Zavian Era
8.4k Публикации
Zavian Era
Since 2018 | Full time Crypto Trader & Analyst | NVD Manager | Web3 Researcher
8.4K+ подписок(и/а)
18.7K+ подписчиков(а)
34.2K+ понравилось
Посты
Портфель
Все
Цитирования
Видео
Активно
PINNED
🚨 RED PACKET GIVEAWAY! 🎁
💰 Claim your crypto reward now!
👉 To Enter: Follow & Repost (RT).
👇 Drop your comment (ERA) the comments!
🔥 Don't miss out—claim yours before it runs out!
$BTC
💰 Claim your crypto reward now!
👉 To Enter: Follow & Repost (RT).
👇 Drop your comment (ERA) the comments!
🔥 Don't miss out—claim yours before it runs out!
$BTC
Most people focus on whether a chain is private or not. I usually pay attention to who gets to choose.
Reading through @Dusk documentation on Phoenix and Moonlight, what stood out wasn't the existence of two transaction models plenty of chains claim optional privacy it was the framing. Phoenix handles shielded, confidential transfers. Moonlight handles transparent ones, closer to a standard account-based model. The choice of which to use sits with the participant, not the protocol. That's a small design decision with a large implication: privacy becomes a setting, not a default posture the whole network has to defend or apologize for.
Another point I hadn't considered until I sat with it: a regulated entity doesn't actually want blanket anonymity. It wants to prove compliance without exposing counterparties or balances to the public ledger. If a transaction needs to demonstrate that funds are clean or that a threshold wasn't breached, without revealing the underlying amounts, the system leans on selective disclosure through zero-knowledge proofs rather than on hiding everything or showing everything. That's a narrower claim than "private," and a more useful one for the audience DUSK is actually building for.
The caveat worth stating plainly: this is a transaction-layer design, not a regulatory approval. Having the technical capacity for auditable confidentiality doesn't mean every jurisdiction recognizes it, and it doesn't substitute for the compliance layer being built on top. It's infrastructure for that conversation, not the conclusion of it.
Zoomed out, this is where I think DUSK's actual bet is: that regulated DeFi doesn't get built by choosing between permissioned and permissionless, or between private and transparent, but by making both selectable at the transaction level. Tokenized securities and RWAs need exactly this kind of flexibility some data has to be visible to a regulator, some has to stay confidential between the parties, and almost none of it should be visible to the entire internet by default.
$DUSK #dusk
Reading through @Dusk documentation on Phoenix and Moonlight, what stood out wasn't the existence of two transaction models plenty of chains claim optional privacy it was the framing. Phoenix handles shielded, confidential transfers. Moonlight handles transparent ones, closer to a standard account-based model. The choice of which to use sits with the participant, not the protocol. That's a small design decision with a large implication: privacy becomes a setting, not a default posture the whole network has to defend or apologize for.
Another point I hadn't considered until I sat with it: a regulated entity doesn't actually want blanket anonymity. It wants to prove compliance without exposing counterparties or balances to the public ledger. If a transaction needs to demonstrate that funds are clean or that a threshold wasn't breached, without revealing the underlying amounts, the system leans on selective disclosure through zero-knowledge proofs rather than on hiding everything or showing everything. That's a narrower claim than "private," and a more useful one for the audience DUSK is actually building for.
The caveat worth stating plainly: this is a transaction-layer design, not a regulatory approval. Having the technical capacity for auditable confidentiality doesn't mean every jurisdiction recognizes it, and it doesn't substitute for the compliance layer being built on top. It's infrastructure for that conversation, not the conclusion of it.
Zoomed out, this is where I think DUSK's actual bet is: that regulated DeFi doesn't get built by choosing between permissioned and permissionless, or between private and transparent, but by making both selectable at the transaction level. Tokenized securities and RWAs need exactly this kind of flexibility some data has to be visible to a regulator, some has to stay confidential between the parties, and almost none of it should be visible to the entire internet by default.
$DUSK #dusk
jjklllll
NAJAF_加密 143
·
--
Why Solana (SOL) Is Important in Cryptocurrency
Solana (SOL) is an important cryptocurrency because it powers the Solana blockchain, a high-performance network designed to process transactions quickly and at relatively low cost. Its speed and scalability make it suitable for decentralized applications (dApps), decentralized finance (DeFi), NFTs, gaming, and digital payments. SOL is used to pay transaction fees and can also be staked to help secure the network. A strong developer ecosystem and growing use of on-chain applications have helped Solana become one of the major blockchain platforms in the crypto market. Its importance comes from its focus on combining speed, scalability, and affordability while supporting a wide range of real-world blockchain applications. However, SOL remains a volatile crypto asset, so investors should consider risks and conduct their own research.
