Mavis Evan

Add more $ZEC

$TRB BULLISH 🚀

$TRB has broken out of the falling wedge on the 4H chart, and the structure is starting to look interesting.

The breakout is now the key. If TRB holds above the wedge and builds momentum, the next levels to watch are:

🎯 TP1: $17.80
🎯 TP2: $18.80

A clean move above $17.80 could open the door toward the higher target.

For now, keep an eye on the retest. A failed breakout could turn this into a fakeout, so don’t chase blindly.

$TRB is one to watch.

LONG $ZKC | HIGH RISK

$ZKC is showing a strong breakout attempt after months of downtrend.

Long Bias: Bullish
💰 Entry: Around $0.066–$0.067
🎯 TP1: $0.078
🎯 TP2: $0.125
🎯 TP3: $0.293
🚀 Major Target: $1.40+

Funding interval has shifted from 4H → 1H, so I’m adding more $ZKC perpetual exposure to collect funding every 1 hour.

The chart is finally showing a strong move away from the long-term accumulation zone. If momentum continues and key levels hold, ZKC could have a much bigger leg ahead.

Manage risk. Don’t overleverage.

$ZKC BULLISH

$ZKC is showing a major breakout structure on the daily chart.

After a long downtrend, price has finally broken above the moving average with a strong impulse candle. Now the chart is setting up for a potential new bullish cycle.

Key levels I’m watching:

Entry zone: $0.065 – $0.070

First target: $0.10

Next: $0.145

Major target: $0.293

Bullish extension: $0.50+

The biggest level on the chart is around $0.293. If bulls reclaim and hold it, the entire structure can change dramatically.

This is a high-volatility setup, so risk management matters. The chart is bullish, but confirmation is everything.

$ZKC could be just getting started.

$ZEC new leg is coming 👀

$ZEC is holding strong after that massive breakout and now consolidating around $840.

The structure still looks bullish. If buyers push through the $880 area, the next leg could get aggressive. 🚀

I’m watching $880 closely. A clean breakout could open the door toward $950–$1,000.

$ZEC is not done yet. 🔥

The best part of the cycle is when price goes parabolic. 🚀

And honestly… we’re not there yet.

The charts are showing strength, but the real vertical phase still looks ahead. Once momentum starts accelerating and price leaves the long consolidation behind, that’s when the market can move very differently.

The boring part comes first.
The parabolic part comes later. 👀📈

Stay patient. The cycle isn’t finished.

$HYPE
$BNB

🥦 $BROCCOLI714 BULLISH

🟢 Entry: $0.0190 – $0.0200
🎯 TP: $0.030 → $0.045 → $0.075 → $0.120 → $0.180 → $0.301
🛑 SL: $0.0121

Daily chart is showing a strong base with a possible breakout above $0.020.

Manage risk. Don’t chase the pump.

$BROCCOLI714

$GIGGLE BULLISH 👀🔥

$GIGGLE is sitting in an interesting zone after a long downtrend. The 1D chart shows price building a base while the descending trendline is getting tested again.

📍 Entry: $38.00 – $40.00

🎯 Targets:
$45.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00+

🛑 SL: $30.00

The key level is around $41–42. A clean daily breakout above that resistance could open the door toward the higher targets.

I’d rather see confirmation than chase a sudden candle. If $GIGGLE holds the current structure and breaks the trendline with strength, this setup could get very interesting. 🚀

Stay patient, manage risk, and let the chart confirm the move.
#NYSilverFuturesDrop3%

$ZKP BULLISH 🚀

$ZKP is showing an interesting setup on the 1D chart. After a long downtrend, price has started building a base around the current zone instead of making aggressive new lows.

📍 Entry Zone: $0.0450 – $0.0485

🎯 Targets: $0.0600
$0.0800
$0.1100
$0.1500
$0.1800
$0.2200+

🛑 Invalidation: Below $0.0365

The chart structure gives this trade a strong asymmetric setup. If ZKP can hold the base and start breaking above the recent resistance areas, the upside could expand quickly.

The key is patience. We don't need to chase the first pump. Let the price confirm strength and manage risk around the invalidation level.

$ZKP could be one to watch closely from here.

$TRUMP BULLISH

$TRUMP is showing a major breakout setup on the 1D chart after spending a long time inside a clear descending trend.

Price is now around $2.83, pushing above the long-term resistance line. If this breakout holds and buyers continue stepping in, TRUMP could start a much bigger recovery.

Entry Zone: $2.70 – $2.95

Take Profit Targets:

TP1: $3.50 ,TP2: $4.20 ,TP3: $5.00 ,TP4: $6.00
TP5: $8.00

Stop Loss: $2.35

The key level to watch is $2.70–$2.80. Holding above this area would keep the breakout structure healthy. A strong daily close above the descending trendline could bring serious momentum and open the door toward the higher targets.

Don't chase a sudden candle. Entry around the zone or on a clean retest gives better risk control.

$TRUMP could finally be waking up after a long downtrend.

$SOL SHORT
$SOL is showing rejection from the $106–$108 zone, with downside momentum starting to build.

📍 Entry: $106.20

🎯 Take Profits: • TP1: $103.50
• TP2: $100.30
• TP3: $95.35

🛑 Stop Loss: $115.00

The main idea is simple: if $SOL fails to reclaim the upper zone and selling pressure continues, we could see a move toward $103.50 → $100.30 → $95.35.

