Babylon TBV isn’t building a faster bridge—it’s building a more secure vault. As long as the safety record stays spotless and the return rate can outperform inflation expectations, the turning point for BTC DeFi could genuinely begin with it.
麒麟送财
·
--
Recently, people in the industry have been hotly discussing Bitcoin DeFi, and many talk about cross-chain efficiency all day long. But after carefully going through the TBV-related materials released with @BabylonLabs_io , I’m increasingly convinced that the reason BTC holders are still reluctant to participate in DeFi is never actually cross-chain technology—it’s trust.
In the past, whether it was wrapping BTC or using various cross-chain bridges, you inevitably end up with third-party custody and multisig mechanisms. For long-term coin holders, it’s like entrusting their core assets to someone else. That unease is hard to get rid of. TBV targets this exact pain point. The project uses a two-layer architecture: the bottom layer handles vault creation, redemptions, and security verification, safeguarding the foundation of BTC collateral; the top layer carries financial functions such as lending, liquidation, and rewards.
The testnet has already been integrated with Aave v4, and in the future it can extend into tracks like stablecoins and options. The two layers iterate independently—so even if risks occur in the top-layer applications, it’s difficult for them to affect the underlying BTC assets.
Of course, pros and cons coexist. Each vault is bound to its corresponding applications, and assets can’t be freely migrated across protocols, so liquidity may be affected. But this also prevents risks from propagating widely, which fits perfectly with the risk-averse mindset of major BTC holders.
What I care about most right now are a few signals: can the locked-in volume keep rising consistently? Are whales willing to take their coins out and earn yield without any need for bridging or custody? If these paths work out, what changes won’t just be the lending model—it will be the entire trust model for bringing BTC into DeFi. Either way, I’ll keep watching. A project that can uphold a security baseline and still give Bitcoin a new way forward is definitely worth关注. $BABY #baby
Recently, people in the industry have been hotly discussing Bitcoin DeFi, and many talk about cross-chain efficiency all day long. But after carefully going through the TBV-related materials released with @BabylonLabs_io , I’m increasingly convinced that the reason BTC holders are still reluctant to participate in DeFi is never actually cross-chain technology—it’s trust.
In the past, whether it was wrapping BTC or using various cross-chain bridges, you inevitably end up with third-party custody and multisig mechanisms. For long-term coin holders, it’s like entrusting their core assets to someone else. That unease is hard to get rid of. TBV targets this exact pain point. The project uses a two-layer architecture: the bottom layer handles vault creation, redemptions, and security verification, safeguarding the foundation of BTC collateral; the top layer carries financial functions such as lending, liquidation, and rewards.
The testnet has already been integrated with Aave v4, and in the future it can extend into tracks like stablecoins and options. The two layers iterate independently—so even if risks occur in the top-layer applications, it’s difficult for them to affect the underlying BTC assets.
Of course, pros and cons coexist. Each vault is bound to its corresponding applications, and assets can’t be freely migrated across protocols, so liquidity may be affected. But this also prevents risks from propagating widely, which fits perfectly with the risk-averse mindset of major BTC holders.
What I care about most right now are a few signals: can the locked-in volume keep rising consistently? Are whales willing to take their coins out and earn yield without any need for bridging or custody? If these paths work out, what changes won’t just be the lending model—it will be the entire trust model for bringing BTC into DeFi. Either way, I’ll keep watching. A project that can uphold a security baseline and still give Bitcoin a new way forward is definitely worth关注. $BABY #baby
#ALPHA 7, July 27th — Alpha Airdrop Preview! Participants: 8.6W!
📅 Today’s Airdrop
No airdrop preview yet, but on-chain information indicates that a new coin, AEON, will be listed at 18:00 today. Funding: 8 million; total token supply: 1 billion; initial circulating supply: 193.4 million, roughly 19.34%. Estimated opening price: around 0.06. FDV: 60 million. Guessing the score will be 250+.
