During the 2026 Spring Festival (February 17 to February 19, specifically the first to the third day of the Lunar New Year), the market performance of Bitcoin ($BTC) and Ethereum ($ETH) showed significant post-holiday corrections and low-level consolidation characteristics.
Here is the specific market review and analysis: 1. Bitcoin (#BTC): Continuous decline, searching for support During these three days of the Spring Festival, BTC experienced a fluctuating bottom-seeking process after retreating from its pre-holiday high: * First day of the Lunar New Year (February 17): Opened around $68,852. Affected by weakened liquidity during the Asia-Pacific holiday, it showed a downward trend throughout the day and broke below the $68,000 mark in the afternoon, reaching a low of $66,837. * Second to third day (February 18-19): Market sentiment continued to be sluggish, and prices further declined. By noon on the third day, BTC dropped to around $66,520, with a cumulative decline of about 3.5% over the three days. * Analysis: This trend aligns with the "Spring Festival Effect," where profit-taking occurs during long holidays, and the market lacks new positive news stimulation, resulting in a notable weakening of bullish forces below the $70,000 mark.
2. Ethereum (ETH): Continuous decline, key levels lost ETH's performance during the Spring Festival was weaker than BTC, and its technical formation continued to deteriorate: * Price range: ETH's price fluctuated downward from above $2,000 before the holiday. During the first to third days, it mainly hovered in the $1,960 - $1,980 range, with multiple unsuccessful attempts to regain the $2,000 mark. * Technical resistance: Currently, ETH is in a downward channel, hindered by the 21-day moving average (approximately $1,995). Indicators show that due to overall weakness since the beginning of 2026, ETH is filling the gaps below. * Operational signals: Market analysis generally believes that ETH faces downward pressure in the short term. If it cannot effectively stabilize above $2,050, it may further test strong support around $1,800.
Core conclusion: From the first to the third day of the 2026 Spring Festival, the cryptocurrency market is overall in a state of "post-holiday syndrome," with prices primarily correcting downward. This is mainly due to a large amount of profit-taking from the 2025 bull market being realized during the holiday, and a lack of incremental funds entering the market during this period.
The trend of $AEON recently looks very strong and is definitely worth paying close attention to.
From the 4H candlestick chart, it went through a relatively long consolidation period at the beginning, with a low pullback to around 0.05115.
After that, trading volume gradually increased, the price began to rise, and it broke through the resistance level. The high reached over 0.07+, and it is currently consolidating around 0.0769.
Overall, it has formed a fairly typical pattern:
Low-level consolidation → volume expansion → breakout → second confirmation
From 0.05115 to 0.0769, the staged rise is already close to 50%.
Now the market’s attention on $AEON may be shifting from a “new coin rally” toward real-world applications.
The launch on Binance Alpha brings the first round of liquidity and attention. If it can still maintain strength after the listing, it suggests the market is starting to reassess AEON’s fundamentals.
Especially recently, the narrative around AI Agent Payment / x402 has been heating up again.
AI Agents move from “chatting” to “execution.” When agents carry out tasks, payment needs are generated. In the future, whether it’s buying APIs, compute power, data, or Agent-to-Agent payments, new payment infrastructure will be required.
And AEON sits right at the intersection of:
AI Agent + Crypto Payments + Settlement
So in the short term, I’ll focus on whether volume and price can continue to expand and break out further. In the long term, I’ll look at the real payment network and the rollout of Agent Payments.
If this logic keeps playing out, the pricing of $AEON may gradually move from a “new coin” narrative to AI payment infrastructure.
$NIULAI|This wave is actually kind of interesting 👀 The “shadow-coin symbiosis” narrative directly connects the movie IP with Meme gameplay. By leveraging the film traffic of《牛来》, they’re trying to open a real gateway from Web2 to Web3—building a “coin lane” supported by an actual IP story. More importantly, the DEV team isn’t weak. They’ve previously built several projects that went up by tens of thousands of times, which is also why I’m paying attention to $NIULAI. Right now is the moment when market attention is rapidly consolidating. IP + Meme + film traffic means there’s definitely plenty of narrative room. If the distribution of the movie IP really takes off later on, the imagination won’t be limited to just a typical Meme. 👀 $NIULAI is worth watching early. Contract: 0x3604b5c377124d2180c4fb791953fc8431a90111 NFA, DYOR.