#ClaimNow #SolanaUSTD #BinanceSquareFamily $USDT
Solana (SOL) is an important cryptocurrency because it powers the Solana blockchain, a high-performance network designed to process transactions quickly and at relatively low cost. Its speed and scalability make it suitable for decentralized applications (dApps), decentralized finance (DeFi), NFTs, gaming, and digital payments. SOL is used to pay transaction fees and can also be staked to help secure the network. A strong developer ecosystem and growing use of on-chain applications have helped Solana become one of the major blockchain platforms in the crypto market. Its importance comes from its focus on combining speed, scalability, and affordability while supporting a wide range of real-world blockchain applications. However, SOL remains a volatile crypto asset, so investors should consider risks and conduct their own research.
#ClaimNow #SolanaUSTD #BinanceSquareFamily $USDT
done ✅✅✅
凯哥的进击
·
--
Падение🔥帮忙转发分享，谢谢🔥
🎁🎁回复领红包🎁🎁$SOL
✅祝持仓市值步步高升✅
✅开仓爆赚且日进斗金✅
🎁🎁回复领红包🎁🎁$SOL
✅祝持仓市值步步高升✅
✅开仓爆赚且日进斗金✅
hhjkbkm
Leo - F0
·
--
Рост🔥🧧🔥🧧RED PACKAGE SEASON🧧🔥🧧🔥
"Fade your shadows out in the storm,
Chasing the fire that keeps you warm."🔥💨
$BNB 🔥🔥🧧🧧
#金价升破4400美元创两月高位
$BTC $ETH
#1688家族family 💚
@周周1688
#TRUMP
"Fade your shadows out in the storm,
Chasing the fire that keeps you warm."🔥💨
$BNB 🔥🔥🧧🧧
#金价升破4400美元创两月高位
$BTC $ETH
#1688家族family 💚
@周周1688
#TRUMP
jjjjjklkk
Dr Nohawn
·
--
Spent time this week going through the Hedger docs on Dusk Network, and honestly, what caught me most was not the cryptography. It was the regulatory positioning.
Most privacy tools in crypto share the same assumption: privacy means hiding things. Regulators hate this. Hedger takes a different position. I checked the @Dusk docs and the framing is precise: regulators do not need full data access, they need verifiable correctness. Those are not the same requirement.
Hmm. That distinction is what makes Hedger worth examining. It combines homomorphic encryption based on ElGamal over elliptic curves with zero-knowledge proofs, keeping amounts and holdings encrypted while anyone can verify the computation was correct. In-browser proving runs under two seconds per official specs. A hybrid UTXO and account model handles cross-layer composability.
Encrypted Inputs → Homomorphic Computation → ZK Proof of Correctness → Verified Without Revealing Inputs → Regulator Checks Proof Not Data → Compliant Privacy
And look, Hedger is not an isolated module. It is built into DuskEVM, which inherits settlement guarantees from Dusk Layer 1 secured by validators staking $DUSK through Succinct Attestation, a Proof-of-Stake consensus with settlement finality for financial use. The privacy guarantee is not purely cryptographic, it is also economically enforced through staking.
I kept coming back to the NPEX partnership. NPEX holds MTF, Broker, ECSP, and DLT-TSS licenses, integrated into the protocol layer. Most blockchain privacy projects treat compliance as a later addition. I checked whether this shows up at the architecture level or just in the marketing, and across Hedger, DuskEVM, and the NPEX integration it does.
DuskEVM Execution → Hedger Confidential Flows → DUSK Stakers Consensus → Settlement Finality → NPEX Licensed Infrastructure → Compliant Privacy by Design
Can compliant privacy at the protocol level move institutional capital onchain, or does the compliance framing make the privacy too narrow to attract users who actually need it?
#dusk $DUSK
Most privacy tools in crypto share the same assumption: privacy means hiding things. Regulators hate this. Hedger takes a different position. I checked the @Dusk docs and the framing is precise: regulators do not need full data access, they need verifiable correctness. Those are not the same requirement.
Hmm. That distinction is what makes Hedger worth examining. It combines homomorphic encryption based on ElGamal over elliptic curves with zero-knowledge proofs, keeping amounts and holdings encrypted while anyone can verify the computation was correct. In-browser proving runs under two seconds per official specs. A hybrid UTXO and account model handles cross-layer composability.
Encrypted Inputs → Homomorphic Computation → ZK Proof of Correctness → Verified Without Revealing Inputs → Regulator Checks Proof Not Data → Compliant Privacy
And look, Hedger is not an isolated module. It is built into DuskEVM, which inherits settlement guarantees from Dusk Layer 1 secured by validators staking $DUSK through Succinct Attestation, a Proof-of-Stake consensus with settlement finality for financial use. The privacy guarantee is not purely cryptographic, it is also economically enforced through staking.
