zerohunter

🖤 GOT A CRYPTO QUESTION?

Don’t overthink it.

Got a coin you want researched?
Need help understanding a project?
Setting up a new crypto account?

Confused about a chart, narrative or market move?

Ask it here. 👇

🔎 Small research requests
📚 Free educational help
🧠 Quick explanations
⚡ Market observations
🆕 New-user guidance
💬 Community discussion

I may not answer every question,
but if it’s useful to the community, I’ll try to help.

Small questions. Free help.
Real research. No gatekeeping.

And who knows—
your question might help 100 others too. 🤝

— Zero Hunter 🖤

Zero Hunter Chat Group

#ZeroHunter #CryptoResearch #cryptoeducation #Web3Community #CryptoCommunity

ZERO → 1,000. 🖤

But honestly…

The number is not what I’m celebrating today.

I’m celebrating the PEOPLE behind that number. 🤝

When Zero Hunter was still at ZERO, some of you were already there — supporting, replying, sharing, encouraging, and giving me that little push to keep going.

Today, I want to give those people their flowers. 🌹

Huge respect to:

@CipherX 零号

@Solana Diva

@Elena神话MUA

@Hawk自由哥

@奋斗Hustle1688

@神秘小K钱

@辛迪cindy

@钞机八蛋

@帮帮Bonnie

@晚风Vesper_1688

@听澜321

@币盈Anna

@蓓蓓大王

@路飞社区糖宝Luffy

@周周1688

@英鸿³³₇

You didn't just give me a follow.

You gave Zero Hunter momentum. 🫡

ZERO → 1K was only the beginning.

I remember the people who helped me get here.

Now the real hunt begins. 🐺

Next stop: 10K.

Much love. Much respect. ❤️

And to everyone who has been part of this journey — even if your name isn't on this list — I see you.

👉 Follow and stay connected. More quizzes, rewards & crypto research coming.

Good luck, Crypto Family! 🚀

—Sulaiman Zero Hunter

#ZeroHunter #ZeroResearch #Sulaiman零号猎人

Why ZeroHunter? I look at how a token could go to zero before I look at how it could go up. Unlock calendars first, then who actually holds the supply.

It started with LUNA, where I lost about 750 USDT because I skipped one step.

Some weeks the honest post is: I'm staying out.

Which token should I check next?

#ZeroHunter #ZeroResearch #Sulaiman零号猎人 .
$SAND $ENJ $GALA

If you hold $XLM , you probably checked the chart more than once today.

37% in a day. Stellar. RWA.

That's not just a pump. That's the story you've been waiting for.

And the first thought is obvious: "Finally. This is the one."

I had it too.

Then a quieter question showed up:

When a tokenized treasury lives on Stellar, who actually gets paid?

Not XLM, at least not directly. The value sits in the treasuries and stablecoins. XLM is just the road they travel on.

And the fee burn is tiny, so more traffic doesn't do much for holders today.

That's the part that gets mixed up:

Stellar's RWA activity is growing.
XLM holders benefit from it.

The first can be true without the second.

Then there's the exchange data. XLM moving to exchanges is up about 160%.

That's not proof of selling. But it's not the confirmation I'd want right after a 37% move either.

So I'm not calling XLM broken.

I'm asking something simpler: did something get repriced, or did one big candle just find a very good story?

What would change my mind:
RWA growth that lasts longer than a day.
Real, sustained demand for XLM.
Fee mechanics that connect Stellar activity to the token.

Until then, it's a candle I'm watching, not a thesis I'm buying.

#XLM #RWA #Stellar #ZeroHunter #ZeroResearch
$RLC

Every $HYPE holder gets the same thought near the 29th:

"Buyback is nice… but what if the unlock is bigger?"

Same. The calendar allows about $918M a month. Scary.

But what actually unlocked on Sept 6 was about $40M.

Buyback run-rate is roughly $79M a month, close to double that. (The new $14.58M hadn't reached the fund yet when I checked.)

So the fear was aimed at the wrong number.

Still, Oct 29 shows 14.2M HYPE, about $1.3B, on the calendar. If actual moves toward schedule, it flips.

Not "is the buyback big enough?" but "how long does actual stay below allowed?"

Not financial advice.
$RAD
$API3
#HYPE #Hyperliquid #Buyback #ZeroHunter #ZeroResearch

The company that clears $2 trillion a day just picked Quant.

I searched the announcement for one word: $QNT

Nothing.

The token ran from the $60s to a spike near $373 in days. The headline felt like proof, but the middle step is missing.

What we know: Quant will run the interoperability and transaction layer for The Clearing House's On-Chain Money Initiative. TCH is owned by 25 of the biggest US banks. Access opens in H1 2027.

What we don't: any requirement for banks to hold QNT, any fee schedule, any burn tied to volume.

