#starknet
starknet
969,096 views
2,445 Discussing
Hot
Latest
On whether Starknet should become an independent L1, I’m not looking at the vote result—I’m looking at the timeline after the vote.
First, the numbers: In the October 22 Snapshot vote, 93.52% of the voting power supported “researching” an independent, quantum-resistant L1. Only 4.57% voted No. There was about 489.3 million STRK in total voting power, with 3,236 votes. Note: research, not migration.
So what have I been seeing over the past two weeks? The exact same opening lines: “Who should control the timeline for blockchain security upgrades?” and “This isn’t just about becoming an L1.” Then the same thing posted again from another account. Thousands of views, with almost as many replies as likes—over 170 replies and around 200 likes on one post, and more than 70 replies and just over 60 likes on another. Is this what normal discussion looks like? It looks more like someone going down a task list and farming engagement.
My take is pretty straightforward: quantum resistance is a nice bit of packaging, but the real problem is that the L2 value-capture story has run out of steam. On Ethereum, you’re borrowing security and someone else owns the narrative. Become an L1 yourself, and the token finally has a reason to be treated as gas and a security budget. I understand that motivation, but let’s not make the “quantum threat” the main character. Quantum is a problem for years from now; token prices are a problem right now.
Besides, 3,236 votes and 93% in favor don’t prove community consensus in a token vote. They only show that people who disagree couldn’t be bothered to show up.
If you’re thinking of jumping in, ask one question first: If it really becomes independent, who will backstop the liquidity and bridges in the existing ecosystem? Until the research report comes out, don’t believe a word of these posts flooding your feed.
#Starknet #L2
On whether Starknet should become an independent L1, I’m not looking at the vote result—I’m looking at the timeline after the vote.
First, the numbers: In the October 22 Snapshot vote, 93.52% of the voting power supported “researching” an independent, quantum-resistant L1. Only 4.57% voted No. There was about 489.3 million STRK in total voting power, with 3,236 votes. Note: research, not migration.
So what have I been seeing over the past two weeks? The exact same opening lines: “Who should control the timeline for blockchain security upgrades?” and “This isn’t just about becoming an L1.” Then the same thing posted again from another account. Thousands of views, with almost as many replies as likes—over 170 replies and around 200 likes on one post, and more than 70 replies and just over 60 likes on another. Is this what normal discussion looks like? It looks more like someone going down a task list and farming engagement.
My take is pretty straightforward: quantum resistance is a nice bit of packaging, but the real problem is that the L2 value-capture story has run out of steam. On Ethereum, you’re borrowing security and someone else owns the narrative. Become an L1 yourself, and the token finally has a reason to be treated as gas and a security budget. I understand that motivation, but let’s not make the “quantum threat” the main character. Quantum is a problem for years from now; token prices are a problem right now.
Besides, 3,236 votes and 93% in favor don’t prove community consensus in a token vote. They only show that people who disagree couldn’t be bothered to show up.
If you’re thinking of jumping in, ask one question first: If it really becomes independent, who will backstop the liquidity and bridges in the existing ecosystem? Until the research report comes out, don’t believe a word of these posts flooding your feed.
#Starknet #L2
First, the numbers: In the October 22 Snapshot vote, 93.52% of the voting power supported “researching” an independent, quantum-resistant L1. Only 4.57% voted No. There was about 489.3 million STRK in total voting power, with 3,236 votes. Note: research, not migration.
So what have I been seeing over the past two weeks? The exact same opening lines: “Who should control the timeline for blockchain security upgrades?” and “This isn’t just about becoming an L1.” Then the same thing posted again from another account. Thousands of views, with almost as many replies as likes—over 170 replies and around 200 likes on one post, and more than 70 replies and just over 60 likes on another. Is this what normal discussion looks like? It looks more like someone going down a task list and farming engagement.
My take is pretty straightforward: quantum resistance is a nice bit of packaging, but the real problem is that the L2 value-capture story has run out of steam. On Ethereum, you’re borrowing security and someone else owns the narrative. Become an L1 yourself, and the token finally has a reason to be treated as gas and a security budget. I understand that motivation, but let’s not make the “quantum threat” the main character. Quantum is a problem for years from now; token prices are a problem right now.
Besides, 3,236 votes and 93% in favor don’t prove community consensus in a token vote. They only show that people who disagree couldn’t be bothered to show up.
If you’re thinking of jumping in, ask one question first: If it really becomes independent, who will backstop the liquidity and bridges in the existing ecosystem? Until the research report comes out, don’t believe a word of these posts flooding your feed.
#Starknet #L2
1
515
·
--
Starknet’s price action looks pretty grim: $STRK it’s down 57% over four weeks and is now trading sideways around $0.04.
Two developments are interesting when viewed together:
• Extended moved its settlement network to Arc
• In a non-binding community vote, 93.52% supported researching a Layer 1 option
One suggests an application in the ecosystem is moving elsewhere, while the other shows the project itself is considering a change of direction. The vote is non-binding, so it doesn’t mean they’ll definitely go ahead with it, but it does show the team recognizes the current path may need adjusting.
Coins that have lost half their value over four weeks often have one of two outcomes: they drift lower gradually, or a narrative comes along and lifts them back up. I don’t have a firm view yet; I’ll wait to see whether the L1 research leads to a concrete proposal.
#Starknet #L2
For reference only. This is not investment advice.
Starknet’s price action looks pretty grim: $STRK it’s down 57% over four weeks and is now trading sideways around $0.04.
Two developments are interesting when viewed together:
• Extended moved its settlement network to Arc
• In a non-binding community vote, 93.52% supported researching a Layer 1 option
One suggests an application in the ecosystem is moving elsewhere, while the other shows the project itself is considering a change of direction. The vote is non-binding, so it doesn’t mean they’ll definitely go ahead with it, but it does show the team recognizes the current path may need adjusting.
Coins that have lost half their value over four weeks often have one of two outcomes: they drift lower gradually, or a narrative comes along and lifts them back up. I don’t have a firm view yet; I’ll wait to see whether the L1 research leads to a concrete proposal.
#Starknet #L2
For reference only. This is not investment advice.
Two developments are interesting when viewed together:
• Extended moved its settlement network to Arc
• In a non-binding community vote, 93.52% supported researching a Layer 1 option
One suggests an application in the ecosystem is moving elsewhere, while the other shows the project itself is considering a change of direction. The vote is non-binding, so it doesn’t mean they’ll definitely go ahead with it, but it does show the team recognizes the current path may need adjusting.
Coins that have lost half their value over four weeks often have one of two outcomes: they drift lower gradually, or a narrative comes along and lifts them back up. I don’t have a firm view yet; I’ll wait to see whether the L1 research leads to a concrete proposal.
#Starknet #L2
For reference only. This is not investment advice.
46
·
--
$STRK printed $0.1265 on Oct 11. Tonight it's sitting at $0.0400 — roughly 68% lower, and right back where it traded in late September.
