A friend asked me
"What is the difference between an open insider trading and a hidden high stakes control?"
Actually, there is a difference
It's like you go to the D field, and the H officer tells you directly, I will give you a pair of aa and a pair of flushes from the previous player, you decide whether to call or not?
In contrast, H has dealt all the cards, and you don't know anything, but you judge based on the situation on the table that other people have good cards, so do you want to join the game and go to D or something like that?
Maybe this analogy is inappropriate
Because many high-control projects have not been successful
But the core of the rise is that the people who control the market need chips
Hot money is willing to add fuel to the flames, and institutions are willing to make a move
The reason why send it failed is that it is a relatively high-control project, but I overestimated the investment of sol fd in blinks. Compared with silly and wif bonk last year, send may only be regarded as a bastard, and it is not worthy of much financial support
I bet on how big the power structure behind it is
Now I bet wrong
In this case, institutional projects like send may only be a thousand miles away from Doraemon, and they are not the pot calling the kettle black
That's right, what annoys me most every time are the coins that are made public by institutions, such as this send, and the previous sanic , I may have lost 50,000 or 60,000 U. Is that a lot? Maybe not even one tenth of what I earned.
But it's disgusting, really disgusting.
It's better to play Doraemon?
Speaking of which, the problem is that the rat warehouse, or high control, is a double-edged sword, and it is difficult to look at them dialectically. There are more ways to make money by trading than just raising the price to realize it. Moreover, the good news of general institutions should be viewed in reverse. The price and trading volume can basically explain many problems. Losing this kind of money is mainly greed and ambition. It's not shameful to be a D gambler. What's shameful is that you don't learn from your mistakes.