bitcoin is heading into a defining point.
Bitcoin Bounces Back After Another Successful Defense of Its Support
Bitcoin has bounced back after yet another successful defense of its support level, reaffirming the belief of the traders. As shown on a chart published on CryptoBusy, buyers intervened close to the lower edge of the current trading range, stopping further downside.
The formation of a huge descending triangle continues to be seen on the daily chart, a structure that has prevailed for a few months now for Bitcoin. Although buyers are defending the horizontal support level, sellers have also been defending the descending resistance trendline.
The current bounce in Bitcoin has brought it closer to the middle of the triangle, but the upper trendline acts as the main technical hurdle.
Descending Triangle Tightens Further
The narrowing pattern of the descending triangle implies that the cryptocurrency is on the verge of making a crucial move. With each passing day, price compression becomes tighter, a situation that often precedes a period of increased volatility.
The previous rallies have been turned away at the descending trendline, underscoring its importance as the resistance level in the market. Meanwhile, there have been attempts from buyers to defend the horizontal support level.
A breakout above the resistance level would be considered a major positive development if it receives good trading volume support. Otherwise, the focus will continue to be on the consolidation phase.
Balance in the Futures Market
Currently, there is a relatively balanced situation in terms of bulls and bears in the futures market of Bitcoin. Compared with some previous months, the level of liquidations has significantly decreased, so we can assume that leverage in the market is not too high at the moment. The largest liquidations were observed in early February and early June, when the amount of long liquidations for some time surpassed the mark of $1 billion. At the moment, the levels of liquidations are much lower, so there are fewer chances for a sharp move due to liquidations alone.
On the other hand, open interest is still relatively high on the main futures exchanges. The leader on the open interest list is Binance with $8.80 billion in Bitcoin futures contracts; CME, Bybit, and OKX also have significant open interest. The futures trading volume is also high, with Binance processing about $9.04 billion in trades.
This article was originally published as Bitcoin Resistance Breakout Stands at Crossroads as Bulls Challenge Important Trendline on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
Bitcoin Resistance Breakout Stands at Crossroads as Bulls Challenge Important Trendline
A Bitcoin resistance breakout continues to be among the most monitored technical events in the market amid a crucial week for BTC. Despite the many times BTC has defended an essential support level, the cryptocurrency is once again rallying toward a descending resistance level that has previously limited past rallies.
Despite positive buying pressure seen lately, there are still some concerns from traders amid the expected breakout by BTC. There are clear indications that Bitcoin is heading into a defining point.
Bitcoin Bounces Back After Another Successful Defense of Its Support
Bitcoin has bounced back after yet another successful defense of its support level, reaffirming the belief of the traders. As shown on a chart published on CryptoBusy, buyers intervened close to the lower edge of the current trading range, stopping further downside.
The formation of a huge descending triangle continues to be seen on the daily chart, a structure that has prevailed for a few months now for Bitcoin. Although buyers are defending the horizontal support level, sellers have also been defending the descending resistance trendline.
The current bounce in Bitcoin has brought it closer to the middle of the triangle, but the upper trendline acts as the main technical hurdle.
Descending Triangle Tightens Further
The narrowing pattern of the descending triangle implies that the cryptocurrency is on the verge of making a crucial move. With each passing day, price compression becomes tighter, a situation that often precedes a period of increased volatility.
The previous rallies have been turned away at the descending trendline, underscoring its importance as the resistance level in the market. Meanwhile, there have been attempts from buyers to defend the horizontal support level.
A breakout above the resistance level would be considered a major positive development if it receives good trading volume support. Otherwise, the focus will continue to be on the consolidation phase.
Balance in the Futures Market
Currently, there is a relatively balanced situation in terms of bulls and bears in the futures market of Bitcoin. Compared with some previous months, the level of liquidations has significantly decreased, so we can assume that leverage in the market is not too high at the moment. The largest liquidations were observed in early February and early June, when the amount of long liquidations for some time surpassed the mark of $1 billion. At the moment, the levels of liquidations are much lower, so there are fewer chances for a sharp move due to liquidations alone.
On the other hand, open interest is still relatively high on the main futures exchanges. The leader on the open interest list is Binance with $8.80 billion in Bitcoin futures contracts; CME, Bybit, and OKX also have significant open interest. The futures trading volume is also high, with Binance processing about $9.04 billion in trades.
This article was originally published as Bitcoin Resistance Breakout Stands at Crossroads as Bulls Challenge Important Trendline on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
Despite positive buying pressure seen lately, there are still some concerns from traders amid the expected breakout by BTC. There are clear indications that Bitcoin is heading into a defining point.
Bitcoin Bounces Back After Another Successful Defense of Its Support
Bitcoin has bounced back after yet another successful defense of its support level, reaffirming the belief of the traders. As shown on a chart published on CryptoBusy, buyers intervened close to the lower edge of the current trading range, stopping further downside.
The formation of a huge descending triangle continues to be seen on the daily chart, a structure that has prevailed for a few months now for Bitcoin. Although buyers are defending the horizontal support level, sellers have also been defending the descending resistance trendline.
The current bounce in Bitcoin has brought it closer to the middle of the triangle, but the upper trendline acts as the main technical hurdle.
Descending Triangle Tightens Further
The narrowing pattern of the descending triangle implies that the cryptocurrency is on the verge of making a crucial move. With each passing day, price compression becomes tighter, a situation that often precedes a period of increased volatility.
The previous rallies have been turned away at the descending trendline, underscoring its importance as the resistance level in the market. Meanwhile, there have been attempts from buyers to defend the horizontal support level.
A breakout above the resistance level would be considered a major positive development if it receives good trading volume support. Otherwise, the focus will continue to be on the consolidation phase.
Balance in the Futures Market
Currently, there is a relatively balanced situation in terms of bulls and bears in the futures market of Bitcoin. Compared with some previous months, the level of liquidations has significantly decreased, so we can assume that leverage in the market is not too high at the moment. The largest liquidations were observed in early February and early June, when the amount of long liquidations for some time surpassed the mark of $1 billion. At the moment, the levels of liquidations are much lower, so there are fewer chances for a sharp move due to liquidations alone.
