Binance Square
Crypto.Andy
308 Публикации

Crypto.Andy

Top #1 Community Creator on CoinMarketCap according to CoinGape | Investor and trader | Listing & Institutional Services Partner of WhiteBIT | Affiliate & Listing Partner of BitUnix | Listing Partner of BitMart & MEXC
0 подписок(и/а)
3 подписчиков(а)
25 понравилось
Посты
·
--
См. перевод
TradFi at All-Time Highs, but What About $BTC ? 📈 While traditional markets are rallying - with the Dow Jones closing at a new record high and the S&P 500 sitting just 9 points away from its peak - $BTC is taking a more cautious approach, consolidating around the key $64,000 mark. Technical Outlook (BTC/USDT 4H WhiteBIT chart): BTC is currently testing the upper boundary of the Bollinger Bands near $64,345, attempting to break out of its recent range. Holding above the $63,350 middle band (20 SMA) is critical for buyers to maintain momentum toward higher resistance levels. RSI at ~56.33, the RSI points to a neutral-to-bullish momentum, leaving enough room for a potential local continuation without being overbought. $64k remains the battleground line: a clean consolidation above this level could ignite a local relief rally, while a rejection risks keeping BTC stuck in prolonged consolidation. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
TradFi at All-Time Highs, but What About $BTC ? 📈 While traditional markets are rallying - with the Dow Jones closing at a new record high and the S&P 500 sitting just 9 points away from its peak - $BTC is taking a more cautious approach, consolidating around the key $64,000 mark. Technical Outlook (BTC/USDT 4H WhiteBIT chart): BTC is currently testing the upper boundary of the Bollinger Bands near $64,345, attempting to break out of its recent range. Holding above the $63,350 middle band (20 SMA) is critical for buyers to maintain momentum toward higher resistance levels. RSI at ~56.33, the RSI points to a neutral-to-bullish momentum, leaving enough room for a potential local continuation without being overbought. $64k remains the battleground line: a clean consolidation above this level could ignite a local relief rally, while a rejection risks keeping BTC stuck in prolonged consolidation. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
См. перевод
The volume of tweets about $BTC and Ethereum is at a minimum. The last time such a calm was observed was before the 2021 bull run. #BTC Price Analysis#
The volume of tweets about $BTC and Ethereum is at a minimum. The last time such a calm was observed was before the 2021 bull run. #BTC Price Analysis#
См. перевод
42 Days to Hire 1 Dev: Is In-House Build Really Worth the Wait? A while ago, a founder friend told me his fintech app was racing a competitor to ship embedded crypto wallets. His plan: hire blockchain devs and spend 12 months building from scratch. I mentioned this to him back then, but - well, over the next few months, he ended up discovering it all firsthand. Time-to-Hire in crypto averages 42–60+ days, and over 70% of in-house IT projects miss deadlines or exceed budgets (BCG / Standish Group). To me, a much simpler and faster way could be leveraging an already existing infrastructure instead of building $BTC from scratch. It’s how the biggest names in fintech scaled in the first place. For example, Revolut & PayPal didn't build crypto custodians from day one - they initially launched crypto by integrating existing infrastructure partners (like Paxos). Integrating a solution like WhiteBIT’s WaaS via API could allow businesses to bypass the hiring bottleneck: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=waaass_andy&utm_campaign=post Generate deposit addresses across 340+ cryptos and 80+ networks, complete with automatic AML checks and multichain transfers. Infrastructure backed by Fireblocks integration, WAF attack protection, and 96% cold wallet storage. 4-step deployment process (KYB → API keys → Environment → Endpoints) that could convert a year-long hiring nightmare into a quick product launch. Ultimately, the market doesn't reward who built every line of infrastructure from scratch - it rewards who shipped first and solved the user's problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
42 Days to Hire 1 Dev: Is In-House Build Really Worth the Wait? A while ago, a founder friend told me his fintech app was racing a competitor to ship embedded crypto wallets. His plan: hire blockchain devs and spend 12 months building from scratch. I mentioned this to him back then, but - well, over the next few months, he ended up discovering it all firsthand. Time-to-Hire in crypto averages 42–60+ days, and over 70% of in-house IT projects miss deadlines or exceed budgets (BCG / Standish Group). To me, a much simpler and faster way could be leveraging an already existing infrastructure instead of building $BTC from scratch. It’s how the biggest names in fintech scaled in the first place. For example, Revolut & PayPal didn't build crypto custodians from day one - they initially launched crypto by integrating existing infrastructure partners (like Paxos). Integrating a solution like WhiteBIT’s WaaS via API could allow businesses to bypass the hiring bottleneck: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=waaass_andy&utm_campaign=post Generate deposit addresses across 340+ cryptos and 80+ networks, complete with automatic AML checks and multichain transfers. Infrastructure backed by Fireblocks integration, WAF attack protection, and 96% cold wallet storage. 4-step deployment process (KYB → API keys → Environment → Endpoints) that could convert a year-long hiring nightmare into a quick product launch. Ultimately, the market doesn't reward who built every line of infrastructure from scratch - it rewards who shipped first and solved the user's problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
