On Monday’s open, my eyes almost couldn’t keep up: BTC suddenly surged nearly 8%, topping out at $87,381. The total crypto market cap has, for the first time since January, reclaimed the $3 trillion mark.
But if you look a bit deeper into the order flow, it’s hard not to frown. Coinglass data tells the story: open interest in perpetual contracts is approaching $160 billion, a new 11-month high; on Monday alone, long/short liquidations saw $920 million in short positions wiped out. In normal circumstances, a squeeze like this should quickly flush out leverage. Instead, what happened was: shorts were pushed out, longs immediately stepped in to take over—leverage didn’t really go away.
As QCP trader Caleb Lin put it: leverage running ahead of spot is the most dangerous setup. And since the spot order book isn’t very deep, a 5% move in this structure can happen far faster than you’d expect—upward is chase-and-pass for momentum traders, while downward is a chain reaction of long liquidations.
One reassuring point: the U.S. spot BTC ETFs flipped to net inflows over the weekend. On Thursday and Friday combined, they attracted $593 million—big money didn’t miss this time. HYPE and Zcash also moved up with BTC; market sentiment feels real.
My view is simple: a squeeze can manufacture price, but it can’t create long-term holders. Next week, I’ll only watch one thing—whether spot demand can pick up the baton passed by leverage. If it can’t, this bill will be paid sooner or later.
What will you do these days: reduce exposure and wait, or keep chasing?
Today there’s a major event: the quarterly options settlement for BTC and ETH—right on today.
Just saw a report from CoinDesk: today at 8:00 (UTC) settlement, with about $15.9 billion worth of BTC options and $2.1 billion worth of ETH options expiring. It’s one of the largest settlements for Deribit this year, and the open interest long-to-short ratio suggests the bullish side has the advantage.
What’s interesting is the biggest “pain point”: BTC at 75,000, ETH at 2,250. But BTC is currently still around 85,000, and ETH around 2,700—both are some distance away from those pain points.
So what does it mean? Simply put, option sellers (many are market makers and big institutions) most want the settlement price to land near the maximum pain point, so that the most contracts expire worthless. That’s why, as settlement approaches, prices are often “pinned” toward that level. The report also mentions that the rally BTC saw before this might be driven by buying from market makers hedging—once that buying settles, it will likely fade.
My own takeaway: on settlement day and in the hours immediately after, prices are especially prone to “false moves”—a quick spike in one direction, then back again. For friends using leverage, don’t open a full-position around the time close to settlement today. Price spikes don’t care, and plenty of people get liquidated.
The long-term direction has little to do with settlement. It’s just a short-term event—don’t use it to guess the bigger trend. It’s more of a reminder to manage your positions.
How are you handling the settlement today? Close positions and wait, or trade intraday using the volatility?
I took a look at some data this morning and found an interesting signal.
This week, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen net inflows for several consecutive trading days. On September 21, daily inflows nearly hit $1 billion—the strongest day since September—led by BlackRock’s IBIT alone, which pulled in $380 million. Bitcoin also rode the momentum and surged above $87,000, a new eight-month high, before pulling back into consolidation around the mid-$80k.
But if you look closely at the fund flows, the picture is clearly split. Ethereum ETFs were still seeing inflows of $270 million at the start of the week, but by Tuesday they flipped into net outflows—Fidelity’s FETH was redeemed by $67 million in a single day. The same institution, adding to BTC with the left hand while cutting ETH with the right—this isn’t broad-based, everyone buying kind of move; it’s selective picking.
Even more interesting is the structure. The leading products from BlackRock and Fidelity absorbed most of the capital, yet the overall net inflow wasn’t that large. That suggests many smaller ETFs are bleeding. Money is concentrating at the top—not the behavior of retail investors. This looks like allocation-style capital choosing the safest targets.
Bearish news hasn’t been in short supply, yet BTC is still being lifted by ETF flows. This indicates the core logic behind this buying wave isn’t a macro shift—it’s the idea of “we have to allocate some.”
My personal view: with this kind of capital structure, BTC’s downside resilience will likely remain stronger than altcoins. If ETH wants to move independently, it probably needs ETF-side net inflows to turn back into a consecutive streak. There’s no need to chase in the short term; when it pulls back, just watch how well it’s being supported.
What do you think—are these ETF funds long-term allocation players, or is it just FOMO at the tail end of a rebound?👀
Many people say that the encrypted future is in Wall Street, but today the data gives another answer.
Chainalysis just released its 2026 Global Crypto Adoption Index, and I looked at the rankings: among the top 20, there are 9 Asia-Pacific countries—Japan is 4th, South Korea 5th, India 6th, Thailand 8th, and China is 12th, followed by Indonesia, Australia, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Almost half the territory.
What impressed me most in the report isn’t the rankings—it’s the trend: cross-border stablecoin transfers were singled out as one of the fastest-growing use cases in Asia-Pacific. With fragmented currencies across Southeast Asia and payment systems that don’t interoperate, stablecoins end up becoming the best settlement layer. It’s not just speculation—real people use it to get paid, collect invoices, and get by day to day.
This is actually different from the ETF capital flows we keep watching every day—two separate lines. Wall Street focuses on how money is invested, while Asia focuses on how people actually use it. ETFs may see net outflows, but a merchant who uses stablecoins to settle accounts won’t just shut their wallets because market conditions are bad. In the long run, I bet the “how it’s used” line has more staying power.
Do you think the engine for the next market cycle is institutional capital, or this kind of grassroots adoption? Do you know anyone in your circle who truly lives on stablecoins? Let’s discuss in the comments.