#neutron
neutron
78,400 views
142 Discussing
Hot
Latest
·
--
#Cosmos #Neutron $ATOM A total of 1.227 million ATOM involved in a case were moved into a recovery multisig—sounds like “successful asset recovery.” But for affected users, the more critical questions are: Who controls the money now, and when will it be returned, under what rules? My view is that this action completed one step of risk containment, but it did not complete compensation.
First, separate the two networks. On September 22, the attacker gained partial control of the governance process over certain protocol contract management and withdrew assets; about 1.73 million ATOM were then sent to Cosmos Hub. The Hub itself wasn’t breached, but validators coordinated a halt in block production to prevent the remaining ATOM involved in the incident from being transferred out. After about 24.5 hours of downtime, the Hub restarted at 12:00 UTC on September 23. At 12:06, a one-time state change moved the attacker’s remaining 1,227,121 ATOM into a multisig address controlled by four of the six signees—only those signatures could unlock it. This was an action disclosed by Cosmos Labs in their September 25 post-incident review of the Hub side; it does not mean the funds have already returned to the victims’ accounts.
Another transaction makes the boundaries clearer: about 168,991 ATOM came from an earlier THORChain refund. Only after the restart did it reach the attacker’s address, after which it flowed out again. The postmortem explanation is that validators approved a one-time modification transferring the address’s existing balance at the stopped height, but it did not authorize any indefinite automatic deductions for future inbound funds. This loss exposure shows the limitations of the emergency response plan—and it also illustrates that “being able to change on-chain state” doesn’t automatically mean “being able to recover all cross-chain assets.”
I think what’s truly worth debating is not labeling this response as simply “centralized” or “heroic rescue,” but whether the emergency powers can be kept clearly bounded and auditable after the fact. Pausing the entire Hub carries real availability costs; even though the change targets only a single address, it still represents extraordinary authority. The good side is that the post-incident review publicly disclosed the target address, the amounts, the signers, and the patching process using a vote with more than two-thirds of voting power. The incomplete side is that the Neutron affected parties still need to propose an allocation plan; the multisig signers say funds will be moved out only after authorization via a Cosmos Hub governance proposal, and any differences in the patch source code still need to be disclosed.
So the next step, as I see it, is to verify three things: how Neutron’s full incident report defines the harmed accounts; how the Hub governance proposal explicitly states the basis for collecting/receiving funds; and whether the multisig withdrawals can be matched one-by-one with the final incoming settlement. If those records are fully and transparently published, I would raise my assessment of this emergency governance. If it remains long-term at “the funds have been kept,” then it can’t be called compensation already received by users. Would you accept a chain pausing and altering the on-chain state to preserve the involved assets? If so, to what point would you require post-incident disclosure?
#Cosmos #Neutron $ATOM A total of 1.227 million ATOM involved in a case were moved into a recovery multisig—sounds like “successful asset recovery.” But for affected users, the more critical questions are: Who controls the money now, and when will it be returned, under what rules? My view is that this action completed one step of risk containment, but it did not complete compensation.
First, separate the two networks. On September 22, the attacker gained partial control of the governance process over certain protocol contract management and withdrew assets; about 1.73 million ATOM were then sent to Cosmos Hub. The Hub itself wasn’t breached, but validators coordinated a halt in block production to prevent the remaining ATOM involved in the incident from being transferred out. After about 24.5 hours of downtime, the Hub restarted at 12:00 UTC on September 23. At 12:06, a one-time state change moved the attacker’s remaining 1,227,121 ATOM into a multisig address controlled by four of the six signees—only those signatures could unlock it. This was an action disclosed by Cosmos Labs in their September 25 post-incident review of the Hub side; it does not mean the funds have already returned to the victims’ accounts.
Another transaction makes the boundaries clearer: about 168,991 ATOM came from an earlier THORChain refund. Only after the restart did it reach the attacker’s address, after which it flowed out again. The postmortem explanation is that validators approved a one-time modification transferring the address’s existing balance at the stopped height, but it did not authorize any indefinite automatic deductions for future inbound funds. This loss exposure shows the limitations of the emergency response plan—and it also illustrates that “being able to change on-chain state” doesn’t automatically mean “being able to recover all cross-chain assets.”