Alpha 24H Trading Competition:
UP, price 0.3129, 24-hour trading volume 27 million, slight dip of 2.43%, FDV 312 million. Today’s limit order: a bit over 160k. Total trading volume has already broken 600 million. There are 5 days left; you’re currently in the lead. Reward: 160 UP, roughly 50.
QAIT, 0.00676, about 340k in trades, down 2.72%, FDV 67.59 million. Today’s limit order: over 60k; yesterday: 154 million; total trades: 424 million. 2 days left; reward: 8,330 QAIT, roughly 56.
BLUAI contract, 0.0122, about 60k in trades, slight dip of 0.78%, FDV 122 million. Today’s limit order: 46k; yesterday: 49 million; total trades: 411 million. 3 days left; reward: 2,990, roughly 36.
O contract, 0.4655, 400k in trades, big drop of 7.88%, FDV 465 million. Today’s limit order: 30k; yesterday: 57 million; total trades: 154 million. 4 days left; reward: 75 O, about 35.
ZEST contract, 0.2483, about 880k in trades, +0.83%, FDV 248 million. Today’s limit order: 1669; yesterday: 150k; total trades: 680k. 3 days left; reward: 200, roughly 49.
Today’s operating recommendations:
Q U U Q B (wallet) is the first choice for farming scores, with 1024U per transaction. Next: B S B (19 days), 200–500U per transaction.
To be honest, staying up late to take part in @BabylonLabs_io ’s event has nearly made my eyes go blurry. This time, it’s split into two tracks: for the regular top 300, the average reward is 50U; for the invited top 15, you go straight for 200U. If you ask me to choose, I’d definitely try to squeeze into the invited track—the gap in rewards is way too obvious.
But honestly, focusing only on the rewards doesn’t help. You’ve got to understand the project first. I studied it for a while and found that $BABY is targeting the longstanding “hard problem” of making Bitcoin work for long-term, sit-and-hold use cases. Right now BTC’s market cap is so high, yet over 99% of coins are just sleeping in wallets. Why? Because back when people wanted to use Bitcoin in DeFi, they either had to hand it over to centralized custodians, or route it through cross-chain bridges. Everyone knows how many security issues those two approaches have had.
Babylon came up with a new twist called Trustless Bitcoin Vaults (TBV). In plain terms, it’s a trustless Bitcoin safe. Your BTC stays on your own chain, locked inside a smart vault—only unlocked if certain conditions are met. The whole thing relies on cryptographic proofs and zero-knowledge verification. No middlemen earning spread, and no need to package it into derivatives like wBTC. The first time I saw this scheme, I almost thought it was just another gimmick for Bitcoin yield. But once you break down the contract logic and the verification flow, you realize it’s solving a deeper question: who actually controls the asset at the base level. Compared with other cross-chain approaches, TBV doesn’t take the old path of moving “your coins over there.” Instead, it locks BTC as independent UTXOs—everyone’s responsible for their own part, with no interference. External applications verify state through mathematical proofs, not through some project team’s “trust me.”
Of course, it’s not without shortcomings. Whether it can keep efficiency at scale, how complex integration with applications is, and whether security verification can stand up to the test of time—all of that is still a question mark. But at least it pushes the “how to bring Bitcoin into complex financial scenarios with low risk” problem toward a cleaner way of thinking.
Bitcoin has never lacked liquidity. What it’s missing is a style where the coin doesn’t move and the authority doesn’t get lost. I think step $BABY is worth taking a closer look. #baby
Last month, my buddy Lao Chen had two Bitcoins in his hand, worth about 120k U. He wanted to just hold them and earn interest. But after researching for a week, he worried that using WBTC on AAVE might run into trouble with cross-chain bridges, and exchange wealth-management yields were pitifully low. After fiddling with it for a week, he sighed: “Forget it—I’ll just keep them in a cold wallet. At least I can sleep at night.”
I couldn’t help but laugh—doesn’t that basically describe the collective dilemma of BTC holders? All the money just sits there gathering dust, and getting any passive income feels harder than climbing a ladder to heaven. But then I checked the yields of different assets, and it hurt even more. USDC annualized is 6.51%, USDT is 4.59%, and even SOL is 2.69%—while BTC is only 0.27%.