Quant does have a path. Licenses are paid in fiat, and the Quant Treasury converts that into locked QNT. But Quant getting paid and QNT getting bought are two different events.

The partnership is real. I'm still looking for where the money touches the token.

Not financial advice.

#QNT #TokenizedDeposits #CryptoResearch #ZeroHunter #ZeroResearch
$ZRO
$STG

$100 million went into $PLUME . Not one dollar of it bought the token.

If you saw the Ether.fi headline and wondered why PLUME barely reacted, this is probably why. The money went into Nest vaults, which hold tokenized yield products. As far as I can find, PLUME's job is gas, staking and governance. I found no revenue share and no buyback.

Meanwhile, the "20% float" number people still quote is the launch figure. Roughly 60% circulates now, and about 2% of total supply unlocks every month through January 2028. That's a slow drip with no revenue claim to absorb it.

The usage side is real, though. RWA.xyz shows around 260,000 holders, which is rare at this size. But sources disagree on capital: Plume cited $645M at its Q3 2025 peak, while RWA.xyz showed about $177M excluding stablecoins in August. Holders stayed, and the capital may have thinned.

My read: the network can win while the token doesn't. Those are two different bets, and Plume is where they're easiest to confuse.

I'm watching two things. Does vault revenue ever reach PLUME, and does staking demand grow enough to absorb the monthly unlocks?

Are you holding Plume for the network or for the token?

#Plume #RWA #Tokenomics #ZeroHunter #ZeroResearch

If you hold $ONDO , seeing BlackRock next to Ondo feels good.

Same here. But a quiet question probably crossed your mind too:

"Okay… but what do I get out of it?"

Fair question.

BlackRock built the strategies behind Ondo's first three Intelligent Portfolios. KakaoPay Securities signed an MOU to explore tokenized Korean stocks. That's real progress for Ondo, the company.

But ONDO, the token, is a governance token. It doesn't automatically capture that growth.

It's like having a seat at the residents' meeting while the rent goes to the landlord. The meeting matters. It's just not the rent.

Supply adds to the doubt. About half of the 10B ONDO is already unlocked, and roughly 17-19% of total supply unlocks on Jan 18, 2027.

A fee switch could change the picture. But how it's built matters: revenue paid to holders, or used for buybacks? Those are two very different tokens.

I'm not bearish on Ondo. The RWA growth is real. I'm just separating Ondo's success from ONDO's value capture.

Another partnership won't answer that. The token design will.

Not financial advice.

#ONDO #RWA #Tokenization #ZeroHunter #ZeroResearch
$GMX
$RAY

Today, 1.4 billion $ENA unlocks, about 14% of circulating supply. But Ethena already bought out the locked tokens of investors who sold after the peak.

So who is selling today?

And the buyback that's supposed to absorb this supply isn't running. The fee switch passed, but buybacks only start once USDe supply reaches $7.5 billion. Depending on the source, it sits around $4–5 billion. Approved and active are doing different jobs.

Whoever receives tokens today is, by definition, someone who held this long. One seller wallet declined the buyout, and there's no proof the rest keep holding. But it isn't the same seller pool the chart may be bracing for.

The flows disagree too. A wallet dormant for over a year sent 30 million ENA, about $7 million, to Binance. Wallets linked to Ethena were also pulling large amounts of ENA off exchanges. One looks like selling. The other doesn't.

One gap I couldn't close: sources disagree on the buyback mechanics. Is it 95% of net revenue, or a tiered 5% to 20% that scales with USDe supply? I couldn't reconcile them from primary docs, and that difference is most of the mechanism's value.

My read: "buyback coming" is the narrative. "Buyback running" isn't reality yet. The unlock risk is real, but smaller than the headline suggests, because the loudest sellers were removed in advance.

What I'm watching: USDe supply moving toward $7.5B, and whether recipient wallets start sending to exchanges over the next few weeks. Standard Chartered's $2 target assumes USDe reaches $40B by 2028. That's a forecast of the growth the buyback needs, not evidence it's arriving.

(The bigger 3.03B figure in some headlines is a different thing, still gated by Foundation consent. The 1.4B is what opens without restriction today.)

A conditional buyback doesn't pay you for supply arriving today. But a buyout that already removed the sellers might.

#ENA #Ethena #TokenUnlock #ZeroHunter #ZeroResearch

$766M stolen in September. 92% of it came from just two incidents.

PeckShield counted 55 major incidents and about $766M in losses, making September 2026 the worst month of the year.

But break the number down. According to CertiK, Bitget ($387.5M) and Liquid Network ($318.7M) together account for about 92%. Every other incident combined adds up to roughly $62M.

The two cases were also completely different. Per reports, Bitget's hot and warm wallets were hit. At Liquid, a code flaw allowed fake L-BTC to be created.