I think what’s truly worth debating is not labeling this response as simply “centralized” or “heroic rescue,” but whether the emergency powers can be kept clearly bounded and auditable after the fact. Pausing the entire Hub carries real availability costs; even though the change targets only a single address, it still represents extraordinary authority. The good side is that the post-incident review publicly disclosed the target address, the amounts, the signers, and the patching process using a vote with more than two-thirds of voting power. The incomplete side is that the Neutron affected parties still need to propose an allocation plan; the multisig signers say funds will be moved out only after authorization via a Cosmos Hub governance proposal, and any differences in the patch source code still need to be disclosed.
So the next step, as I see it, is to verify three things: how Neutron’s full incident report defines the harmed accounts; how the Hub governance proposal explicitly states the basis for collecting/receiving funds; and whether the multisig withdrawals can be matched one-by-one with the final incoming settlement. If those records are fully and transparently published, I would raise my assessment of this emergency governance. If it remains long-term at “the funds have been kept,” then it can’t be called compensation already received by users. Would you accept a chain pausing and altering the on-chain state to preserve the involved assets? If so, to what point would you require post-incident disclosure?
First, separate the two networks. On September 22, the attacker gained partial control of the governance process over certain protocol contract management and withdrew assets; about 1.73 million ATOM were then sent to Cosmos Hub. The Hub itself wasn’t breached, but validators coordinated a halt in block production to prevent the remaining ATOM involved in the incident from being transferred out. After about 24.5 hours of downtime, the Hub restarted at 12:00 UTC on September 23. At 12:06, a one-time state change moved the attacker’s remaining 1,227,121 ATOM into a multisig address controlled by four of the six signees—only those signatures could unlock it. This was an action disclosed by Cosmos Labs in their September 25 post-incident review of the Hub side; it does not mean the funds have already returned to the victims’ accounts.
Another transaction makes the boundaries clearer: about 168,991 ATOM came from an earlier THORChain refund. Only after the restart did it reach the attacker’s address, after which it flowed out again. The postmortem explanation is that validators approved a one-time modification transferring the address’s existing balance at the stopped height, but it did not authorize any indefinite automatic deductions for future inbound funds. This loss exposure shows the limitations of the emergency response plan—and it also illustrates that “being able to change on-chain state” doesn’t automatically mean “being able to recover all cross-chain assets.”
I think what’s truly worth debating is not labeling this response as simply “centralized” or “heroic rescue,” but whether the emergency powers can be kept clearly bounded and auditable after the fact. Pausing the entire Hub carries real availability costs; even though the change targets only a single address, it still represents extraordinary authority. The good side is that the post-incident review publicly disclosed the target address, the amounts, the signers, and the patching process using a vote with more than two-thirds of voting power. The incomplete side is that the Neutron affected parties still need to propose an allocation plan; the multisig signers say funds will be moved out only after authorization via a Cosmos Hub governance proposal, and any differences in the patch source code still need to be disclosed.
So the next step, as I see it, is to verify three things: how Neutron’s full incident report defines the harmed accounts; how the Hub governance proposal explicitly states the basis for collecting/receiving funds; and whether the multisig withdrawals can be matched one-by-one with the final incoming settlement. If those records are fully and transparently published, I would raise my assessment of this emergency governance. If it remains long-term at “the funds have been kept,” then it can’t be called compensation already received by users. Would you accept a chain pausing and altering the on-chain state to preserve the involved assets? If so, to what point would you require post-incident disclosure?
1
191
·
--
Cosmos Hub: $1.22M ATOM moved into a multisig; attacker proposal rejectedAfter the governance attack on Neutron, the top reaction on hot search was: “Cosmos has also been hacked.”
No. The Hub itself wasn’t breached, and user funds weren’t moved. What was swept away was the attacker’s dirty money that came in through a bridge.
Cosmos Labs Sept 25 official recap: After Sept 22 Neutron governance attack drained liquidity from protocols such as Astroport and others, about $1.73M in ATOM was sent to the Hub. Validators were halted for roughly 24.5 hours; when Gaia v28.3.0 restarted, it moved the remaining ~1.227M ATOM into the 4/6 multisig (Nansen / Keplr / Enigma / Silknodes / Kiln / Polkachu) in one go. About $500K ATOM was already converted to $ETH via THORChain and cannot be tracked; after the restart, another ~169K ATOM was refunded and slipped away.
Cosmos Hub: $1.22M ATOM moved into a multisig; attacker proposal rejected
After the governance attack on Neutron, the top reaction on hot search was: “Cosmos has also been hacked.”
