11

Zcash ($ZEC ) Surges 16.19%: Why Traders Are Taking Notice

Zcash ($ZEC ) is on fire, up 16.19% in 24 hours. The surge is driven by renewed interest in privacy-focused cryptocurrencies. $ZEC ’s robust 24-hour volume of $2.31B indicates strong liquidity and market participation. The coin’s unique privacy features and recent protocol upgrades are attracting both retail and institutional investors. With a solid market cap rank of #11, $ZEC is proving its resilience and relevance in the crypto space. 👀

Follow for daily crypto updates.

#HahaProfit #Zcash

I’ve been watching Lil' Shrub (SHRUB) surge +12%, while Pons (PONS) slipped –5% after a rally. Zcash (ZEC) steadied +2% at #11 rank. 🚀

I’m keeping an eye on Pudgy Penguins (PENGU), up +8% into the top 100, and Lighter (LIT) up +4% at #69. 💡

Ethena (ENA) rose +6% and Cash Cat (CASHCAT) fell –3%, showing mid‑cap activity. I’ve set alerts for the next move. 🎯

$CHIP , $NIGHT , $MARSCOIN

60-SECOND ALPHA #11 | $SEI

SEI is built around high-speed trading and performance, making it a useful example of how blockchain infrastructure can target a very specific market.

👉🏻 When researching an altcoin, don't just ask “Can the price pump?” Ask what problem the network is actually trying to solve.

The 15-minute line of $MAGMA shot straight up, +18.6%. Volume surged to more than 3 times the usual level, and by the close it had even broken through the upper range of the last 20 five-minute candles.

But interestingly, OI did not rise along with it; contracts actually shrank by 1.49%. This kind of price-up, position-down structure looks more like shorts covering than new longs driving the move. In other words, the sustainability of this rally is questionable, so keep an eye on it.

Looking at the order book, aggressive trades were lower by 6.8%, with buy-side slightly dominant, but not overwhelmingly so. MAGMA has now reached the vicinity of its own historical extreme range; it ranks #11 in overall anomaly level and #8 in notional change, which is indeed eye-catching. However, chasing at this level is easy to get punished.

Best to observe for now and wait for a pullback confirmation before saying more. Don’t mistake short covering for a trend reversal.

One very obvious feeling lately is that the market is starting to get more ambitious again about “AI infrastructure.”

It’s not the kind of hype that gets sparked by a slogan. It’s more like the money has gradually come back to the line that asks: “Who can actually meet real compute demand?”

On my commute home by subway, I was scrolling through the US stock perpetual list and saw that $NBIS is ranked quite high—so I took a closer look.

It’s not the most eye-catching stock today, but it’s #11 on the gainers list and #26 by trading volume. That kind of positioning suggests it’s already made it onto a lot of people’s watch lists.

I’m leaning bullish on it—not because of how much it’s risen in a single day.

More like: once a name like this gets categorized by the market under the “AI infrastructure / compute-related” narrative, its valuation upside can be larger than that of many traditional software stocks.

From what I understand, Nebius Group is also roughly in this direction.

What these companies depend on most isn’t just concept-level heat. It’s whether the market continues to believe that future needs for AI training, inference, and cloud-side resources won’t cool down anytime soon.

As long as this main theme remains, related stocks are very likely to be repeatedly picked up by capital.

And the price action isn’t totally flimsy, either.

At the current price of $202.99, it’s up +4.29% over the past 24 hours. It also traded as high as $206.21 in the middle, then got pushed back a bit—this suggests there’s still some disagreement above, and it’s not like there’s zero friction.

But I actually think this kind of back-and-forth is healthier than a straight-line surge.

If it were pure emotion-driven momentum, funding rates would often already be running wild.

Right now the funding rate is still +0.0000%, which is kind of interesting. It implies sentiment hasn’t gotten out of control—at least it’s not in that state where everyone’s bullish and crowded trades are making people feel trapped.

My friend who trades used to remind me that stocks that can continue running are often better to trade not at the loudest moment, but in the “people start taking it seriously, but it hasn’t exploded into a full squeeze yet” phase.

$NBIS feels a bit like it’s in that kind of range right now.

Of course, I’m not blindly optimistic.

The biggest problem with this kind of stock is that when expectations move ahead of reality, volatility can get especially high.

Its 24-hour low-to-high range isn’t small—between $193.26 and $206.21—which shows that capital attention is real, and sentiment swings are real too.

