$PYTH Regarding this coin, as a suggestion from a veteran, the project members are arrogant and unwilling to share profits with coin holders. Before the establishment of DAO, there was a proposal to airdrop the income or tokens of the cooperative use agreement project to the coin holders according to a certain proportion, but it was rejected by one vote. At the time of staking, the staking rate was already 80% (staking accounts for liquidity). The project staff released information intensively and worked very actively, but the price has not performed well. Does this mean that the so-called market maker did not make a market at all? Refer to $TIA for comparison. Although the price has risen, it is still more of an increase achieved by SOL. After the coin price rose, it was obvious that the enthusiasm of the project staff decreased, and they were basically lying flat. Before unlocking, there were two airdrops, one to the community and one to the cooperative project party, but the specific data flow was not made public, and it was questioned by the community. The project party DAO existed in name only and was useless. This time, the large-scale unlocking was very early, and there was no explanation to the community. No matter what the reason, it exposed the dishonesty of the project party. Although the price has been pulled up, is this a deliberate smokescreen to let everyone digest the negative information of the huge unlocking and maintain a gambling mentality? I think the next step is the beginning of a negative decline! So I have already shorted it! $PYTH #山寨币热点