What I’d delegate: Routine, reversible, or easy-to-check tasks — monitoring, research summaries, drafting, small rebalances within strict limits. Not large transfers or irreversible decisions. What’s still hard on-chain: Trust and meaning, not execution. Distinguishing real contracts from honeypots, verifying the agent actually followed the intended goal, handling black swans, and clear accountability. Irreversible transactions make mistakes permanent. What would make me trust it more: On-chain enforceable limits (session keys, spending caps, allowlists), a proven track record with small amounts, full auditability, and human co-sign for anything big. Trust should be earned through constraints and evidence, not just capability.
What I’d delegate to an agent: Routine, repetitive stuff that doesn’t need big decisions monitoring wallets and on-chain activity, summarizing news or proposals, drafting posts, or checking mining/VPS status. Final calls and anything involving real money stay with me. What’s still difficult on-chain: The UX is still clunky (gas, approvals, key recovery), hidden risks when things get composed together, and clear accountability if something goes wrong. Good privacy that can still be audited is also hard. What would make me trust an agent more: Clear logs, limits I can set myself (like max spending), easy override anytime, and proven safety on smaller tasks first.