No. The Hub itself wasn’t breached, and user funds weren’t moved. What was swept away was the attacker’s dirty money that came in through a bridge.
Cosmos Labs Sept 25 official recap: After Sept 22 Neutron governance attack drained liquidity from protocols such as Astroport and others, about $1.73M in ATOM was sent to the Hub. Validators were halted for roughly 24.5 hours; when Gaia v28.3.0 restarted, it moved the remaining ~1.227M ATOM into the 4/6 multisig (Nansen / Keplr / Enigma / Silknodes / Kiln / Polkachu) in one go. About $500K ATOM was already converted to $ETH via THORChain and cannot be tracked; after the restart, another ~169K ATOM was refunded and slipped away.
No. The Hub itself wasn’t breached, and user funds weren’t moved. What was swept away was the attacker’s dirty money that came in through a bridge.
Cosmos Labs Sept 25 official recap: After Sept 22 Neutron governance attack drained liquidity from protocols such as Astroport and others, about $1.73M in ATOM was sent to the Hub. Validators were halted for roughly 24.5 hours; when Gaia v28.3.0 restarted, it moved the remaining ~1.227M ATOM into the 4/6 multisig (Nansen / Keplr / Enigma / Silknodes / Kiln / Polkachu) in one go. About $500K ATOM was already converted to $ETH via THORChain and cannot be tracked; after the restart, another ~169K ATOM was refunded and slipped away.
104
·
--
🚨 Neutron governance proposal manipulated; attacker stole about $4.4 million.
Cosmos Hub validators have coordinated to halt the chain and attempt to recover the funds.
#Neutron #CosmosHub #治理攻击 #cryptocurrency
🚨 Neutron governance proposal manipulated; attacker stole about $4.4 million.
Cosmos Hub validators have coordinated to halt the chain and attempt to recover the funds.
#Neutron #CosmosHub #治理攻击 #cryptocurrency
Cosmos Hub validators have coordinated to halt the chain and attempt to recover the funds.
#Neutron #CosmosHub #治理攻击 #cryptocurrency
102
·
--
LAB ($LAB) The recent market sentiment is weak for two main reasons: first, Neutron's launch window has been further pushed back to 2027, and the project’s progress pace is slower than market expectations; second, about a 2% pullback appeared in the U.S. stock after-hours session, causing overall risk appetite to weaken and shaking investor confidence.
From the data perspective, the current price for $LAB is around $0.1235, with about $10.33 million in trading volume over the past 24 hours and a market cap of roughly $56.21 million. In the near term, the combination of the rocket delay and the drag from U.S. stocks creates a double headwind, and the price is likely to remain under pressure.
It’s worth noting that the Neutron rocket is a mid-to-long-term narrative. After short-term sentiment has been released, the market’s focus will shift back to the project’s actual delivery timeline and ecosystem progress. The rocket space story may be exciting, but since execution timelines are being extended, valuation expectations need to be repriced.
From an execution standpoint, before the direction becomes clear, it’s not advisable to blindly bottom-pick. You can watch for two signals: first, whether the price can stabilize within the current range alongside declining trading volume; second, whether the project team provides a clearer milestone schedule.
Risk warning: crypto assets are highly volatile. The above is only personal observation and does not constitute any investment advice. Please DYOR and manage your position size accordingly.
#LAB#crypto market#Neutron
LAB ($LAB ) The recent market sentiment is weak for two main reasons: first, Neutron's launch window has been further pushed back to 2027, and the project’s progress pace is slower than market expectations; second, about a 2% pullback appeared in the U.S. stock after-hours session, causing overall risk appetite to weaken and shaking investor confidence.
From the data perspective, the current price for $LAB is around $0.1235, with about $10.33 million in trading volume over the past 24 hours and a market cap of roughly $56.21 million. In the near term, the combination of the rocket delay and the drag from U.S. stocks creates a double headwind, and the price is likely to remain under pressure.
It’s worth noting that the Neutron rocket is a mid-to-long-term narrative. After short-term sentiment has been released, the market’s focus will shift back to the project’s actual delivery timeline and ecosystem progress. The rocket space story may be exciting, but since execution timelines are being extended, valuation expectations need to be repriced.
