Tommy_2027

外国朋友，您好，可以寄给我100美金，我再寄回100人民币，我们互换作为纪念币。中美友谊天长地久

Hello, foreign friends, you can send me 100 US dollars, and I will send back 100 RMB. We can exchange them as commemorative coins. From then on, the Sino-US friendship will last

📚 The first lesson in trading isn’t buying or selling.

It’s—entering an invitation code to save on fees! 💸

Do you know how expensive futures trading fees can be?

The fee rate is 0.03% 👇

💰 Capital: 1,000 U
⚡ Leverage: 50x
📈 Futures contract notional value: 50,000 U

One-way opening fee: 15 U
Opening + closing fees: 30 U

And that’s before funding rates and slippage!

Don’t underestimate fees. Trade frequently, and by the end of the month, you could pay more in fees than your initial capital.

🧠 Remember: Learn to control costs and protect your capital first, then learn how to make a profit.

Binance UID: 371817550

#Crypto #Web3 #合约交易 #Cryptocurrency

After days of hard work, my account assets have finally reached a new high.

I've successfully reached Level A1. Next, I'll work hard to push for A2.

After seeing this, even loan sharks’ “borrow nine, pay back thirteen” looks tame.

What’s left of crypto these days?

It’s dead quiet. For ordinary people, there are no more opportunities to get rich.

The big narratives have come and gone, one after another: ICOs in 2017, DeFi in 2021, NFTs in 2022, inscriptions in 2023, and memecoins in 2024.

By 2026, there are no new stories left to draw newcomers in.

I got into crypto in 2022. I made money from blockchain games, NFTs, and memecoins. But now, I really can’t see any opportunities.

On Twitter, there are hardly any KOLs sharing genuinely useful information. Most have shifted to chasing mainstream traffic and milking the old crowd.

People say, “If you can’t beat them, join them.” But in such a cutthroat environment, how could I ever compete?

After thinking it over, I decided to try a different path: go back to earning exchange referral rebates.

I’m going to trade on an exchange either way, and the exchange gets the fees regardless. So I might as well use a referral code and save myself a little.

Even if the market is cold, life goes on.

With fewer opportunities around, I’ll at least save whatever I can.

Garbage @AbstractChain has run away.

In January 2025, it launched on the mainnet—an L2 built by Tencent’s parent company. Back then, it was absolutely one of the hottest airdrops.

Our studio went all-in on it from the first batch—we were going for the airdrop.

At its peak, we had close to 2,600 fingerprint browser environments.

Later we scaled down to around 1,500 high-quality ABS accounts—
all the environment isolation, separate IPs, unlinked funds, no cross-interactions, and fund retention… it was all manual grind.

Last year we made a bit of money from other projects, so we kept ABS running.
By October last year, they still hadn’t issued tokens, and we already felt something was off.
But after investing so much, with the finished accounts already built to scale, we couldn’t bring ourselves to cut.
Our expectations had already dropped to: if we don’t profit, breaking even is fine.

Now they directly shut the chain—stop it, halt it, and don’t issue tokens.
I really want to kill that scammer Lueka.

1,500 premium accounts—the whole studio team.
21 months, over 600 days and nights of effort.
What we got wasn’t anti-scam—it was pure fraud, a scam even harsher than those industrial parks!

Sunk cost got involved in major decisions. Once you’re on the table, all you can say is: you gambled, you lose.

But what I want to say is:
Fuck you, Lueka.
Fuck you, Tencent.
Fuck you, ABS $PENGU

I didn’t understand before.
I always felt that starting a business meant doing something big.

Later I realized that entrepreneurship is really about doing a thousand small things—
and doing each one well.

Dreams and entrepreneurship are both systematized projects,
a very large undertaking.

So when it’s time for cement, use cement.
When it’s time to carry sand, carry the sand.
No step can be skipped.

Finishing a thousand small things can also get you fries.
Keep going! $BTC

Many people who lack professional skills think that by using AI they can do professional work. This is like some people who can use a hammer and therefore believe they are a craftsman.

