Joshua Brown 007

#squarecreator
4.9K+ Views ≠ 4.9K+ Reasons to Blindly Follow a Trader.😂

This is something every trader should pay attention to.
The person in this screenshot is a content creator + trader, sharing trade calls with thousands of views and followers.
But look closely at the $USELESS setup.
The post says:
“Rejection near ATH could trigger a pullback.”
Short entry: 0.1440–0.1470
Now look at the chart.
The marked All-Time High is 0.44340.
So the question is simple:
Are we really “near ATH” at 0.14–0.15?
This is exactly why I always say:
Don’t trade someone’s followers.
Don’t trade someone’s views.
Trade your own analysis.
A creator can be right 10 times and wrong on the 11th.
And when your money is involved, you pay for that mistake not the influencer.
Friends, please take care of your portfolio. ❤️
Do your own research, verify the chart, understand the market structure, and THEN take the trade.
Blindly following anyone’s trade call can be very expensive.
Views create influence.
Analysis creates conviction.
But risk management protects your capital.
DYOR.

$TRIA
$BULLA

#analysis $USELESS
Maybe the Pump Is Not the Real Story.
Look at the chart…
+58% in 24H
+251% in 7D
And volume is exploding alongside price.
But the real question isn't:
“Why is $USELESS pumping?”
The better question is:
“Where is the liquidity and attention behind this move coming from?”

The contract is as under:
0xba38b3c706f7a515ff7c8db04daa0a134ec46d2b

This is the BNB Smart Chain BEP-20 representation, not the Solana mint address. The contract uses 6 decimals, so traders should verify the chain before interacting with it.
And this is where it gets interesting.
$USELESS has seen a massive expansion in trading activity, while the price has moved hundreds of percent in just days.
To me, this looks less like a simple pump and more like:
Narrative → Volume → Breakout → FOMO → Leverage
That is usually the stage where experienced traders start watching liquidity, holder concentration, volume quality and open interest not just the green candles.
Because chasing a pump is easy.
Understanding what is actually powering the pump is the real edge.
Always verify the network + contract address before trading.
DYOR.

#MAGMAUSTD $MAGMA
i am waiting for reversal from 22, 21 if break 20 ????😭😭😭 https://www.binance.info/en/futures/ref/860089089

#pepe $1000PEPE
Entry: 0.00346–0.00348
SL: 0.00331
TP1: 0.00360
TP2: 0.00385
TP3: 0.00400

#ARB🔥🔥🔥 $ARB
Entry: $0.26000 (limit order — wait for retest)
Leverage: 20x
Size: $99 USDC/USDT
Stop-Loss: $0.25200
Take Profit 1: $0.29000 (close 40%)
Take Profit 2: $0.31000 (close 30%)
Take Profit 3: $0.34000 (close 20%)
Take Profit 4: $0.37000 (close 10%)

BRUSDT is an early stage crypto with extremely low liquidity. A single large sell order can cause a 10–20% flash crash. Do NOT use 50x leverage you will get liquidated instantly. Use 10–20x max and set tight stops.

If you insist on 50x, place your order, set SL, and watch it like a hawk this coin can move 20% in 5 minutes.
#US10YearTreasuryYieldHitsHighestSinceNov2023 #PredictionMarketsPutCLARITYAct2026OddsAt15% #IranStrikesUSBaseInKuwait

#TradeNTell
Pump and dump tokens can give you a good profit if you are an expert-level trader. However, if you are not an expert trader you should stay away from such tokens. They can liquidate you at any time.

Engaging with pump-and-dump tokens carries a near 100% risk of total capital loss for inexperienced traders. These ecosystems are mathematically designed to benefit insiders at the expense of retail participants.

Exchanges and decentralized pools can experience severe slippage during a "dump." This means even if you set a stop-loss, the price might drop so fast that your order cannot execute, leading to instant liquidation.

$AKE
$MUBARAK
$TRUMP

#TradeSignal $MUBARAK
Still in bearish structure my TP 0.0260 50% close then wait 0.0240 full close.

#update
💰BTC is following Gold.

