35

Behind the 35% surge, are funds quietly pulling out?

FLOCK surged to 0.05546 today, with trading volume expanding to $158 million, making the bulls look strong. But on closer inspection, the funding rate is negative at -0.00354%, which means that although more traders are going long (57% longs), not many are actually willing to pay interest to hold those positions.

The trend over the past 8 hours was indeed strong, climbing from 0.037 all the way to a high of 0.065, before pulling back to around 0.055 now. This combination of price-volume divergence and a negative funding rate is often a sign of short-term overheating—be careful chasing the rally.

$FLOCK #资金费率背离 #35%
Click the small card below to quickly check the market👇

A 35% rise, but 60% of positions are still short — this is a classic short squeeze.

Lobster rallied from 0.071 to 0.099 today, with three consecutive bullish hourly candles, and the last one showed a clear increase in volume. Interestingly, despite the strong price action, the long/short ratio shows that 62% of traders are still holding short positions.

What does this mean? When most people are betting on a decline, any buying pressure can trigger a chain of liquidations. The funding rate of 0.07% is positive, indicating that longs are paying to hold positions, and market sentiment is shifting rapidly.

Key observation: if it breaks above the previous high of 0.102, short covering could accelerate the move higher. Conversely, if it falls back below 0.085, profit-taking by longs will create pressure.

$Lobster #轧空行情 #35%
Click the small card below to quickly check the market👇

60-SECOND ALPHA #35 | $XPIN

$XPIN is currently featured on Binance Alpha, and Binance has launched a dedicated trading competition for the token with a $200K reward pool. The first competition period runs from September 4 to September 11.

That creates an important lesson about market attention: campaigns and incentives can temporarily increase trading activity, but increased activity alone doesn’t prove long-term adoption.

Alpha: Volume can tell you where attention is. It cannot tell you whether that attention will last.

Behind the 35% surge, trading volume is the real signal.

RAYSOL has moved very steadily over the past 8 hours — starting from 0.89, peaking at 1.20, and now holding around 1.12. What stands out most is the volume: during the breakout, hourly volume surged to 17 million U, more than 10 times normal, showing this wasn’t an empty pump.

The funding rate is only 0.00027, and the long/short ratio is 56% to 44%, so sentiment isn’t extreme. This kind of post-breakout sideways consolidation is more worth watching than blindly chasing the rally.

The key is whether 1.10 can hold. If it does, the structure remains intact.

$RAYSOL #放量突破 #35%
Click the small card below to quickly check the market👇

35% increase, trading volume surged to 238 million, but the hourly chart has already closed three consecutive bearish candles.

$牛来 This rally was very strong, surging from 0.08 all the way to 0.14, and the bulls are indeed in control. However, looking closely, volume started to shrink as it pulled back at higher levels, with the price retreating from 0.14 to around 0.115.

Bulls account for 55%, which is not extremely crowded. The funding rate of 0.046% is also still within a reasonable range, with no overheating signal.

The key is whether it can hold the 0.115 level next. If it continues to decline on shrinking volume, it may retest around 0.10 in the short term to look for support; if it can stabilize, there is still a chance to test the previous high again.

Chasing the rally should be done with caution; waiting for a clear stabilization signal is safer.

$牛来 #Meme行情 #35%涨幅
Click the small card below to quickly view the market👇

A 35% increase, but the funding rate is negative?

FLOCK surged 35.61% today, with trading volume of $184 million, which looks strong. But looking closely, the funding rate is -0.006%, which means longs weren’t paying a premium—something rarely seen in a sharp rally.

Over the past 8 hours, the candlestick trend has actually been weakening, and the long-side share at 59% isn’t extreme either. This kind of situation—prices rising but funding not following—often signals that short-term momentum is running out.

I’m not saying it’s about to drop immediately, but this divergence is worth watching. Before chasing the move, ask yourself: if this is a temporary top, can I accept that?

$FLOCK #资金费率背离 #35%
Click the small card below to quickly check the market👇

Behind the 35% surge, short sellers may be getting squeezed into covering their positions.

USELESS rose 35.51% in the past 24 hours, with trading volume reaching 915 million USDT, but position data shows that 61% of traders are holding short positions. As the price keeps climbing, there are more shorts than longs—this kind of divergence often means shorts are being squeezed.

The hourly chart has posted three consecutive bullish candles, and there are no obvious signs of buying power fading. When most people are bearish but the price keeps rising, the market is speaking with real money.

$USELESS #空头挤压 #35%
Click the small card below to quickly view the market👇

$T This drop is a bit downright decisive. In just 15 minutes, it’s down -3.63%. Trading volume is amplified to nearly 10 times the usual level, and the price has also fallen below the lower bound of the range formed by about 20 five-minute K-lines. More importantly—OI is declining in tandem. The 15-minute contract’s notional position has shrunk by -277K, and the 1-hour position has also been shrinking. This combination of price falling plus position cutting isn’t a crash scenario conjured out of thin air; it looks more like longs are being forced into stop-losses and deleveraging.

