麒麟送财

Last night, I kept flipping through the RWA track several times. After the @Dusk mainnet went live, I focused on digging into the NPEX case.

Officially, they said they’ve spent six years polishing it. I was just curious at first. But when I looked at NPEX—it’s a bona fide regulated European securities exchange that has actually moved more than $300 million worth of securities under management onto the chain—the attitude in me changed. This isn’t “future collaboration” from a whitepaper; it’s a licensed institution truly bringing assets over.

$DUSK What interests me most is that it doesn’t treat privacy and transparency as opposites. At the protocol layer, it builds two separate ledgers: Moonlight is fully public, following standard public-chain logic; Phoenix, on the other hand, masks details. Institutions can choose based on the scenario: retail users go with public transparency for easier auditing, while large or sensitive transactions use the shielded path. This is far more practical than simply shouting “privacy.” It’s much closer to tiered disclosure in traditional finance.

From the technical side, DuskEVM is compatible with Solidity, so DeFi from Ethereum can be migrated and enhanced with privacy features. The privacy module Hedger uses homomorphic encryption plus zero-knowledge proofs—completely different from approaches that only obfuscate addresses.

But after reading the market infrastructure documentation for it, I actually think the hardest part of RWA isn’t issuing—it’s what comes after. Real-world securities can lose keys, face fraud, have changing qualifications, and involve dividend and buyback processes with splits. Dusk directly builds Recovery, Remediation, and Corporate Actions into the requirements for regulated assets. Once a Token is issued, it can only be transferred; yes, it’s decentralized, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it can function as truly tradable financial assets. So when I look at RWA now, I care more about whether the protocol has a handling path when things go wrong.

On staking: the official site shows that over 210 million tokens are participating. Running consensus directly requires a minimum of 1,000 tokens, nodes must stay online, and there are both soft and hard penalties for being offline or acting maliciously. The security budget isn’t low, but early rewards rely mostly on token issuance, and fees make up a relatively small share. The proof-of-lock mechanism shows that token holders are willing to participate in security, but that’s still not the same as having the network genuinely used. A healthy cycle should be: applications drive trading, and trading sustains security.

Putting it all together, my understanding of #Dusk is this: Dusk holds the first genuinely licensed “real gold and silver” asset brought on-chain, which is far more convincing than pure talk. But NPEX, at the end of the day, is still a Europe story. Whether it can be replicated in other jurisdictions—that’s the hurdle for turning a regional experiment into foundational infrastructure.

Yesterday I went through the whitepaper for @TermMax again. This time, I didn’t get led astray by all those formulas. What really made me stop and think were three points.

First, what problem is it actually trying to solve? On-chain lending interest rates are as wild as a roller coaster—5% today, double tomorrow. Borrowing costs can’t be calculated in advance at all. TermMax’s approach is straightforward: how long you borrow, how much you borrow, and how much interest you pay—locked in once and for all. Lenders know exactly how much they can earn, and borrowers know exactly how much they’ll owe at maturity. The official core is eight words: fixed interest rate, fixed term. Then, by splitting the principal (FT) and the interest (XT) and using an AMM, it becomes a tradable fixed-income market. In plain terms, it’s like adding “term insurance” to on-chain loans.

So, is there real money actually being used? You can’t just take the marketing at face value. I went and checked DeFiLlama specifically: TVL is currently about $31.25 million, active loans are around $27.2 million, and protocol revenue over the last 30 days is approximately $199,000. The historical peak may be higher, but these current numbers are what matter most.

Second, look at the mechanism itself: it brings Uniswap V3’s concentrated liquidity model into interest rates. One chunk of money is split into FT and XT. Users set different APR ranges themselves; depending on the borrowing size, the effective interest rate lands at different points. Range Orders are especially interesting—not a single take-it-or-leave-it price, but multiple segments forming a curve. When large capital crosses multiple ranges, the average cost can deviate from the starting APR. So when I look at the page now, I pay attention to the curve position, the remaining depth, and the maturity date—not just one number.

