BlockViz.xyz

Chainlink has been doing the running here. On the indexed chart over the last 2 days, LINK finished 7.4% ahead of ETH, and the spread got as wide as 8.8% at its peak. That stands out even more with Ethereum only slightly positive in the same window $LINK

LINK set the pace against ETH in this indexed chart. It closed the window 6.1% ahead, and at one point the spread reached 10.4%. Even after that wider gap cooled, LINK still finished clearly in front $LINK

Strategy holds 840,447 BTC, about $53 billion at current prices. The immediate risk is not a forced Bitcoin sale. It is a potential forced sell from passive funds if MSCI changes how it treats companies dominated by non-operating assets. A reported MSCI simulation in May flagged names like Strategy, Metaplanet, and Yellow Cake for possible index removal. If that rule is adopted, funds tracking those benchmarks could be forced to sell MSTR in the November review window. That matters because MSTR stock is the funding engine behind the bitcoin treasury model. If index-driven selling weakens the stock and compresses its premium to NAV, Strategy could lose some flexibility to raise fresh capital and keep adding BTC at the same pace. The key dates are September 30 for the end of consultation and October 16 for the expected decision. The real signal is not whether BTC gets dumped overnight, but whether pressure on MSTR starts to weaken the machine that has been absorbing so much bitcoin. $BTC

PUMP kept the upper hand against BTC through the last 24 hours, finishing 4.5% ahead on an indexed basis. The gap got as wide as 7.1% during the window, which makes this more than a quiet drift. It is a clean example of PUMP pulling away while BTC lagged in the same stretch $PUMP

PI did not need a huge move to stand out here. In the latest indexed comparison, it finished 1.7% ahead of BTC, with the spread reaching 2.3% at its widest. In a relative performance chart, PI is the one holding the edge right now $PI

Le CPI a refroidi, mais le Bitcoin n’a toujours pas réussi à franchir la résistance. Cela vous dit que le problème ne vient pas uniquement de l’inflation. L’annonce est ressortie plus douce, mais elle correspondait aux attentes : le marché a donc obtenu une confirmation, pas une surprise réelle. En général, ce n’est pas suffisant pour attirer de nouveaux acheteurs. Le BTC reste bloqué dans la fourchette de 62 000 $ à 66 000 $, et les vendeurs continuent d’apparaître autour de 65 000 $ à 66 000 $. Le dernier rejet indique que la demande au comptant n’est toujours pas assez forte pour pousser le prix au-dessus de la résistance ; et avec une liquidité plus faible, les deux camps restent exposés à des mouvements brusques de squeeze. Le contexte macro s’est amélioré, mais pas assez pour verrouiller un pivot clair de la Fed. Cela maintient au premier plan les taux, le dollar, les données sur l’emploi et la prochaine publication sur l’inflation. Tant que les anticipations de taux n’évoluent pas de manière plus décisive, le Bitcoin pourrait continuer à considérer les bonnes nouvelles macro comme une occasion de vendre la hausse plutôt que de poursuivre l’ascension. La carte reste simple : une clôture quotidienne au-dessus de 66 000 $ à 67 000 $ commencerait à rompre la fourchette et remettrait 70 000 $ à 72 000 $ sur la table. Si cette reconquête échoue, 62 000 $ reste vulnérable, avec 60 000 $ comme support plus profond. Pour l’instant, un CPI plus faible, à lui seul, ne suffit pas à modifier la structure. $BTC

OKB did more than just edge out BTC here, it built real separation. On the indexed chart, OKB finished roughly 7% ahead over the past 24 hours, and at its widest point the spread reached 9.2%. That makes this less about a small lead and more about sustained relative strength through the session $OKB

ETH kept the edge over BTC across the last two days. On the indexed chart, it finished 1.4% ahead, with the spread widening to 1.8% at its peak. That makes this a clean read on relative strength, not just a flat market move $ETH

Harmony’s ONE supply shock was not a normal sell-off. The bigger problem is that roughly 4 billion ONE were allegedly minted through a verification flaw, and about 2.8 billion reportedly made their way to exchanges before supply trackers fully reflected what had happened. That kind of lag matters. Price can look temporarily normal while order books are already taking in a huge hidden wave of supply. The suspected flaw sits in Harmony’s cross-shard receipt verification. Forged receipts reportedly passed checks with empty signatures because the system appears to have validated committee size, not whether real validators had actually signed. If replay protection was also weak, the same fake receipt pattern could be reused to mint again and again. For holders, this was immediate dilution, not just panic selling. The reported mint equaled about 26% of the prior supply, which meant the attacker could dump into liquidity while everyone else was suddenly holding a smaller piece of the network. What matters now is containment. Watch for validator patching, exchange action on linked deposits, any rollback decision, and whether on-chain supply data finally matches exchange-side figures. Until that gap closes, any rebound in ONE is trading against unresolved inflation and broken trust.