$AKE This wave is really ruthless. In 7 days it has jumped 150%+, and yesterday it even surged straight to $0.0154 at one point; today it has clearly started to retreat. What this kind of coin fears most is people getting carried away and chasing longs.
Instead, I’ll focus mainly on the area around $0.010. If it holds, there’s still an expectation of a second spike; if the rebound lacks strength and it breaks below this level, then the short trade’s odds on the futures contract actually look more comfortable—first looking for the area around $0.008.
In short: Hold above $0.01 → take a low-long to bet on the rebound Break below $0.01 → short in line with the move
AKE isn’t that there’s no opportunity now—it's just that the volatility is too high, so the futures contract must include a stop-loss. For coins that explode like this, what really gets people excited is often the second leg of the move.
$LAB This round, the shorts may finally get to feel comfortable. Down from the high level earlier, and today it keeps grinding back and forth around $0.08. The rebounds don’t show much strength.
With this kind of price action, I usually don’t rush to buy the dip. Instead, I’ll wait for it to fail to rebound, and then look for another opportunity to short.
If $0.08 can’t hold, my next watch level is $0.075. After a breakdown, there may be more room for downside to open up. Of course, if it suddenly rallies with heavy volume back above $0.09, then shorts would need to run.
In this kind of market, both bulls and bears can trade. But personally, I’m more biased toward the short side. After all, in a weak market, the scariest thing is catching a thrown knife. $LAB
$COW This move is kind of interesting today. The 24H price increase is close to +80%~90%, and the trading volume has clearly expanded as well—this isn’t just a simple range-grinding market anymore.
I’m more focused on whether this surge in volume can turn into a trend, rather than chasing the first big bullish candle.
If it can pull back and hold steady around $0.16, I think there’s still an expectation of further upside; if it surges on higher volume and then drops straight back, then we need to be careful about profit-takers dumping.
For this kind of stock, the biggest fear isn’t missing the opportunity—it’s getting in when sentiment is at its hottest.
I’d be more inclined to wait for the pullback to confirm; if a second acceleration actually shows up, that’s even more worth watching. $COW
Last night, the U.S. July CPI came out. Overall, it was basically in line with expectations and didn’t create too many surprises for the market.
The CPI year-over-year was 3.4%, core CPI was 2.5%, and month-over-month rose by 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively—everything was essentially in line with expectations. After the data was released, U.S. stocks were somewhat stronger, but BTC’s reaction was rather muted; at one point it even slipped below the $64,000 area.
I think the biggest significance of this CPI for the crypto market isn’t that it directly sparks a fresh round of explosive gains, but rather that: At least for now, it doesn’t give the Federal Reserve a new reason to remain more hawkish.
Previously, the nonfarm payrolls already showed clear signs of cooling, and inflation hasn’t re-accelerated either. Concerns about September policy have eased somewhat.
But the issue is that the CPI is only “in line with expectations,” not clearly below them—so the rate-cut trade hasn’t been fully ignited for the moment.
For BTC, what matters more next is liquidity and the Fed’s outlook. If employment continues to weaken and inflation keeps drifting downward gradually, the market will start pricing in rate cuts again, and the capital environment for BTC, ETH, and high-beta altcoins will improve significantly.
My view: Short term: consolidating upward, but it’s not time to directly kick off a one-way rally. Medium term: if subsequent data continues to support the rate-cut outlook, there’s still room for risk assets to move higher.
So right now I’d rather wait for BTC to break out, instead of FOMO’ing just because a CPI that’s in line with expectations came out.
The worst period for macro may be behind us, but the true liquidity inflection point still needs more data confirmation.
Tonight at 20:30, the U.S. CPI for July is about to be released.
I think the market will be fairly sensitive this time.
At present, expectations are CPI YoY at 3.4% and core CPI at 2.5%. If the data comes in below expectations, rate-cut expectations may keep heating up, U.S. Treasury yields and the dollar could face downward pressure, and U.S. tech stocks and risk assets like BTC will likely first get a bout of positive sentiment.
On the other hand, if core CPI is clearly higher than 2.5%, then things will get troublesome—the rate-cut expectations that were just ignited by the weak nonfarm payrolls could be pushed back down again, and both U.S. stocks and crypto could see a quick pullback.
Personally, I lean toward CPI cooling moderately, so tonight the short-term bias is slightly bullish.