Finally, the one I care about most: after it gets big, how much can TMX capture? The total supply is fixed at 1 billion. Initial circulating supply is about 20%. Revenue mainly comes from trading fees, protocol fees, and liquidation fees. TMX handles governance and incentives. The roadmap has shifted from lending toward RWA, interest rate swaps, options, and institutional products—so the room for imagination is definitely expanding. #TermMax

In the end, fixed-rate products have been missing in DeFi for far too long. TermMax is among the earliest projects to bring structured products on-chain. But the complexity of the mechanism means user education costs are high, and liquidity depth and adoption still need to be validated over time.

Lastly, I’ll just add my vote and ask what everyone thinks:

Which part of TermMax do you find most compelling?

I’ve been focusing on fixed-rate borrowing and lending lately, and @TermMax really stood out to me.

In simple terms: on Aave and Compound, you borrow and repay while the interest rate keeps moving with the market day to day—today it might be 2%, and tomorrow it could jump to 10%, which makes you feel uneasy. TermMax is different. It packages lending positions of different maturities into a token—if you want to borrow for 3 months, the interest is effectively locked in from the start, like getting a fixed-term loan from a bank. Lenders can also lock in the yield to maturity in advance without having to keep watching market fluctuations.

I looked into how it works, and it’s genuinely practical. It supports one-click leveraged looping, so you don’t have to keep manually cycling things back and forth. It also includes range orders, automatic position rolling, and even direct strategy integrations with Aave and Morpho. What I find especially interesting is that on BNB Chain, it is the first to tokenize US stock collateral for fixed-rate borrowing—bringing RWA stocks into a fixed-rate track, and the differentiation is clearly noticeable. There’s also an Alpha product with no liquidation leverage: it offers option-like exposure to Binance Alpha assets, where losses are limited to the premium paid—no need to worry about liquidation.

The financing background is also strong. In the early stage, it raised over $8 million, with Cumberland DRW leading the round and HashKey Capital and other institutions participating. By mid-August this year, it had deployed 10 EVM chains, registered over 1.5 million wallets, and hit a TVL peak above $90 million. In March of this year, its daily active users ranked once as the second highest across the whole market, only behind Aave.

The TMX token total supply is 1 billion, with a constant supply and no additional minting. It launched first on Arbitrum and BNB Chain. The official TGE time is August 25, 2026, and it hasn’t happened yet. What’s trading in the market right now are over-the-counter pre-mining rights.

The community is currently most concerned about how XP, AP, and MP will be distributed—details on vesting, lockups, and staking still need to be announced before the official TGE.

I’m paying attention to it, honestly not just chasing short-term returns. With locked-in yield for FT, GT wrapping leveraged positions, Range Order AMM matching supply and demand, and even a Physical Delivery mechanism under extreme conditions—these designs give more room to low-liquidity assets and even portions of RWA. Of course, leverage still carries liquidation and market volatility risks; fixed-rate doesn’t mean zero risk.

August 25’s TGE is a key milestone. Whether it can truly connect community heat, usage, and ecosystem growth afterward is what I’ll keep watching. #TermMax

#alpha Aug 17, Alpha airdrop pre-announcement! 10.5W spots!

📅 Today’s Airdrop

Today is August 17, and there’s basically no movement on the airdrop front. Earlier, I saw something deployed on-chain called DGAI, but it likely failed. Other projects haven’t issued any announcements either. Such is life—how can things always go perfectly?

Yesterday, the total trading volume for limit orders was 1,418,216,453, down 2.73% from the day before yesterday.

Alpha Trading Competition data:

GRVT: Yesterday was over 400k; today it jumped to just over 500k—up by more than 90k in a single day;

DOS: From over 100k to over 170k—up by more than 70k;

QUID: Steady as an old dog—3.3k to 3.6k, up by about 3k.

Today’s trading recommendations: (token points ×4 for tokens launching within 30 days)

For limit orders on GRVT: you’ve got 12 days left—small multiple orders in the 200–500U range.

The first time I noticed @Dusk was because of a rather counterintuitive premise: it starts by claiming to be an L1 privacy chain, but the goal isn’t to anonymously pump-and-dump—it’s to move regulated assets onto the chain. Back then, I thought either this team genuinely wants to solve problems, or they’re just too naive.

After following them for half a year, I found it was the former. In these years, there have been far too many projects switching tracks and rewriting narratives in the industry. This one, however, has stayed steady and kept chewing on the hard bones of compliance, privacy, and engineering implementation.

