Binance Square
#bitmart

bitmart

222,562 views
494 Discussing
Chrome Oasis
·
--
BitMart founder dismisses audit calls as users report blocked funds and unpaid employees. Sheldon Lee says a Chinese-language X account behind the claims was hacked. With wallets, assets, and liabilities on the line, users demand full disclosure. $BTC #CryptoNews #BitMart
BitMart founder dismisses audit calls as users report blocked funds and unpaid employees. Sheldon Lee says a Chinese-language X account behind the claims was hacked. With wallets, assets, and liabilities on the line, users demand full disclosure. $BTC #CryptoNews #BitMart
🚨 BITMART USERS SAY “MY MONEY IS FROZEN” — FOUNDER SAYS THE CLAIMS ARE HACKED 💀 Founder BitMart Sheldon Lee rejects allegations that users are unable to withdraw and that employees have not been paid their July salaries. According to Lee, an X account is publicly calling for the exposure of BitMart’s wallet addresses, assets, liabilities, and reserves that have allegedly been hacked. Meanwhile, users continue to report that funds are frozen, even though BitMart has announced it will stop operating on August 26. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT and Echo Base are urging BitMart to carry out an independent third-party audit or resolve complaints through legal procedures. Notably: the parties are currently making conflicting statements, so it’s not yet possible to determine where users’ funds actually are or BitMart’s financial condition. Users: “Can I withdraw?” BitMart: “The allegations were hacked.” 💀 If an exchange is preparing to shut down and users are still reporting freeze-withdrawal issues, guys, don’t you think the minimum transparency step should be proof of reserves + on-chain wallets or an independent audit? #BrainrotCrypto #bitmart
🚨 BITMART USERS SAY “MY MONEY IS FROZEN” — FOUNDER SAYS THE CLAIMS ARE HACKED 💀

Founder BitMart Sheldon Lee rejects allegations that users are unable to withdraw and that employees have not been paid their July salaries.

According to Lee, an X account is publicly calling for the exposure of BitMart’s wallet addresses, assets, liabilities, and reserves that have allegedly been hacked.

Meanwhile, users continue to report that funds are frozen, even though BitMart has announced it will stop operating on August 26.

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT and Echo Base are urging BitMart to carry out an independent third-party audit or resolve complaints through legal procedures.

Notably: the parties are currently making conflicting statements, so it’s not yet possible to determine where users’ funds actually are or BitMart’s financial condition.

Users: “Can I withdraw?”
BitMart: “The allegations were hacked.” 💀

If an exchange is preparing to shut down and users are still reporting freeze-withdrawal issues, guys, don’t you think the minimum transparency step should be proof of reserves + on-chain wallets or an independent audit?

#BrainrotCrypto #bitmart
好运兵:
从上个月26号提的不到800u,到现在还没到账,bitmart纯纯的诈骗
#bitmart The founder denied a harshly worded open letter, which criticized management and claimed that hackers used the company to post the letter on China’s social media accounts. This open letter, said to have been posted by employees, urged Sheldon Xia and Yi Li to respond to the following issues by August 19: - Where user funds went - Reasons for restrictions on withdrawals - Accounts allegedly linked to management - Allegedly unpaid employee wages - How and when users would receive compensation The letter warned that if management failed to respond, relevant evidence would be submitted to regulators and the police. Xia said the account had been “hacked” and that “the letter was not posted by any current employee.” The incident occurred as BitMart suspended operations, with users reporting that they could not access their account balances.$H {future}(HUSDT)
#bitmart The founder denied a harshly worded open letter, which criticized management and claimed that hackers used the company to post the letter on China’s social media accounts.
This open letter, said to have been posted by employees, urged Sheldon Xia and Yi Li to respond to the following issues by August 19:
- Where user funds went
- Reasons for restrictions on withdrawals
- Accounts allegedly linked to management
- Allegedly unpaid employee wages
- How and when users would receive compensation
The letter warned that if management failed to respond, relevant evidence would be submitted to regulators and the police. Xia said the account had been “hacked” and that “the letter was not posted by any current employee.”
The incident occurred as BitMart suspended operations, with users reporting that they could not access their account balances.$H
Bitmart shut down, employees jointly use the official account to fire back!!! Today, they directly named Sharte and Li Yi, exposing their personal identity information. Users can’t get their money out, and employees haven’t received a single cent of wages or compensation—so you just say “stop operations” and call it a day? Where exactly did the money go? Are the assets still enough? Why are withdrawals continuously getting stuck? If, by August 19th, you keep being vague and pretending to be deaf, then everyone will have to send the evidence to regulators and the media. Have you yourselves managed to withdraw your money? Seriously, as soon as the bear market starts, one exchange after another collapses. #bitmart
Bitmart shut down, employees jointly use the official account to fire back!!!

