starknet

The whole market is falling, but $STRK is bucking the trend and pushing higher: around $0.043 today, up about 5% in 24 hours, putting it among the top gainers out of 200 coins. If you had put in 10,000 U yesterday, it would be worth about 10,500 U today. Don’t dismiss that 5% as insignificant—in a market where BTC has fallen below 77,000 and ZEC is down 10% in a day, few coins are managing to stay in the green. But let’s not get carried away: STRK is still down about 15% over the past 30 days and about 5% over the past 7 days. Whether today’s bullish candle is just an oversold bounce or a genuine reversal is clear to see on Binance’s 30-day candlestick chart. Don’t chase the rally or go all in—the key is whether the rebound can hold above $0.045. #Starknet

$STRK has now erased almost its ENTIRE October pump.

Peak on Oct 11: $0.1265. Right now: $0.04124. That's roughly -67% from the top, and price is sitting about where the run started in late September.

What the tape says:
• 24h: -1.5%, range $0.04002–$0.04208
• 7 days: down from $0.0457, with a low at $0.03982
• Volume: ~$2.0M in the last 24h vs ~$104M on the peak day. The crowd has left the building.

Context: the October rally was fuelled by talk of Starknet expanding beyond its role as an Ethereum L2, plus the strkBTC / Bitcoin liquidity push, and then ran straight into a mid-October token unlock. The narrative didn't vanish, but the speculative money clearly did.

Levels I'm watching: $0.040 is the line. Lose it on a daily close and the weekly low near $0.0398 is the last floor in sight. Reclaim $0.046 (where it chopped Oct 25–28) and the bleed at least pauses.

Low volume at a full round-trip can mean exhaustion, or just apathy. STRK is volatile and supply-heavy, so size accordingly.

Is this quiet accumulation or a slow fade?

Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Layer2 #CryptoTrading

$STRK is back on the trending list overnight, and this time the price is actually cooperating — up about 3.9% near $0.0425 on roughly $49M in volume. That is a different feel from the last time it trended, when it was sliding while everyone watched. $BTC is steadier in the background, up around 0.8% near $77,690, so this looks like its own bounce rather than the market lifting everything. I am watching whether $STRK holds above $0.042 — if it does, the trending attention probably sticks around a bit longer. #Starknet

$STRK ripped 9.6% in a single hour today on ~6.5x its average volume. By evening it had handed back most of it.

The tape (Binance spot, 1h):
• 11:00 UTC candle: 0.04124 → high 0.04519, about $1.34M traded vs a 7d hourly average near $207K
• Now 0.04239: still +4.2% on 24h, but -8.7% over 7 days
• Since the high, a slow bleed with shrinking volume, which reads more like a squeeze fading than fresh buyers stepping in

Levels I'm watching:
• 0.0452: today's spike high, the line bulls need to reclaim
• 0.0400–0.0398: the round number plus the 7d low from Oct 30. Lose that and the range breaks down

The bigger story is still the L1 question. In October, a non-binding Snapshot vote passed with 93.5% of voting power in favor of researching a move from Ethereum L2 to an independent, post-quantum L1. Reports say StarkWare plans a draft whitepaper this month, and any actual switch would need separate governance votes. STRK topped near $0.1265 on Oct 11 during that hype and now sits roughly 66% lower.

So the whitepaper is a real catalyst, but this is a high-volatility, low-liquidity coin. Size accordingly.

What gets you interested here: a reclaim of 0.045, or a retest of 0.040?

Not financial advice.

#Starknet #STRK #Altcoins

$STRK bounced 4.4% in 24h. Would you put $500 in at 0.0425, or is it already too late?

Quick context from the chart:
• Bottomed near 0.0400, spiked to 0.0452, now giving back part of it
• Still down 8.7% on the week, 7d range 0.0398 – 0.0485
• 24h volume ~$5.6M vs ~$4.9M daily average over the prior 6 days

Case for buying: the 7-day low held, volume came in on the bounce, and price is still near the bottom of the weekly range, so the risk to the low is small.

Case for waiting: the spike already faded about 6% from its high, the weekly trend is still lower highs, and small caps like this can swing 10% in a session without warning.

