Binance Square
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds

bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds

True News
·
--
BREAKING: Bitget Hacker BLOCKED! Security Win! 🛡️ Bitget’s $388M hacker FAILED to move stolen funds today Sep 29! Hacker tried to launder 100 SOL via Chainflip, but broker rejected deposit — message: “Deposit rejected by broker.” Funds returned to hack wallet, zero movement. Earlier, $NEAR Intents blocked $50M laundering attempt! Only $166K slipped, $503K frozen during execution. NEAR even waived bounty to help Bitget. Good news: Bitget restored $BTC withdrawals Sep 28, 08:00 UTC. CEO Gracy Chen says user funds are SAFU. Crypto security is getting stronger. Is Bitget now safest exchange? Comment below! 👇 #Bitget #BitgetHack #Chainflip $NEAR #CryptoSecurity#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
BREAKING: Bitget Hacker BLOCKED! Security Win! 🛡️

Bitget’s $388M hacker FAILED to move stolen funds today Sep 29!

Hacker tried to launder 100 SOL via Chainflip, but broker rejected deposit — message: “Deposit rejected by broker.” Funds returned to hack wallet, zero movement.

Earlier, $NEAR Intents blocked $50M laundering attempt! Only $166K slipped, $503K frozen during execution. NEAR even waived bounty to help Bitget.

Good news: Bitget restored $BTC withdrawals Sep 28, 08:00 UTC. CEO Gracy Chen says user funds are SAFU.
Crypto security is getting stronger. Is Bitget now safest exchange? Comment below! 👇
#Bitget #BitgetHack #Chainflip $NEAR #CryptoSecurity#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds BITGET HACKER STOLE $388M… THEN HIT A WALL! 🧱👀 Nearly $388M was moved to attacker-controlled addresses after the Bitget security incident. But now something very different is happening… The hacker is trying to move the stolen funds — and the crypto infrastructure is starting to push back. 👀 One recent attempt involving roughly 100 SOL through Chainflip was rejected by the broker, sending the funds back to the originating wallet. And that may be the part traders are missing. The story is no longer simply: Hack → Stolen Funds → Hacker Runs It’s becoming: Stolen Funds → On-chain Tracking → Detection → Blocks & Rejections Bitget says the incident affected approximately $387.5M, while its investigation and recovery efforts continue. The exchange has also begun restoring withdrawals in phases after containing the incident. But here’s the bigger question: Can stolen crypto actually be moved freely once the entire ecosystem is watching the wallets? 👀 That’s where things get interesting. The hacker may control the wallets… But moving the money is a completely different problem. Every swap, bridge, deposit and transfer can create another trace. And if more platforms begin rejecting or freezing suspicious flows, the value of those stolen assets could become increasingly difficult to realize. So the real story may not be the $388M that was stolen. It may be what happens to those funds after everyone starts watching. 🔥 $388M stolen. 🔒 Some movement attempts blocked. 👀 The wallets are being watched. So what happens next? Can the hacker actually move the remaining funds… or has the crypto ecosystem already built a wall around them? 🧱 $BTC {spot}(BTCUSDT) $SOL {spot}(SOLUSDT) $BNB {spot}(BNBUSDT) #Bitget #BitgetHac #CryptoSecurity #Blockchain
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
BITGET HACKER STOLE $388M… THEN HIT A WALL! 🧱👀
Nearly $388M was moved to attacker-controlled addresses after the Bitget security incident.
But now something very different is happening…
The hacker is trying to move the stolen funds — and the crypto infrastructure is starting to push back. 👀
One recent attempt involving roughly 100 SOL through Chainflip was rejected by the broker, sending the funds back to the originating wallet.
And that may be the part traders are missing.
The story is no longer simply:
Hack → Stolen Funds → Hacker Runs
It’s becoming:
Stolen Funds → On-chain Tracking → Detection → Blocks & Rejections
Bitget says the incident affected approximately $387.5M, while its investigation and recovery efforts continue. The exchange has also begun restoring withdrawals in phases after containing the incident.
But here’s the bigger question:
Can stolen crypto actually be moved freely once the entire ecosystem is watching the wallets? 👀
That’s where things get interesting.
The hacker may control the wallets…
But moving the money is a completely different problem.
Every swap, bridge, deposit and transfer can create another trace.
And if more platforms begin rejecting or freezing suspicious flows, the value of those stolen assets could become increasingly difficult to realize.
So the real story may not be the $388M that was stolen.
It may be what happens to those funds after everyone starts watching.
🔥 $388M stolen.
🔒 Some movement attempts blocked.
👀 The wallets are being watched.
So what happens next?
Can the hacker actually move the remaining funds… or has the crypto ecosystem already built a wall around them? 🧱
$BTC
$SOL
$BNB
#Bitget #BitgetHac #CryptoSecurity #Blockchain
ik1x:
880123071 My dream is $100,000—please
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds 🎭 The “hacker” Bitget was just rejected by a smart contract! 🛑😂 So, #bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds . Did the hacker totally fail, folks? Not exactly, but he suffered a funny loss! 📉 The exploiter tried to launder the stolen loot through Chainflip, but the intermediaries looked at the “dirty” crypto and said: "Rejected!" ❌ Deposits were rejected and returned immediately. No funds are officially frozen yet, but the hacker is currently stuck, holding a very heavy and highly traceable bag! 🛍️🎒 🛒 What should traders do? 👀 Follow the chain’s leftovers: Track the hacker’s address via MistTrack; any sudden movement will confuse the market. 🛡️ Stay calm: the security team is actively disabling the hacker’s exits. DYOR! This is absolutely not financial advice. Please follow up $BTC $BNB $XRP #Bitget #CryptoSecurity #Chainflip #OnChain #BinanceSquare
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
🎭 The “hacker” Bitget was just rejected by a smart contract! 🛑😂
So, #bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds . Did the hacker totally fail, folks? Not exactly, but he suffered a funny loss! 📉 The exploiter tried to launder the stolen loot through Chainflip, but the intermediaries looked at the “dirty” crypto and said: "Rejected!" ❌ Deposits were rejected and returned immediately.
No funds are officially frozen yet, but the hacker is currently stuck, holding a very heavy and highly traceable bag! 🛍️🎒
🛒 What should traders do?
👀 Follow the chain’s leftovers: Track the hacker’s address via MistTrack; any sudden movement will confuse the market.
🛡️ Stay calm: the security team is actively disabling the hacker’s exits.
DYOR! This is absolutely not financial advice.