I kept coming back to the NPEX partnership. NPEX holds MTF, Broker, ECSP, and DLT-TSS licenses, integrated into the protocol layer. Most blockchain privacy projects treat compliance as a later addition. I checked whether this shows up at the architecture level or just in the marketing, and across Hedger, DuskEVM, and the NPEX integration it does.
DuskEVM Execution → Hedger Confidential Flows → DUSK Stakers Consensus → Settlement Finality → NPEX Licensed Infrastructure → Compliant Privacy by Design
Can compliant privacy at the protocol level move institutional capital onchain, or does the compliance framing make the privacy too narrow to attract users who actually need it?
#dusk $DUSK
hiiiiii
自由1688
·
--
马斯克狂砸600亿美元收购Cursor，SpaceX正式引爆“Vibe Coding”狂潮
各位币圈和AI赛道的老铁们，科技圈又丢下一枚震撼弹！
就在刚刚，SpaceX 正式完成了对明星 AI 编程初创公司 Cursor 的收购，这笔交易的估值高达 600亿美元，不仅刷新了科技行业的并购规模纪录，更标志着马斯克携 SpaceX 强势杀入“Vibe Coding（氛围编程）”的全新战场！
这场世纪大并购背后的深层逻辑是什么？对我们炒币、做 Web3 项目投资有什么启示？为你硬核拆解：
🔥 1. 估值600亿的“Vibe Coding”到底是个啥？
AI 编程的巅峰之作： Cursor 于 2023 年推出，是一款旨在帮助程序员极速编写和调试代码的顶级 AI 助手。颠覆传统的“氛围编程”： 伴随全球开发者需求的激增，Cursor 以历史级的速度崛起，不仅精准切入了当前 AI 应用中最赚钱的细分市场，更成为了引领“Vibe Coding”时代的核心参与者。未来，写代码的模式将向高阶的人机协同演进。
🤖 2. 算力与算法的终极合体：Grok 迎来史诗级进化
接入全球最大 GPU 集群： 交易完成后，Cursor 的联合创始人们不仅跻身亿万富翁，其团队也将直接获得 SpaceX 储备的海量先进 AI 芯片资源。这将大幅提升算力上限，构建更强模型并有效降低运行成本。Grok 矩阵全线爆发： 在交易正式落锤前的 7 月份，双方就联合推出了专注编程、金融和法律等任务的 Grok 4.5 模型，且使用成本低于竞品。紧接着，能够像 AI 智能体团队一样持续执行任务的 Grok Bot 和升级版 Grok 4.6 也火速上线。
🚀 3. 马斯克的野心：AI 才是 SpaceX 的“终极印钞机”
经历了一系列裁员和重组后，马斯克旗下的 AI 业务（现整合为 SpaceXAI）开始全面发力。他在近期的内部会议上霸气宣告，公司“必须在软件领域取得成功”。更恐怖的是他的变现预测：到今年 9 月份，AI 业务的收入将彻底超越 SpaceX 的其他所有业务收入总和！ 这次收购正是他缩小与 OpenAI、Anthropic 差距的关键绝杀。
💡 给 Web3/Crypto 交易者的终极启示：
算力就是新石油，DePIN 赛道迎暴击利好： 除了自我进化，SpaceX 还达成了一系列数十亿美元的协议，向 Anthropic、Google 等巨头开放其计算资源。巨头对算力的极度渴望，再次印证了算力资产的核心价值。致力于打破集中化垄断的 DePIN（去中心化物理基础设施）和分布式算力项目，势必迎来新一轮的叙事重估。Web3 开发门槛被彻底踏平： 随着 Cursor 这种神级工具与顶级大模型的融合，智能合约的编写、DApp 的开发效率将呈指数级跃升。那些能率先将“Vibe Coding”引入开发流程的 Crypto 团队，必将在激烈的项目竞争中实现降维打击。
当大佬们都在疯狂豪赌“算力+AI 编程”时，作为投资者的我们必须保持极度的警醒。顺应周期脉搏，死死盯住 Crypto+AI 赛道，这才是通往下一个风口的财富密码！
就在刚刚，SpaceX 正式完成了对明星 AI 编程初创公司 Cursor 的收购，这笔交易的估值高达 600亿美元，不仅刷新了科技行业的并购规模纪录，更标志着马斯克携 SpaceX 强势杀入“Vibe Coding（氛围编程）”的全新战场！
这场世纪大并购背后的深层逻辑是什么？对我们炒币、做 Web3 项目投资有什么启示？为你硬核拆解：
🔥 1. 估值600亿的“Vibe Coding”到底是个啥？
AI 编程的巅峰之作： Cursor 于 2023 年推出，是一款旨在帮助程序员极速编写和调试代码的顶级 AI 助手。颠覆传统的“氛围编程”： 伴随全球开发者需求的激增，Cursor 以历史级的速度崛起，不仅精准切入了当前 AI 应用中最赚钱的细分市场，更成为了引领“Vibe Coding”时代的核心参与者。未来，写代码的模式将向高阶的人机协同演进。
🤖 2. 算力与算法的终极合体：Grok 迎来史诗级进化