См. перевод
42 Days to Hire 1 Dev: Is In-House Build Really Worth the Wait? A while ago, a founder friend told me his fintech app was racing a competitor to ship embedded crypto wallets. His plan: hire $BTC blockchain devs and spend 12 months building from scratch. I mentioned this to him back then, but - well, over the next few months, he ended up discovering it all firsthand. Time-to-Hire in crypto averages 42–60+ days, and over 70% of in-house IT projects miss deadlines or exceed budgets (BCG / Standish Group). To me, a much simpler and faster way could be leveraging an already existing infrastructure instead of building from scratch. It’s how the biggest names in fintech scaled in the first place. For example, Revolut & PayPal didn't build crypto $BTC custodians from day one - they initially launched crypto by integrating existing infrastructure partners (like Paxos). Integrating a ready-made solution like WhiteBIT’s Wallet-as-a-Service via API could allow businesses to bypass the hiring bottleneck: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=waaass_andy&utm_campaign=post - Generate deposit addresses across 340+ cryptos and 80+ networks, complete with automatic AML checks and multichain transfers. - Infrastructure backed by Fireblocks integration, WAF attack protection, and 96% cold wallet storage. - 4-step deployment process (KYB → API keys → Environment → Endpoints) that could convert a year-long hiring nightmare into a quick product launch. Ultimately, the market doesn't reward who built every line of infrastructure from scratch - it rewards who shipped first and solved the user's problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Macro Insights# #ad
42 Days to Hire 1 Dev: Is In-House Build Really Worth the Wait? A while ago, a founder friend told me his fintech app was racing a competitor to ship embedded crypto wallets. His plan: hire $BTC blockchain devs and spend 12 months building from scratch. I mentioned this to him back then, but - well, over the next few months, he ended up discovering it all firsthand. Time-to-Hire in crypto averages 42–60+ days, and over 70% of in-house IT projects miss deadlines or exceed budgets (BCG / Standish Group). To me, a much simpler and faster way could be leveraging an already existing infrastructure instead of building from scratch. It’s how the biggest names in fintech scaled in the first place. For example, Revolut & PayPal didn't build crypto $BTC custodians from day one - they initially launched crypto by integrating existing infrastructure partners (like Paxos). Integrating a ready-made solution like WhiteBIT’s Wallet-as-a-Service via API could allow businesses to bypass the hiring bottleneck: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=waaass_andy&utm_campaign=post - Generate deposit addresses across 340+ cryptos and 80+ networks, complete with automatic AML checks and multichain transfers. - Infrastructure backed by Fireblocks integration, WAF attack protection, and 96% cold wallet storage. - 4-step deployment process (KYB → API keys → Environment → Endpoints) that could convert a year-long hiring nightmare into a quick product launch. Ultimately, the market doesn't reward who built every line of infrastructure from scratch - it rewards who shipped first and solved the user's problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Macro Insights# #ad
См. перевод
Trump Media insists they aren’t selling, but the on-chain receipts tell quite a story 😅 Lookonchain caught TMTG moving another 2,628 $BTC (~$165 million) to an exchange, immediately triggering "potential dump" alerts across the market. Trump Media was quick to clarify that it’s just asset management and totally not a sale. Except we’ve heard this exact script before back in May when another 2,650 BTC took a trip to Crypto.соm. Meanwhile, the company's Bitcoin stash has quietly shrunk from 11,542 BTC down to 4,261 BTC over the last seven months. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
Trump Media insists they aren’t selling, but the on-chain receipts tell quite a story 😅 Lookonchain caught TMTG moving another 2,628 $BTC (~$165 million) to an exchange, immediately triggering "potential dump" alerts across the market. Trump Media was quick to clarify that it’s just asset management and totally not a sale. Except we’ve heard this exact script before back in May when another 2,650 BTC took a trip to Crypto.соm. Meanwhile, the company's Bitcoin stash has quietly shrunk from 11,542 BTC down to 4,261 BTC over the last seven months. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
См. перевод
Trump Media just officially dropped Truth API, charging Wall Street a casual $100,000 a month so algorithms can read Donald Trump’s posts a few milliseconds before the rest of us. 😁 Since one post about tariffs, $BTC , or oil can instantly wipe out or double a portfolio, they’re literally selling ultra-fast access to market volatility. So who’s setting up the community pool to buy a key or are we sticking to good old manually refreshing the feed and hoping for the best? #BTC Price Analysis# #TRUMP
