CryptoLinus
2.1k Postlar
CryptoLinus
Crypto Trader for 9 Years | Follow for proven systems to build a profitable trading strategy
High-Frequency Trader
4.7 Years
19 Kuzatilmoqda
1.1K+ Kuzatuvchilar
6.7K+ Yoqdi
Postlar
Barchasi
Iqtiboslar
Videolar
$BTC Price has officially exited the bottoming zone...
During the previous bear market, whenever price exited this zone, it confirmed the bottom was in.
The confirmation this time will be whether price holds 69K on the retest.
Holding my swing long from 59.4K.
During the previous bear market, whenever price exited this zone, it confirmed the bottom was in.
The confirmation this time will be whether price holds 69K on the retest.
Holding my swing long from 59.4K.
💰 WILD BET: This newly created wallet made $7 MILLION longing $ETH hours before the pump.
The wallet deposited $20M in USDC and opened a 4x long on 20,000 ETH at $1,936.
$ETH now trades around $2.2k, up nearly 18% since the whale opened the position.
Trader is now sitting on $7M in unrealized profit.
Perfect timing or insider trading?👀💰
WILD BET: This newly created wallet made $7 MILLION longing ETH hours before the pump.
The wallet deposited $20M in USDC and opened a 4x long on 20,000 ETH at $1,936.
ETH now trades around $2.2k, up nearly 18% since the whale opened the position.
Trader is now sitting on $7M in unrealized profit.
The wallet deposited $20M in USDC and opened a 4x long on 20,000 ETH at $1,936.
$ETH now trades around $2.2k, up nearly 18% since the whale opened the position.
Trader is now sitting on $7M in unrealized profit.
Perfect timing or insider trading?👀💰
WILD BET: This newly created wallet made $7 MILLION longing ETH hours before the pump.
The wallet deposited $20M in USDC and opened a 4x long on 20,000 ETH at $1,936.
ETH now trades around $2.2k, up nearly 18% since the whale opened the position.
Trader is now sitting on $7M in unrealized profit.
$PUMP Next level reached and now at the range high after a +100% move from the breakout.
Currently at the highest level since last year november with a lot of equal highs here. Could cause a further squeeze if we breach this level.
Currently at the highest level since last year november with a lot of equal highs here. Could cause a further squeeze if we breach this level.
$BTC Everyone is talking about the Monthly FVG now and how we’ve rejected there every single time we’ve tapped into it throughout this bear market.
But the hard truth is: It’s not going to give us a rejection this time.
I shorted the entire bear market using that exact same concept. I spilled the sauce when it was hot and barely anyone was paying attention to it. That single setup helped me catch 5 high-RR shorts on the way down.
Now I’m not taking another short just because the same setup is showing up again.
Why?
Because once a pattern becomes obvious and everyone starts positioning around the same idea, the market has a way of exploiting that consensus.
The edge was in identifying it before everyone else did. Now that it’s obvious, the positioning has to change.
Just look at the structure.
When have we ever seen this strong of a bullish impulse into a Monthly FVG throughout this bear market?
Short answer: We never did.
The market is changing, whether you like it or not.
You can either adapt and profit from this transition, or stay fixated on “what you think should happen” and keep becoming liquidity.
But the hard truth is: It’s not going to give us a rejection this time.
I shorted the entire bear market using that exact same concept. I spilled the sauce when it was hot and barely anyone was paying attention to it. That single setup helped me catch 5 high-RR shorts on the way down.
Now I’m not taking another short just because the same setup is showing up again.
Why?
Because once a pattern becomes obvious and everyone starts positioning around the same idea, the market has a way of exploiting that consensus.
The edge was in identifying it before everyone else did. Now that it’s obvious, the positioning has to change.
Just look at the structure.
When have we ever seen this strong of a bullish impulse into a Monthly FVG throughout this bear market?
Short answer: We never did.
The market is changing, whether you like it or not.
You can either adapt and profit from this transition, or stay fixated on “what you think should happen” and keep becoming liquidity.