接入全球最大 GPU 集群： 交易完成后，Cursor 的联合创始人们不仅跻身亿万富翁，其团队也将直接获得 SpaceX 储备的海量先进 AI 芯片资源。这将大幅提升算力上限，构建更强模型并有效降低运行成本。Grok 矩阵全线爆发： 在交易正式落锤前的 7 月份，双方就联合推出了专注编程、金融和法律等任务的 Grok 4.5 模型，且使用成本低于竞品。紧接着，能够像 AI 智能体团队一样持续执行任务的 Grok Bot 和升级版 Grok 4.6 也火速上线。
🚀 3. 马斯克的野心：AI 才是 SpaceX 的“终极印钞机”
经历了一系列裁员和重组后，马斯克旗下的 AI 业务（现整合为 SpaceXAI）开始全面发力。他在近期的内部会议上霸气宣告，公司“必须在软件领域取得成功”。更恐怖的是他的变现预测：到今年 9 月份，AI 业务的收入将彻底超越 SpaceX 的其他所有业务收入总和！ 这次收购正是他缩小与 OpenAI、Anthropic 差距的关键绝杀。
💡 给 Web3/Crypto 交易者的终极启示：
算力就是新石油，DePIN 赛道迎暴击利好： 除了自我进化，SpaceX 还达成了一系列数十亿美元的协议，向 Anthropic、Google 等巨头开放其计算资源。巨头对算力的极度渴望，再次印证了算力资产的核心价值。致力于打破集中化垄断的 DePIN（去中心化物理基础设施）和分布式算力项目，势必迎来新一轮的叙事重估。Web3 开发门槛被彻底踏平： 随着 Cursor 这种神级工具与顶级大模型的融合，智能合约的编写、DApp 的开发效率将呈指数级跃升。那些能率先将“Vibe Coding”引入开发流程的 Crypto 团队，必将在激烈的项目竞争中实现降维打击。
当大佬们都在疯狂豪赌“算力+AI 编程”时，作为投资者的我们必须保持极度的警醒。顺应周期脉搏，死死盯住 Crypto+AI 赛道，这才是通往下一个风口的财富密码！
jjjj
圣克斯Lucky1688
·
--
粉丝满5k了，第二次发红包帖，Thanks everyone！Thanks 1688！Thanks lucky！谢谢币安广场的每一位！祝大家天天赚钱，天天Lucky！买啥涨啥！牛牛包围！
hello 👋
AYESHA ABID 阿伊莎 阿比德
·
--
🎁 SOL Red Packet Quiz
Answer correctly & claim your reward!
Answer correctly & claim your reward!
hhhhhh
AbdullRauf
·
--
GIVEAWAY ALERT 🧧
We're giving away 2000 gifts to our Square Family as a huge thank you for your support!
To Enter:
✅ Follow
✅ Share this post
✅ Comment "Good luck!"
Random winners will be selected. Good luck, everyone! 🚀
We're giving away 2000 gifts to our Square Family as a huge thank you for your support!
To Enter:
✅ Follow
✅ Share this post
✅ Comment "Good luck!"
Random winners will be selected. Good luck, everyone! 🚀
ffffg
DIYA_加密
·
--
🧧 Red Packet Distribution Announcement
I have released Red Packets for my Binance followers.
If you are seeing this post?please claim your reward as soon as possible.
Rewards are available on a first-come, first-served basis and will be distributed until fully claimed.
Participate promptly to maximize your opportunity.
Thank you, and best of luck to all participants.
#Binance #RedPacket #Crypto #Rewards #USDT🔥🔥🔥
I have released Red Packets for my Binance followers.
If you are seeing this post?please claim your reward as soon as possible.
Rewards are available on a first-come, first-served basis and will be distributed until fully claimed.
Participate promptly to maximize your opportunity.
Thank you, and best of luck to all participants.
#Binance #RedPacket #Crypto #Rewards #USDT🔥🔥🔥
ooooo
Цитируемый контент удален
hhhhh
Crypto Wolf Official
·
--
5 years ago, I opened my Binance account.