Trump Media just officially dropped Truth API, charging Wall Street a casual $100,000 a month so algorithms can read Donald Trump’s posts a few milliseconds before the rest of us. 😁 Since one post about tariffs, $BTC , or oil can instantly wipe out or double a portfolio, they’re literally selling ultra-fast access to market volatility. So who’s setting up the community pool to buy a key or are we sticking to good old manually refreshing the feed and hoping for the best? #BTC Price Analysis# #TRUMP
См. перевод
🧩 42 Days to Hire 1 Dev: Is In-House Build Really Worth the Wait? A while ago, a founder friend told me his fintech app was racing a competitor to ship embedded crypto $BTC wallets. His plan: hire blockchain devs and spend 12 months building from scratch. I mentioned this to him back then, but - well, over the next few months, he ended up discovering it all firsthand. Time-to-Hire in crypto averages 42–60+ days, and over 70% of in-house IT projects miss deadlines or exceed budgets (BCG / Standish Group). To me, a much simpler and faster way could be leveraging an already existing infrastructure instead of building from scratch. It’s how the biggest names in fintech scaled in the first place. For example, Revolut & PayPal didn't build crypto custodians from day one - they initially launched crypto by integrating existing infrastructure partners (like Paxos). Integrating a ready-made solution like WhiteBIT’s Wallet-as-a-Service via API could allow businesses to bypass the hiring bottleneck: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=waaass_andy&utm_campaign=post - Generate deposit addresses across 340+ cryptos and 80+ networks, complete with automatic AML checks and multichain transfers. - Infrastructure backed by Fireblocks integration, WAF attack protection, and 96% cold wallet storage. - 4-step deployment process (KYB → API keys → Environment → Endpoints) that could convert a year-long hiring nightmare into a quick product launch. Ultimately, the market doesn't reward who built every line of infrastructure from scratch - it rewards who shipped first and solved the user's problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
🧩 42 Days to Hire 1 Dev: Is In-House Build Really Worth the Wait? A while ago, a founder friend told me his fintech app was racing a competitor to ship embedded crypto $BTC wallets. His plan: hire blockchain devs and spend 12 months building from scratch. I mentioned this to him back then, but - well, over the next few months, he ended up discovering it all firsthand. Time-to-Hire in crypto averages 42–60+ days, and over 70% of in-house IT projects miss deadlines or exceed budgets (BCG / Standish Group). To me, a much simpler and faster way could be leveraging an already existing infrastructure instead of building from scratch. It’s how the biggest names in fintech scaled in the first place. For example, Revolut & PayPal didn't build crypto custodians from day one - they initially launched crypto by integrating existing infrastructure partners (like Paxos). Integrating a ready-made solution like WhiteBIT’s Wallet-as-a-Service via API could allow businesses to bypass the hiring bottleneck: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=waaass_andy&utm_campaign=post - Generate deposit addresses across 340+ cryptos and 80+ networks, complete with automatic AML checks and multichain transfers. - Infrastructure backed by Fireblocks integration, WAF attack protection, and 96% cold wallet storage. - 4-step deployment process (KYB → API keys → Environment → Endpoints) that could convert a year-long hiring nightmare into a quick product launch. Ultimately, the market doesn't reward who built every line of infrastructure from scratch - it rewards who shipped first and solved the user's problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
См. перевод
August is starting off with a massive wave of supply hitting the market, according to the latest data from CryptoRank. With fresh tokens flowing into the market, keeping an eye on support levels and managing exposure is key. Are you tracking or holding any of these specific altcoins or are there only $BTC geeks in? 😁 #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
August is starting off with a massive wave of supply hitting the market, according to the latest data from CryptoRank. With fresh tokens flowing into the market, keeping an eye on support levels and managing exposure is key. Are you tracking or holding any of these specific altcoins or are there only $BTC geeks in? 😁 #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
См. перевод
📊 The 3 Pillars of Scalable Crypto-to-Fiat Infrastructure When adding crypto-to-fiat or fiat-to-crypto $BTC flows to your product, integration looks straightforward on paper. But for mid-size businesses and enterprise platforms, the wrong architectural or pricing choice quickly eats into operational margins. Before signing an API partner, here are the 3 critical questions your business needs to ask: 🟢 What is the real cost of percentages vs. fixed fees at volume? Onboarding pitch decks love advertising "low" transaction fees like 0.2%. It sounds negligible on microtransactions. However, a "low" 0.2% fee on a €100,000 SEPA transfer is €200 per transaction. Compare that to WhiteBIT’s On/Off Ramp, which charges a flat €5 per operation with daily limits up to €100,000 (scalable via KYB level). On high volume, €5 beats €200 every single time. https://institutional.whitebit.com/payments-for-businesses?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=ramponoff_andy&utm_campaign=post 🟢 What does time cost on this channel? 🟢 What does the channel cost downstream? When it comes to these two questions, one thing is clear: settlement latency and hidden externalities often cost businesses far more than the transaction fees themselves. By leveraging fully regulated KYC/AML processes and bank-grade security standards, WhiteBIT delivers audit-ready documentation and compresses exposure windows to a minimum - effectively pricing downstream operational friction down to approximately zero. 🟢 Setting up infrastructure? Focus on these 3 pillars: Fee structure at scale Settlement speed & limits Downstream compliance Don't let percentage models dictate your bottom line. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
