Crude Oil Rises—Why Is Gold Under Pressure Instead?
Recently, the market has been influenced at the same time by geopolitical risks, energy prices, and expectations for Federal Reserve policy.
At present, Brent crude is around $107, while WTI is around $105. Oil prices have remained at elevated levels. What the market is most worried about is not crude oil itself, but its impact on inflation expectations.
The logic is simple:
Oil prices rise → inflation pressure increases → the Fed’s room to cut rates is constrained → U.S. Treasury yields rise → gold comes under pressure.
So right now, gold is being pulled by two forces:
On one hand, safe-haven demand driven by geopolitical conditions supports gold;
On the other hand, higher oil prices boost inflation and rate-expectation pressures that suppress gold.
That’s also why you can’t simply understand it as:
“Geopolitical risk rises = gold must rise.”
In reality, gold’s short-term price action still depends on the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasury yields.
Currently, the 10-year Treasury yield is already around 5%. If yields continue to move higher, gold’s short-term downside pressure could increase further.
Next, I will focus on three variables:
First, crude oil.
If oil prices keep rising quickly, inflation expectations may heat up further.
Second, Treasury yields.
If the 10-year yield keeps moving higher, gold may continue to be weighed down.
Third, the Federal Reserve.
Today’s FOMC rate decision is only the first step; more important is the policy guidance/signals after the meeting.
If the Fed releases more hawkish signals:
A stronger dollar and firmer yields → gold faces pressure.
If the policy statement is not as hawkish as the market expected:
Yields fall back → gold receives support.
So my view on gold now won’t be based solely on geopolitical news.
Crude oil determines inflation expectations, interest rates determine the cost of capital, and risk-off/safe-haven sentiment determines how much support is underneath gold.
Only when all three factors move at the same time is the key to understanding this round of the gold market. $XAU $CL $BZ
When you’re bored, feel free to come chat in the group and bullsh*t a bit 🍑 We can also discuss and exchange interesting news and market hotspots~ See you every afternoon in the live room—don’t be a stranger ❤️
CLARITY Act: A major U.S. crypto bill failed in a procedural vote in the Senate, temporarily shelved in the short term. ✅ If it moves forward: decentralized tokens would be classified as commodities; node developers and non-custodial DeFi would be protected; institutional capital could enter in large numbers. ❌ Current situation: the regulatory vacuum continues, and the SEC-style litigation enforcement approach remains; the legal environment for nodes and staking business does not change in the short term. ⚠️ The bill isn’t a “get-out-of-jail-free” card—custodial staking still faces compliance risks. The failed vote triggered a plunge in BTC and ETH, but I always believe it’s only temporary. #Clarity #比特币下跌4% #加密监管 $BTC
Crude Oil Rises—Why Is Gold Under Pressure Instead?
Recently, the market has been influenced at the same time by geopolitical risks, energy prices, and expectations for Federal Reserve policy.
At present, Brent crude is around $107, while WTI is around $105. Oil prices have remained at elevated levels. What the market is most worried about is not crude oil itself, but its impact on inflation expectations.
The logic is simple:
Oil prices rise → inflation pressure increases → the Fed’s room to cut rates is constrained → U.S. Treasury yields rise → gold comes under pressure.
So right now, gold is being pulled by two forces:
On one hand, safe-haven demand driven by geopolitical conditions supports gold;
On the other hand, higher oil prices boost inflation and rate-expectation pressures that suppress gold.
That’s also why you can’t simply understand it as:
“Geopolitical risk rises = gold must rise.”
In reality, gold’s short-term price action still depends on the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasury yields.
Currently, the 10-year Treasury yield is already around 5%. If yields continue to move higher, gold’s short-term downside pressure could increase further.
Next, I will focus on three variables:
First, crude oil.
If oil prices keep rising quickly, inflation expectations may heat up further.
Second, Treasury yields.
If the 10-year yield keeps moving higher, gold may continue to be weighed down.
Third, the Federal Reserve.
Today’s FOMC rate decision is only the first step; more important is the policy guidance/signals after the meeting.
If the Fed releases more hawkish signals:
A stronger dollar and firmer yields → gold faces pressure.
If the policy statement is not as hawkish as the market expected:
Yields fall back → gold receives support.
So my view on gold now won’t be based solely on geopolitical news.
Crude oil determines inflation expectations, interest rates determine the cost of capital, and risk-off/safe-haven sentiment determines how much support is underneath gold.
