security

私たちがこのデジタルエコシステムの中で進化するにつれて、捕食者も進化します。エンジェルとして、私はセキュリティの風景の変化を強調したいと思います：技術的なハッキングからAIを活用した社会工学への移行。
親しみの錯覚 🎭
私たちは、音声と映像が恐ろしい精度で偽造される時代に突入しています。「ディープフェイク」はもはや映画だけのものではなく、交換スタッフやインフルエンサー、さらにはあなた自身の同僚を偽装するために使用され、最も重要なセキュリティ層を回避します：あなたの直感。

ほとんどの人は、取引を失う前にアカウントを失います。
フィッシングは、特にアクティブに取引を行い、自動的にメールをチェックしている場合、最も簡単に消えてしまう方法です。
それがBinanceのフィッシング対策コードが登場するところです。
これは特に複雑なものではありません。実際のメールと偽のメールを瞬時にフィルタリングするシンプルなセキュリティ層です。

フィッシング対策コードとは実際に何か
それは、Binance内で自分で設定するカスタムコードです。
有効化されると、Binanceからのすべての正当なメールには、メッセージのどこかにその正確なコードが含まれます。

In crypto, where you settle value matters as much as how fast you move it. Stablecoins like $USDT have become the default medium for internet payments, remittances, trading, payroll, and cross-border commerce. But the chains they run on weren’t designed with stablecoins as the primary citizen. That’s where @Plasma changes the design philosophy.
Plasma’s thesis is simple but powerful: if stablecoins are the dominant economic activity on-chain, then the chain’s security and neutrality must be optimized around them. And Plasma achieves this by anchoring its security model to Bitcoin — the most battle-tested, neutral, and censorship-resistant settlement layer in existence.
Why neutrality matters for stablecoins ⚖️
Stablecoins are not speculative assets; they are transactional money. Businesses, freelancers, merchants, and families rely on them for real payments. This requires a settlement environment that is politically neutral, economically stable, and resistant to manipulation.
Most smart contract chains rely on their native token economics for security. That introduces volatility, fee instability, and governance trade-offs that don’t align with the needs of payment rails. Plasma decouples this by using Bitcoin’s security guarantees as an anchor, so stablecoin movement inherits neutrality by design.
Bitcoin anchoring = trust without permission 🧱
By referencing Bitcoin for security assurances, Plasma ensures that transaction validity and ordering are not dependent on a volatile token economy. This creates a base layer of trust that is independent of DeFi cycles, memecoin seasons, or network congestion caused by unrelated activity.
For users sending USDT across borders, this means:
Settlement on rails backed by Bitcoin’s immutability
Reduced risk of network manipulation
A payments environment that behaves like infrastructure, not speculation
That’s a major psychological and practical shift for stablecoin users.
A chain that treats stablecoins as first-class citizens 💵
On $XPL , stablecoins aren’t an afterthought. The network is designed around their flow. This includes fee logic, performance tuning, and security assumptions that prioritize transactional reliability over token-driven incentives.
It’s the difference between running stablecoins on a smart contract chain and building a chain for stablecoins.
The bigger picture 🌍
As stablecoins become the internet’s default money, the need for neutral settlement grows. Plasma positions itself as that neutral ground — where value can move without inheriting the biases of any single ecosystem.
This is why the Bitcoin anchor isn’t a marketing point. It’s a design decision that aligns perfectly with the needs of global payments.
@Plasma #Plasma #Stablecoins #Payments #security #GoldSilverRebound

The foundational promise of blockchain is decentralization, but for institutions, the word often triggers alarms about governance and control. @Dusk faces a unique architectural challenge: building a network decentralized enough to be secure and censorship-resistant, yet structured enough to meet the strict Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) requirements of its target market. Dusk's solution is a sophisticated, multi-phase approach to decentralization that prioritizes qualified security over permissionless chaos.

Unlike purely permissionless chains where anyone can become a validator, Dusk's Segregated Byzantine Agreement (SBA) consensus initially relies on a permissioned set of "Provisioners." This isn't a permanent state, but a calculated starting point. These early validators are likely vetted entities—partners, institutional allies, or highly trusted community members—who can provide the robust, reliable uptime and regulatory accountability required to bootstrap a financial settlement layer. This ensures stability and compliance from day one, giving asset issuers the confidence to tokenize billion-euro bonds.

However, the roadmap points toward progressive decentralization. The $DUSK token is the key to this evolution. The long-term vision involves a staking mechanism where token holders can delegate to or become Provisioners, gradually expanding and diversifying the validator set. Crucially, this system may incorporate identity attestation or licensing for validators operating in a financial context, creating a "permissioned-but-decentralized" model. Think of it not as a closed club, but as a licensed stock exchange: not everyone can run a trading venue, but many qualified entities can, ensuring competition and resilience without sacrificing legal oversight.

This model creates a powerful synergy. The network gains the security benefits of a distributed validator set, making it resistant to attack or coercion. Meanwhile, regulators and institutions gain a clear, accountable framework for engagement. It transforms decentralization from a regulatory problem into a feature of institutional-grade security. For the ecosystem, a well-governed, decentralized network increases the intrinsic value of staking and participating, strengthening the utility bedrock of the $DUSK token itself.

Bottom Line: Dusk is redefining decentralization for the regulated world. It’s not about anonymous global nodes, but about creating a sufficiently distributed, qualified, and secure network of validators that institutions can trust. This careful, phased evolution from permissioned to permissionless-but-qualified may well become the blueprint for all serious financial blockchains.

#Dusk #Decentralization #Validators #Staking #Security $DUSK

見出し: CrossCurveブリッジハックが持続的なDeFiセキュリティリスクを浮き彫りにする
短いイントロ:
CrossCurveブリッジを標的とした最近の悪用は、分散型金融におけるセキュリティの脆弱性に対する懸念を再燃させました。DeFiプロトコルが複雑化し、TVL（ロックされた総額）が増加するにつれて、この分野はユーザーと規制当局の両方から新たな厳しい目にさらされています。
何が起こったか:
CrossCurve、クロスチェーンプロトコルはスマートコントラクトの悪用に遭い、攻撃者が約300万ドルを奪いました。このプロトコルは、攻撃者に72時間以内に資金を返還するよう促し、さもなければ利害関係者からの行動に直面することになると警告しました。