加密野狼
381 Жариялаулар
加密野狼
«Square расталған+» белгісіX:@cryptionwolf
Web3从业者|神龙社区发起人|金狗捕手|多个大社区主讲|专业承接宣发|开发|商学院，持续扎根加密圈全靠ip信誉生存,欢迎交流
Ашық сауда
BNB ұстаушы
Жиі сауда жасайтын трейдер
9.1 жыл
845 Жазылым
50.2K+ Жазылушылар
21.7K+ лайк басылған
Жазбалар
Портфолио
Барлығы
Баға ұсыныстары
Тікелей эфир
PINNED
财富密码在BNB
72%
财富密码在社区币
12%
财富密码在MEME币
14%
财富密码在合约
2%
64 дауыс • Дауыс беру жабық
快牛市开启
51%
慢牛市开启
31%
可能要大跌
18%
65 дауыс • Дауыс беру жабық
Yi He
·
--
I heard that Binance Square is getting popular, so I'm here to test the buzz.
CZ
·
--
Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto.
At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂
In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks.
And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway.
New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term.
People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets.
This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later.
Fundamentally:
It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt.
More computing power is always good.
Crypto will stay, post quantum.
At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂
In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks.
And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway.
New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term.
People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets.
This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later.
Fundamentally:
It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt.
More computing power is always good.
Crypto will stay, post quantum.
Көбірек контент көру үшін кіріңіз