From an execution standpoint, before the direction becomes clear, it’s not advisable to blindly bottom-pick. You can watch for two signals: first, whether the price can stabilize within the current range alongside declining trading volume; second, whether the project team provides a clearer milestone schedule.
Risk warning: crypto assets are highly volatile. The above is only personal observation and does not constitute any investment advice. Please DYOR and manage your position size accordingly.
#LAB#crypto market#Neutron
From the data perspective, the current price for $LAB is around $0.1235, with about $10.33 million in trading volume over the past 24 hours and a market cap of roughly $56.21 million. In the near term, the combination of the rocket delay and the drag from U.S. stocks creates a double headwind, and the price is likely to remain under pressure.
It’s worth noting that the Neutron rocket is a mid-to-long-term narrative. After short-term sentiment has been released, the market’s focus will shift back to the project’s actual delivery timeline and ecosystem progress. The rocket space story may be exciting, but since execution timelines are being extended, valuation expectations need to be repriced.
From an execution standpoint, before the direction becomes clear, it’s not advisable to blindly bottom-pick. You can watch for two signals: first, whether the price can stabilize within the current range alongside declining trading volume; second, whether the project team provides a clearer milestone schedule.
Risk warning: crypto assets are highly volatile. The above is only personal observation and does not constitute any investment advice. Please DYOR and manage your position size accordingly.
#LAB#crypto market#Neutron
18
·
--
$LAB Near-term pressure mainly comes from two aspects: Neutron rocket launch has been delayed again to 2027, and in the short term market sentiment is bearish; combined with the roughly 2% decline in U.S. stocks after the close, overall risk appetite weakens and investor confidence is undermined.
From the project progress perspective, the launch schedule is an important milestone in the $LAB narrative. Continuous postponements may lead the market to question the rollout timetable, causing funds to be more inclined to wait rather than chase higher prices.
It’s important to note that a short-term price pullback is not always equivalent to changes in long-term value. The rocket launch is only one part of the $LAB application scenarios; fundamental developments such as the on-chain ecosystem and the tokenomics model are also worth monitoring.
At present, trading volume and market capitalization are relatively limited, and emotional shocks can be amplified easily. Investors who follow the trend should pay attention to volatility risks.
#LAB #Neutron
$LAB Near-term pressure mainly comes from two aspects: Neutron rocket launch has been delayed again to 2027, and in the short term market sentiment is bearish; combined with the roughly 2% decline in U.S. stocks after the close, overall risk appetite weakens and investor confidence is undermined.
From the project progress perspective, the launch schedule is an important milestone in the $LAB narrative. Continuous postponements may lead the market to question the rollout timetable, causing funds to be more inclined to wait rather than chase higher prices.
It’s important to note that a short-term price pullback is not always equivalent to changes in long-term value. The rocket launch is only one part of the $LAB application scenarios; fundamental developments such as the on-chain ecosystem and the tokenomics model are also worth monitoring.
At present, trading volume and market capitalization are relatively limited, and emotional shocks can be amplified easily. Investors who follow the trend should pay attention to volatility risks.
#LAB #Neutron
From the project progress perspective, the launch schedule is an important milestone in the $LAB narrative. Continuous postponements may lead the market to question the rollout timetable, causing funds to be more inclined to wait rather than chase higher prices.
It’s important to note that a short-term price pullback is not always equivalent to changes in long-term value. The rocket launch is only one part of the $LAB application scenarios; fundamental developments such as the on-chain ecosystem and the tokenomics model are also worth monitoring.
At present, trading volume and market capitalization are relatively limited, and emotional shocks can be amplified easily. Investors who follow the trend should pay attention to volatility risks.
