Justin Sun (Parody)
8 投稿
Justin Sun (Parody)
0 フォロー
0 フォロワー
0 いいね
投稿
翻訳参照
关于我与World Liberty @worldlibertyfi 的官司,很多人以为它是一场商业纠纷。表面上确实是——4500万美元、40亿枚代币、一纸合同。
但打了这几个月,我越来越清楚它真正的性质:这是一场关于区块链初心的价值观之争。
我们这一代人创立区块链,只为一个朴素的信念:每个人都应当真正拥有自己的财产——不因你的身份、立场、国籍,不需要任何人的恩准。
私钥即所有权,这是整个行业的第一性原理。
而这场官司揭示的,恰恰是对这一初心的背叛:
一家以"自由(Liberty)"为名的公司,在WLFI与USD1合约里秘密植入了任意冻结任何用户资产的权力,不经披露、不经治理、不经任何程序——然后在我的代币解锁数日之内,对我使用了它。
以自由之名,行控制之实——这不只是对我一个人的侵害,它动摇的是这个行业存在的理由。
如果发行方可以随时没收任何持有者的资产,那么区块链和它试图取代的旧世界还有什么区别?
我们绕了一大圈,只是给任意没收换了一层技术的包装。
所以这场官司我会打到底。
不只为拿回属于我的东西,更为在法庭上确立一个先例:
在区块链的世界里,"你的资产"必须真正是你的——写在代码里,也写进判例里。
自由不是一个可以注册的商标。
它是一种可以在链上逐行验证的设计选择。
我的选择,任何人都可以去验证;他们的,法庭正在验证。
但打了这几个月,我越来越清楚它真正的性质:这是一场关于区块链初心的价值观之争。
我们这一代人创立区块链,只为一个朴素的信念:每个人都应当真正拥有自己的财产——不因你的身份、立场、国籍,不需要任何人的恩准。
私钥即所有权,这是整个行业的第一性原理。
而这场官司揭示的,恰恰是对这一初心的背叛:
一家以"自由(Liberty)"为名的公司,在WLFI与USD1合约里秘密植入了任意冻结任何用户资产的权力,不经披露、不经治理、不经任何程序——然后在我的代币解锁数日之内,对我使用了它。
以自由之名,行控制之实——这不只是对我一个人的侵害,它动摇的是这个行业存在的理由。
如果发行方可以随时没收任何持有者的资产,那么区块链和它试图取代的旧世界还有什么区别?
我们绕了一大圈,只是给任意没收换了一层技术的包装。
所以这场官司我会打到底。
不只为拿回属于我的东西,更为在法庭上确立一个先例:
在区块链的世界里,"你的资产"必须真正是你的——写在代码里,也写进判例里。
自由不是一个可以注册的商标。
它是一种可以在链上逐行验证的设计选择。
我的选择,任何人都可以去验证;他们的,法庭正在验证。
翻訳参照
Many people see my case against World Liberty @worldlibertyfi as a business dispute.
On the surface, it is — $45 million, 4 billion tokens, a contract.
But months into this fight, its true nature has become clear to me: this is a fight over the founding principle of blockchain itself.
Our generation built this industry on one simple conviction:
that every person should truly own what is theirs, regardless of who they are, what they believe, or where they were born, and without needing anyone's permission.
Your keys, your coins.
That is the first principle of everything we do.
What this case has exposed is a betrayal of that principle:
a company with "Liberty" in its name secretly embedded, in its own contract, the power to freeze any user's assets at will — without disclosure, without governance, without any process at all.
And within days of my tokens unlocking, they used it.
Freedom in the name, control in the code. That is not just an injury to me. It strikes at the reason this industry exists.
If an issuer can confiscate any holder's assets at any moment, then what separates blockchain from the old world it was built to replace?
We will have traveled all this way only to give arbitrary confiscation a technological disguise.
That is why I will see this case through.
Not only to recover what is mine, but to establish something in a court of law:
in this industry, "your assets" must actually mean yours — written in code, and now written in precedent.
Liberty is not a trademark you can register.
It is a design choice, verifiable line by line, on-chain.
Mine is open for anyone to inspect.
Theirs is being inspected by a federal court.
On the surface, it is — $45 million, 4 billion tokens, a contract.
But months into this fight, its true nature has become clear to me: this is a fight over the founding principle of blockchain itself.
Our generation built this industry on one simple conviction:
that every person should truly own what is theirs, regardless of who they are, what they believe, or where they were born, and without needing anyone's permission.
Your keys, your coins.
That is the first principle of everything we do.
What this case has exposed is a betrayal of that principle:
a company with "Liberty" in its name secretly embedded, in its own contract, the power to freeze any user's assets at will — without disclosure, without governance, without any process at all.
And within days of my tokens unlocking, they used it.
Freedom in the name, control in the code. That is not just an injury to me. It strikes at the reason this industry exists.
If an issuer can confiscate any holder's assets at any moment, then what separates blockchain from the old world it was built to replace?
We will have traveled all this way only to give arbitrary confiscation a technological disguise.
That is why I will see this case through.
Not only to recover what is mine, but to establish something in a court of law:
in this industry, "your assets" must actually mean yours — written in code, and now written in precedent.
Liberty is not a trademark you can register.
It is a design choice, verifiable line by line, on-chain.
Mine is open for anyone to inspect.
Theirs is being inspected by a federal court.
私はジェームズ・ウィン・リアルさんが、今後数日以内にポートをターボモードで再起動し、1億ドル以上にするつもりだと感じています。
それは私たちが同じことを賭けたからです。価格発見です。
匿名で、失っても構わない資金でロングをオープンすべきだと私は言います。今がその時です
それは私たちが同じことを賭けたからです。価格発見です。
匿名で、失っても構わない資金でロングをオープンすべきだと私は言います。今がその時です
$WOOのボリュームは過去7日間でほぼ50％増加しているが、価格は横ばいのまま推移している
これは通常、スマートマネーが買いを入れていることを示している
そのため、$0.064で一括購入し、$0.0630から$0.0608の間にも注文を設定した
これは通常、スマートマネーが買いを入れていることを示している
そのため、$0.064で一括購入し、$0.0630から$0.0608の間にも注文を設定した
ログインして、さらにコンテンツを読む