intents

$NEAR is being spread with FUD because it has prevented money laundering by hackers from funds stolen from Bitget?😳

Somehow NEAR is actually not permissionless.

Context:

- Bitget was hacked for a large wallet on September 24.
- $387.5 million from the fund was affected.
- they tried to use NEAR Intents to launder money

According to the report from @NEAR Protocol :

$50 million in suspicious fund flows related to the hacker attempted to use NEAR Intents

- $166 thousand got through
- $503 thousand was blocked during execution

most of the remaining attempts were rejected before the swap transactions could be completed

NEAR released a report explaining how SHIELD, their risk monitoring system, detected suspicious activity.

Their position is pretty clear: “Permissionless doesn’t mean neutral.”

NEAR Intents, NEAR’s base blockchain, and Confidential Intents are three different things.

- SHIELD operates at the Intent execution layer.

It can deny quotes for a swap transaction, reject suspicious fund flows, or stop funds that are already in an execution process that has not been completed.

It cannot freeze someone’s entire Ethereum wallet or reverse a transaction on every blockchain.

NEAR has promoted Confidential Intents, enabling financial activity to be executed privately, with selective disclosure and risk screening.

It’s a security model very different from Monero or Zcash $ZEC

the idea that NEAR suddenly could freeze every wallet on its blockchain just because Intents rejected stolen funds is a pretty far-fetched misunderstanding of the architecture.

What an industry.

According to IMO, this isn’t a reason to FUD 😁
#NEAR🚀🚀🚀 #intents #zcash

$NEWT IS SHIFTING FROM INSTRUCTIONS TO INTENT — HERE'S WHY IT MATTERS 🔥

When you tell Newton to move funds, you're not giving instructions — you're delegating intent. The key difference? With intent, execution decisions leave your hands but stay inside a cryptographically enforced boundary. That boundary makes "going rogue" computationally impossible, not just trust-based.

I'm watching one thing closely: real on-chain usage volume of AI agents built on intent delegation, not demo apps. That line is the signal between hype and infrastructure.

What timeline do you see for intent-first finance going mainstream?

Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.

#NEWT #Intents #AIAgents #DeFiAlpha

🔥

🚀 $NEAR Intents just smashed a MASSIVE all-time volume milestone!

💥 $18,973,820,933 – and counting.

The intent-based architecture is proving its power, driving seamless cross-chain execution at scale. Big things are brewing for @near 🔥

📈 This is just the beginning.

#NEAR #Intents #DeFiVolume

$NEAR INTENTS PROTOCOL HITS $22.8B VOLUME BEFORE INCENTIVES 🚀

$22.8 billion in transaction volume — with the first $20 billion processed before any token incentives were introduced. That’s $35 million in user fees generated by 550,000 active wallets in the past 30 days alone. The majority comes from regular stablecoin flows across dozens of chains.

This flips the typical DeFi playbook: real product, real volume, then incentives — not the other way around. The structural demand here is hard to ignore. Does this change your view on NEAR’s long-term positioning?

Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.

#NEAR #Intents #DeFi #RealVolume

🎯

For years, the decentralized user experience has been deeply hostile to mainstream adoption.

If you wanted to buy an asset on a different network, you were forced to manually bridge capital, calculate slippage across multiple decentralized exchanges, configure new RPC endpoints in your wallet, and somehow acquire a native token just to pay the gas fees. You had to understand the underlying infrastructure of the blockchain simply to execute a basic financial transaction. It was the equivalent of needing to understand TCP/IP protocols just to send an email.

Intent-centric architecture and chain abstraction are completely eliminating this friction.

Instead of forcing users to submit step-by-step technical instructions, this new framework allows you to simply declare your desired outcome. You sign a single "intent" stating you want a specific asset at a specific price, and a decentralized network of sophisticated solvers instantly competes to execute the complex routing, bridging, and gas payments behind the scenes.

We are finally shifting from a fragmented, developer-focused environment to a unified, consumer-grade financial system. By completely abstracting the blockchain away from the end user, these orchestration layers are unlocking the liquidity and usability required to onboard the next hundred million users.

$COW $PARTI $ACX
#Write2Earn #intents

𝗪𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘀, 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗻 @𝗻𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗹 Been watching for weeks: cross-chain intent swaps that settle BTC/SOL/XRP without the usual bottleneck, real revenue, open code, paradigm shift ⚠️ Alpha: NEAR runs the threshold-signing keys game changer, not just UX

#nearprotocol #Intents #Crypto

$NEAR was up 11% in a day! Solana infrastructure bigwig goes to work for NEAR—what signal does this send? 🔥🚀

Put simply, this was the hottest topic on the feed today: $NEAR surged 11% in a day, and #NEARRisesNearly10% shot straight onto the trending list, with 35,000 views and 285 people arguing about it.

What are they arguing about? Helius CEO Mert joined the NEAR Foundation Council. This isn’t some honorary title—the Council oversees NEAR’s top-level decisions, essentially acting as its board of directors. Who is this guy? Helius is a leading infrastructure provider in the Solana ecosystem. Phantom, Jupiter, and Coinbase all use its nodes and RPC. In other words: one of Solana’s top players has gone over to NEAR to lend his name and expertise.