DOGE set the pace against ETH over the last 24 hours, closing 1.5% ahead on the indexed chart. The gap got as wide as 3.6% during the window, so the story here is not just the lead, but how much relative strength DOGE managed to build before that spread narrowed $DOGE

Ninety wallets now hold 10,000 BTC or more, a six-month high, while millions of smaller holders are cutting exposure. That is the real BTC story right now, and it explains why price can feel heavy even as large addresses quietly stack. On-chain data shows these 90 elite wallets added six addresses over the last eight weeks, a 7.1 percent rise, as micro wallet balances shrank through August. Retail capitulation, driven by hardware wallet hacks and regulatory uncertainty, is creating supply pockets for better-capitalized buyers. This rotation historically reduces downside volatility and can set the stage for upward pressure, though some of the wallet count shift may reflect custody reshuffling rather than pure new buying. Why does this matter now? The market is stuck in a choppy range that grinds down small accounts. Stops get hit, leverage gets squeezed, and the instinct is to exit. Whales do not have that problem. They have size, time, and better access to liquidity. When sentiment is pinned in fear and open interest is lean, their accumulation can set up a fast move if a catalyst hits, whether that is a macro surprise, a shift in ETF flows, or a liquidation cascade. Watch three things. First, the whale-retail positioning gap on major venues. When large accounts lean long and retail leans short, the market is coiled. Second, exchange inflows from big wallets. A sudden spike in large deposits can signal distribution, while continued quiet accumulation supports the bull case. Third, the reaction around key levels. If BTC holds support on heavy retail selling and whales keep adding, the next impulsive move is more likely to be up. If large wallets start dumping into strength, the narrative flips fast. Ninety wallets versus millions of sellers. One side is patient, the other is panicked. The n... $BTC

Saylor sold 1,690 BTC. Wall Street bought more than $853 million through U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs last week. That is the real tension. Strategy sold roughly $108.6 million worth of Bitcoin at an average price of $64,262, while institutional demand returned across all five ETF sessions. The sale was used to repurchase STRC preferred shares trading below their $100 par value and strengthen Strategy’s cash position. So this is not a clean reversal of Saylor’s Bitcoin thesis. It is a financing decision. But the market should not ignore the shift. Strategy was once viewed as a relentless source of BTC demand. Now it is also a potential source of supply whenever dividends, buybacks, or balance-sheet pressure become more important. The next move matters more than this sale. If ETF inflows continue, the market can absorb Strategy’s selling without much damage. If ETF demand weakens while Strategy keeps reducing its stack, the “always buying” narrative will face its biggest test yet. $BTC

Bitcoin whales are buying the dip while the market is still waiting for proof. Large holders have accumulated more than 20,000 BTC since July 29, worth around $1.2 billion. At the same time, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded more than $754 million in weekly inflows. That is meaningful demand entering the market while BTC remains below $65,000. The catch is that accumulation does not automatically mean an instant breakout. Bitcoin still needs to reclaim resistance with strength. A clean move above $65,000 could reopen the path toward $70,000, while a rejection and loss of the mid-$60,000 area would show that sellers still have control. For now, the key signal is the divergence between positioning and price. Whales are adding, smaller holders are reducing exposure, and Bitcoin is moving sideways. Watch ETF flows, exchange deposits, and the next daily close above $65,000. If supply keeps getting absorbed, this range may be the quiet phase before the next major move. $BTC

Dogecoin a terminé juillet 2026 à -3,4 %. Si vous n’aviez conservé que les meilleurs jours, le rendement bondit à +23,6 %, tandis que les manquer le ferait chuter à -21,8 %. Cela vous indique que le mois a été porté par quelques séances particulièrement marquantes plutôt que par une tendance régulière et solide. Le plus grand jour de hausse a été le 3/7/26 (+4,6 %), et le jour le plus difficile a été le 24/7/26 (-4,2 %) $DOGE