So where’s the problem? BTC can’t be staked directly to earn yield. If you want returns, you have to go through WBTC or a cross-chain bridge. But with custody risks and hackers hitting exchanges all the time, who would dare throw their BTC over there?
Until last year, Babylon came up with a new idea. It uses Bitcoin-native time locks and Taproot scripts, letting you lock BTC in your own mainnet treasury without bridging or wrapping. The assets never leave your custody. The logic is clear, right? Once the risk dropped, capital indeed bought in. TVL shot up to as high as 6 billion, and even now it’s still around 4 billion, accounting for about 80% of BTC DeFi.
Recently it also integrated with Aave V4, which is a sign of mainstream recognition.
But honestly, after reading its whitepaper for hours, I found an awkward truth: the interest rate has stayed below 1% for a long time. Honestly, that yield isn’t very compelling. More importantly, the $BABY token hardly participates in the business closed loop; the staking and security services people pay for are mostly BTC or other on-chain native assets. BABY mainly relies on governance and liquid/staked mixing to support things. It feels more like a one-off demand—so will there be strong enough long-term spot buying pressure? I genuinely have doubts.
The tech is definitely impressive, but the token price ultimately depends on real consumption. With BTC worth 1.3 trillion, even if you could capture just 3%, that’s nearly 40 billion in market impact. So if you’re buying BABY based on the “BTC ecosystem #1” narrative, ask yourself this: no matter how well the business runs, what is the actual relationship to the coins you hold—before you act. @BabylonLabs_io #baby
July 25, #ALPHA 7—Alpha Airdrop announcement! 6.9W participants!
📅 Today’s airdrop
No airdrops over the weekend—eat and drink as you please.
Alpha 24H Trading Contest Data:
UP: Total trading volume 766 million. There are still over 300 million in remaining limit orders from the previous day. Even though today is only 600k, the #1 spot is firmly secured. Current price is 0.32, up 0.31% over the past 24 hours; FDV is 320 million.
O: The contract contest has 6 days left. Total trading volume is 16.62 million. Today’s limit orders are 170k; yesterday’s were over 15 million. It dropped by two percentage points, with the price hovering around 0.5.
BLUAI: 5 days remaining. Total trades are 338 million. The previous day’s limit orders were 37.18 million; today it dropped to over 90k. Up 1.89%; price is 0.0122.
QAIT: 4 days remaining. Total is 134 million. The previous day’s volume was 10.16 million; today it’s only 16k. Down slightly by 0.94%; price is 0.00709.
BILL has ended. Total 584 million. Yesterday was 179 million; today is only a bit over 10k. Down 5.88%; price is 0.0289.
ZEST: 5 days remaining. Total is only 360k. Today is 773; yesterday was 150k. A tiny increase of 0.58%; price is 0.2464.
Trading suggestions for today:
Score farming—recommended: QQQB (inside your wallet). 1024U per transaction.
TBV (Trust Minimization Vault) indeed does not move BTC, but it requires BTC holders to proactively sign and broadcast transactions of a specific script. This means users need more advanced operational capability than simply transferring with a private key (e.g., handling PSBT, partially signing transactions).
麒麟送财
·
--
I recently chatted with a few friends who are into BTC, and found that people are pretty split in how they feel about the term “staking.” On one hand, they think it’s a great thing that BTC can finally earn yield. On the other hand, they feel like you have to “cross the bridge” and wrap it—after all that hassle, isn’t it basically handing your coins over to someone else? I listened to both sides argue, and then re-thought the @BabylonLabs_io plan again from scratch.
Trustless Bitcoin Vaults is essentially answering a stubborn question: can BTC stay where it is, but also prove that it’s being used properly? Most solutions on the market follow the same logic: move the BTC first, then do the rest. Whether it’s a bridge or wBTC, there’s always a custodian or a multisig committee standing in the background. Users may earn a bit more yield, but deep down they still worry—what if things go wrong over there?