Gold broke out of a major sideways range, rallied ~20%, then BTC followed (2x) rallied ~40%.

Gold is now down almost 10% from the top. BTC could be heading for 10-20% next .
$BTC
$XAU

$USELESS crashed just little bit late But not enough Late😁👍

https://www.binance.com/en/futures/ref/860089089

#Community October IS COMING.

Something is not adding up in my Binance Rewards Hub.
Look at these screenshots carefully:
One place shows my reward as “Distributed” ✅
Another shows “Not distributed” ❌
And the voucher I was expecting from the Ongoing / Past Rewards Hub is still not received.
Now this becomes more concerning because yesterday I faced another execution issue.
I closed two trades at the same time using Close All Positions, but the execution prices were different.
The price action/slippage moved against my expected exit — the profit I should have received was effectively reduced, and the position was closed at a much worse level.
I’m not saying every discrepancy automatically means a server failure.
But when you see reward-status inconsistencies + missing vouchers + unexpected execution-price differences, you have to ask questions.

If Binance experiences another major server/execution issue around the same period as previous yearly cycles, traders need to be prepared not surprised.$USELESS
$MAGMA

#TradeSignal $ARB Guys its time to close your long and Short now then open long again👍
Entry0.1150 – 0.1170

Stop-Loss 0.1205

Take Profit0.1080 and 0.1050

Bearish Invalidation (for Short): Price breaks above 0.1201 with volume – structure remains bullish. Flip to long targeting 0.1250+.

follow me for more update and Trade analysis.

#ARB🔥🔥🔥 $ARB
$USELESS $ONG

#Community
Binance Futures Is this normal?
I noticed something strange while prep Trading and Today an idea came to my mind:

why don't I open two positions with different sizes today, and then close them using 'Close All' to see what happens? i do that “Close All Positions” on $SKR .
Both positions were closed at exactly the same timestamp: 21:16:35.
But look at the execution prices:
🔴 Short: 0.027822
🟢 Long: 0.027812
That’s a 0.000010 price difference, even though both positions were closed together through the same Close All action.

Short PNL: -$0.43
Long PNL: +$0.43
Both closed at the same second
Different average close prices
Different position sizes
I understand that market orders can experience slippage and different fills because each order is matched independently.
But when the exchange closes both sides simultaneously, why are the execution prices different?
Is this simply normal order-book execution, or could there be a server/execution-engine issue during “Close All Positions”?
Would like to hear from experienced Binance Futures traders.
Has anyone else noticed this?
$SKR
$FLOCK

$SKR
Quick breakdown of what’s happening with this token right now:

First things first, the price is sitting at $0.01565, and honestly, it has been absolutely ripping over the last day. We are looking at a massive 58% pump in the last 24 hours. It’s still up about 8% over the last hour, though it’s cooling off just a tiny bit on the 5-minute chart right now—which is totally normal after a run like this.

The Volume and Hype
The trading action is pretty wild. We've seen over 10,000 transactions today alone. The buy volume is beating out the sell volume ($310K vs $244K), and there are more unique buyers than sellers (442 to 414). Overall, bulls are definitely driving the car right now.

The Red Flags (Pay Attention Here)
Don't let the green percentages blind you. There are two major things you need to watch out for:

Low Liquidity: The market cap is at $88.4M and the fully diluted value is $155.2M, but there is only $583K in total liquidity. Even though that liquidity is locked, it’s still a very small pool for a project this size. This means the price is going to be incredibly volatile, and a few big whales dropping their bags could tank the chart instantly.

Mint Function:
The scanner is throwing a warning that "This token is mintable." That’s a pretty big risk factor because it means whoever owns the contract can technically press a button, create new tokens out of thin air, and dilute everyone.