Anomalous activity from across the whole pool has crowded into #35, with notional changes ranking at #25. Aggressive matching is down -14.6%, and the buy/sell ratio is 0.75. In the order book, the shorts haven’t held back either—it feels like they’re just pressing down relentlessly.

Anyone wondering whether you can buy the dip? For now, don’t treat the absence of a “violent rebound” as a fact yet. A decline on shrinking volume could mean panic-driven clearance, but it could also be the prelude to a weakening trend. Let the bullets fly for a little while longer.

$COLLECT This 15-minute move directly -2.29%. At the close, it even broke through the lower edge of nearly 20 five-minute K-bars 😬 Volume expanded 4x, Z-score 2.32—this isn’t ordinary slow bleeding; someone is actually dumping.

The key is the on-chain leverage data—hourly OI nominal change is -537K (-5.64%), but the 15-minute contract OI is slightly up instead. Combined with aggressive trade imbalance of -36.4% and a buy/sell ratio of only 0.47, the shorts are actively adding positions and driving it down. This is the classic “price falling, OI rising” pattern: it means newly added leveraged shorts are participating actively—not retail getting forced into passive liquidation.

The abnormal percentile across the whole pool is 96.6%, ranking 8th. The nominal change also surged into #35. This is an extreme signal confirmed across multiple cycles; it can’t be explained by just one or two isolated abnormal K-lines.

In 24 hours the order book is only 8.18M. With liquidity like this, capital moves with very high efficiency. The follow-through for the short-term direction needs to be taken seriously. $COLLECT is currently deviating from the near-range boundary. The short-side volume is still building momentum. Whether the next 15 minutes can reclaim above the moving average is crucial. If the bounce lacks strength, keep watching for further extension of the lower end of the range. If volume manages to engulf back upward, this kind of extreme short setup could also face a squeeze and counterattack. Discipline first—don’t rush to bottom-pick and don’t chase the order 📉

$SC 15m The price starts to change—first, verify spot trades.

Spot trades: 10.86M, Binance trade ranking #35. Spot trades are the current main clue; we’ll continue to track participation going forward.

Now, 24h gain/loss +52.41%; spread 0.22%. The cost pushed up is 13.9k, the cost pushed down is 14.5k. The first price move has already appeared; the second leg’s trades better indicate the persistence.

Next, watch whether trading volume stays consistent and whether the spread remains at the current level.

A 35% surge, followed by three consecutive bearish 1-hour candlesticks—this is today’s HEMI storyline.

The price jumped from a low of 0.0102 up to a peak of 0.016, a gain of roughly 57%, with trading volume exceeding 110 million USDT. Logically, such a move should inspire excitement, with the bulls sweeping the market.

But that’s not what’s happening.

The long/short ratio shows slightly more shorts: 52.4% of people are shorting, while 47.6% are going long. In other words, even though the price is still rising, more than half of the participants don’t believe this rally can continue.

Even more subtly, the last three 1-hour candlesticks are all bearish. The price is consolidating at high levels—each candle closes down, and the money is starting to diverge. Those who pushed higher in the short term are gradually exiting, but there are still new long positions coming in below, taking the other side.

The funding rate is 0.032%, slightly positive. This means contract longs are still paying shorts—which also suggests that market sentiment hasn’t fully flipped yet, but pressure is building.

In this kind of situation, I usually watch for two things: whether the trading volume is shrinking (a retreat in volume often comes before price pulls back), and whether price can hold around 0.0148.

I’m not being bearish—I’m just saying: after divergence at high levels, the direction is often more interesting than the rise or fall itself.

$HEMI #暴涨后高位分歧 #35%
Tap the small card below to quickly view the market trend 👇

Gained 35%, but there are more shorts instead—this is the strangest thing about UAI today.

By common sense, if a coin jumps nearly 35% in a single day, the majority should be longs. But the data now shows shorts account for 53%, while longs are only 47%—there are actually more people shorting than going long.

There are a few possibilities: first, after the main force pushes the price up, many retail traders reverse and short at high levels, thinking it has risen too fast and is due for a pullback; second, someone is using short positions to hedge their spot holdings, locking in profits; third, the market simply doesn’t trust this rally and believes the breakout is fake.

Let’s look at the candlesticks: the trading volume of the recent candles has clearly been shrinking—starting from 25 million lots for the first candle, gradually down to 7 million and 6 million, and the latest candle is only 1.77 million lots. The price has been consolidating above 0.38, but volume has kept ebbing.