For crypto, the key point isn’t the CPI itself, but what happens after the data comes out:
Dollar ↓ + U.S. Treasury yields ↓ + Rate-cut expectations ↑ = $BTC / $ETH slightly favorable
If this combination shows up, BTC may have a chance to continue probing higher, and capital could also flow back toward ETH and high-beta altcoins.
But if core CPI comes in above expectations, don’t rush to buy the dip—tonight could very likely start with a round of intense stop-sweeping.
In this move tonight, the data is just the fuse; what truly determines the market is how participants will reprice the September Fed.
Do you think tonight’s CPI will be below expectations, or will it hit the market with another round of disappointment?
Tonight’s nonfarm payrolls are out, and the US stock market gets “bad news as good news”?
Tonight’s US July nonfarm data came in below expectations:
📉 Nonfarm payrolls fell by 23,000 📉 The market previously expected an increase of about 80,000 📉 Wage growth slowed to 3.2%
There are signs that the job market is cooling. 
But the market reaction is surprisingly interesting.
After the data was released, US stocks didn’t panic and drop—instead, they rose.
The reason is simple:
The market isn’t trading a worsening economy. Instead it’s trading:
Job-market cooling → easing inflation pressure → more room for the Fed to cut rates
As rate-cut expectations heat up, it provides support for tech stocks and growth assets. The Nasdaq has been relatively strong, and funds are flowing back into risk assets. 
For the crypto market, this is also an important signal.
Over the past few months, risk assets such as $BTC and $ETH have been heavily influenced by rate expectations.
If economic data continues to weaken later on, but does not slip into a recession:
✅ Downward pressure on the US dollar could ease ✅ Liquidity expectations may improve ✅ Valuations for high-risk assets may rise
However, it’s important to note:
Weak employment is a double-edged sword.
If future data keeps deteriorating and the market begins to worry about a recession, the logic could shift from “hoping for rate cuts” to “fearing growth” — and risk assets may come under pressure again.
In the short term:
Tonight’s nonfarm payrolls have sent a somewhat dovish signal to the market.
Next, watch:
1️⃣ Remarks from Fed officials 2️⃣ Upcoming CPI data 3️⃣ Whether BTC can break through a key resistance level
Right now, the market is pricing in a new expectation:
The economy is cooling, but the liquidity turning point may be approaching.
August 7 Crypto Market Analysis|BTC holds key levels as the market enters an “awaiting data” phase
As of now, the global total crypto market cap is about $2.19 trillion, down roughly 0.9% over the past 24 hours. Bitcoin’s market share has risen to 58.85%, remaining at a high level. This indicates that capital is still tilted toward mainstream assets, while altcoins overall are still performing weaker than BTC.
Bitcoin remains the stabilizing force in the market.
$BTC is currently holding around $64,000, trading sideways. There has been a slight pullback of about 1% in the past 24 hours. Although it hasn’t broken to new highs, there is still underlying support and no sign of a capitulation sell-off with heavy volume. Compared with the past few days, overall market sentiment has clearly stabilized.
$ETH , on the other hand, is relatively weaker. It is currently consolidating around $1,900. In the short term, its trend still lags behind Bitcoin. More of the capital is still flowing into BTC rather than broadly rotating back into the altcoin market.
There’s also one very clear signal on the recent order flow.
Bitcoin’s market share continues to rise, but the total market trading volume has not expanded in tandem.
This suggests institutional capital is still allocating to Bitcoin, while there is no obvious influx of incremental capital from the sidelines. For most altcoins, this kind of environment remains uncomfortable—there may be hotspots, but it will be hard to see a broad-based rally where most altcoins surge together.
So we still shouldn’t easily say, “Altseason is here.”
On the macro front, what the market is truly waiting for is the upcoming U.S. economic data.
Whether it’s CPI or employment data, it will directly affect market expectations for the Federal Reserve’s rate-cut path. If inflation continues to cool, risk assets could see further repair; if the data runs hotter than expected, expectations for higher interest rates may rise again, and short-term volatility in the crypto market is likely to increase.
Therefore, over the past few days it feels more like capital has moved into a wait-and-see mode in advance.
My view:
At present, BTC’s overall structure is still relatively strong. As long as it can hold key support levels, after the consolidation there may still be opportunities to challenge higher.
However, before macro data is confirmed, I’m more inclined to define the current situation as “consolidation building strength,” rather than the start of a new major uptrend.