Yes, the pace is slow—I’ve complained about that too. But gradually I realized that at the infrastructure layer, the teams willing to keep grinding through regulatory details and cryptographic implementation even during quiet years clearly aren’t optimizing for short-term hype. Projects like this can be counted on one’s fingers.

The weaknesses are also obvious: the ecosystem is thin, the number of usable applications is limited, and product iteration often can’t keep up with community expectations. I acknowledge all of that, and I’m not trying to dress it up. But if the direction is right and execution is slower, at least there’s room for course correction. When real assets go on-chain, compliance and privacy are unavoidable—I still haven’t found a counterexample to that judgment.

Recently I revisited its architecture diagram. What attracted me isn’t the label “privacy chain” anymore—it’s that it genuinely separates settlement, execution, and identity. DuskDS handles consensus and finality, while also supporting both a public ledger and privacy transactions; DuskEVM runs smart contracts; Citadel manages identity and selective disclosure. That way, institutions no longer have to choose between privacy and regulatory transparency.

The Succinct Attestation mechanism is also convincing: Proposal, Validation, and Ratification step by step, ultimately producing deterministic finality. In securities trading, what they fear most isn’t slowness—it’s completing a trade and then having to worry about possible rollbacks.

Compared with the generic RWA talk, I think NPEX is the more worthwhile line to watch. Its collaboration with a licensed MTF in the Netherlands is very clear in intent: step by step, move the issuance, trading, and settlement of regulated securities onto the chain, with Quantoz’s EURQ filling the payment layer. Compliance is built into the underlying architecture; its core positioning is to explicitly serve the European institutional market.

The only thing I’m still cautious about is that privacy is enabled by default. The trigger conditions and who actually holds control for selective disclosure aren’t clear enough in the documentation. The signal I’m watching for is simple: when they will publish a fully open and complete explanation. $DUSK #dusk

Let's chat together

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk When I first started looking at @Dusk , I also got confused. A privacy chain—so my first reaction was Monero and Zcash. But once I really dug into it for a while, I realized this is completely different.

The logic behind Monero and Zcash is to prevent anyone from seeing anything. Dusk’s privacy, however, is to keep transaction details confidential to the outside world, while regulators can still verify that the operation is compliant without seeing the specific contents. One is hiding the cards entirely; the other is holding the cards but showing the compliance “proof.”

Technically, it splits into two layers. The bottom layer runs Phoenix, based on UTXO, with zero-knowledge proofs built directly into the transaction layer—sufficient for normal transfer privacy. But financial institutions need to manage dividends, voting rights, and holding limits; these UTXOs can’t handle that, so Zedger is added on top, specifically for security tokens. If holdings exceed the limit, the on-chain rules simply reject it. The world’s first securities settlement model that requires no trusted third party and simultaneously satisfies MiFID II. The two-layer division looks clunky, but if you think carefully—when you need both privacy and compliance, it might indeed be the only solution. Its “enemy” isn’t Ethereum, nor Solana, but the intermediary institutions that rake in billions every year through clearing and custody.

Binance bStocks brings US stocks on-chain, with 24/7 trading and near-instant settlement—certainly impressive. But everything on-chain is fully transparent: institutional positions are out in the open. No chance. $DUSK emphasizes auditable privacy: confidentiality externally, disclosure when regulators need it. This isn’t the savage privacy of a mixer; it’s a ZK approach with compliance baked in.

Now DuskEVM is coming online—taking over Ethereum’s tooling with migration costs close to zero. The partnership with the licensed Dutch exchange NPEX has also already been set in motion. So it’s not aiming to topple Ethereum; it’s aiming to take down the clearing houses that collect billions in fees every year. For institutional big money wanting to go on-chain, what’s missing is just this puzzle piece. Mainnet data hasn’t run yet, but for this track, I bet it’s right. #dusk

Yesterday, I read the @Dusk whitepaper—at first I really thought it was just a public chain with an added privacy layer. It wasn’t until I dug through the XSC (confidential securities contract) standard that I realized it’s not merely tacking on a privacy layer. Instead, it embeds compliance controls and zero-knowledge proofs directly into the token architecture.

Why does this matter? Because when institutions handle dividends or settlements, XSC can automatically verify eligibility and execute transfers via ZK circuits without exposing addresses or amounts. The receiving party can use cryptographic proofs to show I’m entitled to the money—there’s no need for the chain to check whitelists at all. It’s essentially replacing the traditional clearing intermediary with math.

