#fairengagement
fairengagement
47 views
2 Discussing
Hot
Latest
Why I Reported Binance’s Artificial Engagement Problem — And Why It Matters
Two months ago, I shared my feedback with Binance Customer Support and later received an “Accepted” notification.
But the race for likes and comments on campaign posts continued.
Why did I report it?
First, fairness. Some creators were sharing campaign links in social media groups and exchanging hundreds of likes and comments to gain more points. Meanwhile, creators with genuinely good content but smaller networks often struggled to reach the leaderboard.
Second, and more importantly, time.
Imagine sharing your campaign post and getting 100 comments. You then reply to those comments and visit those users’ profiles to like and comment on their posts.
This can easily turn into a 3–5 hour daily routine.
Why? Because it becomes an exchange:
“You engage with my post, I engage with yours.”
Instead of spending that time researching, writing, and improving content, creators can end up maintaining an engagement network simply to stay competitive.
That’s why I believe Binance’s recent action is a positive step.
Binance has announced that 27 accounts are ineligible for rewards, while hundreds have received warnings.
This doesn’t mean every creator with high engagement is doing something wrong. Genuine engagement is valuable and should always be encouraged.
The real problem is artificial and organized engagement exchanges that can give some creators an unfair advantage.
If we want Binance Square to become a fairer and more transparent platform, we should report such practices and continue sharing constructive feedback.
At the end of the day, good content should have a fair chance to win—not the creator with the biggest engagement network.
#BinanceSquare #FairEngagement #ContentCreators
@Binance Square Official @CZ
Two months ago, I shared my feedback with Binance Customer Support and later received an “Accepted” notification.
But the race for likes and comments on campaign posts continued.
Why did I report it?
First, fairness. Some creators were sharing campaign links in social media groups and exchanging hundreds of likes and comments to gain more points. Meanwhile, creators with genuinely good content but smaller networks often struggled to reach the leaderboard.
Second, and more importantly, time.
Imagine sharing your campaign post and getting 100 comments. You then reply to those comments and visit those users’ profiles to like and comment on their posts.
This can easily turn into a 3–5 hour daily routine.
Why? Because it becomes an exchange:
“You engage with my post, I engage with yours.”
Instead of spending that time researching, writing, and improving content, creators can end up maintaining an engagement network simply to stay competitive.
That’s why I believe Binance’s recent action is a positive step.
Binance has announced that 27 accounts are ineligible for rewards, while hundreds have received warnings.
This doesn’t mean every creator with high engagement is doing something wrong. Genuine engagement is valuable and should always be encouraged.
The real problem is artificial and organized engagement exchanges that can give some creators an unfair advantage.
If we want Binance Square to become a fairer and more transparent platform, we should report such practices and continue sharing constructive feedback.
At the end of the day, good content should have a fair chance to win—not the creator with the biggest engagement network.
#BinanceSquare #FairEngagement #ContentCreators
@Binance Square Official @CZ
Binance Square Official
·
--
Real conversation is what makes Binance Square worth being part of.
- Posting a high volume of repetitive, templated, AI-generated, or empty comments, far more than a normal user would, goes against our rules. In serious cases it can lead to losing monetization eligibility and being muted.
- The same goes for accounts that keep trading templated replies to fake engagement for points or rewards. It hurts your account health and reach, and serious cases can also lose monetization eligibility.
Based on the above, and since many of you have shared feedback about CreatorPad, we reviewed the award winners of the BABY CreatorPad. Here's what we found:
- 27 accounts were commenting at rates far beyond normal interaction. Their reward eligibility has been revoked, they've been flagged as a violation.
- 265 accounts were part of reciprocal spamming. They've been warned, and it's been noted on the account.
Binance Square is about real community interaction. We've added detection for meaningless comment spam, small-circle reciprocal commenting, and repeatedly asking others to leave comments. From this announcement on, it applies to all features and campaigns going forward, including the current CreatorPad campaigns. Anyone whose behavior falls into these patterns might lose reward eligibility.
Thank you to everyone who keeps creating with care. Let's keep the community fair, together.
We'd also like to hear from you. Drop your thoughts on CreatorPad and Binance Square in the comments — we'll pick 3 commenters to receive a reward red packet. Your honest feedback helps us make this better.
- Posting a high volume of repetitive, templated, AI-generated, or empty comments, far more than a normal user would, goes against our rules. In serious cases it can lead to losing monetization eligibility and being muted.
- The same goes for accounts that keep trading templated replies to fake engagement for points or rewards. It hurts your account health and reach, and serious cases can also lose monetization eligibility.
Based on the above, and since many of you have shared feedback about CreatorPad, we reviewed the award winners of the BABY CreatorPad. Here's what we found:
- 27 accounts were commenting at rates far beyond normal interaction. Their reward eligibility has been revoked, they've been flagged as a violation.
- 265 accounts were part of reciprocal spamming. They've been warned, and it's been noted on the account.
Binance Square is about real community interaction. We've added detection for meaningless comment spam, small-circle reciprocal commenting, and repeatedly asking others to leave comments. From this announcement on, it applies to all features and campaigns going forward, including the current CreatorPad campaigns. Anyone whose behavior falls into these patterns might lose reward eligibility.
Thank you to everyone who keeps creating with care. Let's keep the community fair, together.
We'd also like to hear from you. Drop your thoughts on CreatorPad and Binance Square in the comments — we'll pick 3 commenters to receive a reward red packet. Your honest feedback helps us make this better.
Log in to explore more content