TBV takes a different approach. It doesn’t move BTC. Instead, it uses Bitcoin scripts and Taproot outputs to build Vaults directly on-chain. Each Vault corresponds to its own independent UTXO, and it doesn’t get mixed with anyone else’s. Who can move the coins in here? Not what some administrator decides—it’s governed by preset rules plus script verification. External applications can confirm the state by looking at verifiable evidence, not by anyone’s promise.
The technical logic sounds pretty solid, but in my own mind the scale hasn’t fully tipped yet. BTC holders are generally conservative. Even if the $BABY rewards are tempting, you still need to account for the numbers: how the price might move, what unlock schedule looks like, and whether liquidity is sufficient. Those things are not as “low-stress” as the surface annualized return suggests.
So right now I’m认可 the direction, but I’ll move more slowly when it comes to actually doing it. Only when this model can truly make money from selling security services—not from token issuance subsidies—will it be worth going heavy. #baby
I recently chatted with a few friends who are into BTC, and found that people are pretty split in how they feel about the term “staking.” On one hand, they think it’s a great thing that BTC can finally earn yield. On the other hand, they feel like you have to “cross the bridge” and wrap it—after all that hassle, isn’t it basically handing your coins over to someone else? I listened to both sides argue, and then re-thought the @BabylonLabs_io plan again from scratch.
Trustless Bitcoin Vaults is essentially answering a stubborn question: can BTC stay where it is, but also prove that it’s being used properly? Most solutions on the market follow the same logic: move the BTC first, then do the rest. Whether it’s a bridge or wBTC, there’s always a custodian or a multisig committee standing in the background. Users may earn a bit more yield, but deep down they still worry—what if things go wrong over there?
TBV takes a different approach. It doesn’t move BTC. Instead, it uses Bitcoin scripts and Taproot outputs to build Vaults directly on-chain. Each Vault corresponds to its own independent UTXO, and it doesn’t get mixed with anyone else’s. Who can move the coins in here? Not what some administrator decides—it’s governed by preset rules plus script verification. External applications can confirm the state by looking at verifiable evidence, not by anyone’s promise.
The technical logic sounds pretty solid, but in my own mind the scale hasn’t fully tipped yet. BTC holders are generally conservative. Even if the $BABY rewards are tempting, you still need to account for the numbers: how the price might move, what unlock schedule looks like, and whether liquidity is sufficient. Those things are not as “low-stress” as the surface annualized return suggests.
So right now I’m认可 the direction, but I’ll move more slowly when it comes to actually doing it. Only when this model can truly make money from selling security services—not from token issuance subsidies—will it be worth going heavy. #baby
July 24th, #alpha 7 — Alpha Airdrop preview! 8.4W participants!
📅 Today’s Airdrop
Still waiting for the next one. This week’s 2 airdrops have already been distributed, so take a break today!
Binance Alpha 24H Trading Competition:
BILL, 0.0311. In the past 24 hours, over 2 million worth of trades; it surged up by 21%. FDV: 310 million. Today’s limit orders completed 1.37 million; yesterday it was over 130 million. Total competition volume is about to reach 150 million, with 6 days left.
UP, 0.3195. In the past 24 hours, 74.81 million in trading volume; up 1.25%. FDV: 319 million. Total competition volume is already 640 million+, note: only 12 hours left before it ends.
BLUAI, 0.0121. Down 3 points; volume around 170K; FDV: 120 million. Total volume is over 300 million, with 6 days left.
QAIT, 0.00716. Up 0.79%; volume 1.8 million; FDV: over 70 million. Total volume 124 million, with 5 days left.
ZEST, 0.2453. Up 8.4%; volume 1.08 million; FDV: 245 million. But total competition volume is only about 210K, with 6 days left.
Today’s trading suggestions:
If you want to rush the competition score, I recommend QQQB—do 1024U per order. 4x coin. I haven’t seen any clear opportunities yet, so keep watching.