Today, they directly named Sharte and Li Yi, exposing their personal identity information. Users can’t get their money out, and employees haven’t received a single cent of wages or compensation—so you just say “stop operations” and call it a day?
Where exactly did the money go? Are the assets still enough? Why are withdrawals continuously getting stuck? If, by August 19th, you keep being vague and pretending to be deaf, then everyone will have to send the evidence to regulators and the media.

Have you yourselves managed to withdraw your money? Seriously, as soon as the bear market starts, one exchange after another collapses.
#bitmart
好运兵:
我7月26号提的u,现在还没到账
BitMart noisy controversy and internal unrest before closing, Binance’s bStocks dominate * Binance’s bStocks become the second-largest crypto stock issuer just 2 months after launching. * Internal turmoil at BitMart erupted publicly right before the exchange closed. * The contrast between Binance’s growth and the instability at BitMart draws market attention. #BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #BitMart #Binance #bStocks $btc $eth vlikevn Titanbot Source: CoinTelegraph
BitMart noisy controversy and internal unrest before closing, Binance’s bStocks dominate

* Binance’s bStocks become the second-largest crypto stock issuer just 2 months after launching.
* Internal turmoil at BitMart erupted publicly right before the exchange closed.
* The contrast between Binance’s growth and the instability at BitMart draws market attention.

#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #BitMart #Binance #bStocks

$btc $eth

vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinTelegraph
·
--
Bearish
Holding $BTC0.9 USDT
‌📢 BitMart faces claims over blocked funds and requests for independent audits BitMart is facing mounting pressure from users and critics demanding clarity about the funds deposited on the platform, following reports of blocked withdrawals and unpaid employee salaries. The exchange’s founder, Sheldon Lee, dismissed the allegations as “fabricated rumors” and stated that the company’s account in China on X was… #bitmart #salida #Twitter #Reclamo #comunidad $ETH $BTC {web3_wallet_create}(10x986ee2b944c42d017f52af21c4c69b84dbea35d8)
‌📢 BitMart faces claims over blocked funds and requests for independent audits

BitMart is facing mounting pressure from users and critics demanding clarity about the funds deposited on the platform, following reports of blocked withdrawals and unpaid employee salaries. The exchange’s founder, Sheldon Lee, dismissed the allegations as “fabricated rumors” and stated that the company’s account in China on X was…