Citadel made me think about identity on Dusk in a slightly different way.
I used to associate compliance with having to reveal more information, but selective disclosure points in the opposite direction. An investor could prove something like residency or accreditation without automatically exposing their entire identity to the application.
That sounds like a small difference until you put it inside a regulated market.
If a security has eligibility requirements, the platform needs to know whether the investor qualifies. It does not necessarily need their full personal history, address, or every other piece of information attached to their identity.
That is where I think Citadel becomes useful. The proof and the underlying information do not have to be treated as the same thing.
I hope the Dusk devs keep pushing this further and make it easier for applications to use these proofs without developers having to build complicated identity systems from scratch.
The part I would like to see is how far this can go when different financial products have different eligibility rules.
Would you rather prove only what the market needs to know, or give the platform your full identity every time?
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
I used to associate compliance with having to reveal more information, but selective disclosure points in the opposite direction. An investor could prove something like residency or accreditation without automatically exposing their entire identity to the application.
That sounds like a small difference until you put it inside a regulated market.
If a security has eligibility requirements, the platform needs to know whether the investor qualifies. It does not necessarily need their full personal history, address, or every other piece of information attached to their identity.
That is where I think Citadel becomes useful. The proof and the underlying information do not have to be treated as the same thing.
I hope the Dusk devs keep pushing this further and make it easier for applications to use these proofs without developers having to build complicated identity systems from scratch.
The part I would like to see is how far this can go when different financial products have different eligibility rules.
Would you rather prove only what the market needs to know, or give the platform your full identity every time?
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
A strange thing happened on a Binance P2P order that looked completely normal at first.
The buyer had a verified profile, a solid trading history, and the payment arrived exactly as expected. Nothing about the transaction suspicious.
Then, after the payment was received, the buyer asked for a refund to a different account because they had “sent from the wrong one.”
That changed everything. The money was already in my account, but sending it back manually would create a second transfer that was no longer tied cleanly to the original P2P order. I didn't want to create a new problem while trying to solve the first one.
The order stayed untouched while I kept the payment proof and chat history and used the official Appeal process.
That experience made one distinction much clearer to me:
Receiving the correct money does not mean every follow-up request is safe to accept.
Before completing a P2P trade, I check the counterparty and the payment details. During the order, I keep communication on Binance. If someone suddenly wants a refund, a new account, or a different arrangement, I don't improvise.
A clean transaction should end with the same trail it started with.
@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan
The buyer had a verified profile, a solid trading history, and the payment arrived exactly as expected. Nothing about the transaction suspicious.
Then, after the payment was received, the buyer asked for a refund to a different account because they had “sent from the wrong one.”
That changed everything. The money was already in my account, but sending it back manually would create a second transfer that was no longer tied cleanly to the original P2P order. I didn't want to create a new problem while trying to solve the first one.
The order stayed untouched while I kept the payment proof and chat history and used the official Appeal process.
That experience made one distinction much clearer to me:
Receiving the correct money does not mean every follow-up request is safe to accept.
Before completing a P2P trade, I check the counterparty and the payment details. During the order, I keep communication on Binance. If someone suddenly wants a refund, a new account, or a different arrangement, I don't improvise.
A clean transaction should end with the same trail it started with.
@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan
Bitcoin has completely flipped its 4H market structure after a powerful move from the $63K support zone into major resistance.
BTC is currently sitting around $68,018 after testing the $70.5K area and pulling back to consolidate.
The important part:
Bitcoin didn’t just bounce.
It reclaimed key levels that previously acted as resistance:
$64K
$65.7K
$67.2K
That changes the structure.
The market has moved from a lower-high consolidation phase into a potential expansion phase.
Now the level everyone is watching:
$70.5K.
A clean reclaim and hold above this area opens the path toward:
$71.5K
$72K
The main thing I’m watching now is whether buyers can defend the breakout.
$67.2K is the key level.
As long as Bitcoin continues holding above that zone, dips are likely to be viewed as healthy consolidation rather than a breakdown.
The breakout happened.