#LAB #Neutron
230
the creator is giving a reward for posting a Newton article to participate—it’s very easy#Neutron Suggested talking points (see details at https://tinyurl.com/42k5xwhv)https://tinyurl.com/42k5xwhv) $NEWT Don’t forget you can’t share an article you copied; it has to be original so you can win the reward
the creator is giving a reward for posting a Newton article to participate—it’s very easy
#Neutron Suggested talking points (see details at https://tinyurl.com/42k5xwhv)https://tinyurl.com/42k5xwhv) $NEWT Don’t forget you can’t share an article you copied; it has to be original so you can win the reward
21
Newton Protocol$NEWT Newton Protocol is building an exciting future for Web3 by focusing on a secure, scalable, and efficient blockchain ecosystem. The launch of the Newton Mainnet Beta is an important milestone that allows developers and community members to explore new features, test applications, and help improve the network. I believe this stage will strengthen the ecosystem and encourage more innovation. Community participation is essential because feedback helps make the platform more reliable before wider adoption. I am looking forward to seeing more updates, partnerships, and real-world use cases from $NEWT
#newt #Neutron #crypto
{future}(NEWTUSDT)
Newton Protocol
$NEWT Newton Protocol is building an exciting future for Web3 by focusing on a secure, scalable, and efficient blockchain ecosystem. The launch of the Newton Mainnet Beta is an important milestone that allows developers and community members to explore new features, test applications, and help improve the network. I believe this stage will strengthen the ecosystem and encourage more innovation. Community participation is essential because feedback helps make the platform more reliable before wider adoption. I am looking forward to seeing more updates, partnerships, and real-world use cases from $NEWT
#newt #Neutron #crypto
#newt #Neutron #crypto
75
·
--
$RKLB DUMPS 2% AFTER BLOWOUT REVENUE — THE DELAY STEALS THE SHOW 🚨📉
📊 Here's the paradox: Rocket Lab just printed a record $2.34B quarterly revenue — beating the Street's $2.32B call — and guided Q3 to $2.5-2.65B, above the $2.37B consensus. Yet the stock bled ~2% after hours. Classic sell-the-news? Not quite.
🚨 The real friction? Neutron's maiden flight slips to 2027, with management admitting 'risks and uncertainties' on the timeline. Revenue beats can't outrun a narrative losing ground to SpaceX's Falcon 9 — at least not this session.
💡 When fundamentals print green but price prints red, the market is voting on future catalysts, not the rearview mirror. The Kepler booking for 2028 adds a longer-term anchor, but traders are pricing the wait. 💬 Is the delay fully priced in, or is the de-rating just beginning? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #RKLB #RocketLab #Stocks #Earnings #Neutron
🔥 💎
$RKLB DUMPS 2% AFTER BLOWOUT REVENUE — THE DELAY STEALS THE SHOW 🚨📉
📊 Here's the paradox: Rocket Lab just printed a record $2.34B quarterly revenue — beating the Street's $2.32B call — and guided Q3 to $2.5-2.65B, above the $2.37B consensus. Yet the stock bled ~2% after hours. Classic sell-the-news? Not quite.
🚨 The real friction? Neutron's maiden flight slips to 2027, with management admitting 'risks and uncertainties' on the timeline. Revenue beats can't outrun a narrative losing ground to SpaceX's Falcon 9 — at least not this session.
💡 When fundamentals print green but price prints red, the market is voting on future catalysts, not the rearview mirror. The Kepler booking for 2028 adds a longer-term anchor, but traders are pricing the wait. 💬 Is the delay fully priced in, or is the de-rating just beginning? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #RKLB #RocketLab #Stocks #Earnings #Neutron
🔥 💎
📊 Here's the paradox: Rocket Lab just printed a record $2.34B quarterly revenue — beating the Street's $2.32B call — and guided Q3 to $2.5-2.65B, above the $2.37B consensus. Yet the stock bled ~2% after hours. Classic sell-the-news? Not quite.
🚨 The real friction? Neutron's maiden flight slips to 2027, with management admitting 'risks and uncertainties' on the timeline. Revenue beats can't outrun a narrative losing ground to SpaceX's Falcon 9 — at least not this session.
💡 When fundamentals print green but price prints red, the market is voting on future catalysts, not the rearview mirror. The Kepler booking for 2028 adds a longer-term anchor, but traders are pricing the wait. 💬 Is the delay fully priced in, or is the de-rating just beginning? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️
🏷️ #RKLB #RocketLab #Stocks #Earnings #Neutron
🔥 💎
39
·
--
Bullish
641
287
44
641
@neutron_org + @UncleScroogeCrypto = 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁
#NTRN
Have you ever stopped to think about why most blockchains seem like isolated islands? The market is full of "quick-fix" solutions, but there is a giant awakening in the heart of the Cosmos ecosystem that promises to end this fragmentation.
This giant is @neutron_org
Don’t look at $NTRN merely as another speculative asset; understand the disruptive technology behind it. Neutron is the first platform to utilize Replicated Security from the Cosmos Hub. What does this mean in practice? It inherits the multibillion-dollar and impenetrable security of ATOM to run complex smart contracts. It’s the best of both worlds: the robustness of a sovereign network with the agility of next-generation DeFi applications.
