#70
70
10,396 views
24 Discussing
Hot
Latest
$PI On today’s order book, what’s most worth watching isn’t the price itself, but the relationship between the price and liquidity. Supposedly, after a 97% drop from the ATH and with the market cap still ranking #70, capital should be rushing in to buy the dip—but over the past 30 days, trading volume has steadily shrunk from the surge on July 20 of 33.9M down to around 10M recently. Today’s 24-hour volume is only 9.97M, and the turnover rate has just barely crossed 1%. The price has rebounded slightly, but the volume hasn’t followed—more like a passive lift rather than active buying.
What really needs confirmation is this: in the past month, were those two volume spikes (29.5M on 7/14 and 33.9M on 7/20) the smart money’s tentative accumulation, or “temporary liquidity” created by market makers to absorb sell pressure? Judging from the subsequent downward trend, it seems more like the latter. Right now, the price is consolidating in a narrow range of $0.078–0.082. The 7-day and 30-day moving averages are still sloping downward, and the rebound resistance is around $0.085–0.09.
The risk is that if this level continues to consolidate on shrinking volume, the market could turn into an “ice pool” state with neither bids nor asks—then any unexpected news (such as a mainnet delay or rumors of unlocks) could trigger a sudden crash. On the other hand, only if there are consecutive days with trading volume above 20M and the price holds steady would it be worth discussing bottom formations.
The clues I’m seeing aren’t enough—are there any signs recently of team updates, on-chain transfers, or new exchange liquidity injections? If you’re also following $PI, feel free to add any on-chain or capital-flow information you have. The narrative is too vague right now and needs more concrete evidence.
What really needs confirmation is this: in the past month, were those two volume spikes (29.5M on 7/14 and 33.9M on 7/20) the smart money’s tentative accumulation, or “temporary liquidity” created by market makers to absorb sell pressure? Judging from the subsequent downward trend, it seems more like the latter. Right now, the price is consolidating in a narrow range of $0.078–0.082. The 7-day and 30-day moving averages are still sloping downward, and the rebound resistance is around $0.085–0.09.
The risk is that if this level continues to consolidate on shrinking volume, the market could turn into an “ice pool” state with neither bids nor asks—then any unexpected news (such as a mainnet delay or rumors of unlocks) could trigger a sudden crash. On the other hand, only if there are consecutive days with trading volume above 20M and the price holds steady would it be worth discussing bottom formations.
The clues I’m seeing aren’t enough—are there any signs recently of team updates, on-chain transfers, or new exchange liquidity injections? If you’re also following $PI, feel free to add any on-chain or capital-flow information you have. The narrative is too vague right now and needs more concrete evidence.
Learning Series (Intermediate Level) #70 : EMA vs SMA – Which Moving Average Should You Use?
If you've been analysing crypto charts for a while, you've probably come across two of the most common technical indicators: the Simple Moving Average (SMA) and the Exponential Moving Average (EMA). While both help identify trends, they react to price differently, making each suitable for different market conditions.
What is SMA?
The Simple Moving Average calculates the average closing price over a specific number of periods. Every data point has equal weight, making SMA smoother and less sensitive to short-term price fluctuations. This helps traders filter out market noise and identify the broader trend.
What is EMA?
The Exponential Moving Average also averages historical prices but gives greater weight to recent candles. Because of this, EMA responds much faster to price changes, making it popular among short-term traders and active crypto investors.
Key Differences
• SMA is slower and smoother.
• EMA reacts faster to recent market movements.
• SMA is better for identifying long-term trends.
• EMA is more useful for short-term momentum and early trend changes.
Which One is Better?
Neither is universally better—it depends on your trading style.
Swing and position traders often prefer the 50 SMA or 200 SMA to identify major trends. Day traders and scalpers frequently rely on the 9 EMA, 20 EMA, or 21 EMA because they provide quicker signals.
Many experienced traders combine both. For example, using the 200 SMA to determine the overall market direction while using the 20 EMA to fine-tune entries during pullbacks.
Important Reminder
Moving averages are lagging indicators because they are based on historical prices. They should never be used as the sole basis for entering or exiting a trade. Always confirm signals with price action, trading volume, support and resistance levels, and proper risk management. DOYR
If you've been analysing crypto charts for a while, you've probably come across two of the most common technical indicators: the Simple Moving Average (SMA) and the Exponential Moving Average (EMA). While both help identify trends, they react to price differently, making each suitable for different market conditions.