In fact, there’s a core issue here: the difference between upper and lower limits. Knowing how to use a hammer only represents the lower limit. What truly allows you to become a craftsman is professional competence.

Today, many people use AI to work—generate PowerPoint slides, create business plans, and draft work schedules. But these people don’t have the ability to read information effectively, nor do they have the ability to identify problems and formulate questions.

So when AI produces content for them, a major issue arises: it becomes too abstract. Why is it abstract? Because when conducting business activities, you actually need certain dimensions of information—but you don’t need all dimensions.

However, large language models often add irrelevant information dimensions into the business model you’re trying to build. This creates a problem: time and cost.

So sometimes, when you use a large model to create a plan, you find the timeline is very long and the cost is very high. You can clearly feel that it’s not concrete enough, not explicit enough—perhaps even completely unexecutable.

So what’s needed today is not just people who use AI, but people who have professional competence and can use AI as well. In other words, people who can use AI to raise the ceiling—not just those who know how to use a hammer.$BTC

I don’t know what’s going on with this world. Sometimes I feel like I don’t belong in it.

Whether it’s the people I meet in real life, or the people I encounter online, everyone seems to like discussing problems from a macro perspective—talking about issues from an emotional standpoint.

I really don’t understand: how can a young person—someone in their twenties or thirties—who doesn’t even have basic survival skills in this world, support themselves? Don’t we live in a physical world where survival is necessary?

We spend so much time breaking down things at the macro level—how can we turn those macro things into actionable, measurable indicators? If you don’t have any survival skills, how are you supposed to carry out those indicators?

I think there’s a very big problem right now: when people hear those big shots, those entrepreneurs, speaking out online and in the media—and they think, “I should think from a macro perspective too,” and “I should deconstruct things the same way.”

But the truth is, every big shot, every entrepreneur, every startup founder—when they think from a macro perspective, it’s because they already have a stable foundation.

That foundation is a business, a team, a complete set of workflows, and a system that can continuously generate value.

Their judgments about macro issues are probably not wrong, because the environment is dynamically adjusting; the world is constantly changing, and so are demands.

They adjust their way of thinking—looking forward, looking far ahead—because they’re standing in that context, under their business. So their decisions need to be deconstructed using the macro view, with more dimensions.

But for ordinary people, we talk about macro trends and emotional trends, yet we don’t have survival skills—no matter if it’s the skill to cut hair, cook, or write code.

We end up over-deconstructing the macro, talking about emotional trends—so how can we make our own problems more explicit and more specific?

If someone can’t even make their own problem, or their own expression, clearly visible to listeners—so that they can easily understand it—what meaning does that conversation have?

I think the only reason I’ve been able to move upward these years is that I’ve stayed away from people who focus on macro trends and emotional trends.

Keep going—go make fries.

I used to not understand. I always felt that if you have a good idea, you can turn it into something amazing—then you keep that idea like a treasured secret.

Later, I realized that no matter what kind of idea it is, in this world there are countless people just like you.

Those who truly turn a good idea into a good outcome do one thing in common.

Because every idea—everything your mind generates from it—is abstract. There’s no way to communicate it to others through language alone, and transform it into a mindset that’s explicit, grounded, and ready to be put into action.

So, people who achieve major results during entrepreneurship, besides professional skills, are also able to turn an abstract idea into a concrete, executable process-thinking. And with the support of their own expertise, they ultimately turn that idea into a specific product.

It took me a long time to understand this.

Turns out, anyone in this world who can build a company well—anyone who can make money—is because they’re able to evolve the abstract ideas in their head into a specific product.

That’s incredible.

Because this path is very hard.

You have to turn those abstract thoughts into logic you can trace, then turn that traceable logic into executable, practical work metrics—then refine your actions day by day, optimizing those work metrics—only then can you succeed.

Hang in there! $BTC

Bitcoin’s price has already broken above the 200-week moving average.