What's your call: $500 in now, wait for a retest of 0.040, or skip it?

Not financial advice.

#STRK #Starknet #Altcoins

😮 $STRK STARKNET SURPRISE: RISING ALONE WHILE LAYER 2s LAG

South Korea asked its biggest banks to measure how a major crypto hack could affect them. To me, when an entire country has its banks run that exercise, the market separates the serious players from the rest—and today, the serious Layer 2 play is STRK, which is rising on its own.

Look at the detail nobody is seeing:
→ South Korea asked its biggest banks to calculate the impact of a major crypto hack, according to CoinDesk.
→ STRK +4.7% with $43.2M, rising much more than $ZK (0.0%) and $OP (-1.4%) among Layer 2s: it’s breaking away from the pack.
→ Entry $0.0428775–$0.04334, SL $0.0426, TP1 $0.04518 (+4.8%) → TP2 $0.046589 (+8.1%).

Do you see STRK breaking $0.04659 today or pulling back to $0.0426? 👇

$STRK $ZK $OP

#Starknet #Capa2 #Trading

$STRK chose violence against its own chart today: -5.2% in 24h, but politely. One step at a time. 🪜

No elevator, no panic jump. Just a slow walk down from 0.0439 to 0.0405, pausing on almost every landing like it forgot why it came downstairs.

At least it's getting its steps in. 😅

Honest question: is this the staircase to a basement, or is the bottom floor close? What's your read?

#STRK #Starknet #CryptoMemes

$STRK is down 68% from its October high, and the crowd has quietly left the room.

On Oct 11 it printed 0.1265 on roughly $104M of daily spot volume. Today it sits at 0.0406 (-5.5% in 24h, range 0.0403–0.0439) with about $2.2M traded so far. Down 14% on the week.

Levels I'm watching:
• 0.0398, the Oct 28 low. Price is only ~2% above it. Lose that on a daily close and the September base near 0.029–0.031 is the next real reference.
• 0.0439–0.0450, today's high and the area it chopped in all of last week. Reclaiming it would be the first sign sellers are tired.

The project angle: the October pump came on StarkWare's proposal to research turning Starknet into its own quantum-resistant L1. The non-binding governance poll closed Oct 22 with 93.52% backing further research, but that's research only, not a migration. CEO Eli Ben-Sasson said a draft whitepaper is expected in November, and any actual move needs a separate binding vote. That paper is the next catalyst on the calendar.

Thin volume near support cuts both ways: small flows can push it hard in either direction. Size small if you touch this one.

Does the 0.0398 floor hold, or is a retest of the September base coming first?

Not financial advice.

#Starknet #Layer2 #CryptoAnalysis

$STRK is down 7.3% in 24h. $HYPE is down 6.2%. Only one of them can bounce first.

Whole board is red this morning: BTC -2.2% near 76,900, ETH -2.4%, SOL -3.6%. But the two small caps took the hardest hit, and they arrive here from opposite directions.

STRK sits around 0.0405, lost 12.4% over 7 days and is printing near its 24h low (0.0403). Stretched, or still sliding?
HYPE is at 83.2, still +7.1% on the week even after dropping from 89.1. Healthy pullback, or the start of giving back the run?

Quick poll, reply with a letter:
A) STRK bounces first
B) HYPE bounces first
C) Neither, $BTC has to hold 76.5K before alts move
D) More downside for both

Both are high-volatility names, so size accordingly.

Not financial advice.
#Starknet #Hyperliquid #CryptoPoll

$STRK just showed up on the trending board again, and it's not a pretty look — down about 4.4% near $0.041 on roughly $25M in volume, sliding a bit harder than $BTC , which is down around 1.6% near $76,700. Feels like the trending attention is meeting real selling rather than fresh buying for once. I'm watching whether $STRK holds above $0.04 — if it does, a bounce attempt wouldn't surprise me; lose it and the crowd probably moves on fast. Are you watching that level too? #Starknet

$STRK said "no elevator for me" and took the stairs down instead 🪜

48 hours of 1h candles: 0.0446 → 0.0411, about -7.8%, and today's -5.1% is the worst of the big 7 I track. Every little bounce just turned into a landing before the next step down.