Please follow up

$BTC
$BNB
$XRP
#Bitget #CryptoSecurity #Chainflip #OnChain #BinanceSquare
·
--
Bullish
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds 🚨 BITGET HACKER CAN’T MOVE THE STOLEN FUNDS! 👀 The attacker behind the reported Bitget exploit is reportedly struggling to move the stolen assets, as attempts to transfer or launder the funds face increasing on-chain monitoring. 🕵️‍♂️ 🔒 Stolen funds remain under close watch 👀 Blockchain activity is being tracked ⚠️ Attempts to move the assets could trigger further alerts 🌐 On-chain transparency is making it harder to disappear Crypto hacks can move fast… But blockchains remember everything. 👁️ The hacker may have stolen the funds. Moving them is another story. 💀 #Bitge t #CryptoSecurity #crypto $BTC
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
🚨 BITGET HACKER CAN’T MOVE THE STOLEN FUNDS! 👀
The attacker behind the reported Bitget exploit is reportedly struggling to move the stolen assets, as attempts to transfer or launder the funds face increasing on-chain monitoring. 🕵️‍♂️
🔒 Stolen funds remain under close watch
👀 Blockchain activity is being tracked
⚠️ Attempts to move the assets could trigger further alerts
🌐 On-chain transparency is making it harder to disappear
Crypto hacks can move fast…
But blockchains remember everything. 👁️
The hacker may have stolen the funds.
Moving them is another story. 💀
#Bitge t #CryptoSecurity #crypto $BTC
·
--
Bullish
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds 🎭 Bitget hacker just got REJECTED by a smart contract! 🛑😂 So, #bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds. Did the hacker completely fail, guys? Not entirely, but they just took a hilarious L! 📉 The exploiter tried to launder the stolen loot through Chainflip, but the brokers looked at the dirty crypto and said: "Access Denied!" ❌ The deposits were rejected and sent right back. No funds are officially frozen yet, but the hacker is currently stuck holding a very heavy, very traceable bag! 🛍️🎒 🛒 What should traders do? 👀 Follow the on-chain crumbs: Keep tracking the hacker's address via MistTrack; any sudden movement will shake the market. 🛡️ Stay calm: Security teams are actively bricking the hacker's exit routes. DYOR! This is absolutely NOT financial advice. 🚀 Support your boy! Sign up with code VINHTOCDO or use this link: [https://www.binance.com/register?ref=VINHTOCDO](https://www.binance.com/register?ref=VINHTOCDO) 👇 Click to trade below and support me: $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT) $BNB {future}(BNBUSDT) $XRP {future}(XRPUSDT) #Bitget #CryptoSecurity #Chainflip #VINHTOCDO #OnChain #BinanceSquare
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
🎭 Bitget hacker just got REJECTED by a smart contract! 🛑😂
So, #bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds. Did the hacker completely fail, guys? Not entirely, but they just took a hilarious L! 📉 The exploiter tried to launder the stolen loot through Chainflip, but the brokers looked at the dirty crypto and said: "Access Denied!" ❌ The deposits were rejected and sent right back. No funds are officially frozen yet, but the hacker is currently stuck holding a very heavy, very traceable bag! 🛍️🎒
🛒 What should traders do?
👀 Follow the on-chain crumbs: Keep tracking the hacker's address via MistTrack; any sudden movement will shake the market.
🛡️ Stay calm: Security teams are actively bricking the hacker's exit routes.
DYOR! This is absolutely NOT financial advice.
🚀 Support your boy! Sign up with code VINHTOCDO or use this link: https://www.binance.com/register?ref=VINHTOCDO
👇 Click to trade below and support me:
$BTC
$BNB
$XRP
#Bitget #CryptoSecurity #Chainflip #VINHTOCDO #OnChain #BinanceSquare
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds NEAR blocked attempts to transfer more than $50 million stolen in the Bitget hack and froze another $503,000. NEAR Intents says its compliance and security systems blocked attempts to transfer more than $50 million in stolen assets to Bitget, while approximately another $503,000 that had entered its infrastructure was later frozen. The intervention came after the September 24 attack on Bitget, which, according to estimates by the exchange platform, affected assets worth $387.5 million across multiple blockchain networks. NEAR Intents reported that, after the security breach, the attacker-associated addresses attempted to route the stolen funds through its cross-chain liquidity infrastructure. Its automated detection systems identified and rejected transactions totaling more than $50 million before the assets could enter Intents' liquidity network. $NVDAB {spot}(NVDABUSDT) $NVDA.US {stock_us}(NVDA.US)
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds

NEAR blocked attempts to transfer more than $50 million stolen in the Bitget hack and froze another $503,000.

NEAR Intents says its compliance and security systems blocked attempts to transfer more than $50 million in stolen assets to Bitget, while approximately another $503,000 that had entered its infrastructure was later frozen.

The intervention came after the September 24 attack on Bitget, which, according to estimates by the exchange platform, affected assets worth $387.5 million across multiple blockchain networks.

NEAR Intents reported that, after the security breach, the attacker-associated addresses attempted to route the stolen funds through its cross-chain liquidity infrastructure. Its automated detection systems identified and rejected transactions totaling more than $50 million before the assets could enter Intents' liquidity network.
$NVDAB
$NVDA.US
·
--
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds 🛡️ Bitget hacker’s latest attempt to move stolen funds was reportedly blocked. On September 29, the attacker behind the $388M Bitget hack reportedly attempted to launder 100 SOL through Chainflip, but the deposit was rejected and the funds were returned to the hacker’s wallet. Earlier, $NEAR Intents also blocked a reported $50M laundering attempt. While $166K reportedly slipped through, $503K was frozen during execution, with NEAR waiving its bounty to support Bitget. Bitget has also restored $BTC withdrawals as of September 28, with CEO Gracy Chen stating that user funds are SAFU. These developments show how transaction monitoring and cross-platform coordination can help disrupt attempts to move stolen assets. $NEAR {spot}(NEARUSDT) #Bitget #Near #CryptoSecurity #blockchain
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
🛡️ Bitget hacker’s latest attempt to move stolen funds was reportedly blocked.
On September 29, the attacker behind the $388M Bitget hack reportedly attempted to launder 100 SOL through Chainflip, but the deposit was rejected and the funds were returned to the hacker’s wallet.

Earlier, $NEAR Intents also blocked a reported $50M laundering attempt. While $166K reportedly slipped through, $503K was frozen during execution, with NEAR waiving its bounty to support Bitget.
Bitget has also restored $BTC withdrawals as of September 28, with CEO Gracy Chen stating that user funds are SAFU.