What is SMA?
The Simple Moving Average calculates the average closing price over a specific number of periods. Every data point has equal weight, making SMA smoother and less sensitive to short-term price fluctuations. This helps traders filter out market noise and identify the broader trend.
What is EMA?
The Exponential Moving Average also averages historical prices but gives greater weight to recent candles. Because of this, EMA responds much faster to price changes, making it popular among short-term traders and active crypto investors.
Key Differences
• SMA is slower and smoother.
• EMA reacts faster to recent market movements.
• SMA is better for identifying long-term trends.
• EMA is more useful for short-term momentum and early trend changes.
Which One is Better?
Neither is universally better—it depends on your trading style.
Swing and position traders often prefer the 50 SMA or 200 SMA to identify major trends. Day traders and scalpers frequently rely on the 9 EMA, 20 EMA, or 21 EMA because they provide quicker signals.
Many experienced traders combine both. For example, using the 200 SMA to determine the overall market direction while using the 20 EMA to fine-tune entries during pullbacks.
Important Reminder
Moving averages are lagging indicators because they are based on historical prices. They should never be used as the sole basis for entering or exiting a trade. Always confirm signals with price action, trading volume, support and resistance levels, and proper risk management. DOYR
We're excited to share the latest trending tokens 🚀. Our community is always looking for the next big thing, and we've got the inside scoop. We're tracking the top tokens on CoinGecko, including Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) and Shiba Inu (SHIB).
We're seeing some notable market cap rankings, with Shiba Inu (SHIB) at #29 and Pi Network (PI) at #70. Other tokens, like BitMart (BMX) and The Black Bull (ANSEM), are also making waves with their unique features 💡. We're also keeping an eye on Pons (PONS) and KAITO (KAITO), which are gaining traction.
We're confident that our community will find value in these trending tokens 📈. As we continue to monitor the market, we're expecting big things from these coins 💸.
$EUL , $DIA , $EUL
We're seeing some notable market cap rankings, with Shiba Inu (SHIB) at #29 and Pi Network (PI) at #70. Other tokens, like BitMart (BMX) and The Black Bull (ANSEM), are also making waves with their unique features 💡. We're also keeping an eye on Pons (PONS) and KAITO (KAITO), which are gaining traction.
We're confident that our community will find value in these trending tokens 📈. As we continue to monitor the market, we're expecting big things from these coins 💸.
$EUL , $DIA , $EUL
We're excited to share the latest trending tokens on CoinGecko 🚀. Our community is always looking for new opportunities to grow their portfolios. We've got our eyes on DeXe (DEXE) and Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), which are currently ranked #152 and #220 in market capitalization.
We're seeing some interesting movements in the market, with tokens like Zama (ZAMA) and LAB (LAB) also making waves. Pons (PONS) and Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) are other notable mentions, with market cap ranks of #626 and #114, respectively. Pi Network (PI) is also trending, with a market cap rank of #70 📈.
We're eager to see how these tokens will perform in the coming days 💡. Our community is ready to dive in and explore these new opportunities 📊.
$DEXE , $ACE , $DEXE
We're seeing some interesting movements in the market, with tokens like Zama (ZAMA) and LAB (LAB) also making waves. Pons (PONS) and Pudgy Penguins (PENGU) are other notable mentions, with market cap ranks of #626 and #114, respectively. Pi Network (PI) is also trending, with a market cap rank of #70 📈.
We're eager to see how these tokens will perform in the coming days 💡. Our community is ready to dive in and explore these new opportunities 📊.
$DEXE , $ACE , $DEXE
When many people see $PI’s market cap ranking at #70 and a 97% drop from ATH, their first reaction is, “Another zero coin that hits its peak right after a mainnet launch.” That judgment is half right—what it misses is that over the past month, it has actually been going through a clear structural deformation.
What really needs to be seen through is this: $PI fell 34% over 30 days, but rose 1.7% over just 7 days—this isn’t simple, gradual drifting downward. Take a look at the chart: after touching $0.077 on July 14, it surged on increasing volume for four consecutive days to $0.095. Daily trading volume jumped from the 7M level to 33M, then quickly fell back to 14M. This looks like organized buyers planned a deep pullback around $0.077—yet after pushing it to $0.095, there was no follow-through, so it retreated. Now it’s at $0.082, right around the midpoint of that volume spike.