What’s truly worth watching isn’t just how many percentage points it goes up or down today, but when capital returns to altcoins—and whether market trading volume can expand at the same time.
The above is for personal opinion only and does not constitute investment advice. DYOR.
The biggest feature of last night’s U.S. stock market was that clear differentiation began to emerge.
All three major indexes closed lower together: the Dow fell 0.85%, the S&P 500 declined 0.18%, and the Nasdaq only slipped 0.06%. The indexes looked somewhat weak, but tech stocks did not show panic selling. The market felt more like a normal rotation at elevated levels.
What truly drove market sentiment were two things.
First, international oil prices rose again. Uncertainty in the Middle East pushed crude oil higher. U.S. Treasury yields moved up in tandem, and the market started pricing in inflation risk once more.
Second, ahead of the release of the Nonfarm Payrolls report, capital clearly became more cautious. After consecutive gains, many institutions chose to lock in some profits first, then wait for new macro data to provide direction.
At the individual stock level, the divergence was even more pronounced last night.
The AI theme is still far from extinguished, but the market has become more selective.
The storage sector faced the most pressure. SanDisk fell by about 6.8% intraday, while Western Digital dropped more than 13%. Although the two companies’ overall performance isn’t bad, the market was not satisfied with their forward guidance. This suggests that capital is no longer only looking at whether there is growth—it now demands that growth continues to beat expectations.
By contrast, large-cap tech names such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, and Meta saw relatively limited overall movement. They did not experience a clear wave of catch-up declines despite the index pullback. This indicates that institutional funds still treat AI as a core allocation direction, but they have shifted from chasing valuations to screening for companies that can truly deliver results.
Another thing worth watching is that SpaceX actually rose against the trend, up more than 6%. Earlier, the market worried that the end of the IPO lock-up period would bring substantial selling pressure, but in reality the selling pressure was lower than expected. Funds chose to flow back in, which also suggests that high-momentum growth stocks still have strong ability to attract demand.
For the crypto market, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing.
As long as the AI tech main theme isn’t damaged, overall risk appetite for Bitcoin and the broader crypto market will still have support. But in the short term, what will truly determine the direction is still the U.S. macro data that is about to be released.
What the market is trading now isn’t yesterday—it’s the future.
The above is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Do your own research (DYOR).
As perpetual DEX evolves to today, it’s not just about the trading experience anymore—it’s about who can manage liquidity more precisely.
Let me first share a point that left a deep impression on me from my recent research on HertzFlow. When many people discuss perpetual DEXs, they talk about matching speed, trading fees, or the trading experience. But what truly determines whether a system can operate long-term is liquidity. Whether traders make money or lose money, in the end it all feeds back into the liquidity side. The real issue LPs face is never whether there is a return, but whether the returns and the risks can be matched. Most traditional liquidity pools adopt the approach of a shared pool of funds. Put all funds together to provide liquidity to multiple trading markets jointly. The benefit is that capital utilization is higher, but the cost is just as direct—once a market experiences sharp volatility, even resulting in one-sided profits, the impact often propagates to the entire liquidity pool, and all LPs must share the burden together.
In on-chain trading, the biggest value of AI isn’t prediction—it’s speed.
When many people first encounter AI, they hope it can simply tell them what to buy and what to sell.
But the market has never offered a standard answer. The outcome of a trade is often determined less by who knows more, and more by who can turn information into judgment faster.
The crypto market changes too quickly.
A single trend can ferment within just a few hours. One on-chain data point, or one community update, can all affect the subsequent direction. If you still have to work it out yourself—scrolling through X, checking the chain, digging up data one by one—by the time you’ve gathered everything, the opportunity is often already gone.
That’s also the biggest takeaway from my experience with @Velvet_Capital.
It doesn’t make the decision for you. Instead, it consolidates information that was originally scattered across multiple platforms. Hot tokens, on-chain activity, community sentiment, and AI analysis—everything can be seen quickly in a single interface, saving you a huge amount of time spent switching back and forth and filtering.
I’m increasingly convinced that AI’s real purpose is never to replace traders.
What matters is delegating those repetitive, time-consuming research tasks to AI, so you can put more energy into positions, risk, and strategy.
After all, even the most experienced people can’t possibly watch every change in the market.
But if you have tools that continually help you track, organize, and summarize the key points, then what you need to do is just decide which information is worth trusting, and which opportunities are worth acting on.
In the future, trading may come down not to who has more information, but to who can complete decisions faster.