📊 The 3 Pillars of Scalable Crypto-to-Fiat Infrastructure When adding crypto-to-fiat or fiat-to-crypto $BTC flows to your product, integration looks straightforward on paper. But for mid-size businesses and enterprise platforms, the wrong architectural or pricing choice quickly eats into operational margins. Before signing an API partner, here are the 3 critical questions your business needs to ask: 🟢 What is the real cost of percentages vs. fixed fees at volume? Onboarding pitch decks love advertising "low" transaction fees like 0.2%. It sounds negligible on microtransactions. However, a "low" 0.2% fee on a €100,000 SEPA transfer is €200 per transaction. Compare that to WhiteBIT’s On/Off Ramp, which charges a flat €5 per operation with daily limits up to €100,000 (scalable via KYB level). On high volume, €5 beats €200 every single time. https://institutional.whitebit.com/payments-for-businesses?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=ramponoff_andy&utm_campaign=post 🟢 What does time cost on this channel? 🟢 What does the channel cost downstream? When it comes to these two questions, one thing is clear: settlement latency and hidden externalities often cost businesses far more than the transaction fees themselves. By leveraging fully regulated KYC/AML processes and bank-grade security standards, WhiteBIT delivers audit-ready documentation and compresses exposure windows to a minimum - effectively pricing downstream operational friction down to approximately zero. 🟢 Setting up infrastructure? Focus on these 3 pillars: Fee structure at scale Settlement speed & limits Downstream compliance Don't let percentage models dictate your bottom line. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
См. перевод
$BTC locking in ~+10% and ETH pulling off a clean ~+20% for July... but for Strategy, Q2 wasn't quite as sunny 📉 They just reported an $8.33B net loss for Q2 - mostly due to unrealized paper losses on their Bitcoin portfolio. The quick breakdown: 📊 Total stash: sitting on 843,775 BTC (+25% YTD). 📊 Q2 accumulation: bought another 85,296 BTC during the quarter. 📊 CEO Phong Le noted that actual business risks only kick in if BTC crashes down to $8,000. While we celebrate green candles, Strategy is just casually absorbing an $8B paper drawdown. How did your July end up? Drop your wins below! #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
$BTC locking in ~+10% and ETH pulling off a clean ~+20% for July... but for Strategy, Q2 wasn't quite as sunny 📉 They just reported an $8.33B net loss for Q2 - mostly due to unrealized paper losses on their Bitcoin portfolio. The quick breakdown: 📊 Total stash: sitting on 843,775 BTC (+25% YTD). 📊 Q2 accumulation: bought another 85,296 BTC during the quarter. 📊 CEO Phong Le noted that actual business risks only kick in if BTC crashes down to $8,000. While we celebrate green candles, Strategy is just casually absorbing an $8B paper drawdown. How did your July end up? Drop your wins below! #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
См. перевод
42 Days to Hire 1 Dev: Is In-House Build Really Worth the Wait? A while ago, a founder friend told me his fintech app was racing a competitor to ship embedded crypto $BTC wallets. His plan: hire blockchain devs and spend 12 months building from scratch. I mentioned this to him back then, but - well, over the next few months, he ended up discovering it all firsthand. Time-to-Hire in crypto averages 42–60+ days, and over 70% of in-house IT projects miss deadlines or exceed budgets (BCG / Standish Group). To me, a much simpler and faster way could be leveraging an already existing infrastructure instead of building from scratch. It’s how the biggest names in fintech scaled in the first place. For example, Revolut & PayPal didn't build crypto custodians from day one - they initially launched crypto by integrating existing infrastructure partners (like Paxos). Integrating a ready-made solution like WhiteBIT’s Wallet-as-a-Service via API could allow businesses to bypass the hiring bottleneck: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=waaass_andy&utm_campaign=post ◾ Generate deposit addresses across 340+ cryptos and 80+ networks, complete with automatic AML checks and multichain transfers. ◾ Infrastructure backed by Fireblocks integration, WAF attack protection, and 96% cold wallet storage. ◾ 4-step deployment process (KYB → API keys → Environment → Endpoints) that could convert a year-long hiring nightmare into a quick product launch. Ultimately, the market doesn't reward who built every line of infrastructure from scratch - it rewards who shipped first and solved the user's problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