If later the whole AI infrastructure theme cools off, it probably won’t be able to hard carry on its own.

But looking at the present only, I’m inclined to keep it on the bullish watch list.

Not because it has already proven everything—because the sector is still being repriced repeatedly, and the chart hasn’t gotten hot enough to make me uneasy.

This post is just my own thoughts, not investment advice. $NBIS #US stocks

Over the past two months, I’ve had a very direct feeling: the market’s patience for “selling stories” is getting worse. Meanwhile, companies that can truly “lock in an industry position” are getting more generous attention.

Especially stocks tied to AI infrastructure, compute power distribution, cloud—capital is now picking more carefully than it was a couple of years ago.

Putting it on $NBIS , I’m slightly bullish.

Not because it jumped +4.26% in 24 hours and I had to find a reason.

It’s because today it ranks #11 on Binance’s US stocks perpetuals gainers list, and it’s also #26 on the trading volume list. That suggests it’s not the kind of name that gets a quick burst of heat and then nobody takes over—there’s sustained attention in the book.

I just looked back and forth at its intraday volatility: from $193.26 up to $206.21, and it’s still hovering around $202.82 at the end.

This kind of movement is something I usually pay attention to for a bit longer.

If it can surge without turning into a complete mess, it means the buying pressure isn’t just pure emotion-driven bids pushing it up.

There’s another detail I care about: the funding rate is +0.0000%.

There’s almost no bias—meaning it hasn’t yet gotten squeezed into a one-sided crowd.

A lot of stocks’ most uncomfortable moment is when everyone piles in and prices expectations up all at once. Then even if the company’s direction is correct, the stock price often still takes a pullback first.

As of now, $NBIS ’s contract sentiment—at least based on that—hasn’t heated up to the point where I feel like I need to run and hide.

And looking at open positions, 106,467 lots isn’t exactly cold.

For a ticker that can get listed on both Binance TradFi and also support USDT-margined perpetuals, the level of participation itself is worth discussing.

Another reason I’m bullish: for names like this, if they really can hold a role as an “infrastructure provider” or an “AI-related capability enabler,” the market’s imagination space usually isn’t something that gets fully played out in just one or two days.

I’m intentionally keeping my tone conservative.

I don’t have particularly detailed business资料 in my hands, and I also don’t want to pretend to understand and fabricate a company track record.

But in sector trading, it often works like this: it’s not always the strongest company at the end that gets watched first. Instead, it’s the group that funding has already validated as “worth repeatedly looking at.”

Of course, this one is not a blind sprint either.

Its intraday amplitude isn’t small. In that push from the low to the high, people who chase too fast can easily get shaken out.

If later it’s only the contracts that stay lively and the spot side can’t keep up, or if sentiment cools down, the drawdown will come quickly too.

If it were me, I’d put it into a continuous tracking list—I wouldn’t dismiss it just because it’s up for one day.

When these stocks really run, it’s often not at the exact moment when you’re most comfortable that they give you a chance to board. $NBIS #USStocks

If you lose, don’t cue me. If you make money, buy me a cup of coffee.

$CYS this 15-minute level rally has something going on.

At the same time that price broke above the upper boundary of the 20 five-minute K-line range, volume was more than 2 times normal, and OI also kept pace. The most important thing is that aggressive buying had the upper hand — the buy/sell ratio was 1.27, and aggressive trade imbalance was 12% — this is not a structure that retail chasing orders can produce; it looks more like a big player adding leverage to chase the breakout.

To be honest, the notional change ranked #11 across the whole pool, and the OI abnormal percentile directly hit 99.2%. Such continuous funding anomalies across consecutive cycles are really rare in the current market.

That said, it is already pressing against its own historical extreme range, so the risk-reward of chasing higher needs to be weighed carefully. The data looks pretty, but the market does not only go up and never down. At this level, it is better to miss than to make a mistake.

Let’s see whether the next few K-lines can hold up. The key is the pullback confirmation after a volume breakout.

$USELESS This move is a bit interesting 🤔

In 15m, it’s pulled up nearly 2%; OI is also up +2.46%. Nominal change has reached all the way to the whole pool #11—this clearly looks like new leveraged long positions are entering, not just a “fake pump” from short covering. The anomalous percentile is 92.9%. It’s not a one-off spike; it’s been confirming for several consecutive cycles. This kind of sustained OI abnormal pattern is hard to ignore in the short term.

