quantum

Could BlackRock "Fire" Bitcoin Devs? The Quantum Debate Heating Up
The Bitcoin community is buzzing after VC Nic Carter warned of a potential "corporate takeover." The reason? A perceived lack of urgency regarding quantum-resistant upgrades.
Why It Matters for Traders
If big institutions feel their billions are unsafe, they won't exit—they'll attempt to fix the protocol themselves. This could lead to a massive fork or a change in how Bitcoin is governed.
The Core Data:
Supply at Risk:
BlackRock holds roughly 3.6% of the total Bitcoin supply.
Security Gap:
While only a fraction of addresses are currently vulnerable, the fear factor is driving a new narrative.
Price Impact:
Some suggest BTC’s recent price underperformance is tied to these looming technical fears.
Community Sentiment
The industry is split. While some see quantum as an existential threat needing an immediate patch, others believe the tech is decades away from being a real problem. For traders, the real risk is the potential for a "corporate" version of Bitcoin competing with the original vision.
#BTC #CryptoNews #trading #blockchain #quantum

Is Bitcoin Really Under Threat?
Headlines scream about quantum computers breaking Bitcoin, but the reality is far less dramatic. Only a tiny fraction of BTC is exposed, and practical danger is decades away.
still, like Ethereum today, Bitcoin’s strength is often invisible. When technology works perfectly and the network runs smoothly, the market doesn’t cheer — it just ignores it. That’s exactly what can make the next big move explosive.
How Bitcoin Could Be Vulnerable — And Why It Isn’t
Bitcoin relies on two cryptographic pillars:
ECDSA + Schnorr signatures
SHA-256 hashing
Quantum computers could theoretically attack these. But only 1.6 million BTC in legacy addresses are exposed — and just 10,200 BTC could realistically move markets.
Even if a quantum hacker existed today, cracking these wallets would take years per address. Panic is unnecessary — just like traders ignore Ethereum’s upgrades even when fees drop and Layer 1 activity surges.
The Quantum Computing Reality Check
Modern quantum computers are far from powerful enough.Google’s Willow has 105 qubits; breaking Bitcoin in a day would need 13 million — 100,000× stronger.
Experts predict cryptographically relevant quantum computers won’t appear until the 2030s or later.
So the immediate threat? None.
And the psychological threat? That’s another story.
Emotional Truth: Technology vs Market Attention
Traders often forget that real progress doesn’t guarantee instant price action.
Look at Ethereum:
Fees droppedThroughput increasedL1 activity returnedETH continued burning
Yet price barely moves. The market no longer hypes what “just works.”
Bitcoin is similar. Its architecture and defensive upgrades are solid, but traders fear headlines more than they appreciate stability.
This is the invisible stage where future wealth is being quietly built, unseen by the crowd. Patience beats panic.
Why This Matters to Traders
Ignore the hype, focus on fundamentals — BTC’s security is solid.Understand psychology — markets often ignore good news until scarcity or awareness hits.Risk management still matters — protect funds, diversify addresses, and keep calm.
When the crowd isn’t talking, it’s often the best time to act. Just like Ethereum quietly becoming essential L1 infrastructure, Bitcoin quietly strengthens, unseen — until the next rally.

Conclusion
Quantum threats are decades away, and BTC is far from vulnerable. Only a tiny fraction is at risk, and soft forks allow proactive upgrades.
The bigger lesson? Markets ignore what works. They hype what’s noisy. Bitcoin’s quiet strength, like Ethereum’s silent upgrades, is a signal — the stage is set for long-term gains, but only the patient notice.
$BTC $ETH
#WhaleDeRiskETH #quantumcomputers #quantum

Ricercatori cinesi hanno presentato un chip quantistico fotonico a 6 pollici di nitruro di litio a film sottile che accelera di 1.000 volte le prestazioni dei centri dati per l’Intelligenza Artificiale, vincendo il Leading Technology Award al World Internet Conference Wuzhen Summit, superando oltre 400 concorrenti da tutto il mondo.
A differenza delle tech "in sviluppo", questo chip è già in produzione industriale e impiegato in settori come aerospaziale, biomedicina e finanza, raggiungendo potenze di calcolo che superano i limiti dei computer classici.
La Cina ha adottato un approccio nazionale con un fondo pubblico-privato da 1 trilione di RMB (renminbi) per guidare la catena industriale completa, dal design del chip agli algoritmi quantistici.
Produzione di wafer TFLN a 12.000 unità annue con modulazione superiore a 110GHz, e integrazione fotonico-elettronica già matura.
Modelli AI con miliardi di parametri sono stati affinati su hardware quantistico.
Gli USA, con investimenti federali più bassi e orizzonti di commercializzazione distanti (15-30 anni), sembrano in ritardo e dipendono ancora molto da annunci promozionali più che da applicazioni concrete
.Tecnologie specifiche evidenziano la superiorità cinese: il computer quantistico superconduttore Zuchongzhi 3.0 a 105 qubit è 1 quadrilione di volte più veloce del supercomputer Frontier in certi compiti.
La fotonica Jiuzhang 2.0 ha risolto problemi in 200 secondi che i computer classici impiegherebbero 2,5 miliardi di anni.
Ora, il nuovo chip fotonico accelera di 1000 volte i carichi di lavoro AI.
Negli USA, Google e IBM producono chip simili ma con applicazioni ancora limitate e tempi di sviluppo più lunghi.
Il contesto geopolitico mostra la strategia USA volta a controllare l'accesso cinese a tecnologie avanzate tramite sanzioni, ma la Cina ha oltrepassato questo freno con l’integrazione quantistica fotonica e una catena produttiva autonoma.
Parallelamente, mentre gli USA sponsorizzano chip al silicio tradizionale, la Cina costruisce infrastrutture per 6G, AI e reti quantistiche globali, con applicazioni già operative in ospedali civili, mentre gli USA procedono più lentamente e con forte orientamento militare nelle ricerche quantistiche.
La narrativa occidentale rimarrà di allarme, ma i fatti mostrano una supremazia cinese tecnologica concreta e già industrializzata.