The funding rate is 0.0329%, not extreme, which suggests the derivatives market isn’t overheated yet. Open interest is 26.55 million and hasn’t increased unusually fast.

This combination of “price rising while volume contracts + most people are short” usually points to two outcomes: either the main force hasn’t left yet and is preparing for another leg up; or the market is topping out and consolidating, waiting for a direction to emerge.

Next, the most worth watching is whether trading volume can expand again, and whether the short ratio starts to fall. If volume comes back, the direction will become clear.

$UAI #多空博弈 #35%暴涨
Click the small card below to quickly check the行情👇

2.8 billion in trading volume—this number made me stare for a few seconds.

Today, PROM’s low was 4.80, and then it directly broke through 7.16—an intraday K-line amplitude of over 49% in a single candle. This isn’t a normal rebound; it’s someone building a position at a rapid pace.

Look at that explosive-volume hourly K-line: the trading volume surged from 0.6 million to 10.85 million—17 times the previous candle. Usually, this kind of volume isn’t retail investors chasing in; retail doesn’t move like that.

But here’s the interesting part: after a 35% rise, the long/short ratio is still 43% longs versus 57% shorts. It suggests most people either don’t believe yet, or they’re already shorting this rally. The funding rate is also nearly zero—there are absolutely no signals of overheated longs.

So a contradiction forms: the price is rising, but most people are actually betting on it to fall back. If shorts get squeezed and forced to cover, there could be another push upward.

The following few K-lines show a pullback on shrinking volume, which indicates the breakout momentum is being digested. Only when price holds above 6.5 can we say the structure hasn’t broken.

I don’t know how far this move can go, but the volume–price alignment is worth continuing to watch.

$PROM #暴量拉升 #35%涨幅
Click the small card below to quickly check the quote👇

SUI is dropping in a rather interesting way—within 15 minutes it’s down -0.84%. But what’s really worth noting is that the futures open interest is quietly increasing.

The price is falling while OI is rising. This isn’t a normal pullback—someone is actively adding shorts. The executed deal slippage is -47.7%, and the buy/sell ratio has dropped to just 0.35. Large orders are basically one-sided, being hit down into sell pressure. On top of that, Binance Futures’ liquidation signals are concentrated toward the short side, suggesting this round isn’t just people getting trapped—it looks more like newly added leveraged funds are pushing it.

I checked the full-pool rankings: SUI’s notional change ranks #15, and the abnormality level ranks #35 in the whole pool. It’s not at the extreme end, but combined with the fact that the 5-minute liquidation agent has already seen $196K worth of sell-side release, short-term liquidity is shrinking quickly.

So, this selloff isn’t because nobody’s buying—it’s because someone is deliberately smashing it. OI is still climbing; if the price doesn’t get back up later, the short-side chips will keep stacking up. The next key is whether there will be a high-volume bullish candle for a rebound—if not, the probability of further downside is higher.

Don’t rush—wait for the direction.

56% of people are holding short positions on HEMI, but it’s up 35% today.

That’s the most interesting part of today.

HEMI’s long/short ratio today—there are more people shorting than going long, and more than half of open positions are for a downside move.

But the market doesn’t cooperate at all. It’s been pulled all the way from the low of 0.0083 to 0.0129, up a full 35%.

This situation has a professional term: “shorts squeezing longs.” Shorts are forced to cover, and the covering activity itself pushes the price up, creating positive feedback. Put simply: the more shorts there are, the more violently it can rally once it starts going up.

The volume isn’t small either. Today’s trading value is close to $250 million—this isn’t small-scale activity.

Three consecutive bullish candles, each one climbing higher. The bears still haven’t found a chance to push it down.

The question now is: how much of those 56% short positions have actually been covered? If there are still a lot of shorts not closed, the price may keep being pushed higher. If most shorts have basically been cleared out, the upward momentum will weaken.

The funding rate is currently still within a normal range—there’s no extreme sentiment. Within this move, the trend is still relatively healthy.

$HEMI #空逼多 #35% surge
Click the small card below to quickly check the market👇

A single candlestick shows trading volume skyrocketing 160x—this isn’t a normal pump.

$BEAMX climbed as much as 56% today, but just look at the candle structure to see what’s going on—
Before touching the high of 0.00219, there was an hourly candlestick where volume suddenly jumped from 50 million to 8.2 billion,
then the very next candle surged straight to 11.2 billion. In other words, within two hours, a huge amount of volume—massive chips—was absorbed.

The question is: after the pump, the bulls didn’t hold.

Now the long/short ratio is 51% with shorts holding the edge; three consecutive hourly candles closed bearish,
with price falling from the high of 0.00219 back to 0.00195—down roughly 11%.
The funding rate is still positive (0.005%), which suggests the bulls are still paying for this position,
but the trend has already started turning bearish.