AI improves efficiency; traders take responsibility for the results.
That division of labor is, in my view, where AI is most valuable in on-chain trading—and also the part I most look forward to.
Recently saw an interesting project that’s taking a direction toward interstellar digital civilization.
Its biggest feature, I think, is that the narrative is quite long-term—it’s not just focused on short-term hype, but is trying to build a decentralized ecosystem.
There’s a community and a team working together to drive it forward, and its future development is still worth keeping an eye on.
Aug 4 Crypto Market Analysis|Macro Sentiment Rebounds, but the Market Still Awaits a Real Breakout Overnight U.S. stocks continued to strengthen, and U.S. manufacturing data came in above expectations, causing a partial rebound in risk appetite. However, the crypto market has not seen a corresponding surge in volume. Bitcoin and Ethereum remain range-bound, suggesting capital is still cautious.
From the current market perspective, Bitcoin remains the barometer for the entire crypto market. After the recent pullback, $BTC is currently consolidating repeatedly around a key support zone, with neither bulls nor bears gaining a clear advantage for the moment. Although bearish momentum has weakened somewhat, sell-side pressure above still exists. In the short term, it looks more like the market is waiting for a new catalyst rather than immediately starting another trend cycle.
What has been most impacting the market recently is no longer the launch of a specific project or ETF-related news—it’s expectations for Federal Reserve policy. The market has begun to price in the U.S. CPI data scheduled for mid-August. If inflation continues to cool, expectations for a policy shift in September could strengthen, and risk assets may see a new round of repair. Conversely, if CPI comes in higher than expected again, discussions about keeping interest rates high for longer—or even resuming rate hikes—may heat up once more, which would continue to压 valuations across the entire crypto market.
In recent days, it has become clear that most altcoins have not followed BTC into an independent breakout. Capital remains concentrated in a small number of hot sectors. AI, RWA, and some high-heat MEMEs remain active, while projects lacking narrative support continue to see declining trading volume. This suggests that although risk appetite has recovered somewhat, the flow of funds remains highly selective, with no broad-based simultaneous rally.
Today, the market needs to watch two signals: Whether Bitcoin can reclaim and hold the recent pressure levels, and whether trading volume expands in tandem. Whether U.S. Treasury yields and the U.S. Dollar Index continue to strengthen. If the dollar keeps rebounding, risk assets may still face near-term pressure; if the dollar falls, it would be favorable for further restoration of crypto sentiment. Overall, the market is still in a range-bound, data-waiting phase. What truly determines the direction of the August trend may not be today’s price fluctuations, but rather the upcoming U.S. inflation data and the market’s recalibration of the Fed policy path.
Many people like to use TVL and trading volume to judge a protocol.
But I care more about another question:
If there’s no real money involved, will users still be willing to spend their time using it?
The HertzFlow testnet has been running for nearly five months. According to official data, it has cumulatively attracted about 117,000 users, completed around $3.7 billion in trading volume, and has a TVL of over $170 million.
Even though these figures come from the testnet, they are still built from real interactions one by one.
I’m quite aligned with the team’s positioning.
They don’t want to create a lofty financial concept. Instead, they aim to become a sufficiently convenient entry point for on-chain derivatives on BNB Chain.
Open your wallet, trade, then leave.
No need to spend half a day learning how to do a single operation, and no need to constantly switch back and forth through complex processes.
In many cases, what keeps users isn’t just features—it’s the cost of using the product.
In terms of product design, HertzFlow still focuses on trading.
With self-custody wallets, on-chain settlement, support for trading multiple asset types, and an open Permissionless Market that allows more markets to be created by the community rather than relying entirely on the platform.
All of these designs ultimately point to one goal: make trading more natural, not more complicated.
Of course, performing well on the testnet doesn’t guarantee success on the mainnet.
The real challenge comes after funds actually enter.
Whether liquidity is sufficient, whether risk controls are stable, and how the experience holds up under extreme market conditions—these still need the market to verify.
But at least for now, it seems HertzFlow hasn’t rushed to tell a grand story. Instead, it first gets the product running.
If the future mainnet can maintain this kind of experience, it’s worth continuing to watch.
Many people interpret a trading competition as nothing more than a ranking game.
But what I care about more is that it’s often also an important milestone right before an airdrop.
Recently, @Velvet_Capital launched a new perpetual trading competition with a total prize pool of 75 million Gems. It also lines up perfectly with the $VELVET airdrop coming on August 10.