What the chart says:
• 24h: -2.1%, range $0.0398–$0.0425
• 7d range: $0.0384–$0.0452. That low (Nov 5) is the first line to watch; lose it on a daily close and the round-trip of the whole October rally gets uglier.
• Upside: $0.045 has capped every bounce this week, then the ~$0.047 area where price chopped in late October.
• Volume is the real tell: ~$2.3M today vs a ~$7.4M 20-day daily average. Sellers aren't dumping hard anymore, but buyers aren't showing up either.
Zooming out: Starknet is a ZK-rollup on Ethereum, and STRK is used for network fees and staking. The October move ran on huge volume (over $100M on Oct 11 alone), and that attention is now mostly gone. Low-volume bases near round numbers like $0.04 can resolve sharply in either direction, so this is a coin where position size matters more than conviction.
Are you waiting for a reclaim of $0.045, or watching to see if $0.0384 holds first?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Layer2 #CryptoTrading
$STRK printed $0.1265 on Oct 11. Tonight it's sitting at $0.0400 — roughly 68% lower, and right back where it traded in late September.
What the chart says:
• 24h: -2.1%, range $0.0398–$0.0425
• 7d range: $0.0384–$0.0452. That low (Nov 5) is the first line to watch; lose it on a daily close and the round-trip of the whole October rally gets uglier.
• Upside: $0.045 has capped every bounce this week, then the ~$0.047 area where price chopped in late October.
• Volume is the real tell: ~$2.3M today vs a ~$7.4M 20-day daily average. Sellers aren't dumping hard anymore, but buyers aren't showing up either.
Zooming out: Starknet is a ZK-rollup on Ethereum, and STRK is used for network fees and staking. The October move ran on huge volume (over $100M on Oct 11 alone), and that attention is now mostly gone. Low-volume bases near round numbers like $0.04 can resolve sharply in either direction, so this is a coin where position size matters more than conviction.
Are you waiting for a reclaim of $0.045, or watching to see if $0.0384 holds first?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Layer2 #CryptoTrading
What the chart says:
• 24h: -2.1%, range $0.0398–$0.0425
• 7d range: $0.0384–$0.0452. That low (Nov 5) is the first line to watch; lose it on a daily close and the round-trip of the whole October rally gets uglier.
• Upside: $0.045 has capped every bounce this week, then the ~$0.047 area where price chopped in late October.
• Volume is the real tell: ~$2.3M today vs a ~$7.4M 20-day daily average. Sellers aren't dumping hard anymore, but buyers aren't showing up either.
Zooming out: Starknet is a ZK-rollup on Ethereum, and STRK is used for network fees and staking. The October move ran on huge volume (over $100M on Oct 11 alone), and that attention is now mostly gone. Low-volume bases near round numbers like $0.04 can resolve sharply in either direction, so this is a coin where position size matters more than conviction.
Are you waiting for a reclaim of $0.045, or watching to see if $0.0384 holds first?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Layer2 #CryptoTrading
3
·
--
$$str$STRK – A Project to Watch! 🚀
Starknet is working to make Ethereum faster, more scalable, and efficient through Layer 2 technology.
💎 Strong technology
⚡ Ethereum scaling
🌐 Growing ecosystem
📈 Long-term potential
Stay patient, follow the development, and always do your own research.
#STRK #Starknet #Crypto $STRK
{spot}(STRKUSDT)
$$str$STRK – A Project to Watch! 🚀
Starknet is working to make Ethereum faster, more scalable, and efficient through Layer 2 technology.
💎 Strong technology
⚡ Ethereum scaling
🌐 Growing ecosystem
📈 Long-term potential
Stay patient, follow the development, and always do your own research.
#STRK #Starknet #Crypto $STRK
Starknet is working to make Ethereum faster, more scalable, and efficient through Layer 2 technology.
💎 Strong technology
⚡ Ethereum scaling
🌐 Growing ecosystem
📈 Long-term potential
Stay patient, follow the development, and always do your own research.
#STRK #Starknet #Crypto $STRK
1
477
Article
STARKs and Quantum Resistance: Why Did Starknet’s Technology Catch Google’s Attention?At the beginning of this year, a research paper on quantum computing published by Google brought an unexpected and significant validation to the crypto ecosystem. The paper highlighted Starknet’s hash-based STARK proofs as being considered structurally resistant to quantum attacks.
Here we have two cutting-edge labs working at the most complex technological frontiers of our era: Google, leading the race for quantum computing supremacy, and StarkWare (the developer of Starknet), solving Ethereum’s massive scalability bottleneck through ZK-Rollups. These are two fundamentally different mathematical and computational problems, yet they continue to converge on the same cutting-edge technology. STARKs keep showing up.
STARKs and Quantum Resistance: Why Did Starknet’s Technology Catch Google’s Attention?
At the beginning of this year, a research paper on quantum computing published by Google brought an unexpected and significant validation to the crypto ecosystem. The paper highlighted Starknet’s hash-based STARK proofs as being considered structurally resistant to quantum attacks.
Here we have two cutting-edge labs working at the most complex technological frontiers of our era: Google, leading the race for quantum computing supremacy, and StarkWare (the developer of Starknet), solving Ethereum’s massive scalability bottleneck through ZK-Rollups. These are two fundamentally different mathematical and computational problems, yet they continue to converge on the same cutting-edge technology. STARKs keep showing up.
Here we have two cutting-edge labs working at the most complex technological frontiers of our era: Google, leading the race for quantum computing supremacy, and StarkWare (the developer of Starknet), solving Ethereum’s massive scalability bottleneck through ZK-Rollups. These are two fundamentally different mathematical and computational problems, yet they continue to converge on the same cutting-edge technology. STARKs keep showing up.
119
·
--
【Market Update】Starknet v0.14.3 switches hash function to boost efficiency
StarkWare has released Starknet v0.14.3, replacing the Pedersen hash function with BLAKE2s-256 for better security and more efficient transactions. Accounts can migrate one at a time, without waiting for the entire network to switch signatures; the state tree and address derivation will be optimized later. Is this good or bad news for $STRK ? Share your thoughts in the comments.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #以太坊 #L2
(Source: Coinfomania)
⚠️Risk disclaimer: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please exercise caution.
【Market Update】Starknet v0.14.3 switches hash function to boost efficiency
StarkWare has released Starknet v0.14.3, replacing the Pedersen hash function with BLAKE2s-256 for better security and more efficient transactions. Accounts can migrate one at a time, without waiting for the entire network to switch signatures; the state tree and address derivation will be optimized later. Is this good or bad news for $STRK ? Share your thoughts in the comments.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #以太坊 #L2
(Source: Coinfomania)
⚠️Risk disclaimer: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please exercise caution.