#bitmart #salida #Twitter #Reclamo #comunidad $ETH $BTC
Verified
🚨 BitMart insiders are demanding answers. This is getting serious. 💀 BitMart employees have publicly demanded that the leadership provide an explanation before 19/8 regarding users’ assets status, the exchange’s reserves, and the plan to handle withdrawals that are currently being restricted. Key demands: 💰 Proof of reserves: Publicly disclose a wallet that can be verified by a third party 📊 Publish assets, liabilities, and the amount of reserves that can be used 🏦 Explain since when the leadership became aware of financial issues and withdrawal restrictions 👥 Clarify the responsibilities of those who made the decisions 💵 Pay overdue salaries and compensation to employees 🗓️ Disclose repayment plan: remaining asset size, total liabilities, the percentage of users who can recover funds, payment order, and timeline 🔍 Accept independent third-party auditing Notably, the letter also requests clarification on certain accounts and companies related to users’ assets. However, allegations involving specific individuals have not been fully verified yet, so it is not possible to conclude that any law has been broken. BitMart: “Trust us.” Employees: “Cool. Show us the wallets.” 👀💀 This is the important point: it’s not automatically true that the exchange is insolvent just because withdrawals are restricted. But when employees themselves demand disclosure of reserves, liabilities, and the repayment plan, then on-chain transparency + independent auditing are exactly what the market needs to see. If a CEX starts restricting withdrawals, what do you want to see first: Proof of Reserves, Proof of Liabilities, or an independent audit? 👀 #BrainrotCrypto #bitmart
🚨 BitMart insiders are demanding answers. This is getting serious. 💀

BitMart employees have publicly demanded that the leadership provide an explanation before 19/8 regarding users’ assets status, the exchange’s reserves, and the plan to handle withdrawals that are currently being restricted.

Key demands:
💰 Proof of reserves: Publicly disclose a wallet that can be verified by a third party
📊 Publish assets, liabilities, and the amount of reserves that can be used
🏦 Explain since when the leadership became aware of financial issues and withdrawal restrictions
👥 Clarify the responsibilities of those who made the decisions
💵 Pay overdue salaries and compensation to employees
🗓️ Disclose repayment plan: remaining asset size, total liabilities, the percentage of users who can recover funds, payment order, and timeline
🔍 Accept independent third-party auditing

Notably, the letter also requests clarification on certain accounts and companies related to users’ assets. However, allegations involving specific individuals have not been fully verified yet, so it is not possible to conclude that any law has been broken.

BitMart: “Trust us.”
Employees: “Cool. Show us the wallets.” 👀💀

This is the important point: it’s not automatically true that the exchange is insolvent just because withdrawals are restricted. But when employees themselves demand disclosure of reserves, liabilities, and the repayment plan, then on-chain transparency + independent auditing are exactly what the market needs to see.

If a CEX starts restricting withdrawals, what do you want to see first: Proof of Reserves, Proof of Liabilities, or an independent audit? 👀
#BrainrotCrypto #bitmart
BitMart: President denies audit request when users accuse funds being locked - Sheldon Lee denies the audit request, saying account X was hacked. - Users demand public disclosure of wallets, assets, and debts. - Complaints that funds are locked, and employees have not been paid. #BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #BitMart #Audit #CryptoExchange $btc $eth vlikevn Titanbot Source: CoinDesk
BitMart: President denies audit request when users accuse funds being locked

- Sheldon Lee denies the audit request, saying account X was hacked.
- Users demand public disclosure of wallets, assets, and debts.
- Complaints that funds are locked, and employees have not been paid.
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #BitMart #Audit #CryptoExchange

$btc $eth

vlikevn Titanbot

Source: CoinDesk
Alleged BitMart employee publicly holds management accountable; founder urgently responds, saying the account was hacked On August 17, an alleged BitMart employee published a public accountability statement through their official Chinese X account, issuing multiple serious demands to BitMart’s core management. Because the wording was relatively harsh and the stance was clear, the message spread rapidly across the community, sparking widespread discussion and speculation in the market about BitMart’s official position. The statement requires management to respond directly to key questions by August 19, including where users’ funds went, the reasons for restricted withdrawals, and the tracing of related funds. It also calls for an actionable user repayment plan and an employee salary payment方案. The statement emphasizes that if BitMart’s core management believes the accusations above stem from misunderstandings, they can respond one by one using public, verifiable evidence. However, the truth will not fear public and transparent follow-up questions. The statement further warns that if, by the deadline, there is still no complete, transparent, verifiable asset explanation and repayment plan, the existing materials and leads will be submitted to law enforcement agencies, regulators, lawyers, and the media in various places for further investigation. It also calls on the entire Web3 industry, the media, and relevant individuals to pay attention to and help promote an open and transparent investigation, in order to protect users’ and employees’ rights and maintain industry trust. This public accountability action directly prompted comments and a response from BitMart founder Sheldon. He claimed that BitMart’s Chinese official X account had been compromised and that the related content was not posted by current employees. In summary, this incident not only exposes potential internal management issues within BitMart and risks to fund security, but also serves as a warning to the industry about transparency and governance standards. Market participants are closely watching developments and awaiting further official clarification from the platform. #BitMart #Web3信任危机
Alleged BitMart employee publicly holds management accountable; founder urgently responds, saying the account was hacked