42 Days to Hire 1 Dev: Is In-House Build Really Worth the Wait? A while ago, a founder friend told me his fintech app was racing a competitor to ship embedded crypto $BTC wallets. His plan: hire blockchain devs and spend 12 months building from scratch. I mentioned this to him back then, but - well, over the next few months, he ended up discovering it all firsthand. Time-to-Hire in crypto averages 42–60+ days, and over 70% of in-house IT projects miss deadlines or exceed budgets (BCG / Standish Group). To me, a much simpler and faster way could be leveraging an already existing infrastructure instead of building from scratch. It’s how the biggest names in fintech scaled in the first place. For example, Revolut & PayPal didn't build crypto custodians from day one - they initially launched crypto by integrating existing infrastructure partners (like Paxos). Integrating a ready-made solution like WhiteBIT’s Wallet-as-a-Service via API could allow businesses to bypass the hiring bottleneck: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=waaass_andy&utm_campaign=post ◾ Generate deposit addresses across 340+ cryptos and 80+ networks, complete with automatic AML checks and multichain transfers. ◾ Infrastructure backed by Fireblocks integration, WAF attack protection, and 96% cold wallet storage. ◾ 4-step deployment process (KYB → API keys → Environment → Endpoints) that could convert a year-long hiring nightmare into a quick product launch. Ultimately, the market doesn't reward who built every line of infrastructure from scratch - it rewards who shipped first and solved the user's problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
См. перевод
Monthly returns are nice, but let's look at the actual $BTC chart and recap what July was really about. After June slammed the market into red, July kicked off with a massive rally from the sub-60k range straight to local highs near 67k, before settling into a volatile range around 63.5k to close out the month at plus 9.12 percent. Beyond the price action, July delivered huge fundamental moves including Strategy absorbing an 8.2 billion dollar paper loss while locking in a 3.75 billion dollar fiat cushion, Visa expanding its stablecoin stack with Pismo, European banking giants launching the RL1 network, and Emirates starting to accept crypto for flight bookings. We are closing July in the green, but if we look at the BTC USDT 4H chart on WhiteBIT right now, price is testing the lower Bollinger Band near 63.3k with RSI cooling off under 40, showing that local volatility is definitely not over yet. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
Monthly returns are nice, but let's look at the actual $BTC chart and recap what July was really about. After June slammed the market into red, July kicked off with a massive rally from the sub-60k range straight to local highs near 67k, before settling into a volatile range around 63.5k to close out the month at plus 9.12 percent. Beyond the price action, July delivered huge fundamental moves including Strategy absorbing an 8.2 billion dollar paper loss while locking in a 3.75 billion dollar fiat cushion, Visa expanding its stablecoin stack with Pismo, European banking giants launching the RL1 network, and Emirates starting to accept crypto for flight bookings. We are closing July in the green, but if we look at the BTC USDT 4H chart on WhiteBIT right now, price is testing the lower Bollinger Band near 63.3k with RSI cooling off under 40, showing that local volatility is definitely not over yet. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
А что с $ETH? Что ж, +20% в такие времена ощущаются как абсолютная роскошь! 💎 Ethereum фиксирует уверенный рост на +20.17% за июль. После того как его прилично прижали в июне (-21.70%), ETH вернулся с размахом — практически одним движением стер падение прошлого месяца. Он даже удвоил свою историческую среднюю доходность за июль (+10.79%). Кто всё ещё держит, а кто урезал по пути вверх? Пишите свои ставки ниже! 🚀 #BTC Price Analysis# #ETHBlockchain
А что с $ETH? Что ж, +20% в такие времена ощущаются как абсолютная роскошь! 💎 Ethereum фиксирует уверенный рост на +20.17% за июль. После того как его прилично прижали в июне (-21.70%), ETH вернулся с размахом — практически одним движением стер падение прошлого месяца. Он даже удвоил свою историческую среднюю доходность за июль (+10.79%). Кто всё ещё держит, а кто урезал по пути вверх? Пишите свои ставки ниже! 🚀 #BTC Price Analysis# #ETHBlockchain
См. перевод
Well well well… what do we have here? 👀 Finally a green month! 🟢 $BTC is closing July at +9.12%. After that pull-back in June (-20.48%), the market decided to catch its breath. Historically July tends to deliver (average +7.71%) and seasonal stats didn't disappoint this time either. August is up next and historically it can be a bit bumpy. Let's see if the bulls can keep this momentum going. How are your bags doing? 🚀 #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
Well well well… what do we have here? 👀 Finally a green month! 🟢 $BTC is closing July at +9.12%. After that pull-back in June (-20.48%), the market decided to catch its breath. Historically July tends to deliver (average +7.71%) and seasonal stats didn't disappoint this time either. August is up next and historically it can be a bit bumpy. Let's see if the bulls can keep this momentum going. How are your bags doing? 🚀 #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
См. перевод