StarkWare has released Starknet v0.14.3, replacing the Pedersen hash function with BLAKE2s-256 for better security and more efficient transactions. Accounts can migrate one at a time, without waiting for the entire network to switch signatures; the state tree and address derivation will be optimized later. Is this good or bad news for $STRK ? Share your thoughts in the comments.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #以太坊 #L2
(Source: Coinfomania)
⚠️Risk disclaimer: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please exercise caution.
14
·
--
$1,000 in $STRK on Oct 8 is worth $742 today. Three days in, that same bag was worth $2,216.
The math (Binance daily closes):
Oct 8 close: $0.05557 → $1,000 buys ~17,995 STRK
Oct 11 close: $0.12316 → ~$2,216 on paper
Now: $0.04124 → ~$742
One-week version: Oct 31 close $0.04421 → ~22,619 STRK → ~$933 today.
Small silver lining: STRK is +2.2% in the last 24h, the best daily print of the seven majors I track. 7-day range is $0.03844–$0.04608, so price is sitting in the middle of a tight box after a month-long bleed.
The real lesson isn't the -26%. It's that the +120% was there for a few days and most people never had a plan to lock any of it in.
So, honest question: if you were holding that bag at $2,216, would you have taken profit, or held for more? And at $742 now, hold or cut?
Low-cap alts like STRK can swing hard both ways. Size accordingly.
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #CryptoTrading #Altcoins
$1,000 in $STRK on Oct 8 is worth $742 today. Three days in, that same bag was worth $2,216.
The math (Binance daily closes):
Oct 8 close: $0.05557 → $1,000 buys ~17,995 STRK
Oct 11 close: $0.12316 → ~$2,216 on paper
Now: $0.04124 → ~$742
One-week version: Oct 31 close $0.04421 → ~22,619 STRK → ~$933 today.
Small silver lining: STRK is +2.2% in the last 24h, the best daily print of the seven majors I track. 7-day range is $0.03844–$0.04608, so price is sitting in the middle of a tight box after a month-long bleed.
The real lesson isn't the -26%. It's that the +120% was there for a few days and most people never had a plan to lock any of it in.
So, honest question: if you were holding that bag at $2,216, would you have taken profit, or held for more? And at $742 now, hold or cut?
Low-cap alts like STRK can swing hard both ways. Size accordingly.
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #CryptoTrading #Altcoins
The math (Binance daily closes):
Oct 8 close: $0.05557 → $1,000 buys ~17,995 STRK
Oct 11 close: $0.12316 → ~$2,216 on paper
Now: $0.04124 → ~$742
One-week version: Oct 31 close $0.04421 → ~22,619 STRK → ~$933 today.
Small silver lining: STRK is +2.2% in the last 24h, the best daily print of the seven majors I track. 7-day range is $0.03844–$0.04608, so price is sitting in the middle of a tight box after a month-long bleed.
The real lesson isn't the -26%. It's that the +120% was there for a few days and most people never had a plan to lock any of it in.
So, honest question: if you were holding that bag at $2,216, would you have taken profit, or held for more? And at $742 now, hold or cut?
Low-cap alts like STRK can swing hard both ways. Size accordingly.
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #CryptoTrading #Altcoins
9
·
--
$STRK is the top gainer of the majors I track today: +3.4% in 24h, now around $0.0417. Would you put $500 in at this level, or is it too late?
Context first. On Nov 5 it got knocked from roughly $0.043 to under $0.039 in a single hourly flush, and it's been grinding back up with higher lows ever since. 24h range: $0.04004 – $0.04249. Still -3.4% on the week, and the 7-day high sits at $0.04608.
The case for: steady recovery structure, beating BTC (+0.7%) and ETH (+0.7%) today, and price is still well below where it traded before the drop.
The case against: 24h volume is about $2.8M, under its ~$3.9M daily average for the prior 6 days. A bounce on thin volume can fade fast, and the $0.042–0.043 zone is where it broke down. Small cap, high volatility, size accordingly.
So: $500 in here, wait for a reclaim of $0.043, or skip it entirely?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoTrading
$STRK is the top gainer of the majors I track today: +3.4% in 24h, now around $0.0417. Would you put $500 in at this level, or is it too late?
Context first. On Nov 5 it got knocked from roughly $0.043 to under $0.039 in a single hourly flush, and it's been grinding back up with higher lows ever since. 24h range: $0.04004 – $0.04249. Still -3.4% on the week, and the 7-day high sits at $0.04608.
The case for: steady recovery structure, beating BTC (+0.7%) and ETH (+0.7%) today, and price is still well below where it traded before the drop.
The case against: 24h volume is about $2.8M, under its ~$3.9M daily average for the prior 6 days. A bounce on thin volume can fade fast, and the $0.042–0.043 zone is where it broke down. Small cap, high volatility, size accordingly.
So: $500 in here, wait for a reclaim of $0.043, or skip it entirely?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoTrading
Context first. On Nov 5 it got knocked from roughly $0.043 to under $0.039 in a single hourly flush, and it's been grinding back up with higher lows ever since. 24h range: $0.04004 – $0.04249. Still -3.4% on the week, and the 7-day high sits at $0.04608.
The case for: steady recovery structure, beating BTC (+0.7%) and ETH (+0.7%) today, and price is still well below where it traded before the drop.
The case against: 24h volume is about $2.8M, under its ~$3.9M daily average for the prior 6 days. A bounce on thin volume can fade fast, and the $0.042–0.043 zone is where it broke down. Small cap, high volatility, size accordingly.
So: $500 in here, wait for a reclaim of $0.043, or skip it entirely?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoTrading
14
·
--
$STRK has now given back its ENTIRE October rally.
The run that started near 0.043 on Oct 3 topped at 0.1265 on Oct 11. Today it trades around 0.0408, about 68% off that peak and below where the move began.
What fueled it was real news: on Oct 8 StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson said Starknet is actively considering becoming an independent Layer 1, and strkBTC incentives were drawing Bitcoin DeFi attention. Then came the Oct 15 unlock of roughly 127M STRK to early contributors and investors, and the bid never recovered. Speculation on a narrative is not the same as a shipped plan.
The chart now:
• 24h: +2.6%, range 0.0389 – 0.0419
• 7d: -7.9%, low 0.0384 (Nov 5), high 0.0461
• 24h volume ~$3.1M vs ~$5.5M daily average over the past two weeks. Interest has dried up.
0.0384 is the line. Lose it and STRK prints its lowest level since early October. Reclaim 0.046 and the downtrend from the peak finally gets questioned. Thin volume means either break can be sharp, and this is a high-volatility small cap, so size accordingly.
Is the L1 story priced out completely, or is this where patient money starts paying attention?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Altcoins
$STRK has now given back its ENTIRE October rally.
The run that started near 0.043 on Oct 3 topped at 0.1265 on Oct 11. Today it trades around 0.0408, about 68% off that peak and below where the move began.
What fueled it was real news: on Oct 8 StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson said Starknet is actively considering becoming an independent Layer 1, and strkBTC incentives were drawing Bitcoin DeFi attention. Then came the Oct 15 unlock of roughly 127M STRK to early contributors and investors, and the bid never recovered. Speculation on a narrative is not the same as a shipped plan.