I made profits, but lost almost 2x more. 😅
Still, I learned, stayed strong, and kept holding $BTC, $BNB, $XRP & $DOGE. 💎
I believe one day this journey will pay off. 🚀
Still here. Still believing. 🫡
#Binance #CryptoWolfOfficial
I made profits, but lost almost 2x more. 😅
Still, I learned, stayed strong, and kept holding $BTC, $BNB, $XRP & $DOGE. 💎
I believe one day this journey will pay off. 🚀
Still here. Still believing. 🫡
#Binance #CryptoWolfOfficial
ioooooo
橙子Joyce
·
--
13F大揭秘 | 英偉達Q2持倉大公開：SpaceX躍居第二大重倉，黃仁勳又在下一盤什麼棋？
英偉達與馬斯克的關系，已經不只是「賣芯片」和「買芯片」。
今日， $英偉達 (NVDA.US)$ 披露第二季度持倉報告，首次公開其SpaceX頭寸：截至6月30日，公司持有約1.23億股SpaceX A類股，季末市值約210億美元，占其披露股票組合的33.06%，僅次于英特爾，成為英偉達第二大股權持倉。
按FactSet統計口徑，英偉達也由此進入SpaceX前六大股東之列。更值得關注的是，這并不是一筆普通的二級市場買入，而是一場由xAI投資、SpaceX收購和芯片采購共同串聯起來的戰略布局。
SpaceX一舉成為英偉達第二大持倉
從第二季度持倉結構來看，英偉達披露的股票組合總市值約634億美元，集中度非常高。
其中， $英特爾 (INTC.US)$ 仍是第一大持倉，市值約300億美元，占比47.27%； $SpaceX (SPCX.US)$ 則以約210億美元的市值直接躍居第二，占比33.06%。兩家公司合計占到整個組合的80%以上。
其余持倉則明顯較小： $CoreWeave (CRWV.US)$ 約47億美元，占比7.41%； $Coherent (COHR.US)$ 約30.7億美元，占比4.84%； $諾基亞 (NOK.US)$ 約22.1億美元，占比3.48%； $新思科技 (SNPS.US)$ 約21.5億美元，占比3.39%； $NEBIUS (NBIS.US)$ 約3.29億美元，占比0.52%； $Generate Biomedicines (GENB.US)$ 0.14億美元，占比0.02%。
這意味著，SpaceX并不是英偉達投資組合中的試探性配置，而是一筆足以顯著影響組合表現的核心持倉。
股權怎么來的？源于對xAI的100億美元投資
英偉達持有SpaceX，并非因為其在IPO后突然大舉買入。
今年1月，英偉達曾向馬斯克旗下人工智能公司xAI投資100億美元。隨后在2月，SpaceX以全股票交易方式收購xAI，合并估值達到1.25萬億美元，英偉達持有的xAI股權也由此轉換為SpaceX股份。
隨著SpaceX在6月完成上市，這筆原本隱藏在非上市公司中的投資，才首次以公開股票持倉的形式出現在英偉達的13F報告中。
按照6月30日170.86美元的收盤價計算，這批股份價值約209.8億美元。但截至本周五，SpaceX股價回落至約140美元，英偉達持倉市值已降至約172億美元。
換句話說，SpaceX股價較季末回落約18%，令英偉達這筆持倉賬面縮水近38億美元。需要注意的是，13F只能反映6月30日的持倉，無法顯示英偉達此后是否增減持。
真正的重點，不是賬面賺了多少錢
如果只把這筆投資理解為英偉達押中了SpaceX，反而低估了它的戰略意義。
在SpaceX本季度業績電話會上，馬斯克明確表示，公司未來的AI基礎設施將全面建立在英偉達平台之上，并將Vera Rubin稱為目前最優的AI計算架構。
SpaceX計劃從明年開始部署Vera Rubin NVL72系統，應用范圍不僅包括地面數據中心，也可能延伸至軌道計算。馬斯克還表示，公司預計2026年底擁有超過2GW的在線算力，到2027年底可能接近10GW。
由此，一個完整的資本與商業閉環開始浮現：英偉達先向xAI提供資本，幫助其擴張模型和算力；xAI并入SpaceX后，英偉達成為SpaceX重要股東；與此同時，SpaceX又將英偉達確定為AI基礎設施的獨家芯片平台。
如果SpaceX的AI和軌道計算計劃順利推進，英偉達不僅可以獲得GPU、網絡和整套計算平臺的訂單，還可以分享SpaceX估值增長帶來的股權收益。
這已經不只是「投資客戶」，而是通過資本提前鎖定下一代超級算力買家。
一張持倉圖，暴露英偉達的AI生態野心