This kind of move usually follows a common logic: large capital quickly lifts the price to attract FOMO buyers,
then exits while continuing to pump. The retail traders who chased in are now that batch of trapped chips at the top.

At the current level of 0.00195, the cost basis for those who bought high is around 0.002 or above.
Watch whether the bulls can defend this zone—if they can’t, it will mark the start of the next leg down.

$BEAMX #量价背离 #35% The truth after the explosive rally
Click the small card below to quickly check the market data👇

43% of people are going long, 57% are going short—this was originally a bearish setup.

But today, the lobster is up 35%. The opening price was 0.025, the intraday high surged to 0.048—nearly doubling.

The shorts are being “squeezed.” The funding rate has already climbed to 0.169%, meaning each time the shorts are settled, they have to pay an additional “penalty.” The longer it goes on, the more pressure builds.

Look at the candlesticks: those earlier big bullish candles were backed by real volume—at the peak, the highest single-candle成交量 exceeded 500 million. But recently, three consecutive hourly candles have closed bearish, and volume has been shrinking too. The uptrend is clearly catching its breath.

Open interest is 679 million, so the scale isn’t small, but there’s a major split between longs and shorts. In a setup like this, once someone can’t hold on, it can trigger a rapid stampede.

The question now isn’t “can it still go up,” but rather: for the people holding short positions at these elevated levels, when will they collectively give up?

That moment could bring a second wave of pulse—or it might just be a brief pump before continuing to fall.

Trading volume is key. If, during the rebound, volume can’t keep up with the prior peak, be careful.

$龙虾 #资金费率爆表 #35%暴涨背后
Click the small card below to quickly check the market 👇

The intuition that $SUI is doing doesn’t look like a bottoming process—it looks more like a brief catch of breath in a slow, downward drift. But this intuition needs two sets of data to confirm: the direction during high-volume periods, and whether the rebound can be supported by accompanying volume.

Over the past 30 days, $SUI has slid from $0.76 to $0.65, down 12.7%. The key date to watch is August 19: trading volume suddenly surged to $265M—double the usual $130M—but the direction still went downward. Price fell from $0.674 to $0.651. This doesn’t look like panic selling; it’s more like some level triggered passive sell orders, and the incoming buyers’ capital wasn’t decisive enough.

What further dampens my interest is the rebound quality. In the rebound to around $0.71, there was $205M in volume backing it, but by the time it reached around $0.69 there was only a little over $100M left. There are no signs of capital returning—the price is merely being propped up temporarily as selling pressure runs dry.

Down 87.69% from ATH, this number puts $SUI in an awkward position: yes, it is cheap—it has fallen nearly 90% from $5.35—but the one-year decline of -81.89% shows it has been trapped in a slow downward channel. With a market cap of $2.68B, it ranks #35—big enough to matter, but not so big that it can’t move. There’s no zero-to-one risk, and no reason for fresh capital to get excited.

My invalidation criteria are very clear: if, going forward, we see an upsurge in volume exceeding $250M, and the closing price is above $0.69, then the conclusion that this is a “downward drift continuation” would have to be overturned. Instead of rushing to pick a side, use that condition to test the order book. People who verify repeatedly around $0.65 will likely see the picture more clearly than those who rush into bottom-picking.

Sui ($SUI ) Gains Momentum Despite 24h Dip

Sui ($SUI ) is trending despite a 3.42% drop in the past 24 hours. The project's unique approach to blockchain scalability and its strong developer community are driving interest. With a market cap rank of #35 and a 24h volume of $133M, $SUI is attracting attention from both retail and institutional investors. The ecosystem's rapid development and partnerships are key factors. Keep an eye on community activity and upcoming updates. 📊💡

Follow for more crypto setups.

#HahaProfit #Sui

$NIL This move has something to it.

In just 15 minutes, it jumped 2%, and the volume reached more than 2.6 times the usual level. The closing price broke above the upper bound of the range from the past 20 five-minute candlesticks. This isn’t some weak, slow “bearish drift then rebound” kind of fakeout—there’s real buy-side conviction. Active trading volume is up 20.6%, and the bids are clearly tilted in a favorable direction.

More importantly, as the price rises, OI also goes up, which indicates new leveraged long positions are entering—not a short-lived行情 from short-covering. Even though the OI on the 1-hour timeframe dips slightly, the 15-minute contract notional change is +67K, and the directional alignment is still intact.

In terms of how abnormal the signals are, it ranks #35 across the whole pool. Both volume abnormality and notional change are in the top 50, and the order-depth confirmation checks out. Over the past 24 hours, turnover is 51M, and liquidity can hold.

In the short term, watch whether this breakout can hold. Just don’t chase the price higher.