The chart now:
• 24h: +2.6%, range 0.0389 – 0.0419
• 7d: -7.9%, low 0.0384 (Nov 5), high 0.0461
• 24h volume ~$3.1M vs ~$5.5M daily average over the past two weeks. Interest has dried up.
0.0384 is the line. Lose it and STRK prints its lowest level since early October. Reclaim 0.046 and the downtrend from the peak finally gets questioned. Thin volume means either break can be sharp, and this is a high-volatility small cap, so size accordingly.
Is the L1 story priced out completely, or is this where patient money starts paying attention?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Altcoins
The run that started near 0.043 on Oct 3 topped at 0.1265 on Oct 11. Today it trades around 0.0408, about 68% off that peak and below where the move began.
What fueled it was real news: on Oct 8 StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson said Starknet is actively considering becoming an independent Layer 1, and strkBTC incentives were drawing Bitcoin DeFi attention. Then came the Oct 15 unlock of roughly 127M STRK to early contributors and investors, and the bid never recovered. Speculation on a narrative is not the same as a shipped plan.
The chart now:
• 24h: +2.6%, range 0.0389 – 0.0419
• 7d: -7.9%, low 0.0384 (Nov 5), high 0.0461
• 24h volume ~$3.1M vs ~$5.5M daily average over the past two weeks. Interest has dried up.
0.0384 is the line. Lose it and STRK prints its lowest level since early October. Reclaim 0.046 and the downtrend from the peak finally gets questioned. Thin volume means either break can be sharp, and this is a high-volatility small cap, so size accordingly.
Is the L1 story priced out completely, or is this where patient money starts paying attention?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Altcoins
19
·
--
Article
STRK Ran 151% in 4 Days. Now It's Below Where It StartedFour weeks ago $STRK did +151% in four daily candles. Today it trades below the candle where that run started. If you're wondering what happened to the October L2 trade, the chart above tells most of the story.
The numbers (Binance spot, daily closes)
STRK closed Oct 7 at 0.04907 and Oct 11 at 0.12316. That's +151% in four days, on a single-day volume of about $104M, roughly 11x what it printed on Oct 7. It now sits near 0.0414, which is about 66% below the Oct 11 close and roughly 16% below Oct 7.
$ZK ran later and softer: from 0.01197 on Oct 7 to 0.01703 on Oct 15, about +42%. It's now around 0.00967, about 43% off that close and about 19% below its own Oct 7 level.
$ETH, the chain both of these settle to, never joined the party. It closed Oct 7 at 2,574 and is around 2,235 now, about -13%. Its latest bounce stalled too: a wick to 2,450 on Nov 4, then a close back at 2,238 the next day.
So all three are below the Oct 7 baseline, and the two L2 tokens are below it by more than ETH. Every bit of the October outperformance is gone.
Why round-trips like this happen
A move that size, on that much volume and with no follow-through from the base asset, is usually a liquidity event rather than a repricing. Volume is the tell. STRK's daily volume over the last two weeks has been about $2–9M, a small fraction of the $104M peak day. ZK's 24h volume is under $1M. The buyers who drove the spike haven't come back, and thin books cut both ways: they let a token run fast, and they let it bleed without much resistance.
It's also a useful reminder of the beta problem with L2 tokens. When the market is risk-on, they move like leveraged ETH. When ETH drifts lower, as it has for a month, they tend to drift lower faster.
The longer view isn't as ugly
Zoom out to 90 days and STRK is still up about 76% from its early-August close of 0.02345. Measured in ETH, STRK is about 62% below its Oct 11 peak ratio but still around 50% above where it was in early August. So October didn't come from nothing, but the spike priced in far more than the market was willing to hold.
Levels I'm watching on STRK
- Support: 0.0384–0.0398. Those are the Nov 5 and Oct 30 lows. Losing that zone on a daily close would put the rally fully in the rear-view.
- Resistance: 0.0455–0.0485. That's the late-October range ceiling, and above it sits 0.0495, where Oct 23 closed.
- Today it's up about 3.9% in 24h, with a range of 0.0389–0.0419, but on only about $3.4M of volume. Small green candles on thin volume don't prove much yet.
For ZK, the Nov 5 low near 0.0090 is the line in the sand. It's the lowest print since mid-September.
What would change the picture
1. ETH reclaiming the 2,400s and holding there. Nov 4 showed buyers can push it, but they couldn't keep it. L2 tokens rarely lead when ETH is weak.
2. Volume coming back to L2 tokens. A move on $20M+ days means something; a move on $3M days usually doesn't.
3. STRK/ETH stabilising. If the ratio stops making lower lows, rotation interest is returning.
Until then I'd treat L2 bounces as bounces, not trend changes. STRK and ZK are small, volatile and thinly traded right now. Size accordingly, and know where you're wrong before you get in.
Did you trade the October spike, or did you watch it from the sidelines? And what would get you back into L2 tokens: an ETH breakout, or a cheaper price?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Layer2 #CryptoAnalysis
STRK Ran 151% in 4 Days. Now It's Below Where It Started
Four weeks ago $STRK did +151% in four daily candles. Today it trades below the candle where that run started. If you're wondering what happened to the October L2 trade, the chart above tells most of the story.
The numbers (Binance spot, daily closes)
STRK closed Oct 7 at 0.04907 and Oct 11 at 0.12316. That's +151% in four days, on a single-day volume of about $104M, roughly 11x what it printed on Oct 7. It now sits near 0.0414, which is about 66% below the Oct 11 close and roughly 16% below Oct 7.
$ZK ran later and softer: from 0.01197 on Oct 7 to 0.01703 on Oct 15, about +42%. It's now around 0.00967, about 43% off that close and about 19% below its own Oct 7 level.
$ETH , the chain both of these settle to, never joined the party. It closed Oct 7 at 2,574 and is around 2,235 now, about -13%. Its latest bounce stalled too: a wick to 2,450 on Nov 4, then a close back at 2,238 the next day.
So all three are below the Oct 7 baseline, and the two L2 tokens are below it by more than ETH. Every bit of the October outperformance is gone.
Why round-trips like this happen
A move that size, on that much volume and with no follow-through from the base asset, is usually a liquidity event rather than a repricing. Volume is the tell. STRK's daily volume over the last two weeks has been about $2–9M, a small fraction of the $104M peak day. ZK's 24h volume is under $1M. The buyers who drove the spike haven't come back, and thin books cut both ways: they let a token run fast, and they let it bleed without much resistance.
It's also a useful reminder of the beta problem with L2 tokens. When the market is risk-on, they move like leveraged ETH. When ETH drifts lower, as it has for a month, they tend to drift lower faster.