從整個持倉組合來看，英偉達的投資邏輯并不追求傳統意義上的行業分散，而是在沿著AI產業鏈主動布局。
$英特爾 (INTC.US)$ 對應芯片制造和計算平台， $新思科技 (SNPS.US)$ 覆蓋芯片設計工具， $Coherent (COHR.US)$ 和 $諾基亞 (NOK.US)$ 對應光通信及網絡基礎設施， $CoreWeave (CRWV.US)$ 和 $NEBIUS (NBIS.US)$ 屬于AI雲與算力運營商， $SpaceX (SPCX.US)$ 則同時覆蓋大模型、數據中心和潛在的軌道計算場景。
這些公司共同指向一條主線：從芯片設計、制造、互連和網絡，到云端算力，再到最終的AI應用，英偉達正嘗試把自己嵌入整個AI基礎設施生態。
閉環還是「循環融資」，仍需市場驗證
當然，這種模式也會帶來新的爭議。
當英偉達一邊向AI公司投資，一邊向這些公司出售芯片，市場難免會擔心：部分GPU需求是否依賴資本輸血，進而形成「英偉達出錢、客戶買卡、訂單反過來支撐英偉達估值」的循環。
SpaceX的加入并不能直接證明這種擔憂成立，但會讓市場更加關注幾個指標：SpaceX的算力建設能否按計劃落地、AI業務能否產生足夠現金流、GPU利用率是否匹配資本開支，以及大規模采購是否來自獨立、可持續的真實需求。
此外，英偉達前兩大持倉占比超過80%，SpaceX股價的劇烈波動也意味著，其股權投資組合的賬面價值將變得更加敏感。
英偉達正在從芯片公司變成「AI資本中樞」
英偉達持有SpaceX約210億美元股份，表面上是一筆成功的股權轉換；更深層的意義則是，英偉達正在改變自己在AI產業中的角色。
它不再滿足于做一家收取GPU收入的「賣鏟人」，而是開始通過股權、融資和技術合作，主動參與客戶的成長，并嘗試把芯片訂單、產業擴張與股權回報連接起來。
SpaceX正是這套模式目前最具代表性的案例：英偉達既是股東，也是核心供應商；SpaceX既是被投企業，也可能成為未來全球最大的AI算力買家之一。
如果SpaceX的地面及軌道AI基礎設施兌現，英偉達獲得的將是「芯片收入＋股權升值」的雙重回報；但如果AI資本開支降溫，兩者之間日益加深的資本與業務聯系，也可能放大訂單和估值的共振風險。
這筆210億美元的持倉，真正揭示的不是英偉達買了什么，而是黃仁勛正在把英偉達變成什么。
今日， $英偉達 (NVDA.US)$ 披露第二季度持倉報告，首次公開其SpaceX頭寸：截至6月30日，公司持有約1.23億股SpaceX A類股，季末市值約210億美元，占其披露股票組合的33.06%，僅次于英特爾，成為英偉達第二大股權持倉。
按FactSet統計口徑，英偉達也由此進入SpaceX前六大股東之列。更值得關注的是，這并不是一筆普通的二級市場買入，而是一場由xAI投資、SpaceX收購和芯片采購共同串聯起來的戰略布局。
SpaceX一舉成為英偉達第二大持倉
從第二季度持倉結構來看，英偉達披露的股票組合總市值約634億美元，集中度非常高。
其中， $英特爾 (INTC.US)$ 仍是第一大持倉，市值約300億美元，占比47.27%； $SpaceX (SPCX.US)$ 則以約210億美元的市值直接躍居第二，占比33.06%。兩家公司合計占到整個組合的80%以上。
其余持倉則明顯較小： $CoreWeave (CRWV.US)$ 約47億美元，占比7.41%； $Coherent (COHR.US)$ 約30.7億美元，占比4.84%； $諾基亞 (NOK.US)$ 約22.1億美元，占比3.48%； $新思科技 (SNPS.US)$ 約21.5億美元，占比3.39%； $NEBIUS (NBIS.US)$ 約3.29億美元，占比0.52%； $Generate Biomedicines (GENB.US)$ 0.14億美元，占比0.02%。
這意味著，SpaceX并不是英偉達投資組合中的試探性配置，而是一筆足以顯著影響組合表現的核心持倉。
股權怎么來的？源于對xAI的100億美元投資
英偉達持有SpaceX，并非因為其在IPO后突然大舉買入。
今年1月，英偉達曾向馬斯克旗下人工智能公司xAI投資100億美元。隨后在2月，SpaceX以全股票交易方式收購xAI，合并估值達到1.25萬億美元，英偉達持有的xAI股權也由此轉換為SpaceX股份。
隨著SpaceX在6月完成上市，這筆原本隱藏在非上市公司中的投資，才首次以公開股票持倉的形式出現在英偉達的13F報告中。
按照6月30日170.86美元的收盤價計算，這批股份價值約209.8億美元。但截至本周五，SpaceX股價回落至約140美元，英偉達持倉市值已降至約172億美元。
換句話說，SpaceX股價較季末回落約18%，令英偉達這筆持倉賬面縮水近38億美元。需要注意的是，13F只能反映6月30日的持倉，無法顯示英偉達此后是否增減持。
真正的重點，不是賬面賺了多少錢
如果只把這筆投資理解為英偉達押中了SpaceX，反而低估了它的戰略意義。