Brothers! Binance Square has rolled out a small upgrade to a creator event this time—straight to an invite-only format. The first pilot project is #BABY .
This time, the gameplay is more practical. The top 15 share 239,000,000 $BABY tokens, and the rest split 1,751,000,000 tokens together. Basically everyone gets a piece. Unlike before, where only the first 300 people had rewards.
Let me talk a bit about project @BabylonLabs_io . The Bitcoin ecosystem has long lacked solid DeFi, because gas fees are expensive and native mechanisms have many limitations. If you want to run ETH safely, go to Solana or BSC quickly—BTC DeFi has basically been a pseudo-argument. But Babylon delivered with a mechanism called TBV (Trustless Bitcoin Vault). At its peak, TVL climbed to $7.2 billion, and in theory, relying only on a 10% fee, it could make $30 million per year. The core logic in one line: don’t trust me—trust the code and the Bitcoin network.
Of course, the industry ceiling is there. Only about 0.8% of the whole network’s BTC participates in DeFi. $BABY has fallen from last year’s peak of 0.18 to the current 0.012—that’s a significant drop, but it also shows the whole track is still in its early stage.
Personally, I’m quite optimistic. With Bitcoin being this strong, it’s worth exploring more ways to build on it. In the future, more and more people will want to hold long-term without just lying flat—TBV-type infrastructure fits the demand perfectly.
Whether you’re just taking advantage or seriously putting effort into content, this event is worth trying. Bitcoin’s story is still ongoing, and $BABY might be a window into BTC DeFi becoming real.
#alpha 7 July 23rd, Alpha airdrop announcement! 7.4W people!
📅 Today’s airdrop
Still stuck at zero—wait and see if there’ll be a surprise later?
Binance Alpha 24H Trading Competition:
1st place: BLUAI, price 0.0125. Trades in the last 24 hours hit 240K+, up 6.82%. Total trading volume: 134M. With the contracts + trading competition, there are 7 days left.
2nd place: BILL, price 0.0254. Down slightly 1.15% today. 24H volume: 860K. Total volume: 12.43M. 7 days left.
3rd place: UP, 24H trading volume over 16M, total volume 571M, leading by a wide margin. However, the price has retraced by 2.42%.
4th place: QAIT, price 0.00714. 24H volume: 1.7M. Total volume: 5.91M. Down sharply today by -18.68%. 6 days left in the competition.
5th place: ZEST, price 0.2282, up slightly 3.41%. Total volume: 76.5K.
Recommended points-grinding today:
Recommend QQQB for points-grinding, 1025U per order. NES has 1 day left—small amounts of 200–500U.
Yesterday, old coins launched a surprise attack—it's hard to put into words! In the anti-rug July, why are there still so many people?
Binance Alpha 24H Trading Competition:
- 1st place UB: 0.1020, 24-hour trading volume 11.30M, up 4.73%, FDV hit 1.02B. Total trading volume: 339M. With 13 hours left, can this break 150M?
- 2nd place UP: Volume 57.92M, a small pullback of 2.67% to 0.3230, but total trading volume is already 516M.
- 3rd place BILL: Up 8.88%, price 0.0259, total trading volume 229M.
- 4th place BLUAI: Pulled back 8.79%, but total trading volume is 257M.
- 5th place O: 0.6086, total trading volume 1.07B.
Suggested volume boosting today:
Recommend QQQB, around 1025U per single transaction; AKE also—1 day left, small amounts of 200–500U.
📊 Crypto Market:
Fear & Greed Index is 39—still in the Fear zone. BTC 66500, ETH 1900, BNB 570… Is BNB determined to be a stablecoin? The volatility isn’t even as big as my heartbeat.
July 21st, Alpha airdrop preview! 9.6W people! 📅 Today’s airdrop No airdrop preview yet—there have been no new-coin airdrops for 25 days. People in the circle are saying Alpha is probably done for 😂.
Binance Alpha 24H Trading Competition:
O — 0.6187, trading volume 698k, up 5.41%. FDV is directly 618 million.