On the other hand, open interest is still relatively high on the main futures exchanges. The leader on the open interest list is Binance with $8.80 billion in Bitcoin futures contracts; CME, Bybit, and OKX also have significant open interest. The futures trading volume is also high, with Binance processing about $9.04 billion in trades.
This article was originally published as Bitcoin Resistance Breakout Stands at Crossroads as Bulls Challenge Important Trendline on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
23
Article
Voir la traduction
Crypto Market Selloff Wipes $450M As Bitcoin, Ethereum, And XRP Drop After Trump Iran RemarksThe cryptocurrency market recorded heavy losses after fresh geopolitical tensions triggered broad selling across digital assets. Bitcoin slipped below the $62,000 level, while Ethereum and XRP extended declines during the market-wide downturn. At the same time, leveraged positions worth nearly $450 million were liquidated, reflecting stronger volatility across major cryptocurrencies.
Bitcoin Leads Crypto Market Liquidations
Bitcoin recorded the largest liquidation volume after sellers pushed the asset below the $62,000 mark. The decline followed renewed geopolitical uncertainty after U.S. President Donald Trump declared the memorandum of understanding with Iran had ended. Consequently, traders reduced exposure across risk assets as volatility increased.
CoinGlass data showed that the crypto market registered $449.63 million in liquidations during the past 24 hours. The platform recorded liquidations affecting 145,221 traders across major exchanges. Long positions accounted for $343.43 million, while short positions represented $106.20 million.
Bitcoin alone contributed $99.90 million in liquidations during the market correction. Binance also recorded the single largest liquidation after an ETHUSDT position worth $7.24 million closed automatically. Meanwhile, broader selling pressure continued across leading cryptocurrencies as market sentiment weakened.
Ethereum Faces Heavy Selling Pressure
Ethereum followed Bitcoin lower as traders exited leveraged positions during the broader market decline. CoinGlass data showed Ethereum liquidations reached approximately $90.67 million over the reporting period. Selling activity remained elevated across major trading platforms throughout the session.
The market downturn coincided with rising geopolitical risks involving the United States and Iran. Trump indicated that discussions with Iran no longer remained productive and signaled an end to the previous diplomatic framework. Those developments increased uncertainty across global financial markets and weighed on digital assets.
At the same time, reports pointed to fresh military developments in the Middle East. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced responses following recent U.S. strikes and additional sanctions targeting Iranian oil exports. Regional tensions also affected shipping activity around the Strait of Hormuz, increasing pressure on broader risk markets.
XRP Declines As Market Sentiment Weakens
XRP also moved lower as the wider cryptocurrency market extended losses. Liquidation data showed more than $9 million in XRP positions closed during the latest selling wave. The decline reflected broad market weakness instead of asset-specific developments.
Outside XRP, Solana recorded approximately $24.19 million in liquidations, while other cryptocurrencies combined reached $60.83 million. The figures highlighted widespread selling across the digital asset market rather than isolated weakness. Consequently, major cryptocurrencies experienced synchronized declines during the trading session.
Additional developments also influenced overall market sentiment during the day. Israeli media reported that U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth canceled a planned visit to Israel as regional tensions intensified. Combined with ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, those developments added pressure across cryptocurrency markets and increased short-term volatility.
The latest selloff continues a pattern where geopolitical events quickly influence digital asset prices alongside traditional financial markets. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP have previously experienced similar reactions during periods of heightened global uncertainty. Although cryptocurrency markets operate continuously, macroeconomic events and international conflicts still shape short-term price movements through changes in market sentiment and leveraged trading activity.
This article was originally published as Crypto Market Selloff Wipes $450M As Bitcoin, Ethereum, And XRP Drop After Trump Iran Remarks on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
Crypto Market Selloff Wipes $450M As Bitcoin, Ethereum, And XRP Drop After Trump Iran Remarks
The cryptocurrency market recorded heavy losses after fresh geopolitical tensions triggered broad selling across digital assets. Bitcoin slipped below the $62,000 level, while Ethereum and XRP extended declines during the market-wide downturn. At the same time, leveraged positions worth nearly $450 million were liquidated, reflecting stronger volatility across major cryptocurrencies.
Bitcoin Leads Crypto Market Liquidations
Bitcoin recorded the largest liquidation volume after sellers pushed the asset below the $62,000 mark. The decline followed renewed geopolitical uncertainty after U.S. President Donald Trump declared the memorandum of understanding with Iran had ended. Consequently, traders reduced exposure across risk assets as volatility increased.
CoinGlass data showed that the crypto market registered $449.63 million in liquidations during the past 24 hours. The platform recorded liquidations affecting 145,221 traders across major exchanges. Long positions accounted for $343.43 million, while short positions represented $106.20 million.
Bitcoin alone contributed $99.90 million in liquidations during the market correction. Binance also recorded the single largest liquidation after an ETHUSDT position worth $7.24 million closed automatically. Meanwhile, broader selling pressure continued across leading cryptocurrencies as market sentiment weakened.
Ethereum Faces Heavy Selling Pressure
Ethereum followed Bitcoin lower as traders exited leveraged positions during the broader market decline. CoinGlass data showed Ethereum liquidations reached approximately $90.67 million over the reporting period. Selling activity remained elevated across major trading platforms throughout the session.
The market downturn coincided with rising geopolitical risks involving the United States and Iran. Trump indicated that discussions with Iran no longer remained productive and signaled an end to the previous diplomatic framework. Those developments increased uncertainty across global financial markets and weighed on digital assets.
At the same time, reports pointed to fresh military developments in the Middle East. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced responses following recent U.S. strikes and additional sanctions targeting Iranian oil exports. Regional tensions also affected shipping activity around the Strait of Hormuz, increasing pressure on broader risk markets.
XRP Declines As Market Sentiment Weakens
XRP also moved lower as the wider cryptocurrency market extended losses. Liquidation data showed more than $9 million in XRP positions closed during the latest selling wave. The decline reflected broad market weakness instead of asset-specific developments.
Outside XRP, Solana recorded approximately $24.19 million in liquidations, while other cryptocurrencies combined reached $60.83 million. The figures highlighted widespread selling across the digital asset market rather than isolated weakness. Consequently, major cryptocurrencies experienced synchronized declines during the trading session.