So I went back through the fundamental logic behind $DUSK as well. Everyone’s chasing TPS right now, but for RWA to eat into the traditional finance pie, what’s missing was never speed—it’s compliance infrastructure built specifically for securities. Dusk’s asset standard with its built-in compliance engine could potentially disrupt the clearing rules in Wall Street, and that’s the variable I’ll be closely watching next cycle.

But while I’m watching that, I also have two knots in my mind that I can’t get around.

First: who actually controls the audit keys? If a foundation or a small number of nodes calls the shots, then even if privacy is strong, it’s still effectively centralized.

Second: when assets switch between the Moonlight and Phoenix models, will association information leak? The whitepaper provides a framework, but the security analysis isn’t detailed enough.

What’s even more troublesome is that institutions don’t just want technology—they want regulatory certainty. Dusk offers on-demand privacy capabilities, but once something is disclosed, how regulators will classify it is something nobody dares to guarantee. If a particular jurisdiction requires full transparency, then Phoenix could become a compliance obstacle instead. It tries to take the middle route, trying to please both sides, and in the end it might end up pleasing neither perfectly. That’s why I’m still observing this area.

On the operational side, there’s also a definite piece of progress. I broke down the AEGIS fee repair into pieces; the core logic boils down to one rule: gas_limit × gas_price must equal the already-proven max_fee. Check the mempool once and the VM once. The mempool blocks invalid inputs; the VM recalculates again, upgrading the entry check into execution rules and closing off any bypass path. This fix is real. Next, I’ll see whether wallets can clearly separate and display the maximum fee, actual consumption, and refunds—that’s what retail users can truly benefit from. #dusk

#alpha 8月15日, Alpha Airdrop Preview! 108K people!

📅 Today's Airdrop
New coins aren't worth much anymore, sigh! It's tough!

Alpha trading competition data:

- GRVT: Contract competition has 4 days left, current price 0.305, 24-hour trading volume 1.66 million, total trading volume 983 million.

- DOS: Contract has 25 days left, trading competition has 5 days left, price 0.2825, trading volume 11.75 million, up 4.76%, FDV 282 million, total trading volume 198 million.

- POWER: Trading competition has 6 days left, price 0.0855, trading volume 610,000, down 5.59%, FDV 85.49 million, total trading volume 85.21 million.

- QUID: 19 days left, trading competition has 5 days left, price 0.0749, trading volume 17.94 million, down 1.7%, FDV 74.89 million, total trading volume 850,000.

Today's action recommendation:

Place a limit order on the exchange for GRVT (14 days left), 300-500U.

Honestly, I’m a bit desensitized to whatever people are shilling this round. I missed the boat when the AI Agent hype was going on, and during the RWA surge days I was just watching from the sidelines. After going back and forth a few times, I realized one thing: instead of letting the market lead you around, you might as well sit where the real road is being built.

That place for me is Dusk.

It’s been over half a year since the mainnet launched, and the hype has stayed lukewarm, but the technical foundation is genuinely solid. Dusk is a Layer-1 built specifically for regulated financial use cases. It went live on the mainnet on January 7 this year. While everyone else is chasing concepts, it tackles the hard bones of on-chain finance from start to finish: how assets are issued compliantly, how identities are verified, how privacy is balanced, and how settlement can be done with confidence.

Dusk’s core highlight is native confidential smart contracts: transaction data is encrypted end-to-end on-chain, yet the network can still validate normally. The underlying layer uses PLONK zero-knowledge proofs, which is much faster than older approaches. Privacy chains are always afraid of regulators picking at them. Dusk solves this with a Citadel identity layer: one-time KYC, and afterward it only returns “yes or no” results—leaving no unnecessary traces. There are already licensed European institutions testing it, and the compliance cost is said to be much lower than traditional routes.

On the architecture side, Dusk is split into three layers: the bottom layer handles consensus settlement, while the upper layer is Ethereum-compatible and also accounts for privacy. Public transactions and anonymous transactions can be switched on the fly. Zero-knowledge proofs are embedded directly into the protocol layer, making confidential contracts a default feature.