I’ve said it before: don’t talk about loyalty between chains—it all comes down to where the traffic and money are going. NEAR Intents has racked up $33 billion in cumulative trading volume, and privacy TVL has topped $160 million. That’s why Mert was willing to lend his name. “Unified cross-chain liquidity” is the narrative; the numbers are what give it substance.

But don’t ignore the risks—I’ll still pour some cold water on this: earlier this month, NEAR Intents was just hit by a $3.8 million exploit. A deposit and withdrawal vulnerability brought all 11 chains to a halt. The bug was fixed and they said everyone was fully compensated, but the history is right there. This 11% move is sentiment driven by the news, not a fundamental turnaround.

So where do I stand at this price? I buy the logic, but I’m not chasing the rally. $NEAR is the narrative, $SOL is the infrastructure, and Mert has connected the two—that’s what you call a real “cross-chain veteran.” If this money really flows into Intents, NEAR’s value proposition will be on a whole different level.

I don’t know whether the folks at $SOL are panicking, but I’ve got one thing figured out: for the next narrative, cross-chain aggregators are worth waiting to buy on a pullback.

Which side are you betting on? Let the arguments begin in the comments 👇

#NEAR #Solana #CryptoNews #Intents

Smart money is completely abandoning manual execution and aggressively funding intent-centric architecture.

Instead of dictating how a transaction happens, users simply cryptographically sign what they want the outcome to be. Sophisticated off-chain solvers and decentralized market makers then compete in the background to execute that exact intent, absorbing all the gas routing, MEV protection, and bridging complexity.

This is the exact UX flip required to trigger mass adoption. The protocols actively abstracting away the underlying blockchain layer and turning complex cross-chain execution into a single-click, zero-gas experience are quietly capturing the most valuable order flow in the digital economy.

$COW $1INCH $UNI
#Write2Earn #defi #intents #Web3

$NEAR INTENTS SETTLED $1.5B IN ZEC – PRIVACY IS IN DEMAND 🔥

Within weeks of launching, 42% of all transaction volume on NEAR Intents used Confidential Mode — that's users voting with their clicks. Over $1.5 billion in ZEC has settled through the platform, with daily anonymous TVL now exceeding $30 million.

This isn't a niche feature. When given the choice, nearly half of volume chooses privacy. That's a real signal for where on-chain demand is heading.

Would you pay a slightly higher fee for privacy in crypto transactions?

Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.

#NEAR #Privacy #ZEC #Intents #Crypto

🔥

$NEAR JUST INTEGRATED STRIPE FOR AI PAYMENTS — THIS IS HUGE 🔥

NEAR Intents now live on Stripe's Machine Payment Protocol and Tempo. AI agents can pay with any asset on any chain, while sellers get settled in their preferred token. This plugs NEAR directly into one of the world's largest payment gateways.

The 1Click Swap API handles the cross-chain swap under the hood. Real use case for AI-driven finance — no more manual bridging or token management. Volume on NEAR Intents has been climbing since the announcement.

Do you see AI agents becoming the default payment method on-chain this cycle?

Not financial advice. Always manage your risk.

#NEAR #AI #CryptoPayments #Stripe #Intents

🔥

The foundational architecture of decentralized transactions is completely backward. Currently, the user is forced to act as their own algorithmic routing engine. If you want to move capital from one network to another to capture a specific yield, you must manually execute a chaotic sequence of approvals, network bridges, and decentralized swaps, paying gas fees and assuming maximum execution risk at every single step. Institutional capital will never adopt a system where a single routing error results in the permanent loss of funds.

Smart money is actively funding the massive structural migration toward Intent-Centric Architecture. This is not a user interface tweak; it is a fundamental redesign of how cryptographic settlement functions.

Instead of dictating how a transaction should happen, the user simply signs an "intent"—a cryptographically secure declaration of the exact outcome they want (e.g., "I want 100 Ethereum on Arbitrum, and I am willing to pay exactly 300,000 USDC on Optimism"). Immediately, a decentralized, hyper-competitive network of algorithmic "solvers" races to find the absolute most efficient path to fulfill that exact request across all chains and liquidity pools.

The smart contract mathematically guarantees that the transaction only executes if the user's exact parameters are met. The solver takes on 100% of the bridging, routing, and slippage risk, while the user simply receives the perfect outcome. The protocols successfully building these decentralized solver networks and intent execution layers are quietly transforming the blockchain from a manual, high-friction maze into an intelligent, outcome-driven financial engine.

$COW $1INCH $UNI

#Write2Earn #intents #defi #Web3

Yes, $NEAR will perform fiercely this year

THE NEXT big goals are levels 2 and 3 in the first quarter, which means passing level 2 in the next few weeks and securing in a new range.

For long lovers, I will make a setup and share it soon, and for now, you can just take 100-200 NIR to observe or set limit orders at your discretion with a small leverage on cross margin so that even the liquidation price is not visible.

#NEAR

P.S. Your assignment for homework is to study the basic understanding of what Near #Intents is, how it works, and what the development prospects are.