AbdullRauf
8.2k Publications
AbdullRauf
Binance Square VérifiéHi Guys i am Spot trader specialist in Intra Daytrade, DCA and Swing trade. Follow me tostay updated about market and Binance reward Campaigns.
Ouvert au trading
Trade fréquemment
1.3 an(s)
1.1K+ Suivis
30.6K+ Abonnés
27.5K+ J’aime
Publications
Portefeuille
Tous
Citations
Vidéos
Direct
PINNED
YOUR SUPPORT = OUR THANKS. 2000 GIFTS, GO! 🚀🎁💐
Square Family, you rock! 🧧 To celebrate YOU, we’re giving away 2000 GIFTS. Let’s go!
How to enter:
👉 Follow us
👉 Share this post
👉 Comment “666”
Random draws. Huge wins. Enter now!
Square Family, you rock! 🧧 To celebrate YOU, we’re giving away 2000 GIFTS. Let’s go!
How to enter:
👉 Follow us
👉 Share this post
👉 Comment “666”
Random draws. Huge wins. Enter now!
Aria
Aria Bloom 阿莉娅
·
--
HaussierStay focused keep learning, and make every move with confidence. 🚀
The crypto journey is all about continuous learning, smart decisions and staying consistent. 💛
Let’s keep growing together with Binance.
#BinanceSquareTalks #cryptouniverseofficial $TUT $BTC
The crypto journey is all about continuous learning, smart decisions and staying consistent. 💛
Let’s keep growing together with Binance.
#BinanceSquareTalks #cryptouniverseofficial $TUT $BTC
Mr Huzzi
MR-HUZZI
·
--
Haussierhello everyone
claim box
thanks
claim box
thanks
night
Night King Official
·
--
🚨 GIVEAWAY LIVE! 🎁
3,000 Red Packets are up for grabs! 🔥
✅ Follow
🔁 Repost
💬 Comment "666"
🎁 Claim Reward
Who’s ready? 👀
3,000 Red Packets are up for grabs! 🔥
✅ Follow
🔁 Repost
💬 Comment "666"
🎁 Claim Reward
Who’s ready? 👀
Shaheen
Shaheen 69
·
--
🎁 BINANCE PUT ALL THE GIFTS IN ONE BASKET! 🟡
Imagine one basket filled with Airdrops, Red Packets, Trading Rewards, Token Vouchers, CreatorPad rewards, Write-to-Earn opportunities and VIP benefits. 🚀
That’s what makes the Binance ecosystem exciting — it’s not only about trading, but also about discovering new opportunities, participating in campaigns and sharing rewards with the community.
And today, Shaheen69 is opening the gift basket for YOU! 🎉
I’m sharing Red Packet rewards with all of you as a small thank-you for your continued support and love. ❤️
Good luck everyone! 🍀
Who will grab the reward? 👀
#Binance #BNB #redpacket
Imagine one basket filled with Airdrops, Red Packets, Trading Rewards, Token Vouchers, CreatorPad rewards, Write-to-Earn opportunities and VIP benefits. 🚀
That’s what makes the Binance ecosystem exciting — it’s not only about trading, but also about discovering new opportunities, participating in campaigns and sharing rewards with the community.
And today, Shaheen69 is opening the gift basket for YOU! 🎉
I’m sharing Red Packet rewards with all of you as a small thank-you for your continued support and love. ❤️
Good luck everyone! 🍀
Who will grab the reward? 👀
#Binance #BNB #redpacket
suadagar
Suadagar Ali
·
--
#BNB $
follow ☘️🥀🌹like
comments repost
follow ☘️🥀🌹like
comments repost
muzamil
Muzamil Abbas⁷⁵ 穆扎米尔_阿巴斯
·
--
Haussier🎁 $SHIB GIVEAWAY WORTH $100 🎁
I’m giving away SHIB Gift Boxes to 3,000 lucky people! 🐕🔥
To participate:
❤️ Like this post ✅
🔁 Repost this post ✅
💬 Comment “1” below ✅
🎁 Claim your Gift Box ✅
Good luck everyone🚀✨
#SHIB #Giveaway #Binance #CryptoGiveaway
najaf
NAJAF_加密 143
·
--
Solana (SOL): The High-Speed Crypto Engine 🚀
Solana is one of the top cryptocurrencies, currently trading around $85 with a massive market cap placing it firmly among the top layer-1 networks.
