Sometimes I wonder whether I’m looking at
@Dusk s in the wrong place. The price
@Dusk is only the most visible part—so what is this token actually doing behind the scenes on the network?
I came across a rather interesting datapoint: about $211M DUSK is being staked out of a total of 1B tokens. However, that ratio isn’t enough to reflect whether the network is truly active, because a lot of tokens being locked doesn’t necessarily mean higher activity on-chain.
What interests me more is the role of this amount
$DUSK within the network’s own design.
What I noticed in
#dusk is how new tokens are introduced to the market: currently about 19.86 DUSK appears after every block, and this figure will halve every 4 years. I also find it worth comparing two approaches side by side: the earlier plan pushed the 1B supply timeframe to around 2050, while the new direction splits the emission reduction process into stages. That structure provides a relative advantage for early participants, while the speed of supply replenishment gradually slows down
I still can’t read the full story behind this 211M DUSK figure
Is this amount of tokens being kept to optimize rewards, or is it reflecting an increase in demand for using the Dusk network?
This becomes even more noteworthy as Dusk is building a foundation for secure smart contracts and products serving the financial market—so it’s definitely worth considering
To this day, I still don’t have enough basis to know whether the increase in staking goes hand in hand with activity on Dusk. If anyone has followed
@Dusk throughout the past year and saved data about validators, transactions, or staking, I’d really like to see those numbers.
$BLESS $BEAT #SamsungToAnnounceNewShareholderReturnPlanFriday #TinFed