In the last 24h, trading value is already up to 400 million. This suggests the stock is fairly active in terms of capital. Still, note that while buy orders have come in, aggressive execution is down—active trades are -1.6% and the buy/sell ratio is 0.97. The chasing longs aren’t particularly aggressive. The rhythm may be more about consolidation and digestion rather than a straight one-way surge.

Structurally, I like setups like this: price is moving, positions are building, and volume supports it. But the higher it goes, the more you need to watch how fragile leverage can be. With this high OI + rising combination, if the market tone turns, the rebound on a pullback can be just as scary. Whether $USELESS can continue depends mainly on whether OI keeps pushing alongside the price—not OI collapsing against the price.

The price increase is in the lead, but the funding rate is only up to +0.0228%—this isn’t the most common “maxed-out” sentiment top.

$NiuLai Today, I can get into the futures contract gainers list #5 and the trading volume list #11. I interpret it as contract capital pushing the heat up, but it hasn’t reached runaway levels yet. In the past 24 hours, futures contract trading volume has hit $405.18M—this isn’t exactly quiet for a small-cap coin. The issue is that the price is up 28.68%, yet the funding rate hasn’t skyrocketed in a similarly dramatic way, which suggests there is chasing longs, but not that kind of one-sided stampede into it.

More importantly, it’s the open interest (OI). Right now, OI is 130,336,159 $NiuLai. The price and OI are both rising together, and the meaning on the order book is very straightforward: it’s not just shorts covering—there really is new money entering positions. This kind of structure can push the coin onto the rankings and can also keep amplifying volatility. If it were only the price pushing up while OI dropped, I’d treat it as the tail end of a squeeze. But it’s not that.

I didn’t chase longs. I placed a small short position on the pullback. I won’t pick up near the current price. I’ll wait for the moment when it surges on increased volume but OI stops increasing further—then I’ll act. My position size is 3%, and I’ll tighten the stop-loss. The reason is simple: contract volume is expanding, the funding rate has turned positive, and open interest is rising. In that structure, whoever comes in from the back to chase the move gets an unfavorable risk-reward. If it really keeps running up, I’d rather miss it than jump in when everyone else’s emotions are at their fullest.

Why is this coin on the list today? It’s not complicated: it’s not that spot first tells the story—futures first create the volatility. As long as spot volume can’t keep up, what matters next is who loosens their grip first, not who shouts louder. $NiuLai #NiuLai

I could also be wrong—based on my own judgment.

$CRCL I’m relatively bullish. It’s not selling a typical “normal stock” story—it’s eating into the theme that “stablecoins are becoming more and more like financial infrastructure.”

I’ve been trading perps for a long time, and the most visceral thing I’ve felt is this: many people on the surface shout about decentralization, but in their actual actions they’re transferring money, moving funds, parking capital—yet in the end they can’t get around stablecoins.

From what I understand, Circle’s most solid layer of cognition is deeply bound to $USDC .

As long as on-chain settlement, exchange capital turnover, and USD mapping/pegging continue to expand, the market will keep giving companies like this attention.

What’s hard about this kind of target isn’t telling the story—the hard part is that you have to first stand in the position of that “water, electricity, and heating” utility provider.

The second reason I see it has merit is that it’s easier for traditional capital to understand than many pure “concept” plays.

A lot of US stock investors may not research whether a specific chain is fast, but the words “stablecoin issuer” are already enough to place it into the boxes of payments, digital dollars, and crypto infrastructure.

Whether money keeps flowing in sometimes just depends on that one step of translation.

The order book/market action is also interesting.

$CRCL is now at $88.1, with the 24h high and low at $88.4 and $86.02. The gain is only +0.80%—it doesn’t look explosive, but trading volume is already $39.38M USDT, which shows this is not a coin/token nobody touches.

Even more importantly, on Binance US stocks perp’s gainers list it ranks #11, and on the trading volume list it’s at #10.

This kind of play doesn’t rocket up in a big chaotic green candle; instead it looks more like someone is willing to keep receiving bids repeatedly.

The funding rate is still +0.0000%. I interpret it like this: sentiment hasn’t gotten so hot that it’s ridiculous—there aren’t too many people on the train trying to make quick money.

Open interest is 868,307 contracts. Attention is real, but it hasn’t reached that crowded feeling where you look at it and immediately want to dodge.

