I have been in the currency circle for 6 years, and what I have learned is that trading strategies and trading techniques are mutually destructive.

To achieve good returns, if your trading skills are very good, your strategy must be a third-rate strategy.

Or the strategy is very good, but the technology must be very third-rate.

Suppose you are a master trader, and your skills are good. Technology is your ability and your subjective bias derived from combining various things in the market. Then what you gain is how well your bias is in line with the future trend of the market. If you add a strategy to it, and this strategy is fixed and objective, assuming that this strategy is very good and can make money by automatically running the quantitative program, then if you use this strategy, it will limit your technology. vice versa. There is obvious mutual damage between the two

Nothing in the world is perfect, especially investment. The best + the best answer can be the worst

I have never had any superb trading skills. I feel that learning technology is too tiring. You have to choose the right time, judge the macro, do this and that, and keep changing. It's too difficult

My strategy is a long-term holding strategy, which is very simple and simple. How do I hold it for a long time? I just use a fixed investment strategy to accumulate coins, buy them in batches, and buy them when I make money off the market. This strategy allows the coins to keep increasing and I keep holding them. Only buy but not sell. This is my strategy. I can say that I have no skills. Bear market, cattle market selling

I don’t have any technology, so how can technology harm my strategy? My strategy is like this without any interference and has become the most awesome and simple strategy.

You can look back at history. Suppose you started buying coins in 2013 and got to today. If you buy in the bear market and sell in the bull market, even if you don’t move all the time, whoever has the technology can defeat your strategy. I think even if there is, then it may be one in 10,000

Of course, we must rule out projects that rely on issuing coins. Those that rely on opening exchanges are in different ecological niches and are not comparable. If you are not of this rank, there is no need to compare.

Then your strategy is enough to make you that one person among ten thousand. Isn't it awesome?

The most powerful thing about long-term holding is actually the law of time, because no one can beat time. Good things will gradually get better, and bad things will gradually become obsolete.

If you use this strategy, it is equivalent to others making 100 a day, and you making 1,000 a day. Your income will not be much worse than ordinary people, but your strategy will make you a complete victory. After a few bulls and bears, you will completely reach the state of financial freedom.

This is a replicable long-term holding strategy that everyone can learn. Therefore, pursuing a technology abandonment strategy is to abandon the basics and pursue the last.

Of course, on the other hand, if you are focused on technology, then don’t study strategies. That will definitely suppress your technology.

I’ve finished writing, an old leek who sincerely wishes you to get rich in the currency circle.