Manage your position size carefully and don't overexpose.

$BTR Short

Exchange: Binance Futures
Leverage: 3-5x

Entry: 0.166 - 0176

Targets: 0.160 - 0.155 – 0.145 - 0.135 - 0.120 - 0.105 - 0.085 - 0.065 - 0.047 - 0.028

SL: Above 0.194

I’m watching $TAC closely because the chart is starting to show the kind of structure that can turn explosive when momentum returns.

Last time we had a couple of interesting movers with $BANK & $AKE . Now I’m watching $BTR & TAC for the next possible expansion. My analysis of this TAC chart shows a long consolidation after the major sell-off, followed by a strong reclaim from the lows.

The important part is the base. TAC has spent weeks moving sideways around the lower zone, and now price is pushing back above that area. If buyers keep defending the demand zone, this could become a much bigger move.

Current price: $0.005084

Entry Zone: $0.003480 – $0.005052

TP1: $0.035000

TP2: $0.068677

SL: $0.002000

Why I’m interested in $TAC :

• Long accumulation structure
• Strong move after a deep liquidity sweep
• Price is reclaiming the previous demand area
• Large upside gap remains on the chart
• A breakout above the recent range could bring aggressive momentum

I’m not saying price goes straight to the target. Crypto doesn’t move that cleanly. If you want to take this setup, the condition I’m watching is simple: TAC needs to hold the lower support and continue building higher.

If buyers actually step in with volume, the first major area I’m watching is $0.035000. Above that, the chart opens toward $0.068677.

This is why you need to watch the structure, not just the candle. The setup is interesting because the risk zone is clearly defined while the upside is much larger.

Last time it was BANK & $AKE .

Now I’m watching $BTR & $TAC .

Manage your risk. This is a high-volatility setup, not guaranteed profit.

$ARIA BULLISH

I'm watching $ARIA for a breakout after a strong base. Price is holding near $0.039, with momentum improving above the moving average.

EP: $0.037–$0.039
TP: $0.055 → $0.085 → $0.120
SL: $0.0245

If ARIA holds $0.037 and breaks resistance with volume, they are likely to push higher.

$ARIA LET'S GO

$ETH BULLISH 🚀

I'm watching $ETH closely here because the 2H chart is compressing inside a clear triangle after a strong impulse move. Price is holding around $2,473 and the structure still looks constructive.

if ETH breaks and holds above the $2,500 area, they are likely to target the upper resistance zone. I have the bigger technical target near $3,250, while the setup becomes invalid below $2,243.

EP: $2,460–$2,480
TP: $3,250
SL: $2,243

What's the condition? I want to see a clean breakout with volume, not just a quick wick. If you want to take this setup, manage risk because a triangle can break either way.

$ETH LET'S GO

$BNB BULLISH 📈

BNB has been building a long accumulation range around $540–$710.

Breakout from this zone could open the path much higher.

🎯 Target: $2,220+

Invalidation: below $594

Structure looks bullish. Patience.

LONG $ZEC

ZEC is sitting on a breakout setup after holding the rising trendline.

If momentum kicks in, the next move could get violent.

🎯 TP: $100B market cap

Risk managed. Let the chart do the talking.

#ZEC #Crypto

🚀 $BTC $ETH LONG
Both breaking out of descending trendline resistance on the 1H. Clean structure, target zone mapped out.
BTC: 78,810 → target 85,595
ETH: 2,496 → target 2,760
Trendline breakout + reclaim of range high. Watching for continuation. NFA, DYOR.

#BrentDrops1.87%

#termmax @TermMax
Okay ...yeah ,Fixed-rate borrowing in DeFi sounds boring.

Honestly, that’s exactly why it matters.

Most lending markets leave users exposed to rates that can move fast when liquidity gets tight. @TermMax takes a different route, combining fixed-rate lending and borrowing with options trading.

On paper, the idea makes sense. Predictable financing costs are useful for traders, borrowers and anyone managing capital over a defined period.

But the hard part isn’t building the mechanism.

It’s liquidity.

Fixed maturities can fragment markets, and options need real depth to be useful. Incentives can create activity, but they can’t guarantee lasting demand.

Interesting design. Now the market has to prove it actually needs it.

#TermMax

Most people are still measuring @TermMax by the wrong numbers.

1.5M registered wallets sounds impressive until you divide the reported $90M TVL by that base.

$90M ÷ 1.5M = about $60 per wallet.

That doesn't automatically mean weak growth. It raises a more useful question: how many wallets actually become active capital?

A funded position is one thing. Returning after maturity, opening another position, and committing more capital is a completely different signal.

The same applies to the multichain story. If $90M is spread across 10 EVM chains, the simple average is only $9M per chain. More distribution can improve access, but fixed-rate markets live or die on liquidity depth. Ten deployments don't create ten deep markets.

I'd also watch where vault capital is actually working. If 40% of assets are routed into Aave, Morpho, or Venus instead of TermMax's own fixed-term markets, that could be smart yield optimization. But it could also reveal something uncomfortable: native borrower demand isn't deep enough to absorb the capital.

And then there's TMX.

A fixed 1B supply makes scarcity easy to measure. Demand is much harder.

For me, #TermMax 's next phase isn't about collecting more wallets or launching on more chains.

It's about proving that users come back, capital stays productive, and fixed-rate demand is strong enough to support the economics.

That's where the real valuation story starts.
#termmax @TermMax