The longer view isn't as ugly
Zoom out to 90 days and STRK is still up about 76% from its early-August close of 0.02345. Measured in ETH, STRK is about 62% below its Oct 11 peak ratio but still around 50% above where it was in early August. So October didn't come from nothing, but the spike priced in far more than the market was willing to hold.
Levels I'm watching on STRK
- Support: 0.0384–0.0398. Those are the Nov 5 and Oct 30 lows. Losing that zone on a daily close would put the rally fully in the rear-view.
- Resistance: 0.0455–0.0485. That's the late-October range ceiling, and above it sits 0.0495, where Oct 23 closed.
- Today it's up about 3.9% in 24h, with a range of 0.0389–0.0419, but on only about $3.4M of volume. Small green candles on thin volume don't prove much yet.
For ZK, the Nov 5 low near 0.0090 is the line in the sand. It's the lowest print since mid-September.
What would change the picture
1. ETH reclaiming the 2,400s and holding there. Nov 4 showed buyers can push it, but they couldn't keep it. L2 tokens rarely lead when ETH is weak.
2. Volume coming back to L2 tokens. A move on $20M+ days means something; a move on $3M days usually doesn't.
3. STRK/ETH stabilising. If the ratio stops making lower lows, rotation interest is returning.
Until then I'd treat L2 bounces as bounces, not trend changes. STRK and ZK are small, volatile and thinly traded right now. Size accordingly, and know where you're wrong before you get in.
Did you trade the October spike, or did you watch it from the sidelines? And what would get you back into L2 tokens: an ETH breakout, or a cheaper price?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Layer2 #CryptoAnalysis
The numbers (Binance spot, daily closes)
STRK closed Oct 7 at 0.04907 and Oct 11 at 0.12316. That's +151% in four days, on a single-day volume of about $104M, roughly 11x what it printed on Oct 7. It now sits near 0.0414, which is about 66% below the Oct 11 close and roughly 16% below Oct 7.
$ZK ran later and softer: from 0.01197 on Oct 7 to 0.01703 on Oct 15, about +42%. It's now around 0.00967, about 43% off that close and about 19% below its own Oct 7 level.
$ETH , the chain both of these settle to, never joined the party. It closed Oct 7 at 2,574 and is around 2,235 now, about -13%. Its latest bounce stalled too: a wick to 2,450 on Nov 4, then a close back at 2,238 the next day.
So all three are below the Oct 7 baseline, and the two L2 tokens are below it by more than ETH. Every bit of the October outperformance is gone.
Why round-trips like this happen
A move that size, on that much volume and with no follow-through from the base asset, is usually a liquidity event rather than a repricing. Volume is the tell. STRK's daily volume over the last two weeks has been about $2–9M, a small fraction of the $104M peak day. ZK's 24h volume is under $1M. The buyers who drove the spike haven't come back, and thin books cut both ways: they let a token run fast, and they let it bleed without much resistance.
It's also a useful reminder of the beta problem with L2 tokens. When the market is risk-on, they move like leveraged ETH. When ETH drifts lower, as it has for a month, they tend to drift lower faster.
The longer view isn't as ugly
Zoom out to 90 days and STRK is still up about 76% from its early-August close of 0.02345. Measured in ETH, STRK is about 62% below its Oct 11 peak ratio but still around 50% above where it was in early August. So October didn't come from nothing, but the spike priced in far more than the market was willing to hold.
Levels I'm watching on STRK
- Support: 0.0384–0.0398. Those are the Nov 5 and Oct 30 lows. Losing that zone on a daily close would put the rally fully in the rear-view.
- Resistance: 0.0455–0.0485. That's the late-October range ceiling, and above it sits 0.0495, where Oct 23 closed.
- Today it's up about 3.9% in 24h, with a range of 0.0389–0.0419, but on only about $3.4M of volume. Small green candles on thin volume don't prove much yet.
For ZK, the Nov 5 low near 0.0090 is the line in the sand. It's the lowest print since mid-September.
What would change the picture
1. ETH reclaiming the 2,400s and holding there. Nov 4 showed buyers can push it, but they couldn't keep it. L2 tokens rarely lead when ETH is weak.
2. Volume coming back to L2 tokens. A move on $20M+ days means something; a move on $3M days usually doesn't.
3. STRK/ETH stabilising. If the ratio stops making lower lows, rotation interest is returning.
Until then I'd treat L2 bounces as bounces, not trend changes. STRK and ZK are small, volatile and thinly traded right now. Size accordingly, and know where you're wrong before you get in.
Did you trade the October spike, or did you watch it from the sidelines? And what would get you back into L2 tokens: an ETH breakout, or a cheaper price?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Layer2 #CryptoAnalysis
12
·
--
$STRK just wicked to $0.03844, its lowest print in 30 days, while $BTC slipped "only" 4.9%.
The numbers right now:
• Price $0.03976, -8.45% in 24h
• 24h range $0.03844 – $0.04468
• -6.3% over 7 days, -23% over 30 days
• 24h volume about $5.2M, in line with its recent daily range
The chart tells a simple story. For a week STRK chopped between roughly $0.040 and $0.046, then lost the floor in one heavy 4h candle as BTC dropped from above $80K toward $76K. The selling candle carried one of the biggest 4h volume bars of the week, so this wasn't just thin air.
Levels I'm watching: $0.0384 is the line in the sand. A daily close back above $0.042 would turn this into a fake breakdown; losing $0.038 opens fresh lows for the month.
Project angle: supply is a recurring headwind. Under StarkWare's revised schedule (reported by The Block), about 127M STRK unlock on the 15th of every month through March 2027. The next one is November 15, ten days out, and the token has often been soft around these dates.
High beta, thin liquidity, unlock overhang: size small if you play it.
Bounce from the 30-day low, or one more leg down before the 15th?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoTrading
$STRK just wicked to $0.03844, its lowest print in 30 days, while $BTC slipped "only" 4.9%.
The numbers right now:
• Price $0.03976, -8.45% in 24h
• 24h range $0.03844 – $0.04468
• -6.3% over 7 days, -23% over 30 days
• 24h volume about $5.2M, in line with its recent daily range
The chart tells a simple story. For a week STRK chopped between roughly $0.040 and $0.046, then lost the floor in one heavy 4h candle as BTC dropped from above $80K toward $76K. The selling candle carried one of the biggest 4h volume bars of the week, so this wasn't just thin air.
Levels I'm watching: $0.0384 is the line in the sand. A daily close back above $0.042 would turn this into a fake breakdown; losing $0.038 opens fresh lows for the month.
Project angle: supply is a recurring headwind. Under StarkWare's revised schedule (reported by The Block), about 127M STRK unlock on the 15th of every month through March 2027. The next one is November 15, ten days out, and the token has often been soft around these dates.
High beta, thin liquidity, unlock overhang: size small if you play it.