So the question isn’t “can it rise back to $2,” but rather: in the $0.077–$0.095 range, is the liquidity being built up for a base, or is it being used to distribute and unload? Both bulls and bears can watch the same variable: daily trading volume. If $PI can regain momentum near $0.08 with renewed volume of 25M or more and the price holds steady, then $0.077 is likely to be a medium-term support. If it keeps shrinking volume below 12M, then this rebound is likely a Trap, and the next support is anyone’s guess.
Personally, I lean more toward the latter—not because I’m sure it must fall, but because the $14M liquidity corresponds to a $900M market cap. Participation is simply too thin, making it prone to sudden loss of momentum. At this level, does the volume–price relationship give you confidence, or does it make you more alert?
What really needs to be seen through is this: $PI fell 34% over 30 days, but rose 1.7% over just 7 days—this isn’t simple, gradual drifting downward. Take a look at the chart: after touching $0.077 on July 14, it surged on increasing volume for four consecutive days to $0.095. Daily trading volume jumped from the 7M level to 33M, then quickly fell back to 14M. This looks like organized buyers planned a deep pullback around $0.077—yet after pushing it to $0.095, there was no follow-through, so it retreated. Now it’s at $0.082, right around the midpoint of that volume spike.
So the question isn’t “can it rise back to $2,” but rather: in the $0.077–$0.095 range, is the liquidity being built up for a base, or is it being used to distribute and unload? Both bulls and bears can watch the same variable: daily trading volume. If $PI can regain momentum near $0.08 with renewed volume of 25M or more and the price holds steady, then $0.077 is likely to be a medium-term support. If it keeps shrinking volume below 12M, then this rebound is likely a Trap, and the next support is anyone’s guess.
Personally, I lean more toward the latter—not because I’m sure it must fall, but because the $14M liquidity corresponds to a $900M market cap. Participation is simply too thin, making it prone to sudden loss of momentum. At this level, does the volume–price relationship give you confidence, or does it make you more alert?
Partly True
↓3.9% - $FIL ’s 7-day bearish trend clashes with bullish funding rates
FIL’s 7-day bearish trend clashes with bullish funding rates - a hidden tension in on-chain leverage
You watched FIL drop 5.4% over 7 days, yet its funding rates turned positive. What's the leverage story here?
FIL is trading near $0.7356, showing signs of weakness.
At the same time, its open interest has risen 6.1% over the same period - suggesting that leverage hasn’t fully abandoned the asset.
—
Not financial advice. DYOR.
📌 Gainers Radar · #70 · #Gainers #CryptoSighted $FIL
FIL’s 7-day bearish trend clashes with bullish funding rates - a hidden tension in on-chain leverage
You watched FIL drop 5.4% over 7 days, yet its funding rates turned positive. What's the leverage story here?
FIL is trading near $0.7356, showing signs of weakness.
At the same time, its open interest has risen 6.1% over the same period - suggesting that leverage hasn’t fully abandoned the asset.
—
Not financial advice. DYOR.
📌 Gainers Radar · #70 · #Gainers #CryptoSighted $FIL
7 announcements in 7 days. No price move.
$BNB ’s calendar has been packed with new listings, futures expansions, and collateral additions - but the token itself hasn’t blinked.
The funding rate for BNB perpetuals has flipped negative, signaling short-side dominance, and open interest has stalled - not growing despite the news flow.
This isn’t just a quiet week. It’s a divergence.
If Binance’s expansion is supposed to drive demand, why hasn’t BNB responded?
Likely more chop near-term.
—
Not financial advice. DYOR.
📌 Announcements · #70 · #CryptoNews #CryptoSighted $BNB
$BNB ’s calendar has been packed with new listings, futures expansions, and collateral additions - but the token itself hasn’t blinked.
The funding rate for BNB perpetuals has flipped negative, signaling short-side dominance, and open interest has stalled - not growing despite the news flow.
This isn’t just a quiet week. It’s a divergence.
If Binance’s expansion is supposed to drive demand, why hasn’t BNB responded?
Likely more chop near-term.
—
Not financial advice. DYOR.
📌 Announcements · #70 · #CryptoNews #CryptoSighted $BNB
$POL Bullish, enter at market directly: 0.08478
TP1 above: 0.096769 (first take-profit)
TP2 above: 0.102164 (second take-profit)
DCA: 0.081813 (pullback/add-on observation level)
SL: 0.078845 (stop-loss exit)
POL heat is picking up—pushing to the hot search and market cap is at #70. But the key is whether the buy-side follows through. The funding rate is 0.0018%, not extreme. The long/short ratio is 1.5—there are more short accounts, so price can get squeezed upward against the shorts. This suggests the heat hasn’t fully converted into crowded longs yet. The 4H previous high has already been reclaimed—so you can add one more small position.