Neither is the usual DeFi story of "TVL is growing and there's an audit."

My read: risk is more concentrated than it looks. The big losses happen where a lot of assets depend on a few keys or a single mechanism.

Limits: two incidents don't prove a pattern, and I haven't read the full post-mortems yet. Also, about $273M was frozen or returned, so net losses were closer to $495M.

Where you keep your assets, do you know how many people or keys could move everything out?

⚠️ Not financial advice.

#CryptoSecurity #CryptoHacks #Bitget #LiquidNetwork #ZeroHunter

$BTC $ETH $BNB

Saturday's green candle had everyone asking the same thing: "Am I late?"

STRK rose about 23% in 24 hours, to ~$0.05.

One news source says the likely trigger is this: Starknet announced it will cover the bridge fees for the first 100 BTC brought in through strkBTC, with staking rewards on top.

But something else caught my eye.

Everyone is watching the price. I'm watching the volume. Over $88M traded in 24 hours against a market cap of ~$375M. That's roughly 23% of the entire market cap changing hands in a day (my math). That doesn't look like a thin-book pump. People are actually buying.

Still, waiving fees is buying users, not organic demand. It's a marketing cost. The real question is how many stay when the subsidy ends.

My read: the news isn't bad, but the market may have priced a lot of it in already. The price is up ~59% from July's ~$0.032, and RSI is in overbought territory.

Two more things I'm keeping on the radar:

Monthly unlocks are running (~127M STRK, through March 2027). The next one is around Oct 15, though I couldn't confirm the exact date. At today's price that's ~1.7% of market cap. Not a big hit, but in a crowded trade even small news feels big.
A v0.14.4 upgrade is rumored for tomorrow. I haven't verified the date from an official source.

What strengthens this thesis: volume holds after the jump, price breaks and holds above the $0.06 resistance, and strkBTC usage keeps growing after the subsidy.

What breaks it: price drops straight down instead of consolidating, or Starknet's own announcement shows the trigger was something else entirely.

So here's my question: on catalyst days, do you buy early or wait for the price to cool down? And which one has cost you more regret?

#ZeroHunter #STRK #Starknet #BTCFi #ZeroResearch

I bought $GLMR at $2.70. 😂

I kept buying for two years. I closed in late 2024 with a 2,000 USDT loss.

Here's the strange part. The token I bought no longer exists in the form I bought it.

I bought a Polkadot parachain token. GLMR paid gas fees on that chain. Then in July 2026, Moonbeam moved the whole token to Base and rebuilt itself as an AI agent network. The original thesis is gone.

When I researched it again in September, I found daily protocol fees of about $13. Market cap around $8M. A pre-revenue bet on a product that wasn't live yet.

Looking back, a few things hurt:

A good story and a good price are not the same thing.
Holding for two years isn't a strategy. Time doesn't fix a thesis that's broken.
I kept buying while the thing I believed in kept changing.

GLMR just jumped almost 40% today. I looked for a reason and couldn't find one. No announcement, no listing. I don't hold it, and a green candle isn't a reason to go back.

I'm not telling anyone what to do. I'm telling you what two years of "I'll wait for it to come back" cost me.

What's the longest you've held a coin after the story behind it had already changed?

Not financial advice. Just my own experience.

#GLMR #Moonbeam #CryptoRisk #ZeroHunter
$MOVR $DOT

Do The Bank Need the Token?

Everyone is watching the bank deal. I wanted to know one thing first. Do the banks need the token?

The deal is real. On Sept 24, The Clearing House picked Quant to build the tech for its On-Chain Money Initiative. TCH networks clear more than $2T a day. Institutions are expected to get access in the first half of 2027.

That is a big win for the company. But company success and token success are two different things.

Here is what I found. Quant's FAQ says platform fees can be paid in US dollars. QNT is one option for subscriptions. A report says the deal does not require banks to hold or pay in QNT. The actual terms are private, so I'm saying "not shown," not "doesn't exist." The token's role could be bigger than the public papers suggest.

Now the price. QNT went from about $60-70 to a peak near $372 on Sept 27. It is now back below $300, and my screenshot shows $256.88. That is a big move in about two weeks, with the launch still months away. Part of the rally also looked like a futures short squeeze.

What would make me more interested is Quant or TCH publishing a fee model that requires or favors QNT. What would make me back off is confirmation that fees are paid in fiat only.

I also haven't verified the supply numbers. The 14.9M max and 12M+ circulating figures came from a commentator, so check them against official data.

Has anyone seen a contract or term sheet that names QNT as required? That one document would settle most of this.

NFA

#ZeroResearch #ZeroHunter #QNT #RWA

I got one $SAND number wrong. The corrected story is more useful.

Yesterday $SAND had a huge day. In my earlier post I used a supply number that I have now replaced.