Bounce from the 30-day low, or one more leg down before the 15th?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoTrading
The numbers right now:
• Price $0.03976, -8.45% in 24h
• 24h range $0.03844 – $0.04468
• -6.3% over 7 days, -23% over 30 days
• 24h volume about $5.2M, in line with its recent daily range
The chart tells a simple story. For a week STRK chopped between roughly $0.040 and $0.046, then lost the floor in one heavy 4h candle as BTC dropped from above $80K toward $76K. The selling candle carried one of the biggest 4h volume bars of the week, so this wasn't just thin air.
Levels I'm watching: $0.0384 is the line in the sand. A daily close back above $0.042 would turn this into a fake breakdown; losing $0.038 opens fresh lows for the month.
Project angle: supply is a recurring headwind. Under StarkWare's revised schedule (reported by The Block), about 127M STRK unlock on the 15th of every month through March 2027. The next one is November 15, ten days out, and the token has often been soft around these dates.
High beta, thin liquidity, unlock overhang: size small if you play it.
Bounce from the 30-day low, or one more leg down before the 15th?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoTrading
9
·
--
🚀 $STRK – Starknet: A Project to Watch!
Starknet continues to build its Layer 2 ecosystem with a focus on scalability, privacy, and advanced blockchain technology.
📊 The market is showing mixed signals, but long-term development remains worth watching.
🔥 My focus is on network growth, ecosystem adoption, and future opportunities.
Patience and research are key in crypto!
💎 Stay focused. Stay strong.
#STRK #Starknet #Crypto #Binance #blockchain $STRK
{spot}(STRKUSDT)
🚀 $STRK – Starknet: A Project to Watch!
Starknet continues to build its Layer 2 ecosystem with a focus on scalability, privacy, and advanced blockchain technology.
📊 The market is showing mixed signals, but long-term development remains worth watching.
🔥 My focus is on network growth, ecosystem adoption, and future opportunities.
Patience and research are key in crypto!
💎 Stay focused. Stay strong.
#STRK #Starknet #Crypto #Binance #blockchain $STRK
Starknet continues to build its Layer 2 ecosystem with a focus on scalability, privacy, and advanced blockchain technology.
📊 The market is showing mixed signals, but long-term development remains worth watching.
🔥 My focus is on network growth, ecosystem adoption, and future opportunities.
Patience and research are key in crypto!
💎 Stay focused. Stay strong.
#STRK #Starknet #Crypto #Binance #blockchain $STRK
4
1.2k
·
--
$STRK just dropped 9.8% in two hours, and the volume says it wasn't a quiet slide.
From the 14:00 UTC open at 0.04328 it fell to a low of 0.03844 before settling near 0.0390. The 15:00 UTC candle alone printed about 7.4x the average hourly volume of the past day. That's down 11.2% over 24h.
It didn't happen alone. In the same window $BTC slid from roughly 79,660 to a 75,568 low and $ETH lost 2,300, hitting 2,236. Broad risk-off hour: STRK just fell harder, as small caps usually do.
What I'm watching: does STRK reclaim the 0.042 area it broke from, or does 0.0384 get retested once the dust settles? Thin-cap coins can whip both ways after a flush like this, so size accordingly.
Are you buying this dip, waiting for BTC to stabilize first, or staying out?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #CryptoMarket #Altcoins
$STRK just dropped 9.8% in two hours, and the volume says it wasn't a quiet slide.
From the 14:00 UTC open at 0.04328 it fell to a low of 0.03844 before settling near 0.0390. The 15:00 UTC candle alone printed about 7.4x the average hourly volume of the past day. That's down 11.2% over 24h.
It didn't happen alone. In the same window $BTC slid from roughly 79,660 to a 75,568 low and $ETH lost 2,300, hitting 2,236. Broad risk-off hour: STRK just fell harder, as small caps usually do.
What I'm watching: does STRK reclaim the 0.042 area it broke from, or does 0.0384 get retested once the dust settles? Thin-cap coins can whip both ways after a flush like this, so size accordingly.
Are you buying this dip, waiting for BTC to stabilize first, or staying out?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #CryptoMarket #Altcoins
From the 14:00 UTC open at 0.04328 it fell to a low of 0.03844 before settling near 0.0390. The 15:00 UTC candle alone printed about 7.4x the average hourly volume of the past day. That's down 11.2% over 24h.
It didn't happen alone. In the same window $BTC slid from roughly 79,660 to a 75,568 low and $ETH lost 2,300, hitting 2,236. Broad risk-off hour: STRK just fell harder, as small caps usually do.
What I'm watching: does STRK reclaim the 0.042 area it broke from, or does 0.0384 get retested once the dust settles? Thin-cap coins can whip both ways after a flush like this, so size accordingly.
Are you buying this dip, waiting for BTC to stabilize first, or staying out?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #CryptoMarket #Altcoins
7
·
--
$STRK went from $0.1265 to $0.0435 in 24 days. Nobody's talking about it anymore, and that may be the interesting part.
The price action:
• 24h: +2.6%, range $0.0410–$0.0449
• 7d: -7.5%, with a weekly low of $0.0398
• Down ~66% from the Oct 11 high
• Daily volume has shrunk from $103.8M on the peak day to about $4.7M over the last 24h
Candles have gone from huge red bodies to tiny ones sitting on $0.040–$0.044. That's what exhaustion looks like, though it isn't the same as a bottom. A clean daily close back above $0.048 would be the first sign buyers are returning. Losing $0.040 opens fresh lows.
The ecosystem angle: in October a non-binding Starknet governance poll backed researching a move to an independent, quantum-resistant L1 (about 93.5% of voting power in favor, research only, not a migration). StarkWare says a draft whitepaper is due this month, and on Nov 2 it demoed a wallet migrating to post-quantum signatures on Sepolia testnet.
So the narrative is still active while the chart is dead quiet. Does the whitepaper wake STRK up, or is it already a "sell the news" setup?
Small-cap, very volatile, size accordingly.
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Crypto
$STRK went from $0.1265 to $0.0435 in 24 days. Nobody's talking about it anymore, and that may be the interesting part.
The price action:
• 24h: +2.6%, range $0.0410–$0.0449
• 7d: -7.5%, with a weekly low of $0.0398
• Down ~66% from the Oct 11 high
• Daily volume has shrunk from $103.8M on the peak day to about $4.7M over the last 24h
Candles have gone from huge red bodies to tiny ones sitting on $0.040–$0.044. That's what exhaustion looks like, though it isn't the same as a bottom. A clean daily close back above $0.048 would be the first sign buyers are returning. Losing $0.040 opens fresh lows.
The ecosystem angle: in October a non-binding Starknet governance poll backed researching a move to an independent, quantum-resistant L1 (about 93.5% of voting power in favor, research only, not a migration). StarkWare says a draft whitepaper is due this month, and on Nov 2 it demoed a wallet migrating to post-quantum signatures on Sepolia testnet.
So the narrative is still active while the chart is dead quiet. Does the whitepaper wake STRK up, or is it already a "sell the news" setup?
Small-cap, very volatile, size accordingly.
