#dusk $DUSK @Dusk $BTC 11 host queries shared the same wrapper. Eight had the same deserialization risk.
That made me look closer.
The contract controlled the bytes. The node was the one reading them. A malformed relative pointer could push the host toward an out of bounds read. At that point, the problem was no longer contained inside the contract.
What caught my attention was the fix.
Dusk did not patch eight queries separately. It fixed the shared boundary and validates the archived data before deserializing it.
That order matters.
Validate first. Deserialize second.
There was no useful user side workaround here. The boundary itself had to be fixed, and because the same wrapper served 11 queries, fixing that layer covered the whole group.
The test is simple. Feed malformed archived data into those queries. The node should reject it before the wrapper tries to interpret the bytes.
#binancep2pantoan @Binance Vietnam $BTC Documents have been submitted. The case has been escalated. However, around 10,000 USDT has remained idle in the account for nearly 3 months.
Case #167469366 / Complaint #CC9828395 is a case I dug into for quite a while. The user stated that the account had been restricted for over 2 months and that they had submitted the P2P verification documents Binance requires. As of 19/08/2026, withdrawals still have not been enabled.
I checked Binance’s responses, and Support confirmed that the case was escalated and is still under review. Binance explained that a manual review may take longer because the due diligence steps involve account security and compliance. But the specific trigger for this case is not disclosed.
There is one detail that caught my attention: the user has completed the requested steps, but the review is still ongoing. Another case in the same Support Thread also had about 1,000 USD subject to a withdrawal restriction for more than 2 months; Binance had previously given a deadline of 28/07/2026, but after the deadline withdrawals still were not enabled, and Support confirmed there were no documents pending from the user’s side.
So the real cost here is not money that is lost. About 10,000 USDT remains in the account, but for nearly 3 months it cannot be used for withdrawals.
In this case, there is also no bypass. The documents have been submitted, the case has been escalated, and the rest is simply waiting for Binance to complete the review.
As of 19/08, Case #167469366 still has no unlock date. The 10,000 USDT remains in the account, but cannot be withdrawn yet.
My view: Extremely volatile and currently bearish after the sharp liquidation from ~0.27–0.28 toward 0.20–0.25.
* Current area: roughly 0.25 * Resistance: 0.26–0.276 * Major resistance: 0.292–0.300 * Strong support/liquidation zone: 0.213–0.229 * If 0.244 fails again, another leg lower is possible.
My view: Very bearish after the huge liquidation move from ~0.00124 to ~0.00109.
* Current area: 0.00108–0.00110 * Resistance: 0.00113–0.00117 * Major resistance: 0.00121–0.00125 * Support: 0.00106, then 0.00102 * Until 0.00113–0.00117 is reclaimed, I would treat rebounds as relief bounces.
My view: Very weak after the sharp breakdown from ~0.053 to 0.049.
* Resistance/liquidity cluster: 0.052–0.056 * Current support: 0.0490–0.0495 * If 0.049 fails → potential move toward 0.046–0.047 * I would prefer waiting for a reclaim of 0.052 before considering a bullish setup.
My view: This is one of the clearest bearish charts. Price has continuously stepped lower from 0.164 → ~0.133.
* Immediate resistance: 0.140–0.146 * Stronger resistance: 0.152–0.158 * Current price is near 0.133 * A break below 0.133 could accelerate toward 0.127.
My view: Bearish, but price is trying to stabilize around 0.00167–0.00175.
* Strong liquidation/liquidity above: 0.00190–0.00195 * Support: 0.00167–0.00170 * If support breaks → 0.00160–0.00165 is likely. * A reclaim of 0.00190 could trigger a squeeze higher.
Bias: Neutral / slightly bullish. Price is around 0.0355, recovering after a sharp dip toward 0.034. There is very heavy liquidity around 0.037–0.039, while 0.033–0.034 is an important support zone. My view: I think 0.037–0.039 is the main magnet. If price breaks and holds above 0.039, momentum could accelerate. Below 0.033, the setup becomes considerably weaker.
Bias: Bullish short-term. Price is around 0.0183–0.0185, with a strong upward move from the 0.016–0.017 region. Heavy liquidity is concentrated around 0.0185–0.0195. My view: This is one of the cleaner bullish charts in the set. 0.019–0.0195 is the obvious liquidity target. Losing 0.018 would weaken the setup.
Bias: Bullish, but facing resistance. Price is around 0.26, after a strong move from approximately 0.225. There is significant liquidity around 0.27–0.29, while 0.24–0.25 has strong support/liquidity. My view: I favor another push higher if 0.27 breaks. However, a rejection there could send price back toward 0.24–0.25 before another attempt.
Bias: Neutral / mildly bullish. Price is around 0.208, moving gradually higher after spending a long time around 0.20. Heavy liquidity sits around 0.198–0.20, while the upside has liquidity around 0.212–0.22. My view: Structure is improving, but not explosive. Holding 0.20 keeps the bullish setup alive; 0.212–0.22 is the main upside liquidity zone.
Bias: Bullish but highly volatile. Price exploded from roughly 0.0068 to 0.0082. Large liquidation clusters are visible around 0.0075–0.0080 and higher around 0.0088–0.0095. My view: This is a classic squeeze setup. If 0.0088 breaks cleanly, 0.0095 could be targeted. If momentum fails, 0.0075 is the first important area to watch.
Bias: Bullish, but extended. STAR has moved aggressively from around 0.105 to 0.145. There is substantial liquidity above around 0.15–0.155 and support around 0.123–0.13. My view: The trend is strong, but the risk/reward is worse after this run. 0.15–0.155 looks like the obvious liquidity target; a retracement toward 0.13 would be much more attractive.
Bias: Bullish short-term. The chart shows a clear upward trend, with price approaching 0.225. Heavy liquidity exists around 0.23–0.24, while 0.20–0.21 provides a large support/liquidity cluster. My view: Momentum still favors upside, but 0.23–0.24 could produce a strong reaction. I would rather buy a pullback than chase the current move.
Bias: Neutral. Price is around 0.225–0.23. There is strong liquidity around 0.20–0.21, while the upper side has notable liquidity around 0.24–0.26. My view: I prefer waiting for confirmation. 0.24–0.25 is the main upside magnet; 0.20–0.21 is the key downside liquidity zone.