#binancep2pantoan @Binance Vietnam
During an audit, I never believe what’s being reported. I only believe original evidence that can be verified and cross-checked, with a timestamp. For P2P transactions, it’s the same—one principle is enough to survive.
Escrow locks the coins as soon as the order is placed. That’s automatic control—correctly designed and doing its job. But an automatic control is never enough by itself. It only works effectively when the operator behind it—that’s me—carries out the manual part of the controls.
That manual part is in three points.
One: verify before entering the order. Credentials/badges, completion rate, the counterparty’s transaction history. Not to make things difficult for anyone, but to have a basis for assessing risk before the money moves.
Two: confirm using the original data before releasing. Screenshots are just a presentation that can be fabricated within a minute. The real balance in your own banking app is the only valid evidence.
Three: stop immediately when you see discrepancies. The account name doesn’t match the order. The counterparty changes the account number mid-way. Being pressured to release before you finish checking. In audit language, each of these signals is called a red flag: once it appears, you stop and assess—it must not be interpreted in a way that favors faster transaction completion.
After it’s done, save the order code, chat history, and receipts. Not because I suspect the transaction that just happened, but because an audit trail must be ready before you need it—not when the incident has already occurred and you’re scrambling to look back.
The protection system is already there. The rest is the discipline of the person who presses the button.
$ADA $TUT
During an audit, I never believe what’s being reported. I only believe original evidence that can be verified and cross-checked, with a timestamp. For P2P transactions, it’s the same—one principle is enough to survive.
Escrow locks the coins as soon as the order is placed. That’s automatic control—correctly designed and doing its job. But an automatic control is never enough by itself. It only works effectively when the operator behind it—that’s me—carries out the manual part of the controls.
That manual part is in three points.
One: verify before entering the order. Credentials/badges, completion rate, the counterparty’s transaction history. Not to make things difficult for anyone, but to have a basis for assessing risk before the money moves.
Two: confirm using the original data before releasing. Screenshots are just a presentation that can be fabricated within a minute. The real balance in your own banking app is the only valid evidence.
Three: stop immediately when you see discrepancies. The account name doesn’t match the order. The counterparty changes the account number mid-way. Being pressured to release before you finish checking. In audit language, each of these signals is called a red flag: once it appears, you stop and assess—it must not be interpreted in a way that favors faster transaction completion.
After it’s done, save the order code, chat history, and receipts. Not because I suspect the transaction that just happened, but because an audit trail must be ready before you need it—not when the incident has already occurred and you’re scrambling to look back.
The protection system is already there. The rest is the discipline of the person who presses the button.
$ADA $TUT