Why It Matters:
⚡ Blazing Speed: Processes thousands of transactions per second via its unique Proof-of-History mechanism.
💸 Micro Fees: Average transactions cost fractions of a cent, making micro-payments practical.
🌐 Ecosystem Hub: Powers DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 apps at scale.
Solana solves crypto’s scaling problem, combining speed, affordability, and utility.
#Solana #Crypto #SOL
#ClaimNow #BinanceSquareFamily
Solana is one of the top cryptocurrencies, currently trading around $85 with a massive market cap placing it firmly among the top layer-1 networks.
Why It Matters:
⚡ Blazing Speed: Processes thousands of transactions per second via its unique Proof-of-History mechanism.
💸 Micro Fees: Average transactions cost fractions of a cent, making micro-payments practical.
🌐 Ecosystem Hub: Powers DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 apps at scale.
Solana solves crypto’s scaling problem, combining speed, affordability, and utility.
#Solana #Crypto #SOL
#ClaimNow #BinanceSquareFamily
BTC
BTC 222
·
--
Kalshi takes legal blow in court ruling confirming state powers over prediction markets
This latest U.S. appeals court ruling sets up a rift between federal courts on event contracts, suggesting the U.S. Supreme Court may need to settle the matter.
$BTC
This latest U.S. appeals court ruling sets up a rift between federal courts on event contracts, suggesting the U.S. Supreme Court may need to settle the matter.
$BTC
bilverse
Bilverse
·
--
🧧 BIG SOL IS WAITING INSIDE THESE RED PACKETS… 🧧
The Solana Red Packets are ready with BIG Rewards sitting inside! 💜💚
💰 Want to claim yours?
👇 3 SIMPLE STEPS:
1️⃣ FOLLOW my account
2️⃣ ❤️ LIKE this post
3️⃣ 💬 COMMENT “294” below to claim 🎁
Don’t wait until the Red Packets are gone. 👀
SOL community, make some noise! ⚡️
Click here to DOUBLE your Rewards! 🧧🚀
🌌 SOL TO THE MOON 🚀
#SOL #RedPacketMission #Bilverse #CryptoCommunity
The Solana Red Packets are ready with BIG Rewards sitting inside! 💜💚
💰 Want to claim yours?
👇 3 SIMPLE STEPS:
1️⃣ FOLLOW my account
2️⃣ ❤️ LIKE this post
3️⃣ 💬 COMMENT “294” below to claim 🎁
Don’t wait until the Red Packets are gone. 👀
SOL community, make some noise! ⚡️
Click here to DOUBLE your Rewards! 🧧🚀
🌌 SOL TO THE MOON 🚀
#SOL #RedPacketMission #Bilverse #CryptoCommunity
Ahmed
Ahmed Ali Nizamani
·
--
🚨✨Creators, this could be your next big opportunity!✨✨✨
The Binance Creator Network just launched and is welcoming emerging creators in crypto, finance & tech.
👉You don’t need a huge following, just a passion for content creation ✍️
👉Learn more & Apply ⤵️
https://www.binance.com/en/learn/creatornetwork
#creatornetwork $BNB
The Binance Creator Network just launched and is welcoming emerging creators in crypto, finance & tech.
