web3_efe's Profile | Binance Square

When I look at a token, the first question I increasingly ask is: does the money the project earns ultimately have anything to do with the token?

We’ve all seen enough TVL, partnership lists, and ecosystem stories. What really sets projects apart is often whether they have sustainable business revenue—and whether there’s a clear path for that revenue to flow back. On the RWA / Private Credit side, the mechanism I’ve been watching lately is $ZIG.

ZIG Markets handles real financial business such as invoice financing, trade financing, and payment financing: the asset side develops products, the distribution side connects institutions and capital, and the platform earns fees. Starting in July 2026, the business will use a portion of realized revenue to buy $ZIG on the open market—not a “maybe we’ll buy back in the future” story, but an Acquisition Cycle that runs monthly and publicly reports the numbers. The official documentation also states that ZIG Markets decides when and how much to buy; purchases aren’t automatic, and there’s no guarantee of a fixed monthly amount.

The four rounds disclosed so far were roughly:
· C1 (July): approximately 1,038,600 $ZIG
· C2 (August): approximately 1,130,700 $ZIG
· C3 (September): approximately 1,850,000 $ZIG
· C4 (October): approximately 1,350,000 $ZIG
That’s about 5.37 million tokens in total. The numbers fluctuate with actual lending and fees each month. September was notably higher than July and August, which itself shows that “the size follows the business,” not the market’s slogans.

The tokens don’t simply disappear after they’re bought: about half go into the Ecosystem Pool, while the other half is subject to a validator governance vote—if approved, they’re permanently removed from circulation; if not, they stay in the community pool. On-chain proposals and the Transparency Dashboard make it possible to check each round. The key isn’t how much was bought in a single month, but whether the flywheel can keep working over the long term: Capital Deployed → product scale → Revenue → open-market purchases of $ZIG.

Cases like Hyperliquid have brought the question of “how revenue flows back to the token” to the forefront of the market again. There’s no need to force a “who’s the next X” comparison. What’s more worth noting is whether projects in RWA / trade finance are actually making the link between revenue and token purchases work. $ZIG has now publicly reported figures for four consecutive rounds. The next thing to watch is whether the buying curve rises along with business growth.

Sources to check: the ZIGChain Tokenomics Transparency Dashboard and the project’s public Acquisition announcements for each round. $ZIG #RWA #ZIGFinance

web3_efe

Trending Topics