The urge to chase a train that already left is the strongest pull of all. But on today’s list, $AGT is about 17% below its daily high and $IDOL about 8% below. $ICNT is on the same list too. The story belongs to those who bought near the top. I’m watching whether the high gets retested or the move stalls right here.
Not financial advice. DYOR.
Sulaiman 零号猎人
·
--
🔥 3 TOKENS. 3 LEGACIES. ONE ZEROHUNTER QUESTION.
Green candles catch attention. But what makes a project worth remembering? 🎯
🟠 $HOT — Can its original peer-to-peer vision translate into real hosting demand?
🔵 $MITO — Can fragmented liquidity become a unified financial advantage?
🟢 $OGN — Can real protocol revenue create lasting value for token holders?
My ZeroHunter rule:
Technology creates the possibility. Adoption creates the evidence.
🎁 ZEROHUNTER RED PACKET QUIZ
If you could investigate ONLY ONE for the next market cycle, which would you choose — and what evidence would convince you?
Narrative is interesting. Reality is more interesting. 🎯
A “25% burn” sounds like supply just shrank. My question: which 25%? Per Lisk’s announcement, a burn of 100M $LSK has started. Per the proposal, these tokens sat in the 2027–2033 vesting wallets. So the tokens that burned are ones that had never reached the market. That lowers total supply. But how much it changes tradable supply, I haven’t been able to verify yet. My guess: little or nothing. That’s an assumption, not proof.
Also on the table: Lisk Chain shuts down on Oct 31, and the token continues on Base and Ethereum LSK carries Binance’s Monitoring Tag (since Jul 24) Everyone is watching the burn number. I’m watching whether circulating supply on CoinGecko/CMC actually changes. If it moves, there’s a story. If it doesn’t, it’s a headline burn. What data would you check before making up your mind? Not financial advice. DYOR.
Gold is supposed to protect you. Bitcoin is supposed to change money.
So why are both under pressure?
$XAUT is trading around $4,050, while $BTC is near $80,000. Both have fallen significantly from their respective highs.
One possible connection: **interest rates.**
When markets expect higher rates, assets that pay no interest face a tougher comparison. A stronger dollar and rising Treasury yields have also pressured gold.
But here's the part worth watching.
Gold has centuries of history behind it. Bitcoin has a completely different market structure. One day of similar moves doesn't make them the same trade.
**The real test is what happens after the next major rate signal.** Do both react together again, or does the correlation break?
If you hold an asset for protection, one question matters: *protection against what kind of risk?*
When a token jumps, I first want to know: when did its last piece of good news actually arrive?
HUMA recently climbed more than 16% in a few hours.
This protocol is built on Solana and lends money for global payments. One source says its deposits grew 132% in Q3 2025. After that, I couldn’t find any verifiable number.
That’s where I get stuck.
HUMA’s story stands on lending fees. Half of the borrowers’ fees are used to buy HUMA from the market and burn it. So if lending keeps running, the token benefits. If lending slows, the burning slows too.
The price picture is mixed as well. About 67% below the May 2025 high. But nearly double the February low. And only around 33% of total supply is circulating right now.
From above, it looks like a fall. From below, it looks like a recovery. The story changes depending on where you stand.
I’m watching one thing: whether any verifiable 2026 lending or fee number comes out. If it doesn’t, this jump is only a price story.
What number would convince you: loan volume, or tokens burned?