UB — 0.0973, trading volume 7.49M, surged 9.77%.
BILL — 0.0237, trading volume 858k, pulled back 3.45%.
UP — 0.3314, trading volume 45.17M, up 2.51%.
BLUAI — 0.0128, trading volume 564k, up 7.52%.
Today’s trading suggestions: First recommendation: QB for boosting volume—about 1025U per order is the most stable. Second: ARX, 200–500U.
Crypto market outlook: As for the overall market, the Fear & Greed Index is 37—still hovering in the Fear zone. BTC 64510, ETH 1900, BNB 570. At this point, if BTC and ETH are brave enough to lead the charge, things can keep moving. If it keeps ranging sideways, then hold back—don’t randomly rush in. #ALPHA
July 20th, Alpha Airdrop Announcement! 9.9W participants! 📅 Today’s Airdrop There’s currently no airdrop preview—check back later to see if there’ll be a surprise.
Binance Alpha 24H Trading Competition:
1st place: O, price 0.5875, 24-hour volume 267,000, price change 0.36%. However, FDV is 587M (i.e., 5.87B), and total trading volume is 847M!
2nd place: BILL, price 0.0245, 24H volume 4.55M. It’s down 5.37%, but the total competition volume is 145M—still not completely falling apart.
3rd place: UB, price 0.0888, volume 3.58M. Down 3.9%, with total competition volume 182M. It’s holding on tightly and still struggling.
4th place: UP, price 0.3231, 24H volume 77.19M. Down 0.24%, total trading volume 343M.
5th place: BLUAI, 0.0119, volume 278,000. Up 1.29%, total competition volume 160M—steady and reliable.
Trading advice for today:
Top pick for farming points: QQQB, 200–500u per trade. Next: ARX (2 days remaining).
Today’s Crypto Fear & Greed Index is 35—still in the Fear zone. BTC is hovering around 64,600; ETH at 1,800; BNB at 570. In my opinion, this is a good time to DCA. #ALPHA
#alpha 7 18th of July, Alpha Airdrop preview! 9.1W participants! 📅 Today’s airdrop No airdrop over the weekend, brothers—eat and drink as usual.
Yesterday, the total trading volume on the limit-price orders was 1.551 billion, down another 10 percentage points from yesterday.
Binance Alpha 24-hour Trading Competition
O (contract) Current price 0.5756, 24-hour volume 680k, up 1.56%; total competition volume 658 million—4 days left.
BILL price 0.0227, down 7.4%; 24-hour volume 4.58 million, total volume reaching 70.10 million. Convert it—176 million BILL are being traded back and forth. This volatility—brothers doing short-term trades are loving it.
UB price 0.0910, 24-hour volume 8.77 million, surged 11.47%; total volume 128 million—5 days left.
BLUAI price 0.0118, up 6.26%; 24-hour volume 577k; total volume 140 million.
UP price 0.3183, 24-hour volume 2.54 million, slight increase 0.63%; total volume only 182k—7 days left.
Today’s recommendation (new coins listed within 30 days, points ×4): For fast point farming, ARX is recommended—it has 4 days left. Don’t get carried away with your trades. Use 200–500 per order, multiple small orders, and farm points slowly.
##alpha 7 July 17th, Alpha Airdrop Announcement! 11.4W participants!
📅 Today’s Airdrop No airdrop notice yet—July is just too tough.
Yesterday’s limit-price orders: total trading volume was 172 million, which shrank by more than 11 compared to the day before.
Binance Alpha 24H Trading Competition:
1st place: O — 0.5666. In 24 hours, it did 1.28 million, up 2.63%. FDV: 566 million. The competition zone’s total trading volume reached 53.5 million. Today was rock-solid. Derivatives players basically sent him straight to first place. About 90 O is roughly 50.99—purely a trading-type participant.
2nd place: RTX — 1.03. 24h volume: 15.02 million, down slightly 0.69%. Total trading volume: 18.93 million. About 30 RTX is roughly 30.66. The key point: the trading fees can still be reduced by 17%! If you’re quick, grab it now—don’t miss out on free money.