The $BTC On/Off-Ramp Question Every Business Should Ask $BTC may be easy to sell in small amounts, but once a business converts five or six figures into EUR each month, the off-ramp route becomes an operational decision. 🤔 P2P, exchangers, consumer apps, and institutional rails may look similar. At scale, they create different costs, risks, and banking footprints. Before choosing a standing route, answer these 3 questions: 👇 What does one conversion really cost? 💶 The total includes fees, spread, P2P premiums, and time spent splitting transactions. A low headline fee may still hide an expensive process. Who is your counterparty? 🛡️ With P2P, every deal may introduce a new person, payment method, and failure scenario. That becomes harder to manage when the fiat leg is €40,000 instead of €400. What does the receiving bank see? 🏦 Transfers from unrelated senders may create source-of-funds questions and compliance work. Consistent, documented flows could make recurring conversions easier to explain. This is where WhiteBIT On/Off-Ramp could help. Businesses could gain a fixed €5 fee, 90+ EUR pairs, SEPA settlement, and transactions up to €100,000. This could reduce fragmentation and create a clearer route between crypto and fiat. https://institutional.whitebit.com/payments-for-businesses?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=cryananrampoffon&utm_campaign=post Score the route across cost, counterparty risk, and bank visibility. Institutional rails could suit businesses that cannot move large amounts reliably through P2P. The setup should support scale before volume becomes a problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
The $BTC On/Off-Ramp Question Every Business Should Ask $BTC may be easy to sell in small amounts, but once a business converts five or six figures into EUR each month, the off-ramp route becomes an operational decision. 🤔 P2P, exchangers, consumer apps, and institutional rails may look similar. At scale, they create different costs, risks, and banking footprints. Before choosing a standing route, answer these 3 questions: 👇 What does one conversion really cost? 💶 The total includes fees, spread, P2P premiums, and time spent splitting transactions. A low headline fee may still hide an expensive process. Who is your counterparty? 🛡️ With P2P, every deal may introduce a new person, payment method, and failure scenario. That becomes harder to manage when the fiat leg is €40,000 instead of €400. What does the receiving bank see? 🏦 Transfers from unrelated senders may create source-of-funds questions and compliance work. Consistent, documented flows could make recurring conversions easier to explain. This is where WhiteBIT On/Off-Ramp could help. Businesses could gain a fixed €5 fee, 90+ EUR pairs, SEPA settlement, and transactions up to €100,000. This could reduce fragmentation and create a clearer route between crypto and fiat. https://institutional.whitebit.com/payments-for-businesses?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=cryananrampoffon&utm_campaign=post Score the route across cost, counterparty risk, and bank visibility. Institutional rails could suit businesses that cannot move large amounts reliably through P2P. The setup should support scale before volume becomes a problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
См. перевод
The $BTC On/Off-Ramp Question Every Business Should Ask $BTC may be easy to sell in small amounts, but once a business converts five or six figures into EUR each month, the off-ramp route becomes an operational decision. 🤔 P2P, exchangers, consumer apps, and institutional rails may look similar. At scale, they create different costs, risks, and banking footprints. Before choosing a standing route, answer these 3 questions: 👇 What does one conversion really cost? The total includes fees, spread, P2P premiums, and time spent splitting transactions. A low headline fee may still hide an expensive process. Who is your counterparty? With P2P, every deal may introduce a new person, payment method, and failure scenario. That becomes harder to manage when the fiat leg is €40,000 instead of €400. What does the receiving bank see? Transfers from unrelated senders may create source-of-funds questions and compliance work. Consistent, documented flows could make recurring conversions easier to explain. This is where WhiteBIT On/Off-Ramp could help. Businesses could gain a fixed €5 fee, 90+ EUR pairs, SEPA settlement, and transactions up to €100,000. This could reduce fragmentation and create a clearer route between crypto and fiat.https://institutional.whitebit.com/payments-for-businesses?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=cryananrampoffon&utm_campaign=post Score the route across cost, counterparty risk, and bank visibility. Institutional rails could suit businesses that cannot move large amounts reliably through P2P. The setup should support scale before volume becomes a problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #Ad