These developments show how transaction monitoring and cross-platform coordination can help disrupt attempts to move stolen assets.
$NEAR
#Bitget #Near #CryptoSecurity #blockchain
·
--
Bullish
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds 🔒 On-Chain Traps Pay Off! Bitget Exploit Funds Frozen as Hackers Hit a Dead End 📰Cross-Chain Traps Triggered: On-chain security protocols and cross-chain platforms (including NEAR Intents and Chainflip brokers) actively blocked and rejected attempts to route tens of millions in stolen crypto. Real-Time Surveillance: Security teams and exchange networks tagged the exploiter's wallet addresses across EVM, Tron, and XRP ledgers, leaving the hacker virtually boxed in. Cashing Out Impossible: Blacklists and liquidity protocol blocks mean the attacker cannot off-ramp or swap funds without triggering automated freezes. User Protection Engaged: Bitget confirmed user account balances are fully protected by its dedicated User Protection Fund while operations resume normally. 🚀The era of effortless crypto hacks is rapidly coming to an end as modern on-chain defense systems prove their strength. Following the recent Bitget security breach, the exploiter quickly discovered that stealing assets is one thing, but laundering them through today's connected blockchain ecosystem is nearly impossible. 1. Collaborative Industry Blacklisting 🛑 Minutes after the exploit was flagged, security analytics firms and protocols mapped out the hacker’s multi-chain web of addresses. Centralized stablecoin issuers and cross-chain liquidity bridges acted rapidly to block bridging and swap attempts, freezing funds directly at entry brokers. $XRP {future}(XRPUSDT) 2. The Liquidity Trap 🕸️ Every time the attacker attempts to convert stolen funds into un-trackable assets via decentralized protocols, automated compliance frameworks reject the transactions. The stolen assets remain "hot" and completely un-liquidatable, turning tens of millions into useless digital paperweights. $ZEC {future}(ZECUSDT) 🎯 Transparent ledger tracking and real-time cross-chain compliance are closing the doors on cybercriminals. #EarningsSeason #BitMineETHHoldingsTop6Million #CryptoNews
#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
🔒 On-Chain Traps Pay Off! Bitget Exploit Funds Frozen as Hackers Hit a Dead End

📰Cross-Chain Traps Triggered: On-chain security protocols and cross-chain platforms (including NEAR Intents and Chainflip brokers) actively blocked and rejected attempts to route tens of millions in stolen crypto.

Real-Time Surveillance: Security teams and exchange networks tagged the exploiter's wallet addresses across EVM, Tron, and XRP ledgers, leaving the hacker virtually boxed in.

Cashing Out Impossible: Blacklists and liquidity protocol blocks mean the attacker cannot off-ramp or swap funds without triggering automated freezes.

User Protection Engaged: Bitget confirmed user account balances are fully protected by its dedicated User Protection Fund while operations resume normally.

🚀The era of effortless crypto hacks is rapidly coming to an end as modern on-chain defense systems prove their strength. Following the recent Bitget security breach, the exploiter quickly discovered that stealing assets is one thing, but laundering them through today's connected blockchain ecosystem is nearly impossible.

1. Collaborative Industry Blacklisting 🛑
Minutes after the exploit was flagged, security analytics firms and protocols mapped out the hacker’s multi-chain web of addresses. Centralized stablecoin issuers and cross-chain liquidity bridges acted rapidly to block bridging and swap attempts, freezing funds directly at entry brokers.
$XRP
2. The Liquidity Trap 🕸️
Every time the attacker attempts to convert stolen funds into un-trackable assets via decentralized protocols, automated compliance frameworks reject the transactions. The stolen assets remain "hot" and completely un-liquidatable, turning tens of millions into useless digital paperweights.
$ZEC
🎯
Transparent ledger tracking and real-time cross-chain compliance are closing the doors on cybercriminals.

#EarningsSeason #BitMineETHHoldingsTop6Million #CryptoNews
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds Bitget hacker is still struggling to move the stolen funds 👀 Almost a week after the ~$387M drain from Bitget’s hot & warm wallets, a big chunk of the $ETH is just sitting there. One wallet alone still holds 10,000 $ETH that hasn’t moved at all. Some stablecoins already got frozen by Tether and Circle, and on-chain trackers are all over the rest. The attacker has swapped parts into $BTC and bridged a bit, but the big piles are still stuck and highly visible. Meanwhile Bitget’s protection fund is covering users and withdrawals are gradually reopening. Another reminder that stealing is one thing… actually cashing out clean is getting harder every year. #Bitget #CryptoHack #Blockchain #Security {spot}(BTCUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT)
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds
Bitget hacker is still struggling to move the stolen funds 👀
Almost a week after the ~$387M drain from Bitget’s hot & warm wallets, a big chunk of the $ETH is just sitting there. One wallet alone still holds 10,000 $ETH that hasn’t moved at all.