At least it's getting its cardio in 😅

Real question: is this a staircase you'd sit on and wait, or are you waiting for it to find the ground floor first?

#STRK #Starknet #CryptoMeme

🚨 $STRK LAYER 2 SHOWDOWN: THE ONE SUFFERING MOST WITH BTC BELOW $77,000

This afternoon, BTC fell below $77,000, and more than $100M in longs were liquidated in an hour. To me, on days like this, not all layer 2s fall equally: the market punishes the one that was already looking weak first, and today, that's STRK.

Look at the detail nobody is noticing:
→ STRK -4.6% with $25.4M in volume, while $OP -2.1% and ZK -1.1% are down less among the layer 2s.
→ STRK is trading at $0.0409, a hair's breadth from its 24-hour low of $0.0403, with no bounce while BTC fails to recover $77,000.
→ Entry $0.04091–$0.04117, SL $0.04133, TP1 $0.03988 (-2.8%) → TP2 $0.03935 (-4.1%).

Will STRK lose $0.03935 or defend $0.03988? 👇

$STRK $OP ZK

#Starknet #Capa2 #Crypto

That 93.52% for Starknet has been spun by a bunch of accounts over the past two weeks into “L2 is moving to L1” and “a new post-quantum narrative.” I can’t help but laugh.

Let’s get the facts straight: what ended on October 22 was a non-binding vote on whether to “research” an independent post-quantum L1, not whether to “migrate.” If they really want to leave Ethereum, they’ll need to hold another vote. The white paper draft isn’t due until November. In plain English, nothing has been decided yet.

Now, about that 93.52%. That’s the share of voting power, not the number of people. Around 3,236 votes were recorded. With governance-token voting, voting power naturally concentrates in the hands of whales and team-related addresses. Make of that what you will when it comes to how much this percentage says about “community consensus.”

Now look at the market. One person tracked STRK falling from a high of around 0.123 in October to about 0.047—a drop of more than 60%. The same person’s data showed Starknet DeFi TVL falling from around $158 million on October 21 to about $41 million, while Extended also moved to Arc. The ecosystem is moving out, while the official line is about quantum computers.

The funniest part is the replies: a whole row of “93.52% is huge” and “makes the move seem real,” with single-digit view counts and exactly the same phrasing. Using this kind of engagement as evidence of hype is no different from fake orders.

I’m not saying post-quantum security isn’t important. STARK proofs, which are hash-based, really do have a stronger case than the elliptic-curve approach. But there’s a huge gap between “let’s research it” and “it’s worth buying.” Wait for the white paper, wait for the second vote, and wait for TVL to stop falling before talking up the narrative. Anyone rushing in now is probably just providing an exit for people who need to sell.

#Starknet #STRK

Will quantum computing wipe out all current on-chain signatures in one fell swoop? This topic has been heating up again lately. Starknet is pretty interesting: accounts themselves are smart contracts, so signature schemes can be upgraded without moving addresses or history; STARK proofs take a hash-based approach, making them more resilient to quantum threats; and it’s also pushing post-quantum signatures like Falcon-512, while bringing verification costs down. Quantum isn’t just around the corner, but the idea of “changing the locks without moving house” is a lot more practical than empty claims of quantum resistance. #Starknet #STRK #CryptoSecurity

$STRK just gave back its ENTIRE October rally. To the cent.

Oct 2 close: $0.04297. Now: $0.04298. In between, a run to $0.1265 on Oct 11 (+194% in 9 days) and a 66% slide from that top.

What the chart says today:
• 24h: -2.9%, range $0.04245–0.04451
• 7-day: -4.8%, low $0.03982 (Oct 30), high $0.04845 (Oct 28)
• 24h volume ~$2.2M vs $104M on Oct 11 peak day

That volume collapse is the real story. Sellers aren't panicking anymore, but buyers aren't showing up either. Sunday liquidity explains part of it, not all of it. Meanwhile BTC is flat (+0.4% 24h), so this isn't a market-wide flush.

Levels I'm watching: $0.0398 (this week's low) as the floor, and $0.0485 as the ceiling that has capped every daily high since Oct 25.