Only when all three factors move at the same time is the key to understanding this round of the gold market. $XAU
Will the Federal Reserve raise rates as expected this week? Wall Street is debating: will it end the U.S. stock bull market?
After an unexpectedly strong U.S. CPI report came out last Friday, traders generally expect the Federal Reserve to begin raising rates at this week’s policy meeting—marking the first rate hike in more than three years.
Historically, previous rounds of rate hikes have offered a reference point for today’s market. Based on past experience (though history of course can’t guarantee the future), U.S. stocks may first weaken, then rebound.
Among the six tightening cycles since 1994, during the first four months after the rate-hike cycle began, the S&P 500’s average return was negative.
This suggests that once the “rate-hike shoe” drops, U.S. stocks may look lackluster through the beginning of next year.
As of the close last Friday, the benchmark U.S. equity index, the S&P 500, is up nearly 12% year to date. Strong corporate earnings and a fairly resilient economy have provided solid support for bulls in the stock market.
If you extend the time horizon, the S&P 500’s performance tends to improve gradually: in the 12 months after the start of a rate-hiking cycle, the index’s average return is close to 7%, with a median return of about 11%. (Using median-based statistics helps remove distortions from extreme outliers—for example, the index surged more than 40% after hikes began in March 1997.)
If the Federal Reserve implements a rate hike this Wednesday, it will be the first hike since July 2023—when the Fed raised rates to a range of 5.25% to 5.50%.
Currently, the federal funds rate in the U.S. is at 3.50% to 3.75%. According to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, futures traders currently assign an 86% probability to a 25-basis-point hike this week.
One positive factor for the market is that mega-scale cloud service providers are still driving growth in excess returns through large-scale AI spending. The S&P 500 component stocks’ forecast for earnings growth in 2027 is expected to reach double digits. If the outlook for AI spending remains unchanged, it may be enough to offset any cooling in optimistic sentiment caused by the rate hikes.
Another bright spot for equities is that although inflation remains sticky, it appears to be slowing. The inflation rate has fallen from a May peak of 4.2%. This should allow the Federal Reserve to take a more gradual approach, and the data shows that the pace of rate hikes is crucial for stock performance—slower pacing gives investors more time to absorb policy changes! $BZ
🥊 Cryptocurrency News Roundup 📊 U.S. 《#CLARITY Act》
The Digital Assets Market Structure Act failed to advance during the Senate procedural vote on September 15, 2026. This event has indeed affected the crypto market, and the impact is not only about “how much it dropped today.” More importantly, uncertainty about the future regulatory direction for the U.S. crypto industry has risen again. On September 15, the Senate vote result was 49 in favor and 50 against, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold required to advance, so the bill has been temporarily stalled. Reuters reported that even some Republican senators joined the opposition.
🚩 Reasons it was not passed: Based on currently available public reports, it’s not simply a matter of “Democrats being anti-crypto” or “Republicans supporting crypto.” There are at least three key conflicts.
① Democrats want stronger conflicts-of-interest / ethics restrictions This is one of the most important obstacles in this round of negotiations. Democrats have concerns about the Trump family and their related crypto asset interests, and want to add stricter ethics and conflicts-of-interest rules—such as limiting federal officials from using public office to promote or issue related digital assets. AP reported that Democrats are requesting stronger safeguards, including stricter requirements for handling relevant assets held by the President that exceed certain thresholds.
② Democrats believe the original version is too friendly to the Crypto Industry Some Democratic lawmakers think the CLARITY Act still provides a regulatory environment that is too lenient for the crypto industry.
③ Republicans are also not fully in agreement—something many people may overlook. This isn’t “all Republicans support it and all Democrats oppose it.” Reuters reported that in the end, some Republican senators voted against the bill, preventing it from reaching the 60-vote threshold.
☀️🧧Morning light passes through the forest, and a new journey is officially underway 🌿
When traveling, it matters to proceed step by step—trading is the same 📊. The market has its ups and downs; there’s no need to let a momentary rise or fall unsettle your mind 🕊️. Stay sharp, hold your focus, and don’t blindly chase short-term fluctuations ✨. Slowly deepen your understanding, make a plan, and patiently wait for your own opportunity 💎.
May fellow travelers move forward steadily and live up to the time 🌱 #美联储加息是否已成定局 #交易训练 #1688家族family
☀️A gentle morning breeze through the forest opens a brand-new chapter of the morning 🌿
Morning jogging is a discipline of the mind, and trading is also a form of practice 📊. A long journey is won by steady progress; there’s no need to sprint all at once. Market fluctuations are like the scenery along the road—steady at times, and occasionally demanding 🕊️. Hold your rhythm, stay clear-headed, and don’t let short-term gains or losses pull you around ✨. Keep persisting and refining yourself—opportunities will surely arrive on time 💎.