Enjoy the pump if you're in, but definitely manage your risk and don't get FOMO.
#KoreaSingleStockLeveragedETFTradingFalls #VietnamPilotsCryptoAssetMarket #GoldFalls3.24%ThisWeek #VenezuelaUSSign25YearOilDeal

$MAGMA traders, don’t look only at the pump… look at how long the money was trapped.
If we look at the 1D chart, MAGMA spent roughly 3 weeks in a sideways/accumulation range, mostly between ~$0.18–$0.31, before this aggressive breakout.
Now price is around $0.53, RSI(6) is already near 85, and volume has expanded massively.
But there is another silent factor many traders ignore: Funding Fees.
If funding remains positive, Longs are paying Shorts at every funding settlement.
The longer you hold a leveraged Long, the more that funding can quietly eat into your PnL.
So even if MAGMA keeps moving sideways after the pump, a leveraged Long can keep bleeding money through funding.
Profit on the chart ≠ profit in the account.
Before holding a leveraged position, always check:
• Current funding rate
• Funding history
• Leverage
• Position size
• How long you plan to hold
A trade can be right on direction… and still lose money because of time + leverage + funding.
Don’t let funding become the silent killer of your profit.

#TradeNTell $MAGMA
Maybe I opened the wrong position here. 🤦‍♂️
I went Long on $MAGMA at 0.50067 with 20x leverage.
Current Mark Price: 0.48870
Position Size: 31.30 USDT
Current PNL: -0.76 USDT (-48.12%)
And here’s what makes this interesting…
The market is showing strong bullish pressure, while I’m sitting on the opposite side of the traffic. 🚛
Maybe the setup was wrong.
Maybe my timing was wrong.
Or maybe the market is simply waiting to prove me wrong.
I’ve placed my SL and now I’m watching one thing:
How long will this position survive? 👀
If SL gets hit → I accept the mistake.
If price reverses → the market will confirm the idea.
Because trading isn’t about being right every time.
It’s about knowing when you’re driving against the traffic. 🚦
Do you think this $MAGMA Long was a wrong entry? 👇

#BTC
$47M BTC SHORT BEFORE WARSH’S SPEECH?
A whale reportedly opened a $47M $BTC short just before Kevin Warsh’s Jackson Hole speech.
The timing is definitely interesting.
And there was a real macro reason to be cautious: Warsh came out more hawkish than many bulls wanted, saying inflation remains too high and that the Fed may need to do more if underlying inflation doesn’t move toward 2% fast enough.
Reuters +1
Bitcoin was already sitting near $80K, after a strong weekly rally and $2.8B of ETF inflows over eight consecutive sessions.
CoinDesk
So was this whale predicting the speech?
Maybe. Maybe not.
A $47M position is significant—but timing alone is not proof of insider information.
Still…
Whoever opened that short certainly wasn't afraid of the volatility.

#BTC☀️
Bitcoin’s odds just flipped dramatically.

Only 13% chance of $50K before $100K, while $100K first is now priced at 87%.

Why?

BTC reclaimed $80K, momentum accelerated, the dollar weakened and macro liquidity improved.

The market is no longer pricing the same downside risk.

$100K is becoming the closer magnet.

what you think $BTC hit first?

#TradeNTell $MAGMA
Short Entry 0.39300 – 0.39999

SL 0.42390

TP1: 0.37560

TP2: 0.36700

TP3: 0.34800

Risk/Reward: ~1:4

Invalidation Point: Break and close above 0.40250.

Avoid trading during the first 15 minutes of the 1H candle close if price is at the BOLL Upper Band.

Band Expansion: Price is riding the Upper Band (0.39090), indicating high volatility.

Breakout Reality: The breakout is real but likely exhausted. The price is at the band's edge, which often leads to a pullback.

#KospiFallsAsAITradingEuphoriaCools #TaiwanTAIEXRetakes46500OnChipRally #CentralBanksBuy289TonsGoldInQ2 #SP500Rises0.7%TechSectorGains3.3%

#sui $SUI Short Setup o 1H Chart
sui Short
Entry Zone: 0.7665 – 0.7731 Limit Entry
Stop Loss: 0.7815

TP1: 0.7500

TP2: 0.7450

TP3: 0.7241

Risk Management
3x – 5x (Max). This is not a low-cap degen play; use low leverage.

DO NOT LONG at current price (0.7636) or at 0.7450 without confirmation.