Looking horizontally, Aztec leans more toward DeFi privacy, and Secret relies on TEE hardware—each has its focus. Dusk takes the narrow path of privacy + compliance. After the mainnet launched, active addresses were up by about 19,000 quickly, and daily transaction volume is roughly $270,000. After the two-way bridge went live, activity increased noticeably, though the number of nodes still needs further observation.

I’ve seen too many projects rise and fall. For something that honestly builds the foundation and blends compliance and privacy together, when the real wave comes, it may be rediscovered. Of course, the prerequisite is that institutional funds truly are willing to put it on-chain. I’ve kept a small position myself—not betting on it exploding overnight, but betting on the long-term logic.

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

August 14, #alpha —Alpha airdrop announcement! Participants: 10.2W!
📅 Today’s airdrop
In the zero zone, but on-chain messages indicate a new coin KLL airdrop tonight at 21:00 (UTC+8). Guessing it’s around 242 points—do you have enough points?

KII, L1 chain, mainly focuses on cross-border payments and on-chain FX swapping, and also rides a bit on the RWA hype. The presale the past couple of days built some foundation—price is around 0.097U. Raised 26M, total supply 1.8B tokens; based on the presale, the FDV is about 175M.

Alpha trading competition stats:

GRVT: Price 0.327, 24h volume 6.55M, -0.06%. Total transaction volume has accumulated to 720M; with 5 days left, the reward of 160 GRVT is roughly worth 52U.

DOS: Price 0.2675. The price is down nearly 15%. Total transaction volume 13.3M, with 6 days left, reward 143 DOS is roughly 38U.

POWER: 0.0906, volume 2.11M, down 7.7%. Total transaction volume 62.7M, with 7 days left; 625 POWER is roughly 56U.

QUID: Price 0.0772, 24h volume 134M! But down 6.6%. With 6 days left, 370 QUID is about 28U.

Suggested actions today:

GRVT (15 days), BSB (1 day), multiple small entries of 300–500U each.

Hehe😊 A new creator event is here.
Remember “dusk” big guy from before? Don’t miss it!
Back to the project itself—lately I’ve been keeping an eye on @Dusk . From what I can tell, the overall concept really hits my taste.

This public chain has a very precise positioning: it’s built specifically for regulated financial markets, combining programmable privacy with a complete compliance framework. Privacy and transparency on demand—authorizing parties can selectively disclose information—plus deterministic settlement. The whole logic is clearly aimed at RWA and compliant securities. $DUSK is its native core token.

What I’m most looking forward to is the soon-to-launch DuskEVM mainnet. It’s an application layer in the Dusk tech stack that’s compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine. Institutions, partners, and developers can directly connect using familiar tools like Solidity and Hardhat. Under the hood, it’s backed by the Hedger privacy module—homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs—so on-chain business workflows can be kept confidential while still being auditable, with regulatory compatibility taken to the max. This step truly brings confidential finance and the EVM ecosystem together.

On the partnership side, things are also very solid. It’s deeply integrated with multiple EU-licensed institutions, including the NPE exchange under supervision by the Dutch AFM. NPE has the full suite of MTF, broker-dealer, and ECSP qualifications. The plan is to move all assets with a total scale of over €300 million onto Dusk to issue and trade them. Note: this isn’t just mapping offline assets onto the chain—it’s native on-chain issuance, with the entire asset lifecycle running on-chain. Licenses and compliance products are all set up, and Dusk provides the complete infrastructure.

This balanced approach to programmable privacy is genuinely practical: encrypt what needs encrypting, make what needs transparent transparent, and when regulators require it, authorized institutions can selectively retrieve it. DeFi, tokenized assets, and on-chain finance can all be further expanded on top of this foundation. #dusk

August 13th, #alpha 8 — Alpha Airdrop Announcement! 9.5W participants!
📅 Today's Airdrop

It's Thursday today, and currently there’s no airdrop announcement. This week there’s one more—will it be scheduled for today or tomorrow?

Alpha 24H Trading Competition Data:

1st place GRVT: Price 0.3314, up by about 5%, trading volume over 15M. Total competition volume: 388M. Remaining reward pool: 160 GRVT, roughly 53U. Contracts remaining: 16 days. Trading competition remaining: 6 days.

2nd place POWER: Up today +7.49%, trading volume around 1M. Total competition volume: 367M. 625 POWER rewards worth about 62U. Trading competition remaining: 13 hours.