Additional developments also influenced overall market sentiment during the day. Israeli media reported that U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth canceled a planned visit to Israel as regional tensions intensified. Combined with ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, those developments added pressure across cryptocurrency markets and increased short-term volatility.
The latest selloff continues a pattern where geopolitical events quickly influence digital asset prices alongside traditional financial markets. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP have previously experienced similar reactions during periods of heightened global uncertainty. Although cryptocurrency markets operate continuously, macroeconomic events and international conflicts still shape short-term price movements through changes in market sentiment and leveraged trading activity.
This article was originally published as Crypto Market Selloff Wipes $450M As Bitcoin, Ethereum, And XRP Drop After Trump Iran Remarks on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
Bitcoin Leads Crypto Market Liquidations
Bitcoin recorded the largest liquidation volume after sellers pushed the asset below the $62,000 mark. The decline followed renewed geopolitical uncertainty after U.S. President Donald Trump declared the memorandum of understanding with Iran had ended. Consequently, traders reduced exposure across risk assets as volatility increased.
CoinGlass data showed that the crypto market registered $449.63 million in liquidations during the past 24 hours. The platform recorded liquidations affecting 145,221 traders across major exchanges. Long positions accounted for $343.43 million, while short positions represented $106.20 million.
Bitcoin alone contributed $99.90 million in liquidations during the market correction. Binance also recorded the single largest liquidation after an ETHUSDT position worth $7.24 million closed automatically. Meanwhile, broader selling pressure continued across leading cryptocurrencies as market sentiment weakened.
Ethereum Faces Heavy Selling Pressure
Ethereum followed Bitcoin lower as traders exited leveraged positions during the broader market decline. CoinGlass data showed Ethereum liquidations reached approximately $90.67 million over the reporting period. Selling activity remained elevated across major trading platforms throughout the session.
The market downturn coincided with rising geopolitical risks involving the United States and Iran. Trump indicated that discussions with Iran no longer remained productive and signaled an end to the previous diplomatic framework. Those developments increased uncertainty across global financial markets and weighed on digital assets.
At the same time, reports pointed to fresh military developments in the Middle East. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced responses following recent U.S. strikes and additional sanctions targeting Iranian oil exports. Regional tensions also affected shipping activity around the Strait of Hormuz, increasing pressure on broader risk markets.
XRP Declines As Market Sentiment Weakens
XRP also moved lower as the wider cryptocurrency market extended losses. Liquidation data showed more than $9 million in XRP positions closed during the latest selling wave. The decline reflected broad market weakness instead of asset-specific developments.
Outside XRP, Solana recorded approximately $24.19 million in liquidations, while other cryptocurrencies combined reached $60.83 million. The figures highlighted widespread selling across the digital asset market rather than isolated weakness. Consequently, major cryptocurrencies experienced synchronized declines during the trading session.
Additional developments also influenced overall market sentiment during the day. Israeli media reported that U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth canceled a planned visit to Israel as regional tensions intensified. Combined with ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, those developments added pressure across cryptocurrency markets and increased short-term volatility.
The latest selloff continues a pattern where geopolitical events quickly influence digital asset prices alongside traditional financial markets. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP have previously experienced similar reactions during periods of heightened global uncertainty. Although cryptocurrency markets operate continuously, macroeconomic events and international conflicts still shape short-term price movements through changes in market sentiment and leveraged trading activity.
This article was originally published as Crypto Market Selloff Wipes $450M As Bitcoin, Ethereum, And XRP Drop After Trump Iran Remarks on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
77
Article
Backpack lance les actions tokenisées en 24/7 alors qu’elle vise le trading mondial d’actionsBackpack, une bourse de crypto-monnaies, a lancé le trading 24/7 pour certains titres boursiers tokenisés basés sur des actions américaines, offrant ainsi aux utilisateurs internationaux un moyen de négocier des actions liées à des entreprises telles que SpaceX, Micron et SanDisk en dehors des heures de marché traditionnelles. La société a indiqué que le lancement initial se concentre sur un panier limité de noms cotés aux États-Unis, avec d’autres ajouts prévus par la suite.
L’offre de Backpack est conçue pour offrir une propriété directe des actions sous-jacentes plutôt qu’une exposition de marché synthétique. La bourse indique que les transactions peuvent être réglées instantanément et financées à l’aide de monnaie fiduciaire ou de stablecoins.
Backpack lance les actions tokenisées en 24/7 alors qu’elle vise le trading mondial d’actions
Backpack, une bourse de crypto-monnaies, a lancé le trading 24/7 pour certains titres boursiers tokenisés basés sur des actions américaines, offrant ainsi aux utilisateurs internationaux un moyen de négocier des actions liées à des entreprises telles que SpaceX, Micron et SanDisk en dehors des heures de marché traditionnelles. La société a indiqué que le lancement initial se concentre sur un panier limité de noms cotés aux États-Unis, avec d’autres ajouts prévus par la suite.
L’offre de Backpack est conçue pour offrir une propriété directe des actions sous-jacentes plutôt qu’une exposition de marché synthétique. La bourse indique que les transactions peuvent être réglées instantanément et financées à l’aide de monnaie fiduciaire ou de stablecoins.
L’offre de Backpack est conçue pour offrir une propriété directe des actions sous-jacentes plutôt qu’une exposition de marché synthétique. La bourse indique que les transactions peuvent être réglées instantanément et financées à l’aide de monnaie fiduciaire ou de stablecoins.
8
Article
Les stablecoins consolident un rôle croissant dans les paiements et les transferts de fonds en cryptoLes stablecoins se comportent de plus en plus comme une infrastructure spécialisée plutôt que comme de simples substituts directs. De nouvelles données d’utilisation mises en évidence par Dune suggèrent que le USDT de Tether et le USDC de Circle se consolident autour de rôles distincts, à la fois sur la chaîne et dans le monde réel — l’USDT s’orientant vers les paiements commerciaux, tandis que l’USDC reste étroitement lié à l’activité de la finance décentralisée (DeFi).