👉You don’t need a huge following, just a passion for content creation ✍️
👉Learn more & Apply ⤵️
https://www.binance.com/en/learn/creatornetwork
#creatornetwork $BNB
ruxo
RuXo
·
--
🚨 🧧$ONG Volatility Wave! Price Up +17.62% as Gainer Consolidates After Massive Spike! 🚀📈👇🎁
Ontology Gas ($ONG) is navigating an intense volatility cycle on its spot trading chart, currently trading at $0.11873! After breaking out aggressively from its accumulation base near the 24h Low ($0.09199), massive buyer momentum drove price action to touch session peaks at the 24h High ($0.26000) before facing heavy distribution and returning to retest baseline support. Backed by a massive $80.80M USDT daily trading volume pool (535.92M ONG traded), the market is battling for range equilibrium as a top Gainer. Set your parameters immediately:
🟢 LONG ENTRY (Breakout Continuation):
✅ Trigger: Close ABOVE $0.13500 🎯 Targets: $0.16500 | $0.21000+ 🚀 🛑 SL: $0.10800
🔴 SHORT ENTRY (Range Breakdown Play):
✅ Trigger: Close BELOW $0.10500 🎯 Targets: $0.09200 | $0.07800- 📉 🛑 SL: $0.12500
💡 TRADER'S WISDOM: Take careful note of the timeframe setup—this technical analysis maps directly to the active 1-hour (1h) timeline structure! While the macro 24h performance is running strong in the green (+17.62%), the immediate active 1H candlestick confirms a localized consolidation pause after a steep wick rejection, printing a negative progression tick of -0.45% (-0.00054). Avoid rushing into over-leveraged market orders inside volatile post-spike consolidation zones—let the 1H timeframe secure a clean candle close completely outside these parameters to validate sustainable volume absorption before taking entries. Capital preservation is priority number one! 📊🔒
⚠️ High-velocity Gainer assets experiencing sharp wick spikes and subsequent retracements carry intense localized leverage flushes and wide volatility swings. Tighten your risk parameters and do your own research (DYOR)! ⚠️
➡️ CLICK THE TAGGED $ONG COIN LINK BELOW ⬅️
#BinanceSquare #Ongusdt #OntologyGas #TechnicalAnalysis #CryptoTrading
Ontology Gas ($ONG) is navigating an intense volatility cycle on its spot trading chart, currently trading at $0.11873! After breaking out aggressively from its accumulation base near the 24h Low ($0.09199), massive buyer momentum drove price action to touch session peaks at the 24h High ($0.26000) before facing heavy distribution and returning to retest baseline support. Backed by a massive $80.80M USDT daily trading volume pool (535.92M ONG traded), the market is battling for range equilibrium as a top Gainer. Set your parameters immediately:
🟢 LONG ENTRY (Breakout Continuation):
✅ Trigger: Close ABOVE $0.13500 🎯 Targets: $0.16500 | $0.21000+ 🚀 🛑 SL: $0.10800
🔴 SHORT ENTRY (Range Breakdown Play):
✅ Trigger: Close BELOW $0.10500 🎯 Targets: $0.09200 | $0.07800- 📉 🛑 SL: $0.12500
💡 TRADER'S WISDOM: Take careful note of the timeframe setup—this technical analysis maps directly to the active 1-hour (1h) timeline structure! While the macro 24h performance is running strong in the green (+17.62%), the immediate active 1H candlestick confirms a localized consolidation pause after a steep wick rejection, printing a negative progression tick of -0.45% (-0.00054). Avoid rushing into over-leveraged market orders inside volatile post-spike consolidation zones—let the 1H timeframe secure a clean candle close completely outside these parameters to validate sustainable volume absorption before taking entries. Capital preservation is priority number one! 📊🔒
⚠️ High-velocity Gainer assets experiencing sharp wick spikes and subsequent retracements carry intense localized leverage flushes and wide volatility swings. Tighten your risk parameters and do your own research (DYOR)! ⚠️
➡️ CLICK THE TAGGED $ONG COIN LINK BELOW ⬅️
#BinanceSquare #Ongusdt #OntologyGas #TechnicalAnalysis #CryptoTrading
go
AbdullRauf
·
--
YOUR SUPPORT = OUR THANKS. 2000 GIFTS, GO! 🚀🎁💐
Square Family, you rock! 🧧 To celebrate YOU, we’re giving away 2000 GIFTS. Let’s go!