Some stablecoins already got frozen by Tether and Circle, and on-chain trackers are all over the rest. The attacker has swapped parts into $BTC and bridged a bit, but the big piles are still stuck and highly visible.

Meanwhile Bitget’s protection fund is covering users and withdrawals are gradually reopening.
Another reminder that stealing is one thing… actually cashing out clean is getting harder every year.

#Bitget #CryptoHack #Blockchain #Security
🚨 BREAKING: Bitget Faces $463M Outflows After Security Hack Following a major security hack where over $350 million was stolen, Bitget experienced massive user withdrawals, with total outflows reaching $463 million within just 24 hours. Stay safe and always protect your funds!
🚨 BREAKING: Bitget Faces $463M Outflows After Security Hack

Following a major security hack where over $350 million was stolen, Bitget experienced massive user withdrawals, with total outflows reaching $463 million within just 24 hours.

Stay safe and always protect your funds!
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds 🚨 Bitget Hacker Hits Cross-Chain Roadblock 💰 The Bitget breach was initially estimated at $351.6M, with later reports putting the stolen funds closer to $387M. 🔄 The attacker reportedly converted around 2,390 ETH into ~75 BTC through THORChain. 🛑 Another cross-chain route reportedly blocked around $50M linked to the attacker, slowing the movement of some stolen funds. ⚠️ But this does not mean the funds were fully frozen or recovered. Other assets reportedly continued moving across networks. 🌐 The takeaway: Blocking one route can slow fund movement, but cross-chain laundering remains difficult to stop completely. 👀 Can cross-chain protocols do more to block stolen crypto? #Bitget #CryptoHack #THORChain #CryptoSecurity
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds
🚨 Bitget Hacker Hits Cross-Chain Roadblock

💰 The Bitget breach was initially estimated at $351.6M, with later reports putting the stolen funds closer to $387M.

🔄 The attacker reportedly converted around 2,390 ETH into ~75 BTC through THORChain.

🛑 Another cross-chain route reportedly blocked around $50M linked to the attacker, slowing the movement of some stolen funds.

⚠️ But this does not mean the funds were fully frozen or recovered. Other assets reportedly continued moving across networks.

🌐 The takeaway: Blocking one route can slow fund movement, but cross-chain laundering remains difficult to stop completely.

👀 Can cross-chain protocols do more to block stolen crypto?

#Bitget #CryptoHack #THORChain #CryptoSecurity
BREAKING: Bitget just got hit for $350M+ Ok, so this just happened - Bitget (one of the bigger exchanges) lost somewhere around $350-380M out of its hot wallets this week. Not a private key leak either, which honestly would've been worse. Attackers got into a backend system and basically tricked the exchange's own signing process into moving funds out. Small silver lining - Circle and Tether managed to freeze about $318K of the stolen stablecoins within hours. Not much next to the total, sure, but it's proof freezing tools actually work fast when issuers jump on it quick. The part that actually matters for us though? Cold wallets weren't touched. Only the hot side got hit. "Spending hot, savings cold" isn't just something I tell you guys-turns out exchanges live by the same rule. $ETH $BTC $USDC #BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds #Cryptollegiate #WalletSecurity {spot}(ETHUSDT) {spot}(BTCUSDT) {spot}(USDCUSDT) After seeing this, how do you feel about keeping funds on exchanges?
BREAKING:

Bitget just got hit for $350M+
Ok, so this just happened - Bitget (one of the bigger exchanges) lost somewhere around $350-380M out of its hot wallets this week. Not a private key leak either, which honestly would've been worse. Attackers got into a backend system and basically tricked the exchange's own signing process into moving funds out.
Small silver lining - Circle and Tether managed to freeze about $318K of the stolen stablecoins within hours. Not much next to the total, sure, but it's proof freezing tools actually work fast when issuers jump on it quick.
The part that actually matters for us though? Cold wallets weren't touched. Only the hot side got hit. "Spending hot, savings cold" isn't just something I tell you guys-turns out exchanges live by the same rule.