On August 17, an alleged BitMart employee published a public accountability statement through their official Chinese X account, issuing multiple serious demands to BitMart’s core management.

Because the wording was relatively harsh and the stance was clear, the message spread rapidly across the community, sparking widespread discussion and speculation in the market about BitMart’s official position.

The statement requires management to respond directly to key questions by August 19, including where users’ funds went, the reasons for restricted withdrawals, and the tracing of related funds. It also calls for an actionable user repayment plan and an employee salary payment方案.

The statement emphasizes that if BitMart’s core management believes the accusations above stem from misunderstandings, they can respond one by one using public, verifiable evidence. However, the truth will not fear public and transparent follow-up questions.

The statement further warns that if, by the deadline, there is still no complete, transparent, verifiable asset explanation and repayment plan, the existing materials and leads will be submitted to law enforcement agencies, regulators, lawyers, and the media in various places for further investigation.

It also calls on the entire Web3 industry, the media, and relevant individuals to pay attention to and help promote an open and transparent investigation, in order to protect users’ and employees’ rights and maintain industry trust.

This public accountability action directly prompted comments and a response from BitMart founder Sheldon. He claimed that BitMart’s Chinese official X account had been compromised and that the related content was not posted by current employees.

In summary, this incident not only exposes potential internal management issues within BitMart and risks to fund security, but also serves as a warning to the industry about transparency and governance standards. Market participants are closely watching developments and awaiting further official clarification from the platform.

#BitMart #Web3信任危机
好运兵:
bitmart真操蛋,毫无底线,暂停公告说的好让客户尽快提现,美其名曰为客户好,谁知提了不到账啊,都快一个月了也没有解决方案
BitMart demands the founder explain the fund; Xia calls it rumors - BitMart's Chinese account X asks for a debt repayment plan on 19/8 - Sheldon Xia calls the allegations of blocked withdrawals and unpaid wages a rumor fabricated #BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #BitMart $btc $eth #vlikevn #Titanbot Source: CoinTelegraph
BitMart demands the founder explain the fund; Xia calls it rumors

- BitMart's Chinese account X asks for a debt repayment plan on 19/8
- Sheldon Xia calls the allegations of blocked withdrawals and unpaid wages a rumor fabricated
#BinanceSquare #CryptoNews #BitMart

$btc $eth

#vlikevn #Titanbot

Source: CoinTelegraph
·
--
Didn’t expect that even BitMart’s official account would publicly seek redress Support the working people, support the customers Back then, the exchange was shut down in the blink of an eye That was a planned robbery of users’ assets Yesterday, I wrote about 125 projects that would die in the crypto industry in 26 years, and BitMart was the most well-known one At the time, my comment section already had content about pursuing compensation, and some users who were seeking redress also followed me—the coldness of the bear market had already spread to every corner Everyone, put your money in a safe place. Don’t chase high interest. Someone else may just be coveting your principal Under a bear market, all kinds of predators and wolves have finally shown their true faces @CZ Binance These old-school big exchanges—even if something goes wrong, it’s usually the last wave. Everyone should still choose reputable exchanges with strong brands and large scale. Small exchanges are now in shaky times, and it’s hard to guarantee safety #BitMart #Binance $BNB {future}(BNBUSDT)
Didn’t expect that even BitMart’s official account would publicly seek redress
Support the working people, support the customers