Parallèlement, le cadre MiCA de l’Europe semble accélérer la demande de stablecoins adossés à l’euro, tandis que la finance traditionnelle continue de se rapprocher de la tokenisation. Ailleurs dans Crypto Biz, la dernière vente de Bitcoin de Strategy destinée à financer des dividendes aux actionnaires a rouvert le débat autour de la posture de l’entreprise « ne jamais vendre », et Vanguard s’est rapproché des actifs numériques en recrutant un responsable de la division.
Les stablecoins consolident un rôle croissant dans les paiements et les transferts de fonds en crypto
Les stablecoins se comportent de plus en plus comme une infrastructure spécialisée plutôt que comme de simples substituts directs. De nouvelles données d’utilisation mises en évidence par Dune suggèrent que le USDT de Tether et le USDC de Circle se consolident autour de rôles distincts, à la fois sur la chaîne et dans le monde réel — l’USDT s’orientant vers les paiements commerciaux, tandis que l’USDC reste étroitement lié à l’activité de la finance décentralisée (DeFi).
Parallèlement, le cadre MiCA de l’Europe semble accélérer la demande de stablecoins adossés à l’euro, tandis que la finance traditionnelle continue de se rapprocher de la tokenisation. Ailleurs dans Crypto Biz, la dernière vente de Bitcoin de Strategy destinée à financer des dividendes aux actionnaires a rouvert le débat autour de la posture de l’entreprise « ne jamais vendre », et Vanguard s’est rapproché des actifs numériques en recrutant un responsable de la division.
Parallèlement, le cadre MiCA de l’Europe semble accélérer la demande de stablecoins adossés à l’euro, tandis que la finance traditionnelle continue de se rapprocher de la tokenisation. Ailleurs dans Crypto Biz, la dernière vente de Bitcoin de Strategy destinée à financer des dividendes aux actionnaires a rouvert le débat autour de la posture de l’entreprise « ne jamais vendre », et Vanguard s’est rapproché des actifs numériques en recrutant un responsable de la division.
73
Article
Les whales du Bitcoin et le Coinbase Premium propulsent le BTC vers 64 000 $, selon CryptoQuantLe dernier rebond du Bitcoin vers le milieu des 60 000 $ attire à nouveau l’attention d’analystes on-chain, avec de nouveaux commentaires indiquant que l’activité des grands détenteurs américains (whales) serait un moteur précoce du momentum côté demande. Par ailleurs, Bitcoin Suisse met en avant des signes montrant que les conditions de marché pourraient être en train d’évoluer—malgré une prudence persistante dans les flux des ETF spot Bitcoin aux États-Unis.
D’après un billet de blog publié vendredi par le contributeur de CryptoQuant Burak Kesmeci, le « Coinbase Premium » montre des indices d’un renforcement du comportement acheteur, même si la lecture globale de l’indice reste en dessous des niveaux neutres.
Les whales du Bitcoin et le Coinbase Premium propulsent le BTC vers 64 000 $, selon CryptoQuant
Le dernier rebond du Bitcoin vers le milieu des 60 000 $ attire à nouveau l’attention d’analystes on-chain, avec de nouveaux commentaires indiquant que l’activité des grands détenteurs américains (whales) serait un moteur précoce du momentum côté demande. Par ailleurs, Bitcoin Suisse met en avant des signes montrant que les conditions de marché pourraient être en train d’évoluer—malgré une prudence persistante dans les flux des ETF spot Bitcoin aux États-Unis.
D’après un billet de blog publié vendredi par le contributeur de CryptoQuant Burak Kesmeci, le « Coinbase Premium » montre des indices d’un renforcement du comportement acheteur, même si la lecture globale de l’indice reste en dessous des niveaux neutres.
D’après un billet de blog publié vendredi par le contributeur de CryptoQuant Burak Kesmeci, le « Coinbase Premium » montre des indices d’un renforcement du comportement acheteur, même si la lecture globale de l’indice reste en dessous des niveaux neutres.
131
Article
Voir la traduction
Andreessen Appointee Brings Fed Role to A16z Amid AI Policy ShiftThe U.S. Federal Reserve has named Marc Andreessen, a co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), to help lead a new task force examining how artificial intelligence and other general-purpose technologies could reshape productivity and jobs.
Alongside Andreessen, the Fed’s Productivity and Jobs task force will include Charles I. Jones of Stanford University and Asha Sharma, a Microsoft executive vice president and Xbox CEO. The group’s mandate is to evaluate potential employment and productivity effects from technologies such as AI to inform future central bank policymaking. The Fed outlined the appointments in a Thursday press release.
Key takeaways
The Fed is forming a Productivity and Jobs task force to study how AI and other broad technologies may affect employment and productivity.
Marc Andreessen joins economist Charles I. Jones and Microsoft/Xbox executive Asha Sharma as part of the new working group.
The appointments come under a wider task-force overhaul led by Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, focused on several areas of monetary policy conduct.
Fed officials remain split on whether AI will ultimately be disinflationary through productivity gains or inflationary via near-term spending.
A new Fed task force for AI-era labor and output
According to the Fed, the Productivity and Jobs task force will assess how general-purpose technologies—including AI—may influence both labor markets and economic output. That focus matters because productivity trends can affect how quickly the economy can grow without reigniting inflation, while employment dynamics can influence demand, wage pressures, and the broader inflation outlook.
Andreessen will serve as one of the task force’s leaders, joining Charles I. Jones and Asha Sharma. Jones is a Stanford economics professor currently on leave at Anthropic. Sharma brings experience from large-scale technology and consumer platform operations through her role at Microsoft and Xbox. The Fed described the effort as a way to strengthen its policymaking inputs as new technologies evolve.
Warsh’s broader push: five task forces across policy operations
The Productivity and Jobs group is one of five task forces launched under new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh. In separate workstreams, the other teams will examine policy communication, balance sheet policy, data quality, and inflation frameworks.
Warsh revealed the leadership-driven reorganization and the creation of the five task forces during a June 17 press conference. He characterized the topics as timely and consequential and said each group would be independently led by leading experts “both inside and outside the economics profession.”