3rd place DOS: Down 12%, trading volume 13.4M. Total competition volume: 4.5M. 143 DOS rewards worth about 45U.

4th place CAP: Total trading volume 578M, price 0.0561, down 3.85%. Reward: 50 USDC. Trading competition remaining: 13 hours.

5th place QUID: Trading volume over 37M, price down 9%. Total competition volume: 270K. 370 QUID rewards worth about 30U.

Today’s Trading Suggestions:

To rack up points, using limit orders is recommended for farming GRVT (16 days left) and BSB (1 day left). Do multiple small buys in the 300–500U range.

December 12th, #alpha 8 — Alpha Airdrop teaser! 9.7W participants!

📅 Today’s airdrop

No airdrop teaser yet—check later this afternoon in case of a surprise.

Alpha Trading Tournament status:

GRVT: Current price 0.3159, 24-hour trading volume 7.39M, down 4.68%. Today’s limit orders executed 2.51M, yesterday 240M. Total volume 131M, with 160 GRVT left in the prize pool—about 50U. For the contract pool, there are 17 days remaining.

PRL: Price 0.3337, up 9.95%, 24H volume 1.24M. Today’s limit orders executed 800K, yesterday 290M. Total volume 149M, prize pool 295 PRL—about 98U, with 11 hours left.

CAP: Price 0.0566, up 25.81%, 24H volume 14.87M. Today’s limit orders executed 330K, yesterday 49.44M. Total volume 555M, prize pool 50 USDC—about 50U, with 2 days left.

POWER: Price 0.0921, slightly down 0.12%, 24H volume 720K. Today’s limit orders executed 40K, yesterday 94.48M. Total volume 97M, prize pool 625 POWER—about 57U, with 2 days left.

QUID: Price 0.0892, down 7.59%, 24H volume 10.04M. Today’s limit orders executed 9,000, yesterday 300K. Total volume 1.36M, prize pool 370 QUID—about 33U, with 13 hours left.

Today’s recommendations: For tokens launching within the next 30 days, use the token points multiplier ×4:

Prioritize pure trading volume for GRVT—17 days remaining; BSB has 2 days left. Recommended刷 (volume) around 300–500U.

August 11th, #ALPHA 8 Alpha Airdrop preview! 90K spots!

📅 Today’s airdrop

How much did everyone sell for yesterday’s DOS? Today orders are being posted at zero for now—let’s see whether there’ll be a surprise later this afternoon.

Binance Alpha 24-hour Trading Competition data:

1st place: GRVT — total trading volume 2.41B. Yesterday there were still 264 “small goals” in limit orders; today it’s 1.97M. Price 0.3334, up 9% in 24 hours. Trading volume 8.53M, FDV 330M.

2nd place: PRL — total trading volume 1.2B+. Yesterday there were 2.53M in limit orders; today at least 370K. Price hovering around 0.3, up 7.5%, volume 1.53M.

3rd place: CAP — 15.31M, up 10.7%, FDV 460M. Total trading volume 500M. Yesterday there were 88M in limit orders; today only 110K.

4th place: POWER — down 1.8% in 24 hours, volume only 510K, total trading volume just 2.51M. Yesterday there were 640K in limit orders; today it’s shrunk to 11K.

5th place: QUID — up 9.2%, volume 7.97M, but total trading volume is only 1.05M. Yesterday there were 160K in limit orders; today just 721.

Suggested actions for today:

Purely based on trading volume: QQQB hasn’t recovered to 4x yet—don’t rush. Use limit orders to “scrub”/farm GRVT (18 days left), and also BSB (only 3 days left). Do small batches around 300–500U.

August 10, #alpha Alpha Airdrop preview! Participants: 9.8W!
📅 Today’s airdrop

Finally, there’s an airdrop preview. Today’s main character is DOS. The project has raised $20 million, with Binance and Sequoia both investing. In simple terms, it’s basically the Web3 version of Codex/CNX’s “work-like” gameplay. Total supply: 1 billion coins; initial circulating supply is about 200 million (20%). This airdrop has a pretty big “board.”

The pre-market price is around 0.36 U, and the circulating market cap looks like only about 3.6 million U. Blind guess: score 240+.

