茶侯归人

Rumors say Dongchedi issued a rectification notice, and a suspected former employee has spoken out. Could the Zunjie pedal controversy take a turn?
Everyone initially thought the Zunjie pedal controversy would be settled after Zunjie’s official statement. But after a day of buildup, a sudden twist emerged just before the end of the workday.
First, a notice reportedly circulated online about an internal rectification at Dongchedi. It said the company had recently engaged in unfair competition in the market and was under investigation by the relevant regulators, so it would conduct an internal compliance review and rectification.
But that wasn’t all. Soon after the notice appeared, a post by a user on an overseas platform began circulating in auto-industry circles. The user claimed to be a former Dongchedi employee and commented on the Zunjie incident. The post contained some significant claims and may be connected to Dongchedi’s self-review notice.
The gist of the post was that Zunjie’s response had been highly professional and decisive, and that the pedal met the standards, so there was no need for a recall. The poster also said that automakers had questioned Dongchedi’s testing practices multiple times. Tests by Chinese auto media, modeled on overseas outlets, tend to focus more on user experience and entertainment, and lag considerably in professionalism. In that context, it was inappropriate for Dongchedi to overstate its own professionalism.
Finally, the poster commented on Dongmen, the former colleague who handled this report for Dongchedi, saying his name was strange and his character poor. The poster said it was entirely right for Xinhua News Agency and Dongchedi to remove his content about exposing the issue.
#懂车帝 #尊界

Copy trading? A tool for lining pockets: 100% losses in one month and 80% losses in five days. Your copy trading is becoming a money-making scheme!
Where are the regulators?

Blast, once holding over $2 billion in locked assets, announces L2 shutdown: Users must withdraw assets by October 26
On October 2, Ethereum Layer 2 network Blast announced that it would shut down, citing operating costs that had exceeded the revenue generated by the network. This L2 project, which once had over $2 billion in assets locked, offers the industry a real-world case study in "project sustainability."
According to the announcement, users must withdraw their assets through the standard interface by October 26. After that date, they will need to interact directly with the bridge contract on Ethereum mainnet to retrieve their assets, significantly raising the bar for doing so. For users holding related assets, this is a clear deadline for taking action.
The lessons behind this event are worth considering: Competition in the L2 sector depends heavily on ecosystem growth and revenue generation; a high TVL does not necessarily mean a sustainable business model. The security of on-chain assets ultimately depends on protocol governance and operational decisions, so users need to keep up with project developments rather than focus only on early data. When a shutdown or migration announcement is made, users are advised to verify the information through official channels as soon as possible and handle their assets promptly according to the announcement to avoid missing the window.
This is not investment advice.
#以太 #Layer2 #Blast t #风险提示

From Blockchain to a “Cryptographic World Computer”: What’s Next for Ethereum
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently published an article titled “The Cryptographic World Computer,” proposing that Ethereum is evolving from a traditional blockchain into a “cryptographic world computer.” He expects that around 2030, Ethereum will adopt mechanisms such as few-slot finality to further shorten confirmation times and improve network efficiency. The industry views this statement as an important signal of Ethereum’s long-term technical direction.
Meanwhile, Ethereum’s next major upgrade, “Fusaka,” announced by the Ethereum Foundation, is underway. Its main goal is to improve the scalability of Layer 2 (L2) networks and significantly enhance the user experience on both L1 and L2. In addition, the Ethereum Foundation is testing censorship-resistant and block-building mechanisms such as ePBS and block-level access lists. Some proposals are expected to be implemented in subsequent upgrades in 2027.
For everyday users, upgrades often mean higher network throughput and potential changes to transaction costs, but they also bring short-term uncertainty during technical transitions. Following the official roadmap and progress on developer networks is more reliable than chasing scattered updates.
This is not investment advice.
#以太坊 #加密世界

ESMA’s new rules: Crypto platforms must phase out non-compliant stablecoins within 3 months; USDT first in line
On October 8, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued an opinion requiring crypto-asset service providers authorized under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) to end services involving stablecoins that do not meet MiCA requirements within no more than three months. The requirement covers the entire range of services, including trading, custody, transfers, and investment advice. Although the opinion did not name specific tokens, USDT, the largest stablecoin by market capitalization, is widely seen as the main asset affected because its issuer, Tether, has not applied for MiCA authorization.
According to foreign media reports, Tether previously declined to seek MiCA authorization, primarily because MiCA requires issuers of significant stablecoins to hold at least 60% of their reserve assets with commercial banks, which conflicts with its existing reserve management arrangements. ESMA also said regulators may allow users to temporarily withdraw or convert non-compliant stablecoins to safeguard their assets.
This development is another reminder that stablecoins are not an "unregulated zone": differences in regional regulation may create liquidity shocks and compliance risks. It is also important to remember that Chinese regulatory authorities have made clear that business activities related to virtual currencies constitute illegal financial activities. Users in mainland China should fully understand the associated risks. We recommend keeping an eye on regulatory changes in your region and planning in advance how to respond.
This does not constitute investment advice.
#USDT #监管 #币安热门推荐

"Bitcoin fluctuates around $83,000, with ETF seeing nearly $490 million in net outflows in a single day. What is the market trading?"
Over the past 24 hours, Bitcoin has been consolidating in the $82,000 to $84,000 range, with mainstream market data showing BTC down about 1.6% to 2.8% from the previous day. Meanwhile, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded their largest single-day net outflow since June 25, totaling about $485 million. Of that, BlackRock's IBIT saw outflows of about $208 million and Fidelity's FBTC saw outflows of about $105 million, pushing ETF net inflows for October from positive to negative.
The pullback is driven by both macro and capital-flow factors: continued rises in U.S. Treasury yields are weighing on risk assets, including crypto; after Bitcoin retreated from recent highs, profit-taking has also accelerated. Still, looking at the bigger picture, BlackRock's IBIT alone saw $2.65 billion in net inflows in September, showing that institutional capital has not truly left the market. The market is more characterized by "greater volatility at high levels and clearer divergence between bulls and bears."
For ordinary investors, a single day's ETF flow is only one of many indicators. Short-term price moves are heavily influenced by macro sentiment, so do not chase gains or panic-sell based solely on one day's data.
Not investment advice.
#BTC #ETF #币安

【Copy Trading: Don’t Let “Easy Money” Turn Into “Liquidation”】
A trader repeatedly recommended by some big names on the demo copy-trading platform lost 100% of their funds, wiping out their entire principal.
Many people think copy trading = copying expert trades = guaranteed profits. In reality, that couldn’t be more wrong. Here are a few harsh truths: ① Copy trading ≠ guaranteed profits. Even experts use stop-losses, and if you’re a moment late, you’re already behind; ② With leverage, a market move in the opposite direction can liquidate your account in an instant; ③ You’re following the “past,” but the market keeps changing—and experts change their strategies too.
Remember: copying trades with your entire balance is gambling with your life. Setting stop-losses and managing your position size are the only ways to stay in the game. Don’t hand over all your decision-making to someone else, and never borrow money to copy trades. Learn about risk before chasing returns. Protecting your principal must always come first.
Risk management should always be the top priority when making money.
#跟单交易 #比特币跌破8.1万美元

Is something big coming?

Well done—the road ahead for civil engineers is here.

Where are you, Bao Dong?

The baby is sad but the baby doesn't say anything

0.38 opened and 0.35 stop loss was pulled

Bao is amazing

Niu Niu Treasure

I came up late today and didn't see it.

The new currency is hesitant to participate

Top

Bao Dong must like posts

Bao Zong, pull it.

Let's create a group, Baoding.