85 bogues critiques dans les applications Bitcoin ne sont pas une défaillance du protocole Bitcoin. C’est un avertissement concernant la couche logicielle où les utilisateurs créent des clés, signent des transactions et déplacent des fonds. Une revue coordonnée a signalé 4 962 problèmes potentiels dans 390 projets liés à Bitcoin, dont 85 critiques et 635 signalements à haute sévérité. Tous les problèmes ne sont pas exploitables, mais l’ampleur est impossible à ignorer. Les attaquants n’ont pas besoin de casser Bitcoin s’ils peuvent casser les outils qui l’enveloppent. Les bogues les plus dangereux sont ceux que les utilisateurs ne peuvent pas détecter : génération de seed prévisible, logique de signature défaillante, dépendances non sûres ou vulnérabilités dans l’infrastructure des portefeuilles et des échanges. Un portefeuille « cold » n’est aussi sûr que le code qui a créé ses clés. Maintenant, observez la réponse, pas seulement le titre. Les signaux clés sont les exploits confirmés, les versions concernées, les correctifs d’urgence et la nécessité pour les utilisateurs de migrer des fonds plutôt que de simplement mettre à jour le logiciel. Bitcoin peut rester intact au niveau du protocole tandis que la plus faible application de la pile devient la véritable surface d’attaque. $BTC

XRP finished July 2026 at +2.2%. If you held only the best days, the return jumps to +25.0%, while missing them drops it to -18.3%. That tells you the month was driven by a handful of outsized sessions rather than smooth trend strength. The biggest upside day was 7/14/26 (+4.4%), and the roughest day was 7/27/26 (-4.1%) $XRP

SpaceX se fait frapper avant même que le déblocage ne s’ouvre. C’est le point dont les traders devraient le plus s’inquiéter, car une baisse de 11 % avant que 911,5 millions d’actions deviennent éligibles à la vente n’est pas un simple bruit normal. Le marché vous dit que l’offre arrive et que personne ne veut se mettre en travers. C’est exactement ainsi que le sentiment se dégrade. D’abord l’action perd de l’élan, puis le blocage devient l’excuse, ensuite tout le monde qui est en gains essaie de se placer en avance sur tout le monde. Quand une valeur de type « story stock » commence à se comporter ainsi, elle finit généralement par entraîner tout le segment du risque avec elle. C’est pour cela que l’angle crypto est important. Si l’argent se retire réellement de la position SpaceX, le BTC devrait le ressentir seulement si les acheteurs choisissent ce dernier comme prochaine « maison du risque ». Sinon, le cash se désengage et reste à l’écart. Pas de rotation nette : seulement moins d’appétit. Pour les traders, la clé à surveiller maintenant est simple : est-ce que SpaceX continue de saigner après le déblocage, et est-ce que le Bitcoin peut tenir bon pendant que cela se produit. Si le BTC reste résilient pendant que SpaceX se déprécie, c’est le signal de rotation le plus clair. Si les deux s’affaiblissent en même temps, il s’agit d’un repositionnement de liquidité, pas d’un pari sur la crypto. $BTC

Cardano finished July 2026 at +16%. If you held only the best days, the return jumps to +66.0%, while missing them drops it to -29.9%. That tells you the month was driven by a handful of outsized sessions rather than smooth trend strength. The biggest upside day was 7/3/26 (+11.5%), and the roughest day was 7/27/26 (-6.7%) $ADA

$38M to $114M in four days. That is the part that should make Bitcoin holders pause. The Coldcard drain is not fading, it is compounding, and that tells you this is now a trust event, not just a theft story. The sharp edge here is simple. Cold storage is supposed to be the safest part of the stack. When a seed-generation flaw can ripple through more wallets days later, the market is forced to rethink what “self-custody” really means in practice. Bitcoin itself is not the problem. But confidence is. Every new address tied to the exploit keeps the pressure on holders, especially the ones who assumed older hardware and older seeds were still fine. That is where the market tension sits now. What matters next is whether the number of exposed wallets keeps rising, whether large holders move coins defensively, and whether this starts a broader reset in how serious users store size. If the totals keep climbing, this is still an active risk story. If they flatten, the market can start pricing it as contained. $BTC

Solana finished July 2026 at -0.99%. If you held only the best days, the return jumps to +27.0%, while missing them drops it to -22.0%. That tells you the month was driven by a handful of outsized sessions rather than smooth trend strength. The biggest upside day was 7/1/26 (+5.2%), and the roughest day was 7/24/26 (-4.8%) $SOL