To fellow travelers: keep your love at heart, and walk with ease ❤️
🧧🔥🧧🔥🧧🔥 The recent market action is genuinely a back-and-forth probing. Here are 3 supporting indicators to help you verify a true breakout: Spot CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta): Check whether the breakout is driven by spot active buying or by leveraged futures. If spot CVD and the contract price both make new highs at the same time, the odds of a real breakout are extremely high. If only the contracts pump while spot CVD stays flat, it’s often a false breakout. SR-Flip (Resistance-to-Support confirmation): After a breakout, wait for the first pullback on the 5M/15M timeframe. If, when price retests the prior high resistance zone, it shows reduced volume and does not break down, it confirms that resistance has successfully flipped into support—an excellent right-side entry point with relatively low risk. Liquidation Heatmap: If a large short liquidation pool (Liquidation Pool) has accumulated above key highs, then after price pierces through that area, if OI drops sharply, it indicates the liquidation has been completed and short-term momentum has largely been exhausted. Follow me—answer 1 and take the $SOL red envelope. 🧧🔥🧧🔥🧧🔥
#越南试点加密资产市场 Vietnam government bond auctions raise $564 million—should this news be taken seriously?
My understanding is: By itself, $564 million is unlikely to have a major impact on global markets. What matters more is the funding behind it and the interest-rate logic.
Vietnam has recently continued to finance itself through government bond issuance. This year, the size of government bond issuance has already been relatively large. At the same time, Vietnam’s 10-year government bond yield is currently above 4.5%, and compared with the beginning of the year it has risen noticeably.
So I’m paying attention to three points in this news: First, funding needs. When the government issues bonds, in essence it is raising funds from the market. If the issuance size keeps increasing afterward, the market will need to absorb more bonds, which could put some pressure on liquidity. Second, bond yields. If bond supply increases while yields continue to rise, that suggests the market is demanding a higher cost of capital. This would affect banks, corporate financing costs, and overall liquidity. Third, consider it together with the global interest-rate environment. Right now, US Treasury yields, oil prices, and inflation expectations are all highly sensitive. So I won’t interpret this news on its own as purely “good” or “bad.”
What’s truly important is: the bond issuance size + bond yields + market liquidity—how these things change going forward. For us in trading $BTC and assets like gold, Vietnam’s government bonds themselves are not a core driver. But if global funding costs keep rising, risk assets overall will likely face some pressure. When traders read the news, they can’t just look at the numbers—they must also look at the funding logic behind those numbers.
Did the CLARITY Bill fail? Should $BTC now be looking to go short?
Last night, the US Senate held a procedural vote on the CLARITY Bill. The result was 49 against and 50 in favor—failing to reach the 60 votes needed to move forward.
After the news came out, both BTC and ETH saw a clear drop.
But I actually don’t recommend chasing a short just because two words—"bad news".
The first wave of selling has already happened. What matters more now is whether support can truly hold.
$BTC
Currently, BTC is around $75,000.
Key levels to watch:
$74.8k—$75k: crucial support $76k—$76.5k: important reclaim zone $77.5k—$78k: overhead resistance $80k: psychological level
If it breaks below $75k and the rebound can’t reclaim the level, the short-side structure will become more obvious. Downward, you can look for $73k → $72k.
But if $75k holds, and on the 1-hour and 4-hour charts you see higher highs and higher lows, and then it can move back above $76.5k—$77k, then you’ll need to reassess the rebound.
So around $75k, I won’t force a short just to chase a segment of the sell-off.
$ETH
For ETH, focus on the $2,400 area.
On the upside, watch $2,450—$2,500; above that is $2,530—$2,560.
Only if it breaks below $2,380 and the rebound can’t get back above it would it lean more toward continued weakness. If $2,400 holds, and BTC is also stable around $75k, then you can wait for ETH to retake $2,450—$2,500 before looking again.
Also, today there’s the Fed interest-rate decision, so volatility could expand further.
So don’t rush into a trade today.
If it breaks, wait for the pullback to confirm. If it holds, wait for the structure to form.
News can influence the market, but what truly determines the next direction is whether price can hold key levels.
#美联储加息是否已成定局 CLARITY Act stuck—does the crypto market have to wait again?