The chair also indicated the Fed intends to publish policy statements and guidance in shorter, clearer language—an operational shift that could affect how markets interpret Fed decisions and guidance going forward.
How Fed thinking on AI inflation differs
The Fed’s decision to dedicate a task force to technology and jobs arrives amid an ongoing debate inside the central bank about AI’s macroeconomic effects—particularly whether AI is ultimately inflationary or disinflationary.
In a May 27 speech, Governor Lisa Cook said she expects AI to further “boost productivity growth,” contributing to her view that GDP will grow robustly. At the same time, she noted AI carries the risk of “higher inflation,” reflecting concerns that the near-term costs of adopting and building AI infrastructure could feed into prices before productivity gains fully materialize. (Governor Cook’s remarks were delivered in a May 27 speech.)
Former Fed Chair Jerome Powell has also pointed to the inflationary pressure that can come from data center spending. In statements from March 2026 referenced by the Fed, Powell said that data center investment is putting pressure on goods and services and is “probably pushing inflation up at the margin.” The implication is that even if AI later reduces costs through productivity, the path to that outcome may involve heightened demand in the near term—complicating monetary policy timing.
Taken together, the internal split underscores why a labor-and-productivity task force could be significant: employment effects can influence wage growth and consumption, while productivity trajectories influence the economy’s supply side. AI adoption may therefore shift both the demand and supply sides of the inflation equation—just not necessarily in the same direction or at the same speed.
What Andreessen’s appointment signals for the Fed’s tech outreach
Marc Andreessen co-founded Andreessen Horowitz, which the Fed-focused article context describes as a major backer of both crypto and AI startups. While the Fed’s task force is not a statement of endorsement for any technology, the appointment highlights how the central bank is increasingly drawing on expertise from the technology and investment ecosystem as AI moves from research to large-scale deployment.
The connections between Warsh and Andreessen also extend beyond this new role. Earlier reporting tied Warsh and Andreessen to their days at Stanford in the early 1990s, and a CNBC interview from April 2026 cited Warsh describing both Andreessen and Palantir’s Peter Thiel as friends from college. Andreessen also publicly backed Warsh’s Fed chair nomination in a Jan. 30 X post following the nomination, writing that he has known Warsh for 30 years and that Warsh combines insight in economics and finance with an understanding of technology and business. Those remarks were posted by Andreessen on X at the time and are linked through the original coverage (see this post).
For investors and market participants, the more practical takeaway is not personal networking but the Fed’s evolving approach to gathering inputs: a central bank tasked with managing inflation and employment in a high-tech economy may find it increasingly difficult to rely only on traditional econometric relationships, especially when the cost structure and labor implications of AI can evolve quickly.
Going forward, the main thing to watch is how the Productivity and Jobs task force translates its findings into usable policymaking inputs—particularly whether it can better distinguish between near-term price pressures tied to AI investment and longer-term disinflationary effects driven by productivity. With the Fed already split on AI’s direction of travel, the task force’s work could become a key reference point for how officials assess the inflation outlook in the months ahead.
This article was originally published as Andreessen Appointee Brings Fed Role to A16z Amid AI Policy Shift on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
Andreessen Appointee Brings Fed Role to A16z Amid AI Policy Shift
The U.S. Federal Reserve has named Marc Andreessen, a co-founder of Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), to help lead a new task force examining how artificial intelligence and other general-purpose technologies could reshape productivity and jobs.
Alongside Andreessen, the Fed’s Productivity and Jobs task force will include Charles I. Jones of Stanford University and Asha Sharma, a Microsoft executive vice president and Xbox CEO. The group’s mandate is to evaluate potential employment and productivity effects from technologies such as AI to inform future central bank policymaking. The Fed outlined the appointments in a Thursday press release.
Key takeaways
The Fed is forming a Productivity and Jobs task force to study how AI and other broad technologies may affect employment and productivity.
Marc Andreessen joins economist Charles I. Jones and Microsoft/Xbox executive Asha Sharma as part of the new working group.
The appointments come under a wider task-force overhaul led by Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, focused on several areas of monetary policy conduct.
Fed officials remain split on whether AI will ultimately be disinflationary through productivity gains or inflationary via near-term spending.
A new Fed task force for AI-era labor and output
According to the Fed, the Productivity and Jobs task force will assess how general-purpose technologies—including AI—may influence both labor markets and economic output. That focus matters because productivity trends can affect how quickly the economy can grow without reigniting inflation, while employment dynamics can influence demand, wage pressures, and the broader inflation outlook.
Andreessen will serve as one of the task force’s leaders, joining Charles I. Jones and Asha Sharma. Jones is a Stanford economics professor currently on leave at Anthropic. Sharma brings experience from large-scale technology and consumer platform operations through her role at Microsoft and Xbox. The Fed described the effort as a way to strengthen its policymaking inputs as new technologies evolve.
Warsh’s broader push: five task forces across policy operations
The Productivity and Jobs group is one of five task forces launched under new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh. In separate workstreams, the other teams will examine policy communication, balance sheet policy, data quality, and inflation frameworks.
Warsh revealed the leadership-driven reorganization and the creation of the five task forces during a June 17 press conference. He characterized the topics as timely and consequential and said each group would be independently led by leading experts “both inside and outside the economics profession.”
The chair also indicated the Fed intends to publish policy statements and guidance in shorter, clearer language—an operational shift that could affect how markets interpret Fed decisions and guidance going forward.
How Fed thinking on AI inflation differs
The Fed’s decision to dedicate a task force to technology and jobs arrives amid an ongoing debate inside the central bank about AI’s macroeconomic effects—particularly whether AI is ultimately inflationary or disinflationary.
In a May 27 speech, Governor Lisa Cook said she expects AI to further “boost productivity growth,” contributing to her view that GDP will grow robustly. At the same time, she noted AI carries the risk of “higher inflation,” reflecting concerns that the near-term costs of adopting and building AI infrastructure could feed into prices before productivity gains fully materialize. (Governor Cook’s remarks were delivered in a May 27 speech.)