在SpaceX本季度業績電話會上，馬斯克明確表示，公司未來的AI基礎設施將全面建立在英偉達平台之上，并將Vera Rubin稱為目前最優的AI計算架構。
SpaceX計劃從明年開始部署Vera Rubin NVL72系統，應用范圍不僅包括地面數據中心，也可能延伸至軌道計算。馬斯克還表示，公司預計2026年底擁有超過2GW的在線算力，到2027年底可能接近10GW。
由此，一個完整的資本與商業閉環開始浮現：英偉達先向xAI提供資本，幫助其擴張模型和算力；xAI并入SpaceX后，英偉達成為SpaceX重要股東；與此同時，SpaceX又將英偉達確定為AI基礎設施的獨家芯片平台。
如果SpaceX的AI和軌道計算計劃順利推進，英偉達不僅可以獲得GPU、網絡和整套計算平臺的訂單，還可以分享SpaceX估值增長帶來的股權收益。
這已經不只是「投資客戶」，而是通過資本提前鎖定下一代超級算力買家。
一張持倉圖，暴露英偉達的AI生態野心
從整個持倉組合來看，英偉達的投資邏輯并不追求傳統意義上的行業分散，而是在沿著AI產業鏈主動布局。
$英特爾 (INTC.US)$ 對應芯片制造和計算平台， $新思科技 (SNPS.US)$ 覆蓋芯片設計工具， $Coherent (COHR.US)$ 和 $諾基亞 (NOK.US)$ 對應光通信及網絡基礎設施， $CoreWeave (CRWV.US)$ 和 $NEBIUS (NBIS.US)$ 屬于AI雲與算力運營商， $SpaceX (SPCX.US)$ 則同時覆蓋大模型、數據中心和潛在的軌道計算場景。
這些公司共同指向一條主線：從芯片設計、制造、互連和網絡，到云端算力，再到最終的AI應用，英偉達正嘗試把自己嵌入整個AI基礎設施生態。
閉環還是「循環融資」，仍需市場驗證
當然，這種模式也會帶來新的爭議。
當英偉達一邊向AI公司投資，一邊向這些公司出售芯片，市場難免會擔心：部分GPU需求是否依賴資本輸血，進而形成「英偉達出錢、客戶買卡、訂單反過來支撐英偉達估值」的循環。
SpaceX的加入并不能直接證明這種擔憂成立，但會讓市場更加關注幾個指標：SpaceX的算力建設能否按計劃落地、AI業務能否產生足夠現金流、GPU利用率是否匹配資本開支，以及大規模采購是否來自獨立、可持續的真實需求。
此外，英偉達前兩大持倉占比超過80%，SpaceX股價的劇烈波動也意味著，其股權投資組合的賬面價值將變得更加敏感。
英偉達正在從芯片公司變成「AI資本中樞」
英偉達持有SpaceX約210億美元股份，表面上是一筆成功的股權轉換；更深層的意義則是，英偉達正在改變自己在AI產業中的角色。
它不再滿足于做一家收取GPU收入的「賣鏟人」，而是開始通過股權、融資和技術合作，主動參與客戶的成長，并嘗試把芯片訂單、產業擴張與股權回報連接起來。
SpaceX正是這套模式目前最具代表性的案例：英偉達既是股東，也是核心供應商；SpaceX既是被投企業，也可能成為未來全球最大的AI算力買家之一。
如果SpaceX的地面及軌道AI基礎設施兌現，英偉達獲得的將是「芯片收入＋股權升值」的雙重回報；但如果AI資本開支降溫，兩者之間日益加深的資本與業務聯系，也可能放大訂單和估值的共振風險。
這筆210億美元的持倉，真正揭示的不是英偉達買了什么，而是黃仁勛正在把英偉達變成什么。
$DUSK I’ve been looking at the DuskEVM withdrawal flow, and honestly, this is one of those small details that made me understand the architecture better.
At first, I assumed moving $DUSK between Dusk L1 and DuskEVM would feel the same in both directions. It doesn’t. A deposit can move from Dusk L1 into the connected DuskEVM account, but withdrawing back requires more: first proving the withdrawal on Dusk L1, then finalizing it.
The extra steps are not what caught my attention most. It’s the reasoning behind them. Withdrawal readiness depends on network state, proof maturity, and dispute-game checks, so simply waiting for a certain amount of time isn’t enough. The Web Wallet status becomes important.