Last night, the U.S. Senate held a key vote on the “Digital Assets Market Clarity Act.”
The result was 49 votes in favor and 50 against, not reaching the 60 votes needed to move forward.
So this time, it’s not that the bill became law—it’s that even the step to continue reviewing it failed.
So what’s the big deal with this bill?
In simple terms, it aims to make the U.S. crypto market’s regulatory rules clearer.
The market has long had a major problem:
Which coins fall under securities regulation? Which are commodities? And who is responsible for overseeing them?
The CLARITY Act wants to write these boundaries into law, clearly define what the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) handle, and establish more explicit rules for trading platforms, digital asset issuers, and others.
Because it couldn’t advance this time, market sentiment naturally took a hit.
After the news broke, Bitcoin briefly dipped to around $76,000, and crypto-related stocks like Coinbase and Circle also saw noticeable declines.
But one thing to pay attention to:
This doesn’t mean the CLARITY Act is completely over.
This time, the procedural vote failed. Also, after the vote, Senator Thom Tillis proposed a motion to reconsider—so there is still room for further negotiations and another push forward.
What’s really getting stuck isn’t only the question of whether crypto should be regulated.
There are currently many disagreements within the Senate, including issues about officials holding and participating in crypto assets, anti–money laundering requirements, and competition between stablecoins and traditional banks.
Even before this vote, the Senate Republicans had already released a revised version, adding a lot of new content—but they still couldn’t secure enough votes.
So I think in the short term, the market may continue to be affected by news flow.
But in a longer-term view, what’s truly worth watching is:
When will the U.S. finally set the regulatory boundaries for the crypto market for real?
That may matter more than the result of a single vote.
The CLARITY Act didn’t advance this time.
It doesn’t mean the regulatory story for crypto has ended.
But I actually think the most interesting part right now is this: The market has already priced in the outcome. Currently, the market’s expectation for a 25bp hike at the September FOMC is around 89%; Wednesday will be the final answer. So the question is: If everyone knows the hike is coming, why hasn’t BTC just crashed outright? Because trading has never been about “whether to hike,” but about: what the Fed will say after the hike.
📊 What I’m focusing on right now is three things: ① Can BTC hold above 77K? As long as it can stay stable around 77K, I won’t immediately turn bearish just because rate-hike expectations have increased. ② Can 80K break through? 80K is the level that bulls must reclaim right now. If 80K breaks with strong volume, market sentiment will improve noticeably. Then to look further: 82K—83K. ③ Post-FOMC remarks This is what I’m really watching. If there’s a 25bp hike, but the subsequent guidance is not as hawkish as the market expects, then “bad news” landing could turn into a catalyst for BTC to rise. But if there’s a hike and hawkish statements at the same time, then be careful—the market may continue compressing valuations.
🍑 So my logic is simple: Hold 77K → continue observing the bulls. Break 80K → target 82K—83K. Hold 82K—83K → the upside space opens up again. But if: 77K breaks down → defend first on the short term. I’m not going to panic just because “an 89% chance of a hike” is four words, and I’m also not going to start FOMO just because BTC rebounds. When the market is truly dangerous, it’s often not when the news is most frightening, but when everyone thinks “it’s definitely fine.”
Over the next couple of days, I’d rather: wait for the data, wait for the FOMC, wait for price confirmation. Don’t guess the bottom, and don’t chase the top.
What the hell is wrong with you?! Do you think Vietnamese girls are easy to bully? Come out and talk—stop pretending.
Maya小芳芳
·
--
Second Dragon Lake General Second Dragon Lake General Second Dragon Lake General Second Dragon Lake General Second Dragon Lake General
Hello everyone, I’m Maya, a streamer from Vietnam. Ever since I started streaming using this account, it’s already been more than three months. I’m just a small streamer. I stream every day, learn, and share—exchange trading experience. I’m not sure whether I can make everyone like me, but I can be sure that I’ve never done anything that deserves to make people hate me. If you don’t provoke me, I won’t provoke anyone either. But if you insist on coming to provoke me, don’t blame me for responding in kind. An old saying goes: “One old mouse turd spoils an entire pot of soup.” But I’ve always believed that no matter where you are, there are good people and bad people. You can’t let one person’s actions affect the whole group. Even now, I still think that way. However, people like you—this disgusting, nauseating “old mouse turd”—should be fished straight out of that pot so everyone at the table knows exactly who got to be that disgusting. If you’re just hiding in your own tiny, failed, and nauseating little world to entertain yourself, I really can’t be bothered with you.