How to enter:
👉 Follow us
👉 Share this post
👉 Comment “666”
Random draws. Huge wins. Enter now!
Square Family, you rock! 🧧 To celebrate YOU, we’re giving away 2000 GIFTS. Let’s go!
How to enter:
👉 Follow us
👉 Share this post
👉 Comment “666”
Random draws. Huge wins. Enter now!
Vérifié
At first I assumed the two transaction models on Dusk were just a privacy toggle. Public or private. One switch. Simple choice.
The actual difference runs deeper than that.
Moonlight works like Ethereum. Your account has a nonce. Every transaction increments it publicly. Anyone can see your balance, your history, your sequence. The nonce is a counter. It is also a trail.
Phoenix works differently. There is no account. No visible balance. No sequential counter. Instead, when you spend a note, you produce a nullifier. The network records that nullifier and knows the note is gone. But it cannot link the nullifier back to the note it came from. The spending is provable. The identity of what was spent is not.
That distinction matters more than it sounds. In Moonlight, your transaction history is a readable story. In Phoenix, the network knows chapters are being written without knowing what they say.
What I keep thinking about is which institutions actually want which model. A bank processing a settlement might need Moonlight for audit trails. A fund executing a strategy might need Phoenix to avoid front-running. Both can live on the same chain. Neither forces the other to compromise.
What I cannot find in the documentation is how regulators treat nullifiers as evidence. A nonce proves sequence. A nullifier proves spending without revealing the note. Are those legally equivalent in a compliance context?
What do you think — when a regulator asks for proof of transaction, does a nullifier satisfy the requirement or does it just raise a harder question?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
The actual difference runs deeper than that.
Moonlight works like Ethereum. Your account has a nonce. Every transaction increments it publicly. Anyone can see your balance, your history, your sequence. The nonce is a counter. It is also a trail.
Phoenix works differently. There is no account. No visible balance. No sequential counter. Instead, when you spend a note, you produce a nullifier. The network records that nullifier and knows the note is gone. But it cannot link the nullifier back to the note it came from. The spending is provable. The identity of what was spent is not.
That distinction matters more than it sounds. In Moonlight, your transaction history is a readable story. In Phoenix, the network knows chapters are being written without knowing what they say.
What I keep thinking about is which institutions actually want which model. A bank processing a settlement might need Moonlight for audit trails. A fund executing a strategy might need Phoenix to avoid front-running. Both can live on the same chain. Neither forces the other to compromise.
What I cannot find in the documentation is how regulators treat nullifiers as evidence. A nonce proves sequence. A nullifier proves spending without revealing the note. Are those legally equivalent in a compliance context?
What do you think — when a regulator asks for proof of transaction, does a nullifier satisfy the requirement or does it just raise a harder question?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Privacy bolted onto EVM is not the same as privacy built in from day one.#dusk
AbdullRauf
·
--
At first I assumed adding privacy to an EVM environment was the same as building privacy from the start. From the outside the two look similar. On the inside they are not.
The EVM account model carries a structural assumption. Addresses persist. Activity accumulates. Even when individual transactions are encrypted, the account itself becomes a pattern over time. Hedger adds confidentiality on top of that model. Transaction data can become opaque. The account structure remains visible.
So the real question is narrower. When Hedger encrypts a transaction, what exactly is hidden and what is not? Amounts and internal logic may stay private. The fact that this account interacted with this contract at this time is often still visible. In regulated finance, who traded with whom and when can matter as much as what they traded.