$ETH $BTC $USDC

#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds

#Cryptollegiate #WalletSecurity


After seeing this, how do you feel about keeping funds on exchanges?
Still fine,insurance covers it
Want to self-custody now
Not my money, doesn't matter
Already moved to cold storage
22 hr(s) left
🚨 Stolen Funds Hit Another Roadblock More than $50M in attempted transfers linked to the Bitget hack were reportedly blocked by NEAR Intents. Another attempted movement through Chainflip was rejected and returned to the original wallet. On-chain tracking is proving critical. $BTC $ETH $BNB #bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
🚨 Stolen Funds Hit Another Roadblock
More than $50M in attempted transfers linked to the Bitget hack were reportedly blocked by NEAR Intents.
Another attempted movement through Chainflip was rejected and returned to the original wallet.
On-chain tracking is proving critical. $BTC $ETH $BNB

#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
$RUNE just told everyone something ugly out loud Bitget got hacked for 387 million, funds moved onto THORChain, and THORChain said no we won't freeze it, we're decentralized Same protocol froze itself fast when its own money was on the line before So decentralization only applies when it's not their funds? Real question, does THORChain survive this or does trust actually break here #BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds {future}(RUNEUSDT)
$RUNE just told everyone something ugly out loud

Bitget got hacked for 387 million, funds moved onto THORChain, and THORChain said no we won't freeze it, we're decentralized

Same protocol froze itself fast when its own money was on the line before

So decentralization only applies when it's not their funds?

Real question, does THORChain survive this or does trust actually break here
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds
Bitget anti-stolen funds topic enters the forum’s hot list|Refusing an exchange does not equal freezing assets|Before XMR is confirmed at $548.2, I’ll wait My stance is to first distinguish the status of funds, and not use the “anti-stolen funds” headline as a reason to chase privacy coins. The forum has added a BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds topic, but the phrase “cannot be transferred” cannot automatically be expanded to mean that all stolen funds have been frozen, nor can it be used to infer that XMR has shown a confirmed buy order. In this round of news account reposts, MistTrack is cited as saying that the relevant funds attempted to go through Chainflip; after the funds were rejected by the broker, they were returned, and they were not frozen. I have not yet obtained complete first-hand cross-evidence of the corresponding transactions and the original monitoring post, so I list it only as information to be verified, without announcing specific amounts, the attacker’s identity, or whether the funds were recovered. What can be verified is that Bitget’s official statement still says that tracking and recovery work is ongoing; frozen, recovered, and unresolved amounts should be reported after verification. I further checked Chainflip’s official API documentation: it includes a function that rejects requests from being credited, but it notes that it only supports Bitcoin, and that the broker can only mark transactions that enter its own deposit channel. A successful API call does not mean that refunds are possible at every stage, and the documentation also limits it under conditions that have not yet been witnessed on-chain. This mechanism can explain why “a single exchange was rejected” and “a full-chain freeze” are not the same thing, but it cannot be used the other way around to prove that the specific case in the news necessarily used this interface. How does this affect the crypto market? My view is that security incidents impact risk appetite, and also remind traders to verify exit paths. The parties involved, the timing, and the evidence for returned funds, frozen funds, and recovered funds are different; if the same pool of money accumulates repeatedly across multiple states, it can exaggerate recovery progress. For XMR, privacy attributes do not guarantee that every transaction entry point is usable. I won’t write as “funds must necessarily switch to Monero,” and I also have no evidence that XMR took part in this attempt. Observe the supported platforms, the bid-ask spread, and the withdrawal status—don’t speculate about the flow of illegal funds, and don’t hand over keys to so-called recovery services. The market’s actual reaction can only be described using what has been seen: as of 17:54 Beijing time, Kraken’s XMR/USD last traded at $543.09; the rolling 24-hour low is $525.00 and the high is $547.91, still within the range. The USD quote is not USDT, and there is no evidence that this fluctuation is attributable to anti-stolen-funds reporting. $548.2 is a confirmation level I set manually; if it breaks and falls, a loss of $546.5 would weaken the bullish case. If this were my own trading, I would not participate. Assuming position size is zero, I would only consider unleveraged spot longs. If the hourly close is above $548.2, and after a pullback it holds between $546.5 and $548.2 with normal platform trading and deposits/withdrawals, then I would try a position with at most 0.3% of total capital; $552 after a halving, full flat at $557. Hard stop-loss at $541.5, or fully exit if two consecutive hourly closes are below $546.5. If it breaks down before entry and drops below $524.5, cancel. If there are channel anomalies, the spread widens, or the official corrects key facts, I would also withdraw the participation conditions. I won’t chase the target, won’t average down losses, and if it never triggers, there’s no trade or profit. Sources: [API documentation](https://docs.chainflip.io/brokers/broker-api/requests), [official event page](https://www.bitget.com/campaigns/bitget-security-incident-2026). #BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds #XMR The above is only my personal market observation and does not constitute investment advice.
Bitget anti-stolen funds topic enters the forum’s hot list|Refusing an exchange does not equal freezing assets|Before XMR is confirmed at $548.2, I’ll wait

My stance is to first distinguish the status of funds, and not use the “anti-stolen funds” headline as a reason to chase privacy coins. The forum has added a BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds topic, but the phrase “cannot be transferred” cannot automatically be expanded to mean that all stolen funds have been frozen, nor can it be used to infer that XMR has shown a confirmed buy order.