Back then, the exchange was shut down in the blink of an eye
That was a planned robbery of users’ assets

Yesterday, I wrote about 125 projects that would die in the crypto industry in 26 years, and BitMart was the most well-known one

At the time, my comment section already had content about pursuing compensation, and some users who were seeking redress also followed me—the coldness of the bear market had already spread to every corner

Everyone, put your money in a safe place. Don’t chase high interest. Someone else may just be coveting your principal

Under a bear market, all kinds of predators and wolves have finally shown their true faces

@CZ
Binance
These old-school big exchanges—even if something goes wrong, it’s usually the last wave. Everyone should still choose reputable exchanges with strong brands and large scale. Small exchanges are now in shaky times, and it’s hard to guarantee safety

#BitMart
#Binance
$BNB
Yuny:
那125个死亡项目半数倒在流动性上,大所小币也有插针风险,为此我连主流币都不轻易重仓,宁可只跑 低波动组合
BitMart officially challenges the founders, demanding that Sheldon and Li Yi publicly address five core issues by August 19. These issues include the whereabouts of users’ funds and proof of verifiable assets, the decision-making process behind withdrawal restrictions, an investigation into fund flows to and from related accounts, the settlement of employee salaries and compensation plans, and an enforceable user repayment plan that includes remaining assets, total liabilities, repayment ratios, and a timeline—along with a clear statement on whether they accept third-party audits. Currently, the platform still faces large-scale cases of withdrawals being blocked. Employee salaries and compensation have also yet to be fulfilled. If the founder team fails to provide complete and transparent explanations by the deadline, BitMart states it will submit the relevant materials to law enforcement authorities, regulatory bodies, partner lawyers, and the media to push for further investigations. Judging by the trajectory of the entire incident, user fund safety has become the most central point of conflict. Withdrawal functionality being restricted, combined with the founders’ long delay in providing credible proof of assets, is continuously eroding the remaining trust the platform has. For the cryptocurrency industry, once a centralized exchange fails in separating user assets and in information disclosure, the cost of rebuilding trust is far higher than the short-term gains from concealment. There are three key observation points for the next steps of the incident: first, whether the two founders will, by August 19, deliver verifiable on-chain proof of assets and a commitment to third-party auditing as scheduled; second, whether the funding issues of users and employees move into an enforceable repayment stage; and third, whether regulators or law enforcement begin to intervene. No matter the outcome, the issue of centralized platforms’ "reserve transparency" will once again be pushed to the center of industry discussion. #BitMart #交易所 #User fund safety
BitMart officially challenges the founders, demanding that Sheldon and Li Yi publicly address five core issues by August 19. These issues include the whereabouts of users’ funds and proof of verifiable assets, the decision-making process behind withdrawal restrictions, an investigation into fund flows to and from related accounts, the settlement of employee salaries and compensation plans, and an enforceable user repayment plan that includes remaining assets, total liabilities, repayment ratios, and a timeline—along with a clear statement on whether they accept third-party audits.

Currently, the platform still faces large-scale cases of withdrawals being blocked. Employee salaries and compensation have also yet to be fulfilled. If the founder team fails to provide complete and transparent explanations by the deadline, BitMart states it will submit the relevant materials to law enforcement authorities, regulatory bodies, partner lawyers, and the media to push for further investigations.

Judging by the trajectory of the entire incident, user fund safety has become the most central point of conflict. Withdrawal functionality being restricted, combined with the founders’ long delay in providing credible proof of assets, is continuously eroding the remaining trust the platform has. For the cryptocurrency industry, once a centralized exchange fails in separating user assets and in information disclosure, the cost of rebuilding trust is far higher than the short-term gains from concealment.