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Crypto
The price action:
• 24h: +2.6%, range $0.0410–$0.0449
• 7d: -7.5%, with a weekly low of $0.0398
• Down ~66% from the Oct 11 high
• Daily volume has shrunk from $103.8M on the peak day to about $4.7M over the last 24h
Candles have gone from huge red bodies to tiny ones sitting on $0.040–$0.044. That's what exhaustion looks like, though it isn't the same as a bottom. A clean daily close back above $0.048 would be the first sign buyers are returning. Losing $0.040 opens fresh lows.
The ecosystem angle: in October a non-binding Starknet governance poll backed researching a move to an independent, quantum-resistant L1 (about 93.5% of voting power in favor, research only, not a migration). StarkWare says a draft whitepaper is due this month, and on Nov 2 it demoed a wallet migrating to post-quantum signatures on Sepolia testnet.
So the narrative is still active while the chart is dead quiet. Does the whitepaper wake STRK up, or is it already a "sell the news" setup?
Small-cap, very volatile, size accordingly.
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Crypto
47
·
--
The whole market had a polite little green day. $STRK showed up with a rocket 🚀
24h on Binance spot: BNB +0.6%, SOL +0.8%, BTC +1.7%, ETH +2.3%, HYPE +2.6%... and STRK +6.3% to $0.0438, after tagging $0.0452 at the high.
Plot twist: it's still about 7% below where it closed a week ago. So is this the start of a comeback arc, or just a very dramatic stretch before going back to sleep? 😅
Small caps move fast in both directions, so size accordingly.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoMemes
The whole market had a polite little green day. $STRK showed up with a rocket 🚀
24h on Binance spot: BNB +0.6%, SOL +0.8%, BTC +1.7%, ETH +2.3%, HYPE +2.6%... and STRK +6.3% to $0.0438, after tagging $0.0452 at the high.
Plot twist: it's still about 7% below where it closed a week ago. So is this the start of a comeback arc, or just a very dramatic stretch before going back to sleep? 😅
Small caps move fast in both directions, so size accordingly.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoMemes
24h on Binance spot: BNB +0.6%, SOL +0.8%, BTC +1.7%, ETH +2.3%, HYPE +2.6%... and STRK +6.3% to $0.0438, after tagging $0.0452 at the high.
Plot twist: it's still about 7% below where it closed a week ago. So is this the start of a comeback arc, or just a very dramatic stretch before going back to sleep? 😅
Small caps move fast in both directions, so size accordingly.
#Starknet #STRK #CryptoMemes
6
·
--
$STRK is up 7.8% in 24h, the best move of the majors I track today. Would you put $500 in at 0.0436, or is it too late?
Quick context from the 1h chart: price bounced off ~0.0402 (the 24h low and basically the weekly floor), spiked to 0.0452, faded, and is now grinding back up. 24h volume is about $6.7M vs a ~$4.7M daily average over the prior six days, so there's real participation behind it.
Case for buying: the 0.040 area held twice this week, and buyers stepped in on volume, not on fumes.
Case for waiting: STRK is still down ~6.7% on the week and well below the 0.048 highs from Oct 28. The first pop to 0.045 got sold quickly, so that's the level to reclaim before calling it a trend change. Small cap, high volatility, size accordingly.
Buy here, wait for 0.045, or skip it entirely? Tell me below 👇
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Altcoins #CryptoTrading
$STRK is up 7.8% in 24h, the best move of the majors I track today. Would you put $500 in at 0.0436, or is it too late?
Quick context from the 1h chart: price bounced off ~0.0402 (the 24h low and basically the weekly floor), spiked to 0.0452, faded, and is now grinding back up. 24h volume is about $6.7M vs a ~$4.7M daily average over the prior six days, so there's real participation behind it.
Case for buying: the 0.040 area held twice this week, and buyers stepped in on volume, not on fumes.
Case for waiting: STRK is still down ~6.7% on the week and well below the 0.048 highs from Oct 28. The first pop to 0.045 got sold quickly, so that's the level to reclaim before calling it a trend change. Small cap, high volatility, size accordingly.
Buy here, wait for 0.045, or skip it entirely? Tell me below 👇
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Altcoins #CryptoTrading
Quick context from the 1h chart: price bounced off ~0.0402 (the 24h low and basically the weekly floor), spiked to 0.0452, faded, and is now grinding back up. 24h volume is about $6.7M vs a ~$4.7M daily average over the prior six days, so there's real participation behind it.
Case for buying: the 0.040 area held twice this week, and buyers stepped in on volume, not on fumes.
Case for waiting: STRK is still down ~6.7% on the week and well below the 0.048 highs from Oct 28. The first pop to 0.045 got sold quickly, so that's the level to reclaim before calling it a trend change. Small cap, high volatility, size accordingly.
Buy here, wait for 0.045, or skip it entirely? Tell me below 👇
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Altcoins #CryptoTrading
19
·
--
$STRK ripped 9.6% in a single hour today on ~6.5x its average volume. By evening it had handed back most of it.
The tape (Binance spot, 1h):
• 11:00 UTC candle: 0.04124 → high 0.04519, about $1.34M traded vs a 7d hourly average near $207K
• Now 0.04239: still +4.2% on 24h, but -8.7% over 7 days
• Since the high, a slow bleed with shrinking volume, which reads more like a squeeze fading than fresh buyers stepping in
Levels I'm watching:
• 0.0452: today's spike high, the line bulls need to reclaim
• 0.0400–0.0398: the round number plus the 7d low from Oct 30. Lose that and the range breaks down
The bigger story is still the L1 question. In October, a non-binding Snapshot vote passed with 93.5% of voting power in favor of researching a move from Ethereum L2 to an independent, post-quantum L1. Reports say StarkWare plans a draft whitepaper this month, and any actual switch would need separate governance votes. STRK topped near $0.1265 on Oct 11 during that hype and now sits roughly 66% lower.
So the whitepaper is a real catalyst, but this is a high-volatility, low-liquidity coin. Size accordingly.
What gets you interested here: a reclaim of 0.045, or a retest of 0.040?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Altcoins
$STRK ripped 9.6% in a single hour today on ~6.5x its average volume. By evening it had handed back most of it.
The tape (Binance spot, 1h):
• 11:00 UTC candle: 0.04124 → high 0.04519, about $1.34M traded vs a 7d hourly average near $207K
• Now 0.04239: still +4.2% on 24h, but -8.7% over 7 days
• Since the high, a slow bleed with shrinking volume, which reads more like a squeeze fading than fresh buyers stepping in
Levels I'm watching:
• 0.0452: today's spike high, the line bulls need to reclaim
• 0.0400–0.0398: the round number plus the 7d low from Oct 30. Lose that and the range breaks down
The bigger story is still the L1 question. In October, a non-binding Snapshot vote passed with 93.5% of voting power in favor of researching a move from Ethereum L2 to an independent, post-quantum L1. Reports say StarkWare plans a draft whitepaper this month, and any actual switch would need separate governance votes. STRK topped near $0.1265 on Oct 11 during that hype and now sits roughly 66% lower.