In this round of news account reposts, MistTrack is cited as saying that the relevant funds attempted to go through Chainflip; after the funds were rejected by the broker, they were returned, and they were not frozen. I have not yet obtained complete first-hand cross-evidence of the corresponding transactions and the original monitoring post, so I list it only as information to be verified, without announcing specific amounts, the attacker’s identity, or whether the funds were recovered. What can be verified is that Bitget’s official statement still says that tracking and recovery work is ongoing; frozen, recovered, and unresolved amounts should be reported after verification.

I further checked Chainflip’s official API documentation: it includes a function that rejects requests from being credited, but it notes that it only supports Bitcoin, and that the broker can only mark transactions that enter its own deposit channel. A successful API call does not mean that refunds are possible at every stage, and the documentation also limits it under conditions that have not yet been witnessed on-chain. This mechanism can explain why “a single exchange was rejected” and “a full-chain freeze” are not the same thing, but it cannot be used the other way around to prove that the specific case in the news necessarily used this interface.

How does this affect the crypto market? My view is that security incidents impact risk appetite, and also remind traders to verify exit paths. The parties involved, the timing, and the evidence for returned funds, frozen funds, and recovered funds are different; if the same pool of money accumulates repeatedly across multiple states, it can exaggerate recovery progress.

For XMR, privacy attributes do not guarantee that every transaction entry point is usable. I won’t write as “funds must necessarily switch to Monero,” and I also have no evidence that XMR took part in this attempt. Observe the supported platforms, the bid-ask spread, and the withdrawal status—don’t speculate about the flow of illegal funds, and don’t hand over keys to so-called recovery services.

The market’s actual reaction can only be described using what has been seen: as of 17:54 Beijing time, Kraken’s XMR/USD last traded at $543.09; the rolling 24-hour low is $525.00 and the high is $547.91, still within the range. The USD quote is not USDT, and there is no evidence that this fluctuation is attributable to anti-stolen-funds reporting. $548.2 is a confirmation level I set manually; if it breaks and falls, a loss of $546.5 would weaken the bullish case.

If this were my own trading, I would not participate. Assuming position size is zero, I would only consider unleveraged spot longs. If the hourly close is above $548.2, and after a pullback it holds between $546.5 and $548.2 with normal platform trading and deposits/withdrawals, then I would try a position with at most 0.3% of total capital; $552 after a halving, full flat at $557. Hard stop-loss at $541.5, or fully exit if two consecutive hourly closes are below $546.5. If it breaks down before entry and drops below $524.5, cancel. If there are channel anomalies, the spread widens, or the official corrects key facts, I would also withdraw the participation conditions. I won’t chase the target, won’t average down losses, and if it never triggers, there’s no trade or profit.

Sources: [API documentation](https://docs.chainflip.io/brokers/broker-api/requests), [official event page](https://www.bitget.com/campaigns/bitget-security-incident-2026).
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds #XMR
The above is only my personal market observation and does not constitute investment advice.
🚨 BITGET HACKER CAN'T MOVE THE STOLEN FUNDS! 👀 A $crypto heist is only half the story… moving the stolen money is another challenge! 🕵️‍♂️ Reports surrounding the Bitget hack suggest the attacker is facing difficulties moving the stolen funds. 💰 Why does this matter? 🔍 Blockchain transactions are publicly traceable. 🧊 Suspicious wallets can attract attention from exchanges and investigators. ⚠️ Moving stolen crypto without being detected can be difficult. But remember: Funds being difficult to move doesn't automatically mean they have been recovered. The investigation and tracking process still matters. 💡 Crypto security reminder: Always use trusted platforms, enable 2FA, and stay alert to suspicious links. 👇 What do you think? Can blockchain transparency help investigators track stolen crypto more effectively? #Bitget #CryptoSecurity #Blockchain #CryptoNews #Hacker #BinanceSquare #Write2Earn#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds
🚨 BITGET HACKER CAN'T MOVE THE STOLEN FUNDS! 👀

A $crypto heist is only half the story… moving the stolen money is another challenge! 🕵️‍♂️

Reports surrounding the Bitget hack suggest the attacker is facing difficulties moving the stolen funds.