The $BTC On/Off-Ramp Question Every Business Should Ask $BTC may be easy to sell in small amounts, but once a business converts five or six figures into EUR each month, the off-ramp route becomes an operational decision. 🤔 P2P, exchangers, consumer apps, and institutional rails may look similar. At scale, they create different costs, risks, and banking footprints. Before choosing a standing route, answer these 3 questions: 👇 What does one conversion really cost? The total includes fees, spread, P2P premiums, and time spent splitting transactions. A low headline fee may still hide an expensive process. Who is your counterparty? With P2P, every deal may introduce a new person, payment method, and failure scenario. That becomes harder to manage when the fiat leg is €40,000 instead of €400. What does the receiving bank see? Transfers from unrelated senders may create source-of-funds questions and compliance work. Consistent, documented flows could make recurring conversions easier to explain. This is where WhiteBIT On/Off-Ramp could help. Businesses could gain a fixed €5 fee, 90+ EUR pairs, SEPA settlement, and transactions up to €100,000. This could reduce fragmentation and create a clearer route between crypto and fiat.https://institutional.whitebit.com/payments-for-businesses?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=cryananrampoffon&utm_campaign=post Score the route across cost, counterparty risk, and bank visibility. Institutional rails could suit businesses that cannot move large amounts reliably through P2P. The setup should support scale before volume becomes a problem. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #Ad
См. перевод
🚀 Ethereum Institutional Closes Seed Round & Assembles 100+ Partner Coalition Non-profit organization Ethereum Institutional - dedicated to driving $ETH adoption among banks, funds, and traditional finance institutions - has officially closed its seed funding round and formed a strategic coalition of over 100 ecosystem partners. Key highlights: 📊 Backed by Bitmine, SharpLink, as well as Ethereum co-founders Joseph Lubin and Mihai Alisie. 📊 Partners include heavyweights like Circle, Chainlink, Aave, Uniswap, ConsenSys, Fireblocks, Ledger, Bitwise, Arbitrum, Optimism, and many more. 📊 The initiative already engages with over 500 institutional entities. 📊 Its flagship Institutional Ethereum Forum gathered 150 financial executives managing an estimated $250 trillion in assets under management (AUM). This milestone signals a structural push toward accelerating institutional-grade adoption, compliance frameworks, and infrastructure on Ethereum. #ETHBlockchain #ETH
🚀 Ethereum Institutional Closes Seed Round & Assembles 100+ Partner Coalition Non-profit organization Ethereum Institutional - dedicated to driving $ETH adoption among banks, funds, and traditional finance institutions - has officially closed its seed funding round and formed a strategic coalition of over 100 ecosystem partners. Key highlights: 📊 Backed by Bitmine, SharpLink, as well as Ethereum co-founders Joseph Lubin and Mihai Alisie. 📊 Partners include heavyweights like Circle, Chainlink, Aave, Uniswap, ConsenSys, Fireblocks, Ledger, Bitwise, Arbitrum, Optimism, and many more. 📊 The initiative already engages with over 500 institutional entities. 📊 Its flagship Institutional Ethereum Forum gathered 150 financial executives managing an estimated $250 trillion in assets under management (AUM). This milestone signals a structural push toward accelerating institutional-grade adoption, compliance frameworks, and infrastructure on Ethereum. #ETHBlockchain #ETH
См. перевод
10 major European banks have just launched a shared blockchain network. The new initiative, Regulated Layer One (RL1), is backed by institutions including ABN AMRO, DekaBank, DZ BANK, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale, LBBW, Natixis CIB, and others. The goal is simple: build a shared, regulated blockchain infrastructure for tokenized assets, digital money, $BTC and next-generation financial services. What's interesting is the structure. RL1 isn't owned by a single company. It's organized as a cooperative, giving participating institutions shared governance over the network. To me, this is another sign that Europe's blockchain strategy is shifting from experimentation to infrastructure. Instead of every bank building its own blockchain, they're starting to build one together. That's probably where the next wave of institutional adoption begins. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
10 major European banks have just launched a shared blockchain network. The new initiative, Regulated Layer One (RL1), is backed by institutions including ABN AMRO, DekaBank, DZ BANK, Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale, LBBW, Natixis CIB, and others. The goal is simple: build a shared, regulated blockchain infrastructure for tokenized assets, digital money, $BTC and next-generation financial services. What's interesting is the structure. RL1 isn't owned by a single company. It's organized as a cooperative, giving participating institutions shared governance over the network. To me, this is another sign that Europe's blockchain strategy is shifting from experimentation to infrastructure. Instead of every bank building its own blockchain, they're starting to build one together. That's probably where the next wave of institutional adoption begins. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
См. перевод