This time, the rewards are split into two tracks.
One track is based on profit (PNL), rewarding the people who truly do trading well; the other is based on trading volume (Volume), which is better suited for active traders.
The two leaderboards are calculated independently—meaning you can focus on one or participate in both.
The leaderboards update every 5 minutes, and rankings can change at any time.
I think the timing is what’s most worth paying attention to.
The trading competition ends on August 9, and on August 10 it moves straight into the next airdrop phase, at which time 2.7 million $VELVET tokens will be distributed.
If you’re already trading on Velvet, during this period you can participate in the Gems ranking as well—so you’re also catching the final window before the airdrop.
Of course, the competition is still, ultimately, about trading.
Rewards are just extra incentives. You shouldn’t disrupt your own rhythm just to chase a high rank.
The people who are really suited to participate are those who are already trading in the first place. Follow your strategy—and if you can also get extra rewards, that’s a nice bonus.
Many projects in a bear market spend most of their time debating funding, runway, and narrative.
But right now, I’d rather look at a single metric first: are people willing to continuously pay for its product?
That’s also why I’ve been paying close attention to @renaissxyz lately.
Renaiss isn’t creating a new Meme track—it’s bringing physical collectibles onto the blockchain.
For rated collectibles like Pokémon and sports cards, liquidity can be unlocked through custody and on-chain attestation, enabling later trading, transfer, and even redemption.
It doesn’t solve the question of “whether there are assets,” but rather “how assets can circulate more efficiently.”
The official data previously disclosed really stood out to me.
Since the Beta launch, the platform’s cumulative revenue has already exceeded $20 million, registered users have surpassed 260,000, and the time it took to reach the second $10 million in revenue was clearly shorter than the first.
At the very least, that indicates one thing: real transaction demand is still growing.
More importantly, these numbers weren’t propped up by token-emission incentives.
As of now, Renaiss still hasn’t issued any tokens. Users stay mainly because of the collectibles, trading, and product experience—not because they want to mine or farm airdrops.
I’ve always felt that in a bear market, products are the easiest to validate.
When market sentiment fades, platforms that can truly generate revenue and retain users are often more worthy of long-term observation.
Whether Renaiss can go further still needs time to be proven.
But at least it has already demonstrated one thing: when a product genuinely meets market demand, there will still be people willing to keep using it—even without token incentives.
【Has Kaito officially started yet?】 I just realized this: the project Kaito said is “just getting started now” is Megapot, which has already moved into Kaito Studio.
The key isn’t only Megapot, though—it’s that Kaito Studio is connecting more and more projects. The more projects that come onboard, the more collaboration opportunities creators can take part in, and Kaito’s data and influence will grow along with it.
Of course, what everyone is most期待ing is Kaito Katalyst. Once Katalyst officially launches, the steadily increasing collaboration projects in the Studio will become the foundation that truly makes the whole system run. So Megapot is just one of the beginnings. Next, it’s worth keeping an eye on how many more projects Kaito can bring.
For now, let’s keep building creator influence—later on, we’ll most likely have to keep…
Many people think that making a product available in Chinese is just translating English.
But in a product like perpetual contracts, I actually feel that language is part of the trading experience.
A lot of people’s first encounter with leverage isn’t that they don’t know how to click buttons—it’s that they can’t understand the rules.
How is margin calculated? When will liquidation happen? What are the differences between different modes?
If you misunderstand any of these, the loss isn’t just time—it’s real funds.
So what the Simplified Chinese version truly lowers isn’t only the entry barrier to use, but the barrier to understanding.
Only by reading and understanding the rules can you know where the risks are, and only then can you decide whether this product is right for you.
Recently, I tried the Simplified Chinese version of @Hertzflow_xyz. Both Simplified and Traditional Chinese are already covered.
Core content—including self-custody trading, Hyper Leverage, up to 1000x leverage, multi-oracle pricing, and Real Yield—can all be understood directly in your native language, without having to translate while figuring things out.
At the very least, the step of learning the product’s mechanics will be much smoother.
Of course, changing the language doesn’t mean the risk changes.
The volatility and risks that leverage trading should have won’t be reduced at all.
But if it’s still on the testnet right now, I think that’s actually a pretty good stage.
Run through the mechanisms first, and understand how each feature works. Learning while trading after the mainnet goes live would be much less comfortable.