And I’m not blindly singing “buy more.”

For the stablecoin theme, the most feared variables are always regulation interpretation and overall market risk appetite.

As long as the external winds shift, even if the company itself hasn’t had any new issues, the valuation will be pressed down first.

But if you ask me whether at this position it will continue to be added to my watchlist—I would. And I’m the type that’s more willing to buy the dip, then look again.

If you can’t handle the pressure, don’t get on the train. Anyway, I also have the experience of being burned.

$CRCL #USStocks

If you lose money don’t cue me. If you profit, please treat me to a coffee.

$TAO This pullback is a bit too smooth—within 15 minutes it’s down -2% straight away. Trading volume has jumped to 10x+; and at the close it even broke below the lower band of the recent 20 five-minute K lines.

Don’t just look at the price—there’s more to it in the order-book details. OI is falling. In the 1-hour contracts, notional has been cut by more than 2.7 million U. The long/short ratio is 0.65, and the passive sell pressure is being held down tightly. This doesn’t look like one of those “volume spike and instantly crush” selloffs. It’s more like someone at the high ground is quietly unwinding leverage and reducing positions.

The funding rate is still high, which suggests longs are still clinging to hope, but OI has already been declining. This kind of divergence structure has shown up many times before; usually it’s not a reversal signal—it’s often the prelude to a stampede.

In TAO history, this kind of extreme range isn’t that common. Today it ranks #33 across the abnormal pool, and notional change is #11—definitely worth keeping an eye on. 24h trading volume is 176 million, and momentum/volume is still there; liquidity hasn’t fled.

As for action: don’t rush to catch the falling knife. Wait for OI to stabilize and for active buy orders to return. Bottom-picking here isn’t as good as letting it form its own structure first.

My assessment of $TSLA is pretty straightforward: it’s not just a “car” theme. In many cases, the market uses it as a barometer for growth sentiment.

Honestly, once this kind of stock comes back into the most actively traded circle, the attention itself becomes a catalyst.

Today, on Binance’s US stocks perpetuals, it ranks #11 by percentage gain and #17 by trading value. I’ll take that as a fairly solid signal.

It’s not the kind of sluggish rise with nobody watching—it’s more like the capital is willing to keep coming back and forth.

When I saw it on my phone on the subway on the way home, I almost missed my stop. My first reaction wasn’t, “Up 2.79%—that’s strong.” Instead, it was that throughout the day it climbed from $345.56 all the way to $357.42, with the price basically holding near the highs into the close. That kind of chart behavior really says something about sentiment.

I’m bullish, and here’s another reason: there are so many expectations baked into it.

From my understanding, the market doesn’t look at it as just a single sales number or a single line of business. It’s also asking whether it can keep staying at the forefront of the narratives around new energy, smart technologies, and manufacturing efficiency.

That’s both the most troublesome and the most fascinating part of companies like this—you can’t easily box them in with a single static label.

As long as the broader market is willing to give growth stocks valuation room, it often becomes a name that’s traded repeatedly.

Looking at the finer details on the board, I also don’t think it’s overheated to the point that makes me uncomfortable.

The funding rate is only +0.0068%, which suggests bullish sentiment is there, but it hasn’t reached the level where, at a glance, you’d want to hide.

There is some momentum, but it’s not outrageous. That kind of state often allows the trend to continue for a bit longer.

Of course, the downside is also pretty clear: when expectations are packed to the brim, any slight failure to meet them can easily amplify price volatility.

And with highly watched names like this, if things go smoothly they move very smoothly—but if they go the wrong way, it can be really exhausting.

Last night, my trader friend—my girlfriend who trades—also told me that what scares investors in this category of stocks most isn’t simply being wrong about the direction. It’s that even when you’re right about the big trend, you can still get shaken out in the middle.

So my stance is generally bullish, but I don’t want to chase the emotion when things get overly excited.

If I’m going to look, I’d rather treat it as a strong-asset to observe. As long as the market is still willing to price in the growth-story premium, $TSLA probably won’t easily fall behind.

These are just my own thoughts, not advice. $TSLA #US stocks

This isn’t a trend kickoff. I’m handling the high-turnover sentiment with $NOM .

