telegrammining

عاجل ومهم جدا ⭕️✉️ قوانين جديدة للأيردروب في تيليجرام:
1️⃣ القانون الأول:
يجب على جميع الأيردروب التي لم تُدرَج لأشهر طويلة (مثل TapSwap، WCoin، Blum، DotCoin، CEXio، YesCoin، WAGMI Hub وغيرها) أن تُدرَج بحلول نهاية شهر فبراير.
2️⃣ القانون الثاني:
عملية إدراج أي مشروع يجب ألا تستغرق أكثر من 6 أشهر، لأن التأخير قد يؤدي إلى استياء المستخدمين من تيليجرام.
3️⃣ القانون الثالث:
الأيردروب الموثوقة سيتم الإعلان عنها في القناة الشخصية لـ "باڤل دروف" (مالك تيليجرام).
أيضًا، سيقوم باڤل دروف بالاستثمار الشخصي في البوتات الموثوقة مما يسهل معرفة الأيردروب ذات المصداقية.
4️⃣ القانون الرابع:
البوتات التي تعمل على شبكات غير شبكة TON يجب أن تتوقف عن العمل على تيليجرام بحلول فبراير (مثل Pause, DotCoin, Seed وغيرها).
5️⃣ القانون الخامس:
يجب أن تُدرَج جميع الأيردروبات الجديدة على شبكة TON وإلا سيتم تصنيفها كاحتيال (Scam).
🤫 يبدو أن "باڤل دروف" أصدر هذه القوانين بعد اعتراضات كبيرة من المستخدمين بسبب استياءاتهم من المشاريع مثل Major, MemeFi وTapSwap وذلك بهدف منع أي خسائر في شعبية تيليجرام.
$NOT
#telegramMining #BinanceAlphaAlert #TRUMPTokenWatch

Social media platforms like Telegram have seen the proliferation of mining bots promising users easy access to cryptocurrency mining without requiring expensive equipment or advanced technical knowledge. Despite these claims, such bots have largely failed to make a meaningful impact on the adoption of cryptocurrencies. Here’s why:
1. Lack of Trust and Credibility
Many users distrust mining bots due to the prevalence of scams in the sector. These bots often serve as tools for data collection or fraud, deterring genuine cryptocurrency enthusiasts from engaging.
2. Lack of Transparency
Mining bots rarely provide clear information about their operations or how users can achieve profits. This opacity has alienated new users seeking reliable investment opportunities.
3. Increased Complexity of Traditional Mining
Cryptocurrency mining has become technically challenging, requiring specialized hardware and significant energy resources. Bots claiming to simplify these processes fail to convince users of their efficacy.
4. Regulatory Scrutiny
Governments worldwide have tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies, making users wary of unregulated platforms like these mining bots.
5. Concentration of Benefits Among Influencers and Established Investors
While these bots failed to attract new users, influencers and wealthy early investors have reaped significant benefits. Influencers leverage their platforms to promote bots and earn commissions, while large investors capitalize on these systems to reinforce their positions. This creates a sense of exclusivity, discouraging broader participation.
6. Market Saturation and Declining Motivation
With cryptocurrencies experiencing cycles of volatility and market saturation, enthusiasm has waned. For newcomers, the diminishing economic rewards further reduce the appeal of mining bots.
Conclusion
The failure of Telegram mining bots highlights broader challenges in the cryptocurrency sector. The dominance of influencers and established investors, coupled with a lack of transparency and increasing regulations, has hindered the appeal of these tools. To revive interest and ensure sustainable growth, the sector must prioritize secure and transparent models that genuinely engage new users.
#BTC #telegrambot #telegramMining #doge⚡ #MarketSentimentToday
$BTC

Big Moves Behind the Scenes
Telegram CEO Pavel Durov dropped a bombshell at the recent TON Ecosystem Summit: the TON Foundation hasn’t spent a dime on aggressive marketing or liquidity pumps—unlike rival Layer 1 blockchains that rely on flashy campaigns and token dumps to attract users. Instead, they’re doubling down on real-world utility within Telegram’s 900-million-user ecosystem. 🤯

The Billion-Dollar Question: Why No Hype?
While chains like Solana and Base chase speculative trading volume, TON is quietly embedding itself into Telegram’s core features:
- Ads Payment: Advertisers now buy ads exclusively with TON, funneling millions into the ecosystem monthly.
- Revenue Sharing: Channel owners earn 50% of ad revenue in TON—creating instant demand.
- Fiat On-Ramps: Partnerships with platforms like HashKey let users buy TON directly in-app, no crypto exchange needed.

Yet, TON’s price remains relatively stable. Why? 🤔
The Hidden Strategy: Utility Over Hype
Insiders hint that TON’s team is playing chess, not checkers. By avoiding liquidity pumps, they’re:
1️⃣ Building Infrastructure First: Prioritizing seamless integration of wallets, decentralized apps (dApps), and NFT marketplaces within Telegram.
2️⃣ Avoiding “Pump-and-Dump” Traps: Letting value grow organically as users need TON for services—not just speculation.
3️⃣ Preparing for Mass Adoption: With Telegram’s user base, TON could become the first crypto to onboard billions without complex onboarding.

What’s Next for TON?
The stakes are high. If Telegram succeeds:
- NFTs & SocialFi: Creators could monetize content via TON-powered NFTs or tokenized communities.
- DeFi Surge: Telegram’s mini-app ecosystem might host lending protocols or DEXs, rivaling Ethereum.
- Regulatory Hurdles: Watchdog scrutiny is inevitable, but Telegram’s privacy-first ethos could win trust.

The Bottom Line
TON’s team isn’t chasing short-term gains. Their gamble? That utility-driven adoption will outlast hype cycles. If Telegram’s ecosystem thrives, TON could redefine how crypto scales—no memecoins required.

Keep Watching: The next 12 months could turn TON into the dark horse of Web3. 🏇

Thoughts? Is TON’s “slow and steady” approach genius… or too risky? Drop your take below!* 💬