This is not a flaw in the design. Account-based EVM is practical for developers. Hedger is a real privacy layer. The risk is misunderstanding. A privacy layer that people overestimate can be more dangerous than no privacy layer at all.
Does transaction-level confidentiality give institutions enough protection, or does the account model underneath quietly limit the whole promise?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
The EVM account model carries a structural assumption. Addresses persist. Activity accumulates. Even when individual transactions are encrypted, the account itself becomes a pattern over time. Hedger adds confidentiality on top of that model. Transaction data can become opaque. The account structure remains visible.
So the real question is narrower. When Hedger encrypts a transaction, what exactly is hidden and what is not? Amounts and internal logic may stay private. The fact that this account interacted with this contract at this time is often still visible. In regulated finance, who traded with whom and when can matter as much as what they traded.
This is not a flaw in the design. Account-based EVM is practical for developers. Hedger is a real privacy layer. The risk is misunderstanding. A privacy layer that people overestimate can be more dangerous than no privacy layer at all.
Does transaction-level confidentiality give institutions enough protection, or does the account model underneath quietly limit the whole promise?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Vérifié
I used to look at a new consensus design and ask one question first. How does an attacker break this?
Studying Dusk changed that habit. With Succinct Attestation, a different scenario appears. Imagine you are already selected to generate a block in a later iteration. You are also voting on the current one. Do you help the current block succeed and take the voter reward, or stay quiet so the iteration fails and your future generator position improves?
That is the Future Generator Incentive Problem. It does not come from outside. It comes from the incentives available to a legitimate participant.
Dusk’s response was to reshape those incentives. Separate generator and voter rewards. Exclude the next-iteration generator from current voting. Limit how many iterations can run.
There is a trade-off. Every extra incentive rule adds another assumption that still needs to hold under pressure.
The real game underneath the cryptography is whether the most rational move stays the honest one.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Studying Dusk changed that habit. With Succinct Attestation, a different scenario appears. Imagine you are already selected to generate a block in a later iteration. You are also voting on the current one. Do you help the current block succeed and take the voter reward, or stay quiet so the iteration fails and your future generator position improves?
That is the Future Generator Incentive Problem. It does not come from outside. It comes from the incentives available to a legitimate participant.
Dusk’s response was to reshape those incentives. Separate generator and voter rewards. Exclude the next-iteration generator from current voting. Limit how many iterations can run.
There is a trade-off. Every extra incentive rule adds another assumption that still needs to hold under pressure.
The real game underneath the cryptography is whether the most rational move stays the honest one.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
$DUSK Is Down 93%… Yet Holding Partnerships and a €200M+ Issuance Pipeline Most Protocols at This Price Don’t Have
AbdullRauf
·
--
Spent time trying to read two signals that point in different directions. The price is down ninety-three percent from its all-time high. The NPEX partnership is live. A confirmed issuance pipeline of over two hundred million euros exists. The Boreas upgrade shipped in May. Those two pictures do not belong to the same narrative. One suggests a project that failed to hold its launch momentum. The other suggests a project that kept building while the price declined. Infrastructure tokens have a timing problem that equity markets do not. A company's stock price and its revenue usually move in the same direction over time. A protocol's token price and its actual usage can diverge for years. The price reflects what traders think today. The usage reflects what institutions decided months ago. What I cannot reconcile is the gap between the confirmed issuance number and the daily trading volume. Two hundred million euros in pipeline against three and a half million in daily volume is a wide distance. Either the issuance has not reached the chain yet or volume is not the right measure. @Dusk has partnerships that most protocols at this price would not. Whether that eventually shows up in the price or just in the history books is the question price charts were never designed to answer. When price and adoption diverge this far, which one is lying?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
At first I assumed adding privacy to an EVM environment was the same as building privacy from the start. From the outside the two look similar. On the inside they are not.