What I got wrong
I said about 500M extra coins appeared, roughly one in six. That came from an early alert. Later counts were much higher. PeckShield reported about 14.9B unbacked coins minted. But they were trapped on Base and BNB Chain after the bridges were shut. Ethereum supply stayed at 3B. The real drain was about 14.75M SAND, around 0.5% of max supply.

The 3 checks I use now

Access. Bithumb's own notice says the Korean caution was lifted on 2 Oct, with deposits and withdrawals set to resume at 16:00. Upbit's notice says the same for SAND/KRW and SAND/BTC, but I only saw it reproduced by a news site. Access came back. That is a real change.

Supply. The Sandbox is repaying affected holders 1:1 from its treasury, with no new tokens minted. That fixes a past problem. It does not create new demand.

Leverage. A 3 Oct report puts open interest near $1.46B across exchanges, about 6.4x the market cap, with about $13.5M in liquidations. Open interest is the total size of open futures bets. When it is that big, a news event can turn into a squeeze.

Not checked yet: where the attacker wallets hold coins today, and Binance-only funding and open interest.

What would change my view: open interest rising while volume fades, the caution returning, or attacker wallets sending coins to exchanges.

A 60%+ day shows attention. It does not show the project got stronger. No price levels from me.

Which of the three checks do you run first on a pumping coin?

I don't hold $SAND

NFA

#ZeroResearch #ZeroHunter #SAND

How I checked why $SAND jumped 71% today

About one in six. That is how many extra SAND coins appeared after an exploit in late August. Lookonchain, a public tracker, reported more than 500 million new coins. The most SAND can ever exist is 3 billion.
Those coins were not supposed to exist. Soon after, Upbit put a trading caution on SAND, and Bithumb paused deposits and withdrawals. Both are big Korean exchanges. Upbit's review window ran into this week. Today SAND is up about 71%.

So I tried to find out why. I read the exchange notices as reported by news sites. I checked the dates against the price jump on the chart. I also tried to compare price levels from a summary site against the live price. They did not match, so I threw that page out.

Here is what looks odd to me. Some people say the caution was lifted on 2 October. I could not confirm that. I only found the review window. The news sites do not show where the 500 million new coins went either. If they sit untouched, fine. If they move to exchanges, that is a lot of coins that could be sold. I have not yet looked at the public wallet records for this. That is my next check.
One more thing. A 71% day tells you people are excited. It does not tell you the project got stronger.

If you are thinking about trading it, here is how I would think. It only makes sense to me if the exchanges' own notices show the caution is gone. You also need to be able to sell without pushing the price down, and I have not verified that for SAND. I would stay out if trading volume fades fast, if the caution comes back, or if the new coins start moving to exchanges. I have no price levels for you, because the only ones I found were unreliable. Keep the size small enough that losing all of it would not hurt. Borrowed money (leverage) on a day like this is dangerous, because a sharp drop can wipe the trade before you react.

Has anyone seen the official Upbit or Bithumb notice saying the caution was lifted?
I watching $SAND NFA

#sand #ZeroResearch #ZeroHunter

Three very different tokens. One question: where could the next wave of liquidity go?

🐾 ZERO HUNTER RADAR

$PUMP → $0.01
$BTC → $100,000
$ARB → $0.50

These are upcoming watch levels, not promises.

BTC sets the broader market tone.
PUMP brings higher-beta exposure.
ARB gives another infrastructure-focused angle.

Different assets. Different mechanics.

But the same rule:

Don't chase the move. Hunt the setup before the crowd.

No FOMO.
Let price confirm the thesis.

Which one are you holding for the next phase?

#PUMP #BTC #ARB #ZeroHunter #ShortSqueeze

Not every fast move deserves attention. Sometimes the real question is what happens next.

🐾 THE NEXT-WAVE WATCHLIST

$THETA → $0.50
$NOM → $0.01
$HBAR → $0.25

These are upcoming watch levels, not guaranteed outcomes.

If liquidity returns to these narratives and momentum confirms, the distance between today's price and these levels becomes the part worth studying.

I don't chase a green candle.

I watch where attention could move next.

Hold patiently. Watch confirmation. Manage risk.

Which one is already sitting in your bag?

#THETA #NOM #HBAR #ZeroHunter #mostsearched

Some holders are waiting quietly. The next move could make the wait interesting. 👀

🐾 ZERO HUNTER WATCHLIST

$QNT → $300
$ONDO → $5
$SUI → $2

These aren't promises. They're upcoming levels worth watching if momentum, liquidity and market structure continue to align.

The interesting part?

The crowd usually notices a token after the move starts.

I prefer watching the setup before attention gets crowded.

No FOMO. No blind conviction.
Just patience, confirmation and risk management.

Which one are you already holding?

#QNT #ONDO #SUİ #ZeroHunter #mostsearched