The spot price is $0.0018, up 15.789% in 24h. The range runs from $0.00151 to $0.00187, and the intraday swing is already large enough. What catches my attention isn’t the pump—it’s the structure: spot 24h trading volume is only $2.45M, while the futures volume is $7.58M, with the futures-to-spot volume ratio at 3.1x. The price can enter the spot gainers list at #3 and the futures gainers list at #11 without spot slowly accumulating position—it’s the futures that first concentrates the heat.

The funding rate is only +0.0031%, so it’s not crowded, and the longs haven’t reached the point of going out of control yet. But open interest sits at 1,849,630,885 NOM, which suggests someone is continually taking these sentiment-driven swings at this level—market-side competition is getting heavier. This setup, I usually treat as: “there’s trading, but no consensus.” People are willing to place orders, but that doesn’t mean they’re willing to hold.

My move is very direct: I won’t chase the current price. I’ll wait for it to come back near $0.00168 and then try a fast-in, fast-out with a 3% position size. If it breaks below today’s densely traded mid-range zone, I’ll exit. If price goes back to test the $0.00187 high again, open interest keeps increasing, and the funding rate stays pinned near the low end—I won’t add either, because that looks more like high-level churn turnover than a brand-new trend trade.

When a coin like this makes the leaderboard, it’s often not because the narrative suddenly got stronger. It’s because a small-cap asset gets amplified volatility through futures trading volume. Trading can be done; holding isn’t my interest. $NOM #NOM

This is just my take—your money, your call.

TRUMP This rebound is a bit interesting—within 15 minutes it surged by nearly 2%. Volume also reached 1.42x, and the price has broken above the upper bound of the recent 20 five-minute candlesticks’ range.

But don’t rush to chase. I looked at the futures data, and the interesting part is this: OI is actually declining. The 15-minute contract positioning dropped by 0.12%, and at the 1-hour level it even decreased by 1.56%. This combination of price rising + open interest falling more closely resembles short covering rather than a rally driven by new longs entering the market. Add to that the active trade spread of 14.4% and the buy-sell ratio of 1.34—on the order book, buyers are indeed aggressive. However, the funding rate is already at a recent high percentile, so the cost-effectiveness of chasing longs isn’t great, to be honest.

The key point is: for a pull-up driven by position cover, the sustainability is often questionable. Right now, the pool’s abnormality ranks #11 and the notional change ranks #6. There is definitely some heat, but whether the “smart money” is truly kicking off a move—or is simply using short sellers’ liquidation to unload—can’t be concluded from just these few candlesticks.

My take: short-term sentiment is hot, but don’t be fooled by this single bullish candle. Watch whether OI can keep up afterward; if it can’t, this move is very likely a fake breakout. $TRUMP —at this kind of level, the thing that these kinds of stocks fear most is getting stuck holding a bag after buying at the high.

$ENA This 15-minute K-line is a bit interesting.

The price is down 0.89%, volume is up to 1.79x, and the volatility Z is 2.01. Then I notice the OI is rising—contract open interest for 15 minutes is up 0.47%—but the notional value is shrinking. This scene isn’t new long positions getting trapped; it looks more like someone is using leverage to smash the price down.

The aggressive trade count differential is -31%, the buy/sell ratio is 0.53, and at the close it breaks below the lows of the previous nearly 20 five-minute K-lines directly. This isn’t panic selling—it’s a targeted breakout, and that kind of downward pressure where incremental short participants are following through.

The notional change for the whole pool ranks at #11, and the scale isn’t small.

You think the bottom-catchers are grabbing a falling knife—actually, they’re delivering fuel.

$UAI This move is kind of interesting.

In 15 minutes, it climbed 2.61%, and the volume directly came in at 2.77x—this isn’t the kind of fake pump. More importantly, the OI is pushing upward in sync: in the 15-minute contracts, positions increased by 0.68%, and on the 1-hour dimension it rose by 3.34%. What does that indicate? Real money is entering—not just shorts covering on a so-called breakout.

At the close, it directly broke through the upper highs of nearly 20 five-minute candlesticks, with active trading value up 14.7%, and clearly buyers are in control. Across the entire pool, its abnormal ranking is up to #11, the OI percentile is 94.4%—we’re already in a state very close to historical extreme ranges.

Honestly, a structure where price is rising and open interest is rising is more reliable than a mere price anomaly. The newly added leveraged long positions are placing real bets on the direction.

That said, the closer you get to an extreme level, the more you need to be careful. Chasing at this point also carries increasing risk—don’t just stare at the percentage gain and forget where you are.