Alpha 24H Trading Competition:

#1 GRVT — Price: 0.3054. Up 3.49% in 24H. Volume: 5.86M+. Total trading competition volume: 2.15B. Still 2 days left. This team’s trading competition reward is 400,000 GRVT: top 2,500 participants get 160 GRVT each. At the current price that’s roughly around 50 U.

#2 PRL — Price: 0.2839. Down 4.93% in 24H. Volume: ~1.30M. Cumulative: 950M. Still 3 days left. The PRL Phase 2 trading competition ends today at 7:00 PM. Top 2,000 participants get 590,000 PRL total: 295 PRL each, roughly 80+ U.

#3 CAP — Price: 0.0424. Straight up 15.61%! Volume: 6.14M. Cumulative: 417M. Still 4 days left. CAP’s Phase 2 trading competition ends on August 13. The prize pool is 100,000 USDC, with top 2,000 participants receiving 50 U each.

Suggested actions today:
Prioritize running 4x. Use GRVT and BSB limit orders. Do small batches of 300–500 U.

#alpha 8 August 8th, Alpha Airdrop Preview! Participants: 10.1W!

📅 Today’s Airdrop

As usual, most likely there will be no airdrops over the weekend.

Alpha 24-hour trading competition—latest standings:

1st place GRVT, current price 0.3139, up by nearly 10%, volume 4.5 million. Total trading volume is already 73.5 billion. Reward pool: 160 GRVT, roughly 50U. The contract has 21 days left; the trading competition has 4 days remaining.

2nd place CAP, 0.0371, up by more than 16 points, volume 6.6 million. Total trading volume: 141 million; 6 days left.

3rd place PRL, 0.2892, slight rise of about 2 points, volume 1.17 million. Total competition volume: 549 million. Rewards: 295 PRL, about 85U, with 5 days left.

4th place POWER, 0.0911, up by a bit over 4 points, volume only 480k; total trading volume just over 250k. 625 POWER exchanged for 57U; 6 days left.

5th place QUID, 0.0919, down by 5 points, total trading volume 670k. 370 QUID exchanged for 34U. Competition has 5 days left; the contract has 26 days remaining.

Today’s action recommendation:

For boosting points, BSB is recommended: 7 days, 300–500U.

August 7th — Alpha Airdrop Announcement! Participants: 101K!

📅 Today’s Airdrop

For now, there’s no new announcement. They say next week there will be a DOS token airdrop. The project has raised $20.3M, total token supply is 1 billion, pre-market estimated price is 0.36, and FDV is $360M. Nearby Boost has already allocated 0.3% of the share; for Alpha, it looks like they could get around 1%.

Initial circulating supply is 20%, and the token allocation is quite clear:
community airdrop 3%,
marketing 3%,
ecosystem growth 5%,
foundation treasury 9%.

Binance Alpha 24H Trading Competition Data

1st place: GRVT (contract), price 0.3, 24H trading volume 4.32M, up 8.56%, FDV only $300M. That day’s limit orders成交额 was $56.41M; the day before was even higher at over $19M. Total trading competition volume was over 500M! Reward: 160 GRVT ≈ 48U. The competition has 5 days left, contracts remaining: 22 days.

2nd place: PRL, price 0.2791, volume around 0.9M, up 3.5%, FDV $279M. Limit orders that day were $21.56M; day before $90.27M. Total volume: $244M. Reward: 295 PRL ≈ 82U, 6 days left.

3rd place: CAP, price 0.0311, volume 13.98M, down 5.18%, FDV $311M. Limit orders that day were only $1.64M, but the day before was $250M—quite a volatile swing. Total volume: $90.82M. Reward: 50 USDC, 7 days left.

4th place: NES, price 0.2036, volume 2.11M, slight up 0.74%. Total volume: $26.14M. Reward: 130 NES ≈ 26U, 8 hours left.

5th place: QUID, volume 63.53M, down 13.42%, price 0.09, FDV only $90M. Very few limit-order fills; total competition volume is around 0.57M. Reward: 370 QUID ≈ 33U, 6 days left.

6th place: POWER, volume 0.72M, down 3.99%; total competition volume is only about 60K. Reward: 625 POWER ≈ 52U.

Today’s recommendation (tokens listed within 30 days, points ×4):
Farm points: wallet QQQB, 4x coins, BSB (8 days left). #alpha

USD1×WLFI promotion is in full swing