Now we wait to see if Bitcoin can turn resistance into support and continue the next leg higher.
BTC is currently sitting around $68,018 after testing the $70.5K area and pulling back to consolidate.
The important part:
Bitcoin didn’t just bounce.
It reclaimed key levels that previously acted as resistance:
$64K
$65.7K
$67.2K
That changes the structure.
The market has moved from a lower-high consolidation phase into a potential expansion phase.
Now the level everyone is watching:
$70.5K.
A clean reclaim and hold above this area opens the path toward:
$71.5K
$72K
The main thing I’m watching now is whether buyers can defend the breakout.
$67.2K is the key level.
As long as Bitcoin continues holding above that zone, dips are likely to be viewed as healthy consolidation rather than a breakdown.
The breakout happened.
Now we wait to see if Bitcoin can turn resistance into support and continue the next leg higher.
Tasdiqlangan
A hacker is buying $ETH as the price rises!
As the market rallied, an unknown hacker spent $38.53M to buy 18,272 $ETH at an average price of $2,109.
As the market rallied, an unknown hacker spent $38.53M to buy 18,272 $ETH at an average price of $2,109.
Bitcoin hit 69k - finally starting to fill the gap.
Real challenge will be 72k area.
Aaaand quick reminder: weekly trend is down until we see a higher high above 82k...Bitcoin hit 69k - finally starting to fill the gap.
Real challenge will be 72k area.
Aaaand quick reminder: weekly trend is down until we see a higher high above 82k...
Real challenge will be 72k area.
Aaaand quick reminder: weekly trend is down until we see a higher high above 82k...Bitcoin hit 69k - finally starting to fill the gap.
Real challenge will be 72k area.
Aaaand quick reminder: weekly trend is down until we see a higher high above 82k...
Someone just opened a $59,150,000 $ETH long with 20x leverage.
Whales are expecting more pump.
Whales are expecting more pump.
$BTC Deja vu played out...
Price followed the previous bear market pattern.
Now price must reclaim the 65–66K region for continuation to the upside.
Price followed the previous bear market pattern.
Now price must reclaim the 65–66K region for continuation to the upside.
$BTC Remember market follows liquidity,
And looking at the current scenario, we have a ton of liquidity stacked below 62.5k,
Seeing all the news events happening starting from today,
I think it's very likely we might see distribution from here and finally hunt the levels below,
As we have been engineering liquidity sub 62k from the past 1.5 months.
And looking at the current scenario, we have a ton of liquidity stacked below 62.5k,
Seeing all the news events happening starting from today,
I think it's very likely we might see distribution from here and finally hunt the levels below,
As we have been engineering liquidity sub 62k from the past 1.5 months.
The $BTC CVD indicator shows buying by whales.
Retail investors sold during the short-term decline. However, buying by whales continues to maintain an increase trend.
There are still no large-scale sell or buy walls. Furthermore, large-scale selling by whales has not been confirmed.
The positive trend is continuing.
Retail investors sold during the short-term decline. However, buying by whales continues to maintain an increase trend.
There are still no large-scale sell or buy walls. Furthermore, large-scale selling by whales has not been confirmed.
The positive trend is continuing.
Tasdiqlangan
The Dusk node requirements surprised me a little because they are much lighter than I expected for a network targeting regulated financial infrastructure.
A provisioner can run with 2 CPU cores, 4 GB RAM, 50 GB storage and a 10 Mbps connection. The minimum stake is 1,000 DUSK, and the node needs to stay online and synchronized to participate in consensus.
I actually like this detail because people usually talk about Dusk through privacy, RWAs and compliance, but none of that matters much if running the underlying network requires some massive infrastructure setup.
There is also a separate prover role, which makes sense when the network is dealing with zero knowledge workloads instead of putting every kind of computation onto the same machine.
So the architecture feels a little more practical to me now. A relatively modest provisioner handles consensus participation, while heavier proving work can be separated when needed.
That is a very different thing from simply saying Dusk is built for financial markets.