Ecosystem side: StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation reported cutting the gas cost of verifying Falcon-512 post-quantum signatures by about 46% (Oct 29), the kind of long-game research that rarely moves price in the short run. On the supply side, the monthly 127M STRK unlock lands again on Nov 15, worth keeping on the calendar.

Low-volume bases can break either way, and STRK has shown how fast it moves in both directions. Size accordingly.

Base building here, or just a pause before the next leg down?

Not financial advice.

#Starknet #Altcoins #CryptoTrading

📰 8.6 BTC from Troves: access to an old contract was not revoked

At 08:25 UTC on October 31, around 8.6 BTC was withdrawn from the xWBTC/WBTC vault on Starknet. According to Troves, the attacker exploited an old rebalancing contract that had been left with access rights after it was replaced.

The team revoked those rights and paused three vaults: xWBTC/WBTC, xSTRK/STRK, and xstrkBTC/strkBTC. Troves offered a reward of 1 WBTC for returning the remaining funds by November 3 at 23:59 UTC; the project has not yet reported whether the funds have been returned.

#WBTC #Starknet

🔥 $STRK — Starknet Update

Starknet is working toward a stronger blockchain future! 🚀

⚡ Zero-Knowledge technology
🌐 Ethereum scaling ecosystem
🔐 Exploring post-quantum security
💎 Long-term development potential

STRK is worth watching, but market volatility and ecosystem security risks remain important.

Keep learning, stay patient, and trade smart!

#STRK #Starknet #Crypto $STRK

$STRK just round-tripped its ENTIRE October pump.

Early October it closed near $0.043. By Oct 11 it tagged $0.1265. Today it sits at $0.0443, about 65% below that high and basically back where the run started.

What the tape says right now:
• 24h: +0.1%, range $0.0428 – $0.0461. Dead flat.
• 7d low: $0.0398 (Oct 30). That's the line bulls have to hold.
• Volume: ~$3.1M in 24h vs ~$104M on the Oct 11 peak day. The crowd has left.

The project side hasn't gone quiet, though. This week StarkWare rolled out Shadow Accounts, built on the STRK20 privacy framework, letting DeFi users keep positions separate from their main wallet. And the team said earlier this month it's considering a move toward running as its own L1, which was a big part of the October hype.

So the question is whether fundamentals catch up with a chart that has fully deflated. Shrinking volume at the lows can mean sellers are exhausted, or simply that nobody cares yet. A clean reclaim of ~$0.046 with volume would say more than any headline. Losing $0.0398 opens fresh lows for the month.

STRK is a high-beta, low-liquidity coin. Size accordingly.

Accumulation zone or dead cat waiting to happen?

Not financial advice.

#Starknet #STRK #Altcoins

The yield strategy platform Troves on Starknet lost about 8.6 units of $BTC from one vault on October 31, not because of a new vulnerability, but because an old version of the asset rebalancing contract that had already been replaced still retained operating permissions.

Afterward, the team revoked the contract’s permissions and proactively paused the three vaults xWBTC/WBTC, xSTRK/STRK, and xstrkBTC/strkBTC, saying no actual losses had been found in other vaults so far. At the same time, they reached out to the attacker on-chain, offering a white-hat bounty of 1 unit of $WBTC in exchange for returning the remaining funds.

A loss of 8.6 BTC is not huge, but incidents like this are the easiest to overlook and the easiest to prevent in advance: when replacing a contract, whether the old permissions were truly cut off. A detailed postmortem report and a plan for handling affected depositors have not yet been released, and that is what these people are really waiting for.

#DeFi安全 #Starknet

The Starknet you imagine:
Quickly freezes the 428 $STRK transferred by the hacker, saving Binance from a $19 loss;

The actual Starknet:
19.5 million $STRK were transferred out of Binance’s hot wallet by a hacker, who successfully swapped them for 331 ETH.

Even if we give it the benefit of the doubt, the liquidity for these $STRK is on Ethereum mainnet, not Starknet L2. Even if Starknet wanted to freeze it, it couldn’t.

#STARKNET $STRK