While other projects struggle with insecure bridges, #Neutron allows developers to create dApps that operate natively across multiple chains simultaneously through the IBC protocol. It’s not just a blockchain; it’s the ultimate liquidity hub that the market has been waiting for. We are talking about frictionless cross-chain transactions, where the user doesn’t even notice they’ve switched networks.
The real revolution happens quietly before making noise. Neutron is positioning itself as the backbone of the Interchain economy. The question for the smart investor is not "what is Neutron," but rather: will you wait for mass adoption to understand the importance of this infrastructure? The era of true interoperability has begun, and #Neutron is in command.
{spot}(NTRNUSDT)
@Neutron Network + @Uncle Scrooge Crypto = 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁
#NTRN
Have you ever stopped to think about why most blockchains seem like isolated islands? The market is full of "quick-fix" solutions, but there is a giant awakening in the heart of the Cosmos ecosystem that promises to end this fragmentation.
This giant is @Neutron Network
Don’t look at $NTRN merely as another speculative asset; understand the disruptive technology behind it. Neutron is the first platform to utilize Replicated Security from the Cosmos Hub. What does this mean in practice? It inherits the multibillion-dollar and impenetrable security of ATOM to run complex smart contracts. It’s the best of both worlds: the robustness of a sovereign network with the agility of next-generation DeFi applications.
While other projects struggle with insecure bridges, #Neutron allows developers to create dApps that operate natively across multiple chains simultaneously through the IBC protocol. It’s not just a blockchain; it’s the ultimate liquidity hub that the market has been waiting for. We are talking about frictionless cross-chain transactions, where the user doesn’t even notice they’ve switched networks.
The real revolution happens quietly before making noise. Neutron is positioning itself as the backbone of the Interchain economy. The question for the smart investor is not "what is Neutron," but rather: will you wait for mass adoption to understand the importance of this infrastructure? The era of true interoperability has begun, and #Neutron is in command.
#NTRN
Have you ever stopped to think about why most blockchains seem like isolated islands? The market is full of "quick-fix" solutions, but there is a giant awakening in the heart of the Cosmos ecosystem that promises to end this fragmentation.
This giant is @Neutron Network
Don’t look at $NTRN merely as another speculative asset; understand the disruptive technology behind it. Neutron is the first platform to utilize Replicated Security from the Cosmos Hub. What does this mean in practice? It inherits the multibillion-dollar and impenetrable security of ATOM to run complex smart contracts. It’s the best of both worlds: the robustness of a sovereign network with the agility of next-generation DeFi applications.
While other projects struggle with insecure bridges, #Neutron allows developers to create dApps that operate natively across multiple chains simultaneously through the IBC protocol. It’s not just a blockchain; it’s the ultimate liquidity hub that the market has been waiting for. We are talking about frictionless cross-chain transactions, where the user doesn’t even notice they’ve switched networks.
The real revolution happens quietly before making noise. Neutron is positioning itself as the backbone of the Interchain economy. The question for the smart investor is not "what is Neutron," but rather: will you wait for mass adoption to understand the importance of this infrastructure? The era of true interoperability has begun, and #Neutron is in command.
1.6k
787
157
1.6k
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
1
#EarningsSeason
1.8M views
9,272 Discussing
2
#ZcashDevelopersConfirmNovemberDateForNU7Upgrade
10,255 views
367 Discussing
3
#OCCIssuesFirstFinalRuleUnderGENIUSAct
9,802 views
378 Discussing
4
#TrumpExpectedToOutlineCrackdownOnOverseasCryptoScams
4,588 views
47 Discussing
5
#KoreanRetailLost6.3TrillionWonOnLeveragedETPs
18,029 views
417 Discussing
6
#GENIUSActExpectedToTakeEffectJan18,2027
0 views
0 Discussing
7
#SolanaSetToActivateAlpenglowToday
6,874 views
243 Discussing
8
#PolkadotFoundationWarnsFearlessWalletExtensionLeakedPrivateKeys
58 views
7 Discussing
9
#SpaceXAndTeslaFormCommitteesToExploreMerger
3,101 views
80 Discussing
10
#110AutomatedWalletsGenerate99.6%OfRLUSDPayments
14,940 views
246 Discussing