3rd place: BILL — 0.0246. 24h volume: 8.31 million, but the price dropped by more than 19. Total trading volume is already 7.59 billion. About 1760 BILL is roughly 43.25.
4th place: BLUAI — 0.0110. 24h: 8.98 million, crashed 36%… Total trading volume: 132 million. About 2990 BLUAI is roughly 32.93.
5th place: UB — 0.0814. Up 0.29%. 24h: 7.22 million, total volume: 60.73 million. About 510 UB is roughly 41.49.
6th place: NEX — 0.00000177. 24h: 0.37 million, total: 246 million. About 20408 NEX is roughly 36.06.
Today’s Recommendation (tokens launching within 30 days, points ×4): Purely based on trading volume, recommend ARX. There are 5 days left. Suggested order size: 200–500 per trade; do a few small trades more frequently.
#ALPHA 7月16, Alpha airdrop preview! 119K people! 📅 Today's airdrop Still at zero; there has been no new coin airdrop for 20 days. Accumulate points and wait for next week's TGE. Yesterday's total limit order trading volume across the platform was 194.5 million, up another 2.43% from the day before. Alpha 24H trading competition: Top-ranked O had a 24-hour trading volume of 495K, and the division's total trading volume has already surged to 260 million! Although the price dipped slightly by 0.67%, this trading volume is insane. FDV 560 million, firmly in first place, with 6 days left in the trading competition. Second-place BLUAI is also not backing down. Price 0.0171, 24H volume 177K, up 1.03%, and total trading volume has already reached 6.79 million. Third place's strongest performer today is UB! It surged 15.16%, bringing the price to 0.0815, with 24H trading volume breaking 12 million and total trading volume at 47 million. Fourth, BILL fell 20.53% today, but total trading volume still reached 690 million. Fifth, RTX price 1.03, volume 639K, total trading volume 3.85 million. Sixth, NEX volume 939K, total trading volume 246 million. Today's recommendation (tokens listed within 30 days, points ×4): Pure volume recommendation: ARX (6 days left), trade 200-500 per order, small amounts multiple times.
#alpha 7July 15, Alpha airdrop preview! Audience: 117K! 📅 Today's airdrop Yesterday's high-score raid on two old coins ended up at zero, this month is really tough. Yesterday's total trading volume for limit orders was 1.899 billion, a sharp jump from the day before. Binance Alpha 24H trading competition: Top spot: NES, 24H trading volume 49.82 million, total market cap 1.52 billion! Second: O took off today, +9.92%! 24H volume 650K, total is about to break 100 million. Third: BILL, -34% crash, but trading volume still exceeded 10 million, total 63.8 million. UB, RTX, and NEX are neck and neck behind them. Especially NEX, price 0.00000179, with the decimals taking forever to count, total is already 24.5 million. Today's recommendation (tokens listed within 30 days, points ×4) Pure trading volume recommendation: ARX (7 days left). Trade around 200-500 per order, use small amounts and many orders to slowly farm.
July 14, #alpha — Alpha Airdrop Preview! 11.4W people! 📅 Today’s Airdrop No airdrop preview yet—looks like we’re about to get rugged 😭 Yesterday’s total limit-order trading volume was $167.8M, down 3.18% from the day before. Binance Alpha 24H Trading Contest: 1st: NES, current price 0.2494, 24h volume $49.18M, up 2.04%, FDV $249M. Total volume $1.28B; 10 days + 2 days remaining in the schedule. 2nd: O, price 0.5160, 24h volume $1.68M, down 6.28%, total volume holding steady at $812M. 3rd: BILL, 0.0598, 24h volume $6.62M, aggressively pumped up 15.23%, total volume $363M. 4th SLX total $283M 5th NEX total $245M 6th UB total $364M 7th RTX total $293M Today’s Recommendation (tokens to be listed within 30 days; points ×4): Pure trading-volume pick: ARX (8 days left). Do trades of 200–500U per order, multiple small buys to churn/refresh.