The EVM account model carries a structural assumption. Addresses persist. Activity accumulates. Even when individual transactions are encrypted, the account itself becomes a pattern over time. Hedger adds confidentiality on top of that model. Transaction data can become opaque. The account structure remains visible.
So the real question is narrower. When Hedger encrypts a transaction, what exactly is hidden and what is not? Amounts and internal logic may stay private. The fact that this account interacted with this contract at this time is often still visible. In regulated finance, who traded with whom and when can matter as much as what they traded.
This is not a flaw in the design. Account-based EVM is practical for developers. Hedger is a real privacy layer. The risk is misunderstanding. A privacy layer that people overestimate can be more dangerous than no privacy layer at all.
Does transaction-level confidentiality give institutions enough protection, or does the account model underneath quietly limit the whole promise?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
The EVM account model carries a structural assumption. Addresses persist. Activity accumulates. Even when individual transactions are encrypted, the account itself becomes a pattern over time. Hedger adds confidentiality on top of that model. Transaction data can become opaque. The account structure remains visible.
So the real question is narrower. When Hedger encrypts a transaction, what exactly is hidden and what is not? Amounts and internal logic may stay private. The fact that this account interacted with this contract at this time is often still visible. In regulated finance, who traded with whom and when can matter as much as what they traded.
This is not a flaw in the design. Account-based EVM is practical for developers. Hedger is a real privacy layer. The risk is misunderstanding. A privacy layer that people overestimate can be more dangerous than no privacy layer at all.
Does transaction-level confidentiality give institutions enough protection, or does the account model underneath quietly limit the whole promise?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
At first I assumed adding privacy to an EVM environment was the same as building privacy from the start. From the outside the two look similar. On the inside they are not.
The EVM account model carries a structural assumption. Addresses persist. Activity accumulates. Even when individual transactions are encrypted, the account itself becomes a pattern over time. Hedger adds confidentiality on top of that model. Transaction data can become opaque. The account structure remains visible.
So the real question is narrower. When Hedger encrypts a transaction, what exactly is hidden and what is not? Amounts and internal logic may stay private. The fact that this account interacted with this contract at this time is often still visible. In regulated finance, who traded with whom and when can matter as much as what they traded.
This is not a flaw in the design. Account-based EVM is practical for developers. Hedger is a real privacy layer. The risk is misunderstanding. A privacy layer that people overestimate can be more dangerous than no privacy layer at all.
Does transaction-level confidentiality give institutions enough protection, or does the account model underneath quietly limit the whole promise?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
The EVM account model carries a structural assumption. Addresses persist. Activity accumulates. Even when individual transactions are encrypted, the account itself becomes a pattern over time. Hedger adds confidentiality on top of that model. Transaction data can become opaque. The account structure remains visible.
So the real question is narrower. When Hedger encrypts a transaction, what exactly is hidden and what is not? Amounts and internal logic may stay private. The fact that this account interacted with this contract at this time is often still visible. In regulated finance, who traded with whom and when can matter as much as what they traded.
This is not a flaw in the design. Account-based EVM is practical for developers. Hedger is a real privacy layer. The risk is misunderstanding. A privacy layer that people overestimate can be more dangerous than no privacy layer at all.
Does transaction-level confidentiality give institutions enough protection, or does the account model underneath quietly limit the whole promise?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
At first I assumed appearing on the leaderboard was enough.
Spent time checking the rules and realized verification is the real gate.
Today is the only window.
Binance Wallet → Discover → Booster → TermMax → Square task → Complete & Verify.
Miss this step and the ranking means nothing
The quiet work of confirming still decides who actually gets paid.
@TermMax
#TermMax
Spent time checking the rules and realized verification is the real gate.
Today is the only window.
Binance Wallet → Discover → Booster → TermMax → Square task → Complete & Verify.
Miss this step and the ranking means nothing
The quiet work of confirming still decides who actually gets paid.
@TermMax
#TermMax
Connectez-vous pour découvrir plus de contenu