Former Fed Chair Jerome Powell has also pointed to the inflationary pressure that can come from data center spending. In statements from March 2026 referenced by the Fed, Powell said that data center investment is putting pressure on goods and services and is “probably pushing inflation up at the margin.” The implication is that even if AI later reduces costs through productivity, the path to that outcome may involve heightened demand in the near term—complicating monetary policy timing.
Taken together, the internal split underscores why a labor-and-productivity task force could be significant: employment effects can influence wage growth and consumption, while productivity trajectories influence the economy’s supply side. AI adoption may therefore shift both the demand and supply sides of the inflation equation—just not necessarily in the same direction or at the same speed.
What Andreessen’s appointment signals for the Fed’s tech outreach
Marc Andreessen co-founded Andreessen Horowitz, which the Fed-focused article context describes as a major backer of both crypto and AI startups. While the Fed’s task force is not a statement of endorsement for any technology, the appointment highlights how the central bank is increasingly drawing on expertise from the technology and investment ecosystem as AI moves from research to large-scale deployment.
The connections between Warsh and Andreessen also extend beyond this new role. Earlier reporting tied Warsh and Andreessen to their days at Stanford in the early 1990s, and a CNBC interview from April 2026 cited Warsh describing both Andreessen and Palantir’s Peter Thiel as friends from college. Andreessen also publicly backed Warsh’s Fed chair nomination in a Jan. 30 X post following the nomination, writing that he has known Warsh for 30 years and that Warsh combines insight in economics and finance with an understanding of technology and business. Those remarks were posted by Andreessen on X at the time and are linked through the original coverage (see this post).
For investors and market participants, the more practical takeaway is not personal networking but the Fed’s evolving approach to gathering inputs: a central bank tasked with managing inflation and employment in a high-tech economy may find it increasingly difficult to rely only on traditional econometric relationships, especially when the cost structure and labor implications of AI can evolve quickly.
Going forward, the main thing to watch is how the Productivity and Jobs task force translates its findings into usable policymaking inputs—particularly whether it can better distinguish between near-term price pressures tied to AI investment and longer-term disinflationary effects driven by productivity. With the Fed already split on AI’s direction of travel, the task force’s work could become a key reference point for how officials assess the inflation outlook in the months ahead.
This article was originally published as Andreessen Appointee Brings Fed Role to A16z Amid AI Policy Shift on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
Alongside Andreessen, the Fed’s Productivity and Jobs task force will include Charles I. Jones of Stanford University and Asha Sharma, a Microsoft executive vice president and Xbox CEO. The group’s mandate is to evaluate potential employment and productivity effects from technologies such as AI to inform future central bank policymaking. The Fed outlined the appointments in a Thursday press release.
Key takeaways
The Fed is forming a Productivity and Jobs task force to study how AI and other broad technologies may affect employment and productivity.
Marc Andreessen joins economist Charles I. Jones and Microsoft/Xbox executive Asha Sharma as part of the new working group.
The appointments come under a wider task-force overhaul led by Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, focused on several areas of monetary policy conduct.
Fed officials remain split on whether AI will ultimately be disinflationary through productivity gains or inflationary via near-term spending.
A new Fed task force for AI-era labor and output
According to the Fed, the Productivity and Jobs task force will assess how general-purpose technologies—including AI—may influence both labor markets and economic output. That focus matters because productivity trends can affect how quickly the economy can grow without reigniting inflation, while employment dynamics can influence demand, wage pressures, and the broader inflation outlook.
Andreessen will serve as one of the task force’s leaders, joining Charles I. Jones and Asha Sharma. Jones is a Stanford economics professor currently on leave at Anthropic. Sharma brings experience from large-scale technology and consumer platform operations through her role at Microsoft and Xbox. The Fed described the effort as a way to strengthen its policymaking inputs as new technologies evolve.
Warsh’s broader push: five task forces across policy operations
The Productivity and Jobs group is one of five task forces launched under new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh. In separate workstreams, the other teams will examine policy communication, balance sheet policy, data quality, and inflation frameworks.
Warsh revealed the leadership-driven reorganization and the creation of the five task forces during a June 17 press conference. He characterized the topics as timely and consequential and said each group would be independently led by leading experts “both inside and outside the economics profession.”
The chair also indicated the Fed intends to publish policy statements and guidance in shorter, clearer language—an operational shift that could affect how markets interpret Fed decisions and guidance going forward.
How Fed thinking on AI inflation differs
The Fed’s decision to dedicate a task force to technology and jobs arrives amid an ongoing debate inside the central bank about AI’s macroeconomic effects—particularly whether AI is ultimately inflationary or disinflationary.
In a May 27 speech, Governor Lisa Cook said she expects AI to further “boost productivity growth,” contributing to her view that GDP will grow robustly. At the same time, she noted AI carries the risk of “higher inflation,” reflecting concerns that the near-term costs of adopting and building AI infrastructure could feed into prices before productivity gains fully materialize. (Governor Cook’s remarks were delivered in a May 27 speech.)
Former Fed Chair Jerome Powell has also pointed to the inflationary pressure that can come from data center spending. In statements from March 2026 referenced by the Fed, Powell said that data center investment is putting pressure on goods and services and is “probably pushing inflation up at the margin.” The implication is that even if AI later reduces costs through productivity, the path to that outcome may involve heightened demand in the near term—complicating monetary policy timing.
Taken together, the internal split underscores why a labor-and-productivity task force could be significant: employment effects can influence wage growth and consumption, while productivity trajectories influence the economy’s supply side. AI adoption may therefore shift both the demand and supply sides of the inflation equation—just not necessarily in the same direction or at the same speed.
What Andreessen’s appointment signals for the Fed’s tech outreach
Marc Andreessen co-founded Andreessen Horowitz, which the Fed-focused article context describes as a major backer of both crypto and AI startups. While the Fed’s task force is not a statement of endorsement for any technology, the appointment highlights how the central bank is increasingly drawing on expertise from the technology and investment ecosystem as AI moves from research to large-scale deployment.
The connections between Warsh and Andreessen also extend beyond this new role. Earlier reporting tied Warsh and Andreessen to their days at Stanford in the early 1990s, and a CNBC interview from April 2026 cited Warsh describing both Andreessen and Palantir’s Peter Thiel as friends from college. Andreessen also publicly backed Warsh’s Fed chair nomination in a Jan. 30 X post following the nomination, writing that he has known Warsh for 30 years and that Warsh combines insight in economics and finance with an understanding of technology and business. Those remarks were posted by Andreessen on X at the time and are linked through the original coverage (see this post).
