Inscriptions are to some extent a test field for runes. Various large files and a large amount of "meaningless" BRC-20 trace information of inscriptions appeared in the Taproot data of Bitcoin. After being numbered by the CVE vulnerability, it caused an uproar. But inscriptions bring violent aesthetics and are full of topics. Runes are based on the UTXO model, and the data is stored in OP_RETURN (the space is very limited). It is more simple and compact, but due to the limited space, it can do very little. I am afraid that it is mainly for the circulation of coins.
Therefore, inscriptions are to some extent a test bed for runes. The "to some extent" here mainly refers to BRC-20. The runes I have seen, at least in their current state, are to solve the "awkward" inscription form of BRC-20.
It doesn't matter how the heat and controversy go. At least it is a good thing to promote the development of the Bitcoin network. If not, time can give a choice.
Someone asked me, what is good to introduce about the launch of runes on the new track of Bitcoin?
AUTHORIZATION is just 13 characters long.
There is also Taobao International Edition, which is riding on Alibaba’s popularity.
ALIEXPRESS•COM
There is a good consensus on IP.
I am quite optimistic about these two runes.