💰 Why does this matter?

🔍 Blockchain transactions are publicly traceable.
🧊 Suspicious wallets can attract attention from exchanges and investigators.
⚠️ Moving stolen crypto without being detected can be difficult.

But remember: Funds being difficult to move doesn't automatically mean they have been recovered.

The investigation and tracking process still matters.

💡 Crypto security reminder: Always use trusted platforms, enable 2FA, and stay alert to suspicious links.

👇 What do you think? Can blockchain transparency help investigators track stolen crypto more effectively?

#Bitget #CryptoSecurity #Blockchain #CryptoNews #Hacker #BinanceSquare #Write2Earn#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds Binance Square: 🚨 Attempt to move stolen Bitget funds fails! According to MistTrack’s tracking today, the attackers tried to transfer part of the stolen funds via Chainflip, but the deposit was rejected. The funds were sent back along the original route instead of completing the transfer. 💰 The amount of funds affected by the incident was estimated at about $388 million, while tracking entities continue to monitor the movement of funds on the network. 🛡️ What’s notable here is that tracking funds on the blockchain can make moving stolen funds more difficult. 👀 Question for you: Do you think blockchain transparency truly helps in recovering stolen funds? 👇 Share your thoughts #Bitget #Chainflip #Crypto #Bitcoin #Blockchain #CryptoSecurity #BinanceSquare #BTC
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds Binance Square:

🚨 Attempt to move stolen Bitget funds fails!

According to MistTrack’s tracking today, the attackers tried to transfer part of the stolen funds via Chainflip, but the deposit was rejected. The funds were sent back along the original route instead of completing the transfer.

💰 The amount of funds affected by the incident was estimated at about $388 million, while tracking entities continue to monitor the movement of funds on the network.

🛡️ What’s notable here is that tracking funds on the blockchain can make moving stolen funds more difficult.

👀 Question for you:
Do you think blockchain transparency truly helps in recovering stolen funds?

👇 Share your thoughts

#Bitget #Chainflip #Crypto #Bitcoin #Blockchain #CryptoSecurity #BinanceSquare #BTC
everyone thinks once a cex gets drained the funds vanish into a mixer forever but actually the bitget hacker just failed to move the stolen coins. ngl the real pain isn't the headline itself. it's that 3am moment when you don't know if your $USDT is frozen, already gone, or about to get yoinked while you're still asleep. this is a clean case study. hacker hits bitget, tries to move the bag, and can't. tracing kicked in, addresses got frozen, wallets went dead. that's not luck. chains are more transparent now and the freeze playbook actually works when teams move fast. still ser, if you're parking size on an exchange because greed is sitting at 69 and $PEPE is ripping, you're betting the next crew is as clumsy as this one. they won't be. same people will keep chasing $SHIB and treat security like someone else's problem until it's their screenshot on the timeline. anyone else seeing this as a warning or just another headline to fade? #BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds #HackersDrainOver12
everyone thinks once a cex gets drained the funds vanish into a mixer forever but actually the bitget hacker just failed to move the stolen coins.

ngl the real pain isn't the headline itself. it's that 3am moment when you don't know if your $USDT is frozen, already gone, or about to get yoinked while you're still asleep.

this is a clean case study. hacker hits bitget, tries to move the bag, and can't. tracing kicked in, addresses got frozen, wallets went dead.

that's not luck. chains are more transparent now and the freeze playbook actually works when teams move fast.

still ser, if you're parking size on an exchange because greed is sitting at 69 and $PEPE is ripping, you're betting the next crew is as clumsy as this one. they won't be. same people will keep chasing $SHIB and treat security like someone else's problem until it's their screenshot on the timeline.

anyone else seeing this as a warning or just another headline to fade?
#BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds #HackersDrainOver12
206 Atlas:
Freezing is a stopgap, not a solution. If the hacker swaps to privacy coins or non-custodial mixers before the freeze hits, the funds are gone regardless of chain transparency.
🛡️ #BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds The Bitget hack continues to face obstacles. Reported attempts to move stolen assets through cross-chain infrastructure have been blocked or rejected. Every failed transfer gives investigators another opportunity to trace the funds. $BTC $XRP $ETH #bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
🛡️ #BitgetHackerFailsToMoveStolenFunds
The Bitget hack continues to face obstacles.
Reported attempts to move stolen assets through cross-chain infrastructure have been blocked or rejected.
Every failed transfer gives investigators another opportunity to trace the funds. $BTC $XRP $ETH

#bitgethackerfailstomovestolenfunds
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number