If it breaks below 0.078845, stop loss and exit immediately—don’t hold/ride it out.
TP1 above: 0.096769 (first take-profit)
TP2 above: 0.102164 (second take-profit)
DCA: 0.081813 (pullback/add-on observation level)
SL: 0.078845 (stop-loss exit)
POL heat is picking up—pushing to the hot search and market cap is at #70. But the key is whether the buy-side follows through. The funding rate is 0.0018%, not extreme. The long/short ratio is 1.5—there are more short accounts, so price can get squeezed upward against the shorts. This suggests the heat hasn’t fully converted into crowded longs yet. The 4H previous high has already been reclaimed—so you can add one more small position.
If it breaks below 0.078845, stop loss and exit immediately—don’t hold/ride it out.
We're excited to share the latest trending tokens with our community 🚀. Our top picks are based on data from CoinGecko, highlighting the most popular tokens in the market.
We're seeing significant interest in tokens like Pi Network (PI) and Lighter (LIT), with market cap ranks of #70 and #92 respectively. Other notable mentions include Cash Cat (CASHCAT) and Pudgy Penguins (PENGU), with market cap ranks of #227 and #117.
We believe these tokens are worth keeping an eye on, with Bitcoin (BTC) remaining at the top with a market cap rank of #1 💡. Our community is eager to learn more about these trending tokens, and we're happy to provide the latest updates 📊. We're looking forward to seeing how these tokens perform in the future 👍.
$PORTO , $DODO , $AKE
We're seeing significant interest in tokens like Pi Network (PI) and Lighter (LIT), with market cap ranks of #70 and #92 respectively. Other notable mentions include Cash Cat (CASHCAT) and Pudgy Penguins (PENGU), with market cap ranks of #227 and #117.
We believe these tokens are worth keeping an eye on, with Bitcoin (BTC) remaining at the top with a market cap rank of #1 💡. Our community is eager to learn more about these trending tokens, and we're happy to provide the latest updates 📊. We're looking forward to seeing how these tokens perform in the future 👍.
$PORTO , $DODO , $AKE
#71 LETS LEARN BEFORE TRADING 3
Continue from #70
3) MARKET MAKER MODELS 2
You will understand how they act and how to spot their moves before they even happen.
TRENDLINES
- Workout with Fibonachi, tool for many traders to identify market direction and plan entries.
- They appear clean, logical and reliable.
Picture 1
- The truth, Market Maker know how you use them.
And they use that knowledge to trap you.
- Ex: If the price touches the trendline again, I’ll enter..
Its a trending line break. I was wrong..when you buy
- Market Makers recognize this predictable behaviour.
- They see an opportunity to create a liquidity pool.
Picture 2
Result: The price break the trendline, stop loss is triggered. Its now become Liquidity Grab. After Market Makers collect enough all the Liquidity Grab, market continue DOWNTREND..
Picture 3
Summarized..
Please share to all Binancians and help them know the principles of trading. It can grow and save their assets..
Sharing is Caring
#TradingStrategies💼💰
#TradingShot
#TradingSignals💹💬
$BNB
$XRP
$SOL
Continue from #70
3) MARKET MAKER MODELS 2
You will understand how they act and how to spot their moves before they even happen.
TRENDLINES
- Workout with Fibonachi, tool for many traders to identify market direction and plan entries.
- They appear clean, logical and reliable.
Picture 1
- The truth, Market Maker know how you use them.
And they use that knowledge to trap you.
- Ex: If the price touches the trendline again, I’ll enter..
Its a trending line break. I was wrong..when you buy
- Market Makers recognize this predictable behaviour.
- They see an opportunity to create a liquidity pool.
Picture 2
Result: The price break the trendline, stop loss is triggered. Its now become Liquidity Grab. After Market Makers collect enough all the Liquidity Grab, market continue DOWNTREND..
Picture 3
Summarized..
Please share to all Binancians and help them know the principles of trading. It can grow and save their assets..
Sharing is Caring
#TradingStrategies💼💰
#TradingShot
#TradingSignals💹💬
$BNB
$XRP
$SOL
Log in to explore more content