There are three key observation points for the next steps of the incident: first, whether the two founders will, by August 19, deliver verifiable on-chain proof of assets and a commitment to third-party auditing as scheduled; second, whether the funding issues of users and employees move into an enforceable repayment stage; and third, whether regulators or law enforcement begin to intervene. No matter the outcome, the issue of centralized platforms’ "reserve transparency" will once again be pushed to the center of industry discussion.

#BitMart #交易所 #User fund safety
BitMart Founder Publicly Faces Accountability On August 17, BitMart’s official account posted on X, demanding that founders Sheldon and Li Yi publicly respond to five key questions by August 19, including the whereabouts of user funds and verifiable proof of assets, the decision-making process behind withdrawal restrictions, an investigation into the flow of funds in related accounts, employees’ final salaries and compensation, and a concrete repayment plan containing remaining assets, total liabilities, repayment ratio, timeline, and a third-party audit. At present, the platform still has many users unable to withdraw and employees who have not received their final salaries and compensation. BitMart has made it clear that if a complete and transparent explanation is not provided by the deadline, it will submit relevant materials to law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, lawyers, and the media to push for further investigation. This public “final ultimatum” between the exchange and its founders is extremely rare. By applying pressure through public channels, BitMart indicates that internal communication has nearly broken down. The founders must either come up with a credible settlement and repayment plan or face multi-pronged pressure from regulators and the judiciary. For users, the three most important concerns remain: Is my money still there? When will I be able to get it back? Who can oversee this? These five questions are exactly what is being asked to address those three points. With only two days left until August 19, Sheldon and Li Yi’s response will determine whether BitMart can pursue self-rescue or ends up collapsing. #BitMart#ExchangeCrisis#UserRights
BitMart Founder Publicly Faces Accountability

On August 17, BitMart’s official account posted on X, demanding that founders Sheldon and Li Yi publicly respond to five key questions by August 19, including the whereabouts of user funds and verifiable proof of assets, the decision-making process behind withdrawal restrictions, an investigation into the flow of funds in related accounts, employees’ final salaries and compensation, and a concrete repayment plan containing remaining assets, total liabilities, repayment ratio, timeline, and a third-party audit.

At present, the platform still has many users unable to withdraw and employees who have not received their final salaries and compensation. BitMart has made it clear that if a complete and transparent explanation is not provided by the deadline, it will submit relevant materials to law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, lawyers, and the media to push for further investigation.

This public “final ultimatum” between the exchange and its founders is extremely rare. By applying pressure through public channels, BitMart indicates that internal communication has nearly broken down. The founders must either come up with a credible settlement and repayment plan or face multi-pronged pressure from regulators and the judiciary.

For users, the three most important concerns remain: Is my money still there? When will I be able to get it back? Who can oversee this? These five questions are exactly what is being asked to address those three points.

With only two days left until August 19, Sheldon and Li Yi’s response will determine whether BitMart can pursue self-rescue or ends up collapsing. #BitMart#ExchangeCrisis#UserRights
BitMart issued a statement on its official X account, publicly calling on the founders, Sheldon and Li Yi, to provide the community with formal responses to five key issues by August 19: 1) The specific destination of users’ funds and verifiable proof of assets; 2) The decision-making timeline for withdrawal restrictions and any internal knowledge; 3) The investigation results regarding linked accounts and suspicious fund flows; 4) The settlement plan for employees’ salaries and compensation; 5) A feasible user repayment plan, including the remaining asset size, total liabilities, repayment ratio, timetable, and whether independent third-party audits will be accepted. At present, many users still cannot make withdrawals normally, and both former and current employees have not received the final salary and compensation plans. In its statement, BitMart said that if the founder side fails to provide complete, transparent explanations and credible commitments by August 19, the platform will formally submit relevant materials to the relevant law enforcement agencies, regulators, law firms, and media, and request further investigation. By directly naming the founders, setting a clear deadline, and positioning “submitting to law enforcement and regulators” as the next step, this is no longer ordinary operational communication—it has pushed the issue into a stage that must be publicly held accountable. What users and employees need to focus on next is whether, around the August 19 deadline, the founders provide verifiable proof of assets, and whether the repayment plan involves third-party auditing—these will be the core signals for determining how the event unfolds. #BitMart#exchange#user funds
BitMart issued a statement on its official X account, publicly calling on the founders, Sheldon and Li Yi, to provide the community with formal responses to five key issues by August 19:

1) The specific destination of users’ funds and verifiable proof of assets;
2) The decision-making timeline for withdrawal restrictions and any internal knowledge;
3) The investigation results regarding linked accounts and suspicious fund flows;
4) The settlement plan for employees’ salaries and compensation;
5) A feasible user repayment plan, including the remaining asset size, total liabilities, repayment ratio, timetable, and whether independent third-party audits will be accepted.

At present, many users still cannot make withdrawals normally, and both former and current employees have not received the final salary and compensation plans. In its statement, BitMart said that if the founder side fails to provide complete, transparent explanations and credible commitments by August 19, the platform will formally submit relevant materials to the relevant law enforcement agencies, regulators, law firms, and media, and request further investigation.

By directly naming the founders, setting a clear deadline, and positioning “submitting to law enforcement and regulators” as the next step, this is no longer ordinary operational communication—it has pushed the issue into a stage that must be publicly held accountable. What users and employees need to focus on next is whether, around the August 19 deadline, the founders provide verifiable proof of assets, and whether the repayment plan involves third-party auditing—these will be the core signals for determining how the event unfolds.

#BitMart#exchange#user funds
BitMart publicly calls on its founder Sheldon along with Li Yi, demanding that by August 19 they provide formal responses to five core issues. The most closely watched, of course, is the specific whereabouts of users’ funds and verifiable proof of assets. When will the decision on withdrawal restrictions be made, who was informed, what are the related accounts and how did the funds flow, when will employees’ salaries and compensation be settled, and a truly executable user repayment plan—remaining assets, total liabilities, repayment ratios, timeline, whether they will accept third-party audits. Every item directly targets the platform’s current trust gap. Based on the current situation, large numbers of users are still unable to withdraw, and employees have not yet received their final salaries and compensation. The platform’s financial position is clearly not optimistic. BitMart has set a clear bottom line: if a complete and transparent explanation is not provided by the deadline, they will submit the relevant materials to law enforcement agencies, regulators, attorneys, and the media to push for further investigation. This means August 19 will be a critical milestone. If the founder’s response is vague, the platform will face real pressure from the regulatory and judicial authorities; if they choose a direct response and present genuine asset proof and an implementable repayment plan, it may be the only way to stop further erosion of trust. For users, the next few days are worth close attention. Once an exchange enters this stage of “public questioning,” it usually means internal communication has failed. After that, it will either be substantive rectification or a larger-scale bank run with regulatory intervention. In any case, the more transparent the information disclosure is, the more ordinary users can make timely judgments. #BitMart#exchange#user funds
BitMart publicly calls on its founder Sheldon along with Li Yi, demanding that by August 19 they provide formal responses to five core issues.

The most closely watched, of course, is the specific whereabouts of users’ funds and verifiable proof of assets. When will the decision on withdrawal restrictions be made, who was informed, what are the related accounts and how did the funds flow, when will employees’ salaries and compensation be settled, and a truly executable user repayment plan—remaining assets, total liabilities, repayment ratios, timeline, whether they will accept third-party audits. Every item directly targets the platform’s current trust gap.

Based on the current situation, large numbers of users are still unable to withdraw, and employees have not yet received their final salaries and compensation. The platform’s financial position is clearly not optimistic. BitMart has set a clear bottom line: if a complete and transparent explanation is not provided by the deadline, they will submit the relevant materials to law enforcement agencies, regulators, attorneys, and the media to push for further investigation.

This means August 19 will be a critical milestone. If the founder’s response is vague, the platform will face real pressure from the regulatory and judicial authorities; if they choose a direct response and present genuine asset proof and an implementable repayment plan, it may be the only way to stop further erosion of trust.