For investors and market participants, the more practical takeaway is not personal networking but the Fed’s evolving approach to gathering inputs: a central bank tasked with managing inflation and employment in a high-tech economy may find it increasingly difficult to rely only on traditional econometric relationships, especially when the cost structure and labor implications of AI can evolve quickly.
Going forward, the main thing to watch is how the Productivity and Jobs task force translates its findings into usable policymaking inputs—particularly whether it can better distinguish between near-term price pressures tied to AI investment and longer-term disinflationary effects driven by productivity. With the Fed already split on AI’s direction of travel, the task force’s work could become a key reference point for how officials assess the inflation outlook in the months ahead.
This article was originally published as Andreessen Appointee Brings Fed Role to A16z Amid AI Policy Shift on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.
14
Article
Les États-Unis déposent des accusations contre un détenu pour blanchiment présumé de cryptomonnaie Kraken saisieDes procureurs américains ont porté de nouvelles accusations pénales contre Rossen Iossifov, un ressortissant bulgare déjà incarcéré dans une prison fédérale, l’accusant d’avoir aidé à déplacer et à blanchir environ 290 000 dollars en cryptomonnaie liée à une ordonnance de confiscation prononcée par un tribunal. Le Département de la Justice indique que les faits allégués se sont produits en janvier 2024, après qu’un tribunal fédéral avait ordonné la confiscation des avoirs à la suite de la condamnation antérieure d’Iossifov.
Selon le DOJ, la cryptomonnaie était stockée sur un compte Kraken enregistré au nom d’Iossifov, qui avait été placé sous restriction pendant l’enquête. Les procureurs allèguent qu’il aurait, avec d’autres personnes, retiré et transféré les actifs en utilisant des services de mélange et des plateformes d’échange de cryptomonnaies afin d’obscurcir la piste—avant que le gouvernement puisse en prendre possession.
Les États-Unis déposent des accusations contre un détenu pour blanchiment présumé de cryptomonnaie Kraken saisie
Des procureurs américains ont porté de nouvelles accusations pénales contre Rossen Iossifov, un ressortissant bulgare déjà incarcéré dans une prison fédérale, l’accusant d’avoir aidé à déplacer et à blanchir environ 290 000 dollars en cryptomonnaie liée à une ordonnance de confiscation prononcée par un tribunal. Le Département de la Justice indique que les faits allégués se sont produits en janvier 2024, après qu’un tribunal fédéral avait ordonné la confiscation des avoirs à la suite de la condamnation antérieure d’Iossifov.
Selon le DOJ, la cryptomonnaie était stockée sur un compte Kraken enregistré au nom d’Iossifov, qui avait été placé sous restriction pendant l’enquête. Les procureurs allèguent qu’il aurait, avec d’autres personnes, retiré et transféré les actifs en utilisant des services de mélange et des plateformes d’échange de cryptomonnaies afin d’obscurcir la piste—avant que le gouvernement puisse en prendre possession.
Selon le DOJ, la cryptomonnaie était stockée sur un compte Kraken enregistré au nom d’Iossifov, qui avait été placé sous restriction pendant l’enquête. Les procureurs allèguent qu’il aurait, avec d’autres personnes, retiré et transféré les actifs en utilisant des services de mélange et des plateformes d’échange de cryptomonnaies afin d’obscurcir la piste—avant que le gouvernement puisse en prendre possession.
38
Article
Les banques de Wall Street resserrent les règles sur les marchés de prédiction en raison de craintes liées aux informations privilégiéesSelon des informations de CNBC, de grandes banques d’investissement américaines renforcent leurs règles internes concernant le trading sur les marchés de prédiction. Le changement est motivé par des inquiétudes selon lesquelles des employés pourraient utiliser des informations non publiques lors du trading de contrats fondés sur des événements — un sujet qui a suscité de plus en plus d’attention de la part des autorités de régulation et des milieux politiques aux États-Unis.
CNBC affirme que Goldman Sachs aurait, semble-t-il, interdit à ses employés de trader certains contrats d’événements liés à la banque, dont ceux portant sur les marchés financiers, l’évolution de la conjoncture macroéconomique, les élections et la géopolitique. Dans le même temps, Morgan Stanley et Bank of America ont également défini des restrictions pour les employés, ou sont en train de les préparer, ce qui reflète à quel point les marchés prédictifs sont passés rapidement d’une idée de niche à un domaine que les régulateurs et les décideurs politiques sont prêts à examiner.
Les banques de Wall Street resserrent les règles sur les marchés de prédiction en raison de craintes liées aux informations privilégiées
Selon des informations de CNBC, de grandes banques d’investissement américaines renforcent leurs règles internes concernant le trading sur les marchés de prédiction. Le changement est motivé par des inquiétudes selon lesquelles des employés pourraient utiliser des informations non publiques lors du trading de contrats fondés sur des événements — un sujet qui a suscité de plus en plus d’attention de la part des autorités de régulation et des milieux politiques aux États-Unis.
CNBC affirme que Goldman Sachs aurait, semble-t-il, interdit à ses employés de trader certains contrats d’événements liés à la banque, dont ceux portant sur les marchés financiers, l’évolution de la conjoncture macroéconomique, les élections et la géopolitique. Dans le même temps, Morgan Stanley et Bank of America ont également défini des restrictions pour les employés, ou sont en train de les préparer, ce qui reflète à quel point les marchés prédictifs sont passés rapidement d’une idée de niche à un domaine que les régulateurs et les décideurs politiques sont prêts à examiner.
CNBC affirme que Goldman Sachs aurait, semble-t-il, interdit à ses employés de trader certains contrats d’événements liés à la banque, dont ceux portant sur les marchés financiers, l’évolution de la conjoncture macroéconomique, les élections et la géopolitique. Dans le même temps, Morgan Stanley et Bank of America ont également défini des restrictions pour les employés, ou sont en train de les préparer, ce qui reflète à quel point les marchés prédictifs sont passés rapidement d’une idée de niche à un domaine que les régulateurs et les décideurs politiques sont prêts à examiner.