I can see the logic. If funds are moving back toward the settlement layer, the system needs evidence before treating that withdrawal as final. But there’s a trade-off: stronger settlement assurance can also mean more fees, more actions, and more dependence on status tracking.
My take is that this is a good example of Dusk balancing security with usability rather than pretending there is no trade off.
@Dusk #dusk
At first, I assumed moving $DUSK between Dusk L1 and DuskEVM would feel the same in both directions. It doesn’t. A deposit can move from Dusk L1 into the connected DuskEVM account, but withdrawing back requires more: first proving the withdrawal on Dusk L1, then finalizing it.
The extra steps are not what caught my attention most. It’s the reasoning behind them. Withdrawal readiness depends on network state, proof maturity, and dispute-game checks, so simply waiting for a certain amount of time isn’t enough. The Web Wallet status becomes important.
I can see the logic. If funds are moving back toward the settlement layer, the system needs evidence before treating that withdrawal as final. But there’s a trade-off: stronger settlement assurance can also mean more fees, more actions, and more dependence on status tracking.
My take is that this is a good example of Dusk balancing security with usability rather than pretending there is no trade off.
@Dusk #dusk
$DUSK I’ve been looking at Citadel 2 on @DuskFoundation, and one thing genuinely changed how I think about investor eligibility.
I used to assume that proving someone is eligible would eventually mean putting more of their identity onchain. Citadel takes a different approach. A trusted License Provider checks the user offchain, signs the relevant attributes, and registers an encrypted license. Later, the user can prove they hold that license without exposing their identity, personal details, wallet key, or even which specific license was used.
What I like here is the separation of responsibilities. Citadel can verify the proof, but it doesn’t decide who gets access. The Service Provider still decides which providers it trusts and what its own rules require.
That feels much more practical to me. Privacy doesn’t mean removing accountability; it means exposing only what actually needs to be verified.
My take: this is the kind of infrastructure that could make blockchain-based financial systems more usable where privacy, compliance, and trust all matter.
Does Citadel 2 change how you think about onchain identity?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
I used to assume that proving someone is eligible would eventually mean putting more of their identity onchain. Citadel takes a different approach. A trusted License Provider checks the user offchain, signs the relevant attributes, and registers an encrypted license. Later, the user can prove they hold that license without exposing their identity, personal details, wallet key, or even which specific license was used.
What I like here is the separation of responsibilities. Citadel can verify the proof, but it doesn’t decide who gets access. The Service Provider still decides which providers it trusts and what its own rules require.
That feels much more practical to me. Privacy doesn’t mean removing accountability; it means exposing only what actually needs to be verified.
My take: this is the kind of infrastructure that could make blockchain-based financial systems more usable where privacy, compliance, and trust all matter.
Does Citadel 2 change how you think about onchain identity?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Hello friends, I hope you are all doing well.
Friends, today we attended the Binance Meetup program at Serena Hotel, Peshawar, and we had a wonderful time. We received different gifts and also had the opportunity to meet many fellow traders and friends.
The meetup was really great, and we enjoyed it a lot. InshaAllah, we will also join the next meetup.
#Binancemeetuppeshawar #Binancecommunity #peshawar
Friends, today we attended the Binance Meetup program at Serena Hotel, Peshawar, and we had a wonderful time. We received different gifts and also had the opportunity to meet many fellow traders and friends.
The meetup was really great, and we enjoyed it a lot. InshaAllah, we will also join the next meetup.
#Binancemeetuppeshawar #Binancecommunity #peshawar
kkkkkk
Crypto Wolf Official
·
--
Currently in a big loss, but still holding BNB.😅
I still believe BNB has a strong future. The real story is what gets built on it. 🚀
#BNB #BNBChain #HODL
I still believe BNB has a strong future. The real story is what gets built on it. 🚀
#BNB #BNBChain #HODL
hhhhh
Цитируемый контент удален
ooooooo
⁰MR RAJ⁰
·
--
Рост🌕🌱 $NASA.ETF may soon grow the first plants on the Moon, taking a major step toward sustainable human life beyond Earth! 🚀✨
$NVDA.US $TRUMP
#redpacket #MoneyGramExpandsCashCryptoServiceToSolana #TrumpDemandsCompensationFromIran #SheinToStartHKIPOBookbuildingAsSoonAsNextWeek #BlackRockCanadaLaunchesBitcoinLinkedETF
$NVDA.US $TRUMP
#redpacket #MoneyGramExpandsCashCryptoServiceToSolana #TrumpDemandsCompensationFromIran #SheinToStartHKIPOBookbuildingAsSoonAsNextWeek #BlackRockCanadaLaunchesBitcoinLinkedETF
Войдите, чтобы посмотреть больше материала