👀 The Lobby Effect: Why Your Users Open Your App Only To Leave It 84% of crypto investors say they would prefer to buy and hold crypto like $BTC directly through their primary bank, according to a Visa Global Study. So why are so many fintech apps still acting as a "lobby" for someone else's product? The hidden cost of each such exit is much higher than it seems, because over time, the service where a person holds the majority of their assets becomes their primary one. Around 35% of crypto owners indicated that they are ready to switch their primary bank to a competitor that offers embedded crypto tools. And this statistic becomes useful when a business owner says, "Our clients don't need crypto." But it turns out they are simply fulfilling this need in another app. If demand isn't the blocker, high dev costs usually are - at least when building from scratch. Another way could be integrating an already existing infrastructure, such as the one offered by WhiteBIT Crypto-as-a-Service. A white-label integration could allow businesses to embed turnkey crypto features under their own brand: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-as-a-service?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=caass_andy&utm_campaign=post 🧩 Wallet generation for 340+ assets across 80+ networks, with 96% secured in cold storage. 🧩 Built-in VASP authorizations to handle compliance heavy lifting. 🧩 Go live via API in weeks rather than spending years on in-house builds. By giving users in-app crypto capabilities, the lobby could become the final destination again. Exits could turn into sessions, and sessions - into AUM growth. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
👀 The Lobby Effect: Why Your Users Open Your App Only To Leave It 84% of crypto investors say they would prefer to buy and hold crypto like $BTC directly through their primary bank, according to a Visa Global Study. So why are so many fintech apps still acting as a "lobby" for someone else's product? The hidden cost of each such exit is much higher than it seems, because over time, the service where a person holds the majority of their assets becomes their primary one. Around 35% of crypto owners indicated that they are ready to switch their primary bank to a competitor that offers embedded crypto tools. And this statistic becomes useful when a business owner says, "Our clients don't need crypto." But it turns out they are simply fulfilling this need in another app. If demand isn't the blocker, high dev costs usually are - at least when building from scratch. Another way could be integrating an already existing infrastructure, such as the one offered by WhiteBIT Crypto-as-a-Service. A white-label integration could allow businesses to embed turnkey crypto features under their own brand: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-as-a-service?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=caass_andy&utm_campaign=post 🧩 Wallet generation for 340+ assets across 80+ networks, with 96% secured in cold storage. 🧩 Built-in VASP authorizations to handle compliance heavy lifting. 🧩 Go live via API in weeks rather than spending years on in-house builds. By giving users in-app crypto capabilities, the lobby could become the final destination again. Exits could turn into sessions, and sessions - into AUM growth. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. Do your own research before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #ad
Meta и BlackRock объявили о партнерстве на $14 млрд для разработки масштабного кампуса ИИ-ЦОДов в Техасе. Вместо того чтобы полностью финансировать проект самостоятельно, Meta привлекает внешний капитал. Вот как устроена сделка: • Под управлением BlackRock фонды будут владеть 80% предприятия. • Meta сохранит оставшиеся 20%. • Инвестиции BlackRock будут обеспечены за счет $12,5 млрд заемных средств. • Meta вносит земельные и строительные активы, одновременно обеспечивая долгосрочный доступ к вычислительным мощностям через лизинговые соглашения. Такая структура позволяет Meta продолжать наращивать свою инфраструктуру ИИ, не размещая весь проект целиком на своем балансе. Для меня это одна из самых интересных частей истории. Инфраструктура для ИИ становится настолько капиталоемкой, что даже компании с сотнями миллиардов долларов наличными все чаще начинают партнериться с финансовыми институтами вместо того, чтобы финансировать все в одиночку. По мере роста спроса на ИИ дата-центры могут стать одним из самых ценных классов активов десятилетия. Как вы думаете, больше компаний Big Tech $BTC начнут использовать эту модель финансирования для инфраструктуры ИИ? #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
Meta и BlackRock объявили о партнерстве на $14 млрд для разработки масштабного кампуса ИИ-ЦОДов в Техасе. Вместо того чтобы полностью финансировать проект самостоятельно, Meta привлекает внешний капитал. Вот как устроена сделка: • Под управлением BlackRock фонды будут владеть 80% предприятия. • Meta сохранит оставшиеся 20%. • Инвестиции BlackRock будут обеспечены за счет $12,5 млрд заемных средств. • Meta вносит земельные и строительные активы, одновременно обеспечивая долгосрочный доступ к вычислительным мощностям через лизинговые соглашения. Такая структура позволяет Meta продолжать наращивать свою инфраструктуру ИИ, не размещая весь проект целиком на своем балансе. Для меня это одна из самых интересных частей истории. Инфраструктура для ИИ становится настолько капиталоемкой, что даже компании с сотнями миллиардов долларов наличными все чаще начинают партнериться с финансовыми институтами вместо того, чтобы финансировать все в одиночку. По мере роста спроса на ИИ дата-центры могут стать одним из самых ценных классов активов десятилетия. Как вы думаете, больше компаний Big Tech $BTC начнут использовать эту модель финансирования для инфраструктуры ИИ? #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#
Войдите, чтобы посмотреть больше материала
Присоединяйтесь к пользователям криптовалют по всему миру на Binance Square
⚡️ Получайте новейшую и полезную информацию о криптоактивах.
💬 Нам доверяет крупнейшая в мире криптобиржа.
👍 Получите достоверные аналитические данные от верифицированных создателей контента.
Эл. почта/номер телефона
Структура веб-страницы
Настройки cookie
Правила и условия платформы