Based on historical data, this really is a good time to buy.

Alphabet Inc (Google’s parent company) filed a 13F-HR report with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Alphabet’s publicly disclosed total equity holdings are valued at approximately $99.1 billion:
Of this, SpaceX ($SPCX) accounts for approximately $94.18 billion, or about 95%.

Other holdings include:
Planet Labs ($PL)
approx. $1.168 billion | 1.18%

AST SpaceMobile ($ASTS)
approx. $795 million | 0.80%

CME Group ($CME)
approx. $769 million | 0.78%

ARM Holdings ($ARM)
approx. $695 million | 0.70%

Revolution Medicines ($RVMD)
approx. $552 million | 0.56%

Freshworks ($FRSH)
approx. $164 million | 0.17%

Parabilis Medicines ($PBLS)
approx. $135 million | 0.14%

Google has long invested in SpaceX. In May of this year, the two companies discussed a rocket launch agreement intended to help develop orbital data centers.

As Google increases its research and development efforts in artificial intelligence, the company has been working to deploy orbital data centers into space, and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has also shown interest in this unverified technology.

ETH has been a frustrating sideways grind these past few days.

It’s been hovering around 1870–1880. After dropping from around 1950 near the end of July, it has kept stuck in a tight range of 1850–1880. Several attempts to push up to 1900 didn’t work, and over the week it’s down about 2–3% overall.

The 1820–1850 area is still holding support, while 1900 resistance is hard. There’s ETF inflow, but it can’t push the price higher—retail sells and large players pick up, so overall everyone is just waiting for direction.

If you’re holding, check your position sizing—don’t panic. Only after there’s an effective breakout above 1900 should you look to go long.

Why Have Every Crisis in the Past 30 Years Begun in South Korea?

Looking back over the past 30 years, each global financial crisis seems to have started in South Korea—this sounds absurd.

But when you review history, you’ll find:

In 1997:
The won collapsed
The KOSPI plunged
Foreign exchange reserves were nearly depleted
Then the Asian financial crisis swept across the globe

In 2000:
South Korean semiconductor stocks peaked first
A few months later, the Nasdaq crashed by 78%
The dot-com bubble burst

In 2008:
The South Korean stock market began to collapse
Just a little over a month later, Lehman Brothers failed
The global financial system collapsed as well

In 2021:
Bill Hwang used extreme leverage through Archegos
The fund imploded
Losses for banks, represented by large players such as Morgan Stanley, exceeded $10 billion
Just Credit Suisse alone lost $5.5 billion

In 2022:
Kwon Do-hyung launched LUNA and UST
Over $40 billion—nearly in a single night—evaporated
Then came Three Arrows Capital, Celsius, and FTX

In 2026:
Samsung and SK Hynix have come to dominate not only South Korea but the entire semiconductor industry in the United States;
More than $30 billion in inflows are tied to leveraged products linked to these two companies.
These products rebalance every day.

When prices rise, they buy more.
When prices fall, they are forced to sell.

The deeper the market drops, the greater the sell pressure created by these products.
South Korea is trying to deleverage, but the impact it brings continues to shake the world!
Over the past 30 years, South Korea has kept the world on alert.

In 2026, will South Korea bring the world’s semiconductor industry into prosperity again?
Or will it shake the world once more?
We’re experiencing it now!
$BTC

Elon Musk believes SpaceX's market value could surpass the entire Earth 🌍🚀

Elon said that if $SPCX fulfills its long-term mission, its value could ultimately exceed the total sum of “everything else on Earth.”

His vision focuses on Starship, Starlink, and building a multiplanetary civilization, thereby ushering in a brand-new space economy.
$SPCXB

Is BlackRock preparing to hit Ethereum again?$ETH

No talent or affinity? You still need to learn.
Trading is the same.
Just get on the big player’s same car.
$SKHYNIX

Changing the name will just pump it? No way.
First, let's short it by 10 points.