I’m more curious about how this separation performs once confidential financial applications start generating real proving demand.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
A provisioner can run with 2 CPU cores, 4 GB RAM, 50 GB storage and a 10 Mbps connection. The minimum stake is 1,000 DUSK, and the node needs to stay online and synchronized to participate in consensus.
I actually like this detail because people usually talk about Dusk through privacy, RWAs and compliance, but none of that matters much if running the underlying network requires some massive infrastructure setup.
There is also a separate prover role, which makes sense when the network is dealing with zero knowledge workloads instead of putting every kind of computation onto the same machine.
So the architecture feels a little more practical to me now. A relatively modest provisioner handles consensus participation, while heavier proving work can be separated when needed.
That is a very different thing from simply saying Dusk is built for financial markets.
I’m more curious about how this separation performs once confidential financial applications start generating real proving demand.
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
A Binance P2P Order Came With One Extra Instruction
A USDT sell order was already active when the buyer added one more request in the chat: use a different payment note than the one normally associated with the transaction.
The amount was unchanged. The bank account was unchanged. Only the payment reference was different.
That small change matters because a clean P2P transaction should be easy to connect from the buyer, the order, the payment and the chat. Adding an unrelated reference makes that trail harder to understand if the transaction later needs to be reviewed.
The safer move is simple: follow the payment details shown in the active Binance P2P order. Keep the transaction inside the platform, check the counterparty information, and retain the Order ID and payment record.
So I told the buyer to follow the original order instructions. The trade stayed inside Binance P2P, where the escrow, order chat and Appeal process could still be used if anything went wrong.
A small payment-reference change might look harmless, but I would never trade a clean transaction trail for convenience.
Before paying or accepting payment, I now check the order details, payment instructions, counterparty identity and transaction record against each other. If someone suddenly wants a different arrangement, I stop and clarify it through the order.
@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan
A USDT sell order was already active when the buyer added one more request in the chat: use a different payment note than the one normally associated with the transaction.
The amount was unchanged. The bank account was unchanged. Only the payment reference was different.
That small change matters because a clean P2P transaction should be easy to connect from the buyer, the order, the payment and the chat. Adding an unrelated reference makes that trail harder to understand if the transaction later needs to be reviewed.
The safer move is simple: follow the payment details shown in the active Binance P2P order. Keep the transaction inside the platform, check the counterparty information, and retain the Order ID and payment record.
So I told the buyer to follow the original order instructions. The trade stayed inside Binance P2P, where the escrow, order chat and Appeal process could still be used if anything went wrong.
A small payment-reference change might look harmless, but I would never trade a clean transaction trail for convenience.
Before paying or accepting payment, I now check the order details, payment instructions, counterparty identity and transaction record against each other. If someone suddenly wants a different arrangement, I stop and clarify it through the order.
@Binance Vietnam #BinanceP2PAnToan
Bitcoin pushed into the $65K resistance zone before seeing an immediate rejection.
Price wicked into $65,000 before pulling back to around $64,300.
The important part:
Bulls are still defending the $64K area.
$64K has now flipped into the key short-term support level.
As long as BTC holds above this zone, the rejection looks more like consolidation rather than a breakdown.
The levels I’m watching:
Above $65K:
$65.7K
$67.2K
Below $64K:
$63K
$61K
Bitcoin is currently stuck between a key pivot and major resistance.
A clean reclaim of $65.7K would shift momentum back in favour of the bulls.
Until then, patience.
Confirmation over prediction.
Price wicked into $65,000 before pulling back to around $64,300.
The important part:
Bulls are still defending the $64K area.
$64K has now flipped into the key short-term support level.
As long as BTC holds above this zone, the rejection looks more like consolidation rather than a breakdown.
The levels I’m watching:
Above $65K:
$65.7K
$67.2K
Below $64K:
$63K
$61K
Bitcoin is currently stuck between a key pivot and major resistance.
A clean reclaim of $65.7K would shift momentum back in favour of the bulls.
Until then, patience.
Confirmation over prediction.
Ko‘proq kontentni ko‘rish uchun tizimga kiring