So the whitepaper is a real catalyst, but this is a high-volatility, low-liquidity coin. Size accordingly.
What gets you interested here: a reclaim of 0.045, or a retest of 0.040?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Altcoins
The tape (Binance spot, 1h):
• 11:00 UTC candle: 0.04124 → high 0.04519, about $1.34M traded vs a 7d hourly average near $207K
• Now 0.04239: still +4.2% on 24h, but -8.7% over 7 days
• Since the high, a slow bleed with shrinking volume, which reads more like a squeeze fading than fresh buyers stepping in
Levels I'm watching:
• 0.0452: today's spike high, the line bulls need to reclaim
• 0.0400–0.0398: the round number plus the 7d low from Oct 30. Lose that and the range breaks down
The bigger story is still the L1 question. In October, a non-binding Snapshot vote passed with 93.5% of voting power in favor of researching a move from Ethereum L2 to an independent, post-quantum L1. Reports say StarkWare plans a draft whitepaper this month, and any actual switch would need separate governance votes. STRK topped near $0.1265 on Oct 11 during that hype and now sits roughly 66% lower.
So the whitepaper is a real catalyst, but this is a high-volatility, low-liquidity coin. Size accordingly.
What gets you interested here: a reclaim of 0.045, or a retest of 0.040?
Not financial advice.
#Starknet #STRK #Altcoins
17
·
--
$STRK is back on the trending list overnight, and this time the price is actually cooperating — up about 3.9% near $0.0425 on roughly $49M in volume. That is a different feel from the last time it trended, when it was sliding while everyone watched. $BTC is steadier in the background, up around 0.8% near $77,690, so this looks like its own bounce rather than the market lifting everything. I am watching whether $STRK holds above $0.042 — if it does, the trending attention probably sticks around a bit longer. #Starknet
$STRK is back on the trending list overnight, and this time the price is actually cooperating — up about 3.9% near $0.0425 on roughly $49M in volume. That is a different feel from the last time it trended, when it was sliding while everyone watched. $BTC is steadier in the background, up around 0.8% near $77,690, so this looks like its own bounce rather than the market lifting everything. I am watching whether $STRK holds above $0.042 — if it does, the trending attention probably sticks around a bit longer. #Starknet
1
·
--
$STRK bounced 4.4% in 24h. Would you put $500 in at 0.0425, or is it already too late?
Quick context from the chart:
• Bottomed near 0.0400, spiked to 0.0452, now giving back part of it
• Still down 8.7% on the week, 7d range 0.0398 – 0.0485
• 24h volume ~$5.6M vs ~$4.9M daily average over the prior 6 days
Case for buying: the 7-day low held, volume came in on the bounce, and price is still near the bottom of the weekly range, so the risk to the low is small.
Case for waiting: the spike already faded about 6% from its high, the weekly trend is still lower highs, and small caps like this can swing 10% in a session without warning.
What's your call: $500 in now, wait for a retest of 0.040, or skip it?
Not financial advice.
#STRK #Starknet #Altcoins
$STRK bounced 4.4% in 24h. Would you put $500 in at 0.0425, or is it already too late?
Quick context from the chart:
• Bottomed near 0.0400, spiked to 0.0452, now giving back part of it
• Still down 8.7% on the week, 7d range 0.0398 – 0.0485
• 24h volume ~$5.6M vs ~$4.9M daily average over the prior 6 days
Case for buying: the 7-day low held, volume came in on the bounce, and price is still near the bottom of the weekly range, so the risk to the low is small.
Case for waiting: the spike already faded about 6% from its high, the weekly trend is still lower highs, and small caps like this can swing 10% in a session without warning.
What's your call: $500 in now, wait for a retest of 0.040, or skip it?
Not financial advice.
#STRK #Starknet #Altcoins
Quick context from the chart:
• Bottomed near 0.0400, spiked to 0.0452, now giving back part of it
• Still down 8.7% on the week, 7d range 0.0398 – 0.0485
• 24h volume ~$5.6M vs ~$4.9M daily average over the prior 6 days
Case for buying: the 7-day low held, volume came in on the bounce, and price is still near the bottom of the weekly range, so the risk to the low is small.
Case for waiting: the spike already faded about 6% from its high, the weekly trend is still lower highs, and small caps like this can swing 10% in a session without warning.
What's your call: $500 in now, wait for a retest of 0.040, or skip it?
Not financial advice.
#STRK #Starknet #Altcoins
29
The whole market is falling, but $STRK is bucking the trend and pushing higher: around $0.043 today, up about 5% in 24 hours, putting it among the top gainers out of 200 coins. If you had put in 10,000 U yesterday, it would be worth about 10,500 U today. Don’t dismiss that 5% as insignificant—in a market where BTC has fallen below 77,000 and ZEC is down 10% in a day, few coins are managing to stay in the green. But let’s not get carried away: STRK is still down about 15% over the past 30 days and about 5% over the past 7 days. Whether today’s bullish candle is just an oversold bounce or a genuine reversal is clear to see on Binance’s 30-day candlestick chart. Don’t chase the rally or go all in—the key is whether the rebound can hold above $0.045. #Starknet
The whole market is falling, but $STRK is bucking the trend and pushing higher: around $0.043 today, up about 5% in 24 hours, putting it among the top gainers out of 200 coins. If you had put in 10,000 U yesterday, it would be worth about 10,500 U today. Don’t dismiss that 5% as insignificant—in a market where BTC has fallen below 77,000 and ZEC is down 10% in a day, few coins are managing to stay in the green. But let’s not get carried away: STRK is still down about 15% over the past 30 days and about 5% over the past 7 days. Whether today’s bullish candle is just an oversold bounce or a genuine reversal is clear to see on Binance’s 30-day candlestick chart. Don’t chase the rally or go all in—the key is whether the rebound can hold above $0.045. #Starknet
212
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
1
#JobsReportRaisesHikeOdds
547,591 views
3,470 Discussing
2
#CPITestsDecemberRateOutlook
168,608 views
1,210 Discussing
3
#US Data Center Rules May Constrain AI Expansion
76,400 views
230 Discussing
4
#ARKPlans14ThematicETFsCoveringAIAndTokenizedMarkets
4,637 views
71 Discussing
5
#WillAnthropicListOnTime
167,572 views
1,430 Discussing
6
#WillUS-IranTensionsBoostSafe-HavenDemand?
78,420 views
562 Discussing
7
#BitcoinETFsSee$412MNetOutflows
16,597 views
78 Discussing
8
#HKSFCPlansToRestrictCryptoAndExchangeTerms
65,731 views
584 Discussing
9
#TradFiForBeginners
97,434 views
1,040 Discussing
10
#FinCENAndFedWithdraw$250CryptoTransferProposal
10,649 views
18 Discussing