For users, the next few days are worth close attention. Once an exchange enters this stage of “public questioning,” it usually means internal communication has failed. After that, it will either be substantive rectification or a larger-scale bank run with regulatory intervention. In any case, the more transparent the information disclosure is, the more ordinary users can make timely judgments.

#BitMart#exchange#user funds
BitMart employees publicly demand: the platform must disclose its asset status and repayment plan by August 19. #BitMart #BTC
BitMart employees publicly demand: the platform must disclose its asset status and repayment plan by August 19.
#BitMart #BTC
BitMEX is shutting down, and BitMart looks even worse. Official timeline: all trading will stop at 01:00 UTC on August 26, and the platform’s business won’t be officially closed until January 31, 2027. It’s recommended to close positions first and submit withdrawal requests so they’re in before 05:00 UTC on 8/26. On-chain is even more glaring: Arkham has marked a BitMart wallet—around $102 million as of July 6, down to about $69 million by the 27th. The founder came out on 8/8 to deny the “running off,” but as of 8/12 they still haven’t turned over a verifiable reserves-plus-liabilities comparison. First, separate the issues: the shutdown announcement is a fact, and insolvency hasn’t been fully established yet. What people are watching is whether withdrawals can actually go out—i.e., whether they can be confirmed by hash. #BitMart #交易所关停 #withdrawal
BitMEX is shutting down, and BitMart looks even worse.

Official timeline: all trading will stop at 01:00 UTC on August 26, and the platform’s business won’t be officially closed until January 31, 2027. It’s recommended to close positions first and submit withdrawal requests so they’re in before 05:00 UTC on 8/26.

On-chain is even more glaring: Arkham has marked a BitMart wallet—around $102 million as of July 6, down to about $69 million by the 27th. The founder came out on 8/8 to deny the “running off,” but as of 8/12 they still haven’t turned over a verifiable reserves-plus-liabilities comparison.

First, separate the issues: the shutdown announcement is a fact, and insolvency hasn’t been fully established yet. What people are watching is whether withdrawals can actually go out—i.e., whether they can be confirmed by hash.

#BitMart #交易所关停 #withdrawal
⚡ Withdrawal impossible for users of platform #bitmart after the closure announcement 📉 Reserves dropped from $100 million to $4.6 million 💰 BitMart platform users find it difficult to withdraw their funds after the platform effectively announced its closure 🚨 The platform saw a sharp decline in the value of its reserves, falling from $100 million to $4.6 million
⚡ Withdrawal impossible for users of platform #bitmart after the closure announcement
📉 Reserves dropped from $100 million to $4.6 million
💰 BitMart platform users find it difficult to withdraw their funds after the platform effectively announced its closure
🚨 The platform saw a sharp decline in the value of its reserves, falling from $100 million to $4.6 million
⚡ The Cryptocurrency Market Is Affected by a New Scandal: BitMart Announces Bankruptcy 📈 After platform #bitmart announced its bankruptcy, funds belonging to OpenGradient are stuck on the platform and cannot be withdrawn due to liquidity issues. 💰 It is noticeable that the platform offered holders of digital currencies the chance to lock their assets on the platform a week before announcing its closure, in an attempt to attract liquidity. 🚨 These developments come in the context of previous efforts to calm cryptocurrency enthusiasts following announcements of the platform’s closure.
⚡ The Cryptocurrency Market Is Affected by a New Scandal: BitMart Announces Bankruptcy
📈 After platform #bitmart announced its bankruptcy, funds belonging to OpenGradient are stuck on the platform and cannot be withdrawn due to liquidity issues.
💰 It is noticeable that the platform offered holders of digital currencies the chance to lock their assets on the platform a week before announcing its closure, in an attempt to attract liquidity.
🚨 These developments come in the context of previous efforts to calm cryptocurrency enthusiasts following announcements of the platform’s closure.
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number