36
Article
TeraWulf envisage un financement par dette de 3,5 Md$ pour un DC lié à Anthropic : rapportLe mineur de bitcoins coté aux États-Unis et exploitant d’infrastructures d’hébergement TeraWulf explorerait une importante formule de financement par la dette visant à développer son campus Justified Data au Kentucky, un site lié à une demande de calcul liée au long terme pour l’IA grâce à un bail avec Anthropic.
Selon un rapport de Bloomberg publié un jeudi, le directeur financier de TeraWulf, Patrick Fleury, a déclaré que la société devrait chercher à lever 3,5 milliards de dollars de financement par la dette, avec Morgan Stanley, la banque d’investissement, à la tête des opérations. Le financement est décrit comme pouvant inclure des prêts à effet de levier et des obligations à haut rendement — la première incursion de TeraWulf sur le marché des prêts à effet de levier.
TeraWulf envisage un financement par dette de 3,5 Md$ pour un DC lié à Anthropic : rapport
Le mineur de bitcoins coté aux États-Unis et exploitant d’infrastructures d’hébergement TeraWulf explorerait une importante formule de financement par la dette visant à développer son campus Justified Data au Kentucky, un site lié à une demande de calcul liée au long terme pour l’IA grâce à un bail avec Anthropic.
Selon un rapport de Bloomberg publié un jeudi, le directeur financier de TeraWulf, Patrick Fleury, a déclaré que la société devrait chercher à lever 3,5 milliards de dollars de financement par la dette, avec Morgan Stanley, la banque d’investissement, à la tête des opérations. Le financement est décrit comme pouvant inclure des prêts à effet de levier et des obligations à haut rendement — la première incursion de TeraWulf sur le marché des prêts à effet de levier.
Selon un rapport de Bloomberg publié un jeudi, le directeur financier de TeraWulf, Patrick Fleury, a déclaré que la société devrait chercher à lever 3,5 milliards de dollars de financement par la dette, avec Morgan Stanley, la banque d’investissement, à la tête des opérations. Le financement est décrit comme pouvant inclure des prêts à effet de levier et des obligations à haut rendement — la première incursion de TeraWulf sur le marché des prêts à effet de levier.
66
Article
Metaplanet teste du crédit numérique adossé à Bitcoin avec JPYC au JaponMetaplanet, une société d’investissement basée au Japon, surtout connue pour avoir constitué une importante réserve de Bitcoin, affirme qu’elle commande une étude conjointe sur des produits de crédit numériques adossés à Bitcoin dans le pays. La recherche relie l’activité titres de Metaplanet, Metaplanet Securities, l’émetteur de stablecoin JPYC, et le prestataire d’infrastructure de tokenisation Progmatia, dans le but de tester si le Bitcoin peut servir de garantie et d’amélioration de crédit pour des instruments de crédit tokenisés.
Dans un dossier partagé par Metaplanet vendredi, l’entreprise a présenté un concept dans lequel le BTC serait utilisé aux côtés de JPY Coin (JPYC) — une stablecoin adossée au yen japonais — pour le règlement et les paiements. Des jetons de sécurité seraient ensuite utilisés pour gérer les droits des détenteurs. Metaplanet a souligné que le travail est exploratoire et qu’aucun lancement de produit n’est prévu dans le cadre de cette étude.
Metaplanet teste du crédit numérique adossé à Bitcoin avec JPYC au Japon
Metaplanet, une société d’investissement basée au Japon, surtout connue pour avoir constitué une importante réserve de Bitcoin, affirme qu’elle commande une étude conjointe sur des produits de crédit numériques adossés à Bitcoin dans le pays. La recherche relie l’activité titres de Metaplanet, Metaplanet Securities, l’émetteur de stablecoin JPYC, et le prestataire d’infrastructure de tokenisation Progmatia, dans le but de tester si le Bitcoin peut servir de garantie et d’amélioration de crédit pour des instruments de crédit tokenisés.
Dans un dossier partagé par Metaplanet vendredi, l’entreprise a présenté un concept dans lequel le BTC serait utilisé aux côtés de JPY Coin (JPYC) — une stablecoin adossée au yen japonais — pour le règlement et les paiements. Des jetons de sécurité seraient ensuite utilisés pour gérer les droits des détenteurs. Metaplanet a souligné que le travail est exploratoire et qu’aucun lancement de produit n’est prévu dans le cadre de cette étude.
Dans un dossier partagé par Metaplanet vendredi, l’entreprise a présenté un concept dans lequel le BTC serait utilisé aux côtés de JPY Coin (JPYC) — une stablecoin adossée au yen japonais — pour le règlement et les paiements. Des jetons de sécurité seraient ensuite utilisés pour gérer les droits des détenteurs. Metaplanet a souligné que le travail est exploratoire et qu’aucun lancement de produit n’est prévu dans le cadre de cette étude.
36
Connectez-vous pour découvrir plus de contenu
Rejoignez la communauté mondiale des adeptes de cryptomonnaies sur Binance Square
⚡️ Suviez les dernières informations importantes sur les cryptomonnaies.
💬 Jugé digne de confiance par la plus grande plateforme d’échange de cryptomonnaies au monde.
👍 Découvrez les connaissances que partagent les créateurs vérifiés.
Adresse e-mail/Nº de téléphone
Sujets d’actualité
Bitcoin$60K$70KRangeHits307DayConsolidation
0 vues
160 mentions
#Bitcoin$60K$70KRangeHits307DayConsolidation 🚨 Bitcoin a maintenant passé 307 jours à osciller entre 60 000 $ et 70 000 $.
Les consolidations prolongées conduisent souvent à de grosses cassures. 👀
Dans quel sens, selon vous, le BTC va-t-il évoluer ensuite ? 🚀📉
#Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto $BTC
raj1177
·3 mentions J’aime
·355 vues
BitcoinRetestsKeyResistanceAt$64400
0 vues
131 mentions
SKHynixToExpandADRIssuance
0 vues
262 mentions